Boris Johnson is facing a potential parliamentary rebellion after angering both Conservative Remainers and Brexiteers by vowing to push ahead with plans to override key elements of the Brexit withdrawal deal.
Despite a demand by the EU to drop proposed legislation - and an accompanying threat of legal action from Brussels if the UK does not back down - the prime minister is ploughing ahead with the move to alter key elements of the UK's Withdrawal Agreement.
Mr Johnson himself struck the agreement last year before formally signing the deal in January. But he is now seeking, through the UK Internal Market Bill, to empower ministers to set it aside.
The government - which has admitted the bill would break international law if passed - has argued the legislation is "critical" to ensuring the unfettered access for goods from Northern Ireland to the rest of the UK, and to protect the Good Friday Agreement.
But, as well as the fury from European capitals, Mr Johnson has also angered those within his own party ahead of the bill being voted on in the House of Commons.
Unhappy Tory MPs have tabled an amendment to the legislation that would try to block the government from overriding the Withdrawal Agreement without parliament's support.
Sir Bob Neill, who has tabled the amendment with the backing of fellow Tory former ministers Damian Green and Oliver Heald, told Times Radio: "I hope it's at least an indication as a government that really, you need to think very hard and carefully about going down this route.
"For heaven's sake, try and find some other way."
Sir Bob played down the prospect of Tory rebels, who are reported to number up to 30, losing the Tory whip by voting against the government's proposed legislation.
But he signalled he would be ready to be thrown out the Conservative parliamentary party if necessary.
Sir Roger Gale also indicated he is ready to lose the Conservative whip in order to vote against the bill.
"I shall do what I have to do on the basis of principle," he told Sky News.
"And the principle is that this United Kingdom keeps its word internationally."
Last year, Mr Johnson expelled 21 Conservative MPs from the parliamentary party for voting against his Brexit plans.
But it was not just among those Tories who campaigned to Remain in the EU that concerns were being raised about the Internal Market Bill.
Sir Bernard Jenkin, the leader of the European Research Group of Tory eurosceptics, told LBC Radio: "The prime minister should be more mindful of the reputational damage of playing such hardball when there's really no consensus from the country to go about breaking international agreements."
Mr Johnson, who enjoys an 80-strong Commons majority, could also face Tory opposition to his plans in the House of Lords after two senior Conservative peers expressed their displeasure at the prime minister's actions.
:: Subscribe to the All Out Politics podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker
Lord Howard of Lympne became the third former Conservative leader - after Sir John Major and Theresa May - to criticise the government's plans.
The Brexit-backing peer accused the government of damaging the UK's "reputation for probity and respect for the rule of the law".
He told the House of Lords: "How can we reproach Russia or China or Iran when their conduct falls below internationally accepted standards, when we are showing such scant regard for our treaty obligations?"
His fellow Brexiteer Lord Lamont, a former chancellor, warned the legislation would not get through the House of Lords unless there were changes.
"The government are in a terrible mess and in a hole and I don't think it is easy to justify," he told BBC Radio 4's PM programme.
"In a way, this could take us back to square one with a terrible dilemma."
Ahead of the bill being debated by MPs in the Commons next week, business minister Nadhim Zahawi told Sky News he and his fellow ministers would "look forward to outlining exactly why we're taking these precautionary measures".
"What we're taking is, really, an insurance policy to make sure that... if there is no deal, we will not allow adverse impacts of that on the people of Northern Ireland, of all communities," he told the Kay Burley @ Breakfast show.
"That cannot be the right thing to do and, next week, parliamentarians, the country, will be able to scrutinise what we are saying and how we aim to do this."
Mr Zahawi added that "ambiguities" remained in the Withdrawal Agreement and its provisions for the Irish border - known as the Northern Ireland Protocol - due to the deal being signed "at pace" last year, which necessitated the new legislation.
"What we are saying is, this is is not about if we implement them, this is about how we implement them," he said.
But Sir Simon Fraser, the former head of the Foreign Office, accused the UK government of throwing a "bombshell" into continuing trade talks on a future EU-UK relationship with the proposed legislation.
He told Sky News it "unpicks unilaterally significant parts of the Withdrawal Agreement".
"It is a very significant potential disapplication of important parts of that agreement," Sir Simon added.
"The fact they're saying they're doing this because they signed the agreement in a hurry and didn't realise its implications is hardly a convincing argument."
https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMid2h0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2JyZXhpdC1ib3Jpcy1qb2huc29uLWZhY2luZy10b3J5LXJldm9sdC1vdmVyLXBsYW5zLXRvLW92ZXJyaWRlLXdpdGhkcmF3YWwtYWdyZWVtZW50LTEyMDY4NTQx0gF7aHR0cHM6Ly9uZXdzLnNreS5jb20vc3RvcnkvYW1wL2JyZXhpdC1ib3Jpcy1qb2huc29uLWZhY2luZy10b3J5LXJldm9sdC1vdmVyLXBsYW5zLXRvLW92ZXJyaWRlLXdpdGhkcmF3YWwtYWdyZWVtZW50LTEyMDY4NTQx?oc=5
2020-09-11 06:52:39Z
52781052316363
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar