Rabu, 25 Oktober 2023

Wes Streeting says people are 'upset and hurt' by Labour's initial reaction to Israel-Hamas war - Sky News

Wes Streeting has acknowledged people have been "upset and hurt" by Labour's initial reaction to the Israel-Hamas war.

The shadow health secretary told the Politics Hub with Sophy Ridge that people wanted his party to be "louder and clearer" about the humanitarian crisis unfolding in Gaza.

Politics Live: Starmer accused of 'shying away' from crisis in Gaza

There have been tensions in the Labour Party after leader Sir Keir Starmer appeared to suggest in an LBC interview that Israel had the right to cut off water and power to the besieged Gaza Strip following the deadly attack by Hamas on 7 October.

Although the Labour leader has sought to clarify his remarks, there is still anger in the Muslim community.

Asked if voters could be turned away from Labour, Mr Streeting said: "No, I think people have been upset and hurt and wanted us to be louder and clearer on the humanitarian crisis."

He went on to say Sir Keir "doesn't think it's ok cut off power and water" and he misspoke in the interview.

"It was never Keir's intention to give the impression that we support those measures," he said.

"In interviews you have a sustained line of questioning - he was answering a previous question and not that one."

In the interview with LBC's Nick Ferrari, Sir Keir was asked what a "proportionate" response would look like to the surprise Hamas attacks, which killed at least 1,400 people.

Starmer is under the spotlight over his party's stance on Gaza

Taking to the dispatch box at PMQs, Sir Keir Starmer could have been mistaken for a man having a good week.

In high spirits, galvanised by a double by-election win last Thursday, he leapt to his feet and quizzed the prime minister on mortgages and no-fault evictions.

What he failed to address was the story overshadowing all else and threatening Labour Party unity.

The Israel-Hamas War has seen Sir Keir in the spotlight. Anger over an interview on LBC (where he suggested Israel had a right to cut off supplies to Gaza, a position later clarified) has led to councillor resignations and calls for a repositioning from the party leadership on a ceasefire.

On Wednesday, Keir Starmer and Angela Rayner sought to ease tensions in the parliamentary party by meeting Muslim MPs.

The meeting was described as "constructive".

One shadow cabinet minister told me that reports of dissent were "exaggerated" but there is genuine concern among some MPs I have spoken to that the party is losing Muslim voters.

Labour's shadow health secretary Wes Streeting admitted that people have been "upset and hurt" by the LBC interview and "wanted us to be louder and clearer on the humanitarian crisis". He said Sir Keir had been misinterpreted.

The Labour leader certainly has a delicate path to tread in the coming weeks. He has fought hard to move his party on from the past and present a united front - unity though can unravel very quickly.

He said that responsibility "lies with Hamas" and that Israel "has the right to defend herself".

The presenter interjected, asking: "A siege is appropriate? Cutting off power, cutting off water?"

The Labour leader responded: "I think that Israel does have that right. It is an ongoing situation."

The comments, which he has since rowed back on, prompted resignations among Labour councillors and angered the party's MPs, even those on the frontbenches as shadow ministers.

Sir Keir sought to cool tensions by visiting a mosque on Sunday and holding a meeting with Muslim MPs today.

Read More:
A third of Gaza hospitals shut due to lack of fuel
How Gaza went from desperately poor to even poorer

But while sources described the meeting as "constructive", Sir Keir did not back calls for a ceasefire, instead saying Labour supports "humanitarian pauses".

This position was repeated by Mr Streeting, who said UK politicians need to prioritise supporting Israel in getting hostages back from Gaza "and making sure this sort of thing doesn't happen again".

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

'All Hamas militants are doomed' says Netanyahu

However, he said there is a "responsibility" to minimise the loss of civilian life and get humanitarian aid in to Gaza.

"That is why US secretary of state Antony Blinken, our allies in France and our government are right to call for a humanitarian pause to allow the safe flow of aid through," he said.

Asked what the difference was between a "humanitarian pause" and a "ceasefire", he said: "This is the difficulty with the concept of a ceasefire.

"We're dealing with a terrorist organisation in Hamas."

Asked if Israel has committed war crimes, as some MPs have suggested, Mr Streeting added: "I'm not qualified to make that judgement."

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMigAFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS93ZXMtc3RyZWV0aW5nLXNheXMtcGVvcGxlLWFyZS11cHNldC1hbmQtaHVydC1ieS1sYWJvdXJzLWluaXRpYWwtcmVhY3Rpb24tdG8taXNyYWVsLWhhbWFzLXdhci0xMjk5MjU1NdIBhAFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9hbXAvd2VzLXN0cmVldGluZy1zYXlzLXBlb3BsZS1hcmUtdXBzZXQtYW5kLWh1cnQtYnktbGFib3Vycy1pbml0aWFsLXJlYWN0aW9uLXRvLWlzcmFlbC1oYW1hcy13YXItMTI5OTI1NTU?oc=5

2023-10-25 20:37:58Z
2522748775

Smirking paedophile police officer jailed after grooming 200 girls on Snapchat - The Independent

A serving police officer who groomed over 200 girls online and asked his victims to take sexual images in their school uniforms has been jailed for life.

Lewis Edwards, 24, had smirked towards the family members of his victims, showing “no remorse” after posing as a 14-year-old boy on Snapchat to target young girls. He was eventually caught with more than 4,500 indecent images of children, who were aged between 10 and 16.

He had threatened his victims, telling them he would publish their images or harm their families if they did not comply with his demands.

His offending took place between November 2020 until his arrest in February 2023, while he had joined South Wales Police in January 2021.

All but one of the victims were abused by Edwards while he was a serving police officer, and he targeted one teenager 17 days after meeting her as part of his duties.

Investigators found that on 30 occasions, he was in contact with his victims during working hours.

Stating that he had gained “sadistic enjoyment” from the distress of his young victims, Judge Tracey Lloyd-Clarke sentenced him to life with a minimum term of 12 years.

Members of the police’s online investigation team had executed a search warrant at the house Edwards shared with his mother and father in Bridgend, not far from South Wales police headquarters, in February 2023.

The prosecutor said: “The defendant was in his bedroom. Found next to him were two mobile phones. Police began the mammoth task of investigating vast quantities of material on the electronic devices they were able to access.

“What it revealed was online interaction between the defendant and female children. He would request girls to engage in various sexual activities.”

In one recording played to the court, Edwards can be heard masturbating as he encourages his 12-year-old victim to do the same.

The majority of his offending took place while he was a police officer with South Wales Police

He also told a victim that other girls had killed themselves and he did not care if she did.

The court heard some girls were so traumatised by what Edwards did to them that they started self-harming, and another slept with a hammer under her pillow.

On several occasions, Edwards told victims to write “Snapgod” on their bodies. Snapgod is a distributor of child sexual abuse material from whom Edwards had bought images using bitcoin.

Edwards also threatened to bomb the house of one of his victims and shoot her parents if she stopped sending him images, the court was told.

Edwards pleaded guilty to 161 offences, including blackmail, inciting a child to engage in sexual activity at Cardiff Crown Court (Barry Batchelor/PA)

Several victims said their trust of the police has been shattered.

One mother said: “We cannot get our head around the fact that somebody who was there to protect you could do this.

“The smirk he gave us in court shows that he has no remorse. I do not think he can or will have any understanding or care how he has impacted his victims.

“Lewis Edwards, I want you to know that as a family we will never forgive you and we feel nothing for you but hate.”

Another mother said: “As parents you will do anything to protect your child and when we think about what she went through during that period, it really does break our hearts.”

During the prosecution’s opening, Mr Griffiths had to take a break having become emotional reading a statement from the mother of one of Edwards’s victims.

One victim had confessed to her father that she had sent Edwards an indecent image via Snapchat and he was asking for more and threatening to share it if she did not comply.

“Her father took her phone and messaged the individual, saying ‘This is her Dad stop now what you’re doing is illegal’,” Mr Griffiths said.

“Their response was ‘Lol’ – ‘laugh out loud’. He replied with a photograph of himself with the caption ‘Just in case you think I’m joking I’m her Dad stop now’.

“From there he sensed the individual seemed to panic. They begged ‘Please don’t say anything I won’t share then. I won’t do anything’.

“From the panic in the tone he assumed he was speaking with a child. He suspended her Snapchat account and reported the episode to Snapchat.”

Mr Griffiths said the girl’s parents reported the incident to the police and they received advice about online safety.

Sentencing him to life, Judge Tracey Lloyd-Clarke told Cardiff Crown Court: “These are extremely serious offences and the defendant is a prolific offender.

“He has caused significant harm to the victims, their parents, their siblings and their wider families.

“It is clear that he not only gained sexual gratification but he also enjoyed the power he had over the young girls.”

She described his behaviour as “cruel and sadistic”, adding that she found he was dangerous and posed a high risk of danger to children.

More follows on this breaking news story

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMibGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmluZGVwZW5kZW50LmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWsvY3JpbWUvbGV3aXMtZWR3YXJkcy1wYWVkb3BoaWxlLXBvbGljZS1vZmZpY2VyLXNlbnRlbmNpbmctYjI0MzU2NDguaHRtbNIBAA?oc=5

2023-10-25 10:18:54Z
2553578674

Keir Starmer facing pressure over Gaza stance - BBC

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer pictured at a campaign eventGetty Images

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer is to meet Muslim MPs amid tensions over the party's stance on the Israel-Gaza war.

Sir Keir has faced criticism since seeming to say Israel had the "right" to cut off water and energy to Gaza.

He later clarified his position, saying he meant only that the country had a right to self-defence.

At least 19 Labour councillors have already quit the party over the issue, including in Cambridge, Nottinghamshire, Gloucester, while some MPs have also been critical about the position the leadership has taken.

In Oxford, Labour has lost its majority on the council, after eight councillors resigned from the party.

On Wednesday, a letter signed by more than 150 Muslim Labour councillors representing areas including Birmingham, Leicester and Glasgow, called on the party's leadership to back an immediate ceasefire in Gaza to protect civilians and allow access to humanitarian aid.

More than 30 Labour MPs, as well as former party leader Jeremy Corbyn, who now sits as an independent, have also backed calls for a ceasefire.

However, last week Sir Keir refused to support the move, instead saying Israel had the right to defend itself.

Asked if there should be a ceasefire, Labour's shadow chief secretary to the Treasury Darren Jones told the BBC "of course we want to get to a position where the fighting stops".

However, he added: "The quickest route to peace would be for Hamas to release those hostages and to stop attacking Israel."

Sources within the party have confirmed to the BBC that Sir Keir is set to meet some of his own Muslim MPs later to discuss the party's position on Gaza.

In an interview with LBC on 11 October, Sir Keir was asked whether it was "appropriate" for Israel to cut off the supply of power and water to Gaza.

"I think that Israel does have that right," he said. "Obviously everything should be done within international law, but I don't want to step away from the core principles that Israel has a right to defend herself."

A spokesman for the Labour leader later said he had only meant to say Israel had a general right to self-defence.

However, Oxford councillor Imogen Thomas - who quit the Labour Party last week - said it was "reprehensible" that Sir Keir was "ambiguous" on the right to water supply in Gaza and took more than a week to clarify his comments.

She told BBC Radio 4's Today programme she wanted to see the Labour leader "standing up unequivocally against war crimes and for humanity".

Comments from Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar also appear to be at odds with the position of Sir Keir.

On Tuesday he accused Israel of a "clear breach" of international law in Gaza, telling the BBC there is "no justification for the withholding of essential supplies".

Sir Keir has not explicitly said Israel has broken international law but has stressed it must be followed.

line

More on Israel-Gaza war

line

Meanwhile, Sir Keir has faced criticism from an Islamic centre in Cardiff which accused him of "gravely" misrepresenting a meeting with Muslim leaders there over the weekend.

Posting about the visit on X, the Labour leader said he had "repeated our calls for all hostages to be released, more humanitarian aid to enter Gaza, for the water and power to be switched back on, and a renewed focus on the two state solution".

However, the South Wales Islamic Centre expressed "dismay" at the statement and said Sir Keir had "gravely misrepresented our congregants and the nature of the visit".

"There was a robust and frank conversation which reflected the sentiments Muslim communities are feeling at this time," the centre added.

Asked about the statement, shadow minister Mr Jones told the BBC it was right for Sir Keir to meet with Muslim and Jewish communities to "listen to their concerns".

He added that the Labour leader had "reaffirmed" party policy off the back of the visit.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTY3MjEzMTkx0gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNjcyMTMxOTEuYW1w?oc=5

2023-10-25 10:29:41Z
2522748775

Keir Starmer to meet Labour MPs to discuss party’s position on Israel and Gaza – UK politics live - The Guardian

Keir Starmer will hold a “routine meeting” with Labour MPs to discuss the party’s position on the situation in Israel and Gaza, a shadow minister has confirmed.

It follows reports that the Labour leader and his deputy Angela Rayner will meet Muslim MPs and peers after prime minister’s questions on Wednesday.

Starmer attracted criticism last week from the Labour Muslim Network, among others, when, asked in an interview with LBC about Israel cutting off water and electricity, he said “Israel does have that right” while adding that “obviously everything should be done within international law”.

At least 23 Labour councillors have resigned from the party following these comments which they saw as an endorsement for collective punishment.

The shadow chief secretary to the Treasury, Darren Jones, asked about suggestions of a meeting on Times Radio, said:

It is perfectly normal for MPs – we all represent different constituencies around the country – to want to speak to the leader of our party.

I’m sure it is the same in other political parties where there are issues that constituents are raising with us. And the meeting this afternoon is another example of that.

And understandably, this is a very sensitive and emotive issue, both for people who have connections and relatives to the Palestinian people as well as the Israeli people, and it is perfectly normal for Keir to sit down and listen to colleagues in the parliamentary party and indeed our councillors and other members from across the country.

So, a routine meeting and this is another example of that.

Welcome to today’s liveblog. I’m Nicola Slawson and I’m covering for Andrew Sparrow today. Do drop me a line if you have any questions or comments. I’m on nicola.slawson@theguardian.com or @Nicola_Slawson on X, the site formerly known as Twitter.

Filters BETA

Migrants moved out of hotels who then seek council help for homelessness could end up in temporary accommodation - including hotels – the organisation representing local authorities has warned, PA News reports.

The Local Government Association (LGA) said the number of asylum seekers presenting as homeless is likely to “dramatically increase” amid government efforts to clear the backlog in the asylum system.

The warning comes after it was announced that the number of hotels used to house migrants will be cut by 50 over the next three months.

Immigration minister Robert Jenrick told MPs in Parliament on Tuesday that the process of “exiting” the first tranche of accommodation would begin in the coming days, adding that the plans are possible because of “the progress we’ve made to stop the boats”.

The LGA said councils “share the government’s ambitions to end hotel use for asylum seekers” but added that greater demand combined with an “acute” housing shortage means it will be “extremely challenging” for those leaving Home Office-funded accommodation to find an affordable, long-term place to stay.

In a statement, the association’s chairman Shaun Davies said:

Hotel closures have a direct impact on councils and local government wants to play an active role in working with government on the decisions on which hotels to close. We also need advance engagement on what other alternatives, including large sites, will be opened up both for those leaving hotels and for ongoing new arrivals.

Davies added that councils are “also becoming increasingly concerned over the numbers of asylum seekers presenting as homeless which is likely to dramatically increase when Home Office accommodation is withdrawn as a result of the current clearance of the asylum backlog”.

He called for a “joint and funded approach nationally, regionally and locally to manage the move on from asylum accommodation and avoid risks of destitution and street homelessness throughout the winter”.

Davies told the BBC:

The deep irony is that it might be the same hotels that the government are looking to close down for their purposes are the very same hotels that local authorities will have to stand up and fund for temporary accommodation.

The Refugee Council has also warned that cutting the number of hotels could be a factor in what it described as a developing “homelessness crisis” among migrants.

The environment secretary has suggested the damage done by Storm Babet was harder to predict because the rain came in from the east.

Thérèse Coffey’s remarks to the Commons environment committee prompted the Lib Dems to urge her to “get a grip” and “stop blaming everyone else for her failings”.

At least seven people are thought to have died during Storm Babet, with hundreds of people left homeless and about 1,250 properties in England flooded, according to the Environment Agency.

Coffey told MPs on Tuesday:

One of the things that happened particularly with Storm Babet is that we are very good, with the Met Office and the Environment Agency’s flood forecasting [centre], at predicting weather normally because most of our rain tends to come in from the west. We’ve got that pretty much down to a fine art.

This was rain coming from the other way and we don’t have quite as much experience on that. Therefore, our accuracy of predicting where such heavy rain would fall was not to the same degree as if it had been.

So the Environment Agency had moved assets from parts of the country more towards Yorkshire and the north-east and that way. But I’m conscious that there were still some places that felt they could have done with some more pumps.

The environment secretary, who visited affected residents in Retford, Nottinghamshire, on Monday, said £5.2bn had been allocated to protect homes and businesses from flooding between 2021 and 2017.

But she acknowledged it looked as if her department “may not be hitting” its target of protecting 336,000 properties by 2027.

Read the full story here:

The UK government has said it does not agree with the assessment of the UN secretary general, António Guterres, that there have been “clear violations of international humanitarian law” by Israel in Gaza, where more than 5,700 civilians are reported dead since 7 October.

Minister Robert Jenrick told Sky News:

We don’t agree with that. If he is referring to what has happened over the course of the last two weeks, we don’t believe Israel has broken international law. There is a clear right in international law for a nation to defend itself, and that is what Israel is doing.

We do want to see Israel, wherever practical – and it is immensely difficult to do – to surgically degrade and eradicate Hamas. That is what they are trying to do and we obviously hope they succeed because the world will be a better place … it will be a blessing if we can rid the world of Hamas.

The Israeli military has ordered the civilian population to evacuate south below the Wadi Gaza, and Israel has imposed a blockade on the Gaza Strip. It has continued to bombard the southern area of Gaza where it has told civilians to relocate to.

You can follow our liveblog on the Israel-Hamas war here:

Keir Starmer has been accused of having “gravely misrepresented” a meeting with Muslim leaders in Wales, amid anger among some in Labour over his remarks on the Israel-Hamas conflict.

The Labour leader visited the South Wales Islamic Centre in Cardiff on Sunday. In a statement on Tuesday evening, the centre apologised “for the hurt and confusion” caused by hosting Starmer, and said the intention was to highlight the suffering of people in Palestine.

It also expressed “dismay” over Starmer’s social media post about the visit, which said:

I was grateful to hear from the Muslim community of the South Wales Islamic Centre. I repeated our calls for all hostages to be released, more humanitarian aid to enter Gaza, for the water and power to be switched back on, and a renewed focus on a two-state solution.

In response, the South Wales Islamic Centre said:

We wish to stress Keir Starmer’s social media post and images gravely misrepresented our congregants and the nature of the visit.

We affirm, unequivocally, the need for a free Palestine. We implore all those with political authority to uphold international law, and the end to the occupation of Palestine.

The statement added:

There was a robust and frank conversation which reflected the sentiments Muslim communities are feeling at this time. Members of the community directly challenged Keir on his statements made on the Israeli government’s right to cut food, electricity and water to Gaza, warranting war crimes as well as his failure to call for an immediate ceasefire.

It comes after the Labour leader was forced to clarify remarks he made about Israel’s decision to limit supplies to Gaza.

Read the full story here:

Robert Jenrick said some people had been seen “glorifying” terror activities and “praising Hamas”.

The Home Office minister said he could not get into “specific cases” of visa-holders whose conduct is being reviewed, saying there was a “legal process that must be followed properly”.

Jenrick told Times Radio:

We’ve all seen instances of people glorifying, valorising terrorist activities - we’ve seen people holding deeply antisemitic banners, being interviewed on the media and praising Hamas.

That is disgusting behaviour. I don’t want to see that on our streets. And if that person is just a visitor to our country, they should not be doing that.

I can’t look a British Jewish person in the eye as immigration minister and say I’ve allowed somebody to remain at our pleasure in this country, who is conducting themselves in that manner - that is wrong.

If you come to this country, you abide by British values.

The Immigration minister Robert Jenrick appeared to suggest that he thought UK visa-holders should be expelled for inciting antisemitism even if their conduct falls “below the criminal standard”.

It comes after he told the commons on Tuesday that the process of revoking visas and expelling foreign nationals who spread “hate and division” has already begun “in a small number of cases”.

The Conservative minister, asked on Times Radio whether someone waving a Palestinian flag at a demonstration could see their visa revoked, said:

No, we believe in freedom of speech.

But I disagree with your premise that... somebody who is here as a visitor to the UK has the right to be antisemitic, to threaten British communities and can stay unless that is of criminal standard.

I think there is conduct which is below the criminal standard but which is wrong, would be accepted as wrong by most reasonable people.

If those people are not British citizens, they are just visitors to our country enjoying the privileges of living here, being among fellow British people, then I’m afraid their visas will be revoked and they should leave the country.

Keir Starmer will hold a “routine meeting” with Labour MPs to discuss the party’s position on the situation in Israel and Gaza, a shadow minister has confirmed.

It follows reports that the Labour leader and his deputy Angela Rayner will meet Muslim MPs and peers after prime minister’s questions on Wednesday.

Starmer attracted criticism last week from the Labour Muslim Network, among others, when, asked in an interview with LBC about Israel cutting off water and electricity, he said “Israel does have that right” while adding that “obviously everything should be done within international law”.

At least 23 Labour councillors have resigned from the party following these comments which they saw as an endorsement for collective punishment.

The shadow chief secretary to the Treasury, Darren Jones, asked about suggestions of a meeting on Times Radio, said:

It is perfectly normal for MPs – we all represent different constituencies around the country – to want to speak to the leader of our party.

I’m sure it is the same in other political parties where there are issues that constituents are raising with us. And the meeting this afternoon is another example of that.

And understandably, this is a very sensitive and emotive issue, both for people who have connections and relatives to the Palestinian people as well as the Israeli people, and it is perfectly normal for Keir to sit down and listen to colleagues in the parliamentary party and indeed our councillors and other members from across the country.

So, a routine meeting and this is another example of that.

Welcome to today’s liveblog. I’m Nicola Slawson and I’m covering for Andrew Sparrow today. Do drop me a line if you have any questions or comments. I’m on nicola.slawson@theguardian.com or @Nicola_Slawson on X, the site formerly known as Twitter.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMingFodHRwczovL3d3dy50aGVndWFyZGlhbi5jb20vcG9saXRpY3MvbGl2ZS8yMDIzL29jdC8yNS9rZWlyLXN0YXJtZXItbGFib3VyLWlzcmFlbC1nYXphLWFuZ2VsYS1yYXluZXItcG1xcy1yaXNoaS1zdW5hay1jb25zZXJ2YXRpdmVzLXBldGVyLWJvbmUtdWstcG9saXRpY3MtbGl2ZdIBngFodHRwczovL2FtcC50aGVndWFyZGlhbi5jb20vcG9saXRpY3MvbGl2ZS8yMDIzL29jdC8yNS9rZWlyLXN0YXJtZXItbGFib3VyLWlzcmFlbC1nYXphLWFuZ2VsYS1yYXluZXItcG1xcy1yaXNoaS1zdW5hay1jb25zZXJ2YXRpdmVzLXBldGVyLWJvbmUtdWstcG9saXRpY3MtbGl2ZQ?oc=5

2023-10-25 08:33:00Z
2522748775

Horrific details of police officer who bullied children on Snapchat into abusing themselves on camera - Wales Online

Horrific details of a police officer's callous manipulation of girls as young as 10 who he bullied and blackmailed into sending him sexual images and videos have been aired in Cardiff Crown Court.

Lewis Edwards, 24, of Bridgend, is being sentenced for 160 charges including child exploitation, blackmail, indecent images and inciting a child to engage in sexual activity. He was caught by South Wales Police, where he worked, after the force received intelligence about the downloading of indecent images from the dark web.

There were more than 200 victims he had targeted on Snapchat, groomed, manipulated and then threatened and blackmailed who lived in fear of the paedophile, who also sent images of himself masturbating. The defendant was identified, arrested and subsequently resigned from the force, before an accelerated misconduct hearing delivered the sanction of dismissal.

Read more: The sentencing hearing is due to last three days. Follow live updates from the second day here

Edwards refused to attend his sentencing hearing at Cardiff Crown Court which began on Monday. Here are the horrific revelations that have been aired in court.

Victims begged Edwards not to do it

The court heard how Edwards would add children, aged between 10 and 16-years-old, on Snapchat while pretending to be a boy of a similar age. Once he had received one indecent image from his victim, he would use it to blackmail them into sending more, while threatening to send the images to friends, family or post them online.

Many of the victims would beg the paedophile to delete the images, with heartbreaking audio and video footage played in court of the victim's pleas for empathy. In one video, a girl of 13 is exposing her breasts, while crying and wiping her face and types “Pls Stop… ‘I’m litro 13 pls jus del everything (sic).”

Another vicitm, who was just 12-years-old said: "“Just delete them please, I am sick of them now”, “Just delete them and I’ll do more”, “Leave me the f*** alone dude, I am serious.”

Edwards responded: "“Hehe if u leave il ruin ur life rn… Now do the vids I asked for and stand further back yh x(sic)”. The victim sent images of herself masturbating while visibly in distress and crying, and Edwards told her to not cover her face.

He forced one victim to film herself 50 times as she cried

One victim was forced to send around 50 videos in one day, where she was forced to insert a brush inside her private parts. She said she was so upset, but he kept telling her to carry on. She said that Edwards, who told her his name was “James,” said that if she stopped sending, he would have put all the images of her all over the internet.

He said: “Oh you wouldn’t want me to expose you would you, so do it or you will find out what will happen.” The defendant told her he would share the images on his “well-known Snapchat”.

On one occasion, Edwards sent her a video of two people having sex and told her to watch it. The people in the video having sex were a young girl and a boy of similar age.

For the latest analysis of the biggest stories, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here

He emotionally manipulated victims to send a first pic

Edwards, again posing as a teenage boy, manipulated one young victim into sending indecent images of herself by saying that would he self harm if she didn't. She said after talking for around two to three weeks he started asking for photographs and said he wanted to see anything of her body with no clothes on.

She stated he would “beg” and “threaten” her for the photos and that he was “getting nasty”. She states he was getting mad and defensive and was saying “You can trust me”.

The victim said he told her that the photos would help him with his problems, and she was the only reason he lives. He told her if she did not do it, he would hurt himself and be upset with her, he also told her if she didn’t then “something bad will happen”. He would keep on bringing up his mental health and that he was thinking of ending it all.

She said she was scared so sent him the photos. She said she sent him whatever he asked for so ended up sending him pictures of her “boobs” and where she goes to the toilet. Edwards would reply saying she is gorgeous and pretty and perfect and shouldn’t be insecure. He also sent her pictures of his penis and he sent her loads of these and she wouldn’t ask for them.

He threatened to bomb or even kill other victims

The fourth victim named in the charges was just 12 when Edwards made friends with her on Snapchat. She said Edwards started threatening her, telling her that if she didn’t send photos he could come to her house, bomb her, and shoot her parents.

The 11th victim was also 12 when Edwards targeted her. He sent the victim her address and said he would “kill her” if she didn’t send him images. She sent more than one image to “James” and was not wearing clothes. She said she was “shocked” upon being asked for the images and remembered “crying”.

Once he had indecent images, he relentlessly bullied and blackmailed victims

Once Edwards had got the initial picture from his victims, he would change. One girl of 13 said, after sending the first picture, “you’ve got it, now leave me alone". But he replied simply “well I’ve changed my mind” and he threatened to leak it if she didn't send more. The girl sent an image in which she can be seen crying.

Edwards showed a sadistic thrill in blackmailing the victims, threatening to "ruin their lives" if they did not send more images. After one girl threatened to jump off the roof, he told her to share more images "before I share this s***, do it and save yourself” and “If I haven’t seen it by then it’s going everywhere”. The victim said: “Please don’t post it, please don’t make me do any more”. But Edwards responded “You’re going to have to do more”.

In one message, the victim said: “I have to forget it and play it down, last night was really the last straw for me. I couldn’t cope physically being here, I just want you to leave me alone. I don’t have to know who you are, just want all my s*** deleted and you can leave me alone.”

She could be heard crying and said: “I’m sorry, I’m sorry for whatever I have done to you.” In haunting pixelated video footage played to the court, the victim can be heard crying and saying "Do I have to?"

Victims have self harmed

As a result of their treatment by Edwards, some of the victims have self harmed or had suicidal thoughts. A statement from one mother read to the court said: "(My daughter) has suicidal thoughts, says she doesn’t want to be here anymore and has self harm marks on her legs. She’s had counselling sessions but has become distant and secretive. She doesn’t trust people she should trust like the police etc. Not one of the above issues occurred before the incident. It’s changed not only her life but our lives forever.”

Another victim said she self harmed after she found out Edwards was a full grown man and a police officer. She said: "A few weeks later I self harmed, I didn’t want to live anymore because of everything that went on. I didn’t tell my mum and dad because I thought I’d get a row. I remember when we were talking I felt frightened because he was threatening and felt I had to do what he asked."

Victims lost all confidence

The children he abused described losing all confidence. One said: "I don’t trust the police at all, before this I would have called the police if I was in trouble but now I don’t feel like that. I don’t trust them anymore."

A mum said: "I feel I’ve lost a small part of my baby girl. Her innocence has been torn from her and she will never get it back. She will always have those images in her mind. Will she ever trust that people are who they say they are?...

“She’s now scared of the police, security guards and men in general. She is a shell of her former self. I failed to protect my daughter. I can’t console her or assure her everything is ok. When I think how scared she was, alone in the dark just a few yards away breaks my heart."

Families left distraught and angry

The words of Edwards victims are hearbreaking to read. One mother, who read her own statement to the hearing, said: "Lewis Edwards, I want you to know what you have done to my child and my family. You have broken us. I can’t express with words how angry I am that you have taken my daughter’s innocence and childhood away from her, especially when she was in her own home where she should have felt safe. You have broken her to the point she didn’t want to live anymore. I want the court to understand the irreparable damage you have caused us all.”

You can sign up to our regular Crime and Punishment newsletter here while this interactive tool allows you to check the latest crime statistics for your area:

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiYmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LndhbGVzb25saW5lLmNvLnVrL25ld3Mvd2FsZXMtbmV3cy9tb3N0LXNob2NraW5nLXJldmVsYXRpb25zLXNlbnRlbmNpbmctcG9saWNlLTI3OTcwNTg40gEA?oc=5

2023-10-25 09:29:00Z
2553578674

Selasa, 24 Oktober 2023

Live updates as emergency services descend on Cardiff city centre - Wales Online

A river rescue is ongoing near Cardiff city centre on Tuesday morning. Police said they received reports of a person in the river shortly before 8am.

There are a large number of emergency service teams in the area. Police, fire and ambulance teams have gathered near the Wood Street Bridge.

An eyewitness near the scene said: "There is a heavy emergency presence at the bridge at the end of Tudor Lane. There are four fire engines and an ambulance.. There are also lots of police in the area."

South Wales Police said emergency services were called at around 7.53am this morning following reports of a person in the River Taff near Wood Street bridge. A statement said it was an "ongoing incident" and added: "The road between Tudor Street & Wood Street remains closed in both directions. Please avoid the area."

A statement from South Wales Fire and Rescue said they were called just before 8am to reports of a "water rescue" near the bridge. A spokeswoman said: "Multiple crews are in attendance, alongside other emergency services colleagues. The incident is still ongoing"

The bridge was closed for two hours, but re-opened shorting after 10am.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiXmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LndhbGVzb25saW5lLmNvLnVrL25ld3Mvd2FsZXMtbmV3cy9saXZlLXVwZGF0ZXMtZW1lcmdlbmN5LXNlcnZpY2VzLWRlc2NlbmQtMjc5Njk4MzDSAQA?oc=5

2023-10-24 07:24:50Z
2518317709

Senin, 23 Oktober 2023

Met chief defends force for not arresting chanters of 'jihad' at anti-Israel protest - The Guardian

The Metropolitan police commissioner has hit back at criticism of his force’s decision not to makes arrests after shouts of “jihad” at an anti-Israel protest, saying the police cannot enforce “taste and decency” and laws should be changed if politicians want tougher action taken.

Mark Rowley was speaking after meeting home secretary on Monday, with Suella Braverman asking why police did not arrest those responsible for chanting “jihad” at a rally of the Islamist Hizb ut-Tahrir group on Saturday.

The commissioner said the law may need to change. Downing Street say there were no plans to do so, while the Labour leader, Keir Starmer, said any gaps should be plugged.

After the meeting, Rowley said he believed the home secretary was thinking hard about whether laws may need changing.

Rowley said: “I was explaining how we are absolutely ruthless in tackling anybody who puts their foot over the legal line. We are accountable to the law – we can’t enforce taste or decency – but we can enforce the law. We’ve made 34 arrests so far … We have another 22 cases … where we are searching for individuals.”

Rowley finished his service with the Met in 2018 as head of counter-terrorism, and in 2021 co-wrote a report on extremism. It described a “gaping chasm” in laws allowing “extremists to operate with impunity”. The report was for the commission on countering extremism, which advises ministers, and made recommendations to the government, which has so far not taken any action.

Earlier this year, John Saunders told the government to hurry up its consideration of the commission’s findings in his report into the Manchester Arena bombings.

Rowley said of the meeting with Braverman: “The conversation finished around the line of the law. It’s our job to enforce to that line. It’s parliament’s job to draw that line. Maybe events of the moment are illustrating that some of the lines aren’t quite in the right place.

“There have been reports from counter-extremism commissioners, the law commission and more recently Sir John Saunders at the Manchester inquiry/inquest that the law needs to be stronger in dealing with extremism. I know the home secretary is thinking hard about that. So a constructive meeting, in difficult times, where sober and determined heads are what’s required.”

In an interview shared with news organisations, Rowley doubled down on his view that there were gaps in the law.

Multiple sources have confirmed to the Guardian that the specific decision that the shouts of “jihad” at the Saturday protest were not breaking the law were taken by police as well as lawyers from the counter-terrorism division of the Crown Prosecution Service in England and Wales.

The Met commissioner said: “The law around hate crime and terrorism over recent decades hasn’t taken full account of the ability of extremist groups to steer round those laws and propagate some pretty toxic messages through social media. Those lines probably need redrawing.

“There are many countries around the world with different frameworks that have some advantages. Hizb ut-Tahrir … are banned in Germany and most of the Muslim world.

“There are lessons to be learned, but it is for politicians and parliament to draw the line. I’m focused … on enforcing the letter of the law and putting thousands of extra officers out in communities to reassure people who are understandably fearful given the ghastly events across the world.”

In light of the weekend’s events, Downing Street said police already had “extensive powers” to take action against demonstrators who chanted about “jihad”, while Starmer said ministers should consider new legislation.

Starmer, who was director of public prosecutions before entering politics, said on Monday that although it was a matter for the police, ministers should look into the lessons from the review co-led by Rowley.

“I think there have already been identified some gaps in the law in a previous review under this government and I think the government needs to look at whether there are gaps in the law that need to be addressed as well,” the Labour leader told reporters on a visit to Wales.

Downing Street appeared to have a different view. “We do believe that police have extensive powers in this space,” Rishi Sunak’s spokesperson said, when asked if officers could or should have done more. “We will continue to discuss with them so that there is clarity and agreement about how they can be deployed on the ground.”

On Sunday, the immigration minister, Robert Jenrick, said the use of “jihad” at the Hizb ut-Tahrir rally, which was separate from a much larger pro-Palestine rally, was “inciting terrorist violence” and should “be tackled with the full force of the law”.

Sunak’s spokesperson declined to endorse this view, while saying that the scenes “will have likely have been incredibly distressing for people to witness, not least for the UK’s Jewish community, who deserve to feel safe at what must be an incredibly traumatic time”.

He said: “That’s why the government is working so closely with the police and other groups to ensure there is clarity for those officers on the ground to take action where they believe the law has been broken.

“That decision is an operational one and will remain so, and that is right. But we will continue to discuss with the police about what more can be done.”

But in the Commons, the prime minister appeared to disagree with Britain’s top police officer about the adequacy of current laws.

The Labour MP Diana Johnson, who chairs the home affairs committee, asked what Sunak would say to the Metropolitan police commissioner, “who says at the moment law enforcement do not have the powers that they need to combat hateful extremism?”

The prime minister replied: “Of course, we continue in dialogue with them. Where there are gaps in the law, we’re happy to address and look at those.

“But we do believe at the moment the police do have the powers to arrest those who are inciting violence or racial hatred, there is no place on our streets for that type of behaviour and we will work extensively to clarify the guidance to officers on the ground so they are aware fully about the powers and tools that are available to them to make sure these people feel the force of the law.”

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiggFodHRwczovL3d3dy50aGVndWFyZGlhbi5jb20vdWstbmV3cy8yMDIzL29jdC8yMy9tZXQtY2hpZWYtZGVmZW5kcy1mb3JjZS1mb3Itbm90LWFycmVzdGluZy1jaGFudGVycy1vZi1qaWhhZC1hdC1hbnRpLWlzcmFlbC1wcm90ZXN00gEA?oc=5

2023-10-23 17:18:00Z
2553989292