Kamis, 21 April 2022

Rikki Neave: James Watson guilty of schoolboy's 1994 murder - BBC

A family photograph of six-year-old Rikki Neave
Cambs Police

A man has been found guilty of murdering a six-year-old schoolboy more than 27 years ago.

Rikki Neave disappeared on 28 November 1994 and his body was found in woods near his Peterborough home the following day.

He had been strangled and his naked body deliberately posed in a star shape by his killer.

James Watson, now 41 but 13 at the time of Rikki's death, was found guilty by jurors at the Old Bailey in London.

He was the second person to stand trial for Rikki's murder, after the boy's mother Ruth Neave was cleared by a jury in 1996.

Watson was convicted after jurors were given a majority verdict direction by judge Mrs Justice McGowan. They deliberated for 36 hours and 31 minutes following the 11-week trial.

Ms Neave described her son's murderer as a "monster", criticised the original investigation and said police and social services "totally ruined mine and my daughters' lives".

In a statement, she said: "The only thing now is to close this chapter in my life and open a new one.

"I wonder what Rikki would be like today, married, children? Who knows?

"But this monster has taken that all from me and my daughters."

James Watson
Cambridgeshire Police

A cold case investigation into Rikki's murder was opened in 2015.

Adhesive tapings from his clothes were examined and a DNA match to Watson was made.

Watson claimed he may have lifted Rikki to help him see over a fence, but police found archive TV footage showing there was no fence at the time.

Jurors heard Watson strangled his victim with a ligature or anorak collar to fulfil a "morbid fantasy" he had told his mother about three days before.

He stripped Rikki and posed his naked body in a star shape for sexual gratification, the court heard.

Rikki Neave
PA Media

Watson was interviewed as a witness by police in 1994 after an elderly resident reported seeing him with Rikki.

Rikki's last meal of Weetabix fixed his time of death at about midday, which meant the boy was killed shortly after being seen with Watson.

Police had previously interviewed Watson over an allegation he molested a five-year-old in 1993.

A former girlfriend also told jurors he put his hands around her throat during sex.

While on bail following his arrest in 2016, Watson left the UK in a motorhome via the Dover ferry port with another bail hostel resident.

He contacted his sister from France and she told the trial that Watson said he "was in a lot of trouble and he had made a huge mistake".

Watson was re-arrested near the British Embassy in Lisbon and was brought back to the UK.

police
PA Media
presentational grey line

BBC correspondent Jo Black at the Old Bailey

Rikki Neave was a cheeky and mischievous six-year-old who loved playing on his Game Boy.

The woodland on the edge of Peterborough's Welland estate was a place where Rikki would play, build dens, catch frogs and run around with sticks - "boy's stuff" as one of his friends described it.

But it's also the place where he was murdered and left so callously in a Vitruvian man pose. Today, many of those directly touched by this tragedy have left the estate and moved elsewhere.

And while some of today's residents are too young to recall what happened back in 1994, there are people who stayed and remember it like it was yesterday.

flowers
PA Media

At the time of Rikki's death, a friend of the Neave family said she "couldn't wait" to find out who had killed Rikki, so it could offer some "peace of mind".

That road to justice has taken almost 28 years and has been complex. James Watson was an adolescent, he murdered a small boy and then kept quiet.

But the vociferous campaigning by Rikki's family seeking answers, advances in forensic science and a re-examination of the evidence by a completely new team of police officers led to Watson being convicted.

presentational grey line

Reacting to the verdict, Rikki's sister Rochelle Neave, 30, said: "He thought he'd got away with it for that many years and thought we were just going to go away and roll under the table. We weren't."

Youngest sister Sheradyn Neave, 27, who was a baby when Rikki died, added: "I think we were let down by the police at the time, we were let down by social services, we were let down by everyone who was in our lives who was meant to care."

Former assistant chief constable Paul Fullwood, who led the cold case investigation for Cambridgeshire Police, called Watson "a fantasist, a dangerous individual and a compulsive liar".

Former Assistant Chief Constable Paul Fullwood
PA Media

Speaking outside the Old Bailey, he acknowledged "there's lessons that have been learned since the 1994 investigation".

He added: "We've spoken to Ruth [Neave] and we hope that today's verdict brings some closure for the years and years of the investigation while it's gone on."

Clare Forsdike, a senior crown prosecutor at the Crown Prosecution Service, said the conviction "concludes an appalling unsolved crime almost 30 years after it happened. It brings justice for Rikki."

"Only James Watson knows why he did it. He remained silent for two decades and then put Rikki's family through the agony of a trial," she said.

Picture of Ruth Neave

Jurors were told that during the original police case against mother Ruth Neave, incorrect weight was given to sightings of Rikki, at a time when reliable evidence showed he was already dead.

"This fundamental error deflected the focus of attention of the investigation," prosecutor John Price QC said.

She was cleared of his murder, but jailed for child cruelty - a charge she subsequently claimed to have been "bullied" into admitting.

Watson will be sentenced on 9 May.

presentational grey line

Find BBC News: East of England on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter. If you have a story suggestion email eastofenglandnews@bbc.co.uk

Related Internet Links

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiPWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLWVuZ2xhbmQtY2FtYnJpZGdlc2hpcmUtNjA5ODQ0MTLSAUFodHRwczovL3d3dy5iYmMuY28udWsvbmV3cy91ay1lbmdsYW5kLWNhbWJyaWRnZXNoaXJlLTYwOTg0NDEyLmFtcA?oc=5

2022-04-21 15:53:56Z
1394949252

Downing Street parties:PM says he'll fight next election as Tory leader - as minister insists delaying vote is fair thing to do - Sky News

Boris Johnson has vowed to fight the next election as Tory leader despite pressure to resign over the partygate row - as a minister insisted that delaying a Commons vote over the affair was the "right thing to do".

As he set off on a two-day trip to India, the prime minister said he had no plans to quit over the Met Police investigation into parties in Downing Street and across Whitehall during lockdown.

"The best thing to do for the people, for parliament, is to get on and focus on the things we were elected to do," he said.

His comments came shortly before MPs were due to vote on Thursday on whether he should be investigated for misleading the Commons when he denied COVID rules had been broken.

On Wednesday evening, however, the government sought to delay the vote until after the police inquiry was completed and the report by civil servant Sue Gray into partygate had been published.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Angela Rayner tells Kay Burley the partygate fine for Boris Johnson is a 'red line' and that 'we need a prime minister the people have trust and confidence in'

Education Secretary Nadhim Zahawi told Sky News' Kay Burley that was "the right way of doing this if you follow due process".

He said: "I think you'll find most of my colleagues, who are fair-minded, who believe in due process, will vote for the amendment - because it's the right thing to do."

More on Boris Johnson

Former Tory MP David Gauke questioned that rationale, telling Sky News that even if the probe does take place after the police and Sue Gray inquiries "it seems perfectly reasonable to make the decision that there should be such an investigation, at this point."

Otherwise, Conservatives could find themselves "accused of trying to cover up this issue, of trying to protect the prime minister".

The government argues that its delaying amendment will allow MPs "to have all the facts at their disposal" when they make a decision.

It is understood that all Tory MPs will be whipped to support the move, which could push back the vote for months.

There is likely to be heated debate on the matter in the Commons today.

Mr Johnson, however, will miss it after landing in India this morning.

When asked by reporters on the way there whether there were any circumstances under which he would resign, the prime minister said: "Not a lot springs to mind at the moment."

Modi
Image: Boris Johnson will begin a two-day visit to India today

Pressed further, he suggested partygate was not at the forefront of voters' minds.

"I think politics has taught me one thing which is that you're better off talking and focusing on the things that matter and the things that make a real difference to the electorate, and not about politicians themselves."

PM fined for birthday event

Labour tabled the motion on whether Mr Johnson misled parliament after he was fined for attending his own birthday party at Downing Street during lockdown in June 2020.

He is also thought to have been at other gatherings under investigation by Scotland Yard.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The prime minister apologises to the House of Commons

Labour's original motion said he misled the Commons on at least four occasions:

• On 1 December 2021, Mr Johnson told MPs "that all guidance was followed in Number 10"

• On 8 December 2021, he said: "I have been repeatedly assured since these allegations emerged that there was no party and that no COVID rules were broken"

• Also that day, he said: "I am sickened myself and furious about that, but I repeat what I have said to him: I have been repeatedly assured that the rules were not broken"

• Finally on the same day: "The guidance was followed and the rules were followed at all times"

In the Commons on Tuesday, Mr Johnson repeatedly apologised to MPs but insisted he had not believed the birthday party broke COVID rules.

Modi
Image: The PM's visit comes at a time when Prime Minister Modi's government is refusing to criticise Russia

The vote would refer Mr Johnson to the privileges committee, which would investigate whether he misled Parliament and has the power to force the release of documents and photos linked to partygate.

The ministerial code states that ministers who deliberately mislead the House are expected to quit.

PM in India

Mr Johnson's visit comes as Prime Minister Modi's government refuses to criticise Russia, an ally of India since the Cold War.

India relies heavily on Moscow for arms imports and has abstained in a series of UN votes over the war in Ukraine.

"I will make the argument that everybody needs to move away from dependence on Putin's hydrocarbons," Mr Johnson said.

He also vowed to bring up human rights concerns with Mr Modi, who is accused of whipping up anti-Muslim sentiment.

Mr Johnson is expected to announce a new trade agreement with India, which will see more than £1bn in investments and export deals and the creation of almost 11,000 jobs in the UK.

However, the prime minister has indicated the deal will include accepting Delhi's demands for an increase in migration to the UK.

Downing Street said the deal needs to be "fair" and "reciprocal" while being consistent with the points-based immigration system put in place after Brexit.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMimQFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9kb3duaW5nLXN0cmVldC1wYXJ0aWVzLWJvcmlzLWpvaG5zb24tc2F5cy1oZS1pbnRlbmRzLXRvLWZpZ2h0LW5leHQtZWxlY3Rpb24tYXMtdG9yeS1sZWFkZXItYW1pZC1vbmdvaW5nLXBhcnR5Z2F0ZS1yb3ctMTI1OTQ2NTHSAZ0BaHR0cHM6Ly9uZXdzLnNreS5jb20vc3RvcnkvYW1wL2Rvd25pbmctc3RyZWV0LXBhcnRpZXMtYm9yaXMtam9obnNvbi1zYXlzLWhlLWludGVuZHMtdG8tZmlnaHQtbmV4dC1lbGVjdGlvbi1hcy10b3J5LWxlYWRlci1hbWlkLW9uZ29pbmctcGFydHlnYXRlLXJvdy0xMjU5NDY1MQ?oc=5

2022-04-21 06:56:15Z
1392796546

Rabu, 20 April 2022

Prince Harry reveals he misses family in UK and working from home has been 'really hard' in interview with Hoda Kotb - Sky News

Prince Harry has said he misses his family in his latest television interview - and admitted that working from home has been "really hard" especially with young children in the house.

In an interview with NBC's Today show host Hoda Kotb in the Netherlands about the Invictus Games, the Duke of Sussex spoke openly about his family and how he wants to make the world a "better place for his kids".

He also said how he feels the guidance of his mother "more than ever before".

Prince Harry has sat down for an interview with Hoda Kotb at the Invictus Games
Image: Prince Harry sat down for an interview with Hoda Kotb at the Invictus Games

Asked if he missed his family at home, he said "yes", adding "especially over the last two years, for most people, have we not missed their families? Right?"

But when asked specifically if he missed his brother and father, Prince William and Prince Charles, he stopped short of answering directly, saying he was focused on competitors at the Invictus Games.

"Look, I mean... at the moment, I'm here focused on these guys and these families and giving everything I can, 120% to them to make sure that they have the experience of a lifetime," he said.

"That's my focus here. And when I leave here, I go back, and my focus is my family, who I miss massively."

More on Duchess Of Sussex

Harry's Platinum Jubilee uncertainty

The duke said he does not know if he will return to the UK to celebrate the Queen's Platinum Jubilee, saying there are "security issues and everything else".

He said he was "sure" his grandmother was looking forward to her celebrations, but was not sure he would be able to attend.

When asked if he would be there, he said: "I don't know yet. There's lots of things - security issues and everything else.

"So this is what I'm trying to do - trying to make it possible that, you know, I can get my kids to meet her."

There has been speculation whether Harry will make a balcony appearance with the Queen during the Platinum Jubilee celebrations.

Working from home 'not all it's cracked up to be'

He said days revolve "around the kids as much as humanly possible" and they would interrupt their Zoom calls.

The 37-year-old added: "This whole working from home stuff is not all it's cracked up to be - certainly post-COVID - because it's really hard.

"But when your kids and you are in the same place, it's really hard to separate the work from them, because they kind of overlap. I mean, Archie spends more time interrupting our Zoom calls."

It was pointed out to Harry that he had lived in the US for two years and he was asked if he feels "peaceful now".

He said: "I don't know how many people feel truly peaceful, you know? I feel, at times, I feel massively at peace.

"And we as human beings are compassionate people. But when your life becomes really hard, it can be, for some, harder to find the compassion for other people.

"But what I've learned over the years is - certainly for myself - I find healing in helping others. And I think that's what we should really be focusing on."

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

'US welcomed us with open arms'

Harry says his mother is 'helping me set up'

Harry said he had "always wanted to be a dad" and "I've got two little people who I'm responsible for" and had been telling them about his mother, who died in 1997.

Of his son, Archie, two, the duke said: "I don't tell him all the stuff that happened, but certainly this is, you know, Grandma Diana and a couple of photos up in the house."

Asked if he feels the presence of his mother, Harry added: "It's constant. It has been over the last two years. More so than ever before.

"It's almost as though she's done her bit with my brother and now she's very much back to helping me. Got him set up, now she's helping me set up. That's what it feels like.

"He's got his kids. I've got my kids. You know, circumstances are obviously different.

"I feel her presence in almost everything that I do now. But definitely more so in the last two years than ever before."

The Duke of Sussex plays table tennis at the Dusseldorf 2022 stand during the Invictus Games at Zuiderpark the Hague, Netherlands. Picture date: Tuesday April 19, 2022.
Image: The Duke of Sussex plays table tennis at the Invictus Games

Duke tells of responsibility 'I feel' as a parent

He said there was "so much to be happy about in the outside world, but there's also so much to worry about" and it was about "trying to make the world a better place for my kids".

He added: "Otherwise, what's the point in bringing kids into this world, right? It's a responsibility that I feel as a parent."

The Duke of Sussex was joined by his wife, Meghan, to visit the Queen during their journey to the Invictus Games last week.

Harry said his grandmother was "on great form" and he wanted to make sure she was "protected" and had the "right people around her".

Queen to celebrate birthday at Sandringham

Meanwhile, the Queen has arrived at her Norfolk estate where she will celebrate her 96th birthday on Thursday.

The monarch was flown by helicopter from Windsor Castle to her Sandringham home, where she enjoyed family gatherings with the Duke of Edinburgh.

The Queen has been experiencing mobility issues in recent months and cancelled appearances at a number of events.

She was able to attend Philip's memorial service and has continued carrying out her duties of state and hosting virtual events.

It is thought the monarch will stay at the Duke of Edinburgh's cottage Wood Farm while at Sandringham, a property she said her late husband "loved".

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMilgFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9wcmluY2UtaGFycnktcmV2ZWFscy1oZS1taXNzZXMtZmFtaWx5LWluLXVrLWFuZC13b3JraW5nLWZyb20taG9tZS1oYXMtYmVlbi1yZWFsbHktaGFyZC1pbi1pbnRlcnZpZXctd2l0aC1ob2RhLWtvdGItMTI1OTQzNDHSAZoBaHR0cHM6Ly9uZXdzLnNreS5jb20vc3RvcnkvYW1wL3ByaW5jZS1oYXJyeS1yZXZlYWxzLWhlLW1pc3Nlcy1mYW1pbHktaW4tdWstYW5kLXdvcmtpbmctZnJvbS1ob21lLWhhcy1iZWVuLXJlYWxseS1oYXJkLWluLWludGVydmlldy13aXRoLWhvZGEta290Yi0xMjU5NDM0MQ?oc=5

2022-04-20 14:35:25Z
1391837444

Scarborough man jailed for attempted murder of ex-girlfriend - BBC

Jack Darrion Sutton
North Yorkshire Police

A man who stabbed his ex-girlfriend in a "brutal attack" has been jailed for 16 years for attempted murder.

Jack Darrion Sutton, 24, admitted stabbing his former partner multiple times in her face, arms and chest in Scarborough last December.

After attacking the 23-year-old, Sutton fled before eventually being found in a garden on Mount View Avenue.

Det Ch Insp Graeme Wright said Sutton's ex-partner was lucky she had "escaped with her life".

Leeds Crown Court was told the attack happened on Londesborough Road on the evening of 10 December 2021.

Officers were called and they managed to stem the woman's bleeding before she was taken to hospital for emergency treatment.

As well as pleading guilty to attempted murder, Sutton, of Mount View Avenue, Scarborough, admitted possession of an offensive weapon and was given an extended licence period of four years.

Det Ch Insp Wright said: "This was an extremely brutal and frightening attack in which the victim was very lucky to escape with her life.

"Sutton now accepts his actions that night were reprehensible and could have resulted in fatal injuries to the brave victim."

Presentational grey line

Follow BBC Yorkshire on Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. Send your story ideas to yorkslincs.news@bbc.co.uk or send video here.

Related Internet Links

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiQ2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLWVuZ2xhbmQteW9yay1ub3J0aC15b3Jrc2hpcmUtNjExNjAxODTSAUdodHRwczovL3d3dy5iYmMuY28udWsvbmV3cy91ay1lbmdsYW5kLXlvcmstbm9ydGgteW9ya3NoaXJlLTYxMTYwMTg0LmFtcA?oc=5

2022-04-20 08:49:35Z
1373969495

PMQs: Boris Johnson accused by Sir Keir Starmer of 'blaming everyone else' in furious Commons row - Sky News

Sir Keir Starmer has accused Boris Johnson of "blaming everyone else" over partygate during a furious exchange in the Commons.

The Labour leader said the prime minister chose to "slander decent people" in private but lacked the "backbone to repeat it in public".

He claimed that Mr Johnson showed a different attitude "once the cameras were off" during bad-tempered exchanges at Prime Minister's Questions.

Sir Keir accused him of going "back to blaming everyone else" for his woes - including the Archbishop of Canterbury - after his partygate apology.

Politics Hub: Boris Johnson's brewing row with Church

He called it "a mealy mouthed apology when the cameras roll, a vicious attack on those who tell the truth as soon as the cameras are off. Slander decent people in a private room, let the slander spread without the backbone to repeat it in public."

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Tory MP on PM's 'pantomime' meeting

His comments centred on reports that Mr Johnson had criticised the archbishop, Justin Welby, at a closed-door meeting of Tory backbenchers hours after his Commons appearance.

Sir Keir also pointed out that the prime minister's spin doctor Allegra Stratton, COVID adviser Professor Neil Ferguson and health secretary Matt Hancock had all resigned over their actions during the pandemic.

He asked: "Why does the prime minister think everybody else's actions have consequences except his own?"

More on Boris Johnson

Mr Johnson hit back by accusing Sir Keir of being "in some kind of Doctor Who time warp" and describing him as a "Corbynista in a smart Islington suit".

Sir Keir said the prime minister had attacked BBC coverage of the invasion of Ukraine - but Mr Johnson said this claim showed that the Labour leader was "out of his tiny mind".

It was the second day of pressure from MPs on Mr Johnson over partygate, after he apologised to the Commons on Tuesday following his fine last week for breaking lockdown rules.

Boris Johnson
Image: Boris Johnson said Sir Keir Starmer was a 'Corbynista in a smart Islington suit'

Sir Keir said: "Yesterday's apology lasted for as long as the prime minister thought necessary to be clipped for the news.

"But once the cameras were off the prime minister went to see his backbenchers and he was back to blaming everyone else.

"He even said that the Archbishop of Canterbury had not been critical enough of Putin.

"In fact, the archbishop called Putin's war an act of great evil."

Mr Johnson faced fresh calls to resign from other opposition MPs including the SNP's Richard Thomson, who was told to withdraw his description of Mr Johnson as a "Pinocchio prime minister" whom the public want to see "pack his bags and go".

Plaid Cymru's Westminster leader Liz Saville Roberts asked Mr Johnson whether he will support a law banning "lying in politics".

He replied: "It is well known that the rules of this House demand that we tell the truth in this House and that's what we try to do."

Follow the Daily podcast on Apple Podcasts,  Google Podcasts,  Spotify, Spreaker

Sky's deputy political editor Sam Coates said the prime minister was trying to move on from partygate but that Sir Keir "clearly got under the prime minister's skin".

"Keir Starmer was on better form and Boris Johnson arguably slightly tetchier form than I can remember for some time," he said.

"Keir Starmer did what he doesn't always do which is to have quite specific questions which clearly got under the prime minister's skin."

On Thursday the prime minister will face a vote on a motion tabled by opposition parties calling for parliament's privileges committee to investigate whether he misled the House with his initial claims that no rules were broken during partygate - though Mr Johnson himself will be in India.

The wording of the motion - which will need to attract the support of some Tory MPs to succeed - orders that the investigation cannot begin until police inquiries into partygate have concluded.

What is the Privileges Committee and will it investigate Boris Johnson?

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer has tabled a motion, backed by other opposition parties, calling for the PM to be investigated for misleading Parliament.

A debate and vote will be held on Thursday, despite Boris Johnson due to be on an official visit to India at that time.

The motion calls for the prime minister to be investigated by the Committee of Privileges - a panel of seven MPs, which has a Conservative majority but is chaired by Labour's Chris Bryant.

The committee has responsibility for investigating issues relating to contempt of parliament.

It has the power to request reports and documents, meaning they could in theory ask Downing Street for the final report by senior civil servant Sue Gray, or any photos taken by the PM's official photographer.

However, because the Conservatives have a majority of 75 it would require a huge rebellion for the motion to be passed by MPs.

Currently, there are not thought to be enough Tory MPs ready to turn on Mr Johnson for this to be likely.

But Labour clearly believes there is sufficient political capital to be gained for them to push ahead with it anyway.

Sir Keir said: “The British public know that the rules were broken in Downing Street.

"Voting to say otherwise won’t persuade the public that everything was fine but will further damage the reputation of any Conservative MP who is happy to say it was one rule for the public and another for this government."

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMipQFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9wbXFzLWJvcmlzLWpvaG5zb24tYWNjdXNlZC1ieS1zaXIta2Vpci1zdGFybWVyLW9mLXNsYW5kZXJpbmctZGVjZW50LXBlb3BsZS1pbi1wcml2YXRlLWJ1dC1sYWNraW5nLWJhY2tib25lLXRvLXJlcGVhdC1pdC1pbi1wdWJsaWMtMTI1OTQzNTXSAakBaHR0cHM6Ly9uZXdzLnNreS5jb20vc3RvcnkvYW1wL3BtcXMtYm9yaXMtam9obnNvbi1hY2N1c2VkLWJ5LXNpci1rZWlyLXN0YXJtZXItb2Ytc2xhbmRlcmluZy1kZWNlbnQtcGVvcGxlLWluLXByaXZhdGUtYnV0LWxhY2tpbmctYmFja2JvbmUtdG8tcmVwZWF0LWl0LWluLXB1YmxpYy0xMjU5NDM1NQ?oc=5

2022-04-20 13:34:01Z
1392925887

Boris Johnson: Tory MPs told to block inquiry into Downing Street parties - The Times

Boris Johnson will order his MPs tomorrow to block an investigation into claims that he misled parliament over lockdown-breaking parties in Downing Street.

The prime minister offered a “wholehearted apology” yesterday after being issued with a fixed-penalty notice for attending a gathering in the cabinet room to celebrate his 56th birthday.

Johnson insisted, however, that he had not misled the Commons when he said last December that Covid rules were followed at all times in Downing Street. “It did not occur to me, then or subsequently, that a gathering in the cabinet room just before a vital meeting on Covid strategy could amount to a breach of the rules,” he said.

Johnson apologises to Commons over partygate fines

At a meeting of Tory MPs last night, Johnson again expressed “genuine regret” but

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMieWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRoZXRpbWVzLmNvLnVrL2FydGljbGUvYm9yaXMtam9obnNvbi10b3J5LW1wcy10b2xkLXRvLWJsb2NrLWlucXVpcnktZG93bmluZy1zdHJlZXQtbG9ja2Rvd24tcGFydGllcy1obGZqcXBoMmbSAQA?oc=5

2022-04-20 08:45:00Z
1360428059

Selasa, 19 April 2022

Rwanda asylum seeker policy: Ex-PM Theresa May criticises government plan - BBC

Theresa May

Former prime minister Theresa May has criticised the government's plan to send some asylum seekers to Rwanda.

Mrs May told the Commons she did not support the policy due to her concerns over whether it met standards on "legality, practicality and efficacy".

Home Secretary Priti Patel said the scheme would be "a major blow to people smugglers" and would stop people dying on dangerous routes to the UK.

The policy has been criticised by charities and opposition parties.

Mrs May, who also served as home secretary overseeing the UK's immigration policy between 2010 and 2016, asked if the trial scheme would lead to an increase in trafficking of women and children - after reports that only single men making illegal crossings to the UK would be sent to Rwanda.

Under the scheme - announced last week - people deemed to have entered the UK unlawfully will be flown to the African country, where they would be processed, and if successful, would have long-term accommodation in the African country.

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Responding to a statement on migration by Ms Patel, Mrs May said: "From what I have heard and seen so far of this policy, I do not support the removal to Rwanda policy on the grounds of legality, practicality and efficacy.

"If it is the case that families will not be broken up, does she not believe and where is her evidence that this will not simply lead to an increase in the trafficking of women and children?"

But Ms Patel defended the policy saying: "Change is needed because people are dying attempting to come to the UK."

She told MPs: "This partnership is the type of international co-operation needed to make the global immigration system fairer, keep people safe, and give them opportunities to flourish.

"This will help break the people smugglers' business model and prevent the loss of life, while ensuring protection for those who are genuinely vulnerable."

line
Map showing the distance from the UK to Rwanda

How would the Rwanda trial scheme work?

  • According to a memorandum of understanding between the two governments, the UK would screen asylum seekers "without delay" after their arrival in the UK and then provide Rwanda with basic details of each person it wanted to transfer
  • Rwanda would have to approve all requests before they were transferred, and the arrangement would last for five years.
  • After arriving in Rwanda each asylum seeker would be given accommodation and support and would be free to come and go from their accommodation at all times, the memorandum says.
  • If successfully processed, the asylum seeker would be offered long-term accommodation in the African country
  • The UK would also resettle "a portion of Rwanda's most vulnerable refugees" in the UK.
line

Shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper condemned the policy as "unworkable, unethical and extortionate" and said it was designed to "distract from years of failure" to tackle illegal immigration.

Ms Cooper highlighted the lack of information from the home secretary on costs.

She said: "Will she admit the £120m she has announced doesn't pay for a single person to be transferred.

"She hasn't actually got an agreement on the price for each person. In fact, the £120m is the eyewatering price the Home Office is paying just for a press release."

The home secretary added that some of the tone used to describe the UK's partnership with Rwanda was "quite xenophobic".

Ms Patel personally pushed through the scheme with a rare "ministerial direction", meaning she has taken responsibility for it.

She had to personally approve the scheme after her officials voiced concern over the lack of evidence to demonstrate value for money.

It is only the second time in 30 years that the power has been used.

Last year, 28,526 people are known to have crossed the English Channel in small boats, up from 8,404 in 2020.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiJmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLTYxMTUzNjc30gEqaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstNjExNTM2NzcuYW1w?oc=5

2022-04-19 16:34:22Z
1371042462