Sabtu, 25 November 2023

The people who will decide the next general election - The Telegraph

Election strategists cannot resist constructing an archetype that their party needs to win over. For Tony Blair it was Mondeo Man, for Boris Johnson it was Waitrose Woman, David Cameron had Worcester Woman and Margaret Thatcher had Essex Man.

In reality, of course, there are multiple demographic groups that make up target voters for each party, and as speculation mounts of an election as soon as May next year, they are busily gathering data to define them. 

The Tories have Isaac Levido, the campaign manager credited with masterminding the 2019 landslide, coming back full-time in the party’s headquarters, it was announced this week.

The Telegraph, though, has already done the hard work for them, by teaming up with pollsters and strategic consultants JL Partners to identify the voters that will decide whether Rishi Sunak or Sir Keir Starmer leads Britain into the second half of the decade.

The research shows that Starmer can bank on around 14.7 million hardcore Labour voters, compared with just 8.3 million rock solid Tory voters, but he could still lose the election if those solid Labour votes pile up in safe seats rather than in marginals.

That’s why both sides will be fighting so hard to win over the four categories of undecided voters identified here. If Sunak could win all of them over, which this month’s Cabinet reshuffle and Autumn Statement tax cut were designed to help achieve, he would have 17.5 million votes.

Altogether, the six groups detailed here account for 32.2 million voters, which would represent a typical general election turnout from an electorate of 46.5 million.

For the Conservatives and Labour, the most important factors are the political issues that matter most to each archetype, and the constituency that they live in. 

By making a cold calculation of how many votes they can scoop up by tailoring individual policies to voters’ concerns, they can fine-tune their manifestos and campaign strategies.

And by cross-referencing those voter concerns with geographical areas, they can decide where to concentrate resources by identifying constituencies that will become swing seats in 2024 and deprioritising safe seats or lost causes.

In its research, JL Partners has also built up a fascinating picture of not only where voters live and what they care about, but also who they are: where they shop, what they watch on TV, what kind of car they drive (or not), where they go on holiday, how much they earn and what kind of home they live in.

James Johnson, co-founder of JL Partners, says: “Come 2024, both parties will be aiming to win Middle England. But at this election, Middle England has a few different faces. 

“If you are Rishi Sunak, you are after those who voted Conservative in 2019 who now either say they do not know how they would vote or that they are opting for Reform UK. This group has very socially conservative values and doesn’t have much time for Labour. If the Tories win them back, then suddenly Labour’s lead is significantly reduced and the election looks a lot closer.”

If Sunak proves that he can walk the walk as well as talk the talk on immigration, he could secure up to 1.9 million votes among people for whom immigration is top of their list of election issues.

They are people who voted Leave, two-thirds of them are over 55 and almost eight in 10 are homeowners, with the majority having already paid off their mortgage.

Despite being more asset-rich than the population as a whole, they often struggle to pay their bills, with four in 10 living on an income of £25,000 or less, making this group slightly less affluent than average.

Many of them live in former Red Wall seats where they lent their vote to Boris Johnson in 2019 to “Get Brexit Done”, but are now wavering or considering not voting at all.

Because this group ranks immigration so highly, some are talking about switching to Reform UK, the re-badged Brexit Party now led by Richard Tice after Nigel Farage stepped down in 2021.

For Sunak, the difference between winning and losing marginal seats could well be determined by whether the Right-wing vote is split between the Tories and Reform in seats like Blyth Valley, which switched from Labour to the Tories in 2019 with a majority of just 712

The Brexit Party polled more than 3,000 votes and came third that year; if its successor could persuade just 2 per cent of Tory voters to switch to Reform it would be enough, based on the 2019 result, to allow Labour through the middle.

The task for Sunak if he wants to win over these voters is clear: get migrant-processing flights to Rwanda off the ground before the next election, and, if necessary, make a manifesto pledge to leave the European Convention on Human Rights. The emergency legislation he announced to keep the Rwanda plan alive after the Supreme Court ruled it illegal is now all the more important if he wants to count on this group’s support.

Like Stop the Boats Steve, Retiring Rita is a 2019 Conservative voter who has become disenchanted with the Tories and currently does not know how or whether she will vote.

For her, the NHS and the cost of living are priorities, and the way of winning her over is less straightforward than simply cracking down on immigration.

This group is far more diverse than the Stop the Boats archetype, with 41 per cent working full-time, 33 per cent retired and an even distribution between working class and middle class. Despite its name, the female/male split is 57 per cent to 43 per cent.

Although 60 per cent of them live in rural constituencies, 42 per cent live in London or within commuting distance of London. 

Three-quarters of this group own their own homes, of whom more than four in 10 have paid off their mortgage, and car ownership is higher than in the population at large.

If Sunak is to win back these voters, he will have to restore the feelgood factor on the economy, which he hopes to do by bringing inflation down further. This would allow the Bank of England to consider cutting interest rates in the medium term and increase consumer confidence.

Inflation has had such a profound effect on the cost of living that people will still be paying higher prices in 2024 than they were in 2022, even if inflation does continue to fall, but optimism plays such a huge part in voters’ economic outlook that simply showing that the worst is over might be enough to restore the Tories’ reputation for competence.

Showing real progress on the NHS will be a tougher nut to crack, with waiting lists predicted to rise to 8 million in the coming months, rather than falling as Sunak promised they would do. This is the task given to new Health Secretary Victoria Atkins. 

Toyota Tony is the definitive swing voter at the next election. He drove his sensible, reliable and affordable Japanese car to the polling station in 2019 and voted Tory because he liked the look of Boris Johnson, but he now feels let down and is intending to vote Labour or Lib Dem.

His biggest concern is the economy and the cost of living, as he is a middle-class working man with a mortgage to pay off, and he blames the Conservatives, and in particular Liz Truss, for the mess that the economy is now in.

There will be a three-way fight over the 2.2 million voters who fall into this category, as they are mulling over a vote for Labour or the Lib Dems, while the Tories will still hope they can win some of them back if Sunak and his Chancellor Jeremy Hunt can turn the economy around.

The bad news for Sunak is that Labour leads in the opinion polls on the economy, the cost of living and the NHS – another key concern for this group. Number 10 might well have had this group in mind with its centrist reshuffle last week.

Expect all three parties to target these voters in constituencies like High Peak in Derbyshire, which has changed hands three times in the past 18 years and is currently held by the Tories with a majority of just 590.

Until 2010, the Lib Dems were pulling in more than 20 per cent of the vote in High Peak: their vote share plunged after they went into coalition with the Conservatives, but they will hope that they can continue recent strong showings in by-elections and pick up votes from disaffected Tories who cannot bring themselves to vote Labour.

Losing this group would hit Sunak particularly hard: with a quarter of them earning £50,000 to £70,000 and a tenth earning £100,000 or more, this should be solid Conservative territory.

Just as Sunak risks losing millions of 2019 voters in the form of Toyota Tony, so Starmer risks losing millions of 2019 Labour voters characterised by Remainer Ruth.

As things stand, this group of 3.2 million people – enough to tip the balance in Starmer’s favour on their own – are talking about voting Labour but their allegiance is soft.

Many of them preferred Jeremy Corbyn to Starmer or are first-time voters with Left-wing views who chanted for Corbyn at Glastonbury in 2017. 

The Israel-Hamas war has added a further complication to Starmer’s ability to keep these voters on board, as they are troubled by his stance on the conflict and his refusal to call for a ceasefire, and many will have attended pro-Palestine marches in recent weeks.

Their strong views on Gaza, coupled with their hatred of Brexit, make the Lib Dems an attractive alternative.

Ruth is typically a city-dwelling graduate who lives in a rented home, uses public transport and is under 35, and she is also considering voting Green or, if she lives outside England, SNP or Plaid Cymru.

Her biggest priority is the NHS, though the cost of living is also a concern and net zero is firmly on her radar.

Ruth likes to treat herself with groceries from Waitrose and enjoys city breaks in places like Copenhagen, where she will stay in an Airbnb apartment.

Starmer will need to hang on to this group if he wants to regain marginal seats like Kensington in west London, where Labour’s Emma Dent Coad lost her seat to Conservative Felicity Buchan in 2019 by just 150 votes. The Lib Dems and the Greens came third and fourth respectively, and a defection from Labour to either of these parties could be enough to ruin Labour’s chances.

The most solid block of Tory votes is personified by M&S Mike, a middle-aged, middle-class man who drives his BMW to Marks & Spencer to do his shopping.

Mike lives in the East or South East, in constituencies like Southend West (Tory majority 14,459), Beaconsfield (Tory majority 15,712) and Maldon (where tourism minister Sir John Whittingdale has a majority of 30,041).

But he also lives in places like Chesham and Amersham, where Tory MP Cheryl Gillan held a majority of 16,223 before her death in 2021, which was wiped out by the Lib Dems with a 25 per cent swing at the resulting by-election. 

If Sunak is to win back seats like Chesham and Amersham, which have been lost in by-elections since 2019, he will need M&S Mike and his friends to turn out to vote. The Lib Dems’ victory in 2021 was achieved with a turnout of just 52 per cent, compared with the 77 per cent who voted in 2019. Thousands of Tory voters appear to have stayed at home to register their disgruntlement (Labour came fourth with a pathetic 622 votes in the by-election, suggesting most of their supporters voted tactically to get the Lib Dems in), so if Sunak can tempt them back to the polling booths he stands a chance of stealing these seats back.

M&S Mike, like Stop the Boats Steve, places immigration at or near the top of his list of priorities for the next election, which emphasises why it is so important for Sunak to show a firm hand on the small boats crisis, and why he had, until recently, been keeping the tough-talking Suella Braverman in place as home secretary despite criticism from Tory centrists.

If M&S Mike and his friends stay at home on polling day, Sunak will be on the wrong end of an almighty Labour landslide.

JL Partners The biggest archetype of all is represented by NHS Nicky, and the good news for Starmer is that she is solidly Labour.

Nicky (though this group is almost evenly split between men and women) is typically in her early 40s or younger, works in the public sector and lives in the north of England or a Labour-supporting London borough. Like Remainer Ruth, her biggest concern is the NHS, which might also be her employer.

She uses public transport if she can, but drives a Toyota or a Kia to work if she does not live on a bus or train route. By shopping at discount store Lidl, she is able to put aside enough money for an annual holiday to a sunny destination like the Algarve, flying with Ryanair or on a Tui package deal.

NHS Nicky can be found living in constituencies like Liverpool Walton (Labour majority 30,520), Manchester Gorton (Labour majority 30,339) or Tottenham, where shadow foreign secretary David Lammy has a 30,175 majority.

JL Partners calculates that 14.7 million people fall into this group, providing Starmer with a launchpad for victory if he can win over just one of the four groups of floating voters.

James Johnson of JL Partners says there is one caveat, however, that might make the various groups meaningless.

He says: “Although it is unlikely, if Labour really does maintain a 15-plus percentage point lead through to election day, then these segments may well fall to one side. 

“When parties win big, they ride a wave of general positive feeling almost regardless of how the exact contours of the electorate look. In that scenario, a red wave will raise the tide pretty evenly.”


JL Partners is publishing this research to coincide with the launch of its new 20:24 offer, providing research and strategic advice on elections taking place globally next year – including Britain and the US – that will impact financial markets and policy decisions around the world

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiZWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRlbGVncmFwaC5jby51ay9wb2xpdGljcy8yMDIzLzExLzI1L3RoZS1wZW9wbGUtd2hvLXdpbGwtZGVjaWRlLXRoZS1uZXh0LWdlbmVyYWwtZWxlY3Rpb24v0gEA?oc=5

2023-11-25 07:00:00Z
CBMiZWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRlbGVncmFwaC5jby51ay9wb2xpdGljcy8yMDIzLzExLzI1L3RoZS1wZW9wbGUtd2hvLXdpbGwtZGVjaWRlLXRoZS1uZXh0LWdlbmVyYWwtZWxlY3Rpb24v0gEA

Jumat, 24 November 2023

Labour unlikely to meet its £28bn green pledge at all - BBC

Shadow chancellor Rachel ReevesEPA

It is unlikely a Labour government will be able to meet its ambition to spend £28bn a year on green initiatives, a source close to Sir Keir Starmer has told the BBC.

Labour announced the flagship policy at its annual conference in 2021.

But in June shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves watered the pledge down, saying the figure would not be reached until 2027.

Now, it is understood the figure will probably not be reached at all.

A senior source in the Labour leader's office said that was because of the state of the public finances. They stressed that Labour's fiscal rules were more important than any policy.

The Conservatives have previously warned of the alleged dangers of the policy - claiming extra borrowing could increase interest rates and mortgage costs.

During the Labour party conference in Brighton two years ago, Ms Reeves announced her ambition to be the UK's first "green" chancellor.

She unveiled Labour's Green Prosperity Plan, explaining money would go on offshore wind farms, planting trees and developing batteries. She added it would be funded by borrowing.

But in June Ms Reeves said she took the decision to scale back the Green Prosperity Plan as a result of the poor state of the economy.

"No plan can be built that is not a rock of economic and fiscal responsibility," Ms Reeves told BBC Radio 4's Today programme at the time.

She added. "I will never play fast and loose with the public finances."

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Five months on, there are major doubts at the top of the Labour party about the prospect of ever hitting that level of investment due to the state of the public finances.

This is because the party's fiscal rules - which include a promise to get debt falling within five years - are viewed as the "North Star"; more important than any policy, according to the senior Labour source who spoke to the BBC.

Another Labour source told the Telegraph: "The fiscal rule matters more, and that will dictate how much is in the green prosperity fund."

Labour is determined to paint itself as the party of economic credibility - even if it means tempering one of the central planks of its programme for government.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTY3NTI4ODk00gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNjc1Mjg4OTQuYW1w?oc=5

2023-11-25 04:55:08Z
CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTY3NTI4ODk00gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNjc1Mjg4OTQuYW1w

Lord Cameron says UK must engage with China - BBC

Britain's former Prime Minister and newly appointed Foreign Secretary David Cameron walks outside 10 Downing StreetReuters

Lord Cameron has defended his pro-China policy as prime minister, insisting that it is still right to "engage" with Beijing.

In his first full interview since becoming foreign secretary, Lord Cameron said China is key to solving big issues like climate change.

The comments risk angering Tory MPs, some of whom China has sanctioned.

But he told the BBC he supported the government's current "realistic, hard-headed policy" towards China.

In a wide-ranging conversation, Lord Cameron also denied he had become foreign secretary because he was bored.

"Being prime minister for six years was a good apprenticeship for being foreign secretary," he said.

Lord Cameron has been criticised for his close involvement with Chinese investment in recent years.

He has given speeches praising a port development in Sri Lanka owned ultimately by a Chinese state company.

He tried to set up a £1bn China-Investment fund. And he met senior Chinese figures on visits to Beijing.

This has raised fears among some MPs that Lord Cameron could seek to soften the government's attitude towards China.

'Wolf warrior diplomacy'

But he told the BBC the world had changed since he was prime minister.

"China has become much more aggressive, much more assertive, over the Uighurs, over Hong Kong, the 'wolf warrior' diplomacy," he said.

"And so that's why security and protection is such an important part of our policy.

"We also need to align more carefully with our allies to make sure we can counter any malign threats coming from China. So, it is a realistic hard headed policy."

But he defended his previous policy in Downing Street that sought a new "golden era" in Sino-UK relations.

He said: "When I became prime minister, the greatest need was for Britain to grow again, trade again, with exports to help our businesses around the world.

"I loaded up planes, I took them to India, I took them to China, I took them to Africa to get the economy moving again."

And the government, he said, should still deal with Beijing today.

"Engaging China is one part of the approach we need to take," he said.

"Not least, because China is a fifth of humanity. We're not going to solve challenges like climate change, unless we engage.

"And hopefully I can be a part of that."

avid Cameron with Chinese President Xi Jinping at The Plough Inn at Cadsden in Princes Risborough, near to Cameron's country retreat at Chequers
PA Media

Lord Cameron also risked angering pro-Brexit Tory MPs by saying Britain should engage more closely with the European Union on foreign, defence and security policy.

He said Britain had decided not to be a member of the EU but had to be "a friend, a neighbour and the best possible partner" and the UK had to make that work.

"When you look at the engagement in Ukraine, that probably is the best example of how it's worked," he said.

"There's no doubt that Britain is the leading European power in helping Ukraine.

"I heard that over and over again from the president downwards. But we're doing that in partnership with our European colleagues.

"So, I think we can make friend, neighbour and partner work. And I'm determined to do so."

Supporting Sunak

Even in his first few days back in office, Lord Cameron has been a strong advocate for boosting Britain's international development policy.

But he suggested he would not push for a return to the target of spending 0.7% of national income on foreign aid.

"I took this job accepting collective Cabinet responsibility," he said.

Lord Cameron gave his "100% support" to the government's Rwanda migration policy, saying "we have to do what it takes to break the model of the people smugglers".

He said: "What I'm absolutely ready to do is to support the government's policy and 100% because we have got to stop the boats.

"And I don't say this glibly. I know that there's nothing more destructive to a country's immigration system and immigration policy than large scale, very visible illegal migration.

"And that is what we have. That's what we got to stop.

"Now the number of small boat crossings is down by a third. But we have to do whatever it takes to break the model of the people's workers."

Asked if he was willing to countenance pulling Britain out of the European Convention on Human Rights, he ignored the question and said: "I'm very happy to say I 100% support the government policy and whatever it takes."

Related Topics

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTY3NTE3OTU10gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNjc1MTc5NTUuYW1w?oc=5

2023-11-24 19:21:21Z
CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTY3NTE3OTU10gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNjc1MTc5NTUuYW1w

No other country would prosecute someone trying to save lives, says Met chief as crash officer cleared - The Telegraph

The decision to prosecute an armed officer who crashed while racing to the scene of a terrorist attack in London has been described as “appalling” by the Metropolitan Police Commissioner.

Sir Mark Rowley said no other country in the world would haul one of its most highly trained officers before the courts for bravely trying to preserve life, calling for the system of accountability to be urgently reviewed.

His comments came after a jury at Southwark Crown Court cleared Pc Paul Fisher of dangerous driving following a six-day trial.

The 46-year-old firearms officer had been responding to a stabbing spree by terrorist Sudesh Amman in Streatham, south London, in February 2020 when he lost control of his unmarked BMW X5 and hit two other cars and a wall.

Pc Paul Fisher was responding to the stabbing spree when he lost control of his unmarked BMW X5 and hit two other cars and a wall

It took almost four years for the case to come to court, but Mr Fisher was cleared by a jury after five hours of deliberations.

Amman, who was under surveillance by counter-terrorism police, stabbed two members of the public with a knife he grabbed from a hardware store. Little over a minute later, he was shot dead by armed undercover officers.

Mr Fisher had been on a surveillance operation with two other armed officers at the time of the crash, in which two members of the public suffered minor injuries.

While he admitted letting people down with the “split-second error”, he vehemently denied dangerous driving. Kevin Baumber, his barrister, said: “The last thing intended was any kind of harm at all. Not all collisions are crimes.”

In a statement issued after the verdict, Sir Mark said: “If an officer makes honest mistakes under the most immense pressure while rushing to a live terrorist incident, it cannot be right this is dealt with by a criminal trial nearly four years later. That’s why the treatment of this brave officer by the systems of accountability is appalling.

“No other country in the world would haul one of its most highly trained officers before a court for responding to one of the most serious incidents we can deal with and doing their utmost to preserve life.

“The driving errors made by Pc Fisher were made under the most intense pressure while trying to protect members of the public from a terrorist. The right answer would have been a rapid review of this incident, warnings, re-training and testing. Instead, there have been almost four years of stress.

“I routinely hear from officers who avoid pursuits or indeed even being trained because they know their split-second, pressured decisions will be unpicked over many years. This case further undermines the confidence of all officers using their powers to keep the public safe.

“The system has to change. The alternative is colleagues becoming more scared of an imbalanced and disproportionate system than they are of facing terrorists and criminals intent on attacking communities.”

Armed officers at the scene of the Streatham attack in 2020 Credit: Metropolitan Police

Sir Mark said that officers “fully expect to be held accountable for their actions, but they need to know the system holding them to account will be swift, fair, competent, and recognise the split-second decisions made every single day. The current set-up clearly fails those tests”.

He said he was “very grateful the Home Office and Attorney General are conducting a thorough review to find a more appropriate balance for accountability. We will continue to support their officials in any way possible through this process”.

Following the verdict, Ken Marsh, the chairman of the Metropolitan Police Federation, said: “Frankly this case should never have got to court.

“It’s perverse that a police officer doing the job the public would expect – namely courageously heading towards the danger of a terrorist attack – could find themselves in the dock with their career on the line.

“Let’s remember our colleagues put their lives in danger that day to protect the public. It is what we do. The public will rightly be appalled that brave police officers responding to a terrorist attack can be treated in such a manner.

“We must do better, or we risk a society where police officers will be left questioning whether they should head towards that danger. That potential hesitation – caused by the hindsight brigade – will cost lives.

“That can’t be right. We now ask that Pc Paul Fisher is allowed to carry on his career and do the job the public expect of him.”

A CPS spokesman said: “The CPS does not decide whether a person is guilty of a criminal offence – we make fair, independent and objective assessments about whether it is appropriate to present charges for the court to consider.

“In this case, we decided it was appropriate for a court to consider one charge of dangerous driving. The jury found the defendant not guilty and we respect its verdict.”

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiZmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRlbGVncmFwaC5jby51ay9uZXdzLzIwMjMvMTEvMjQvbWFyay1yb3dsZXktcHJvc2VjdXRpb24tb2YtcG9saWNlbWFuLXRlcnJvci1hdHRhY2stbG9uZG9uL9IBAA?oc=5

2023-11-24 15:45:00Z
2627124190

Sunak faces Tory backlash as net migration to UK hits record high - The Guardian

Rishi Sunak is facing a backlash from his own ministers after figures revealed that legal migration to the UK is at an all-time high.

The immigration minister, Robert Jenrick, is understood to be pushing for a five-point migration plan that includes proposals to ban foreign social care workers from bringing in any dependants and a cap on the total number of NHS and social care visas.

Other cabinet ministers are said to be demanding a crackdown on visas for overseas workers relocating to the UK to work for the NHS or in the care sector, while the Daily Telegraph says Conservative MPs are demanding “immediate and massive” action.

Official figures published on Thursday showed net migration – the difference between people legally arriving in the country and those emigrating – peaking at 745,000 in the year to December 2022, which was a record high according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS). The data places migration levels at three times higher than before Brexit.

Jenrick’s plan is said to include proposals to scrap the shortage occupation list, a programme that allows foreign workers to be paid 20% below the going rate in roles where there is a shortage of skilled workers.

The government’s migration advisory committee has already recommended the abolition of the list amid fears it is being used to bring cheap foreign labour into the UK.

Calls to curb the number of foreign workers in the NHS and social care are likely to be met with resistance by health officials amid chronic staff shortages across the health and care sector.

ONS data for the year to June 2023 shows a lower net migration figure of 672,000. Though this was a year-on-year increase of 65,000, it has led to speculation that net migration may be on a downward trend, though the ONS said it was too early to tell.

The increase in net migration in the year to June 2023 was driven by an increase in people and their families arriving for work, notably in NHS and social care roles.

There were 322,000 work-related visas issued for this period, up from 198,000 in the year to June 2022. Nearly two-thirds of work visas went to Indian, Nigerian and Zimbabwean nationals, suggesting non-EU workers are replacing EU workers in sectors of the economy that are struggling to recruit staff since Brexit.

The backbench Tory MP Suella Braverman, who was home secretary for a year before she was sacked earlier this month, said on social media: “Today’s record numbers are a slap in the face to the British public who have voted to control and reduce migration at every opportunity. We must act now to reduce migration to sustainable levels. Brexit gave us the tools. It’s time to use them.”

Braverman’s successor as home secretary, James Cleverly, told the Times: “This figure is not showing a significant increase from last year’s figures and is largely in line with our immigration statistics.”

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMicWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRoZWd1YXJkaWFuLmNvbS91ay1uZXdzLzIwMjMvbm92LzI0L3N1bmFrLWZhY2VzLXRvcnktYmFja2xhc2gtYXMtbmV0LW1pZ3JhdGlvbi10by11ay1oaXRzLXJlY29yZC1oaWdo0gFxaHR0cHM6Ly9hbXAudGhlZ3VhcmRpYW4uY29tL3VrLW5ld3MvMjAyMy9ub3YvMjQvc3VuYWstZmFjZXMtdG9yeS1iYWNrbGFzaC1hcy1uZXQtbWlncmF0aW9uLXRvLXVrLWhpdHMtcmVjb3JkLWhpZ2g?oc=5

2023-11-24 08:04:00Z
2619931428

Kamis, 23 November 2023

Sunak under pressure as net migration to UK hits record 745,000 - Financial Times

What is included in my trial?

During your trial you will have complete digital access to FT.com with everything in both of our Standard Digital and Premium Digital packages.

Standard Digital includes access to a wealth of global news, analysis and expert opinion. Premium Digital includes access to our premier business column, Lex, as well as 15 curated newsletters covering key business themes with original, in-depth reporting. For a full comparison of Standard and Premium Digital, click here.

Change the plan you will roll onto at any time during your trial by visiting the “Settings & Account” section.

What happens at the end of my trial?

If you do nothing, you will be auto-enrolled in our premium digital monthly subscription plan and retain complete access for $69 per month.

For cost savings, you can change your plan at any time online in the “Settings & Account” section. If you’d like to retain your premium access and save 20%, you can opt to pay annually at the end of the trial.

You may also opt to downgrade to Standard Digital, a robust journalistic offering that fulfils many user’s needs. Compare Standard and Premium Digital here.

Any changes made can be done at any time and will become effective at the end of the trial period, allowing you to retain full access for 4 weeks, even if you downgrade or cancel.

When can I cancel?

You may change or cancel your subscription or trial at any time online. Simply log into Settings & Account and select "Cancel" on the right-hand side.

You can still enjoy your subscription until the end of your current billing period.

What forms of payment can I use?

We support credit card, debit card and PayPal payments.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiP2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZ0LmNvbS9jb250ZW50LzlhYzUyM2RhLTFjMTUtNDNlOC05Y2NjLWJiZmRiY2U0Yjc0YdIBAA?oc=5

2023-11-23 17:33:22Z
2619931428

Reading fire: Crane operator rescues worker next to burning high-rise - BBC

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

A crane operator has rescued a worker from a roof close to a burning building.

Firefighters were called to the Station Hill development in Reading, which has since been cordoned off, at 11:40 GMT.

Video footage from social media shows a person being lifted by a crane from the roof of a building, prompting applause from a crowd below.

Crane operator Glen Edwards said it had been a "very close call" due to swirling winds.

"I looked out my left-hand window and saw a guy standing on the corner of the building," said the 65-year-old, from Egham, Surrey.

"I'd only just seen him and someone said 'can you get the cage on', so that was it, I got the cage on and got it over to him the best I could.

"I tried to put the cage down between him and the flames, but I was hampered by the wind swirling around there.

"But I got the cage down and I managed to get him in there."

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

The blaze, which created a huge amount of black smoke, has now been been put out by Royal Berkshire Fire and Rescue Service.

Group Manager Chris Hearn said during the incident another person was also rescued using a crane.

South Central Ambulance Service said two people were taken to the Royal Berkshire Hospital to be treated for smoke inhalation, but neither case was severe.

Local residents and businesses were urged to avoid the area, stay indoors and to keep windows closed.

More than 50 firefighters attended the blaze, along with the air ambulance and an incident command unit.

Tom Canning, who was on his way to a meeting, and said there were crowds of people watching the fire from below.

He said: "I worked out as I walked closer to my office that it was the new development on Station Hill - it looked horrific, just massive plumes of black smoke.

"The crane operator was just incredibly brave to rescue that worker."

Black smoke, Reading fire

Steve Reynolds works in a building 100 yards away from where the fire started.

He said: "I saw a black cloud go up and a ball of flames happen and all of a sudden I could see there was a guy trapped on the corner.

"There were bits of glass falling off the side of the building and he was completely exposed up there.

"Then all of a sudden a crane came out from the left with a carriage on it and they lowered it down… and he gets in and they pull him away.

"There was a massive cheer from all the workers on the ground. It was pretty terrifying."

Peter, who runs a local café, said the fire was "really quite dramatic - thick billowing smoke and lots of flames".

"We immediately got rid of all our customers - that's all we could think to do," he said.

Aaron, who was a bystander, said it was the "most devastating thing" he had seen in his life.

"I thought the flames and smoke were going to break the glass," he added.

black smoke billowing from building
Paul Hunsdon

Another witness said: "I was in the next door building, there was a guy standing up there, luckily the crane came in just in time.

"He was coughing [when he came down], from the smoke.

"When he got inside the crane and the crane put him down everyone was clapping.

"The crane operator was very fast. He was still in the crane while the building was on fire."

Redwood Consulting, on behalf of the Station Hill redevelopment project, said: "We activated our fire emergency plans immediately, the emergency services were notified and are currently on site.

"The safety of those on site and the wider public is always our first priority, and the site has been evacuated as a result."

Reading fire
Presentational grey line

Follow BBC South on Facebook, X, or Instagram. Send your story ideas to south.newsonline@bbc.co.uk.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiOGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLWVuZ2xhbmQtYmVya3NoaXJlLTY3NTA5OTc40gE8aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstZW5nbGFuZC1iZXJrc2hpcmUtNjc1MDk5NzguYW1w?oc=5

2023-11-23 15:52:51Z
2633181443