Jumat, 24 Mei 2019

Theresa May to Quit as U.K. Prime Minister - The Wall Street Journal

Britain's Prime Minister Theresa May after announcing her resignation outside 10 Downing Street, London on May 24. Photo: tolga akmen/Agence France-Presse/Getty Images

LONDON—Theresa May said she would quit as British prime minister once her party chooses a successor after failing repeatedly to win parliamentary backing for the Brexit divorce agreement she negotiated with the European Union.

With little prospect of getting her deal passed, three years after the U.K. voted to leave the bloc, Mrs. May said the race to find her replacement would formally begin after she quits as head of her party on June 7.

“It is now clear to me that it is in the best interest of the country for a new prime minister,” she said during a statement on the steps of 10 Downing Street. Mrs. May, her voice breaking, spoke of her sadness at no longer serving as prime minister and urged lawmakers to compromise over Brexit.

The decision formally sets off a race to succeed her as the leader of the Conservative Party and of the government, one that is likely to be won by a supporter of a sharper breakaway from the EU than that embodied in Mrs. May’s deal. Conservative officials aim to select a new leader by the end of July.

After May

If the Conservatives succeed in forcing Theresa May to resign, here’s what needs to happen for the next Prime Minister to take office.

Candidates must be proposed and seconded in writing

If there are more than three candidates, Conservative MPs vote in multiple rounds, with the one gathering the least votes dropping out, until there are two candidates left

All party members get to vote on the remaining two candidates

The new leader would become the new Prime Minister and would not be obliged to call

an early election

Source: House of Commons

Among the questions that loom large for the next prime minister will be whether to push for a no-deal exit from the bloc on Oct. 31 and whether to attempt to break a log jam in Parliament by calling a general election.

“Whoever becomes the new Conservative leader must let the people decide our country’s future, through an immediate General Election,” said opposition Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn on Friday.

Mrs. May, who voted for keeping Britain in the EU, was nominated as prime minister after the 2016 Brexit referendum, promising to deliver a total break with the EU. Unwinding 45 years of trading relations proved hard to deliver, however, and Mrs. May was ultimately trapped between Conservative ministers and lawmakers who wanted an abrupt and total departure from the EU and those who advocated keeping close economic ties with the bloc.

“It is, and will always remain, a matter of deep regret to me that I have not been able to deliver Brexit,” Mrs. May said.

Mrs. May’s effort to forge a middle path ended up alienating both factions. Disenchantment was amplified after she called an election in 2017 that cost the Conservatives their majority in Parliament.

It isn’t clear who will now lead the monumental task of steering the U.K. out of the EU. Conservative lawmakers have been jostling for months to position themselves as future party leaders.

“To succeed, he or she will have to find consensus in Parliament where I have not,” Mrs. May said.

Several of those at the front of the pack, including former Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson and former Brexit Secretary Dominic Raab, advocate a more abrupt split with the EU than the one Mrs. May hoped to secure, raising the possibility of a likely disruptive U.K. exit from the bloc without a deal.

Prime Minister Theresa May pictured with the then-Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson, on June 12, 2017. Photo: Leon Neal/Zuma Press

The pound has been falling against the dollar ahead of the announcement as traders fret about the economic shock of a no-deal Brexit and worry an early election could bring the socialist Labour Party to power.

Investors widely expected Mrs. May’s departure, and the currency edged up less than half a percentage point in the hours after the announcement, trading for $1.271, still close to its lowest point against the dollar all year.

Mrs. May took over as party leader and prime minister after her predecessor David Cameron resigned following the 2016 referendum decision to leave the EU. Her almost three years in charge have been consumed by the effort to take the U.K. out of the EU with the deal she negotiated with the bloc.

Her time in office was punctuated by U-turns and constant political firefighting as she sought to keep her Conservative Party from self-combusting over Britain’s relations with Europe.

Thanks in large part to a hard core of anti-EU lawmakers who said Mrs. May’s deal would keep the U.K. too closely tied to the bloc, she couldn’t push it through Parliament. Brexit has now twice been delayed and the current deadline for quitting the trade bloc is Oct. 31.

The 2016 Brexit referendum, a supposed cathartic process to heal deep divisions in the Conservative Party over the country’s relationship with its biggest trading partner, has instead sowed chaos among Britain’s political class.

On three occasions, Mrs. May tried and failed to get lawmakers to back a divorce deal with the EU. The issue has split both the Conservatives and the opposition Labour Party into groups that believe Brexit should be delivered at all costs; those that think it should only happen on the basis of a deal with the EU; and those that continue to oppose it.

A leadership race will now play out over the summer as Conservative lawmakers vote to whittle potential leaders down to two candidates. The Conservative Party’s 120,000 members then pick their preferred candidate. Conservative members are, on the whole, more in favor of the U.K. leaving with no deal than is the wider pool of Conservative voters.

Under British convention, the prime minister is the leader of the party that commands a majority in the House of Commons, which the minority Conservatives do because they have the backing of the Democratic Unionist Party from Northern Ireland.

Mrs. May’s gradual political demise has given her potential successors ample time to prepare their pitches. Many have already been laying the ground work for the leadership bids. Mr. Johnson, a former foreign secretary who resigned from Mrs. May’s cabinet in protest last year, is a firm favorite to replace her and has already said he would run for leader of the party.

Others, including Mr. Raab and current Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt, have been making a series of wide-ranging speeches. Mr. Johnson’s strident pro-Brexit views chime well with a part of the party, but to get selected he will have to win over more party moderates.

Mr. Johnson has one attribute that Mrs. May crucially lacked: he is seen as a vote winner, analysts and lawmakers say.

Despite proving popular with the Conservative base, Mrs. May saw her tenure quickly turn into a prolonged battle of attrition. No British leader in modern times has endured such a sustained revolt from within his or her own party.

A fifth of all British ministers who quit government since 1979 have done so under Mrs. May’s relatively brief tenure. In January, her Brexit plan suffered the biggest British parliamentary defeat in living memory. By then her own party had already tried and failed to oust her.

A small cadre of Conservative lawmakers quit to join a new centrist grouping in protest of her handling of Brexit, a defection of a sort that is rare in the British political system.

Newsletter Sign-up

Mrs. May interpreted the Brexit vote as a cry to clamp down on EU immigration. Many in her party saw it differently. A cluster of libertarian Conservative lawmakers who run an association called the European Research Group, wanted the U.K. to make a sharp break with the EU and cut regulation. Pro-European Conservatives meanwhile wanted close trading ties with the bloc to bolster the British economy.

Both factions were appalled by the deal Mrs. May hashed out with EU leaders last year to get the U.K. out of the EU. The compromise agreement slackened economic ties with the bloc—creating new obstacles for trade—but still left the U.K. relatively closely bound to the EU. It pleased no one. Her refusal to confront either the Brexiteer or the Europhile contingents in the party ultimately cost her the job as leader.

Meanwhile, voters began to abandon the Conservative Party in droves. The ruling party performed badly in local elections earlier this month and was expected to record its lowest ever national vote tally at elections for the European Parliament on Thursday with the one-issue Brexit Party as the main beneficiary.

Mrs. May’s attempt on Tuesday to win over opposition Labour lawmakers by dangling the prospect of second Brexit referendum only served to harden opposition in Conservative circles against her, precipitating her announcement.

Share Your Thoughts

How should the next prime minister approach Brexit? Join the conversation below.

Write to Max Colchester at max.colchester@wsj.com

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.wsj.com/articles/british-prime-minister-theresa-may-says-she-will-quit-11558688912

2019-05-24 11:12:00Z
CAIiEGuc5yC_YSvNEK56t65GprEqGAgEKg8IACoHCAow1tzJATDnyxUwiK20AQ

Theresa May expected to announce resignation - live updates - CNN International

TOLGA AKMEN/AFP/Getty Images

TOLGA AKMEN/AFP/Getty Images

Here's the full text of May's emotional address.

Ever since I first stepped through the door behind me as Prime Minister, I have striven to make the United Kingdom a country that works not just for a privileged few, but for everyone. And to honor the result of the EU referendum.
Back in 2016, we gave the British people a choice. Against all predictions, the British people voted to leave the European Union. I feel as certain today as I did three years ago that in a democracy, if you give people a choice you have a duty to implement what they decide. I have done my best to do that.
I negotiated the terms of our exit and a new relationship with our closest neighbors that protects jobs, our security and our Union. I have done everything I can to convince MPs to back that deal. Sadly, I have not been able to do so.
I tried three times.
I believe it was right to persevere, even when the odds against success seemed high. But it is now clear to me that it is in the best interests of the country for a new Prime Minister to lead that effort.
So I am today announcing that I will resign as leader of the Conservative and Unionist Party on Friday 7 June so that a successor can be chosen.
I have agreed with the Party Chairman and with the Chairman of the 1922 Committee that the process for electing a new leader should begin in the following week.
I have kept Her Majesty the Queen fully informed of my intentions, and I will continue to serve as her Prime Minister until the process has concluded.
It is, and will always remain, a matter of deep regret to me that I have not been able to deliver Brexit. It will be for my successor to seek a way forward that honors the result of the referendum.
To succeed, he or she will have to find consensus in Parliament where I have not. Such a consensus can only be reached if those on all sides of the debate are willing to compromise.
For many years the great humanitarian Sir Nicholas Winton – who saved the lives of hundreds of children by arranging their evacuation from Nazi-occupied Czechoslovakia through the Kindertransport – was my constituent in Maidenhead.
At another time of political controversy, a few years before his death, he took me to one side at a local event and gave me a piece of advice. He said, ‘Never forget that compromise is not a dirty word. Life depends on compromise.’ He was right.
As we strive to find the compromises we need in our politics – whether to deliver Brexit, or to restore devolved government in Northern Ireland – we must remember what brought us here.
Because the referendum was not just a call to leave the EU but for profound change in our country. A call to make the United Kingdom a country that truly works for everyone. I am proud of the progress we have made over the last three years.
We have completed the work that David Cameron and George Osborne started: the deficit is almost eliminated, our national debt is falling and we are bringing an end to austerity.
My focus has been on ensuring that the good jobs of the future will be created in communities across the whole country, not just in London and the South East, through our Modern Industrial Strategy.
We have helped more people than ever enjoy the security of a job.
We are building more homes and helping first-time buyers onto the housing ladder - so young people can enjoy the opportunities their parents did.
And we are protecting the environment, eliminating plastic waste, tackling climate change and improving air quality.
This is what a decent, moderate and patriotic Conservative Government, on the common ground of British politics, can achieve - even as we tackle the biggest peacetime challenge any government has faced.
I know that the Conservative Party can renew itself in the years ahead. That we can deliver Brexit and serve the British people with policies inspired by our values. Security; freedom; opportunity. Those values have guided me throughout my career.
But the unique privilege of this office is to use this platform to give a voice to the voiceless, to fight the burning injustices that still scar our society.
That is why I put proper funding for mental health at the heart of our NHS long-term plan.
It is why I am ending the postcode lottery for survivors of domestic abuse. It is why the Race Disparity Audit and gender pay reporting are shining a light on inequality, so it has nowhere to hide.
And that is why I set up the independent public inquiry into the tragedy at Grenfell Tower – to search for the truth, so nothing like it can ever happen again, and so the people who lost their lives that night are never forgotten.
Because this country is a Union. Not just a family of four nations. But a union of people – all of us.
Whatever our background, the color of our skin, or who we love. We stand together. And together we have a great future.
Our politics may be under strain, but there is so much that is good about this country. So much to be proud of. So much to be optimistic about.
I will shortly leave the job that it has been the honor of my life to hold – the second female Prime Minister but certainly not the last.
I do so with no ill will, but with enormous and enduring gratitude to have had the opportunity to serve the country I love.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnn.com/europe/live-news/theresa-may-resignation-announcement-0524-gbr-intl/index.html

2019-05-24 10:02:00Z
52780302735748

Kamis, 23 Mei 2019

Chagos Islands dispute: UN backs end to UK control - BBC News

The UN has passed a resolution demanding the UK return control of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius.

In the non-binding vote in the General Assembly in New York, 116 states were in favour and only six against, a major diplomatic blow to the UK.

Fifty-six states, including France and Germany, abstained.

Mauritius says it was forced to give up the Indian Ocean group - now a British overseas territory - in 1965 in exchange for independence.

In a statement to the BBC, the UK's Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) said Britain did not recognise Mauritius' claim to sovereignty, but would stand by an earlier commitment to hand over control of the islands to Mauritius when they were no longer needed for defence purposes.

The US, Hungary, Israel, Australia and the Maldives were the states voting with the UK against the resolution.

It comes months after the UN's high court advised that the UK should leave the islands "as rapidly as possible".

UK warns of setting precedent

Analysis by Nada Tawfik, BBC News, New York

The fundamental question before the General Assembly was whether the decades-long dispute was at its heart a matter of decolonisation, or a bilateral sovereignty issue to be worked out between the UK and Mauritius alone.

The vote was decisive, with 115 countries standing with Mauritius.

Former colonies were also clear in their position. India said support for decolonisation was one of the most significant contributions that the UN had made towards the promotion of fundamental human rights.

UK ambassador to the UN Karen Pierce, along with the United States, warned that the vote would set a precedent that should be of concern to all member states with their own sovereignty disputes.

Britain purchased the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965 for £3m, creating a region known as the British Indian Ocean Territory.

Between 1967 and 1973, it evicted the islands' entire population to make way for a joint military base with the US, which is still in place on Diego Garcia.

US planes have been sent from the base to bomb Afghanistan and Iraq. The facility was also reportedly used as a "black site" by the CIA to interrogate terrorism suspects. In 2016, the lease for the base was extended until 2036.

"The joint UK-US defence facility on the British Indian Ocean Territory helps to keep people in Britain and around the world safe from terrorism, organised crime and piracy," the FCO said.

Before Wednesday's vote, Mauritian Prime Minister Pravid Kumar Jug-Nauth told the General Assembly the forcible eviction of Chagossians was akin to a crime against humanity.

However, he said Mauritius would allow the military base to continue operating "in accordance with international law", if it were given control of the islands.

Mr Jug-Nauth said this would give the facility a "higher degree of legal certainty" for the future.

The UK has maintained that Mauritius gave up the territory freely in return for a range of benefits.

Ambassador Pierce has insisted that the issue should be resolved only by the countries involved.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-48371388

2019-05-23 13:59:51Z
52780301757167

Chagos Islands dispute: UN backs end to UK control - BBC News

The UN has passed a resolution demanding the UK return control of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius.

In the non-binding vote in the General Assembly in New York, 116 states were in favour and only six against, a major diplomatic blow to the UK.

Fifty-six states, including France and Germany, abstained.

Mauritius says it was forced to give up the Indian Ocean group - now a British overseas territory - in 1965 in exchange for independence.

In a statement to the BBC, the UK's Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) said Britain did not recognise Mauritius' claim to sovereignty, but would stand by an earlier commitment to hand over control of the islands to Mauritius when they were no longer needed for defence purposes.

The US, Hungary, Israel, Australia and the Maldives were the states voting with the UK against the resolution.

It comes months after the UN's high court advised that the UK should leave the islands "as rapidly as possible".

UK warns of setting precedent

Analysis by Nada Tawfik, BBC News, New York

The fundamental question before the General Assembly was whether the decades-long dispute was at its heart a matter of decolonisation, or a bilateral sovereignty issue to be worked out between the UK and Mauritius alone.

The vote was decisive, with 115 countries standing with Mauritius.

Former colonies were also clear in their position. India said support for decolonisation was one of the most significant contributions that the UN had made towards the promotion of fundamental human rights.

UK ambassador to the UN Karen Pierce, along with the United States, warned that the vote would set a precedent that should be of concern to all member states with their own sovereignty disputes.

Britain purchased the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965 for £3m, creating a region known as the British Indian Ocean Territory.

Between 1967 and 1973, it evicted the islands' entire population to make way for a joint military base with the US, which is still in place on Diego Garcia.

US planes have been sent from the base to bomb Afghanistan and Iraq. The facility was also reportedly used as a "black site" by the CIA to interrogate terrorism suspects. In 2016, the lease for the base was extended until 2036.

"The joint UK-US defence facility on the British Indian Ocean Territory helps to keep people in Britain and around the world safe from terrorism, organised crime and piracy," the FCO said.

Before Wednesday's vote, Mauritian Prime Minister Pravid Kumar Jug-Nauth told the General Assembly the forcible eviction of Chagossians was akin to a crime against humanity.

However, he said Mauritius would allow the military base to continue operating "in accordance with international law", if it were given control of the islands.

Mr Jug-Nauth said this would give the facility a "higher degree of legal certainty" for the future.

The UK has maintained that Mauritius gave up the territory freely in return for a range of benefits.

Ambassador Pierce has insisted that the issue should be resolved only by the countries involved.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-48371388

2019-05-23 13:23:20Z
52780301757167

'Vladimir Putin' Talk Show in U.K. Prompts Sharp Intake of Breath in Russia - The New York Times

LONDON — Whether it be the suspicion that he meddled in the Brexit referendum or the accusation that he ordered the poisoning of a former spy, President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia stirs strong emotions in Britain.

Now, the BBC is hoping to mine the Russian leader’s fame — or infamy — with a comedy series presented by a digital effigy of Mr. Putin, who cackles in a trailer for the program that his next great geopolitical victory will be to host the “No. 1 chat show in the U.K.”

The satirical show, called “Tonight With Vladimir Putin,” uses a three-dimensional cartoon of Mr. Putin interviewing real guests in front of an audience, the BBC announced on Wednesday.

Whether the Kremlin will see the funny side is debatable.

“He doesn’t often get mocked and I don’t think that he’ll like it,” said Joanna Szostek, a lecturer in political communication at the University of Glasgow.

“It’s not going to help bilateral relations, obviously,” Dr. Szostek added, noting that Moscow was likely to see the show as politically motivated because it considered the BBC a propaganda arm of the British government. The tone of the show could feed the Kremlin narrative that Western criticism of Mr. Putin was driven by an anti-Russian agenda, she said.

The Putin caricature begins the trailer provocatively. “Greetings, people of the ‘United Kingdom’!” the digital puppet yells outside Buckingham Palace, miming air quotes in a less-than-subtle reference to the bruising political battles around Britain’s departure from the European Union and the fractious elections for the European Parliament which are being held this week.

In the first episode, planned to air on June 14, “Mr. Putin” — or “everybody’s favorite bear-wrestling global strongman,” as the BBC described him — will meet Alastair Campbell, the onetime spokesman for former Prime Minister Tony Blair. In the next episode, the digital host will try “to get his head around feminism” in a discussion with the comedian and podcaster Deborah Frances-White, according to the statement.

The sharp intake of breath from observers of Russian politics was almost audible after the BBC’s announcement. Comments on Twitter from Moscow-based journalists and researchers included a face-palm emoji in reaction to the puppet’s accent and a warning that the broadcaster was “playing with fire.”

In Russia, such a caricature would be unthinkable nowadays. A show in the 1990s on the Russian network NTV, called “Puppets,” featured a cartoon figure of Mr. Putin and other prominent politicians, including former President Boris Yeltsin. But the show was discontinued soon after Mr. Putin assumed the presidency in 2000 and nothing like it has been shown on television since.

Dmitri S. Peskov, the Kremlin’s spokesman, dismissed the BBC show in a conference call with journalists on Friday. “Lots of books have been written about Putin, lots of caricatures have been drawn, lots of puppets and cartoons have been created,” he said.

“Putin hasn’t read books about himself or looked at caricatures,” Mr. Peskov added. “He doesn’t want to take after them. Let these caricatures take after him.”

Russia Today, the English-language network that is widely seen as part of the Kremlin’s propaganda machine, also raised an arched eyebrow.

“The show appears to be a regurgitated dystopian nightmare,” the Russian broadcaster said on its website.

“Surprisingly, many people were able to overcome bouts of nausea and cringe-induced spasms long enough to air their disgust,” the article continued, citing negative reaction on Twitter.

A spokeswoman for the BBC said on Wednesday that the show’s creators would not be available to comment.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/23/world/europe/bbc-putin-puppet.html

2019-05-23 11:58:59Z
CAIiEFuTYnbThTKpWbgmoXd8-00qFwgEKg8IACoHCAowjuuKAzCWrzww5oEY

Chagos Islands dispute: UN backs end to UK control - BBC News

The UN has passed a resolution demanding the UK return control of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius.

In the non-binding vote in the General Assembly in New York, 116 states were in favour and only six against, a major diplomatic blow to the UK.

Fifty-six states, including France and Germany, abstained.

Mauritius says it was forced to give up the Indian Ocean group - now a British overseas territory - in 1965 in exchange for independence.

In a statement to the BBC, the UK's Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) said Britain did not recognise Mauritius' claim to sovereignty, but would stand by an earlier commitment to hand over control of the islands to Mauritius when they were no longer needed for defence purposes.

The US, Hungary, Israel, Australia and the Maldives were the states voting with the UK against the resolution.

It comes months after the UN's high court advised that the UK should leave the islands "as rapidly as possible".

UK warns of setting precedent

Analysis by Nada Tawfik, BBC News, New York

The fundamental question before the General Assembly was whether the decades-long dispute was at its heart a matter of decolonisation, or a bilateral sovereignty issue to be worked out between the UK and Mauritius alone.

The vote was decisive, with 115 countries standing with Mauritius.

Former colonies were also clear in their position. India said support for decolonisation was one of the most significant contributions that the UN had made towards the promotion of fundamental human rights.

UK ambassador to the UN Karen Pierce, along with the United States, warned that the vote would set a precedent that should be of concern to all member states with their own sovereignty disputes.

Britain purchased the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965 for £3m, creating a region known as the British Indian Ocean Territory.

Between 1967 and 1973, it evicted the islands' entire population to make way for a joint military base with the US, which is still in place on Diego Garcia.

US planes have been sent from the base to bomb Afghanistan and Iraq. The facility was also reportedly used as a "black site" by the CIA to interrogate terrorism suspects. In 2016, the lease for the base was extended until 2036.

"The joint UK-US defence facility on the British Indian Ocean Territory helps to keep people in Britain and around the world safe from terrorism, organised crime and piracy," the FCO said.

Before Wednesday's vote, Mauritian Prime Minister Pravid Kumar Jug-Nauth told the General Assembly the forcible eviction of Chagossians was akin to a crime against humanity.

However, he said Mauritius would allow the military base to continue operating "in accordance with international law", if it were given control of the islands.

Mr Jug-Nauth said this would give the facility a "higher degree of legal certainty" for the future.

The UK has maintained that Mauritius gave up the territory freely in return for a range of benefits.

Ambassador Pierce has insisted that the issue should be resolved only by the countries involved.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-48371388

2019-05-23 11:41:27Z
CBMiJGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy91ay00ODM3MTM4ONIBKGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy9hbXAvdWstNDgzNzEzODg

UK's Eurovision entry Bigger Than Us has five points deducted after contest - The Times

The UK’s terrible Eurovision experience just got worse. Michael Rice’s song, Bigger Than Us, has had its score lowered by five points after organisers found that an error had been made in calculating the totals.

The European Broadcasting Union said that Rice garnered 11 points in Saturday’s finale, not 16 as originally stated. The song finished in last place at the contest in Tel Aviv, Israel.

The error came about because an incorrect calculation was used to create a substitute score after the Belarusian jury was dismissed, the EBU said. It said that the mistake was a result of human error and that it deeply regretted the blunder.

Duncan Laurence from the Netherlands remained winner of the contest. His song, Arcade, gained six points under…

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/uks-eurovision-entry-bigger-than-us-has-five-points-deducted-after-contest-jzxcx26qd

2019-05-23 11:00:00Z
52780301757143