Selasa, 23 April 2024

Rishi Sunak pledges to hit 2.5% GDP defence spending target by 2030 - BBC

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Rishi Sunak has promised billions more for defence to counter threats from "an axis of authoritarian states".

The prime minister said UK military spending would rise to 2.5% of national income by 2030, in a move that hardens a previous spending pledge.

He stressed the UK was "not on the brink of war" but claimed the extra money would put the country's defence industry "on a war footing".

Labour is also committed to a 2.5% target when economic conditions allow.

Labour's shadow defence secretary John Healey said the party "wants to see a fully funded plan" to reach this level, but he said the Tories had "shown time and time again that they cannot be trusted on defence".

He said Labour would review resources for the armed forces within a year of taking office, if it wins the general election later this year.

Making the defence announcement during a visit to Poland, Mr Sunak said the UK was facing the most dangerous international environment since the days of the Cold War between the West and former Soviet Union.

He said the extra spending would put the UK's defence industry "on a war footing," although he stressed the UK was "not on the brink of war".

However, he argued the investment was required because authoritarian states such as Russia and China were showing a "new assertiveness" and were increasingly working together.

The prime minister said spending would rise "steadily in each and every year" before 2030. Downing Street said it would mean £75bn more for the military over the next six years.

It echoes a previous commitment made by former PM Boris Johnson, who promised in 2022 to raise spending to 2.5% of GDP by the end of the decade.

Mr Sunak confirmed earlier the UK will provide an additional £500m for Ukraine this year, on top of £2.5bn already allocated.

He added that the UK could continue to provide "at least the current level of military support to Ukraine for every year it is needed".

The prime minister also argued the 2.5% target could set a "new benchmark" for Nato, whose target for members to spend 2% of GDP on defence is now a decade old.

The UK spent 2.07% of GDP on defence last year, according to the data, but says it plans to spend 2.3% this year, including resources given to Ukraine.

In total 11 of the 31 Nato members last year hit the 2% target, according to the transatlantic alliance's estimates.

Poland was the top spender as a share of its economy, allocating 3.9% of GDP - more than twice the amount it had spent in 2022.

The US was in second place, spending 3.5%, although it is by far the biggest spender overall.

The announcement comes after increasing Tory pressure on defence following the Budget in March, with two ministers publicly urging him to increase spending last month.

Downing Street said its 2.5.% commitment was "fully-funded" - but some experts have previously expressed scepticism over long-term targets.

Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank, said the previous, vaguer promise to raise spending to 2.5% of GDP was "not worth the paper it's written on unless accompanied by some sense of how it will be afforded".

Last month, MPs on the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) warned the government currently lacked a "credible plan" to fund the MoD.

Last year the National Audit Office (NAO) said the Ministry of Defence was facing a £16.9bn black hole in its finances - despite an injection of £46.3bn over the next 10 years.

Mr Sunak refused to rule out calling a general election in July when questioned earlier by reporters, repeating his previous comment that it would be "in the second half" of the year.

Map showing defence spending by Nato members in Europe. Poland and Greece had the highest spending as a % of GDP among European members.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTY4ODgwMTcx0gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNjg4ODAxNzEuYW1w?oc=5

2024-04-23 14:27:48Z
CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTY4ODgwMTcx0gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNjg4ODAxNzEuYW1w

Five migrants die trying to cross English Channel - The Telegraph

At least five migrants, including a child, have died after their dinghy capsized in an attempt to cross the English Channel, French emergency services said on Tuesday.

Around 100 migrants packed onto several overloaded dinghies were at the centre of the alert, according to the French sea rescue service SNSM.

Panic broke out on board one of the boats and a four-year-old girl was crushed to death by the other passengers, it reported.

The small boats got into trouble after trying to cross the Channel near the town of Wimereux, north of Boulogne, according to local newspaper La Voix du Nord, with at least one said to have capsized. 

The French coast guard told Reuters that police were operating at a beach, adding that there were several bodies. 

The reported deaths came hours after Parliament finally passed into law Rishi Sunak’s Safety of Rwanda Bill, paving the way for the first deportation flights aimed at deterring the crossings.

All available boats in the area were immediately dispatched to help rescue the migrants and the SNSM speedboat the Président Jacques Lebrun brought in the injured.

Rescue operations are continuing, with major resources deployed and associations helping the migrants.

Although the weather was calm, conditions remained difficult, with an air temperature of zero degrees Celsius early on Tuesday morning and a water temperature of no more than 10C.

French maritime authorities for the Channel and the North Sea told The Telegraph: “We are aware of an operation under way and unconscious people have been brought to shore but we are missing sufficient information to provide more details for now.”

Several dozen boats carrying migrants are reported to have left beaches around Calais at 3am as people smugglers exploited the favourable weather conditions and relative calm of the sea.

Emergency services, police and coastguards from Boulogne, Calais and Dunkirk were sent to the scene. Aircraft operated by the EU border force Frontex were seen flying over the area, while several reconnaissance drones were sent offshore to monitor the boats still afloat.

During the night, French police officers had intercepted two boats, two fuel cans, two engines and life jackets before they could be used to put migrants to sea.

Emergency services gather
Emergency services gather

James Cleverly, the Home Secretary, said: “These tragedies have to stop. I will not accept a status quo which costs so many lives. 

“This Government is doing everything we can to end this trade, stop the boats and ultimately break the business model of the evil people smuggling gangs, so they no longer put lives at risk.”

People believed to be migrants at the Port of Dover
People believed to be migrants at the Port of Dover on Tuesday as crossing continue Credit: REUTERS/Toby Melville

Enver Solomon, chief executive of the Refugee Council, said: “This is another devastating human tragedy that could and should have been avoided – and for it to happen just hours after the Government’s Rwanda Bill became law makes it all the more tragic.

“The only sustainable way to reduce dangerous journeys across the world’s busiest shipping lane is for the Government to reduce the need for desperate people to take desperate actions.

“Instead of hostile, headline-grabbing legislation, we need to see safe routes for those fleeing conflict and persecution, including more options for family reunion, refugee visas, and cooperation with our European neighbours. We don’t need costly and unworkable laws – we need a fair and humane process that upholds the right to asylum, ensuring refugees are treated with dignity and respect.”

On Monday, Home Office figures showed the number of migrants arriving by small boats across the Channel had increased by 24 per cent to 6,265 in the first four months of this year, compared with 5,049 in the same period in 2023.

The latest incident comes six weeks after a seven-year-old girl drowned in the Aa canal at Watten, which flows into the North Sea, while in a small boat with 15 other migrants.

At the end of February, a 22-year-old Turkish man died when he fell from his boat off the coast of Calais. An Eritrean was indicted and detained on Saturday in connection with this case.

On the night of Jan 13, five migrants, including a 14-year-old Syrian teenager, died at Wimereux as they tried to reach a boat already at sea in 9C water.

Twelve migrants lost their lives in 2023 trying to cross the English Channel, according to the Préfecture maritime de la Manche et de la Mer du Nord.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiU2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRlbGVncmFwaC5jby51ay9uZXdzLzIwMjQvMDQvMjMvbWlncmFudHMtZm91bmQtZGVhZC1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLWNoYW5uZWwv0gEA?oc=5

2024-04-23 10:31:00Z
CBMiU2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRlbGVncmFwaC5jby51ay9uZXdzLzIwMjQvMDQvMjMvbWlncmFudHMtZm91bmQtZGVhZC1pbi1lbmdsaXNoLWNoYW5uZWwv0gEA

Rwanda Bill: How did my MP vote on Sunak's asylum legislation? - The Independent

Rishi Sunak’s Rwanda bill will become law after a night of parliamentary ping-pong between the Commons and Lords.

MPs and Lords were at loggerheads on Monday night over an amendments made by peers to the prime minister’s controversial Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Bill. Peers finally caved with Lord Anderson of Ipswich saying: “The time has now come to acknowledge the primacy of the elected house”.

Downing Street had warned it would not make concessions over the amendments, which saw peers demand that an independent monitoring committee must declare Rwanda safe before asylum-seekers can be sent there. Peers caved on a separate amendment that called for Afghans who served with British forces to be exempt from deportations.

It came after Mr Sunak claimed that flights to Rwanda had been booked and would take off by July, “no ifs, no buts”, despite his struggles in passing the necessary legislation into law and a host of remaining practical barriers in physically implementing the policies.

Mr Sunak told a surprise No 10 press conference on Monday that the first flight carrying asylum seekers would leave for Rwanda in 10-12 weeks, hours before the Bill appeared before parliamentarians once again.

Peers had repeatedly blocked the legislation with a series of amendments, stretching debate on the “emergency legislation” over more than four months and delaying flights taking asylum seekers to Rwanda.

You can use the tool below to find out how your MP voted on the legislation:

If your MP is listed as voting ‘aye’ they have voted for the Rwanda bill, and if they are listed as ‘no’ they will have voted against it.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiX2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmluZGVwZW5kZW50LmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWsvcG9saXRpY3MvcndhbmRhLWJpbGwtcGFzc2VkLWhvdy1kaWQtbXAtdm90ZS1iMjUzMjk5Ni5odG1s0gEA?oc=5

2024-04-23 09:37:35Z
CBMiX2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmluZGVwZW5kZW50LmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWsvcG9saXRpY3MvcndhbmRhLWJpbGwtcGFzc2VkLWhvdy1kaWQtbXAtdm90ZS1iMjUzMjk5Ni5odG1s0gEA

Met chief defends 'professional' officer who threatened to arrest Jewish campaigner - Evening Standard

“And yes, I do have confidence in him, but that’s on the basis that he works to rebuild the confidence and trust of not just the Jewish community, but the wider public, particularly people in London... by making it clear that the police are not tolerating behaviour that we would all collectively deem unacceptable when we see it, because it undermines our values,” he added.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMieGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnN0YW5kYXJkLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvbG9uZG9uL21ldC1wb2xpY2UtbWFyay1yb3dsZXktYW50aXNlbWl0aXNtLWdpZGVvbi1mYWx0ZXItcGFsZXN0aW5lLXByb3Rlc3QtYjExNTMxNjguaHRtbNIBAA?oc=5

2024-04-23 10:17:52Z
CBMieGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnN0YW5kYXJkLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvbG9uZG9uL21ldC1wb2xpY2UtbWFyay1yb3dsZXktYW50aXNlbWl0aXNtLWdpZGVvbi1mYWx0ZXItcGFsZXN0aW5lLXByb3Rlc3QtYjExNTMxNjguaHRtbNIBAA

Senin, 22 April 2024

Initial story about ‘openly Jewish’ incident not full picture, says ex-senior Met officer - The Guardian

An initial account of an exchange between a police officer and an antisemitism campaigner that sparked heavy criticism of Scotland Yard did not show the full picture, a former senior officer has said.

Footage released by the Campaign Against Antisemitism (CAA) last Friday showed its chief executive, Gideon Falter, being told by a police officer that his “openly Jewish” appearance risked antagonising pro-Palestinian marchers. This precipitated claims Falter was prevented from going about his business simply because he was a Jewish man in the vicinity of a pro-Palestinian demonstration.

But a longer version of the same exchange has since emerged on Sky News, showing the officer explaining that his concern was that he had seen Falter acting in a way that led him to believe he was trying to provoke a confrontation with marchers.

That fuller account showed “a totally different encounter to the one that Mr Falter has reported”, said the former Scotland Yard chief superintendent Dal Babu on Monday.

His comments came as the prime minister, Rishi Sunak, said he retained confidence in the Metropolitan police commissioner, Sir Mark Rowley, but the latter needed to rebuild “confidence and trust” with the Jewish community.

While Babu said the “openly Jewish” comment was “not acceptable”, he told BBC Breakfast that the longer clip showed Falter “attempting to go against the march, trying to push past the officers, and I think for 13 minutes the officers showed great restraint”.

Babu added: “They offered to take him to a crossing point, they offered to help him and the group he was with the opportunity to cross at a more appropriate place. So the narrative that’s been pushed for the past few days is not accurate.

“Personally, if I was policing that march, I would have been inclined to have arrested [Falter] for assault on a police officer and breach of the peace.”

In the shorter CAA version of the footage, Falter could be seen on the fringes of the march in central London earlier this month, wearing a kippah and trying to pass police officers so he could cross the demonstration’s path to get to the other side of the street.

An officer blocked his way, telling him: “You are quite openly Jewish, this is a pro-Palestinian march, I’m not accusing you of anything but I’m worried about the reaction to your presence.” Falter was also offered a police escort away and told that if he chose to stay put, he would be arrested for a “breach of peace” because his presence was antagonising in the context of the march.

The longer version shows the officer explaining to Falter that his approach was informed by the knowledge he had already deliberately walked out into the middle of the march and was therefore “looking to try and antagonise this”.

Addressing Babu’s comments, Falter said: “A former chief superintendent has even outrageously suggested that I assaulted a police officer and should have been arrested. This has now gone far beyond victim-blaming. These tactics are desperate, but they reveal the Met’s priorities.”

Falter has vowed to continue attending marches, telling ITV’s Good Morning Britain: “It’s not, for me, about these frontline officers. It’s about the decisions that have been made for six months now by Sir Mark Rowley, who has failed abjectly to stand up for Jewish Londoners and … he’s curtailed our rights and our ability to walk around the street, in favour of letting these huge groups of protesters do what they want to do.”

Ahead of the next march on Saturday, Falter said: “After this all happened, I felt it’s actually very important that Jews feel that they can walk the streets.”

Rowley has been summoned to a meeting with the home secretary, James Cleverly, and the mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, on Monday afternoon. The home secretary will press Rowley on whether the force is using all its powers under the Public Order Act – such as the power to impose conditions on the marches. The Met has insisted it has been using the law as vigorously as the legislation allows.

The Community Security Trust (CST), which monitors anti-Jewish abuse and attacks and provides security for UK Jewish communities, said: “We see the extra support the police have given to our community, we know why it is needed and we know that it is usually done with the professionalism that everyone expects, without it making the headlines.

“Despite all the good work, there have also been mistakes which set everything backwards and stick in the public mind as further showing how bad things are right now. This latest case fits that profile, with the context and detail lost in the heat of controversy. An individual officer tried to do the right thing but ended up making things worse in a very difficult moment.”

The Met commissioner will also meet leaders of Jewish groups on Monday.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMihgFodHRwczovL3d3dy50aGVndWFyZGlhbi5jb20vdWstbmV3cy8yMDI0L2Fwci8yMi9pbml0aWFsLXN0b3J5LWFib3V0LW9wZW5seS1qZXdpc2gtaW5jaWRlbnQtbm90LWZ1bGwtcGljdHVyZS1zYXlzLWV4LXNlbmlvci1tZXQtb2ZmaWNlctIBhgFodHRwczovL2FtcC50aGVndWFyZGlhbi5jb20vdWstbmV3cy8yMDI0L2Fwci8yMi9pbml0aWFsLXN0b3J5LWFib3V0LW9wZW5seS1qZXdpc2gtaW5jaWRlbnQtbm90LWZ1bGwtcGljdHVyZS1zYXlzLWV4LXNlbmlvci1tZXQtb2ZmaWNlcg?oc=5

2024-04-22 13:21:00Z
CBMihgFodHRwczovL3d3dy50aGVndWFyZGlhbi5jb20vdWstbmV3cy8yMDI0L2Fwci8yMi9pbml0aWFsLXN0b3J5LWFib3V0LW9wZW5seS1qZXdpc2gtaW5jaWRlbnQtbm90LWZ1bGwtcGljdHVyZS1zYXlzLWV4LXNlbmlvci1tZXQtb2ZmaWNlctIBhgFodHRwczovL2FtcC50aGVndWFyZGlhbi5jb20vdWstbmV3cy8yMDI0L2Fwci8yMi9pbml0aWFsLXN0b3J5LWFib3V0LW9wZW5seS1qZXdpc2gtaW5jaWRlbnQtbm90LWZ1bGwtcGljdHVyZS1zYXlzLWV4LXNlbmlvci1tZXQtb2ZmaWNlcg

'I was Jewish and crossing the street': Campaigner criticises 'outrageous' reaction to antisemitism row - Sky News

The campaigner at the centre of an antisemitism row with the Metropolitan Police has criticised "outrageous" comments made by a former senior officer who said he would have considered arresting him for assault.

Gideon Falter, the chief executive of the Campaign Against Antisemitism, spoke to Sky News's Kay Burley at Breakfast after footage showed a police officer preventing him from crossing a road near a pro-Palestinian march in London because he was "openly Jewish".

The officer also told Mr Falter, who was wearing a kippah skull cap near the march on Saturday 13 April, that he was "worried about the reaction to your presence".

Mr Falter has called on Met Police chief Sir Mark Rowley to resign and accused the force of "victim-blaming" after the encounter.

Sky News understands Sir Mark will meet the home secretary today.

He also met a delegation from the Jewish community to discuss their concerns alongside other senior officers.

Following the meeting, the Community Security Trust said the Met representatives repeated their apologies and agreed to "consult more closely" with the Jewish community, including senior Jewish police officers, "to ensure greater cultural sensitivity in future communications".

The statement said the groups would continue their dialogue with the police regarding the "cumulative impact of the repeated anti-Israel protests".

"We urge the police and government to work together to find ways to limit this impact through reducing the number of protests, moving them to less disruptive locations and acting firmly and consistently whenever offences are committed by people on the demonstrations," they added.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak has said he has confidence in Sir Mark but that he needs to rebuild "confidence and trust" with the Jewish community.

Retired senior officer defends Met's response

Meanwhile, former Met Chief Superintendent Dal Babu said he has seen the full 13-minute video of the incident on Sky News and saw a "different encounter" to the one Mr Falter had described.

Mr Babu said that if he had been policing the march he would have considered arresting the campaigner for "assault on a police officer and a breach of the peace".

Mr Falter said in response: "I think it's a pretty outrageous thing to say, I think it's a pretty outrageous thing to be giving any credence to.

"I was Jewish. I was crossing the street".

Mr Falter added: "I did not assault a police officer. How on Earth can anybody say that? I'm quite clearly in the video trying to continue to walk where I was going."

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

New video of 'openly Jewish' row

Mr Babu later reaffirmed his view of the encounter and said the video shows Mr Falter pushing policing officers "out of the way" which amounts to "common assault".

He also defended the police's handling of the situation and said: "I think the police dealt with it and tried to be as sensitive as possible.

"I think the police officer was offering to take Mr Falter and his group to a place where they could cross more appropriately. Mr Falter was refusing to move and wanted to cross at that particular place against the march."

Campaigner will walk near march again

The force apologised on Friday for using the term "openly Jewish", but then had to apologise for their apology after suggesting opponents of pro-Palestinian marches "must know that their presence is provocative".

The Met said in its initial apology that its aim was to keep people safe.

Mr Falter has said he is planning to go for a walk in the vicinity of a pro-Palestinian march again on Saturday 27 April, adding that he "should be allowed to do that".

Earlier on the show, black journalist Seyi Rhodes said that although he wouldn't want to, he would avoid a far-right march if he knew one was being held in a certain place in London.

Mr Falter said in response: "It is outrageous to put to me that the correct response of Jewish people to these marches, where we have seen such brazen antisemitism the whole time is to just stay away from them."

Read more from Sky News:
Baby saved from womb of mother killed in Israeli strike
Iran minister downplays attack
Trail of destruction in Lebanon's 'ghost towns'

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

'Time for Mark Rowley to go'

Falter insists he was not there to 'counter-protest'

Ben Jamal, director of the Palestinian Solidarity Campaign, has said Mr Falter is wrong to have suggested he was "innocently going for a walk".

"The reality was he came to the march with an entourage of four to five people and a film crew and sought to break through the stewards.

"He physically pushes himself past the police in order to walk in front of the march... he was trying to provoke a confrontation. That's what happened."

Mr Jamal accused the Campaign Against Antisemitism of "using the tactic of coming to the marches to provoke an incident so that they can say there are scenes of disorder and therefore the marches cannot go ahead".

Mr Falter said he found Mr Jamal's remarks to be "absolutely astonishing".

He added: "I was not going to try and provoke something... what exactly does he think I'm trying to provoke by being 'openly Jewish'?

"I was not there to counter-protest. I was not there with film crews or anything of the sort. I was simply Jewish in the vicinity of these marches."

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMihgFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9pLXdhcy1qZXdpc2gtYW5kLWNyb3NzaW5nLXRoZS1zdHJlZXQtY2FtcGFpZ25lci1jcml0aWNpc2VzLW91dHJhZ2VvdXMtcmVhY3Rpb24tdG8tYW50aXNlbWl0aXNtLXJvdy0xMzEyMDc3NtIBigFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9hbXAvaS13YXMtamV3aXNoLWFuZC1jcm9zc2luZy10aGUtc3RyZWV0LWNhbXBhaWduZXItY3JpdGljaXNlcy1vdXRyYWdlb3VzLXJlYWN0aW9uLXRvLWFudGlzZW1pdGlzbS1yb3ctMTMxMjA3NzY?oc=5

2024-04-22 12:30:02Z
CBMihgFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9pLXdhcy1qZXdpc2gtYW5kLWNyb3NzaW5nLXRoZS1zdHJlZXQtY2FtcGFpZ25lci1jcml0aWNpc2VzLW91dHJhZ2VvdXMtcmVhY3Rpb24tdG8tYW50aXNlbWl0aXNtLXJvdy0xMzEyMDc3NtIBigFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9hbXAvaS13YXMtamV3aXNoLWFuZC1jcm9zc2luZy10aGUtc3RyZWV0LWNhbXBhaWduZXItY3JpdGljaXNlcy1vdXRyYWdlb3VzLXJlYWN0aW9uLXRvLWFudGlzZW1pdGlzbS1yb3ctMTMxMjA3NzY

Minister suggests borderline racism to blame for Lords blocking Rwanda bill – UK politics live - The Guardian

Filters BETA

As Adam Bienkov from Byline Times points out, Andrew Mitchell, the deputy foreign secretary who robustly defended the Rwanda deportation policy on the Today programme this morning (see 8.55am) is the same Andrew Mitchell who, when he was a backbencher two years ago, wrote an article for ConservativeHome saying the plan was “impractical, likely to be ineffective and, above all, extremely expensive”.

Sky News has broadcast a clip of Rishi Sunak addressing a meeting of the government’s illegal migration operations committee in the cabinet room at No 10 this morning. It is almost certainly a preview of what he will say at the press conference, which is due to start within the next hour.

And Sunak is making a big claim, arguing that the Rwanda bill marks a “fundamental change” in global policy on illegal migration.

Sunak said:

After months of back and forth, it is now time for the house to pass our Rwanda legislation. No more prevarication, no more delay.

And, in doing this, parliament will put beyond all doubt that Rwanda is a safe country …

I believe that this is landmark legislation. It doesn’t just represent a step-change in how we do this, but actually a fundamental change on the global equation on how to tackle illegal migration.

And, so voting this bill through parliament today, we collectively can send a very clear message that if you come here illegally, you won’t be able to stay.

There may be an element of truth in Sunak’s claim about the significance of the bill, although it does cut across the government’s insistence that it is only following a policy already championed by Australia, and it will only be seen to be landmark legislation if it works. Many people, like Suella Braverman (see 9.52am), assume it won’t.

Suellla Braverman, the former Conservative home secretary, restated her belief this morning that the government’s Rwanda bill won’t work. Braverman, who was sacked by Rishi Sunak partly because they disagreed over immigration policy, told the Today progamme:

Unfortunately I voted against the legislation because I think it’s fatally flawed. I don’t think it’s going to stop the boats, and that’s the test of its efficacy.

Braverman said all the government’s attempts to tackle illegal migration were being thwarted by human rights law.

The simple fact is this is our third Act of Parliament that the Government has introduced in four years to stop the boats.

None of them have worked – none of them have worked because they are all still susceptible to the international human rights law framework contained in the European convention on human rights judged by, and adjudicated by, the European court of human rights in Strasbourg – that’s the problem, and that’s why I’ve been calling for a few years now to leave the European convention on human rights.

At the Conservative party conference in October 2022 Braverman famously said that it was her “dream” to see the first flight take off to Rwanda because she thought the policy would have a deterrent effect. She said:

I would love to have a front page of The Telegraph with a plane taking off to Rwanda, that’s my dream, it’s my obsession.

But this morning she revealed that she has revised hew view since then. When the Today presenter Mishal Husain reminded her of her “dream” comment, and asked if she would congratulate the PM when the first flight took off, Braverman replied:

The prime minister has pledged to stop the boats. That’s what we owe the British people and that’s the test. I’m afraid this bill, as drafted, will not achieve that goal. It's fatally flawed …

One flight here or there, with a few passengers on it, will not provide the deterrent effect that is necessary to break the people smuggling gangs, to send the message to the illegal migrants that it’s not worth getting on a dinghy in the first place because you’re not going to get a life in the UK.

We need to have regular flights going to Rwanda with large numbers of passengers on them. That’s the only way to stop the boats.

In his Today interview Andrew Mitchell, the deputy foreign secretary, also claimed that Rwanda was “arguably safer than London”.

He said the country had made remarkable progress over the past 30 years. He explained:

Rwanda … has come back from the abyss, a country completely destroyed by the genocide.

It is absolutely extraordinary what the Rwandan government have achieved in all walks of life.

It is a safe country and indeed, if you look at the statistics, Kigali is arguably safer than London. So I have no doubt at all about the safety of Rwanda and the efficacy of this scheme.

When it was put to him that the Rwandan police opened fire on refugees in the country who were protesting in 2018, Mitchell said this “remarkable regime” had managed to look after “extraordinary numbers of refugees”.

He said the 2018 shooting was a “contested incident”.

And he said the UN refugee agency, UNHCR, placed refugees in Rwanda.

If the UNHCR thinks it’s right and proper and safe to do that, then I think we should be perfectly confident that the British government, in reaching the same conclusion, is also correct.

Mitchell has had a close involvement with Rwanda for years. In 2007, as shadow international development secretary, he launched a volunteering project in the country for Conservative activists, Project Umubano, which helped to change the party’s stance on development issues.

In his Today programme interview Andrew Mitchell, the deputy foreign secretary, suggested that Rishi Sunak would use his press conference later to say how many people the government expects to sent to Rwanda later this year.

Mitchell said he was confident that the policy would have a deterrent effect on the number of people crossing the Channel in small boats. Asked ‘what kinds of numbers” the government was envisaging, Mitchell replied:

You’ll have to wait for the prime minister to set that out in the press conference later today.

Mitchell also implied Rishi Sunak would reveal what aircraft will be used to send people to Rwanda. Originally ministers were hoping to hire an aircraft from a commercial airline, but reportedly RAF planes may be used instead because private companies do not want to get involved.

Mitchell said it was for Sunak to set out “the robust operational arrangments which we have made to implement the will of the House of Commons”.

Good morning. Rishi Sunak has decided that that the safety of Rwanda (asylum and immigration) bill must complete its passage through parliament tonight and he is holding a press conference later this morning partly so that he can publicly warn the peers who are holding up the bill that it is time to back down. But, as Pippa Crerar reports, peers are still holding out for concessions, particularly on that which would exempt Afghanistan interpreters and others who have worked for British forces abroad from the threat of deportation to Rwanda.

MPs and peers have told that they could be in for a long night. Both sides accept that the Lords will eventually let the Commons have its way, but peers are entitled to ask MPs to “think again” and, for political reasons, they will want to show that they have fought hard to get their way. That’s why it looks as though it might be a late night; if peers aren’t still up after midnight, people won’t be convinced that they were really trying.

Andrew Mitchell, the deputy foreign secretary, told the Today programme this morning that the government is not minded to compromise. Speaking about the Lords amendment that would exempt Afghan interpreters from deportation to Rwanda, he said this was not necessary because the government already has other schemes in place to enable those Afghans to come to the UK. He told the programme:

After the Afghan was was over, we set up a safe and legal route for those Afghans who had served the British Army, served Britain, the Arap (Afghan Relocations and Assistance Policy) scheme, and 16,000 Afghans have been settled in Britain as a result. For that reason, we simply don’t think this amendment is necessarily … We’re not in the business of cluttering up the statute book with unnecessary legislation.

And Mitchell was even more critical of the Lords on the second issue on which they are digging in their heels – the Lord Hope amendment that would ensure that Rwanda is not treated as a safe country for refugees until the monitoring committee set up by the government confirms it is safe. Mitchell said that peers were being too harsh about the Rwandan judiciary and that some of what had been said was borderline racist. He told the programme:

I’ve listened to what has been said about the independence of the judiciary [in Rwanda], the judicial arrangements that have been set up on Rwanda. The Rwandan judge, Judge Rugege, is an enormously distinguished and respected international jurist. Indeed, he is an honorary fellow in law at an Oxford College.

Some of the discussions that have gone on in the Lord’s about the judicial arrangements within Rwanda have been patronising and, in my view, border on racism.

So we don’t think it’s necessary to have that amendment either, and that the necessary structures are in place to ensure that the scheme works properly and fairly.

Morning: Rishi Sunak holds a press conference in Downing Street.

Morning: Keir Starmer is on a visit in the West Midlands, where he is chairing a shadow cabinet meeting.

2.30pm: Michael Gove, the levelling up secretary, takes questions in the Commons.

After 3.30pm: MPs debate the latest Lords amendments to the safety of Rwanda (asylum and immigration) bill.

Early evening: Peers debate the Rwanda bill again. If, as expected, they insist on their amendments, “ping pong” will continue and the bill will return to the Commons for another vote by MPs. The process could continue into the early hours.

Also, David Cameron, the foreign secretary, is on a visit to Tajikistan.

If you want to contact me, do use the “send us a message” feature. You’ll see it just below the byline – on the left of the screen, if you are reading on a laptop or a desktop. This is for people who want to message me directly. I find it very useful when people message to point out errors (even typos – no mistake is too small to correct). Often I find your questions very interesting, too. I can’t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either in the comments below the line; privately (if you leave an email address and that seems more appropriate); or in the main blog, if I think it is a topic of wide interest.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMidWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRoZWd1YXJkaWFuLmNvbS9wb2xpdGljcy9saXZlLzIwMjQvYXByLzIyL2NvbnNlcnZhdGl2ZXMtbGFib3VyLXN1bmFrLXJ3YW5kYS1iaWxsLWFmZ2hhbnMtdWstcG9saXRpY3MtbGl2ZdIBdWh0dHBzOi8vYW1wLnRoZWd1YXJkaWFuLmNvbS9wb2xpdGljcy9saXZlLzIwMjQvYXByLzIyL2NvbnNlcnZhdGl2ZXMtbGFib3VyLXN1bmFrLXJ3YW5kYS1iaWxsLWFmZ2hhbnMtdWstcG9saXRpY3MtbGl2ZQ?oc=5

2024-04-22 07:55:00Z
CBMidWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRoZWd1YXJkaWFuLmNvbS9wb2xpdGljcy9saXZlLzIwMjQvYXByLzIyL2NvbnNlcnZhdGl2ZXMtbGFib3VyLXN1bmFrLXJ3YW5kYS1iaWxsLWFmZ2hhbnMtdWstcG9saXRpY3MtbGl2ZdIBdWh0dHBzOi8vYW1wLnRoZWd1YXJkaWFuLmNvbS9wb2xpdGljcy9saXZlLzIwMjQvYXByLzIyL2NvbnNlcnZhdGl2ZXMtbGFib3VyLXN1bmFrLXJ3YW5kYS1iaWxsLWFmZ2hhbnMtdWstcG9saXRpY3MtbGl2ZQ