Jumat, 12 April 2024

Alan Bates vows to raise funds to prosecute Post Office bosses if inquiry fails - The Telegraph

Alan Bates said he will fundraise to put Post Office bosses behind bars if sub-postmasters are “failed” by the inquiry into the Horizon scandal.

The former sub-postmaster led colleagues to a High Court victory against the organisation in 2019.

Mr Bates said he was “certain” he would be able to raise the money to pursue private prosecutions if necessary.

“In so many other scandals, the people who make decisions and ruin numerous lives walk away scot-free. We are not prepared to do that,” he told The Times.

“We, as a group, will bring private prosecutions if the authorities fail us once again. If we try to raise that money, I am absolutely certain that we will raise that money.”

The Post Office inquiry is examining the scandal that saw more than 900 other sub-postmasters wrongfully prosecuted as a result of fictional shortfalls produced by faulty Horizon software.

Former Post Office workers celebrate outside the Royal Courts of Justice after their convictions were overturned by the Court of Appeal
Former Post Office workers celebrate outside the Royal Courts of Justice after their convictions were overturned by the Court of Appeal Credit: Alamy

On Friday, the inquiry heard that Paula Vennells, the former Post Office chief executive, “likely” signed off a trial bill of more than £300,000 after a sub-postmaster was blamed for a £25,000 shortfall at his branch.

Lee Castleton, 55, who was played by actor Will Mellor in the ITV drama Mr Bates vs. The Post Office, was forced to declare bankruptcy in 2007 after the Post Office pursued him through the civil courts.

Alan Cook, the former Post Office managing director, told the public inquiry how Ms Vennells “likely” signed off the legal budget. The former chief executive joined the Post Office as its network director and would have been in this role at the time.

Questioning Mr Cook on the £300,000 spent, inquiry chair Sir Wyn Williams said: “What I want to ask you is, what was the process back in 2006 for authorising the expenditure of those sums of money in the Post Office?”

As part of his response, Mr Cook said: “We had delegated authorities in place that would allow people below me, that would have probably lied with Paula Vennells as the network director, would have been able to sign that off.”

Clarifying, Sir Wyn then asked: “So what it amounts to is there would have been a person within the Post Office organisation who would have authority to sign off spending the money without talking either to you or to the board?”

“Correct,” responded Mr Cook.

The inquiry chairman continued: “So did you tell me the most likely person was Paula Vennells?”

Mr Cook replied: “Yes, I think so.”

At another point during his evidence, Mr Cook, who held the managing director role from 2006 to the early part of 2010, was also shown an email in which he blamed shortfalls on sub-postmasters with their “hand in the till”.

tmg.video.placeholder.alt HSsDzGtvgVU

In an email sent in October 2009 to Mary Fagan, former corporate affairs director of Royal Mail, Mr Cook said: “My instincts tell me that, in a recession, subbies with their hand in the till choose to blame the technology when they are found to be short of cash.”

The pair were discussing increasing press interest about concerns surrounding the accuracy of Horizon.

Asked why it was his instinct to think that sub-postmasters were stealing, Mr Cook told the inquiry: “Well, that was an expression I will regret for the rest of my life.

“It is an inappropriate thing to put in an email, not in line with my view of sub-postmasters.”

Mr Cook’s evidence was followed by that of Adam Crozier, the ex-Royal Mail Group (RMG) chief executive who is now chairman of BT Group.

Mr Crozier left RMG in 2010 after seven years as its chief executive, a time in which it was the Post Office’s parent company before it was privatised.

Both Mr Crozier and Mr Cook offered apologies to postmasters and their families affected by the scandal.

However, they also both appeared to claim they did not initially know the organisations they presided over brought prosecutions against sub-postmasters.

Mr Cook, who said he only came to realise this in 2009 after he saw an article about Horizon victims in Computer Weekly, described his lack of knowledge on the subject as a “regret”, saying he had “never come across a situation before that a trading entity could initiate criminal prosecutions themselves”.

tmg.video.placeholder.alt dPSQY7bOXZ4

Questioning Mr Crozier, Jason Beer KC, lead counsel to the inquiry, asked: “Were you not aware that in fact there was no Post Office legal team – it had no separate legal in-house function and that civil and criminal proceedings were brought by lawyers within the Royal Mail Group legal team?”

Mr Crozier said: “I was not, no.”

Mr Beer continued: “So lawyers from within the group gave advice on prosecutions, they made decisions about prosecutions and within prosecutions, and they conducted the proceedings, not any Post Office lawyers, you didn’t know that?”

Mr Crozier replied: “I was not aware of that, no.”

The former ITV chief executive, who did not appear in the channel’s drama about the Horizon scandal, was also asked how he would feel about Mr Cook not knowing that the Post Office was initiating its own prosecutions against sub-postmasters.

“I would find that surprising,” Mr Crozier said in response.

Lawyers for Ms Vennells previously released a statement on her behalf that said: “I continue to support and focus on co-operating with the inquiry and expect to be giving evidence in the coming months.

“I am truly sorry for the devastation caused to the sub-postmasters and their families, whose lives were torn apart by being wrongly accused and wrongly prosecuted as a result of the Horizon system.

“I now intend to continue to focus on assisting the inquiry and will not make any further public comment until it has concluded.”

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiaGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRlbGVncmFwaC5jby51ay9uZXdzLzIwMjQvMDQvMTIvYWxhbi1iYXRlcy1yYWlzZS1mdW5kcy1wcm9zZWN1dGUtcG9zdC1vZmZpY2UtYm9zc2VzLWlucXVpcnkv0gEA?oc=5

2024-04-12 20:06:00Z
CBMiaGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRlbGVncmFwaC5jby51ay9uZXdzLzIwMjQvMDQvMTIvYWxhbi1iYXRlcy1yYWlzZS1mdW5kcy1wcm9zZWN1dGUtcG9zdC1vZmZpY2UtYm9zc2VzLWlucXVpcnkv0gEA

Post Office scandal: Ex-boss accused subpostmasters in email of having 'their hand in the till' - Sky News

A Post Office boss blamed cash shortfalls caused by computer glitches on branch managers "with their hand in the till".

An email written by Alan Cook, who was managing director of the group from 2006 to 2010, has been read out to the public inquiry into the Horizon IT scandal.

Giving evidence on Friday, he said it was an expression he would "regret for the rest of my life".

Mr Cook was at the helm when about 200 prosecutions were brought against subpostmasters.

Despite being in charge, he said he was "unaware" it was the Post Office that had brought criminal proceedings against individuals - and that during his time in the top job, it did not feel like the Post Office "had a crisis on its hands".

Alan Cook arrives to give evidence to the Post Office Horizon IT inquiry.
Pic: Reuters
Image: Alan Cook arrives to give evidence to the Post Office inquiry. Pic: Reuters

An email sent by Mr Cook in October 2009 to a Royal Mail Group press officer said: "For some strange reason there is a steadily building nervousness about the accuracy of the Horizon system and the press are on it now as well.

"It is... strange in that the system has been stable and reliable for many years now and there is absolutely no logical reason why these fears should now develop.

More on Post Office Scandal

"My instincts tell me that, in a recession, subbies (subpostmasters) with their hand in the till choose to blame the technology when they are found to be short of cash."

Pressed over his remarks at the inquiry, Mr Cook said: "Well that's an expression I will regret for the rest of my life. It was an inappropriate thing to put in an email - not in line with my view of subpostmasters."

Hundreds of people were wrongly convicted of stealing after bugs and errors in the Horizon accounting system made it appear as though money was missing at their branches.

Victims faced prison and financial ruin, others were ostracised by their communities, while some took their own lives.

Fresh attention was brought to the scandal after ITV broadcast the drama Mr Bates Vs The Post Office, prompting government action.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Alan Bates speaks at Post Office inquiry

Earlier, as he began giving evidence, Mr Cook said he wanted to "put on record most strongly my personal apology and sympathies with all subpostmasters their families and those affected by this".

He also told the inquiry: "I was unaware that the Post Office were the prosecuting authority.

"I knew there were court cases but didn't realise that the Post Office in about two-thirds of the cases had initiated the prosecution as opposed to the DPP (director of public prosecutions) or the police."

During his time as non-executive director of the Post Office, Mr Cook said it was his "regret" he failed to properly understand minutes of a meeting which said the organisation had a "principle of undertaking prosecutions".

He said: "It never occurred to me reading that that the Post Office was the sole arbiter of whether or not that criminal prosecution would proceed."

Mr Cook added: "I had never come across a situation before that a trading entity could initiate criminal prosecutions themselves.

"I'm not blaming others for this, it's my misunderstanding but I've just not encountered that type of situation."

He acknowledged he should have known the Post Office was making prosecutorial decisions.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Jailed subpostmistress watches evidence

Counsel to the inquiry Sam Stevens asked: "Your evidence is still that in no point in the years that you were the managing director, (nobody) in the security or investigations team raised the fact that they made decisions to prosecute?"

Responding, Mr Cook said: "That is my position, definitely."

He went on: "I never asked that question - well I did obviously when we got to the Computer Weekly article (in 2009) which we'll get to but prior to that point I had gone through not picking up that.

"I'm not blaming them for not spelling it out enough, to be frank I'm blaming me for not picking up on it."

During his time at the Post Office, Mr Cook said in his witness statement it was not apparent there was a problem with the Horizon system, pointing out that financial audits "did not identify a systemic issue".

He added: "It is a matter of deep regret to me that I did not recognise that the early issues raised in 2009 were an indication of a systemic issue before I left POL (Post Office Limited) in February 2010.

"In addition, I have since learned that the annual rate of prosecutions brought by POL in the seven years prior to my appointment (ie since 1999) had remained steady during that time, and continued to remain steady during my time in office and thereafter. It did not feel, at the time, that POL had a crisis on its hands."

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMifmh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L3Bvc3Qtb2ZmaWNlLXNjYW5kYWwtZXgtYm9zcy1tYWtlcy1wZXJzb25hbC1hcG9sb2d5LW1vc3Qtc3Ryb25nbHktdG8td3JvbmdlZC1zdWJwb3N0bWFzdGVycy0xMzExMzM4OdIBggFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9hbXAvcG9zdC1vZmZpY2Utc2NhbmRhbC1leC1ib3NzLW1ha2VzLXBlcnNvbmFsLWFwb2xvZ3ktbW9zdC1zdHJvbmdseS10by13cm9uZ2VkLXN1YnBvc3RtYXN0ZXJzLTEzMTEzMzg5?oc=5

2024-04-12 11:15:00Z
CBMifmh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L3Bvc3Qtb2ZmaWNlLXNjYW5kYWwtZXgtYm9zcy1tYWtlcy1wZXJzb25hbC1hcG9sb2d5LW1vc3Qtc3Ryb25nbHktdG8td3JvbmdlZC1zdWJwb3N0bWFzdGVycy0xMzExMzM4OdIBggFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9hbXAvcG9zdC1vZmZpY2Utc2NhbmRhbC1leC1ib3NzLW1ha2VzLXBlcnNvbmFsLWFwb2xvZ3ktbW9zdC1zdHJvbmdseS10by13cm9uZ2VkLXN1YnBvc3RtYXN0ZXJzLTEzMTEzMzg5

Keir Starmer: Labour commitment to nuclear weapons unshakeable - BBC

Sir Keir Starmer and Labour's shadow defence secretary John Healey meet workers at BAE Systems in Barrow-in-Furness, CumbriaPA Media

Sir Keir Starmer has said his commitment to the UK's nuclear weapons is "unshakeable" and "absolute".

Writing in the Daily Mail, he described the creation of the NHS and an independent British nuclear programme as "towering achievements" of the Labour government elected in 1945.

The Labour leader has also said he wants to raise defence spending to 2.5% of GDP "as soon as resources allow".

The government plans to spend 2.3% of GDP on defence this year.

Chancellor Jeremy Hunt has also said he wants the figure to rise to 2.5% "as soon as economic conditions allow," but neither party has set out a timeline for this to happen.

Earlier this year, two ministers - Anne-Marie Trevelyan and Tom Tugendhat - publicly urged the government to invest in defence at a "much greater pace".

Defence Secretary Grant Shapps said Labour could not "be trusted with our nation's defences" because Sir Keir had "tried twice to put Jeremy Corbyn in charge of the nation's armed forces".

"The same man who wanted to scrap our nuclear deterrent, dismantle Nato and questioned the integrity of British intelligence community," he added.

Neither Sir Keir's pledge on the UK's Trident nuclear weapons nor his aspiration to increase defence spending were "credible", Mr Shapps claimed, as 11 members of the Labour leader's team - including deputy leader Angela Rayner and shadow foreign secretary David Lammy - had voted against renewing Trident in 2016.

He accused Sir Keir of "saying whatever he needs to, to get your vote".

Since the United States dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945, Labour has often been divided on nuclear weapons - and the related issue of multilateral versus unilateral disarmament - not least during the leadership of Sir Keir's predecessor, Jeremy Corbyn.

Clement Attlee, who was prime minister from 1945-1951, is now widely revered in the party as the father of the NHS and much of the rest of the welfare state.

But he was also the father of Britain's nuclear bomb, making sure the UK got its own "nuclear deterrent", committing many millions to its development at a time when the country was technically bankrupt.

His foreign secretary, Ernest Bevin, was a key figure in the establishment of the Nato alliance.

In his Mail article, Sir Keir emphasised these points, calling them a "proud part of my party's heritage".

In an interview with In an interview with the i newspaper, he said he would conduct a strategic review of defence and security "to be clear what the priorities are".

In a statement ahead of a visit to Barrow-in-Furness in Cumbria - where nuclear submarines are made - Sir Keir said Labour's commitment to the UK having nuclear weapons was "total".

The UK's four nuclear-armed Vanguard submarines that carry Trident missiles are housed in the west of Scotland.

"In the face of rising global threats and growing Russian aggression, the UK's nuclear deterrent is the bedrock of Labour's plan to keep Britain safe," said Sir Keir.

File photo dated 29/09/17 of the Vanguard-class nuclear deterrent submarine HMS Vengeance at HM Naval Base Clyde, Faslane.
PA Media

"It will ensure vital protection for the UK and our Nato allies in the years ahead, as well as supporting thousands of high-paying jobs across the UK."

He also described his party as one that had "changed" - referring to Mr Corbyn, a long-time opponent of the UK's Trident submarine-based missile system and vice-president of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND).

Speaking to the i, Sir Keir said nuclear weapons were "expensive but it's absolutely vital and needed".

Annual running costs are estimated at 6% of the defence budget - about £3bn for 2023-24. The new Dreadnought boats being built at Barrow-in-Furness to replace the current submarines in the early 2030s carry an estimated cost of £31bn.

Asked about defence spending, Sir Keir told the paper: "Obviously we want to get to 2.5% as soon as resources allow that to happen.

"That was the position when Labour left government and we absolutely stand by our commitment to Nato."

Left-wing group, Momentum, which backed Mr Corbyn, condemned Sir Keir's priorities.

'Meaningless'

Co-chair Hilary Schan said: "For months we have been told by the Labour leadership that there's simply no money left: no money to scrap the two-child benefit cap, no money to introduce universal free school meals, no money to invest in our public services or the green transition.

"Yet at a stroke Keir Starmer has today made a massive, permanent spending commitment. This shows that Labour can and should make different economic choices."

Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey attacked both Labour and the Conservatives for offering "only meaningless talk about vague aspirations for some unspecified time in the future".

"With Putin waging war in Europe and Trump threatening the future of NATO", his party would reverse "the Conservatives' irresponsible cuts to Army troop numbers", he said.

SNP defence spokesperson Martin Docherty-Hughes MP - whose party does not support Trident - said Westminster had "already wasted billions of pounds of taxpayers' money on nuclear weapons".

He added it was "grotesque that Sir Keir Starmer is prepared to throw billions more down the drain when his party claim there is no money to improve our NHS, help families with the cost of living or to properly invest in our green energy future".

All members of military alliance Nato have pledged to spend at least 2% of the value of their economies - measured by GDP - on defence per year by 2024.

According to the Nato secretary general's annual report in March, Poland was the top spender, allocating 3.9% of its GDP (the total value of goods and services produced), which was more than twice the amount it had spent in 2022.

The US was in second place at 3.2%.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTY4NzkwNDM10gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNjg3OTA0MzUuYW1w?oc=5

2024-04-12 11:29:15Z
CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTY4NzkwNDM10gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNjg3OTA0MzUuYW1w

Keir Starmer: Labour commitment to nuclear weapons unshakeable - BBC

Labour leader Keir Starmer gestures as he delivers a speech at Silverstone Technology Park on December 12, 2023 in Milton Keynes, England. The Labour leader speaks on the fourth anniversary of the General Election saying that he has changed the Labour Party so that it 'shares Britain's values'.Getty Images

Sir Keir Starmer has said his commitment to the UK's nuclear weapons is "unshakeable" and "absolute".

Writing in the Daily Mail, he described the creation of an independent British nuclear programme and the NHS as "towering achievements" of the post-1945 Labour government.

The Labour leader has also said he wants to raise defence spending to 2.5% of GDP "as soon as resources allow".

According to NATO estimates, it stood at 2.1% of GDP in 2023.

Chancellor Jeremy Hunt has also said he wants defence spending to rise to 2.5%.

Earlier this year, two ministers - Anne-Marie Trevelyan and Tom Tugendhat - publicly urged the government to invest in defence at a "much greater pace".

In his spring Budget, Mr Hunt said the UK's armed forces were the "best funded in Europe" and that spending would rise to 2.5% "as soon as economic conditions allow".

Sir Keir told the i newspaper he would conduct a strategic review of defence and security "to be clear what the priorities are".

In a statement ahead of a visit to Barrow-in-Furness in Cumbria on Friday - where nuclear submarines are made - Sir Keir said Labour's commitment to the UK having nuclear weapons was "total".

The UK's four nuclear-armed Vanguard submarines that carry Trident missiles are housed in the west of Scotland.

"In the face of rising global threats and growing Russian aggression, the UK's nuclear deterrent is the bedrock of Labour's plan to keep Britain safe," said Sir Keir.

"It will ensure vital protection for the UK and our Nato allies in the years ahead, as well as supporting thousands of high-paying jobs across the UK."

He also described his party as one that has "changed" - referring to his predecessor Jeremy Corbyn, a long-time opponent of the UK's Trident submarine-based missile system and vice-president of the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND).

Speaking to the i, Sir Keir said nuclear weapons were "expensive but it's absolutely vital and needed".

Annual running costs are estimated at 6% of the defence budget - about £3bn for 2023-24. The new Dreadnought boats being built at Barrow-in-Furness to replace the current submarines in the early 2030s carry an estimated cost of £31bn.

File photo dated 29/09/17 of the Vanguard-class nuclear deterrent submarine HMS Vengeance at HM Naval Base Clyde, Faslane.
PA Media

Asked about defence spending, Sir Keir told the paper: "Obviously we want to get to 2.5% as soon as resources allow that to happen.

"That was the position when Labour left government and we absolutely stand by our commitment to Nato."

Defence Secretary Grant Shapps said the Labour leader and shadow defence secretary had "tried twice to put Jeremy Corbyn in charge of the nation's armed forces".

"The same man who wanted to scrap our nuclear deterrent, dismantle Nato and questioned the integrity of British intelligence community," Mr Shapps said.

"They are not the party to be trusted with our nation's defences."

SNP defence spokesperson Martin Docherty-Hughes MP - whose party does not support Trident - said Westminster had "already wasted billions of pounds of taxpayers' money on nuclear weapons".

He added it was "grotesque that Sir Keir Starmer is prepared to throw billions more down the drain when his party claim there is no money to improve our NHS, help families with the cost of living or to properly invest in our green energy future".

All members of military alliance Nato have pledged to spend at least 2% of the value of their economies - measured by GDP - on defence per year by 2024.

Nato estimates for 2023 suggest that Poland was the top spender, allocating 3.9% of GDP (the total value of goods produced and services), which was more than twice the amount it had spent in 2022.

The US was in second place at 3.5%, about the same level as it has been spending for the last decade.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTY4NzkwNDM10gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNjg3OTA0MzUuYW1w?oc=5

2024-04-12 08:03:29Z
CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTY4NzkwNDM10gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNjg3OTA0MzUuYW1w

Life on chaotic school run road where 'things get nasty' at drop-off time - Birmingham Live

A Kings Heath resident has said scenes of ‘absolute gridlock’ outside her home are an ‘everyday experience’ as she called for more traffic-calming measures in her neighbourhood. Ruth Follows lives near Goldsmith Road in Kings Heath , which is used by parents as a drop-off point for nearby St Dunstan's Catholic Primary School and Bishop Challoner Catholic College.

Ruth has told how drivers were causing mayhem on her road, leading to ‘nasty’ scenes. In a video she posted on social media, cars and vans at a standstill can be seen lining the road on the first day back from the Easter break.

Ruth is one of a number of residents in the area calling for car-free streets in the residential area, saying ‘it’s time to give a LTN a go.’ Another parent who also lives nearby, Claire Spencer, said she feared a child would be ‘seriously hurt’ unless action was taken.

READ MORE: It's Birmingham's best place to live - but bus chiefs can't spell it

In the video posted to social media, Ruth Follows filmed the scenes outside her home on Tuesday (9 April) . She said: “The scenes in the video are nothing new, it is a regular occurrence.

“You have a lot of cars going down narrow, residential streets which aren’t built to cope with it - it was absolute total gridlock for around 45 minutes. It can get quite nasty at times, you get a lot of road rage and a lot of swearing.”

Cars line the street at school drop-off time in Kings Heath.
Cars line the street at school drop-off time in Kings Heath.

It’s not the first time parents in Kings Heath have raised concerns about traffic around schools, with a 1,000-strong petition presented to the council last year calling for car-free streets outside another primary. Ruth said a LTN would be a good step to addressing the issue.

She said: “Kings Heath is a fantastic area to live in, we have everything we need on our doorstep and it’s a brilliant community - but my children see so many angry drivers and hear a lot of swearing which I don’t particularly like. I don’t want them to think that this is an acceptable way to behave.

“The lack of forward momentum on finding a potential solution is a bit frustrating. As residents, we’d love to work with local schools to help find a solution to this problem - and they are definitely trying to help. But, for me, I think it’s time to give a LTN a go.

“At school drop-off time, we have people travelling in from across the city - an LTN would stop them coming directly through our residential roads. The majority of residents here want to give a LTN a go.”

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiWWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJpcm1pbmdoYW1tYWlsLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvbWlkbGFuZHMtbmV3cy9saWZlLWNoYW90aWMtc2Nob29sLXJ1bi1yb2FkLTI4OTc1ODE50gFdaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmlybWluZ2hhbW1haWwuY28udWsvbmV3cy9taWRsYW5kcy1uZXdzL2xpZmUtY2hhb3RpYy1zY2hvb2wtcnVuLXJvYWQtMjg5NzU4MTkuYW1w?oc=5

2024-04-12 04:37:00Z
CBMiWWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJpcm1pbmdoYW1tYWlsLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvbWlkbGFuZHMtbmV3cy9saWZlLWNoYW90aWMtc2Nob29sLXJ1bi1yb2FkLTI4OTc1ODE50gFdaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmlybWluZ2hhbW1haWwuY28udWsvbmV3cy9taWRsYW5kcy1uZXdzL2xpZmUtY2hhb3RpYy1zY2hvb2wtcnVuLXJvYWQtMjg5NzU4MTkuYW1w

Kamis, 11 April 2024

Ban on children’s puberty blockers to be enforced in private sector in England - The Guardian

England’s health regulator will take enforcement action against private clinics that prescribe puberty blockers to under-18s in defiance of the NHS’s ban on the controversial drugs.

The Care Quality Commission (CQC) will check that private providers of care to those who are questioning their gender identity are applying new guidance recommended by Dr Hilary Cass.

In an important report this week Cass warned that puberty blockers have not been proven to reduce gender dysphoria or improve body satisfaction, may damage a teenager’s ability to think and reason and also that the rationale for suppressing puberty at all “remains unclear”.

The ex-president of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health made clear her view, which NHS England had already adopted last month, that they should no longer be given to anyone under 18 on safety grounds.

The CQC plans to ensure that Cass’s approach is being followed by private clinics, not just the NHS, amid concern from doctors and campaigners that for-profit outfits may seek to keep prescribing the drugs and create a “two-tier” approach to the drugs, with access dependent on wealth.

There is a risk that “a very dangerous loophole” will allow private clinics to cash in on the demand from gender-questioning young people to get access to puberty blockers, one doctor who backs Cass’s plan for sweeping changes in transgender healthcare said.

In future, to prevent that from happening, the regulator will check if licensed healthcare providers are “taking into account the recommendations of the Cass Review” when it registers and inspects them. Any private clinic found to be issuing puberty blockers to anyone under 18 could be disciplined by the CQC if a prescription was found to be a breach of their legal duty to provide “safe care and treatment”, based on the evidence Cass analysed in her three-and-a-half-year-long inquiry.

“If a private organisation registered with the CQC fails to meet the condition of its registration, then the regulator can take enforcement action,” a Whitehall source said.

The CQC has an array of regulatory powers at its disposal including, as a last resort, withdrawing the registration which grants legal permission for a provider to operate.

Victoria Atkins, the health and social care secretary, made clear on Thursday that private providers would not be allowed to avoid adhering to the new treatment approach Cass proposed.

Writing in the Daily Telegraph, she said: “I am clear in my expectation that private providers must fall in line too [with the NHS’s new approach to puberty blockers].”

But some doubt remains as to whether guidelines devised for the NHS can be made mandatory for private clinics too. “The CQC will expect all private providers to take into account the Cass recommendations. But they don’t have to. Private providers aren’t bound by Cass’s recommendations,” a source explained.

However, at present no CQC-registered private gender care clinic issues puberty blockers.

A CQC spokesperson said: “Best-practice guidance for gender identity clinics will be considered by internal specialist advisers during registration and regulatory assessments.”

One clinic, Gender Plus, run by the clinical psychologist Dr Aidan Kelly, offers cross-sex – masculinising or feminising – hormones to 16- to 18-year-olds but does not provide puberty blockers. Doctors should exercise “extreme caution” before issuing cross-sex, or “affirming”, hormones to under-18s, Cass said in her report.

Sue Evans, a psychotherapist and mental health nurse who used to work at the Tavistock and Portman NHS mental health trust, which hosted the controversial gender identity development service (Gids) for gender-confused children and young people, is challenging the legality of the CQC’s decision in January to recognise Gender Plus’s hormone clinic as a provider of health care.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMifWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRoZWd1YXJkaWFuLmNvbS9zb2NpZXR5LzIwMjQvYXByLzExL2Jhbi1vbi1jaGlsZHJlbnMtcHViZXJ0eS1ibG9ja2Vycy10by1iZS1lbmZvcmNlZC1pbi1wcml2YXRlLXNlY3Rvci1pbi1lbmdsYW5k0gF9aHR0cHM6Ly9hbXAudGhlZ3VhcmRpYW4uY29tL3NvY2lldHkvMjAyNC9hcHIvMTEvYmFuLW9uLWNoaWxkcmVucy1wdWJlcnR5LWJsb2NrZXJzLXRvLWJlLWVuZm9yY2VkLWluLXByaXZhdGUtc2VjdG9yLWluLWVuZ2xhbmQ?oc=5

2024-04-12 01:30:00Z
CBMifWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRoZWd1YXJkaWFuLmNvbS9zb2NpZXR5LzIwMjQvYXByLzExL2Jhbi1vbi1jaGlsZHJlbnMtcHViZXJ0eS1ibG9ja2Vycy10by1iZS1lbmZvcmNlZC1pbi1wcml2YXRlLXNlY3Rvci1pbi1lbmdsYW5k0gF9aHR0cHM6Ly9hbXAudGhlZ3VhcmRpYW4uY29tL3NvY2lldHkvMjAyNC9hcHIvMTEvYmFuLW9uLWNoaWxkcmVucy1wdWJlcnR5LWJsb2NrZXJzLXRvLWJlLWVuZm9yY2VkLWluLXByaXZhdGUtc2VjdG9yLWluLWVuZ2xhbmQ

British military laser could be used to target Russian drones in Ukraine - Sky News

A new British military laser could be used in Ukraine to shoot down Russian drones, the defence secretary has suggested.

The DragonFire weapon, which is expected to be ready for deployment by 2027 at the latest, could have "huge ramifications" for Kyiv's conflict against Russia, Grant Shapps said.

New reforms aimed at speeding up procurement mean the laser, which was originally set to be rolled out in 2032, will now be operational five years earlier than planned, according to the Ministry of Defence.

Russia-Ukraine war latest: Moscow accuses British special forces of operating in Ukraine

A target drone showing damaged caused by 'DragonFire' a British military laser weapon system
Image: A target drone and mortar casing showing the damage done by DragonFire. Pics: PA
A mortar casing showing damage done by 'DragonFire'

But Mr Shapps said he would look to see if the pace can be increased further "in order for Ukrainians perhaps to get their hands on it".

"I've come down to speed up the production of the DragonFire laser system because I think given that there's two big conflicts on, one sea-based, one in Europe, this could have huge ramifications to have a weapon capable particularly of taking down drones," Mr Shapps said at the Porton Down military research hub in Salisbury.

"And so what I want to do is speed up what would usually be a very lengthy development procurement process, possibly up to 10 years, based on my conversations this morning, to a much shorter timeframe to get it deployed, potentially on ships, incoming drones, and potentially on land.

"Again, incoming drones, but it doesn't take much imagination to see how that could be helpful in Ukraine for example."

Laser-directed energy weapons (LDEWs) use an intense beam of light to cut through their target.

The MoD hopes the DragonFire system will offer a low-cost alternative to missiles in shooting down attack drones and even mortars.

It has been developed by defence firms MBDA, Leonardy and QinetiQ and the Defence Science and Technology Laboratory.

Read more:
The smuggler charging thousands to dodge Ukraine's army draft

Drone attack hits Russian-held nuclear power plant in Ukraine

The 'DragonFire' laser weapon system, which could be rushed on to the frontline in Ukraine to take down Russian drones.
Pic: PA
Image: The DragonFire laser weapon system and a metal plate showing the damage it can do. Pics: PA
A metal plate showing damaged caused by 'DragonFire', a British military laser weapon system

The new procurement model, coming into effect next week, is aimed at speeding up the process of getting cutting-edge military developments out onto the field.

"It's designed to not wait until we have this at 99.9% perfection before it goes into the field, but get it to sort of 70% and then get it out there and then... develop it from there," Mr Shapps said.

Mr Shapps added: "In a more dangerous world, our approach to procurement is shifting with it. We need to be more urgent, more critical and more global."

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMibGh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2JyaXRpc2gtbWlsaXRhcnktbGFzZXItY291bGQtYmUtdXNlZC10by10YXJnZXQtcnVzc2lhbi1kcm9uZXMtaW4tdWtyYWluZS0xMzExMzIzMdIBcGh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2FtcC9icml0aXNoLW1pbGl0YXJ5LWxhc2VyLWNvdWxkLWJlLXVzZWQtdG8tdGFyZ2V0LXJ1c3NpYW4tZHJvbmVzLWluLXVrcmFpbmUtMTMxMTMyMzE?oc=5

2024-04-11 23:56:55Z
CBMibGh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2JyaXRpc2gtbWlsaXRhcnktbGFzZXItY291bGQtYmUtdXNlZC10by10YXJnZXQtcnVzc2lhbi1kcm9uZXMtaW4tdWtyYWluZS0xMzExMzIzMdIBcGh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2FtcC9icml0aXNoLW1pbGl0YXJ5LWxhc2VyLWNvdWxkLWJlLXVzZWQtdG8tdGFyZ2V0LXJ1c3NpYW4tZHJvbmVzLWluLXVrcmFpbmUtMTMxMTMyMzE