Kamis, 14 Maret 2024

Frank Hester: Rishi Sunak say he won't return money from donor accused of racism - BBC.com

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

  1. Frank Hester: Rishi Sunak say he won't return money from donor accused of racism  BBC.com
  2. Newspaper headlines: Donor row intensifies and new extremism definition  BBC
  3. Gove declines to say whether Hester could be considered an ‘extremist’ – UK politics live  The Guardian
  4. Diane Abbott slams Speaker for not calling her to talk on race row despite standing up over 40 times  Sky News
  5. Diane Abbott accuses Tories AND Labour of 'shocking' racism in donor row  The Independent

https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiLWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy91ay1wb2xpdGljcy02ODU1NDQ3NtIBMWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy91ay1wb2xpdGljcy02ODU1NDQ3Ni5hbXA?oc=5

2024-03-14 05:13:25Z
CBMiLWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy91ay1wb2xpdGljcy02ODU1NDQ3NtIBMWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy91ay1wb2xpdGljcy02ODU1NDQ3Ni5hbXA

New extremism definition unveiled by government - BBC

Secretary of State for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, Michael Gove, speaks outside BBC Broadcasting House in London,PA Media

Ministers have unveiled a new extremism definition under which certain groups will be blocked from government funding and meeting officials.

It will apply to, but not criminalise, groups that promote an ideology based on "violence, hatred or intolerance".

Communities Secretary Michael Gove said a surge in extremism since the Israel-Gaza war posed "a real risk" to the UK.

Civil liberties advocates, community groups and MPs have criticised recent government rhetoric on extremism.

The government's independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, Jonathan Hall, has warned the new policy "could undermine the UK's reputation because it would not be seen as democratic".

It is not known which groups the government proposes to label as extremist, though it has promised to publish a list in the coming weeks and suggested Islamists and neo-Nazis will be targeted.

Zara Mohammed, the head of the Muslim Council of Britain, told BBC Newsnight the definition would lead to the "unfair targeting of Muslim communities".

The government has already curtailed its engagement with the MCB, Britain's largest Muslim group, and restricted its contacts with various departments.

Earlier this month, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak stood outside Downing Street and said there were "forces here at home trying to tear us apart".

Discussing pro-Palestinian protests that have taken place since the Hamas attacks in Israel, he said: "On too many occasions recently, our streets have been hijacked by small groups who are hostile to our values and have no respect for our democratic traditions."

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Under the new definition, which comes into force on Thursday, extremism is "the promotion or advancement of an ideology based on violence, hatred or intolerance, that aims to:

  1. negate or destroy the fundamental rights and freedoms of others; or
  2. undermine, overturn or replace the UK's system of liberal parliamentary democracy and democratic rights; or
  3. intentionally create a permissive environment for others to achieve the results in (1) or (2)."

The previous definition, introduced in 2011 under the Prevent strategy, described extremism as "vocal or active opposition to fundamental British values, including democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty and mutual respect and tolerance of different faiths and belief".

The government says the new one is "narrower and more precise" and will help "clearly articulate" how extremism is "evidenced" in behaviours.

It also says there will be a "high bar" to being classed as extremist and the policy will not target those with "private, peaceful beliefs".

Organisations or individuals added to the list will not be criminalised, unlike terrorist groups. Instead, they will be barred from contact with government and will not be able to receive government funding.

Alongside the redefinition, a new unit - the Counter-Extremism Centre of Excellence - has been set up, to gather intelligence and identify extremist groups.

Groups and individuals labelled extremist have the right to seek reassessment and submit new evidence to a review.

If they still disagree, they can challenge the government's decision through a potentially costly judicial review.

Announcing the change, Mr Gove said "our values of inclusivity and tolerance are under challenge from extremists".

"In order to protect our democratic values, it is important both to reinforce what we have in common and to be clear and precise in identifying the dangers posed by extremism."

'Tinkering' not enough

Critics have warned a new definition could worsen community tensions and expose ministers to legal challenges if left too broad.

Mr Hall told the BBC: "Every attempt to update the definition of extremism has failed because it's never clear what you're trying to prevent by defining extremism."

"What we see… is a move away from people who are doing bad things, towards people who think bad things or have a bad ideology."

Azhar Qayum, the chief executive of Muslim Engagement and Development (Mend), said "delegitimising lawful dissent in this way is itself undermining liberal democratic principles" and that he had "placed the government on legal notice".

Mend describes itself as an anti-Islamophobia group. Early this year it criticised the government's decision to ban Hizb ut-Tahrir as a terrorist organisation, calling it an "anti-democratic" move.

Labour's deputy leader Angela Rayner, who also serves as shadow communities secretary, said extremism was a "serious problem that needs serious action" and that "tinkering with a new definition is not enough".

"The government's counter-extremism strategy is now nine years out of date, and they've repeatedly failed to define Islamophobia," she said.

In an open letter published in the Guardian on Sunday, former home secretaries Priti Patel, Sajid Javid and Amber Rudd urged the Conservatives and Labour to "work together to build a shared understanding of extremism and a strategy to prevent it that can stand the test of time, no matter which party wins an election".

"In the run-up to a general election, it's particularly important that that consensus is maintained and that no political party uses the issue to seek short-term tactical advantage," they said.

Brendan Cox, husband of murdered MP Jo Cox and founder of Survivors Against Terror, who also signed the letter, said the new definition was "not the scorched earth policy that we feared a few weeks ago".

He added there were "some constructive elements" to it but that the government's approach had been "mismanaged and mishandled".

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTY4NTU2OTE00gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNjg1NTY5MTQuYW1w?oc=5

2024-03-14 08:13:44Z
CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTY4NTU2OTE00gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNjg1NTY5MTQuYW1w

700 investigations launched after calls to Met Police anti-corruption service as national hotline goes live - Sky News

The Metropolitan Police have launched more than 700 investigations after nearly 3,000 contacts were made to an anti-corruption hotline in its first 18 months of operation.

The figures for the country's largest force were revealed on Thursday as the police anti-corruption and abuse reporting service was rolled out nationally.

A litany of scandals, including the murder of Sarah Everard by Wayne Couzens, and David Carrick being revealed to be a serial rapist, led the Met to be the first force to begin using the service in November 2022.

The service consists of a website and hotline to enable the public to report police behaviour that concerns them.

It will now be available for reports about forces across the UK, either online or by calling 0800 085 0000, and will be run by Crimestoppers, the independent charity which will allow anonymous tip-offs.

Potential crimes such as officers, staff or volunteers who may be taking bribes, abusing their positions and mistreating their partners can be reported.

Instances of suspected racism, homophobia, misogyny or discrimination against people who are disabled, may also be highlighted.

More on David Carrick

The details will be passed on to the relevant force and may lead to an investigation.

Since November 2022, the service has received 1,988 calls and 890 online reports regarding the Met, with 867 pieces of intelligence passed onto the force.

This has led to 728 investigations, and the remaining 139 reports were passed to other relevant police forces.

Wayne Couzens
Image: Wayne Couzens

With both Couzens and Carrick, multiple chances were missed to spot and stop their behaviour, which has depleted the public's confidence the police can root out wrongdoing in their ranks.

Last month, an independent review found a series of red flags were missed about debt-ridden, serial sex-offender Couzens.

Read more:
How Sarah Everard's killer was caught
Timeline: Wayne Couzen's behaviour and crimes

'Shameful' report exposes wider issues

A number of other scandals also damaged the Met's reputation, including two officers being jailed for sharing pictures of the bodies of two murdered sisters, and deeply offensive and disturbing messages shared among officers in WhatsApp groups.

Last year, Met Police commissioner Mark Rowley said two to three criminal cases against officers would be expected to go to court every week for several months.

Chief Constable Gavin Stephens, chairman of the National Police Chiefs' Council (NPCC), said: "This reporting service will enable us to take action by giving the public a new, anonymous and confidential route to report corruption, criminality, or abusive behaviour within policing."

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMijwFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS83MDAtaW52ZXN0aWdhdGlvbnMtbGF1bmNoZWQtYWZ0ZXItY2FsbHMtdG8tbWV0LXBvbGljZS1hbnRpLWNvcnJ1cHRpb24tc2VydmljZS1hcy1uYXRpb25hbC1ob3RsaW5lLWdvZXMtbGl2ZS0xMzA5NDI3MNIBkwFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9hbXAvNzAwLWludmVzdGlnYXRpb25zLWxhdW5jaGVkLWFmdGVyLWNhbGxzLXRvLW1ldC1wb2xpY2UtYW50aS1jb3JydXB0aW9uLXNlcnZpY2UtYXMtbmF0aW9uYWwtaG90bGluZS1nb2VzLWxpdmUtMTMwOTQyNzA?oc=5

2024-03-14 02:12:54Z
CBMijwFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS83MDAtaW52ZXN0aWdhdGlvbnMtbGF1bmNoZWQtYWZ0ZXItY2FsbHMtdG8tbWV0LXBvbGljZS1hbnRpLWNvcnJ1cHRpb24tc2VydmljZS1hcy1uYXRpb25hbC1ob3RsaW5lLWdvZXMtbGl2ZS0xMzA5NDI3MNIBkwFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9hbXAvNzAwLWludmVzdGlnYXRpb25zLWxhdW5jaGVkLWFmdGVyLWNhbGxzLXRvLW1ldC1wb2xpY2UtYW50aS1jb3JydXB0aW9uLXNlcnZpY2UtYXMtbmF0aW9uYWwtaG90bGluZS1nb2VzLWxpdmUtMTMwOTQyNzA

Rabu, 13 Maret 2024

Diane Abbott: MP criticises Speaker for race row debate snub - BBC

Diane AbbottHouse of Commons

Diane Abbott has accused the Commons Speaker of failing democracy by not allowing her to speak during a debate focused on remarks about her.

Alleged comments by a Tory donor that Ms Abbott made him "want to hate all black women" dominated Wednesday's half-hour Prime Minister's Questions.

The MP repeatedly tried to ask the prime minister a question but was not selected.

A spokesperson for the Speaker said he "ran out of time" to call Ms Abbott.

Rishi Sunak repeatedly rejected calls from MPs to pay back £10m in Tory donations from Frank Hester, who reportedly said Ms Abbott made him "want to hate all black women" and "should be shot".

The PM said Mr Hester's alleged comments were "wrong" and "racist" - but the businessman had apologised and his "remorse should be accepted".

Ms Abbott was sitting on the opposition benches during the weekly question session, but did not get a chance despite standing up, in an attempt to catch the Speaker's eye, an estimated 37 times.

In a social media post afterwards, Ms Abbott said Sir Lindsay Hoyle had failed both the Commons and "democracy".

"I don't know whose interests the Speaker thinks he is serving," she added.

MPs enter a ballot to ask a question at PMQs, which is seen as a highlight of the parliamentary week. But the Speaker also has discretion to choose additional MPs, who can rise - or bob - to signal they wish to pose the PM a question.

A spokesperson for the Speaker said: "During Prime Minister's Questions, the Speaker must select MPs from either side of the House on an alternating basis for fairness.

"This takes place within a limited time frame, with the Chair prioritising members who are already listed on the order paper. This week - as is often the case - there was not enough time to call all members who wanted to ask a question."

Ms Abbott later set out her views in an article published in the Independent, calling Mr Hester's comments "outrageously racist and sexist".

She accused the Conservative Party of regularly "whipping up racism in this country, including directed at me personally" - including posters singling Ms Abbott out as a risk during the 2017 general election.

Ms Abbott also accused Labour of failing to condemn Mr Hester's alleged comments early enough, as well as neglecting to address internal racism and sexism.

'Really poor'

Before the debate, Ms Abbott said Mr Hester's alleged comment that she needed "to be shot" was "frightening".

Both Labour Leader Sir Keir Starmer and Stephen Flynn, the SNP Westminster leader, raised Mr Hester's alleged comments with the prime minister.

Once the debate was finished, Ms Abbott could be seen shaking her head after failing to be called to speak.

Labour MP Charlotte Nichols called the Speaker's decision "really poor".

In a social media post, Ms Nichols said: "If Diane wanted to speak, rather than being spoken for and about, she should have been given the opportunity to."

During the debate, Stella Creasy - another Labour MP - posted on social media that there would be "something very wrong if [Ms Abbott's] voice isn't heard today".

A Labour party spokesman echoed these comments saying after the debate "it would have been good for the House to have been able to hear from" Ms Abbott.

As PMQs finished Sir Keir and Mr Flynn approached Ms Abbott at the back of the chamber, alongside a succession of Labour backbenchers.

During the conversation, Ms Abbott reportedly repeatedly asked Sir Keir to restore her party whip.

He is reported to have responded: "I understand."

Ms Abbott - who sits as an independent MP after being suspended by Labour - has previously called for "public support from Keir Starmer" in the wake of Mr Hester's comments.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTY4NTU2OTEx0gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNjg1NTY5MTEuYW1w?oc=5

2024-03-13 18:46:27Z
CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTY4NTU2OTEx0gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNjg1NTY5MTEuYW1w

Tory donor's alleged comments about Diane Abbott were racist, says Downing Street - BBC.com

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

  1. Tory donor's alleged comments about Diane Abbott were racist, says Downing Street  BBC.com
  2. Tory donor not 'racist' despite alleged Diane Abbott remarks, claims minister  Sky News
  3. ‘No room for the Indians?’: Tory donor Frank Hester suggested staff climb on train roof  The Guardian
  4. Kemi Badenoch refuses to toe the line – again  The Spectator
  5. Returning Frank Hester's money 'not right thing to do' says MP amid Diane Abbott row  The Independent

https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiLWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy91ay1wb2xpdGljcy02ODU0ODM4OdIBMWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy91ay1wb2xpdGljcy02ODU0ODM4OS5hbXA?oc=5

2024-03-13 07:07:30Z
CBMiLWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy91ay1wb2xpdGljcy02ODU0ODM4OdIBMWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy91ay1wb2xpdGljcy02ODU0ODM4OS5hbXA

Sir Keir Starmer promises Dame Esther Rantzen a vote on assisted dying if he wins election - Sky News

Sir Keir Starmer has promised Dame Esther Rantzen that he will allow a vote on assisted dying in the next parliament if he wins the next election.

The Labour leader made the pledge following recent interventions by the broadcaster, who recently revealed she had joined the Dignitas assisted dying clinic in Switzerland.

ITV News filmed a phone call between the pair, in which the Labour leader told the campaigner and TV presenter that a Labour government would allow MPs time to debate and vote on a change in the law, which has been brought into the spotlight in recent weeks.

Sir Keir told Dame Esther he was "personally in favour of changing the law" - something he revealed at the end of last year.

"I think we need to make time," he told her. "We will make the commitment. Esther, I can give you that commitment right now."

Assisted suicide is banned in England, Wales and Northern Ireland and carries a maximum prison sentence of 14 years.

In Scotland, although it is not a specific criminal offence, assisting the death of someone can leave a person open to murder or other charges.

More on Assisted Dying

Politics latest: Rishi Sunak says alleged comments by Tory donor were 'racist and wrong'

A bill to make assisted dying legal in Scotland will come before Holyrood in the coming weeks.

Asked whether he would like a vote within five years of the general election, Sir Keir told ITV: "Oh yes, definitely.

"I think Esther would agree with this. For people who are going through this or are likely to go through it in the next few months or years, this matters hugely and delay just prolongs the agony."

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Assisted dying laws a 'mess'

It comes after Dame Esther, who founded Childline and fronted the magazine show That's Life! for many years, told Sky News last month she was "disappointed" that a report on assisted dying did not call for a debate in parliament.

The 83-year-old, who has stage four lung cancer, is campaigning for people who have physical illnesses, and a life expectancy of six months or less, to have the right to choose when they die.

MPs on the Health and Social Care Committee concluded that in countries where assisted suicide is legal, there hadn't been a drop in the quality of palliative care.

It also identified a "pressing need" for improved mental health support for terminally ill people and said there should be a "national strategy for death literacy and support following a terminal diagnosis".

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Should govt pass assisted dying bill?

It did not recommend that MPs have a vote on the issue and warned that the government must consider what to do if the law is changed in part of the UK or in the Isle of Man or Jersey.

Sir Keir supported a change in the law the last time the issue was voted on in the Commons nine years ago and said in December that a private members' bill and a free vote "seems appropriate".

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Assisted dying: 'Simon was decomposing while still alive'

The Labour leader acknowledged "safeguards with teeth" would have to be put in place to protect the vulnerable but said he believed the law should change.

Read more:
'Please make it stop. I'm ready to go': Five stories that bring the assisted dying debate home

MP says current law on assisted dying robbed him of time with his father

"I personally think the law should be changed. There will be people equally passionate, with powerful points to make about why it shouldn't be," he added.

"We have to respect that and find the right balance in the end."

Downing Street said it would be up to parliament whether or not to debate legalising assisted dying.

A Number 10 spokeswoman said Rishi Sunak "has been moved by some of the experiences that have been shared by people and families in this situation".

She added: "It remains the case that this would be for parliament to decide and it would be for government to facilitate its implementation."

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMifmh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L3Npci1rZWlyLXN0YXJtZXItcHJvbWlzZXMtZGFtZS1lc3RoZXItcmFudHplbi1hLXZvdGUtb24tYXNzaXN0ZWQtZHlpbmctaWYtaGUtd2lucy1lbGVjdGlvbi0xMzA5MzQxMdIBAA?oc=5

2024-03-13 00:27:58Z
CBMifmh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L3Npci1rZWlyLXN0YXJtZXItcHJvbWlzZXMtZGFtZS1lc3RoZXItcmFudHplbi1hLXZvdGUtb24tYXNzaXN0ZWQtZHlpbmctaWYtaGUtd2lucy1lbGVjdGlvbi0xMzA5MzQxMdIBAA

Selasa, 12 Maret 2024

Children to stop getting puberty blockers at gender identity clinics, says NHS England - The Guardian

Children who have gender dysphoria will no longer be given puberty blockers, NHS England has said, ahead of a radical change in how it cares for them.

There is not enough evidence about either how safe they are to take or whether they are clinically effective to justify prescribing them to children and young people who are transitioning, it added.

The government welcomed NHS England’s “landmark decision”, which it said was “in the best interests of children”.

NHS England made the announcement in response to the results of a public consultation on the ban, which it first proposed last June, and a review of available evidence by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice).

A spokesperson said: “NHS England has carefully considered the evidence review conducted by NICE and further published evidence available to date.

“We have concluded that there is not enough evidence to support the safety or clinical effectiveness of puberty suppressing hormones to make the treatment routinely available at this time.”

Puberty blockers arrest the physical changes in a child’s body that puberty brings, such as the development of breasts or facial hair. The NHS’s decision means that the new regional services caring for under-18s with gender dysphoria, which open next month, will not use them as part of the treatment.

From now on, children and young people will only be able to get them if they are taking part in a clinical trial. At least one such trial is due to start later this year, but no details, such as who will be eligible to join it, have been published.

The NHS’s decision reaffirms the position it adopted last year on puberty blockers after Dr Hilary Cass, who is leading an independent review into gender identity services for under-18s, issued interim advice warning against routine prescription of the drugs.

In late 2020 NHS England asked Cass, an ex-president of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, to look into gender identity services. At the time they were provided for the whole of England solely by the NHS’s Tavistock and Portman mental health trust in London. Its treatment of under-18s with gender dysphoria, including its use of puberty blockers, had attracted criticism.

Fewer than 100 children and young people are taking puberty blockers.

The trust’s gender identity development service is closing at the end of this month. The first two new centres will open in April at two specialist children’s hospitals: Great Ormond Street in London and Alder Hey children’s hospital in Liverpool. NHS England hopes to ultimately create seven or eight centres.

However, the services they provide will be what NHS sources say will be “fundamentally different from the current service, in line with the Cass recommendations”.

Maria Caulfield, the health minister, said: “We welcome this landmark decision by the NHS to end the routine prescription of puberty blockers and this guidance which recognises that care must be based on evidence, expert clinical opinion and in the best interests of the child.

“The NHS must ensure its Gender Identity Services protect, support and act in the best interests of children and we will continue to work with NHS England to protect children in this area.”

Stonewall voiced its concern about the new policy. “All trans young people deserve access to high quality, timely healthcare”, a spokesperson for the LGBTQ+ rights charity said.

“For some, an important part of this care comes in the form of puberty blockers, a reversible treatment that delays the onset of puberty, prescribed by expert endocrinologists, giving the young person extra time to evaluate their next steps. We are concerned that NHS England will be putting new prescriptions on hold until a research protocol is up and running at the end of 2024.”

Sex Matters, which campaigns on how sex is used in law and other environments, praised NHS England for what it said was a return to evidence-based policymaking in relation to gender identity services.

“This a momentous development in the course correction of NHS England’s approach to treating childhood gender distress,” said Maya Forstater, its executive director.

“The significance of NHS England’s statement that there is not enough evidence to support the safety or clinical effectiveness of puberty blockers cannot be overstated, given the success that activist lobby groups have had in portraying them as a harmless and reversible treatment.”

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMihQFodHRwczovL3d3dy50aGVndWFyZGlhbi5jb20vc29jaWV0eS8yMDI0L21hci8xMi9jaGlsZHJlbi10by1zdG9wLWdldHRpbmctcHViZXJ0eS1ibG9ja2Vycy1hdC1nZW5kZXItaWRlbnRpdHktY2xpbmljcy1zYXlzLW5ocy1lbmdsYW5k0gGFAWh0dHBzOi8vYW1wLnRoZWd1YXJkaWFuLmNvbS9zb2NpZXR5LzIwMjQvbWFyLzEyL2NoaWxkcmVuLXRvLXN0b3AtZ2V0dGluZy1wdWJlcnR5LWJsb2NrZXJzLWF0LWdlbmRlci1pZGVudGl0eS1jbGluaWNzLXNheXMtbmhzLWVuZ2xhbmQ?oc=5

2024-03-12 18:34:00Z
CBMihQFodHRwczovL3d3dy50aGVndWFyZGlhbi5jb20vc29jaWV0eS8yMDI0L21hci8xMi9jaGlsZHJlbi10by1zdG9wLWdldHRpbmctcHViZXJ0eS1ibG9ja2Vycy1hdC1nZW5kZXItaWRlbnRpdHktY2xpbmljcy1zYXlzLW5ocy1lbmdsYW5k0gGFAWh0dHBzOi8vYW1wLnRoZWd1YXJkaWFuLmNvbS9zb2NpZXR5LzIwMjQvbWFyLzEyL2NoaWxkcmVuLXRvLXN0b3AtZ2V0dGluZy1wdWJlcnR5LWJsb2NrZXJzLWF0LWdlbmRlci1pZGVudGl0eS1jbGluaWNzLXNheXMtbmhzLWVuZ2xhbmQ