Selasa, 12 Maret 2024

Children to stop getting puberty blockers at gender identity clinics, says NHS England - The Guardian

Children who have gender dysphoria will no longer be given puberty blockers, NHS England has said, ahead of a radical change in how it cares for them.

There is not enough evidence about either how safe they are to take or whether they are clinically effective to justify prescribing them to children and young people who are transitioning, it added.

The government welcomed NHS England’s “landmark decision”, which it said was “in the best interests of children”.

NHS England made the announcement in response to the results of a public consultation on the ban, which it first proposed last June, and a review of available evidence by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (Nice).

A spokesperson said: “NHS England has carefully considered the evidence review conducted by NICE and further published evidence available to date.

“We have concluded that there is not enough evidence to support the safety or clinical effectiveness of puberty suppressing hormones to make the treatment routinely available at this time.”

Puberty blockers arrest the physical changes in a child’s body that puberty brings, such as the development of breasts or facial hair. The NHS’s decision means that the new regional services caring for under-18s with gender dysphoria, which open next month, will not use them as part of the treatment.

From now on, children and young people will only be able to get them if they are taking part in a clinical trial. At least one such trial is due to start later this year, but no details, such as who will be eligible to join it, have been published.

The NHS’s decision reaffirms the position it adopted last year on puberty blockers after Dr Hilary Cass, who is leading an independent review into gender identity services for under-18s, issued interim advice warning against routine prescription of the drugs.

In late 2020 NHS England asked Cass, an ex-president of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, to look into gender identity services. At the time they were provided for the whole of England solely by the NHS’s Tavistock and Portman mental health trust in London. Its treatment of under-18s with gender dysphoria, including its use of puberty blockers, had attracted criticism.

Fewer than 100 children and young people are taking puberty blockers.

The trust’s gender identity development service is closing at the end of this month. The first two new centres will open in April at two specialist children’s hospitals: Great Ormond Street in London and Alder Hey children’s hospital in Liverpool. NHS England hopes to ultimately create seven or eight centres.

However, the services they provide will be what NHS sources say will be “fundamentally different from the current service, in line with the Cass recommendations”.

Maria Caulfield, the health minister, said: “We welcome this landmark decision by the NHS to end the routine prescription of puberty blockers and this guidance which recognises that care must be based on evidence, expert clinical opinion and in the best interests of the child.

“The NHS must ensure its Gender Identity Services protect, support and act in the best interests of children and we will continue to work with NHS England to protect children in this area.”

Stonewall voiced its concern about the new policy. “All trans young people deserve access to high quality, timely healthcare”, a spokesperson for the LGBTQ+ rights charity said.

“For some, an important part of this care comes in the form of puberty blockers, a reversible treatment that delays the onset of puberty, prescribed by expert endocrinologists, giving the young person extra time to evaluate their next steps. We are concerned that NHS England will be putting new prescriptions on hold until a research protocol is up and running at the end of 2024.”

Sex Matters, which campaigns on how sex is used in law and other environments, praised NHS England for what it said was a return to evidence-based policymaking in relation to gender identity services.

“This a momentous development in the course correction of NHS England’s approach to treating childhood gender distress,” said Maya Forstater, its executive director.

“The significance of NHS England’s statement that there is not enough evidence to support the safety or clinical effectiveness of puberty blockers cannot be overstated, given the success that activist lobby groups have had in portraying them as a harmless and reversible treatment.”

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMihQFodHRwczovL3d3dy50aGVndWFyZGlhbi5jb20vc29jaWV0eS8yMDI0L21hci8xMi9jaGlsZHJlbi10by1zdG9wLWdldHRpbmctcHViZXJ0eS1ibG9ja2Vycy1hdC1nZW5kZXItaWRlbnRpdHktY2xpbmljcy1zYXlzLW5ocy1lbmdsYW5k0gGFAWh0dHBzOi8vYW1wLnRoZWd1YXJkaWFuLmNvbS9zb2NpZXR5LzIwMjQvbWFyLzEyL2NoaWxkcmVuLXRvLXN0b3AtZ2V0dGluZy1wdWJlcnR5LWJsb2NrZXJzLWF0LWdlbmRlci1pZGVudGl0eS1jbGluaWNzLXNheXMtbmhzLWVuZ2xhbmQ?oc=5

2024-03-12 18:34:00Z
CBMihQFodHRwczovL3d3dy50aGVndWFyZGlhbi5jb20vc29jaWV0eS8yMDI0L21hci8xMi9jaGlsZHJlbi10by1zdG9wLWdldHRpbmctcHViZXJ0eS1ibG9ja2Vycy1hdC1nZW5kZXItaWRlbnRpdHktY2xpbmljcy1zYXlzLW5ocy1lbmdsYW5k0gGFAWh0dHBzOi8vYW1wLnRoZWd1YXJkaWFuLmNvbS9zb2NpZXR5LzIwMjQvbWFyLzEyL2NoaWxkcmVuLXRvLXN0b3AtZ2V0dGluZy1wdWJlcnR5LWJsb2NrZXJzLWF0LWdlbmRlci1pZGVudGl0eS1jbGluaWNzLXNheXMtbmhzLWVuZ2xhbmQ

Andrew Tate to be extradited to UK to face rape and human trafficking allegations - The Independent

Andrew Tate will be extradited to the UK to face allegations of sexual aggression after his Romanian trial proceedings have concluded, a court has ruled.

Bedfordshire Police said the force has obtained a European arrest warrant and is working with authorities in Romania.

Controversial influencer Tate, 37, and his brother Tristan, 35, were detained on Tuesday after the UK authorities issued a warrant for charges dating from 2012 to 2015.

Appearing at Bucharest Court of Appeal, a judge approved their extradition for when their trial for separate offences of rape and human trafficking ends. They have both been released from police custody following the hearing.

It comes after lawyers representing four women who accuse Tate of rape and sexual assault wrote to UK police to request his detention over fears he would flee Romania.

Andrew Tate and his brother being escorted into the court hearing

A statement from law firm McCue Jury & Partners, the lawyers acting on behalf of Tate’s British accusers, said: “Last week, we received information that Tate might have been planning to flee Romania, where he is due to stand trial for separate allegations of rape and human trafficking.

It is believed this may have been sparked by comments made by blogger Adin Ross, who told his followers during a Kick live stream on 5 March that he had received a text from Tate, who told him he was leaving Romania for good.

In response, a spokesperson for the Tate brothers said they “unequivocally deny” accusations that they intended to abscond to evade judicial proceedings, adding they were committed to participating in the legal process.

A police officer escorts Andrew Tate from the appeal court in Bucharest, Romania

“We believe this rumour has originated from a popular online influencer who misconstrued a text message from our clients while streaming live. There is simply no truth to it,” their spokesperson said.

The law firm representing the four women said the accusations were the subject of an investigation by Hertfordshire Constabulary closed in 2019, with the Crown Prosecution Service deciding against pursuing charges.

The women announced last year they were preparing to sue Tate in London’s High Court and launched a campaign page, which said it was their “one remaining route to hold him accountable”.

It is understood the current arrest warrant, issued by Westminster Magistrates’ Court, relates to other alleged offences being investigated by Bedfordshire Police.

In a short statement issued on Tuesday, the Tates’ representative said: “This bewildering revival of decade-old accusations has left the Tate brothers dismayed and deeply troubled.

“They categorically reject all charges and express profound disappointment that such serious allegations are being resurrected without substantial new evidence.

Both Tate and his brother ‘categorically deny’ the allegations

“The Tate brothers assert that the timing and circumstances surrounding the reappearance of these allegations raise serious questions about the motives behind this legal action.

“The suggestion that Mr Tate’s rise to fame may have played a role in these developments adds another layer of distress and concern.”

While his lawyer spoke to reporters outside of court, Tate has only tweeted on the platform Twitter/X: “The Matrix is afraid, but I only fear God.” The “Matrix” is a term that he uses to refer to a supposed wide-ranging conspiracy targeting men.

The Tate brothers are also charged with rape, human trafficking and forming a criminal gang to sexually exploit women in a separate case in Romania after being arrested in the country’s capital in December 2022 alongside two Romanian women.

They have denied the charges and are awaiting trial, with Tate winning an appeal in August 2023 to be released from house arrest. Both brothers are now able to travel within Romania but cannot leave the country, with their recent request to visit their hospitalised mother in the UK turned down.

In January, a Romanian court also overturned a decision to seize their assets, which included 15 supercars, more than 10 properties and 14 designer watches.

Former kickboxer Tate has attracted millions of followers in recent years by styling himself as the “king of toxic masculinity” on social media.

He has since been banned from certain platforms including Facebook and Instagram for espousing misogynistic views, which included that women were the property of their husbands.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiYWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmluZGVwZW5kZW50LmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWsvY3JpbWUvYW5kcmV3LXRhdGUtZXh0cmFkaXRlZC11ay1yb21hbmlhLWNvdXJ0LWIyNTExMzkxLmh0bWzSAQA?oc=5

2024-03-12 17:52:01Z
CBMiYWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmluZGVwZW5kZW50LmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWsvY3JpbWUvYW5kcmV3LXRhdGUtZXh0cmFkaXRlZC11ay1yb21hbmlhLWNvdXJ0LWIyNTExMzkxLmh0bWzSAQA

Labour calls on Sunak to return Frank Hester's £10m Tory donation - The Guardian

Labour has written to Rishi Sunak calling for him to hand back £10m in donations from the Conservatives’ biggest ever donor, after it emerged he told colleagues that looking at Diane Abbott made you “want to hate all black women” and said the MP “should be shot”.

Anneliese Dodds, the chair of the Labour party, wrote to the prime minister calling for the money to be returned after the Guardian published details of Frank Hester’s remarks from a meeting held at his company, TPP, in 2019.

The businessman, who has given £10m to the Tories in the past year, said in the meeting that he did not hate all black women. But he also said that seeing Abbott, who is Britain’s longest-serving black MP, on TV meant “you just want to hate all black women because she’s there”.

TPP’s lawyers, Carter-Ruck, said the comments were not a true or accurate characterisation of the company or Hester.

In a new statement on Monday night, a spokesperson for Hester said he “accepts that he was rude about Diane Abbott in a private meeting several years ago but his criticism had nothing to do with her gender nor colour of skin.

“The Guardian is right when it quotes Frank saying he abhors racism, not least because he experienced it as the child of Irish immigrants in the 1970s. He rang Diane Abbott twice today to try to apologise directly for the hurt he has caused her, and is deeply sorry for his remarks. He wishes to make it clear that he regards racism as a poison which has no place in public life.”

In parliament on Monday, Wes Streeting, the shadow health secretary, said Hester had used “utterly revolting, racist and inciteful language”, adding that “it has no place in our politics and public life”.

In her letter to the prime minister, Dodds said the Conservatives should hand back the £10m as well as the value of a helicopter ride to the tune of £15,900 provided to Sunak by Hester.

She wrote: “While – in good faith – we assume that your party was not aware of Mr Hester’s views at the time of receiving these donations, it is only right that you and your party take these new revelations into account seriously.

“Accepting and using that money can only be treated as implicitly condoning and overlooking his deeply disturbing comments and the way he has run his business. Anything less than returning the money will be a stain on the Conservative party.”

She also highlighted that, in February, Hester had spoken about his access to Sunak, claiming that “I’ve had some quite long conversations with Rishi about AI”.

Hester’s remarks were criticised by some Conservatives. Sir Bob Neill, the Conservative MP and chair of the justice committee, told Times Radio: “It’s a stupid and offensive thing to say ... That’s not the sort of language that you should use about anyone that, frankly.”

Alistair Burt, the former Conservative minister, said: “If true, and it appears to be, it is open and shut for the Conservative party. Return the donations, end the relationship and ask decent donors to make up the difference. With MPs under threat, and past murders, this is unacceptable. Many Conservative members will be watching.”

The Liberal Democrats also called for Sunak to rule out giving a peerage to Hester, as well as handing the donations back.

Wendy Chamberlain, the Liberal Democrat chief whip, said: “These comments are inexcusable and disgusting. Ultimately the buck stops with Rishi Sunak.

“He must reassure the public that the Conservative party does not tolerate these remarks. That means confirming that his party will return every penny of these donations and won’t take any more from this donor in future. He must also rule out any future peerage for Frank Hester.”

Hester gave £5m to the Conservatives in May 2023 and announced a further £5m donation this month, which had been accepted by the party from his company in November last year. With months to go before the next general election, a party spokesperson confirmed he was now its “biggest ever donor”.

The Conservatives told LBC: “Mr Hester has made clear that while he was rude, his criticism had nothing to do with her gender nor the colour of her skin. He has since apologised.”

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMia2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRoZWd1YXJkaWFuLmNvbS9wb2xpdGljcy8yMDI0L21hci8xMi9sYWJvdXItY2FsbHMtb24tc3VuYWstdG8tcmV0dXJuLWZyYW5rLWhlc3Rlci10b3J5LWRvbmF0aW9u0gEA?oc=5

2024-03-12 06:55:00Z
CBMia2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRoZWd1YXJkaWFuLmNvbS9wb2xpdGljcy8yMDI0L21hci8xMi9sYWJvdXItY2FsbHMtb24tc3VuYWstdG8tcmV0dXJuLWZyYW5rLWhlc3Rlci10b3J5LWRvbmF0aW9u0gEA

Senin, 11 Maret 2024

Lee Anderson, UK lawmaker dropped by Sunak, defects to right-wing party - Al Jazeera English

Anderson was suspended from the Conservative Party over accusations of Islamophobia.

A prominent former deputy chairman of Britain’s governing Conservatives, who was suspended from the party over accusations of Islamophobia, has defected to the small right-wing Reform UK party in a setback for Prime Minister Rishi Sunak.

The move on Monday by Lee Anderson, a former miner who has courted controversy with his outspoken views, comes months before a national election in which Reform is expected to draw votes away from the Conservatives and in doing so threaten Sunak’s re-election bid.

Anderson’s defection to Reform, which has Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage as its honorary president and backs populist causes such as tougher immigration laws, gives the party its first member of parliament.

It also represents a blow to Sunak, given Anderson was appointed as the Conservatives’ deputy chairman last year to appeal to voters in former Labour Party-voting heartlands known as the “Red Wall”, which backed the Conservatives at the last election.

The New Conservatives, a group of MPs on the right of the Tory party who have rebelled against Sunak, said the Conservative Party was responsible for Anderson’s defection.

“We cannot pretend any longer that ‘the plan is working’. We need to change course urgently,” the group said in a statement.

“I want my country back. … We are allowing people into our country that will never integrate and adopt our British values,” Anderson said at a press conference alongside Reform leader Richard Tice, who predicted more lawmakers would join Reform.

“Reform UK has offered me the chance to speak out in parliament on behalf of millions of people up and down the country who feel that they’re not being listened to.”

Last month the Conservatives suspended Anderson after he refused to apologise for saying London’s first Muslim mayor, Sadiq Khan, was under the control of “Islamists”.

While the Labour Party of opposition leader Keir Starmer is Sunak’s biggest election rival, Reform could win over some traditionally Conservative-leaning voters.

Last month, Reform achieved its best result in one-off parliamentary contests known as by-elections, taking 13 percent of the vote in a constituency in central England, once considered a safe Conservative seat.

The party, founded in 2018 as the Brexit Party, has ruled out making any pre-election deals with the Conservatives.

The Conservatives said the party regretted Anderson’s move.

“Voting for Reform can’t deliver anything apart from a Keir Starmer-led Labour government that would take us back to square one – which means higher taxes, higher energy costs, no action on Channel crossings and uncontrolled immigration,” a Conservative spokesperson said.

Anderson quit his post as one of Conservative Party’s deputy chairmen in January to vote for amendments to toughen up immigration legislation that would revive the government’s plans to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda.

The 57-year-old supports the return of capital punishment, wants asylum seekers to be immediately returned to their countries of origin and earned the nickname “30p Lee” after claiming that decent meals could be made for 30 pence (38 US cents).

The row over Anderson’s comments about London’s mayor came at a sensitive time in British politics as Israel’s war on Gaza exacerbates tensions in Jewish and Muslim communities that have spilled into parliament.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMibmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmFsamF6ZWVyYS5jb20vbmV3cy8yMDI0LzMvMTEvbGVlLWFuZGVyc29uLXVrLWxhd21ha2VyLWRyb3BwZWQtYnktc3VuYWstZGVmZWN0cy10by1yaWdodC13aW5nLXBhcnR50gFyaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYWxqYXplZXJhLmNvbS9hbXAvbmV3cy8yMDI0LzMvMTEvbGVlLWFuZGVyc29uLXVrLWxhd21ha2VyLWRyb3BwZWQtYnktc3VuYWstZGVmZWN0cy10by1yaWdodC13aW5nLXBhcnR5?oc=5

2024-03-11 16:38:27Z
CBMibmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmFsamF6ZWVyYS5jb20vbmV3cy8yMDI0LzMvMTEvbGVlLWFuZGVyc29uLXVrLWxhd21ha2VyLWRyb3BwZWQtYnktc3VuYWstZGVmZWN0cy10by1yaWdodC13aW5nLXBhcnR50gFyaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYWxqYXplZXJhLmNvbS9hbXAvbmV3cy8yMDI0LzMvMTEvbGVlLWFuZGVyc29uLXVrLWxhd21ha2VyLWRyb3BwZWQtYnktc3VuYWstZGVmZWN0cy10by1yaWdodC13aW5nLXBhcnR5

Princess of Wales: Kate photo withdrawn by four news agencies amid 'manipulation' concerns - BBC

Catherine with Prince Louis, Princess Charlotte and Prince GeorgePrince of Wales

Four international photo agencies have retracted a picture of the Princess of Wales and her children over concerns it has been "manipulated".

The image, taken by Prince William for Mother's Day, was the first of Catherine to be released by Kensington Palace since her surgery in January.

But, Getty Images, AFP, Reuters and Associated Press have pulled the photo - noting an "inconsistency in alignment of Princess Charlotte's left hand".

Kensington Palace declined to comment.

The photo shows the princess sitting down, surrounded by Princess Charlotte, Prince Louis and Prince George, the latter wrapping his arms around her.

It was the first official photo of the Princess of Wales since her abdominal surgery two months ago. Since then she has stayed out of the public eye.

The image was posted on the Prince and Princess of Wales's social media accounts with a message from Catherine which said: "Thank you for your kind wishes and continued support over the last two months.

"Wishing everyone a Happy Mother's Day."

It has become a regular routine for the royal couple to release their own photos of special family occasions. More often than not, the photos are taken by Catherine and are issued to the media with instructions on how they can be used.

But, before Prince William's image of his family was posted online, it would have gone through the social media team at Kensington Palace who manage the online accounts of the Prince and Princess of Wales.

It may well have been that some editing was done on the original photo which has now resulted in the discrepancies in its appearance.

The implication here is not that the entire photo is a fake or that the Princess of Wales is more unwell than she appears in the image. That seems unlikely and would be a very high-risk strategy from the Kensington Palace team.

Kate with Prince Louis, Princess Charlotte and Prince George
Prince of Wales

The Mother's Day image was included on the front pages of several national newspapers and websites, including BBC News, and used on TV news bulletins - again including the BBC.

In order to use the new photo as quickly as possible the BBC took the one used by Kensington Palace on their social media accounts.

But, late on Sunday, the Associated Press, one of many international agencies that distributed the photo, issued a "kill notification" - an industry term used to make a retraction.

It said: "At closer inspection it appears that the source has manipulated the image. No replacement photo will be sent."

A second news agency, Reuters, said it too had withdrawn the image "following a post-publication review". This was followed by a third agency, AFP, which also issued a "mandatory kill notice".

Getty Images became the fourth organisation to retract the photograph.

PA Media, the UK's biggest news agency - through which the Royal Family regularly releases its official information, including to the BBC - said it had not killed the picture on its service.

But, a spokesman said the agency was seeking urgent clarification from Kensington Palace over the concerns raised about manipulation.

Most news organisations follow their own strict guidelines on the use of manipulated photographs, only using them when accompanied by an explanation that the image has been changed from the original.

Catherine with Prince Louis, Princess Charlotte and Prince George
Prince of Wales

News agencies, such as AP, therefore make a commitment to their clients that their photos are accurate and not digitally manipulated.

AP's rules only allow "minor adjustments" in certain circumstances, including cropping and toning and colour adjustments, as well as the removal of dust on camera sensors. It says changes in density, contrast, colour and saturation levels "that substantially alter the original scene" are not acceptable.

Social media platform X has posted its own disclaimer on the Prince and Princess of Wales's official account saying the image is "believed to be digitally altered".

At this stage, the more likely explanation is that some overzealous editing of the picture to get it ready for publication has actually cast doubt on its authenticity.

The photo, designed to cool the conversation around the Princess of Wales's recovery, has instead heated all the rumours up again.

Catherine, 42, spent 13 nights at the London Clinic, near Regent's Park in central London, following the surgery.

Prince William visited his wife during her stay and she was visited by the King before he had his own treatment there.

The Palace has shared few details about her condition, which has garnered significant social media speculation, but has said it is not cancer-related.

The team supporting the princess as she recovers is small and limited to those closest to her.

At the time of her stay, the Palace said the princess wanted her personal medical information to remain private, adding that she wanted to "maintain as much normality for her children as possible".

The Palace said it would only provide updates on her recovery when there was significant new information to share.

It was thought on Sunday morning the photo would quell some of the more extreme theories around the princess's absence from the public stage. But within hours social media was abuzz with zoomed-in images of Princess Charlotte's left cuff and Prince Louis' fingers.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiJmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLTY4NTI2OTcy0gEqaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstNjg1MjY5NzIuYW1w?oc=5

2024-03-11 08:17:33Z
CBMiJmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLTY4NTI2OTcy0gEqaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstNjg1MjY5NzIuYW1w

Brianna's mum Esther meets mother of girl who killed her daughter - BBC.com

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

  1. Brianna's mum Esther meets mother of girl who killed her daughter  BBC.com
  2. Brianna's mum Esther meets mother of girl who killed her daughter  BBC
  3. Mothers of Brianna Ghey and one of her murderers meet to discuss parenting  The Guardian
  4. Esther Ghey meets mother of Brianna's killer and is open to 'working with her'  Sky News
  5. Why I met the mother of the twisted teen who murdered my Brianna: Esther Ghey reveals 'emotional' face to face  Daily Mail

https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiJGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy91ay02ODQ5NDQxN9IBKGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy91ay02ODQ5NDQxNy5hbXA?oc=5

2024-03-11 05:02:34Z
CBMiJGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy91ay02ODQ5NDQxN9IBKGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy91ay02ODQ5NDQxNy5hbXA

Officer's four word lie after she was spotted inhaling balloons as partner sniffed 'cocaine' - Liverpool Echo

A Merseyside Police officer claimed "I swear to you I haven't done anything" when confronted after inhaling balloons while her former girlfriend sniffed "cocaine".

Former Constable Ellie Butlin was viewed on CCTV parked at Broughton Retail Park at around 8.30pm on August 6 2023. The officer, who was off duty at the time, was with her former girlfriend who was caught on CCTV snorting a white powder, believed to be cocaine, off the back of her hand.

The ex-girlfriend was then observed handing two balloons to Constable Butlin, who put them in her mouth. The CCTV then showed the balloons inflating and deflating as she inhaled gas from the inside. Constable Butlin and her former partner were approached by a police officer who questioned them about what they were doing in the car park.

READ MORE: Man asked step-dad 'are you alright?' before stabbing him to death in his own bedroom

READ MORE: Officer caught on CCTV inhaling balloon while girlfriend sniffed 'cocaine'

But instead of coming clean and admitting what was happening. Constable Butlin repeatedly lied to the officer, telling him "I swear to you I haven't done anything". At an accelerated misconduct hearing held last week, Merseyside Police Chief Constable Serena Kennedy said: "The former officer's actions and statements were deliberate steps to cover up what happened in the car."

The hearing, held at Merseyside Police HQ in Rose Hill on Cazneau Street, Everton, heard the then serving officer was approached by North Wales Police Constable Hughes, who questioned them about what they were doing in the car park. Constable Hughes asked the now former Constable Butlin if she was the owner of the car, to which she replied "I am".

The officer questioned the women about what they were doing, to which the unnamed former partner responded "they're mine, they're just balloons, they're just whips". Constable Hughes asked Constable Butlin what she was doing, with her replying "no nothing, honestly". Constable Butlin was told she had been observed on CCTV inhaling from a balloon.

However, she continued to deny her involvement and told the officer "I honestly, I swear to you I haven't done anything" and "I haven't done anything". She was interviewed on October 18 last year where she admitted the allegations and was told her failure to challenge or report the incident brought the police force into disrepute.

Constable Butlin was told: "In that witnessing a person taking what you believe to be an illegal drug and failing in any way to challenge that behaviour or otherwise report it, you have acted in a way that has the propensity to bring the police service into disrepute.

"In that in responding to a police officer acting in the execution of his duty, you did not provide a full account and your responses 'no nothing, honestly,' 'I honestly, I swear to you I haven't done anything, honestly' and 'I haven't done anything' were untruthful and therefore dishonest. In any event your response to the officer as a whole lacked integrity as you did not provide a whole account of your actions to the officer."

Detective Superintendent Cheryl Rhodes, who told the hearing the allegations reached the threshold for gross misconduct, said "Butlin should have known better" and due to her actions she was "unsuitable to be an officer". She told the hearing: "The evidence reflects badly on Butlin and could reflect badly on the entire police force, particularly if she would remain in her role."

She added: "Her actions plainly amount to gross misconduct. Constable Butlin was contacted ahead of the hearing and asked if she accepted her actions amounted to gross misconduct. The hearing heard she did not respond and instead handed in her resignation.

Also present at the hearing was Inspector Paula Oldham, her Merseyside Police Federation representative. However, Inspector Oldham told the hearing there would be no representation from Constable Butlin.

Chief Constable Kennedy determined that Constable Butlin had "turned a blind eye to drug use and lied about it". She said: "Her "culpability was high as she didn't take positive action and allowed it to happen in front of her.

"She can't blame anyone else, she was the one who lied. She lied to four questions from Constable Hughes. The former officer's actions and statements were deliberate steps to cover up what happened in the car."

Chief Constable Kennedy added: "The community of Merseyside should have trust and confidence that the officers who uphold the law also abide to the law. I have been very clear that public trust is my number one priority and the actions of the officer erodes that confidence."

The Chief Constable found the officer's actions did amount to gross misconduct and said she would have been immediately dismissed from the police force without notice. However, the now former Constable Butlin resigned before she was sacked.

Following the hearing, Detective Superintendent Rhodes said: "Police officers are expected to behave in an exemplary manner at all times, whether on or off duty, and when they witness illegal activity they are duty bound to report it.

“When they fail in their duties or choose to act in a manner which could bring the police service into disrepute then it is only right that action is taken.

“The public rightly expect those who work for Merseyside Police to be beyond reproach, and I hope that by showing we are taking positive action shows how seriously we take matters such as this.

“I also hope that the actions on one person does not undo the excellent work and commitment show by the vast majority of our officers and staff who work to serve and protect the communities of Merseyside every day.”

Don't miss the biggest and breaking stories by signing up to the Echo Daily newsletter here

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiWWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmxpdmVycG9vbGVjaG8uY28udWsvbmV3cy9saXZlcnBvb2wtbmV3cy9vZmZpY2Vycy1mb3VyLXdvcmQtbGllLWFmdGVyLTI4NzY2ODc50gFdaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cubGl2ZXJwb29sZWNoby5jby51ay9uZXdzL2xpdmVycG9vbC1uZXdzL29mZmljZXJzLWZvdXItd29yZC1saWUtYWZ0ZXItMjg3NjY4NzkuYW1w?oc=5

2024-03-11 07:03:23Z
CBMiWWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmxpdmVycG9vbGVjaG8uY28udWsvbmV3cy9saXZlcnBvb2wtbmV3cy9vZmZpY2Vycy1mb3VyLXdvcmQtbGllLWFmdGVyLTI4NzY2ODc50gFdaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cubGl2ZXJwb29sZWNoby5jby51ay9uZXdzL2xpdmVycG9vbC1uZXdzL29mZmljZXJzLWZvdXItd29yZC1saWUtYWZ0ZXItMjg3NjY4NzkuYW1w