Jumat, 08 Maret 2024

Scappaticci: Report says Army's top IRA spy cost more lives than he saved - BBC

Freddie ScappaticciIMAGES4MEDIA.COM

An Army spy operating at the heart of the IRA during the Troubles in Northern Ireland probably cost more lives than he saved, a report has found.

Operation Kenova investigated the agent known as Stakeknife.

It said speculation he had saved hundreds of lives was wrong; it was more likely between high single figures and low double figures.

It found the security forces failed to prevent some murders to try to protect their agents in the IRA.

But, the report pointed out that it was the IRA leadership that had "commissioned and sanctioned" the actions of its so-called internal security unit - of which Stakeknife was a member - and "committed brutal acts of torture and murder".

The £40m investigation took seven years to examine the activities of Stakeknife, who was Belfast man Freddie Scappaticci.

The interim report called for apologies from the UK government and Irish republican leadership on behalf of the IRA.

Lawyer Kevin Winters, who represents the families of 12 victims, said the report was "a damning indictment of the state".

"The staggering takeaway message is that the state could have intervened to save lives," he said.

"We are left with the horrendous conclusion that both state and the IRA were co-conspirators in the murder of its citizens."

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

The report's author, senior police officer Jon Boutcher, highlighted many failings of the security forces and the UK government, but acknowledged they were acting in an extremely stressful and violent environment.

Multiple murders

Operation Kenova linked Stakeknife to at least 14 murders and 15 abduction incidents.

Despite it being widely known that Scappaticci was Stakeknife, the Kenova Report did not officially confirm that. A further, more detailed report is due to be published by the Kenova team later this year.

However, the interim report said Stakeknife was "undoubtedly a valuable asset" to the security forces who "provided high-quality intelligence about PIRA [Provisional IRA] at considerable risk to himself".

The 208-page report added: "Albeit that his intelligence was not always passed on or acted upon and if more of it had been, he could not have remained in place as long as he did."

Mr Boutcher, who is now chief constable of the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI), said claims Stakeknife saved hundreds of lives were based on "unreliable and speculative" assessments.

Mr Boutcher said murders that could, and should, have been prevented were allowed to take place with the knowledge of the security forces.

'You were not mad'

"Morality and legality of agents doing any harm - with the knowledge of the state - is something that we would never, ever allow today," he said.

Mr Boutcher also referred to the decision not to confirm Stakeknife's identity in his report.

"Stakeknife's identity has been exposed to Kenova, subject to confidentiality which I remain bound by and I cannot make his name public without official authority," he said.

So far the government has refused to give such authority.

The panel is speaking at a presser at Stormont Hotel in Belfast
PA Media

But Mr Boutcher added that in his view this position was "no longer tenable" and he expected the "government to authorise Kenova to confirm Stakeknife's identity in the final report".

Referring to Stakeknife's victims, Mr Boutcher said many of them had endured "endless delays, setbacks and unfulfilled promises in their search for the truth".

He said his report confirmed what many families had suspected - patterns of state intervention and non-intervention in the torture and murder of people accused of being state agents during the Troubles.

"You were not mad. This was happening and this should not have happened," Mr Boutcher told them.

Among the cases investigated by Operation Kenova was the killing of Caroline Moreland, a Catholic mother of three who was abducted and murdered by the IRA in July 1994.

Speaking before the report was published, her daughter Shauna said her main goal was to "get someone to say that her life mattered".

"I didn't want prosecutions, I didn't care about that. I just wanted answers," she said.

Caroline Moreland
PAcemaker

The report called for an apology from the "republican leadership" for the IRA's "abduction, torture and murder of those it accused or suspected of being agents during the Troubles" and for the acknowledgement of "the loss and unacceptable intimidation bereaved families and surviving victims have suffered".

Sinn Féin was the political wing of the IRA throughout the Troubles. Since the IRA ended its violent campaign in 2005, the party is now considered the dominant voice representing Irish republicanism.

Sinn Féin deputy leader Michelle O'Neill, the first minister of Northern Ireland, was asked by the BBC if she would apologise.

Ms O'Neill apologised "for every single loss of life, and that is without exception" - something she also said in her first speech after becoming first minister.

Party president Mary Lou McDonald echoed Ms O'Neill's comments.

"To all those who have suffered such grievous loss, I am sorry for all the lives lost during the conflict and the hurt and loss endured, without exception," she said.

NI Deputy First Minister Emma Little-Pengelly, of the DUP, called on the republican leadership "to step up and own what has been done".

She asked for an acknowledgement for victims that "the murder and torture of people, informer or not, was absolutely wrong".

She added: "It's one thing to say, 'We are sorry for all deaths but that's very different to saying, 'It was wrong, it should not have happened, there was always an alternative'".

Ms Little-Pengelly said the informer and agent system was "a necessary part in tackling terrorism" but added that it is "also clear that things could have been done differently and there are serious lessons to be learned".

Michelle O'Neill speaks at a press conference
PA Media

Northern Ireland Secretary Chris Heaton-Harris said the report contained "several specific, very serious allegations that remain subject to consideration by the courts".

"It would not be right for the government to make any comment on the substance of the interim report until the conclusion of litigation related to it," he said.

"I would like to put on record again my deepest sympathy with all the families who lost loved ones during the Troubles - including as a result of the actions of the Provisional IRA," he added.

Tánaiste (Irish deputy prime minister) Micheál Martin said Sinn Féin "should unreservedly apologise and state unequivocally that the PIRA's activities and actions were wrong".

"The report makes clear the challenging circumstances facing those who worked to keep people safe throughout the Troubles," he added.

"However, it also states that serious crimes "were not prevented when they could and should have been" by the elements of the security forces, and said this was "a profound failure and an appalling dereliction of duty".

Scappaticci died in England in 2023 at the age of 77.

The report said speculation he was still alive was "unhelpful".

Mr Boutcher said: "I have independently verified when, where and how Mr Scappaticci died and can confirm he died of natural causes following an illness."

Prior to his death, the Public Prosecution Service (PPS) was considering whether to charge Scappaticci with murder and other offences, after receiving files of evidence from the Operation Kenova team.

Mr Boutcher wrote in the report: "I believed (the files) contained strong evidence of very serious criminality on the part of Mr Scappaticci.

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

"We first attempted to submit these in October 2019 and it will never be known whether an earlier decision by the PPS [Public Prosecution Service] would have resulted in prosecution and, if so, conviction."

Nobody will be prosecuted as a result of the report.

In December, the PPS said 15 other people would not face any action.

Following this, there were further decisions not to prosecute anyone, including people who are alleged to have been IRA members and retired soldiers involved in agent handling.

Director of public prosecutions Stephen Herron said that "the PPS has not been funded adequately to progress legacy casework".

"The reality is that the PPS did not have sufficient resources to progress the Kenova decisions more quickly and that remains the position in relation to legacy cases more generally," he said.

He said that "skilled and experienced prosecutors and counsel" dedicated "the majority of their time, since 2020, to working on these cases".

"As is acknowledged within the report, any delay in decision-making was related to inadequate resources," he continued.

"I hope that the funding requirements of all parts of the justice system are recognised in future discussions about potential prosecutions in legacy cases and the need to progress these more quickly."

Who was Freddie Scappaticci and what did he do?

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Freddie Scappaticci joined the IRA in the 1970s and towards the end of that decade was recruited by the Army as an agent.

Throughout the 1980s he operated within the IRA's so-called internal security unit - known as the "nutting squad".

Its primary purpose was to identify informers who were then kidnapped, tortured and shot dead.

Scappaticci himself was implicated in multiple killings while at the same time working as a spy, passing on intelligence about the IRA.

The IRA became suspicious of him around 1990 and stood him and his unit down.

He was unmasked in the media in 2003 and although he denied the allegation, he moved into hiding in England where he died in 2023.

What else does Operation Kenova report say?

The investigation found that the use of agents by security forces "undoubtedly saved lives during the Troubles" and "significantly degraded and debilitated the effectiveness of terrorist groups".

"Less frequently", it said, preventable and serious crimes took place and went unsolved and unpunished as security forces tried to protect their agents.

These included:

  • Murders committed by agents - including some cases where one agent murdered another
  • Murders of alleged or suspected agents, including cases where the murder was carried out as a punishment and to deter others from acting as agents - in some cases the victim was not actually an agent
  • Murders in some of these cases which were known about by the security forces in advance and could have been prevented

The report acknowledged some of these cases were "uniquely challenging" for the security forces, who were acting under "exceptionally stressful conditions and extreme time pressures".

The report said victims and families were failed both by the authorities and their communities, that victims were not protected and terrorists were not subjected to criminal justice.

It said the republican leadership had "failed to acknowledge and apologise for PIRA's murderous activities and the intimidation of families".

The IRA's so-called internal security unit noted, was responsible for "inhumane and degrading treatment and murder, including of children, vulnerable adults, those with learning difficulties and those who were entirely innocent of the claims made against them".

It said the unit sometimes accused people of being agents because its members wanted to "eliminate rivals" or kill the partners of those involved in extra-marital affairs.

It recommended that the longest day - 21 June - should be a day of remembrance for everyone injured or harmed during the Troubles.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiN2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLW5vcnRoZXJuLWlyZWxhbmQtNjg1MTAzOTDSATtodHRwczovL3d3dy5iYmMuY28udWsvbmV3cy91ay1ub3J0aGVybi1pcmVsYW5kLTY4NTEwMzkwLmFtcA?oc=5

2024-03-08 17:16:22Z
CBMiN2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLW5vcnRoZXJuLWlyZWxhbmQtNjg1MTAzOTDSATtodHRwczovL3d3dy5iYmMuY28udWsvbmV3cy91ay1ub3J0aGVybi1pcmVsYW5kLTY4NTEwMzkwLmFtcA

Police stop boy, 11, driving BMW towing caravan along M1 - The Guardian

Police who stopped a black BMW X5 towing a suspected stolen caravan along the M1 have admitted to being stunned by the identity of the driver: an 11-year-old schoolboy.

A spokesperson for North Yorkshire police said officers were “staggered” by the incident, which took place on Thursday.

The force said they received a call that a caravan had been stolen from a holiday site near the market town of Thirsk. The caller said it was being towed by a black BMW.

Officers managed to track the vehicle, which was using cloned registration plates, travelling south on the A1. The car was followed as it joined the M1 at the Hook Moor interchange near Garforth and was then stopped by police, 45 minutes after the caravan was first stolen.

“Nothing prepared us for finding the schoolboy sat at the wheel,” said the spokesperson. “A search of the car also revealed equipment typically used by suspects to carry out thefts and a selection of vehicle registration plates.”

Sgt Paul Cording, of North Yorkshire police, said on X: “Even after over 23 years’ service, you come across things that you struggle to comprehend. Like yesterday when some great fast-track work from the team identified a recently stolen caravan being towed by a vehicle on false plates, but then to find the driver was only 11 years old.”

The boy was arrested on suspicion of a number of offences including theft, burglary, going equipped for theft, and motoring offences including dangerous driving. He was questioned and has been released on conditional police bail to allow further enquiries to be carried out.

The caravan’s rightful owners have been alerted and no one was injured during the incident, the spokesperson added.

North Yorkshire police said they had seen an increase in caravan theft recently and urged owners to consider fitting security devices, particularly tracking devices.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiZmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRoZWd1YXJkaWFuLmNvbS91ay1uZXdzLzIwMjQvbWFyLzA4L3BvbGljZS1zdG9wLWJveS0xMS1kcml2aW5nLWJtdy10b3dpbmctY2FyYXZhbi1hbG9uZy1tMdIBZmh0dHBzOi8vYW1wLnRoZWd1YXJkaWFuLmNvbS91ay1uZXdzLzIwMjQvbWFyLzA4L3BvbGljZS1zdG9wLWJveS0xMS1kcml2aW5nLWJtdy10b3dpbmctY2FyYXZhbi1hbG9uZy1tMQ?oc=5

2024-03-08 16:09:00Z
CBMiZmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRoZWd1YXJkaWFuLmNvbS91ay1uZXdzLzIwMjQvbWFyLzA4L3BvbGljZS1zdG9wLWJveS0xMS1kcml2aW5nLWJtdy10b3dpbmctY2FyYXZhbi1hbG9uZy1tMdIBZmh0dHBzOi8vYW1wLnRoZWd1YXJkaWFuLmNvbS91ay1uZXdzLzIwMjQvbWFyLzA4L3BvbGljZS1zdG9wLWJveS0xMS1kcml2aW5nLWJtdy10b3dpbmctY2FyYXZhbi1hbG9uZy1tMQ

Pro-Palestine protesters target Lord Balfour painting at Trinity College in Cambridge - Sky News

Politicians have condemned a "moronic act of vandalism" after pro-Palestine activists damaged a portrait of Lord Balfour.

Palestine Action shared a video on social media of a demonstrator defacing and slashing the historic painting, which hangs at the University of Cambridge's Trinity College.

In the clip, a woman can be seen spraying red paint before using a sharp object to slice open the canvas.

Lord Arthur James Balfour was a Conservative prime minister between 1902 and 1905. He later became the foreign secretary, when he signed the Balfour Declaration in 1917.

The declaration was a public statement issued by the British government which viewed "with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people".

The letter is blamed by some for launching the process that ended up with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

Palestine Action said the declaration "paved the way for ethnic cleansing" of people in Palestine.

Pointing to the ongoing war in Gaza, the protest group claimed Britain's support "for the continued colonisation of Palestine hasn't wavered since 1917".

The painting of Lord Balfour was by artist Philip Alexius de Laszlo and was completed in 1914.

A protest targeting a painting of Lord Arthur James Balfour, the former prime minister and foreign secretary, at Trinty College, Cambridge. Pic: Palestine Action
Image: A protest targeting a painting of Lord Arthur James Balfour, the former prime minister and foreign secretary, at Trinty College, Cambridge. Pic: Palestine Action

Politicians were quick to condemn the stunt.

Deputy Prime Minister Oliver Dowden said he was "appalled by the moronic act of wanton vandalism".

"Perpetrators should face the full force of the law," he added in a post on X.

Lord Walney, the government's adviser on political violence and disruption, said: "This is outrageous. We must not tolerate protesters thinking they can get away with senseless damage because they think the importance of the cause gives them the moral high ground to cause mayhem."

A spokesperson for Cambridge Police said: "This afternoon we received an online report of criminal damage today to a painting at Trinity College, Cambridge.

"Officers are attending the scene to secure evidence and progress the investigation.

"No arrests have been made at this stage."

Read more:
Activists gather at council meeting to demand ceasefire
Protests turning London into 'no-go zone for Jews'

Trinity College said in its own statement that it "regrets the damage caused to a portrait of Arthur James Balfour during public opening hours".

The College added: "The police have been informed.

"Support is available for any member of the College community affected."

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMieWh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L3Byby1wYWxlc3RpbmUtcHJvdGVzdGVycy10YXJnZXQtbG9yZC1iYWxmb3VyLXBhaW50aW5nLWF0LXRyaW5pdHktY29sbGVnZS1pbi1jYW1icmlkZ2UtMTMwOTAwNDPSAX1odHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9hbXAvcHJvLXBhbGVzdGluZS1wcm90ZXN0ZXJzLXRhcmdldC1sb3JkLWJhbGZvdXItcGFpbnRpbmctYXQtdHJpbml0eS1jb2xsZWdlLWluLWNhbWJyaWRnZS0xMzA5MDA0Mw?oc=5

2024-03-08 17:07:36Z
CBMieWh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L3Byby1wYWxlc3RpbmUtcHJvdGVzdGVycy10YXJnZXQtbG9yZC1iYWxmb3VyLXBhaW50aW5nLWF0LXRyaW5pdHktY29sbGVnZS1pbi1jYW1icmlkZ2UtMTMwOTAwNDPSAX1odHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9hbXAvcHJvLXBhbGVzdGluZS1wcm90ZXN0ZXJzLXRhcmdldC1sb3JkLWJhbGZvdXItcGFpbnRpbmctYXQtdHJpbml0eS1jb2xsZWdlLWluLWNhbWJyaWRnZS0xMzA5MDA0Mw

UK military capability at risk, MPs warn - BBC.com

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

UK military capability at risk, MPs warn  BBC.comView Full coverage on Google News
https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiLWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy91ay1wb2xpdGljcy02ODUwMTM3MNIBMWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy91ay1wb2xpdGljcy02ODUwMTM3MC5hbXA?oc=5

2024-03-07 23:02:41Z
CBMiLWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy91ay1wb2xpdGljcy02ODUwMTM3MNIBMWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy91ay1wb2xpdGljcy02ODUwMTM3MC5hbXA

Theresa May to stand down as MP at next election - BBC

Theresa MayPA Media

Former prime minister Theresa May has said she will be standing down as an MP at the next election.

In a statement, she said she had taken the "difficult decision" to vacate her Maidenhead seat after 27 years.

Mrs May, prime minister from 2016 to 2019, said causes such as tackling modern slavery were taking an "increasing amount" of her time.

But she is now one of 64 Tory MPs who have announced their decision to leave the Commons.

They include former ministers Dominic Raab, Chris Grayling, Ben Wallace, Sajid Javid and George Eustice.

In the statement to the Maidenhead Advertiser, she said she had "always done her best" to respond to the needs of local people.

Mrs May, 67, became prime minister in July 2016 after the resignation of David Cameron following the Brexit referendum. She had been his home secretary for six years and was a chief architect of the so-called "hostile environment" for immigrants, which led to "go home" vans being sent into areas with large migrant communities.

Her three years in Downing Street were dogged by the Brexit aftermath.

A snap election in 2017 saw her lose her majority, but she remained at Number 10 after striking a deal with the DUP.

Eventually, opposition to her proposed Brexit deal led to Conservative MPs holding a confidence vote in her leadership, and although she survived her authority was diminished and she announced her resignation in a tearful speech five months later.

Her leadership style was often described by critics as "robotic" - something she famously answered with a "Maybot" dance before a Conservative party conference.

Theresa May does the 'Maybot'
PA Media

She was replaced by Boris Johnson, who faced criticism from Mrs May from the backbenches, before he left Downing Street following a mass revolt by ministers over his leadership, sparked by scandals including Partygate.

Mrs May is now one of 64 Tory MPs and about 100 from across all parties who will stand down at the end of this parliament.

She said: "Since stepping down as prime minister I have enjoyed being a backbencher again and having more time to work for my constituents and champion causes close to my heart, including most recently launching a Global Commission on Modern Slavery and Human Trafficking.

"These causes have been taking an increasing amount of my time.

"Because of this, after much careful thought and consideration, I have realised that, looking ahead, I would no longer be able to do my job as an MP in the way I believe is right and my constituents deserve.

"I have therefore taken the difficult decision to stand down at the next general election."

She said she remained committed to supporting Rishi Sunak, the current prime minister, and added that she believed the Conservatives could win the election, which is expected to be held later this year.

Mrs May said there was "no greater privilege" than being an MP, and said serving as prime minister and home secretary would "not have been possible" without the people of Maidenhead.

Gareth Davies, a Treasury minister, said he was saddened by the decision. "I think it's very good when former leaders stay in the House of Commons and contribute to debates," he told Sky News.

"She's certainly brought a lot to debates since she's stood down, and so I'm very sad personally, but wish her well and I think she's justified in moving on after 27 years."

He denied that the number of Tories standing down indicated a lack of confidence in the party's prospects. "This is what happens when you approach a new election," he said.

Anneliese Dodds, the shadow secretary of state for women and equalities, said Mrs May's decision was further evidence of a lack of confidence in Rishi Sunak.

"I think this really strengthens those calls for change, those calls for a general election," she said.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTY4NTA5MjM50gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNjg1MDkyMzkuYW1w?oc=5

2024-03-08 08:11:31Z
CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTY4NTA5MjM50gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNjg1MDkyMzkuYW1w

Budget 2024: What does it mean for benefits, Universal Credit and cost of living? - The Independent

Chancellor Jeremy Hunt presented his highly-anticipated spring Budget on Wednesday, delivering on his widely-expected 2 per cent cut to national insurance.

Amongst Mr Hunt’s other policy announcements came changes to child benefits, a new levy on vaping products, and a major overhaul of the ‘non-dom’ tax status.

The chancellor has called his changes to national insurance contributions a “tax cut for working people,” however it has been pointed out that the tax burden for low-earners may actually still be higher than it was a few years ago.

Jeremy Hunt delivers his 2024 spring Budget to Commons

Responding to the chancellor’s statement, Sir Keir Starmer said that the government is asking people to “pay more and more for less and less”.

“Food prices still 25 per cent higher than they were 2 years ago, rents up 10 per cent, an extra £240 a month for a typical family remortgaging this year, because they lost control of the economy,” he said.

A few of the chancellor’s changes will have a positive impact those on low-incomes, providing limited support for those most in need during the ongoing cost of living crisis.

Below we look at what the 2024 Budget means for people on Universal Credit, receiving other benefits, or low-incomes:

Household Support Fund extended

The Household Support Fund (HSF) is money given to all local councils to support vulnerable households in their area. It was due to end on 31 March, with no indication of an extension from the government.

That has been addressed by Mr Hunt in his spring Budget, giving local councils another six months of HSF funding. Local authorities and poverty charities have been calling for this for months.

Many councils had already begun declining new applications for help before the end of March deadline, but this will give struggling households an extra financial lifeline for half a year longer.

Labour Leader Keir Starmer responds to the Budget

Cllr Shaun Davies, Chair of the Local Government Association, said: “We are pleased the Chancellor has extended the Household Support Fund (HSF), which has helped millions of households facing hardship.

“It is disappointing that we had to wait until the very last minute for an extension, and that it is only for a short period. Three-quarters of councils expect hardship to increase further in their area over the next 12 months.”

Each local council allocates its HSF funding differently, based on how it feels it will best serve the area. To find out what support is available to you, the End Furniture Poverty charity offers a helpful assistance finder tool.

Extension to budgeting advance loans pay back

The government currently offers a ‘budgeting advance loan’ for people on UC facing an emergency lack of money. Prior to the budget, the repayment period for these loans was 12 months. It has now been doubled to 2 years.

These loans are interest-free, and automatically deducted from Universal Credit payments. You can borrow an ‘advance’ of up to:

  • £348 if you’re single
  • £464 if you’re part of a couple
  • £812 if you have children

Money Saving Expert Martin Lewis welcomed the move, tweeting: “This is a welcome move. It lessens the burden on some the payback of lowest incomes.”

Debt Relief Order fees scrapped

Those struggling with debt in the UK are able to apply for a Debt Relief Order (DRO) from the government. You will need to meet specific criteria, including owing less than £30,000 and having less than £75 a month spare income.

Prior to the budget, the application fee for a DRO was £90. This will be abolished from 6 April. You will still need to contact an approved debt advisor, such as Citizens Advice, to apply.

Jeremy Hunt and PM Rishi Sunak in Commons on 6 March

Responding the the budget Dame Clare Moriarty, Chief Executive of Citizens Advice, said: “Today the Chancellor supported people in the most dire situations.”

“These unaffordable fees have priced people out of getting the support they need as 9 in 10 people with a DRO struggled to pay the upfront cost.”

“But we’re expecting this year to be just as tough, if not worse, than the last 18 months for many.”

Are benefits going to rise?

The chancellor did not address benefits in his spring Budget, so they remain set to rise from 1 April. This was announced by Mr Hunt in his autumn statement last year, confirming they would rise in line with at 6.7 per cent in line with inflation.

However, the rise does not meet the inflation hikes of the prior year, which reached a peak of 11.1 per cent in October 2022.

Responding to the budget, Paul Kissack, Chief Executive of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation said: “This was a Budget for big earners and big owners.

“Cutting national insurance gives you an eye-catching headline but doesn’t fill the gap for the millions in our country experiencing deepening poverty.

“For the people struggling to afford the rent or the weekly shop, or having to visit a food bank, that widening gulf is all too real”.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiZ2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmluZGVwZW5kZW50LmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWsvaG9tZS1uZXdzLzIwMjQtc3ByaW5nLWJ1ZGdldC1oaWdobGlnaHRzLWRlYnQtcmVsaWVmLWIyNTA5MjE0Lmh0bWzSAQA?oc=5

2024-03-08 06:43:38Z
CBMiZ2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmluZGVwZW5kZW50LmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWsvaG9tZS1uZXdzLzIwMjQtc3ByaW5nLWJ1ZGdldC1oaWdobGlnaHRzLWRlYnQtcmVsaWVmLWIyNTA5MjE0Lmh0bWzSAQA

Kamis, 07 Maret 2024

Pensioners suffer biggest losses from Tory tax raid as Hunt boosts millennials - The Telegraph

Millions of pensioners are facing a £1,000 hit from Rishi Sunak and Jeremy Hunt’s stealth tax raid, amid a growing backlash over the Chancellor’s decision to prioritise millennials in the Budget.

The Resolution Foundation and the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) said the elderly and higher earners would be the biggest losers by the end of this parliament because pensioners will not not benefit from recent cuts to National Insurance.

In its analysis of the Budget, the Resolution Foundation warned that eight million retirees faced an average £1,000 hit to their incomes as a result of a six year freeze on income tax thresholds.

Paul Johnson, director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), said pensioners paying higher tax rates faced an even bigger hit of £3,000 as a result of policies announced in this parliament.

He added that “well over” 60pc of pensioners were now subject to income tax.

In total, pensioners will be collectively paying £8bn more in taxes by the end of this parliament.

By contrast, the Resolution Foundation’s analysis showed that people aged between 18 and 45 stood to gain £590 on average. Millennials aged between 25 and 34 will benefit most, gaining an average of £620 per household.

The findings led to warnings that the Conservative Party risked alienating voters.

Former employment minister Ann Widdecombe said: “Considering how much of their vote is the grey vote, it’s just unbelievable that in an election year they just decided to pretend we don’t exist.”

Steve Webb, who served as pensions minister in the coalition government, said: “Clearly far too many pensioners have been dragged into the income tax net. The new state pension is nearly the same as the personal tax allowance, so people with just a state pension and a little bit more are now taxpayers. That means millions of people have the hassle of dealing with HMRC in their retirement, so it is disappointing that the tax threshold wasn’t raised.”

The Resolution Foundation said the raid on pensioners marked a significant shift in state support over the past five years, “from the rich and the old to the young and the poor”.

It said this was in “marked contrast” to the approach taken by former chancellor George Osborne in the 2010s, who chose to focus support on pensioners and cut benefits for poorer working-age households.

Senior government sources suggested this was a conscious choice driven by a need to fund the triple-lock on state pensions. The policy guarantees that payments rise in line with the highest of prices, earnings or 2.5pc every year.

Ministers believe that cuts to National Insurance will encourage more people into work and help to grow the economy.

“If we want to keep on increasing pensions by the triple lock, which is an unbelievably good deal, you must have a growing economy that keeps paying for it,” a senior government source said.  

The Chancellor cut National Insurance paid by workers by a further 2p in the Budget, matching reductions announced in last November’s Autumn Statement.

Jeremy Hunt was forced to defend his decision to cut National Insurance instead of income tax, insisting the Government had already done an “enormous amount for pensioners”.

He said: “This government introduced the triple lock … we have really prioritised pensioners.”

The Conservatives will pledge to keep the triple lock if re-elected.

Pensioners will not benefit from the National Insurance reductions because they are already exempt from paying it. Many have private pensions as well as state support, tipping them over the £12,570 tax-free threshold or into higher tax bands.

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) welcomed the cuts to National Insurance that it described as being “aimed at incentivising work”. 

A spokesman said Mr Hunt had spoken to managing director Kristalina Georgieva following the Budget and described the tax increases used to fund them, including abolishing non-dom status as “well-conceived revenue-raising measures”.

However, the IMF repeated a warning that tax rises would be needed to stabilise debt in the medium term.

While 78pc of the personal tax cuts announced in Mr Hunt’s Budget benefit the richest half of households, the Resolution Foundation said the richest fifth of households would in fact lose an average of £1,500 a year once all tax and benefit changes announced this parliament are taken into account.

Meanwhile, the poorest fifth of households have gained £840 a year. The Resolution Foundation’s analysis found that low income households today stand to benefit from more generous welfare payments compared to 2019.

Support for millennials and younger people announced in the Budget includes keeping more of their £24-a-week benefit for first children after Mr Hunt raised the income threshold at which the state starts to claw back payments to £60,000.

Changes to Universal Credit this parliament means lower income young people keep more of their benefits if they work more.

Meanwhile, the Resolution Foundation said that the Government’s failure to raise tax thresholds in line with inflation meant the average taxpaying pensioner would be £1,000 a year worse off compared to the start of this parliament.

The think tank said: “In total, the policy will have increased taxes for pensioners by around £8bn, a significant portion of the net personal tax rise.

“It is clear that the pensioners’ incomes are set to fall the most as a result of policy changes made during this parliament.”

The Prime Minister’s spokesman said the Government’s “commitment to pensioners is very clear.”

Mr Sunak’s spokesman added: “The Chancellor set out... the priority with National Insurance, which is obviously to cut tax on hardworking families, but he also obviously set out an ambition to end the unfairness of double taxation of income. Now clearly, those above the state pension age already benefit from that.”

Recent polling suggests the Prime Minister’s strategy is risky. Three in five (59pc) of people aged 65 or over voted Conservative at the last election, according to the British Election Study.

However, the Telegraph’s poll of polls shows just 39pc of over-65s plan to vote Tory at this year’s national poll, with 25pc set to back Labour and 17pc supporting Reform UK.

Torsten Bell, chief executive of the Resolution Foundation, described the pace of tax changes over the past few years as “frenetic” with “huge rises and cuts announced in quick succession”.

He said: “Middle earners have come out on top, while taxpayers earning below £26,000 or over £60,000 will lose out. The biggest group of losers are pensioners, who face an £8bn collective hit.”

The Resolution Foundation noted that retirees had benefited substantially from the triple lock on state pensions that ensures payments rise in line with whichever is highest out of inflation, average wage growth or 2.5pc in April each year.

The think tank said: “Pensioners in general cannot be considered to be a low-income group. The triple lock has led to increases in the state pension not just in real terms but also as a fraction of average earnings; and the recent rocketing of interest rates has boosted savings income, particularly benefiting pensioners, while hitting predominantly working-age mortgagors.”

Mr Hunt has extended a freeze on income tax thresholds for six years, boosting Treasury coffers through a phenomenon known as fiscal drag that means more people end up paying taxes as their income rises.

The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) has highlighted that if the tax-free personal allowance on work was lifted in line with inflation, it would have reached £16,310 by the end of decade. As things stand, it is estimated to rise to just over £12,800.

The Resolution Foundation said: “High-income households will lose out the most from threshold freezes, while also being affected by other changes to Capital Gains Tax and pension taxes; a few of the very rich will also lose from changes to non-dom taxation.”

Despite Mr Hunt’s desire to paint the Conservatives as the party of tax cuts, Mr Johnson pointed out that the tax burden remained on course to rise to its highest share of GDP since 1948.

He said: “The context remains one of very big increases in tax over this parliament and more forecast over the next few years.

“Tax has risen to a higher fraction of national income than it has ever been in my lifetime, and I don’t expect it to return to its previous level for the rest of my lifetime.”

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiaGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRlbGVncmFwaC5jby51ay9idXNpbmVzcy8yMDI0LzAzLzA3L3BlbnNpb25lcnMtbG9zc2VzLXRvcnktdGF4LXJhaWQtaHVudC1ib29zdHMtbWlsbGVubmlhbHMv0gEA?oc=5

2024-03-07 20:01:00Z
CBMiaGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRlbGVncmFwaC5jby51ay9idXNpbmVzcy8yMDI0LzAzLzA3L3BlbnNpb25lcnMtbG9zc2VzLXRvcnktdGF4LXJhaWQtaHVudC1ib29zdHMtbWlsbGVubmlhbHMv0gEA