Kamis, 22 Februari 2024

Tories and SNPs walk out of Commons in protest at speaker in Gaza ceasefire vote - The Independent

Chaos broke out in the House of Commons on Wednesday night as furious MPs walked out in protest at the speaker’s handling of the Gaza ceasefire debate.

Dozens also signed a vote of no confidence against him.

Members on both sides left the chamber in anger after Sir Lindsay Hoyle allowed amendments from the government and Labour on the SNP’s motion calling for “an immediate ceasefire” in the Israel-Hamas war, which has cost more than 29,000 lives according to the Gaza health ministry.

This broke convention in which only the government’s amendment should have been debated and voted on.

In a night of extraordinary drama in Westminster, the speaker’s decision prompted howls of protest from MPs and shouts of “bring back Bercow” – referring to his controversial predecessor, John Bercow.

He was then forced to return to the Commons to issue a grovelling apology for the mayhem, which was thwarted by shouts of “resign” from MPs on both sides of the House.

Conservative Party and SNP MPs leave the chamber on Wednesday evening

The evening descended into chaos after Sir Lindsay ruled that the Commons should vote first on Labour’s call for an “immediate humanitarian ceasefire” before moving on to the SNP’s original motion, and then finally onto the government’s proposals if either of the first two failed to garner enough support.

Both Tory and SNP MPs walked out, leaving Labour’s amendment to pass unopposed.

Commons Leader and Tory MP Penny Mordaunt accused the speaker of hijacking the debate and undermining the confidence of the House by selecting Labour’s amendment.

She said he had “raised temperatures” and put MPs in a “more difficult position”.

Sir Lindsay had been warned by House of Commons clerk Tom Goldsmith about the unprecedented nature of his decision before his clash with MPs, the senior official saying he felt “compelled to point out that long-established conventions are not being followed in this case”.

The speaker now faces a no-confidence motion, which was gathering support from both Conservative and SNP members across the House.

Proposed by Tory MP William Wragg, it had been signed by 33 Tory and SNP MPs late on Wednesday evening.

Sir Lindsay tried to quell the fury of MPs by telling the Commons: “I thought I was doing the right thing and the best thing, and I regret it, and I apologise for how it’s ended up.

“I do take responsibility for my actions, and that’s why I want to meet with the key players who have been involved.”

Sir Lindsay announces his decision on amendments to the SNP’s Gaza ceasefire motion

But his efforts were jeered, and Mr Wragg claimed ministers had approached him saying they wanted to sign his no confidence motion.

Shadow Commons leader Lucy Powell said the government does not have the numbers for a majority on their motion, as she defended Sir Lindsay.

She told MPs: “Last time I looked, the government benches had a majority in this House, so if they don’t like the amendments that are before them, they could vote this evening to defeat those amendments.

“But they have decided now not to, I understand, vote in those debates. So perhaps we have to ask the question whether or not they do still command a majority in this House this evening, or whether they are trying to hide behind some other reason?”

Suggestions that the speaker had been influenced by threats from senior Labour figures to call their amendment were wrong, insisted deputy speaker Dame Rosie Winterton.

Conservative MP Philip Davies referred to a tweet claiming the speaker had been warned Labour would “bring him down” after the general election unless he called their Gaza amendment.

Amid shouts of “shocking” and jeers from Tory MPs, Mr Davis added: “Can you assure the house that everything will be done to identify who it was that put that intolerable pressure on the House of Commons speaker?”

Dame Rosie replied: “That tweet is wrong and the statement is incorrect.”

As the Commons descended into farce, Conservative former ministers were among those MPs suggesting the votes in the Gaza debate should be run again.

Trying to explain his actions by trying to allow all three amendments, Sir Lindsay said: “Today’s debate was exceptional in its intensity with which all parties wished to secure a vote.”

He said he had taken his decision with the right intentions to allow as many MPs as possible to express their view.

People with Palestinian flags queued to get into parliament for the Gaza vote

“I wanted to do the best, and it was my wish to do the best by every member of this House.”

He went on: “I was very concerned, I am still concerned... about the security of members, their families and the people that are involved.

“I am, and I regret with my sadness, that it’s ended up in this position. That was never my intention for it to end like this. I was absolutely convinced that the decision was done with the right intentions.”

Helen McEachern, chief executive of Care International UK, said she was dismayed by the “political theatrics” over parliamentary procedure that did nothing to help the people of Gaza.

“Without an immediate sustained ceasefire, they will not receive the food, water and medical supplies needed to save lives and prevent further injuries,” she said.

Sir Keir Starmer defended his party’s amendment, saying it was intended to unite parliament and “speak with one voice on the horrendous situation in Gaza and Israel”.

He insisted it was a “serious plan for such an incredibly serious situation” and accused the other parties of playing politics.

“Unfortunately, the Conservatives and the SNP decided to walk out hand in hand, refusing to vote on this serious matter, yet again choosing political games over serious solutions.”

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiY2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmluZGVwZW5kZW50LmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWsvcG9saXRpY3MvZ2F6YS1jZWFzZWZpcmUtdm90ZS1nb3Zlcm5tZW50LWNvbW1vbnMtYjI1MDAxNTIuaHRtbNIBAA?oc=5

2024-02-22 07:32:32Z
CBMiY2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmluZGVwZW5kZW50LmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWsvcG9saXRpY3MvZ2F6YS1jZWFzZWZpcmUtdm90ZS1nb3Zlcm5tZW50LWNvbW1vbnMtYjI1MDAxNTIuaHRtbNIBAA

Rabu, 21 Februari 2024

Keir Starmer 'escapes' major Labour revolt over Gaza ceasefire vote - Evening Standard

Then, 56 Labour MPs rebelled and 10 frontbenchers resigned or were sacked after voting for a previous SNP ceasefire motion. But this week, the language from Washington and other Israeli allies in favour of a truce has dramatically hardened, giving Sir Keir more room for manoeuvre, and the Speaker’s ruling will be a huge relief.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMibWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnN0YW5kYXJkLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvcG9saXRpY3Mva2Vpci1zdGFybWVyLWxvbmRvbi1sYWJvdXItZ2F6YS1jZWFzZWZpcmUtdm90ZS1jb21tb25zLWIxMTQwNDkwLmh0bWzSAQA?oc=5

2024-02-21 16:03:56Z
CBMibWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnN0YW5kYXJkLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvcG9saXRpY3Mva2Vpci1zdGFybWVyLWxvbmRvbi1sYWJvdXItZ2F6YS1jZWFzZWZpcmUtdm90ZS1jb21tb25zLWIxMTQwNDkwLmh0bWzSAQA

Trident missile test fails for second time in a row - BBC

Still image taken from video of an unarmed Trident missile firing from HMS Vigilant in 2012UK Ministry of Defence / Crown copyright

The test firing of a Trident missile from a Royal Navy submarine has failed, for the second time in a row.

The latest test of the UK's nuclear deterrent was from HMS Vanguard and was witnessed by the defence secretary.

The missile's booster rockets failed and it landed in the sea close to the launch site, according to the Sun, which first reported the malfunction.

When on patrol missiles would usually carry nuclear warheads but they are not fitted for test fires.

The Ministry of Defence said the "nuclear deterrent remains safe, secure and effective".

This is highly embarrassing for both the UK and the US manufacturer of the Trident missile.

British tests of Trident missiles are rare, not least because of the costs. The price tag of each missile is around £17m and the last test was in 2016 when it also ended in failure when the missile veered off course.

Both the Defence Secretary Grant Shapps and the head of the Navy were on board HMS Vanguard off the east coast of the US when it fired the unarmed test missile in January.

The submarine had just had a more than seven year refit.

A defence source close to the Mr Shapps insisted the Trident "could absolutely fire in a real world situation" if it needed to.

"The issue that occurred during the test was specific to the event and would not have occurred during a live armed fire," the source said.

A written ministerial statement is expected from Mr Shapps later.

The missile was supposed to have flown several thousand miles before landing harmlessly in the Atlantic between Brazil and West Africa. Instead it dropped into the ocean near to where it was launched.

At the time of the failed 2016 test, the Sunday Times reported that it was launched from HMS Vengeance off the coast of Florida.

The paper said the Trident II D5 missile was intended to be fired 3,700 miles (5,954 km) to a sea target off the west coast of Africa but veered towards the US.

The cause of what went wrong remains top secret, the paper reported, but quoted a senior naval source as saying the missile suffered an in-flight malfunction after launching out of the water.

An image of the HMS Vanguard submarine half submerged, with people walking along the top
ROYAL NAVY

The Labour Party has called for assurances over the effectiveness of the nuclear deterrent.

Shadow defence secretary John Healey said: "Reports of a Trident test failure are concerning.

"The defence secretary will want to reassure Parliament that this test has no impact on the effectiveness of the UK's deterrent operations."

The Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) described it as an expensive failure following a reported £500m refit.

"We need to stop wasting our money on this," the group said who campaign to get rid of nuclear weapons in Britain and worldwide.

In a statement the Ministry of Defence admitted an anomaly had occurred in the most recent launch. But it also said that HMS Vanguard and its crew had been "proven fully capable" in their operations and the test had "reaffirmed the effectiveness of the UK's nuclear deterrent".

The statement added that Trident was the "most reliable weapons system in the world" having completed more than 190 successful tests.

HMS Vanguard is one of four of the Vanguard-class nuclear submarines that have been on patrol in 1994, with one of the vessels continually at sea.

The submarines are based at Faslane Royal Navy base on the Firth of Clyde and carry US-built Trident 2 D5 missiles, while the nuclear warheads are stored at the nearby Coulport armaments depot on Loch Long.

Annual running costs are estimated at 6% of the defence budget - around £3bn for 2023/24, according to the House of Commons Library.

The V-class is due to be replaced by the bigger Dreadnought-class submarines in the 2030s.

Between £31bn and £41bn has been put aside for the wider programme of replacing the Vanguard-class submarines, the House of Commons Library said.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiJmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLTY4MzU1Mzk10gEqaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstNjgzNTUzOTUuYW1w?oc=5

2024-02-21 10:05:06Z
CBMiJmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLTY4MzU1Mzk10gEqaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstNjgzNTUzOTUuYW1w

'Unwell' Wikileaks founder faces final day of extradition hearing - live - The Independent

<p>Stella Assange took to the stage outside the High Court  </p>

Stella Assange took to the stage outside the High Court

Julian Assange is facing a second day in the High Court as part of long-standing battle against extradition to the US, where he is accused of leaking confidential military secrets.

He was unable to attend the first day of the hearing as his barrister told the court was too unwell.

The WikiLeaks founder is wanted by US authorities over an alleged conspiracy to obtain and disclose national defence information following the publication of hundreds of thousands of leaked documents relating to the Afghanistan and Iraq wars.

Lawyers for the 52-year-old argued that if extradited, he would face a “flagrant denial of justice” by prejudiced judges, and was being prosecuted for an “ordinary journalistic practice”.

The two-day hearing comes after a judge ruled in January 2021 that Assange should not be sent to the US, given a real risk of suicide while ruling against him on all other issues.

However, this was successfully challenged by US authorities, which would have resulted in his extradition. Assange, who is currently based in HMP Belmarsh in south-east London, is now asking for the go-ahead to challenge the original judge’s dismissal of other parts of his case.

1708502624

Assange misses first day of hearing due to illness

Julian Assange missed the first day of his extradition hearing on Tuesday due to illness, his lawyer said.

Assange, 51, has been held in London’s high security Belmarsh Prison for almost five years while US authorities seek to extradite him to face trial on espionage charges linked to the publication of hundreds of thousands of documents relating to the Afghanistan and Iraq wars.

In a January 2021 ruling, then-district judge Vanessa Baraitser said that Assange should not be extradited, but authorities in the US subsequently brought a successful challenge against this decision.

Lawyers for deeply controversial figure Assange will now ask for the go-ahead to challenge the original judge’s dismissal of other parts of his case against extradition in the two-day hearing.

The barrister said at the outset of the hearing on Tuesday that the Wikileaks founder is not attending the hearing as he is unwell.

It comes after his brother, Gabriel Shipton, told TalkTV that Assange’s health was “delicate” and “deteriorating” ahead of the hearing.

Athena Stavrou21 February 2024 08:03
1708498800

US bid to prosecute Julian Assange is ‘state retaliation’, court told

The United States’ bid to prosecute Julian Assange is “state retaliation”, the High Court has heard in his final bid for an appeal in the UK.

The WikiLeaks founder faces extradition to the US over an alleged conspiracy to obtain and disclose national defence information following the publication of hundreds of thousands of leaked documents relating to the Afghanistan and Iraq wars.

In a January 2021 ruling, then-district judge Vanessa Baraitser said that Assange should not be sent to the US, citing a real and “oppressive” risk of suicide, while ruling against him on all other issues.

Read the full article here

Holly Evans21 February 2024 07:00
1708495200

The many twists and turns of Julian Assange’s lengthy fight against extradition

The WikiLeaks founder faces extradition to the US over an alleged conspiracy to obtain and disclose national defence information.

Here is a timeline of some key dates spanning more than a decade of legal woes for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.

Read the full article here

Holly Evans21 February 2024 06:00
1708491600

Julian Assange’s brother says WikiLeaks founder is ‘suffering’ with health ‘deteriorating’ in prison

Julian Assange’s brother has said the WikiLeaks founder’s health is deteriorating in Belmarsh Prison as he prepares to face his final bid for appeal against extradition to the US.

In a January 2021 ruling, then-district judge Vanessa Baraitser said that Assange should not be extradited, but authorities in the US subsequently brought a successful challenge against this decision.

Read the full article here

Holly Evans21 February 2024 05:00
1708488000

Julian Assange’s wife appears to compare WikiLeaks founder to Alexei Navalny

Julian Assange’s wife appears to compare WikiLeaks founder to Alexei Navalny

Julian Assange’s wife appeared to compare her husband to Russian politician and Putin critic Alexei Navalny, whose death was announced last week as he served a sentence in a remote Arctic prison. The WikiLeaks founder, who has been held in London’s Belmarsh prison, is appealing against extradition to the US where he faces charges of conspiracy to obtain and disclose national defence information after the publication of intelligence files on the website. “Political prisoners die in prison. That’s what happens. We’ve seen it just last week with what happened to Navalny, and what happened to Navalny could happen to Julian,” Stella Assange said on Tuesday (20 February).

Holly Evans21 February 2024 04:00
1708484400

What is WikiLeaks?

Assange founded the website WikiLeaks in 2006. Using his computing skills, he created an online platform for people to anonymously submit classified leaks such as documents and videos.

Since its birth it has released around 10 million classified documents, including files on US military activities in the US.

It rose to prominence in April 2010 when it published a classified video showing a 2007 US helicopter attack in Iraq’s capital Baghdad that killed a dozen people, including two Reuters journalists.

On the Afghanistan war, it’s claimed more than 90,000 classified US military documents were released and on the invasion of Iraq around 400,000 confidential US files.

The leaks, described as the largest security breaches of their kind in US military history, angered and embarrassed US politicians and military officials who claimed the disclosure put lives at risk.

But defenders of the website say it reveals unreported incidents including the killing of civilians.

Holly Evans21 February 2024 03:00
1708480800

Letters: The treatment of Julian Assange could be the end of democracy

If Julian Assange is extradited to America, that will be the end of democracy in Britain. Assange has done nothing wrong; we should all be very grateful for his exposure of the murderous actions of American troops.

America, in my opinion, does not have a justice system, it has a legal system designed purely for the enrichment of the legal profession. I have more respect for the “oldest profession” than I do for the legal profession. It should never be a question of whether it is legal or illegal, it should be a question of whether it is right or is it wrong.

Read the full article here

Holly Evans21 February 2024 02:00
1708477200

Watch: Protests outside High Court where Julian Assange fighting US extradition

Holly Evans21 February 2024 01:00
1708473600

Lawyer for the US says Assange put ‘safety of individuals at serious risk'

James Lewis KC, for the US, said in written submissions that Assange’s conduct is “consistently and repeatedly misrepresented” in the appeal bid.

The barrister described the amount of classified material provided to Assange as “unprecedented”, adding: “The appellant threatened damage to the strategic and national security interests of the United States and put the safety of individuals at serious risk.”

Mr Lewis, who is expected to make oral arguments on behalf of the US on Wednesday, added that the original judge ruled Assange was not being prosecuted for political reasons but “because he is alleged to have committed serious criminal offences”.

<p>Julian Assange is fighting against extradition to the United States (Dominic Lipinski/PA)</p>

Julian Assange is fighting against extradition to the United States (Dominic Lipinski/PA)

“This decision is unimpeachable and there is no error to show that the district judge got it wrong,” he continued.

He added that it was “simply not credible” that a journalist would be immune from criminal prosecution in these circumstances.

Holly Evans21 February 2024 00:00
1708470055

Assange supporters describe hearing as ‘most important freedom of speech case in the 21st century’

One speaker on a stage outside the Royal Courts of Justice welcomed protesters to the “most important freedom of speech case in the 21st century”.

He was greeted with cheers and claps from the crowd of protesters. Tim Dawson, deputy general secretary at the International Federation of Journalists, then took to the stage.

He said: “Be under no illusions, if this prosecution is successful, other vital cases will never come to light.”

“Free Julian Assange, support journalism and safeguard free speech,” he finished, to claps and cheers from the audience.

Holly Evans20 February 2024 23:00

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMidmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmluZGVwZW5kZW50LmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWsvaG9tZS1uZXdzL2p1bGlhbi1hc3NhbmdlLWhlYXJpbmctd2lraWxlYWtzLWV4dHJhZGl0aW9uLW5ld3MtbGF0ZXN0LWIyNDk5NDIxLmh0bWzSAQA?oc=5

2024-02-21 08:17:49Z
CBMidmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmluZGVwZW5kZW50LmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWsvaG9tZS1uZXdzL2p1bGlhbi1hc3NhbmdlLWhlYXJpbmctd2lraWxlYWtzLWV4dHJhZGl0aW9uLW5ld3MtbGF0ZXN0LWIyNDk5NDIxLmh0bWzSAQA

David Neal: Immigration and borders watchdog sacked for leaking critical reports - BBC.com

By Callum May

PA Media David NealPA Media
David Neal "lost the confidence of the home secretary"

Home Secretary James Cleverly has sacked the government's immigration watchdog after details of critical reports appeared in newspapers.

The Home Office said David Neal had "breached the terms" of his role and leaked confidential information.

Mr Neal was quoted in The Daily Mail about security checks on private jets.

Meanwhile, sources close to him said he was responsible for details of another unpublished report about visas for care workers appearing in The Times.

The comments made by Mr Neal in the Mail triggered an urgent question in Parliament on Tuesday, with immigration minister Tom Pursglove telling the Commons the Home Office "categorically" rejected claims that hundreds of high-risk flights had landed in the UK without security checks.

Mr Neal told the paper he had seen Home Office data suggesting that 21% of private jets classified as high risk, which came into London City Airport, were inspected by immigration officials last year.

"This is a scandal, and incredibly dangerous for this country's border security", he was quoted as saying.

But Mr Pursglove said UK Border Force performed checks on "100% of scheduled passengers arriving in the UK and risk-based intelligence-led checks on general aviation".

He added that an issue with the data meant some flights had been classified as high-risk when they should have been low-risk.

He described it as "deeply disturbing that information which has no basis in fact was leaked by the independent chief inspector to a national newspaper before the Home Office had the chance to respond".

A Home Office spokesperson said: "We have terminated the appointment of David Neal, the independent chief inspector of borders and immigration (ICBI), after he breached the terms of appointment and lost the confidence of the home secretary.

"The planned recruitment process for the next ICBI is in progress."

Mr Neal, whose tenure was due to end on 21 March, told the Times on Tuesday that he had not made the decision to speak to the media "lightly". He added: "But I've been forced into this because my reports aren't being published."

"I've spent all my working life protecting this country, I've identified a security failing and I've brought it back to the Home Office," he is quoted as saying.

"There's a strong public interest here and that's why I've done what I've done. The border is there to keep us safe, it's critical that there are clear auditable risk decisions made to protect every one of us in the country."

Shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper, who tabled the question, said this was an example of "total Tory chaos on borders and immigration".

"A series of Conservative home secretaries have sought to bury uncomfortable truths revealed by the chief inspector about our broken borders, and shockingly they are still sitting on 15 unpublished reports - stretching back to April last year," she said.

Ms Cooper also called on Mr Cleverly to "publish those reports in full".

The government website lists 14 ICIBI inspection reports that are awaiting publication. Ms Cooper's office is understood to be including the inspector's annual report in the total.

The Liberal Democrats' home affairs spokesperson Alistair Carmichael also called for the reports to be published "without delay".

"This is a desperate move from a Conservative government terrified of proper scrutiny of their record of failure on borders and immigration," he added.

Mr Neal is a former army officer who commanded a brigade of the Royal Military Police.

The report about the social care system - details of which appeared in the Times - is understood to reflect Mr Neal's concern about the Home Office's oversight of compliance with the immigration rules by social care employers.


Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiJGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy91ay02ODM1NDM3N9IBKGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy91ay02ODM1NDM3Ny5hbXA?oc=5

2024-02-21 05:43:55Z
CBMiJGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy91ay02ODM1NDM3N9IBKGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy91ay02ODM1NDM3Ny5hbXA

Senin, 19 Februari 2024

Post Office scandal: Kemi Badenoch hits back at ex-chairman - BBC.com

By Nick Edser

PA Media Kemi BadenochPA Media

Business Secretary Kemi Badenoch has hit back at claims made by former Post Office chairman Henry Staunton about the reasons for his departure.

Mr Staunton told the Sunday Times that when he was sacked Ms Badenoch had told him: "Someone's got to take the rap."

But Ms Badenoch said the comments were a "disgraceful misrepresentation" of their conversation.

Mr Staunton also said he was told to delay payouts to Post Office scandal victims, which the government denies.

Hundreds of subpostmasters were prosecuted because of glitches in the Horizon IT system between 1999 and 2015 in what has been called the biggest miscarriage of justice in UK history.

Mr Staunton was appointed Post Office chairman in December 2022, but left the post last month after Ms Badenoch said "new leadership" was needed to tackle the scandal.

Speaking to the Sunday Times, Mr Staunton said he first heard about his sacking when he was called by Sky News. He then spoke to Ms Badenoch on the phone.

Mr Staunton also told the paper that shortly after joining the Post Office he was told by a senior civil servant to slow down the rate of compensation payments, apparently to help the government's finances.

"Early on, I was told by a fairly senior person to stall on spend on compensation and on the replacement of Horizon, and to limp, in quotation marks - I did a file note on it - limp into the election," he told the paper.

"It was not an anti-postmaster thing, it was just straight financials. I didn't ask, because I said: 'I'm having no part of it - I'm not here to limp into the election, it's not the right thing to do by postmasters'."

UK Parliament Henry StauntonUK Parliament
Henry Staunton stood down as Post Office chairman last month

In a lengthy post on X, formerly Twitter, Ms Badenoch said Mr Staunton's comments were a "disgraceful misrepresentation of my conversation with him and the reasons for his dismissal".

"Far from 'taking the rap', I dismissed Staunton due to very serious allegations about his conduct while chair of the Post Office, including blocking an investigation into that conduct.

"Henry Staunton had a lack of grip getting justice for postmasters. The serious concerns over his conduct were the reasons I asked him to step down," she added.

She said that her conversation with him was carried out with officials and they took a "complete record". A statement will be made on Monday "telling the truth", she added.

Earlier a spokesman for the government had said it "utterly" refuted the claims made by Mr Staunton over stalling compensation payments.

"The government has sped up compensation to victims, and consistently encouraged postmasters to come forward with their claims," the spokesman said.

"To suggest any actions or conversations happened to the contrary is incorrect. In fact, upon appointment, Mr Staunton was set concrete objectives, in writing, to focus on reaching settlements with claimants - clear evidence of the government's intent."

A spokesperson for Mr Staunton told the BBC his client would be making no further comment but that he stood by the accusations made in the Sunday Times.

They also said there was no investigation into Mr Staunton.

Shadow business secretary Jonathan Reynolds said: "The Horizon scandal is widely accepted to be one of the worst miscarriages of justice in British history.

"Under no circumstances should compensation to victims be delayed and to do so for party political purposes would be a further insult to subpostmasters.

"The Labour Party has called for all subpostmasters to be exonerated and compensation paid swiftly so that victims can begin to draw this awful chapter to a close."

Liberal Democrat leader Ed Davey said Mr Staunton's claims were "deeply disturbing" and called for ministers to explain to Parliament "exactly what has happened at the earliest opportunity".

The slow pace of overturning convictions and making compensation payments has led some to call for a mass exoneration of those affected.

Mr Staunton told the Sunday Times that Post Office chief executive Nick Read had written to the Justice Secretary Alex Chalk with legal opinion from the Post Office's solicitors, Peters & Peters, that in more than 300 cases convictions were supported by evidence not related to the Horizon software.

"Basically it was trying to undermine the exoneration argument," Mr Staunton said. "It was 'most people haven't come forward because they are guilty as charged' - i.e. think very carefully about exoneration."

A spokesperson for the Post Office said it was "very aware of the terrible impact from this appalling scandal and miscarriage of justice".

"We refute both the assertions put to us and the words and phrases allegedly used, and are focused on supporting the government's plans for faster justice and redress for victims, as well as helping the Inquiry get to the truth of what happened," they said.

The spokesperson added: "In no sense did the Post Office seek to persuade government against mass exoneration. We remain firmly committed to supporting faster justice and redress for victims".

  • LISTEN: The extraordinary story of a decade-long battle with the Post Office, fought by their own sub-postmasters, on BBC Sounds.
Banner saying 'Get in touch'

Are you affected by the issues raised in this story? Share your experiences by emailing haveyoursay@bbc.co.uk.

Please include a contact number if you are willing to speak to a BBC journalist. You can also get in touch in the following ways:

If you are reading this page and can't see the form you will need to visit the mobile version of the BBC website to submit your question or comment or you can email us at HaveYourSay@bbc.co.uk. Please include your name, age and location with any submission.


Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiKmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy9idXNpbmVzcy02ODMzMDQ2NdIBLmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy9idXNpbmVzcy02ODMzMDQ2NS5hbXA?oc=5

2024-02-19 02:14:30Z
CBMiKmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy9idXNpbmVzcy02ODMzMDQ2NdIBLmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy9idXNpbmVzcy02ODMzMDQ2NS5hbXA

Major search resumes for missing toddler who fell into River Soar – updates - The Independent

<p>The River Soar (Nigel French/PA)</p>

The River Soar (Nigel French/PA)

A frantic search for a toddler who fell into a river while out with his family is ongoing in Leicester, while a man has been rushed to hospital.

The two-year-old boy has been missing since Sunday after he fell into the River Soar.

The major search operation is set to continue with “additional specialist teams” on Monday morning, Leicestershire Police said.

Emergency services attended the scene just after 5pm and a search and rescue operation to find the boy began in Aylestone Meadows, close to Marsden Lane, to the south of Leicester city.

Footage posted online showed police on a bridge near Riverside Drive. A helicopter was also seen hovering above the scene using a searchlight to scan the area.

A man from the scene was taken to hospital “as a precautionary measure”, police said.

Police have urged to people not to attend the scene over fears of rising water levels and safety risks, after they received a number of requests to offer support in the search operation.

1708326659

Residents express ‘heartbreak’ over possible drowning of boy

Residents in Leicester expressed their shock and heartbreak over the news of a two-year-old boy going missing in the river.

Many of them took to social media to express solidarity with the family and urged people to not crowd the site where police were leading the search.

“This is so so sad I could see from my house the amount of specialist services that were searching but it got dark very quickly I couldn’t stop thinking about it all through the night,” resident Vicki Hudson said on Facebook.

Another said that while everyone wants to go down and help “I don’t think it’s the best idea”.

“It’s heartbreaking and such sad circumstances but I think the police and specialists know best at this point. Please be extra careful. No matter how good of a swimmer you could be, with the floods etc it’s dangerous,” the user said.

Shweta Sharma19 February 2024 07:10
1708324270

Police ‘suspended search’ at night

Police suspended the search last night and said they would resume work in the morning, according to reports.

A police helicopter was seen in the skies searching the river at about 5.40pm. It was later replaced with a drone.

The helicopter then returned at 6.40pm after refuelling.

Last night in a statement the police said: “The operation is ongoing and will continue with additional specialist teams in the morning.”

However, it was reported by the Daily Mail that officers suspended their search as conditions got darker around the swollen river and canal in Aylestone.

Shweta Sharma19 February 2024 06:31
1708322475

Residents describe ‘horrible’ scenes in Leicester after boy goes missing

Many residents of Leicestershire have described the chaotic scenes around the city after a two-year-old boy fell into the river.

A resident said he saw people going down the River Soar with just their phone torch lights and called it “reckless” amid the warnings from police to not go near the river.

“Just went by Middleton Street, people going down to the river with just their phone torches, very silly and reckless,” a resident said on X.

Many residents have rallied around the family and emergency services and offered support in the search for the child.

However, Leicestershire Police have urged members of the public not to go near the river due to dangerous rising water levels.

“We have had a number of offers of support to assist with the search and would kindly ask that people do not attend the scene due to rising water levels and safety risks,” the police said.

Another resident said: “Horrible looking scenes down Middleton Street. Had to turn around and divert. Hope there’s good news at the end of it all”.

A resident, Luke Donnachie, said he was out looking for the boy.

He said “there was a certain point in the river” which splits into two and a part of it has “trees and branches all built up in the water”.

“I couldn’t get in the water myself but could be worth a professional search in case gets caught up with the flow, will be such a long shot now so many hours after,” he said.

“Thoughts and prayers going out to the family at this horrendous time, as a parent myself to a 4-year-old I couldn’t think of anything worse hence why I just had to go out and at least have a little search.”

Shweta Sharma19 February 2024 06:01
1708320923

One person taken to hospital

Police said a man was taken to hospital “as a precautionary measure” after the boy fell into the river.

Leicestershire Police said the child’s family are being supported by specialist officers.

The force said: “Our thoughts are with them at this extremely difficult time.

“We have had a number of offers of support to assist with the search and would kindly ask that people do not attend the scene due to rising water levels and safety risks.”

They urged the public to provide information if anyone has any information or comes across anything.

People are asked to contact 999 with information quoting incident 476:180224.

Shweta Sharma19 February 2024 05:35
1708320606

Major search after boy, 2, falls into river in Leicestershire

A major search is underway for a two-year-old boy who fell into a river in Leicestershire. Police are looking for the child in the River Soar after the report came in around 5pm yesterday.

Officers said the boy was with his family when he entered the water and he had not been found by 10.30pm. Emergency services attended and a search and rescue operation began in Aylestone Meadows, close to Marsden Lane.

Footage posted online shows police on a bridge near Riverside Drive. A helicopter was also seen hovering above the scene using a searchlight to scan the area.

Read our full report.

Shweta Sharma19 February 2024 05:30
1708319953

Boy missing for more than 12 hours

A two-year-old boy has been missing for more than 12 hours after he fell into the River Soar in Leicester.

The boy, who has not been named, was with his family when the incident happened on Sunday and police attended the scene at 5pm.

A search operation has been launched to find the boy around Aylestone Meadows.

Police said the child was not located “despite the best efforts” of all those at the site, in a statement issued at 10.30pm last night.

“The operation is ongoing and will continue with additional specialist teams in the morning,” police said.

Details about the circumstances in which the boy fell into the river are unknown.

Shweta Sharma19 February 2024 05:19
1708318111

Welcome to The Independent’s coverage of a major search operation in Leicestershire to find a two-year-old boy who fell into the river and has been missing since

Shweta Sharma19 February 2024 04:48

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMibGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmluZGVwZW5kZW50LmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWsvaG9tZS1uZXdzL2xlaWNlc3Rlci1taXNzaW5nLWJveS1yaXZlci1zb2FyLWxhdGVzdC11cGRhdGUtYjI0OTgzNjYuaHRtbNIBAA?oc=5

2024-02-19 08:57:19Z
CBMibGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmluZGVwZW5kZW50LmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWsvaG9tZS1uZXdzL2xlaWNlc3Rlci1taXNzaW5nLWJveS1yaXZlci1zb2FyLWxhdGVzdC11cGRhdGUtYjI0OTgzNjYuaHRtbNIBAA