Rabu, 06 Desember 2023

Boris Johnson Covid Inquiry LIVE: Ex-PM to face second day's grilling - The Independent

Boris Johnson denies deleting Whatsapp messages ahead of Covid inquiry

Boris Johnson is to face a second day of grilling at the covid inquiry on Thursday.

The former prime minister will return to the hearing having been booed by crowds of bereaved families on Wednesday.

During his first day of testimony, Mr Johnson’s apology to the nation was interrupted by four people who staged a protest in the hearing room.

Mr Johnson arrived three hours early on Wednesday morning to dodge the protesters waiting outside. During the day he admitted the pandemic’s impact on the NHS had “bewildered” him. He also acknowledged the government’s policy appeared “incoherent” on the timing of actions in light of the graph in March 2020 suggesting the NHS could be overwhelmed.

Mr Johnson stumbled over his words as the inquiry heard he lost 5,000 WhatsApp messages between January 2020 and June 2020.

He also implied the mad cow disease crisis in Britain made him sceptical of the threat of coronavirus as it “wasn’t nearly as fatal as people had originally believed”.

1701932400

Johnson to return to inquiry for second day

Boris Johnson is set to return to the covid inquiry for a second and final day of evidence on Thursday.

Mr Johnson spent a full day addressing his handling of the pandemic on Wednesday.

During his testimony he admitted ‘underestimating’ threat of Covid in early days of pandemic.

The former prime minister is the most senior politician to address the inquiry to date, following an appearance by former health secretary Matt Hancock last week.

Sam Rkaina7 December 2023 07:00
1701928800

Boris Johnson was the wrong prime minister at the wrong time

Read our editorial after the first day of Boris Johnson’s evidence at the inquiry: The words of Lee Cain, Boris Johnson’s former director of communications, hung over his old boss’s evidence to the Covid inquiry. “Covid,” he said, “was the wrong crisis for this prime minister’s skillset.”

He can say that again. But he does not need to, because so many other people are saying it, too – including, by implication, Mr Johnson himself, whose wavering and inconsistent evidence today confirmed the impression of him as someone incapable of making up his mind.

The inquiry heard from the politician who wrote an article arguing one side of a case and then another article arguing the other side. There are great advantages in intellectual openness, and in testing the strengths of different arguments from different viewpoints, and Mr Johnson always displays a great deal of pluralism. Unfortunately, he neither seems to have focused sufficiently on the detail, nor to have decided a broad approach and stuck to it.

Even now, more than three years after the events being inquired into, he seems unable to decide what he thought. He started with a patently insincere apology, saying how sorry he was that people had died. He then admitted that he had made mistakes (unspecified), without actually apologising for them. He then veered between cautious defiance in defence of his record and a show of contrition, at one point holding his head and appearing to be close to tears.

Sam Rkaina7 December 2023 06:00
1701925200

Pictures of protesters that met Boris Johnson outside inquiry

Sam Rkaina7 December 2023 05:00
1701921600

‘No guarantee’ sacking Hancock would have led to better replacement

Boris Johnson considered removing Matt Hancock from his job as health secretary at the height of the pandemic but there was no guarantee he would be “trading up” if he put someone else in.

The former prime minister backed Mr Hancock at the UK Covid-19 Inquiry, saying he had done a “good job in very difficult circumstances” as the Government struggled to get to grips with Covid-19 in 2020.

The former health secretary has been criticised by a number of witnesses at the Covid-19 inquiry, including Dominic Cummings and former civil service chief Lord Sedwill.

The inquiry heard that in one WhatsApp exchange with the permanent secretary at No 10, Simon Case, who is the current Cabinet Secretary, Lord Sedwill joked it was necessary to remove Mr Hancock to “save lives and protect the NHS”.

WhatsApp messages shared with the inquiry also revealed that former top Number 10 adviser Mr Cummings repeatedly pushed Mr Johnson to sack Mr Hancock.

At one stage, Mr Cummings claimed Mr Hancock had “lied his way through this and killed people and dozens and dozens of people have seen it”.

<p>Boris Johnson and Matt Hancock previously found to have broken rules around post-ministerial jobs</p>

Boris Johnson and Matt Hancock previously found to have broken rules around post-ministerial jobs

Sam Rkaina7 December 2023 04:00
1701918000

‘He only apologised because he got found out'

Commenting on the remarks, Sammie McFarland, chief executive of Long Covid Kids, said: “Boris Johnson didn’t apologise for using the language because it was wrong; he only apologised because he got found out and his actions have caused years of bullying and stigma for people suffering from Long Covid.

“We need a sincere apology.

“But more than that we need action and the inquiry to create meaningful and impactful recommendations going forward.

“Johnson also said that people think they are unwell. He needs to recognise that this is a real disease and a consequence of the pandemic alongside the unfortunate deaths and hospitalisations.”

<p>Former prime minister Boris Johnson said he ‘regretted’ his remarks about long Covid  </p>

Former prime minister Boris Johnson said he ‘regretted’ his remarks about long Covid

Sam Rkaina7 December 2023 03:00
1701914400

Mr Johnson ‘meant no disrespect’ with Gulf War comments

Mr Johnson told the inquiry that he only got a “proper” paper on long Covid in the summer of 2021.

Mr Keith told the inquiry that Mr Johnson “continued to make disparaging references to whether or not this is Gulf War syndrome stuff” in February 2021, and again in June 2021.

The inquiry has also previously been shown a WhatsApp message from February 2021, where Mr Johnson said: “Do we really believe in long Covid? Why can’t we hedge it more? I bet it’s complete Gulf War Syndrome stuff.”

Mr Johnson told the hearing: “It’s no disrespect to long Covid patients and I saw in the victim impact videos are some of the victims of long Covid, I can imagine what a dreadful thing is.

“But there are also, with Gulf War syndrome, many people who have terrible symptoms for a very long time.

“There are also people who think they may be suffering, I think this is the now accepted, from something associated with the Gulf War, but who are not in fact suffering from something associated with the Gulf War.

“So what I was trying to say was ‘where is the, where is the line’? And ‘please can someone explain to me what this is?’

“Because I was getting anecdotal accounts of people who were suffering from it, and I wanted to be able to say what we understood it to be and what we were doing about it.

“And what we were doing about it is fighting Covid, because the way to stop long Covid is to, is to stop Covid.”

Sam Rkaina7 December 2023 02:00
1701910800

Boris Johnson ‘regrets’ long Covid remarks

Boris Johnson has said he “regrets” describing long Covid as “bollocks”.

But charities representing people with the condition said the former prime minister “only apologised because he got found out”.

The UK Covid-19 Inquiry heard that Mr Johnson made a number of “disparaging” remarks about the condition during his time in office.

A document from October 2020 described symptoms of the condition, beside which he wrote “bollocks” and “this is Gulf War Syndrome”.

Counsel to the inquiry, Hugo Keith KC, said: “You were I think less sympathetic to the needs of those persons suffering from long-term sequela, that is to say, suffering from the condition (known) as long Covid.

“You questioned for quite some time whether or not that condition truly existed and you equated it to Gulf War syndrome repeatedly, is that fair?”

Mr Johnson replied: “Not really, no.

“The words that I scribbled in the margins of submissions about long Covid have obviously been now publicised and I’m sure that they have caused hurt and offence to the huge numbers of people who do indeed suffer from that syndrome.

“And I regret very much using that language and I should have thought about the possibility of future publication.”

<p>Boris Johnson during a visit to a hospital during the pandemic   </p>

Boris Johnson during a visit to a hospital during the pandemic

Sam Rkaina7 December 2023 01:00
1701907192

Families demand answers from former PM

Mert Dogus, 21, whose father died of Covid, said Mr Johnson “should be giving answers for some of his actions” at the Covid inquiry.

His father, cab driver Haci Ali Dogus, 49, died in March 2020, leaving behind his wife and two sons.

In response to Mr Johnson’s apology for the “suffering of the Covid victims”, Mr Dogus, a student at Brunel University London, said “I’m not surprised, he kind of owes it.

“Obviously, he was in control of the country at the time, so naturally, he should be apologising for those who are lost.”

Mr Dogus said Mr Johnson “should be giving answers for some of his actions” and it is “good for us to see his reasoning behind” decisions that Mr Johnson’s government took during the Covid pandemic.

In response Mr Johnson said at the inquiry that he was “not sure” whether Government decision-making had led to “materially” a larger number of excess deaths as a result of the pandemic, Mr Dogus said: “He can’t really say that.”

He said: “Boris waited, and he waited and waited and then obviously it spread a lot more and then it turned into this huge thing.”

“If you caught it whilst it was early, I think it wouldn’t have been as bad.”

Mr Dogus added that prohibited gatherings by Mr Johnson and government and Conservative Party staff during the Covid-19 pandemic was “a slap in the face to all of us, who have obviously lost members of our families”.

Sam Rkaina6 December 2023 23:59
1701903652

Bereaved family members call Johnson’s apology at Covid inquiry ‘meaningless’

Family members of people who died during the pandemic have criticised Boris Johnson after he admitted his government “underestimated” the threat of coronavirus.

Appearing at the Covid-19 Inquiry in London on Wednesday, Mr Johnson apologised for “the pain and the loss and the suffering of the Covid victims” but said he was “not sure” whether Government decision-making had led to “materially” a larger number of excess deaths.

Jane Basham, 61, whose sister Sandra died in January 2021 after contracting coronavirus, branded Mr Johnson’s apology “meaningless”, adding she held him responsible for her sibling’s death aged 61.

Sandra Basham had been caring for older people in their homes near Dartford, Kent, during the pandemic before she was admitted to hospital, with Ms Basham adding her family did not see her because they were taking the virus seriously.

Ms Basham, of Ipswich, Suffolk, said: “His apology is meaningless to me, and many of us who are bereaved.

“If Boris Johnson was truly sorry then he would have delivered a public inquiry when it was first requested and not forced a group of traumatised bereaved relatives to have to fight for it.

“He would have shown humility and met the bereaved families who stand outside the inquiry every day rather than scuttling in before dawn.”

<p>Jane Basham with sister Sandra</p>

Jane Basham with sister Sandra

Sam Rkaina6 December 2023 23:00
1701900035

In pictures: Protesters outside Covid inquiry on first day of Johnson’s evidence

<p>People hold placards as they protest outside the Covid Inquiry during the testimony by Boris Johnson on Wednesday </p>

People hold placards as they protest outside the Covid Inquiry during the testimony by Boris Johnson on Wednesday

<p>A van displaying a protest banner is parked outside the Covid-19 Inquiry in London on Wednesday</p>

A van displaying a protest banner is parked outside the Covid-19 Inquiry in London on Wednesday

<p>People hold banners as they protest after the arrival of Boris Johnson at the Covid Inquiry on Wednesday </p>

People hold banners as they protest after the arrival of Boris Johnson at the Covid Inquiry on Wednesday

Tara Cobham6 December 2023 22:00

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiZGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmluZGVwZW5kZW50LmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWsvaG9tZS1uZXdzL2JvcmlzLWpvaG5zb24tY292aWQtaW5xdWlyeS1saXZlLXRvZGF5LWIyNDU5OTE2Lmh0bWzSAQA?oc=5

2023-12-07 07:00:00Z
CBMiZGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmluZGVwZW5kZW50LmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWsvaG9tZS1uZXdzL2JvcmlzLWpvaG5zb24tY292aWQtaW5xdWlyeS1saXZlLXRvZGF5LWIyNDU5OTE2Lmh0bWzSAQA

Chris Mason: Mood in Conservative Party bleak after Jenrick's resignation - BBC

Rishi SunakGetty Images

Rishi Sunak is seeking a route to Rwanda for migrants that is legally, practically and politically navigable.

Legally, because he has to find a way to address the concerns of the Supreme Court, who said his earlier plan was unlawful.

Practically, because he wants migrants on planes to Rwanda before the general election.

And politically because he has to simultaneously persuade those broadly on the left of his party who fret about any ideas they might regard as extreme and those on the right who fret he doesn't have the stomach to go far enough.

And the blunt truth is we now know his now former immigration minister, Robert Jenrick, thinks he's destined to fail, again. He had been talking to the prime minister for around a week about his concerns - and now he has resigned.

This matters because cutting illegal immigration matters to hundreds of Conservative MPs and millions of voters.

It matters, too, because having been a cork on Conservative chaos for much of his year and a bit as prime minister - in contrast to what came immediately before under Liz Truss and Boris Johnson - a moment like this has the potential to send that cork whizzing over the No10 garden wall.

Senior figures are musing privately that they wouldn't be surprised if Mr Sunak ended up facing a confidence vote from his own MPs.

"Lots of MPs are concerned about their seats and the polls, and they're rapidly forming the view the current management is not performing and will not deliver an election win," one senior Tory MP said.

"The danger is we get a confidence vote by accident because if one MP says 'I'm putting my letter in' others do too'."

The MP added: "I just want him to do better and listen to us. I actually want him to win the next general election, but frankly to please both wings of the party on an issue like this is impossible, and that's where leadership is important."

Another told me: "Rishi wouldn't lose a confidence vote. But I wouldn't be surprised if he faced one."

Robert Jenrick
EPA

A recurring theme from many Conservative MPs in private is a fear the leadership lacks a coherent strategy.

And all this in the very week the government was trying to make the case it was making progress on migration.

Sources would whisper that gone were the fireworks of Suella Braverman - the former home secretary - and now came the action.

And yet at the very moment the current Home Secretary James Cleverly was in Kigali, rebooting the government's plan to send some migrants to Rwanda, Mr Jenrick was telling the prime minister why it wouldn't work.

So, what happens next? Does Mr Jenrick's resignation galvanise a wider revolt that spins away into something perilous for the prime minister? After all, he was the in-house expert on immigration who has left because he reckons the new Rwanda plan is hopeless.

Or do Conservative MPs conclude yet another blast of the collywobbles would be unforgivably indulgent?

Excitable chatter is the currency of exchange at Westminster and the chatter about confidence votes and the like might not come to anything.

But the chatter is a measure of the mood among many Conservatives.

And the mood is bleak.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTY3NjQ0OTUy0gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNjc2NDQ5NTIuYW1w?oc=5

2023-12-07 01:22:43Z
CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTY3NjQ0OTUy0gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNjc2NDQ5NTIuYW1w

Boris Johnson Covid Inquiry LIVE: Ex-PM to face second day's grilling - The Independent

Boris Johnson denies deleting Whatsapp messages ahead of Covid inquiry

Boris Johnson is to face a second day of grilling at the covid inquiry on Thursday.

The former prime minister will return to the hearing having been booed by crowds of bereaved families on Wednesday.

During his first day of testimony, Mr Johnson’s apology to the nation was interrupted by four people who staged a protest in the hearing room.

Mr Johnson arrived three hours early on Wednesday morning to dodge the protesters waiting outside. During the day he admitted the pandemic’s impact on the NHS had “bewildered” him. He also acknowledged the government’s policy appeared “incoherent” on the timing of actions in light of the graph in March 2020 suggesting the NHS could be overwhelmed.

Mr Johnson stumbled over his words as the inquiry heard he lost 5,000 WhatsApp messages between January 2020 and June 2020.

He also implied the mad cow disease crisis in Britain made him sceptical of the threat of coronavirus as it “wasn’t nearly as fatal as people had originally believed”.

1701914400

Mr Johnson ‘meant no disrespect’ with Gulf War comments

Mr Johnson told the inquiry that he only got a “proper” paper on long Covid in the summer of 2021.

Mr Keith told the inquiry that Mr Johnson “continued to make disparaging references to whether or not this is Gulf War syndrome stuff” in February 2021, and again in June 2021.

The inquiry has also previously been shown a WhatsApp message from February 2021, where Mr Johnson said: “Do we really believe in long Covid? Why can’t we hedge it more? I bet it’s complete Gulf War Syndrome stuff.”

Mr Johnson told the hearing: “It’s no disrespect to long Covid patients and I saw in the victim impact videos are some of the victims of long Covid, I can imagine what a dreadful thing is.

“But there are also, with Gulf War syndrome, many people who have terrible symptoms for a very long time.

“There are also people who think they may be suffering, I think this is the now accepted, from something associated with the Gulf War, but who are not in fact suffering from something associated with the Gulf War.

“So what I was trying to say was ‘where is the, where is the line’? And ‘please can someone explain to me what this is?’

“Because I was getting anecdotal accounts of people who were suffering from it, and I wanted to be able to say what we understood it to be and what we were doing about it.

“And what we were doing about it is fighting Covid, because the way to stop long Covid is to, is to stop Covid.”

Sam Rkaina7 December 2023 02:00
1701910800

Boris Johnson ‘regrets’ long Covid remarks

Boris Johnson has said he “regrets” describing long Covid as “bollocks”.

But charities representing people with the condition said the former prime minister “only apologised because he got found out”.

The UK Covid-19 Inquiry heard that Mr Johnson made a number of “disparaging” remarks about the condition during his time in office.

A document from October 2020 described symptoms of the condition, beside which he wrote “bollocks” and “this is Gulf War Syndrome”.

Counsel to the inquiry, Hugo Keith KC, said: “You were I think less sympathetic to the needs of those persons suffering from long-term sequela, that is to say, suffering from the condition (known) as long Covid.

“You questioned for quite some time whether or not that condition truly existed and you equated it to Gulf War syndrome repeatedly, is that fair?”

Mr Johnson replied: “Not really, no.

“The words that I scribbled in the margins of submissions about long Covid have obviously been now publicised and I’m sure that they have caused hurt and offence to the huge numbers of people who do indeed suffer from that syndrome.

“And I regret very much using that language and I should have thought about the possibility of future publication.”

<p>Boris Johnson during a visit to a hospital during the pandemic   </p>

Boris Johnson during a visit to a hospital during the pandemic

Sam Rkaina7 December 2023 01:00
1701907192

Families demand answers from former PM

Mert Dogus, 21, whose father died of Covid, said Mr Johnson “should be giving answers for some of his actions” at the Covid inquiry.

His father, cab driver Haci Ali Dogus, 49, died in March 2020, leaving behind his wife and two sons.

In response to Mr Johnson’s apology for the “suffering of the Covid victims”, Mr Dogus, a student at Brunel University London, said “I’m not surprised, he kind of owes it.

“Obviously, he was in control of the country at the time, so naturally, he should be apologising for those who are lost.”

Mr Dogus said Mr Johnson “should be giving answers for some of his actions” and it is “good for us to see his reasoning behind” decisions that Mr Johnson’s government took during the Covid pandemic.

In response Mr Johnson said at the inquiry that he was “not sure” whether Government decision-making had led to “materially” a larger number of excess deaths as a result of the pandemic, Mr Dogus said: “He can’t really say that.”

He said: “Boris waited, and he waited and waited and then obviously it spread a lot more and then it turned into this huge thing.”

“If you caught it whilst it was early, I think it wouldn’t have been as bad.”

Mr Dogus added that prohibited gatherings by Mr Johnson and government and Conservative Party staff during the Covid-19 pandemic was “a slap in the face to all of us, who have obviously lost members of our families”.

Sam Rkaina6 December 2023 23:59
1701903652

Bereaved family members call Johnson’s apology at Covid inquiry ‘meaningless’

Family members of people who died during the pandemic have criticised Boris Johnson after he admitted his government “underestimated” the threat of coronavirus.

Appearing at the Covid-19 Inquiry in London on Wednesday, Mr Johnson apologised for “the pain and the loss and the suffering of the Covid victims” but said he was “not sure” whether Government decision-making had led to “materially” a larger number of excess deaths.

Jane Basham, 61, whose sister Sandra died in January 2021 after contracting coronavirus, branded Mr Johnson’s apology “meaningless”, adding she held him responsible for her sibling’s death aged 61.

Sandra Basham had been caring for older people in their homes near Dartford, Kent, during the pandemic before she was admitted to hospital, with Ms Basham adding her family did not see her because they were taking the virus seriously.

Ms Basham, of Ipswich, Suffolk, said: “His apology is meaningless to me, and many of us who are bereaved.

“If Boris Johnson was truly sorry then he would have delivered a public inquiry when it was first requested and not forced a group of traumatised bereaved relatives to have to fight for it.

“He would have shown humility and met the bereaved families who stand outside the inquiry every day rather than scuttling in before dawn.”

<p>Jane Basham with sister Sandra</p>

Jane Basham with sister Sandra

Sam Rkaina6 December 2023 23:00
1701900035

In pictures: Protesters outside Covid inquiry on first day of Johnson’s evidence

<p>People hold placards as they protest outside the Covid Inquiry during the testimony by Boris Johnson on Wednesday </p>

People hold placards as they protest outside the Covid Inquiry during the testimony by Boris Johnson on Wednesday

<p>A van displaying a protest banner is parked outside the Covid-19 Inquiry in London on Wednesday</p>

A van displaying a protest banner is parked outside the Covid-19 Inquiry in London on Wednesday

<p>People hold banners as they protest after the arrival of Boris Johnson at the Covid Inquiry on Wednesday </p>

People hold banners as they protest after the arrival of Boris Johnson at the Covid Inquiry on Wednesday

Tara Cobham6 December 2023 22:00
1701898235

Watch: Boris Johnson chokes up speaking about Covid in 2020

Boris Johnson chokes up speaking about Covid in 2020
Tara Cobham6 December 2023 21:30
1701896435

Boris Johnson: Where is he now and is he still MP?

Speaking outside Downing Street at the time before stepping down as PM, Mr Johnson thanked those who voted Conservative and said the reason he fought so long to remain in office was because he thought it was “my job, my duty and my obligation to you”.

Faiza Saqib reports:

Tara Cobham6 December 2023 21:00
1701894635

The key takeaways from Boris Johnson at the covid inquiry

But, while his first evidence session saw less mud-slinging than others’, notably Dominic Cummings, there have still been several striking revelations.

Archie Mitchell reports:

Tara Cobham6 December 2023 20:30
1701892835

Johnson on Manchester ‘treated differently’ to Liverpool

Boris Johnson was told that one of Sir Patrick Vallance’s diary entries suggested that in relation to Manchester and Andy Burnham, a Covid-S meeting drew a distinction between the support and measures for Manchester as opposed to Liverpool for “nakedly political reasons”.

It was put by Hugo Keith KC that on the local leadership a “view was taken about how cooperative it was being” and Manchester would be “treated differently” to Liverpool.

Mr Johnson said: “I don’t remember that at all. I think that Liverpool, certainly the people were heroic in trying to get mass testing going. And again, there was terrific hardship because of the lockdowns, but they were vital to the campaign to get mass testing going.”

Tara Cobham6 December 2023 20:00
1701891035

Johnson calls for changes in way decisions are made at heart of government

Boris Johnson earlier called for changes in the way decisions are made at the heart of government.

He told the inquiry: “What I would submit is that, for future pandemics, there needs to be more clarity about which are the debating, the discussion meetings and which are the decision-making meetings.

“What would happen is that I would be presented with a problem and then within the space of half an hour, we would have got to the solution. And then we’d have to do it all again in a separate format or through the Cabinet or whatever.”

The former prime minister told the inquiry: “To be absolutely frank, I don’t think if I was sitting in a Covid O (operations) or Covid S (strategy) I could have told you at any given moment whether it was a Covid 0 or a Covid S, I was just sitting in meeting after meeting, trying to deal with the problem.

“That was the most effective way to do it. You needed to be sitting permanently on the bridge, trying to deal with it all.”

<p>Former prime minister Boris Johnson giving evidence to the UK Covid-19 Inquiry</p>

Former prime minister Boris Johnson giving evidence to the UK Covid-19 Inquiry

Tara Cobham6 December 2023 19:30

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiZGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmluZGVwZW5kZW50LmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWsvaG9tZS1uZXdzL2JvcmlzLWpvaG5zb24tY292aWQtaW5xdWlyeS10b2RheS1saXZlLWIyNDU5MjI3Lmh0bWzSAQA?oc=5

2023-12-07 01:00:00Z
CBMiZGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmluZGVwZW5kZW50LmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWsvaG9tZS1uZXdzL2JvcmlzLWpvaG5zb24tY292aWQtaW5xdWlyeS10b2RheS1saXZlLWIyNDU5MjI3Lmh0bWzSAQA

Robert Jenrick resigns as immigration minister over Rwanda legislation - BBC

Robert JenrickEPA

Robert Jenrick has resigned as immigration minister, saying the government's emergency Rwanda legislation "does not go far enough".

He said "stronger protections" were needed to end "the merry-go-round of legal challenges which risk paralysing the scheme".

The government said the bill, unveiled earlier, made clear in UK law Rwanda was a safe country for asylum seekers.

But it stops short of what some on the Tory right were demanding.

In his resignation letter to Rishi Sunak, Mr Jenrick said the prime minister had "moved towards my position" on the emergency legislation.

"Nevertheless, I am unable to take the currently proposed legislation through the Commons as I do not believe it provides us with the best possible chance of success."

Mr Jenrick added that the bill was "a triumph of hope over experience".

In response, the prime minister described Mr Jenrick's resignation as "disappointing" and "based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the situation".

"If we were to oust the courts entirely, we would collapse the entire scheme," Mr Sunak said.

"The Rwandan government have been clear that they would not accept the UK basing this scheme on legislation that could be considered in breach of our international law obligations."

The plans to send some asylum seekers to Rwanda aim to deter people from crossing the English Channel in small boats.

But the scheme has been repeatedly delayed by legal challenges and no asylum seekers have been sent to the east African country from the UK so far.

Mr Jenrick, who had supported Mr Sunak's leadership campaign, said the emergency legislation was the "last opportunity" to prove the government would do "whatever it takes" to stop small boat crossings.

Losing a minister who was once a key ally is a blow for Mr Sunak, in a week when the government had been trying to get on the front foot on migration.

Labour's shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper said: "It is a sign of the total chaos in the Tory party and the complete collapse of Rishi Sunak's leadership that even while he is sitting in the Commons for the announcement of his new Rwanda plan, his own immigration minister is resigning because he doesn't think it will work."

Senior figures are musing privately that they would not be surprised if Mr Sunak ended up facing a confidence vote from his own MPs.

Although it may not come to that, it is a measure of the bleak mood among many Conservatives.

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Reports of Mr Jenrick's resignation first started swirling after the government published the draft bill.

The legislation aims to address the concerns of the UK's Supreme Court, which last month ruled plans to send some asylum seekers to Rwanda were unlawful.

The bill - which must be approved by Parliament - orders the courts to ignore key sections of the Human Rights Act in an attempt to sidestep the Supreme Court's existing judgement.

It also orders the courts to ignore other British laws or international rules - such as the international Refugee Convention - that stand in the way of deportations to Rwanda.

However, it does not go as far as some Tory MPs wanted.

Former Home Secretary Suella Braverman and her supporters had called for it to override the entire Human Rights Act, the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), the Refugee Convention, and all other international law.

The bill allows ministers to ignore any emergency order from the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg to temporarily halt a flight to Rwanda while an individual case is still being considered.

But it stops short of providing powers to dismiss the whole of the ECHR.

It also allows migrants to legally challenge their removal to Rwanda on specific individual grounds, if they can prove that being put on a plane would leave them at real risk of serious harm.

A source close to Mrs Braverman said the bill was "fatally flawed" and would be "bogged down in the courts for months and months".

However, if the government had agreed to her demands this would have provoked a backlash from centrist Tories.

The One Nation group, which is made up of more than 100 Tory MPs, had warned that overriding the ECHR was a "red line" for a number of Conservatives.

The group cautiously welcomed "the government's decision to continue to meet the UK's international commitments which uphold the rule of law" but added that it would seek legal advice "about concerns and the practicalities of the bill".

The draft legislation concedes that it may not be compatible with the ECHR.

This means government lawyers have told ministers the measures could still be legally challenged.

line

Who is Robert Jenrick?

The former solicitor became a Conservative MP when he was elected in the 2014 by-election in the Nottinghamshire seat of Newark.

He was promoted into the cabinet as housing secretary in 2019 by then-Prime Minister Boris Johnson.

Mr Jenrick, a 41-year-old father-of-three, also briefly served as a junior health minister in Liz Truss's government, despite backing Mr Sunak for the Tory leadership.

As immigration minister he consistently pushed for a harder line on legal and illegal immigration, expressing frustration at the high levels of both.

He was also at the centre of several controversies, including a row over approving planning permission for Tory donor Richard Desmond.

line

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTY3NjQwODMz0gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNjc2NDA4MzMuYW1w?oc=5

2023-12-06 23:40:00Z
CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTY3NjQwODMz0gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNjc2NDA4MzMuYW1w

Robert Jenrick resigns as immigration minister over Rwanda legislation - BBC

Robert JenrickEPA

Robert Jenrick has resigned as immigration minister, saying the government's emergency Rwanda legislation "does not go far enough".

He said "stronger protections" were needed to end "the merry-go-round of legal challenges which risk paralysing the scheme".

The government said the bill, unveiled earlier, made clear in UK law Rwanda was a safe country for asylum seekers.

But it stops short of what some on the Tory right were demanding.

In his resignation letter to the prime minister, Mr Jenrick said: "In our discussions on the proposed emergency legislation you have moved towards my position, for which I am grateful.

"Nevertheless, I am unable to take the currently proposed legislation through the Commons as I do not believe it provides us with the best possible chance of success."

He added that the bill was "a triumph of hope over experience".

In his reply to the letter, the prime minister said Mr Jenrick's resignation was "disappointing given we both agree on the ends, getting flights off to Rwanda so that we can stop the boats".

Rishi Sunak said he was confident his Rwanda plan would work, adding: "I fear that your departure is based on a fundamental misunderstanding of the situation

"If we were to oust the courts entirely, we would collapse the entire scheme.

"The Rwandan government have been clear that they would not accept the UK basing this scheme on legislation that could be considered in breach of our international law obligations."

The plans to send some asylum seekers to Rwanda aim to deter people from crossing the English Channel in small boats.

But the scheme has been repeatedly delayed by legal challenges and no asylum seekers have been sent to the east African country from the UK so far.

Mr Jenrick said the emergency legislation was the "last opportunity" to prove the government would do "whatever it takes" to stop small boat crossings.

"But in its current drafting it does not go far enough," he said.

He added: "I refuse to be yet another politician who makes promises on immigration to the British public but does not keep them."

Mr Jenrick, who had supported Mr Sunak's leadership campaign, did not criticise the prime minister personally and praised him for stabilising the country "against strong headwinds".

He added that the PM "will retain my full support on the backbenches".

Losing a minister who was once a key ally is a blow for Mr Sunak, in a week when the government had been trying to get on the front foot on migration.

Labour's shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper said: "It is a sign of the total chaos in the Tory party and the complete collapse of Rishi Sunak's leadership that even while he is sitting in the Commons for the announcement of his new Rwanda plan, his own immigration minister is resigning because he doesn't think it will work."

Senior figures are musing privately that they would not be surprised if Mr Sunak ended up facing a confidence vote from his own MPs.

Although it may not come to that, it is a measure of the bleak mood among many Conservatives.

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Reports of Mr Jenrick's resignation started swirling after the government published the draft bill.

The legislation aims to address the concerns of the Supreme Court, which last month ruled plans to send some asylum seekers to Rwanda were unlawful.

The bill, which must be voted on by Parliament, orders the courts to ignore key sections of the Human Rights Act in an attempt to sidestep the Supreme Court's existing judgement.

It also orders the courts to ignore other British laws or international rules - such as the international Refugee Convention - that stand in the way of deportations to Rwanda.

However, it does not go as far as some Tory MPs wanted.

Former Home Secretary Suella Braverman and her supporters had called for it to override the entire Human Rights Act, the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), the Refugee Convention, and all other international law.

Mr Jenrick had been an ally of Mrs Braverman when she was in government.

The bill allows ministers to ignore any emergency order from the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg to temporarily halt a flight to Rwanda while an individual case is still being considered.

But it stops short of providing powers to dismiss the whole of the ECHR.

It also allows migrants to legally challenge their removal to Rwanda on specific individual grounds, if they can prove that being put on a plane would leave them at real risk of serious harm.

A source close to Mrs Braverman said the bill was "fatally flawed" and would be "bogged down in the courts for months and months".

However, if the government had agreed to her demands this would have provoked a backlash from centrist Tories.

The One Nation group, which is made up of more than 100 Tory MPs, had warned that overriding the ECHR was a "red line" for a number of Conservatives.

The group cautiously welcomed "the government's decision to continue to meet the UK's international commitments which uphold the rule of law".

But it added that it would be seeking legal advice "about concerns and the practicalities of the bill".

The draft legislation concedes that it may not be compatible with the ECHR.

This means government lawyers have told ministers the measures could still be legally challenged.

line

Who is Robert Jenrick?

Mr Jenrick was a solicitor before he became the Conservative MP for Newark in 2014 in a by-election.

Boris Johnson promoted him to the cabinet as housing secretary in 2019.

The 41-year-old father-of-three briefly served as a junior health minister in Liz Truss's government, despite backing Mr Sunak for the Tory leadership.

As Mr Sunak's immigration minister he consistently pushed for a harder line on legal and illegal immigration, expressing frustration at the high levels of both.

He was at the centre of a number of controversies - including a row over approving planning permission for Tory donor Richard Desmond.

line

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTY3NjQwODMz0gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNjc2NDA4MzMuYW1w?oc=5

2023-12-06 21:47:30Z
CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTY3NjQwODMz0gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNjc2NDA4MzMuYW1w