Jumat, 10 November 2023

Suella Braverman 'stirring hatred and division' as Sunak urged to sack her - live - The Independent

Tory minister refuses multiple times to say PM has confidence in Suella Braverman

Suella Braverman has been accused of stirring “hatred and division” as Rishi Sunak faces calls to sack the home secretary over her incendiary claim that the police are biased.

Ms Braverman’s job is on the line after Downing Street made clear that it had not approved an extraordinary article in which she accused officers of playing favourites over a pro-Palestine march on Armistice Day.

No 10 says it is investigating after it demanded that changes be made to the piece but the request was ignored. As the home secretary’s claims sparked a furious outcry, one Conservative minister broke ranks to accuse her of fuelling “hatred and division”.

Meanwhile George Osborne, the former Tory chancellor, said the prime minister risked looking weak if he decided not to axe Ms Braverman.

1699620013

ICYMI: Top civil servant’s foul-mouthed attack on ‘lying’ Matt Hancock at Covid inquiry

Britain’s top civil servant launched a savage attack on Matt Hancock during the pandemic, telling Boris Johnson to sack the “lying” health secretary to “save lives and protect the NHS”, the Covid inquiry heard on Wednesday.

Archie Mitchell reports:

Matt Mathers10 November 2023 12:40
1699618813

Ex-Natwest boss Alison Rose stripped of £7.6m over Nigel Farage debanking row

NatWest has stripped its former boss Dame Alison Rose of £7.6 million in payouts after she was forced to resign over the Nigel Farage debanking row.

Archie Mitchell reports:

Matt Mathers10 November 2023 12:20
1699617389

Should Suella Braverman resign over pro-Palestine march row? Join The Independent Debate

Much has been said and written about Braverman’s incendiary claim in a recent newspaper article that the police are biased in how they deal with protests.

The remarks are the latest in a string of inflammatory comments made by the home secretary, a darling of the Tory right who is tipped as a future leader of the party.

Was Braverman simply stating her true beliefs in the comment piece, which also provoked outrage in Northern Ireland, or was she trying to get sacked so that she could launch a leadership campaign, eventually taking over from Rishi Sunak, should he lose the next election and resign as party leader.

What do you think? If you want to share your opinion then add it in the comments section in the article below and we’ll highlight the most insightful ones as they come in.

All you have to do is sign up and register your details - then you can then take part in the discussion. You can also sign up by clicking ‘log in’ on the top right-hand corner of the screen:

Matt Mathers10 November 2023 11:56
1699616833

Braverman spotted leaving home as she faces calls to resign

Under fire home secretary Suella Braverman was spotted leaving her home earlier this morning as she faced calls to resign.

The home secretary, dressed in a shirt and jacket, was seen smiling as she left her home in Hertfordshire, having spent Thursday at hospital with a family member who needed treatment.

Braverman left for work at around 10.15 and did not speak to reporters as she left.

Matt Mathers10 November 2023 11:47
1699616221

Tory peer Sayeeda Warsi calls for Suella to be sacked ‘again’

Conservative peer Sayeeda Warsi has called for Rishi Sunak to sack Suella Braverman “again” in the national interest, Archie Mitchell reports.

Baroness Warsi said Ms Braverman “needs to focus on her job not her personal political ambitions”.

“She was forced to leave for leaking sensitive documents and should never have been reappointed - she must now be sacked again,” the former Tory chairman added.

Mr Sunak sparked fury when he reappointed Ms Braverman as home secretary just days after she was forced to resign from Liz Truss’s government over a serious security breach.

Matt Mathers10 November 2023 11:37
1699615622

Right-wing Tories are rallying behind the home secretary

Right-wing Tories have rallied behind the home secretary, warning Rishi Sunak “if you come for her, you come for us”, Archie Mitchell reports.

Suella Braverman’s backers have reminded the prime minister she played a key role in his selection as Tory leader, claiming sacking her will “end very badly for him”.

And they have sought to downplay her remarks as in line with the views of the majority of the country.

Tory MP Miriam Cates mounted a defence of Ms Braverman, telling the BBC her view is “very mainstream in the rest of the UK”.

She said she would "completely disagree" that Ms Braverman was making matters worse with her commentary.

And Ms Cates said we are at a “very serious moment” in British history and instead of talking about Hamas’s terrorist attacks, “we seem to be talking about which version of an article No10 cleared”.

One right-wing Tory MP told the Daily Mail: “There was an operation by the whips to stoke anger against Suella.

“But a large group of MPs on the Right pushed back. The message was simple: ‘Don’t try it, she speaks for us. So if you come for her, you come for us.’”

Matt Mathers10 November 2023 11:27
1699615394

Royal British Legion backs pro-Palestine demonstrators’ right to protest amid march row

The RBL has urged protesters to be peaceful and show respect as mourners flock to London this weekend to remember our war dead.

Amy-Clare Martin reports:

Matt Mathers10 November 2023 11:23
1699614316

Suella Braverman must resign now

As we just reported, Dominic Grieve has written a comment piece for The Independent in which he heavily criticises Suella Braverman and calls for her to resign.

You can read the article in full here:

Suella Braverman must resign now - Dominic Grieve

The home secretary has undermined the independence of the police and weaponised Remembrance commemorations for her own political ends. She must not be allowed to represent us at the Cenotaph on Sunday, writes former attorney general Dominic Grieve

Matt Mathers10 November 2023 11:05
1699613413

Braverman ‘weaponised’ Rememberance Day commemorations for ‘own political ends'

Suella Braverman “weaponised” Remembrance Day commemorations for her “own political ends” and should resign, a former attorney general has said.

Dominic Grieve, the former MP for Beaconsfield, said the home secretary, should not be allowed to “represent us at the Cenotaph on Sunday

In a comment piece for The Independent, Grieve wrote: “This attempted weaponisation shows Braverman to not only be lacking in any understanding of her office or of what freedom under law is about, but to be positively dangerous to the development of common good in our society.

“She is inciting division herself and not acting to calm and curb intemperance and excess, or to modify, by debate, opinions with which she may properly disagree.

“She has sought to create a false narrative that lawfully demonstrating in a march on Armistice Day, about the war in Gaza, is in itself incompatible with being British and part of the collective national remembrance of our war dead.”

Matt Mathers10 November 2023 10:50
1699612513

Sunak ‘too weak’ to sack Braverman - Reeves

Rishi Sunak is “too weak” to sack Suella Braverman, Labour’s Rachel Reeves has said.

The shadow chancellor described the home secretary’s comments in a recent newspaper article as “reckless and irresponsible”.

“At a time when the government should be working with our police force, the home secretary is undermining them, and when we should be trying to bring communities together Suella Braverman is dividing them.

“And the prime minister seems to be too weak to take the decisive action that is now needed.”

<p>FIle photo: Rachel Reeves </p>

FIle photo: Rachel Reeves

Matt Mathers10 November 2023 10:35

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMic2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmluZGVwZW5kZW50LmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWsvcG9saXRpY3MvcHJvLXBhbGVzdGluZS1wcm90ZXN0LXJlbWVtYnJhbmNlLWRheS1icmF2ZXJtYW4tbG9uZG9uLWIyNDQ1MDE5Lmh0bWzSAQA?oc=5

2023-11-10 12:20:13Z
2558083671

Suella Braverman: Jeremy Hunt refuses to back protest claims - BBC

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Chancellor Jeremy Hunt has refused to back Suella Braverman's claims about police bias, as Prime Minister Rishi Sunak faces calls to sack her.

Mr Hunt said the home secretary's comments in a Times article "are not words that I myself would have used".

But he added "the prime minister has said he has full confidence in her".

She claimed aggressive right-wing protesters were "rightly met with a stern response", while "pro-Palestinian mobs" were "largely ignored".

The home secretary defied a Downing Street request to tone down the article, which was published in the Times on Wednesday.

Mr Hunt said although he would not use her words, "I have a productive relationship with her as a colleague" and had "always given her the money that she needs to fund the police".

The Liberal Democrats, the SNP and some Conservative MPs have called for her removal from office over the article, in which Ms Braverman claimed police were applying "double standards" and "played favourites when it comes to demonstrators".

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer has accused Mrs Braverman of undermining the police and said Rishi Sunak was "too weak to do anything about it".

But Mrs Braverman's allies on the right of the party have rallied behind her, with the deputy chairman of the Conservative Party, Lee Anderson, tweeting to say the home secretary was "guilty of saying what most of us are thinking".

Mrs Braverman's article was published following an announcement by the Metropolitan Police chief, Sir Mark Rowley, that he did not have grounds to ban a pro-Palestinian march due to take place on Armistice Day.

Downing Street say they are still looking into how the article came to be published without the changes they had requested.

A decision on Ms Braverman's future is unlikely to be made ahead of the pro-Palestinian protest march and Armistice Day on Saturday.

As home secretary, Mrs Braverman is responsible for the government department overseeing law and order.

But her critics feel she crossed a line by questioning the integrity of the police, whose independence to enforce laws is considered an important principle.

One of the UK's most senior police officers has suggested policing could be undermined if "public debate" influences decision making.

Home Secretary Suella Braverman attending a county lines raid with officers from West Midlands Police in Coventry
PA Media

Conservative MP Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown told the BBC it was "unwise" for the home secretary to write a Times article setting out her views on the protests.

Sir Geoffrey said it would be up to Mr Sunak whether to reshuffle his cabinet, but added "I think we cannot carry on as we are".

One ally of Mrs Braverman, Miriam Cates MP, disagreed with Sir Geoffrey and accused protesters of being responsible for "stirring up tensions".

Ms Cates said the home secretary has a view which is very "mainstream in the rest of the UK" and "should be allowed to get on with her job in the way she chooses to do it".

The political row comes just days before Mrs Braverman finds out whether the government's flagship Rwanda plan for migrants can go ahead.

On Wednesday the Supreme Court will decide whether to back the Court of Appeal's ruling in June that the policy is unlawful.

Mrs Braverman's article in the Times on Thursday was not cleared by Downing Street and it also emerged No 10's suggested changes to the text were not followed.

The Times reported on Friday that changes made at the request of No 10 included removing a warning to the police not to take a "soft touch" approach at the Armistice Day protest, along with claims there was "ample evidence" senior police officers were biased.

The paper reported further requested changes, including suggestions that she remove a comparison to marches in Northern Ireland, were rejected by Ms Braverman.

One ally of Ms Braverman told BBC Newsnight's Nick Watt that her "commitment to profound beliefs comes before calculation".

"Unless the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Guardian, the BBC and most of the commentariat are up in arms about Suella Braverman then she's not doing her job properly," he added citing a source close to the home secretary.

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

The Metropolitan Police has said it expects a large rally on Saturday, sparking fears of violent clashes with counter-protesters.

Saturday is also Armistice Day, the anniversary of the end of World War One, which has prompted calls from the prime minister and others for the pro-Palestine march to be cancelled, on the grounds that it is "disrespectful".

Met Police commissioner Sir Mark Rowley said protests may only be stopped if there is a threat of serious disorder, and that the "very high threshold" has not been reached.

In her Times article, Mrs Braverman claimed there was "a perception that senior officers play favourites when it comes to protesters".

Former Met Police Ch Supt Dal Babu noted the previous large-scale protests in central London in recent weeks have passed without public disorder.

He told BBC Breakfast the situation involving Mrs Braverman is "very troubling". "Normally these conversations would be held behind closed doors," he said.

"The danger with the kind of language the home secretary has used - she talks about hate marches and she has been very derogatory about policing - is it will make far right groups more bold and possibly come out when there was no intention to do so.

"This is unprecedented and I hope people will use calm heads and calm voices to not to stoke up any potential disorder."

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTY3Mzc2OTk20gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNjczNzY5OTYuYW1w?oc=5

2023-11-10 10:41:19Z
2558083671

Prince Harry wins bid for privacy trial against Daily Mail publisher - Sky News

Prince Harry and stars including Sir Elton John and Liz Hurley have won their bid to take the publisher of the Daily Mail to trial over alleged phone-tapping and other breaches of privacy.

Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL) stood accused of carrying out or commissioning unlawful information gathering, such as hiring private investigators to placing listening devices inside cars, "blagging" private records, and accessing and recording private phone conversations.

The publisher "firmly" denied the allegations. At a preliminary hearing in March, its legal team asked Mr Justice Nicklin to rule in its favour without a trial, arguing the legal challenge had been brought "far too late".

But in a ruling on Friday, Mr Justice Nicklin said ANL had "not been able to deliver a 'knockout blow' to the claims of any of these claimants".

In his 95-page judgment, he said each of the seven people have a "real prospect" of demonstrating ANL concealed "relevant facts" that would have allowed them to bring a claim against the publisher earlier.

"What was deliberately hidden from the claimants - if they are correct in their allegations - were the underlying unlawful acts that are alleged to have been used to obtain information for subsequent publication," he added.

Actor Hugh Grant, who is a board director for Hacked Off, a press reform campaign group, described the ruling as a "significant blow to the Daily Mail".

He added it is "great news" for anyone who "wants the truth about allegations of illegal press practices to come out".

Elton John is among those making a claim
Image: Elton John is among those making a claim

Harry brought the privacy case along with six others, including Sir Elton's husband David Furnish, actress and designer Sadie Frost, Baroness Doreen Lawrence, and former Liberal Democrat MP Sir Simon Hughes.

The royal made an appearance at the Royal Courts of Justice during the four-day hearing in March, with Sir Elton, Ms Frost and Lady Lawrence also attending at times.

What's alleged?

Lawyers for the claimants have said they had become aware of "highly distressing" evidence revealing they had been victims of "abhorrent criminal activity" and "gross breaches of privacy" by Associated Newspapers.

Accusations include:

• The hiring of private investigators to secretly place listening devices inside people's cars and homes;

• The commissioning of individuals to surreptitiously listen into and record people's live, private telephone calls while they were taking place;

• The impersonation of individuals to obtain medical information from private hospitals, clinics, and treatment centres by deception;

• Paying police officials, with corrupt links to private investigators, for sensitive information;

• Accessing bank accounts and financial transactions.

The latest move in Harry's crusade against tabloids

This is another significant step for Prince Harry’s crusade against the press.

And yes, we’ve been here before. Back in June, the Duke of Sussex made history when he appeared in the witness box in his case against the publishers of the Mirror.

But Harry’s made it clear he wants to take on all the tabloids, and this case is another chapter.

The allegations against Associated Newspapers Ltd echo those we’ve heard before: phone hacking and blagging – obtaining information by deceit.

We don’t yet know the full details, but those bringing the allegations all say they suffered “distress and harm”.

And Harry isn’t the only claimant; the case also involves Sir Elton John and his husband David Furnish, as well as Liz Hurley, Sadie Frost, the former politician Sir Simon Hughes and Baroness Lawrence, the mother of murdered teenager Stephen Lawrence.

Perhaps Doreen Lawrence’s allegations could be most significant. She is suing the very newspapers that so publicly backed her campaign for justice.

'Preposterous smears'

ANL has described the allegations as "preposterous smears", and claimed legal action taken is "a fishing expedition by [the] claimants and their lawyers".

Adrian Beltrami KC, for ANL, said the legal action against it had "no real prospects of succeeding" and was "barred" under a legal period of limitation.

Read more:
Harry v ANL: Everything you need to know about the court case
Harry says Royal Family 'without doubt' withheld information from him on phone hacking

Sadie Frost arriving at the Royal Courts Of Justice, central London, ahead of a hearing claim over allegations of unlawful information gathering brought against Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL) by seven people - the Duke of Sussex, Baroness Doreen Lawrence, Sir Elton John, David Furnish, Liz Hurley, Sadie Frost and Sir Simon Hughes. Picture date: Wednesday March 29, 2023.
Image: Sadie Frost arriving at the Royal Courts Of Justice earlier in 2023

He added the claimants could have used "reasonable diligence" to find out if they had a potential claim before October 2016.

Many of the claimants had brought legal action against other newspaper groups and hired lawyers involved in the Leveson Inquiry into press standards and phone hacking litigation, which took place in 2011 and 2012, as well as a "research team", the barrister said.

"It is inconceivable that what is claimed to be the key new information leading to each claimant realising they had a claim arrived unbidden in the past couple of years," Mr Beltrami said. "It must have been the product of a process, probably over a number of years."

However, lawyers for the claimants said they were "thrown off the scent", having believed "categorical denials" from ANL over any involvement in unlawful activity.

David Sherborne, representing Harry and others, described ANL's bid to end the claims as "ambitious as it is unattractive".

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiaGh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L3ByaW5jZS1oYXJyeS13aW5zLWJpZC1mb3ItcHJpdmFjeS10cmlhbC1hZ2FpbnN0LWRhaWx5LW1haWwtcHVibGlzaGVyLTEzMDA0MDMx0gFsaHR0cHM6Ly9uZXdzLnNreS5jb20vc3RvcnkvYW1wL3ByaW5jZS1oYXJyeS13aW5zLWJpZC1mb3ItcHJpdmFjeS10cmlhbC1hZ2FpbnN0LWRhaWx5LW1haWwtcHVibGlzaGVyLTEzMDA0MDMx?oc=5

2023-11-10 11:37:30Z
2590813376

Suella Braverman: Jeremy Hunt refuses to back protest claims - BBC

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Chancellor Jeremy Hunt has refused to back Suella Braverman's claims about police bias, as Prime Minister Rishi Sunak faces calls to sack her.

Mr Hunt said the home secretary's comments in a Times article "are not words that I myself would have used".

But he added "the prime minister has said he has full confidence in her".

She claimed aggressive right-wing protesters were "rightly met with a stern response", while "pro-Palestinian mobs" were "largely ignored".

The home secretary defied a Downing Street request to tone down the article, which was published in the Times on Wednesday.

Mr Hunt said although he would not use her words, "I have a productive relationship with her as a colleague" and had "always given her the money that she needs to fund the police".

The Liberal Democrats, the SNP and some Conservative MPs have called for her removal from office over the article, in which Ms Braverman claimed police were applying "double standards" and "played favourites when it comes to demonstrators".

But Ms Braverman's allies on the right of the party have rallied behind her, with the deputy chairman of the Conservative Party, Lee Anderson, tweeting to say the home secretary was "guilty of saying what most of us are thinking".

Ms Braverman's article was published following an announcement by the Metropolitan Police chief, Sir Mark Rowley, that he did not have grounds to ban a pro-Palestinian march due to take place on Armistice Day.

Downing Street say they are still looking into how the article came to be published without the changes they had requested.

A decision on Ms Braverman's future is unlikely to be made ahead of the pro-Palestinian protest march and Armistice Day on Saturday.

As home secretary, Ms Braverman is responsible for the government department overseeing law and order.

But her critics feel she crossed a line by questioning the integrity of the police, whose independence to enforce laws is considered an important principle.

One of the UK's most senior police officers has suggested policing could be undermined if "public debate" influences decision making.

Home Secretary Suella Braverman attending a county lines raid with officers from West Midlands Police in Coventry
PA Media

Conservative MP Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown told the BBC it was "unwise" for the home secretary to write a Times article setting out her views on the protests.

Sir Geoffrey said it would be up to Mr Sunak whether to reshuffle his cabinet, but added "I think we cannot carry on as we are".

One ally of Ms Braverman, Miriam Cates MP, disagreed with Sir Geoffrey and accused protesters of being responsible for "stirring up tensions".

Ms Cates said the home secretary has a view which is very "mainstream in the rest of the UK" and "should be allowed to get on with her job in the way she chooses to do it".

The political row comes just days before Mrs Braverman finds out whether the government's flagship Rwanda plan for migrants can go ahead.

On Wednesday the Supreme Court will decide whether to back the Court of Appeal's ruling in June that the policy is unlawful.

Ms Braverman's article in the Times on Thursday was not cleared by Downing Street and it also emerged No 10's suggested changes to the text were not followed.

The Times reported on Friday that changes made at the request of No 10 included removing a warning to the police not to take a "soft touch" approach at the Armistice Day protest, along with claims there was "ample evidence" senior police officers were biased.

The paper reported further requested changes, including suggestions that she remove a comparison to marches in Northern Ireland, were rejected by Ms Braverman.

One ally of Ms Braverman told BBC Newsnight's Nick Watt that her "commitment to profound beliefs comes before calculation".

"Unless the Archbishop of Canterbury, The Guardian, the BBC and most of the commentariat are up in arms about Suella Braverman then she's not doing her job properly," he added citing a source close to the home secretary.

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

The Metropolitan Police has said it expects a large rally on Saturday, sparking fears of violent clashes with counter-protesters.

Saturday is also Armistice Day, the anniversary of the end of World War One, which has prompted calls from the prime minister and others for the pro-Palestine march to be cancelled, on the grounds that it is "disrespectful".

Met Police commissioner Sir Mark Rowley said protests may only be stopped if there is a threat of serious disorder, and that the "very high threshold" has not been reached.

In her Times article, Ms Braverman claimed there was "a perception that senior officers play favourites when it comes to protesters".

Former Met Police Ch Supt Dal Babu noted the previous large-scale protests in central London in recent weeks have passed without public disorder.

He told BBC Breakfast the situation involving Ms Braverman is "very troubling". "Normally these conversations would be held behind closed doors," he said.

"The danger with the kind of language the home secretary has used - she talks about hate marches and she has been very derogatory about policing - is it will make far right groups more bold and possibly come out when there was no intention to do so.

"This is unprecedented and I hope people will use calm heads and calm voices to not to stoke up any potential disorder."

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTY3Mzc2OTk20gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNjczNzY5OTYuYW1w?oc=5

2023-11-10 09:34:14Z
2558083671

Far-right groups and football hooligans 'to descend on London during Palestine march' - The Independent

Far-right groups and football hooligans are preparing to descend on London on Armistice Day as hundreds of thousands of pro-Palestine protesters march through the capital.

The Palistinian Solidarity Campaign (PSC), said it will march alongside activists for the fourth successive weekend as it calls on Israel to agree to a ceasefire after its bombardment of Gaza.

Remembrance events are taking place across the Saturday and Sunday, which has led to home secretary Suella Braverman urging the Met Police to ban the march.

The coalition of groups, which includes the PSC, Stop the War and the Muslim Association of Britain, insisted they will press ahead with the demonstration calling for an immediate ceasefire.

The planned route does not go near the Cenotaph on Saturday.

Now English Defence League founder Tommy Robinson has spoken out against the demo, saying: “British men are mobilising for Saturday to be in London” to “show our Government and show our police and show Hamas and everyone sitting around the world saying ‘Britain has fallen’ that there is a resistance”.

A call to arms has also been issued on social media by the Democratic Football Lads Alliance, a right-wing organisation that uses football fan networks to spread Islamophobic hate.

A post on the group’s Facebook page says: “Vets have reached out and asked for our support due to the threat from the far-left and pro-Palestinian supporters to disrupt the Remembrance Day parade.

“We are calling on all football lads up and down the country to join us in standing shoulder to shoulder with our veterans that fought for our freedom.”

Robinson, real name Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, a convicted fraudster, joined the British National Party (BNP) in the mid-2000s.

Tommy Robinson has been fined £900 for failing to turn up at a High Court hearing to be questioned about his finances (Kirsty O’Connor/PA)

He left the group in 2013 and left the UK in 2020 to live in Spain.

It is understood he is now in the UK and has been posting dozens of pro-Israel tweets after his X account was unbanned by Elon Musk last week.

In a video he called for people to turn up in London to show there is a “resistance” and that “the silent majority have had enough” on our “sacred day”.

A further video posted yesterday said people going to central London must behave with “respect” but should be “prepared to defend if we need to defend”.

Police officers in front of Britain First and EDL protesters on Embankment in London, April 2017

According to Hope Not Hate, an anti-racist campaign group, other disparate groups, such as football hooligans could also mobilise in London, leading to fears these fringe groups could be difficult for the police to marshal.

The group told The Guardian that football hooligans associated with Patriotic Alternative, who have members with links to the BNP, have called for a presence in London.

The Democratic Football Lads Alliance, who have been publicly supported by Robinson in the past, and accused of spreading Islamophobia, said they will be in London on Saturday and Sunday.

A post on the group’s Facebook page said: “Vets have reached out and asked for our support due to the threat from the far-left and pro-Palestinian supporters to disrupt the Remembrance Day parade.

“We are calling on all football lads up and down the country to join us in standing shoulder to shoulder with our veterans that fought for our freedom.”

Protesters clash with police during the Democratic Football Lads Alliance march in London in 2020

The i newspaper reported that messages in one anti-Islamic WhatsApp group, containing more than 1,000 members, call on people to “fight back” against pro-Palestinian protesters and referred to them as “Islamists”.

The National Front (NF) who were the driving force of fascist politics in Britain for decades, said it will march to the Cenotaph on Sunday afternoon.

Nick Lowles, CEO of HOPE not hate: “Parts of the far right are trying to mobilise against the pro-Palestine demonstration taking place this weekend around Central London. However, these are by no means united efforts across the groups intending to head to London on Saturday.

“What remains to be seen is whether these groups have the power to mobilise in the way that they could several years ago. Tommy Robinson, his supporters, football hooligans and other far-right groups have failed in recent years to drum up sizable numbers, but their appetite for confrontation could still pose a risk even if there is a small presence.”

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiZWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmluZGVwZW5kZW50LmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWsvaG9tZS1uZXdzL2Zhci1yaWdodC1ncm91cHMtcGFsZXN0aW5lLW1hcmNoLWxvbmRvbi1iMjQ0NTAyOS5odG1s0gEA?oc=5

2023-11-10 09:05:34Z
2574553221

Prince Harry’s high court claim against Mail publisher can continue, judge rules - The Guardian

Prince Harry, Sir Elton John and Lady Doreen Lawrence have been given the green light to continue their legal case against the publisher of the Daily Mail, after it lost an attempt to have the cases thrown out at the high court.

The three high-profile individuals, along with David Furnish, Sadie Frost, Liz Hurley and Sir Simon Hughes, brought legal action against Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL) for unlawful information gathering.

According to a statement issued by lawyers for the six individuals, the claims include allegations of illegal activity, such as homes being bugged, deceptive tactics used to obtain private medical information, and the tapping of live phone calls.

The Daily Mail, which says the claims are “preposterous smears”, has denied the allegations. In March, ANL asked a judge to rule in its favour without a trial, arguing the legal challenges against it were brought “far too late”.

In a ruling on Friday, Mr Justice Nicklin said ANL had “not been able to deliver a ‘knockout blow’ to the claims of any of these claimants”.

Harry made a surprise appearance at the Royal Courts of Justice during the four-day preliminary hearing earlier this year, with John and Lawrence also appearing at the London court.

Adrian Beltrami KC, for ANL, said the individuals could have used “reasonable diligence” to discover if they had a potential claim before October 2016. The lawyer said the legal action against it had “no real prospects of succeeding” and was “barred” under a legal period of limitation.

Individuals have six years after learning they are potential victims to file a case. ANL says Harry and the other claimants began proceedings only in October 2022 but must have all had a reasonable suspicion that they were potential victims of illegal behaviour by Associated Newspapers prior to 2016, meaning they missed the six-year deadline.

The claimants argue they only recently learned they may have been victims of illegal information-gathering by individuals working for the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday. They argue they could not have brought the case earlier because they did not know they were potential victims. Their lawyers said they were “thrown off the scent” and not aware of being targeted, having believed “categorical denials” from ANL over any involvement in unlawful activity.

David Sherborne, representing the Duke of Sussex and others, said ANL’s attempt to have the claims ended was as “ambitious as it is unattractive” and that members of the group each had a “compelling case”.

Rival publishers, such as Rupert Murdoch’s News UK, have spent the past 15 years dealing with hundreds of claims of illegal activity at their newspapers, often related to phone hacking or obtaining material illegally.

ANL has escaped the same barrage of lawsuits and always strongly denied engaging in phone hacking at its outlets, although it has faced accusations about its use of private investigators.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMidWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRoZWd1YXJkaWFuLmNvbS91ay1uZXdzLzIwMjMvbm92LzEwL3ByaW5jZS1oYXJyeS1oaWdoLWNvdXJ0LWNsYWltLW1haWwtcHVibGlzaGVyLWNhbi1jb250aW51ZS1qdWRnZS1ydWxlc9IBdWh0dHBzOi8vYW1wLnRoZWd1YXJkaWFuLmNvbS91ay1uZXdzLzIwMjMvbm92LzEwL3ByaW5jZS1oYXJyeS1oaWdoLWNvdXJ0LWNsYWltLW1haWwtcHVibGlzaGVyLWNhbi1jb250aW51ZS1qdWRnZS1ydWxlcw?oc=5

2023-11-10 10:12:00Z
2590813376

Kamis, 09 November 2023

Pro-Palestinian protest in London: Row over Suella Braverman’s claim of police bias - BBC

Suella BravermanReuters

A row has erupted over Home Secretary Suella Braverman's attack on the Metropolitan Police for its handling of pro-Palestinian protests.

Writing in The Times, Ms Braverman accused the force of applying a "double standard" to its policing of protests.

She claimed aggressive right-wing protesters were "rightly met with a stern response", while "pro-Palestinian mobs" were "largely ignored".

Her comments have been condemned by former police officers and MPs.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is facing calls to sack Ms Braverman, with Labour accusing the home secretary of undermining police independence and "deliberately creating division".

One senior Conservative MP told the BBC: "The home secretary's awfulness is now a reflection on the prime minister. Keeping her in post is damaging him."

But the home secretary's allies on the right of the Conservative Party have defended her and argued that a pro-Palestinian march planned for Saturday in central London should not have been allowed to go ahead.

Conservative MP Danny Kruger denied Mrs Braverman was interfering, and said she was entitled to comment on the "broader culture of police".

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Ms Braverman comments came after Prime Minister Rishi Sunak held a meeting with Met Police commissioner Sir Mark Rowley to discuss security ahead of a pro-Palestinian march taking place this Saturday, which is also Armistice Day.

Neither Mr Sunak or Ms Braverman have publicly called for the police to ban Saturday's march, but the prime minister has urged organisers to call it off, saying the choice of date was "provocative and disrespectful".

In an article for The Times, the home secretary claimed that there was "a perception that senior officers play favourites when it comes to protesters".

The home secretary said the pro-Palestinian marches, which began last month in response to Israel's siege of Gaza, had been "problematic" because of "violence around the fringes" as well as "highly offensive" chants, posters and stickers.

"Right-wing and nationalist protesters who engage in aggression are rightly met with a stern response yet pro-Palestinian mobs displaying almost identical behaviour are largely ignored, even when clearly breaking the law," she wrote.

The BBC has been told Mr Sunak's team suggested amendments to the home secretary's draft, but not all of them were applied to the eventual article published last night.

A government source told the BBC: "We are not commenting on internal process."

There have been regular protests in London after Hamas gunmen launched an unprecedented assault on Israel from the Gaza Strip on 7 October, killing more than 1,400 people and taking more than 200 hostages.

Israel has been carrying out strikes on Gaza since then in response, and has now also launched a ground offensive. More than 10,500 people have been killed in Gaza, according to the Hamas-run health ministry.

London's police force has faced increasing pressure to prevent Saturday's pro-Palestinian march from going ahead.

But Met Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley has said it may only be stopped if there is a threat of serious disorder, and that the "very high threshold" has not been reached.

line

More on Israel-Gaza war

line

Plenty of the home secretary's colleagues agree with Ms Braverman on the substance of her article, but they are frustrated by repeatedly having to defend - or distance themselves from - her rhetoric.

One government figure told the BBC Mrs Braverman's intervention was "unhinged".

Labour's shadow home secretary Yvette Cooper described it as a "dangerous attempt to undermine respect for police", while London mayor Sadiq Khan said it was "irresponsible".

"The PM's weakness when it comes to standing up to Suella is the most shocking thing in all this," claimed a senior Labour source.

Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey said Mr Sunak "must finally act with integrity by sacking his out-of-control home secretary".

"Suella Braverman is now putting police officers in harm's way ahead of far right protesters flocking to the capital this weekend," Sir Ed said.

He said her remarks demonstrated the "increasing politicisation of policing", and how the march is handled should be an operational matter for officers.

A graphic showing the route of the pro-Palestinian march

In her article, Ms Braverman wrote that she believed the marches were not "merely a cry for help for Gaza", but an "assertion of primacy by certain groups - particularly Islamists - of the kind we are more used to seeing in Northern Ireland".

A source close to the home secretary told the BBC the comment was a reference to the activities of "dissident republicans".

Responding to the article, one Conservative Party source called the comparison with Northern Ireland "wholly offensive and ignorant".

Ms Braverman also questioned why "lockdown objectors were given no quarter by public order police yet Black Lives Matters demonstrators were enabled, allowed to break rules".

"I have spoken to serving and former police officers who have noted this double standard," the home secretary wrote.

Former cabinet minister Nadine Dorries claimed Ms Braverman was trying to get sacked to give her a platform of martyrdom in service of the right-wing.

"The competition is on now for who is going to be the leader of the opposition," Ms Dorries told the BBC.

News Daily banner

Sign up for our morning newsletter and get BBC News in your inbox.

News Daily banner

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/rss/articles/CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTY3MzY0NzQ10gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNjczNjQ3NDUuYW1w?oc=5

2023-11-09 11:37:23Z
2574553221