Kamis, 04 November 2021

Molnupiravir: UK becomes first country to approve 'game-changing' COVID-19 pill that can be taken at home - Sky News

The UK has become the first country to approve a "game-changing" anti-viral pill that can be taken at home to treat COVID-19.

Molnupiravir can be taken by those who have tested positive and have at least one risk factor for developing severe illness, such as obesity, being over 60, diabetes or heart disease.

After promising trial results, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) has said it is safe and effective at reducing the risk of hospital admission and death in people with mild to moderate COVID who are at extra risk from the virus.

Infections rise in every region but one; Police officer dies after six weeks in hospital - coronavirus latest

Developed by Ridgeback Biotherapeutics and Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), the drug works by interfering with the virus's replication.

It inhibits COVID-19 from multiplying, keeping levels low in the body and ultimately reducing the severity of the disease.

The drug should be taken as soon as possible following a positive test and within the first five days, the MHRA advises.

More on Covid-19

Last month, the government announced it had secured 480,000 courses of molnupiravir after a study showed it reduced the rate of hospital admissions and deaths by 50% in patients with mild to moderate symptoms.

The tablet was given twice a day to recently diagnosed patients, and the trial results made it one of the most promising drug developments of the pandemic so far.

Health Secretary Sajid Javid said: "Today is a historic day for our country, as the UK is now the first country in the world to approve an anti-viral that can be taken at home for COVID-19.

"This will be a gamechanger for the most vulnerable and the immunosuppressed, who will soon be able to receive the ground-breaking treatment."

He added: "We are working at pace across the government and with the NHS to set out plans to deploy molnupiravir to patients through a national study as soon as possible."

Follow the Daily podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker

Dr June Raine, MHRA chief executive, said the body is "satisfied" with molnupiravir being declared safe and effective for those at risk of developing severe COVID-19 disease and has granted its approval.

"Lagevrio (molnupiravir) is another therapeutic to add to our armoury against COVID-19," she said.

Analysis by Laura Bundock, health correspondent

The approval of this pill could be a significant moment.

It’s easy to take and can be done at home.

If the findings of the trial are right, it could dramatically cut the number of people with covid who end up in hospital.

As we head into a challenging winter this could really help pressure on the NHS.

There are though some unanswered questions. We don’t yet know when and how the drug will be given to patients.

The UK has already bought 480 thousand courses, but with daily infection numbers currently over 30 thousand, how long will it take before that supply runs out?

Another issue is cost. We don’t know how much the government has paid for the drug, but it is expensive, and many lower-income countries might not be able to afford its steep price tag.

"It is also the world's first approved anti-viral for this disease that can be taken by mouth rather than administered intravenously.

"This is important, because it means it can be administered outside of a hospital setting, before COVID-19 has progressed to a severe stage."

It comes as an estimated 1.2 million people in private households in the UK reported experiencing long COVID in the four weeks to 2 October, according to data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS).

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiigFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9tb2xudXBpcmF2aXItdWstYmVjb21lcy1maXJzdC1jb3VudHJ5LXRvLWFwcHJvdmUtZ2FtZS1jaGFuZ2luZy1jb3ZpZC0xOS1waWxsLXRoYXQtY2FuLWJlLXRha2VuLWF0LWhvbWUtMTI0NTk2ODPSAY4BaHR0cHM6Ly9uZXdzLnNreS5jb20vc3RvcnkvYW1wL21vbG51cGlyYXZpci11ay1iZWNvbWVzLWZpcnN0LWNvdW50cnktdG8tYXBwcm92ZS1nYW1lLWNoYW5naW5nLWNvdmlkLTE5LXBpbGwtdGhhdC1jYW4tYmUtdGFrZW4tYXQtaG9tZS0xMjQ1OTY4Mw?oc=5

2021-11-04 12:45:00Z
CBMiigFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9tb2xudXBpcmF2aXItdWstYmVjb21lcy1maXJzdC1jb3VudHJ5LXRvLWFwcHJvdmUtZ2FtZS1jaGFuZ2luZy1jb3ZpZC0xOS1waWxsLXRoYXQtY2FuLWJlLXRha2VuLWF0LWhvbWUtMTI0NTk2ODPSAY4BaHR0cHM6Ly9uZXdzLnNreS5jb20vc3RvcnkvYW1wL21vbG51cGlyYXZpci11ay1iZWNvbWVzLWZpcnN0LWNvdW50cnktdG8tYXBwcm92ZS1nYW1lLWNoYW5naW5nLWNvdmlkLTE5LXBpbGwtdGhhdC1jYW4tYmUtdGFrZW4tYXQtaG9tZS0xMjQ1OTY4Mw

Johnson's COVID-19 gambit steers Britain into uncharted winter waters - Reuters UK

LONDON, Nov 4 (Reuters) - Inside the British hospital that saved Prime Minister Boris Johnson from COVID-19, intensive care nurse Dave Carr just wants out.

"We are dead on our feet physically. We are dead on our feet mentally," he said. "I don't know how to get out of this mess. I can't walk away because of the guilt of leaving my colleagues."

Britain, its hospitals and its COVID-19 strategy are under the microscope as the country enters the dangerous winter period while accounting for almost a tenth of the world's recorded new infections.

Johnson outpaced many governments by lifting England's pandemic restrictions in one broad stroke in July, betting the National Health Service will be able to take the strain after a successful vaccination campaign. Some health frontliners, virologists and pandemic modellers aren't confident.

Even though COVID-19 hospitalisations are far lower than a year ago, the experts say pressures will be compounded by other winter viruses previously halted by lockdowns, as well as vaccine immunity fading and a backlog of treatment for other conditions.

"I wouldn't take those warnings from NHS staff lightly at all," said Imperial College London's Pablo Perez Guzman, who works on one of three models used to advise the government.

"That is an amount of pressure that the health system might struggle to cope with. Definitely."

While Britain's new cases have persisted above 30,000 a day since early September, vaccines have driven deaths from COVID-19 down by about 90% compared to January levels.

Yet if the concerns of Perez Guzman and eight other specialists interviewed by Reuters prove well-founded, Johnson may be forced to implement his "Plan B" aimed at protecting the NHS from "unsustainable pressure", involving mask mandates, vaccine passes and work-from-home orders. More economically damaging restrictions are not out of the question, scientists say.

The government said its focus was on administering vaccine boosters and inoculating 12 to 15-year-olds. It said the data didn't yet show Plan B was necessary, though the contingency was held at the ready.

Stephen Griffin, a virologist at the University of Leeds, predicted that the state-funded NHS would "get overwhelmed again".

"Even though COVID isn't responsible for as many of the ICU places as it has been in the past, it's still around a third of them, and that's going up," he told Reuters. "I don't know how they're expecting NHS staff to cope, mentally and physically."

Others leaders considering their own tactics are closely watching this global test case of whether vaccination is enough to live with the transmissible Delta variant of the virus.

Italian premier Mario Draghi said last month that he believed Britain had erred by opening up on July 19, a lesson that the world could not exit the crisis "in an instant".

"The United Kingdom, which was one of the countries that carried out the vaccination campaign with great speed, abandoning all caution, is now faced with about 50,000 daily infections and 200 deaths yesterday," he told lawmakers.

"Even in the exit it will be necessary to exit gradually."

MASKING DIFFERENCES

Exits preoccupy intensive care nurse Carr, who had decided to retire on April 19 last year before he found out that Britain was facing the worst pandemic in a century.

Now the 58-year-old says staff are overworked, stressed and exhausted trying to keep pace with an influx of patients at St Thomas' Hospital in London, where the prime minister said frontline workers saved his life last April.

"I absolutely detest walking towards the hospital when I go to work," Carr said. "I have checked in and really don't know how to get out."

Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust said it recognised the pressure on staff from the current demand, and that it was recruiting more nurses and providing support. It added that its critical care survival rates were among the best in the country.

Data for hospitals in England - home to more than 80% of the UK population - shows that the cumulative pressures are already straining the system, even though the 1,000 new COVID-19 admissions each day are lower than the 1,500 seen a year ago and 4,000 in January. And winter is yet to come.

Hospital accident and emergency departments treated 1.39 million patients in September, the highest number for any month on record. About a quarter of those waited more than four hours for treatment - the highest proportion since at least 2010.

While Britain isn't the only country confronting the challenges of COVID-19 while rebooting its health system, it was stretched long before the pandemic, with one of the lowest rates of hospital beds per capita in Europe. It has been hardest hit in the region by the disease with 140,000 deaths.

Johnson's exit strategy diverges from many other big economies, including Germany, France, Italy and Israel, which have either retained some basic COVID-19 measures like mask mandates or reintroduced them in response to rising cases.

Masks are still asked for in certain settings in England, including on public transport and when meeting infrequent contacts in enclosed spaces, but there is no legal requirement. As a result, mask usage has declined significantly, government scientific advisers said in October.

"We do not understand why the government has removed mandatory mask wearing in transport and in indoor settings like shops because that doesn't actually stop the economy functioning – but it would reduce infection," Chaand Nagpaul, chair of the British Medical Association (BMA) council, told Reuters.

"The government clearly believe these simple measures do make a difference, yet they're failing to act by not making these a requirement. Without other preventative measures put in place now, the challenges coming our way could go from being achievable to totally insurmountable."

'EPIDEMIC TRAJECTORIES'

Britain has about 40,000 daily cases of COVID-19, according to the latest seven-day average. That total is second only to the roughly 74,000 a day in the United States, which has five times more people.

Nonetheless, the situation is better than some projected when Johnson ended England's COVID-19 restrictions.

At the time, Health Secretary Sajid Javid warned that cases could hit 100,000 cases a day by the end of the summer. Instead, they peaked just below 55,000 cases a day two days before restrictions were lifted, falling away with the end of the Euro 2020 soccer championships and the start of the summer holidays.

But daily case numbers never fell below 20,000 a day, and there are over 9,000 patients in hospital even before the colder winter months ratchet up the pressure on the health system.

Javid said last month that infections could still hit 100,000 a day during winter. read more

While Britain excelled in its rapid initial rollout of vaccines, the programmes for booster shots and vaccinating children have been slower, just as the immunity in those vaccinated first starts to wane.

Only about a quarter of children aged 12 to 15 in England have had a shot, even though the government had hoped to have given all of them access to vaccines by last week.

"Regardless of how successful the booster vaccination campaign is, and other variables potentially considered, the NHS could still be put into under very high pressures," said Imperial College London's Perez Guzman.

"We have seen how time sensitive the introduction of measures are, and when introduction of public health interventions are delayed even by a few days or a week, the effect ... on the potential epidemic trajectories can be quite severe."

Additional reporting by Angelo Amante and Emilio Parodi; Editing by Guy Faulconbridge and Pravin Char

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMicWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnJldXRlcnMuY29tL3dvcmxkL3VrL2pvaG5zb25zLWNvdmlkLTE5LWdhbWJpdC1zdGVlcnMtYnJpdGFpbi1pbnRvLXVuY2hhcnRlZC13aW50ZXItd2F0ZXJzLTIwMjEtMTEtMDQv0gEA?oc=5

2021-11-04 07:10:00Z
CAIiEJpUSnWdKnhl2QRSPT998vUqGAgEKg8IACoHCAow3MukCjD92Xcws-mJBw

Migrant crossings: One dead and second missing off French coast - BBC News

A grey Border Force vessel
PA Media

A migrant has died while attempting to cross the English Channel, according to the French authorities.

A second person has been reported as missing.

One migrant was pulled from the water unconscious and was later pronounced dead when rescuers returned to dock on Wednesday.

Several boats are said to have got into difficulty in the Strait of Pas-de-Calais and 400 people have been rescued by French authorities.

It comes as the latest figures show more than 20,000 migrants have crossed the English Channel in small boats this year, more than double the total for 2020.

The Home Office said 456 people crossed in 15 boats on Tuesday, with 343 migrants stopped on the French coast.

Presentational grey line

Follow BBC South East on Facebook, on Twitter, and on Instagram. Send your story ideas to southeasttoday@bbc.co.uk

Related Internet Links

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiM2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLWVuZ2xhbmQta2VudC01OTE2MDU4NNIBN2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLWVuZ2xhbmQta2VudC01OTE2MDU4NC5hbXA?oc=5

2021-11-04 07:25:43Z
CBMiM2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLWVuZ2xhbmQta2VudC01OTE2MDU4NNIBN2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLWVuZ2xhbmQta2VudC01OTE2MDU4NC5hbXA

Owen Paterson suspension: Cabinet minister Kwasi Kwarteng questions future of Commons sleaze investigator - Sky News

A cabinet minister has questioned the future of parliament's sleaze investigator after her recommendation of a 30-day suspension for a Conservative MP was blocked by the prime minister and his Tory colleagues.

Business Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng told Sky News that it was "difficult" to see a future for Kathryn Stone, the independent parliamentary commissioner for standards.

It comes after her recommendation of a suspension for North Shropshire MP Owen Paterson, after he was found to have breached lobbying rules during his £110,000 a year private sector work, was blocked by Conservative MPs.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

'Shame': MPs vote against suspension of ex-minister

In a controversial House of Commons vote on Wednesday, which saw Boris Johnson's government accused of "corruption", Tory MPs passed a motion in favour of ignoring Ms Stone's recommendation.

They also supported the creation of a new Conservative-majority committee to look into a complete overhaul of parliament's standards rules and to reconsider Mr Paterson's case.

Three of those Tory MPs to vote in favour of rethink of the current standards rules are currently under investigation by Ms Stone themselves.

Asked about Ms Stone's future following the action by his fellow Tory MPs, Mr Kwarteng told Sky News: "I think it's difficult to see what the future of the commissioner is, given the fact that we're reviewing the process and we're overturning and trying to reform this whole process.

More on Conservatives

"But it's up to the commissioner to decide her position."

Pressed on whether he was calling for Ms Stone to resign, the business secretary added: "It's up to her to do that, it's up to anyone where they've made a judgement and people have sought to change that to consider their position, that's a natural thing.

"But I'm not saying she should resign."

Ms Stone's term as commissioner is due to finish in December next year. After Wednesday's Commons vote, her office said she would serve her full term.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Paterson: 'I wouldn't hesitate to do it again'

Responding to Mr Kwarteng's comments on Ms Stone's future, the Liberal Democrats accused the Conservatives of "governing like the mafia" and of "targeting those who uphold the rules rather than those who break them".

Dave Penman, the general secretary of the FDA union for public service employees, accused the government of "a blatant attempt to remove the last vestiges of independent oversight".

"After months of being stabbed in the back, the independent commissioner for standards has refused to resign," he posted on Twitter. "Now the government resorts to stabbing her in the front."

When the Commons vote result was announced, opposition MPs shouted "shame" at the Conservative benches.

But Mr Kwarteng said he did not feel shame "at all" about the move to save Mr Paterson from immediate suspension.

"It's not about the rights and wrongs of what Owen Paterson said or did or how he was paid," he said.

"I think the process is something that we want to look at, the fact is he had no right of appeal, and we feel that - in terms of parliament - people should have a right of appeal as they do in most employments throughout this country."

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

'This is not about what Owen Paterson did'

The business secretary added that MPs had been discussing parliament's disciplinary process "for years" and claimed Conservatives had voted in favour of a "more rigorous process".

"We've been talking about holding MPs to account, having the highest standards in public life, ways in which we can improve those standards and make people more accountable," Mr Kwarteng said.

"We've been talking about these sorts of things for many years now.

"And it so happens that yesterday, we passed a vote - a narrow vote, I think - in favour of actually trying to get a more rigorous process where people could have a right of appeal, and that's what my understanding of what happened yesterday in parliament was all about."

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Labour: Government has to change course

But Labour Party chair Anneliese Dodds said the government had had "ample opportunity" to reconsider the standards system prior to the vote on Mr Paterson's suspension.

"If they wanted to engage in that issue, they've had ample opportunity," she told Sky News.

"I'm afraid now they're just protecting one of their own and that sends a dreadful message about our politics,

"Boris Johnson has got to look again at this otherwise, I'm afraid, that name of Owen Paterson is going to go down as a byword for dirty, sleazy, corrupt politics."

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMijAFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9vd2VuLXBhdGVyc29uLXN1c3BlbnNpb24tY2FiaW5ldC1taW5pc3Rlci1rd2FzaS1rd2FydGVuZy1xdWVzdGlvbnMtZnV0dXJlLW9mLWNvbW1vbnMtc2xlYXplLWludmVzdGlnYXRvci0xMjQ1OTQ3OdIBkAFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9hbXAvb3dlbi1wYXRlcnNvbi1zdXNwZW5zaW9uLWNhYmluZXQtbWluaXN0ZXIta3dhc2kta3dhcnRlbmctcXVlc3Rpb25zLWZ1dHVyZS1vZi1jb21tb25zLXNsZWF6ZS1pbnZlc3RpZ2F0b3ItMTI0NTk0Nzk?oc=5

2021-11-04 08:37:30Z
CBMijAFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9vd2VuLXBhdGVyc29uLXN1c3BlbnNpb24tY2FiaW5ldC1taW5pc3Rlci1rd2FzaS1rd2FydGVuZy1xdWVzdGlvbnMtZnV0dXJlLW9mLWNvbW1vbnMtc2xlYXplLWludmVzdGlnYXRvci0xMjQ1OTQ3OdIBkAFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9hbXAvb3dlbi1wYXRlcnNvbi1zdXNwZW5zaW9uLWNhYmluZXQtbWluaXN0ZXIta3dhc2kta3dhcnRlbmctcXVlc3Rpb25zLWZ1dHVyZS1vZi1jb21tb25zLXNsZWF6ZS1pbnZlc3RpZ2F0b3ItMTI0NTk0Nzk

Rabu, 03 November 2021

Cervical cancer rates cut by almost 90% in women who had HPV vaccine, new study shows - Sky News

Cervical cancer rates are almost 90% lower in women vaccinated against HPV, a new study has found.

Women offered the vaccine between the ages of 12 and 13 were found to have cancer rates 87% lower than in previous generations, according to a study published in The Lancet.

Researchers also found a reduction of 62% in women vaccinated between ages 14 and 16.

Scotland introduced its national HPV immunisation programme for girls aged 12 to 13 in 2008
Image: England began rolling out its HPV vaccination programme in 2008

The first generation of women, who were offered "catch-up" jabs aged between 16 and 18, were found to have a 34% reduction in cervical cancer rates.

Professor Peter Sasieni, from King's College London and one of the authors of the paper, told Sky News some of the results were "almost too good to be true".

"Everything is on target to be preventing essentially all cancers from HPV 16 and 18 in vaccinated women," he said.

He said there was also "some cross-protection" for other cancers caused by the human papillomavirus and "some protection, although much less, to women of the same age who are not actually vaccinated".

More from UK

He continued: "There is a lot of vaccine hesitancy going on these days.

"People who are opposed to these vaccines can no longer say this vaccine doesn't prevent cancer because this makes it absolutely clear it is having a dramatic effect on cervical cancer incidents."

With COVID-19 vaccination now taking place in schools, he said there are pressures to move HPV jabs from the autumn to the summer term.

"We need to think about the impact that will have," he said.

"People don't come in because they are revising, or they only come in for exams. So to get the same uptake of the vaccine will be challenging - as I am sure it has been challenging the last year and a half because of COVID."

Follow the Daily podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker

HPV vaccination has been introduced in 100 countries as part of efforts by the World Health Organisation (WHO) to eliminate cervical cancer.

It is a common sexually transmitted infection, with some types being linked to cervical cancer in women and head and neck cancer in men.

The English HPV vaccination programme was introduced in 2008, with vaccines given to women aged between 12 and 13 and "catch-up" jabs offered to older age groups up to the age of 18.

England initially used a bivalent vaccine, which protects against the two most common types of HPV, responsible for approximately 70% to 80% of all cervical cancers. Since September 2012, the quadrivalent vaccine Gardasil has been used instead.

The study looked at the population-based cancer registry data between January 2006 and June 2019 for seven cohorts of women, aged between 20 and 64.

Teenage boys aged 12 and 13 will be vaccinated against the HPV viruses from September
Image: Women offered the vaccine between the ages of 12 and 13 have an 87% reduction in cancer rates

During that time frame, 28,000 diagnoses of cervical cancer and 300,000 diagnoses of non-invasive cervical carcinoma (CIN3) in total were recorded in England.

In the three vaccinated cohorts, there were just 638 cases of cervical cancers and 18,662 cases of CIN3 compared to the non-vaccinated population.

Prof Sasieni said cases in young women were "very traumatic on everyone".

"When talking to colleagues who treat women, they always remember the young ones and sometimes it is very aggressive and they can't help that much," he said.

One of the benefits of such an effective vaccine, he said, could mean women require less cervical screening, adding: "It doesn't make sense to say you need to continue screening in the same way."

The vaccine is expected to prevent 64,000 cervical cancers and almost 50,000 other cancers by 2058
Image: In the three vaccinated cohorts, there were around 450 fewer cases of cervical cancers

But he said until the policy was changed, "the last thing we want is for women to think, I have been vaccinated so I don't need to attend my screening - because that could have really serious consequences".

The authors of the study did acknowledge some limitations - principally that cervical cancer diagnosis is rare in young women. Because the vaccinated populations are still young, the authors also stressed this means that it is still too early to assess the full impact of HPV immunisation on cervical cancer rates.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMid2h0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2NlcnZpY2FsLWNhbmNlci1yYXRlcy1jdXQtYnktYWxtb3N0LTkwLWluLXdvbWVuLXdoby1oYWQtaHB2LXZhY2NpbmUtbmV3LXN0dWR5LXNob3dzLTEyNDU4ODQ20gF7aHR0cHM6Ly9uZXdzLnNreS5jb20vc3RvcnkvYW1wL2NlcnZpY2FsLWNhbmNlci1yYXRlcy1jdXQtYnktYWxtb3N0LTkwLWluLXdvbWVuLXdoby1oYWQtaHB2LXZhY2NpbmUtbmV3LXN0dWR5LXNob3dzLTEyNDU4ODQ2?oc=5

2021-11-04 01:53:38Z
CBMid2h0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2NlcnZpY2FsLWNhbmNlci1yYXRlcy1jdXQtYnktYWxtb3N0LTkwLWluLXdvbWVuLXdoby1oYWQtaHB2LXZhY2NpbmUtbmV3LXN0dWR5LXNob3dzLTEyNDU4ODQ20gF7aHR0cHM6Ly9uZXdzLnNreS5jb20vc3RvcnkvYW1wL2NlcnZpY2FsLWNhbmNlci1yYXRlcy1jdXQtYnktYWxtb3N0LTkwLWluLXdvbWVuLXdoby1oYWQtaHB2LXZhY2NpbmUtbmV3LXN0dWR5LXNob3dzLTEyNDU4ODQ2

Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up - BBC News

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Conservative Owen Paterson has avoided punishment for now as the government ordered its MPs to back a review of standards investigations.

The result of the vote was met with cries of "shame" from opposition MPs.

Mr Paterson was found to have misused his position as an MP to benefit two companies he worked for.

But he said the probe into his conduct had been unfair - and the government backed plans by his allies to overhaul the system.

Labour, the SNP and Lib Dems voted against the plans, along with 13 Conservative MPs, but it was carried by 18 votes after a heated Commons debate.

In a statement after the vote, Mr Paterson said: "After two years of hell, I now have the opportunity to clear my name."

In an interview with the BBC, he thanked the MPs who voted for the overhaul, acknowledging they had "taken a political hit".

"But we will at last now be able to create a proper system, based on the rules of natural justice," he added.

Labour's deputy leader Angela Rayner accused the Conservatives of being "rotten to the core" and called the move an "absolute disgrace".

She said Labour would "not be taking any part in this sham process or any corrupt committee", with the SNP and Lib Dems also saying they would boycott the overhaul.

The controversy comes after a committee of MPs recommended Mr Paterson be suspended from the Commons for 30 days, following a damning report into his conduct by the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner Kathryn Stone.

The report said the former Northern Ireland secretary had breached Commons rules by lobbying government bodies about Randox and Lynn's Country Foods, which employed him as a paid consultant.

At Prime Minister's Questions, Boris Johnson said MPs found to have broken the rules should get a right of appeal, as would happen with doctors and teachers found guilty of misconduct.

But the SNP's Pete Wishart accused the government of "attempting to turn back the clock to the worst examples of 1990s Tory sleaze".

Owen Paterson
House of Commons

Ahead of the vote, the committee's Labour chairman Chris Bryant told MPs Mr Paterson had lobbied ministers "time and again, in a way that conferred a direct benefit on his paying clients".

"That is expressly forbidden. It is a corrupt practice," he added.

He said Mr Paterson had been given "every opportunity" to put his case across - and his arguments had been heard "respectfully and fairly".

2px presentational grey line
Analysis box by Laura Kuenssberg, political editor

Every MP who backed today's move can expect to have it used against them on political leaflets or Facebook campaigns.

There could be serious consequences in Parliament if the opposition parties decide to use this moment to withdraw cooperation on other committees or ways of working.

Some ministers already fear this is an episode that Downing Street may come to regret.

Owen Paterson is adamant that he did nothing wrong, and has been denied natural justice.

But with this Tory response, voters may well come to wonder, what's fair about this?

2px presentational grey line

The Commons standards committee found that the North Shropshire MP had used his parliamentary office on 16 occasions for meetings relating to his outside business interests and sent two letters relating to business interests on House of Commons-headed notepaper.

It described the MP's actions as "an egregious case of paid advocacy".

However Mr Paterson, a former Northern Ireland secretary, denied any wrongdoing, and argued his approaches had been within the rules because he was seeking to alert ministers to defects in safety regulations.

He said the investigation had "a major contributory factor" in the death of his wife, Rose, who took her own life last year.

He claimed he had been pronounced guilty "without being spoken to" and that "no proper investigation was undertaken".

On Wednesday, MPs debated whether the recommended 30-day suspension for Mr Paterson should be enforced, with allies of Mr Paterson proposing a new committee to look at how investigations are carried out.

The prime minister backed the proposed shake-up of the rules and ordered his MPs to vote for MP Andrea Leadsom's motion, ensuring it was carried.

Andrea Leadsom
Getty Images

However, 13 Conservatives voted against the amendment, while 98 had no vote recorded - either by a deliberate abstention or because they were not able to vote.

Tory MP Angela Richardson appeared to confirm she was no longer a parliamentary aide to ministers after defying government orders to vote for the amendment and abstaining instead.

As a parliamentary private secretary, she would normally be expected to resign in order to oppose the government.

Writing on Twitter, she said: "I abstained on the Leadsom amendment aware that my job was at risk, but it was a matter of principle for me."

Aaron Bell - a Tory who opposed the amendment - said the proposals made it look "like we're moving the goalposts" and that any reform of the rules needed support across the Commons.

Liberal Democrat chief whip Wendy Chamberlain described the amendment as a "stitch-up", adding: "You expect in a tin-pot dictatorship, not the home of parliamentary democracy."

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTU5MTU0MjIx0gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNTkxNTQyMjEuYW1w?oc=5

2021-11-03 20:36:34Z
CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTU5MTU0MjIx0gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNTkxNTQyMjEuYW1w

Owen Paterson: Anger as Tory MP avoids suspension in rule shake-up - BBC News

This video can not be played

To play this video you need to enable JavaScript in your browser.

Conservative Owen Paterson has avoided punishment for now as the government ordered its MPs to back a review of standards investigations.

The result of the vote was met with cries of "shame" from opposition MPs.

Mr Paterson was found to have misused his position as an MP to benefit two companies he worked for.

But he said the probe into his conduct had been unfair - and the government backed plans by his allies to overhaul the system.

Labour, the SNP and Lib Dems voted against the plans, along with 13 Conservative MPs, but it was carried by 18 votes after a heated Commons debate.

Responding to the result, Mr Paterson said: "All I have ever asked is to have the opportunity to make my case through a fair process.

"After two years of hell, I now have the opportunity to clear my name."

Labour's deputy leader Angela Rayner accused the Conservatives of being "rotten to the core" and called the move an "absolute disgrace".

She said Labour would "not be taking any part in this sham process or any corrupt committee", with the SNP and Lib Dems also saying they would boycott the overhaul.

The controversy comes after Parliamentary Standards Commissioner Kathryn Stone recommended Mr Paterson be suspended from the Commons for 30 days, following a damning report into his conduct by a committee of MPs.

The report said the former Northern Ireland secretary had breached Commons rules by lobbying government bodies about Randox and Lynn's Country Foods, which employed him as a paid consultant.

At Prime Minister's Questions, Boris Johnson said MPs found to have broken the rules should get a right of appeal, as would happen with doctors and teachers found guilty of misconduct.

But the SNP's Pete Wishart accused the government of "attempting to turn back the clock to the worst examples of 1990s Tory sleaze".

Owen Paterson
House of Commons

Ahead of the vote, the committee's Labour chairman Chris Bryant told MPs Mr Paterson had lobbied ministers "time and again, in a way that conferred a direct benefit on his paying clients".

"That is expressly forbidden. It is a corrupt practice," he added.

He said Mr Paterson had been given "every opportunity" to put his case across - and his arguments had been heard "respectfully and fairly".

2px presentational grey line
Analysis box by Laura Kuenssberg, political editor

Every MP who backed today's move can expect to have it used against them on political leaflets or Facebook campaigns.

There could be serious consequences in Parliament if the opposition parties decide to use this moment to withdraw cooperation on other committees or ways of working.

Some ministers already fear this is an episode that Downing Street may come to regret.

Owen Paterson is adamant that he did nothing wrong, and has been denied natural justice.

But with this Tory response, voters may well come to wonder, what's fair about this?

2px presentational grey line

The Commons standards committee found that the North Shropshire MP had used his parliamentary office on 16 occasions for meetings relating to his outside business interests and sent two letters relating to business interests on House of Commons-headed notepaper.

It described the MP's actions as "an egregious case of paid advocacy".

However Mr Paterson, a former Northern Ireland secretary, denied any wrongdoing, and argued his approaches had been within the rules because he was seeking to alert ministers to defects in safety regulations.

He said the investigation had "a major contributory factor" in the death of his wife, Rose, who took her own life last year.

He claimed he had been pronounced guilty "without being spoken to" and that "no proper investigation was undertaken".

On Wednesday, MPs debated whether the recommended 30-day suspension for Mr Paterson should be enforced, with allies of Mr Paterson proposing a new committee to look at how investigations are carried out.

The prime minister backed the proposed shake-up of the rules and ordered his MPs to vote for MP Andrea Leadsom's motion, ensuring it was carried.

Andrea Leadsom
Getty Images

However, 13 Conservatives voted against the amendment, while 98 had no vote recorded - either by a deliberate abstention or because they were not able to vote.

Aaron Bell - a Tory who opposed the amendment - said the proposals made it look "like we're moving the goalposts" and that any reform of the rules needed support across the Commons.

Liberal Democrat chief whip Wendy Chamberlain described the amendment as a "stitch-up", adding: "You expect in a tin-pot dictatorship, not the home of parliamentary democracy."

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTU5MTU0MjIx0gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNTkxNTQyMjEuYW1w?oc=5

2021-11-03 17:42:49Z
CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTU5MTU0MjIx0gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNTkxNTQyMjEuYW1w