Kamis, 17 Juni 2021

Manchester Arena bomber Salman Abedi should have been identified as threat on night of attack, inquiry finds - Sky News

Manchester Arena bomber Salman Abedi should have been identified as a threat on the night of his attack - and it is "highly likely" more lives could have been saved, an inquiry has found.

Sir John Saunders, who is chairing the probe into the 2017 terror attack, said "more should have been done" by police and security before Abedi detonated his device outside an Ariana Grande concert, killing 22 innocent people and injuring hundreds more.

In a damning first report from the inquiry, Sir John said the arena's operator SMG, security company Showsec and British Transport Police (BTP) were "principally responsible for the missed opportunities" - but there were also "failings by individuals".

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Arena bombing: 'Failings by individuals'

He said the "most striking missed opportunity" was that a member of the public, Christopher Wild, raised concerns about Abedi to security guard Mohammed Agha minutes before the bombing - but the effect of the steward's actions "was to fob (Mr Wild) off".

Sir John said: "The security arrangements for the Manchester Arena… should have prevented or minimised the devastating impact of the attack. They failed to do so.

"There were a number of opportunities which were missed leading to this failure.

"Salman Abedi should have been identified on 22 May 2017 as a threat by those responsible for the security of the arena and a disruptive intervention undertaken.

More on Greater Manchester

"Had that occurred, I consider it likely that Abedi would still have detonated his device, but the loss of life and injury is highly likely to have been less."

Salman Abedi killed 22 innocent people
Image: Salman Abedi killed 22 innocent people when he blew himself up at Manchester Arena

The missed opportunities set out by the inquiry included:

• The actions of security guard Kyle Lawler who tried to use his radio to alert the security control room after concerns were raised about Abedi but could not get through, before he left the foyer "unconcerned". Mr Lawler told the inquiry he had a "bad feeling" about Abedi but did not approach him for fear of being branded a racist

Kyle Lawler was on duty as a security guard on the night of the Manchester Arena bombing
Image: Security guard Kyle Lawler

• SMG's "inadequate" CCTV system that left a blind spot allowing Abedi to hide for an hour in the foyer of the arena before he blew himself up

• No "adequate security patrol" by Showsec in the foyer of the arena for 30 minutes before the attack, as Abedi hid out of sight from CCTV cameras

• Mr Agha failing to notice Abedi acting suspiciously in the foyer of the arena about an hour before the attack after Showsec did not adequately train him

Mohammed Agha
Image: Security guard Mohammed Agha

The inquiry heard none of the four BTP officers on patrol were in the arena's foyer at the time of the attack - despite instructions that one officer should be positioned there at the end of the concert.

Sir John said a "competent BTP officer would have taken action that could have saved lives", had one of the officers been in the foyer instead of leaving it unattended after 10pm.

None of the four police officers on patrol were in the foyer when the bomb went off
Image: None of the four police officers on patrol were in the foyer when the bomb went off

Two of the officers, PC Jessica Bullough and PCSO Mark Renshaw took a two-hour meal break that evening - which included a five-mile trip for a kebab - which PC Bullough told the inquiry was "unacceptable".

Among nine recommendations in his report, Sir John said a "Protect Duty" for better security at venues should be written into law, following a campaign from the mother of victim Martyn Hett.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

'Today our heartbreak turns to anger'

The inquiry chairman said Mr Wild had been "very responsible" to alert security after forming the view that Abedi might "let a bomb off".

"That was sadly all too prescient and makes all the more distressing the fact that no effective steps were taken as a result of the efforts made by Christopher Wild," he added.

Sir John described the terror attack as a "wicked act inspired by distorted ideology of the so-called Islamic State".

He said that the responsibility for the attack lies with Abedi and his younger brother Hashem, who was jailed for life for helping plan the atrocity, but his inquiry had to decide "whether more could and should have been done" to stop the bomber.

The retired High Court judge said he was "urged by everyone to avoid looking for scapegoats" and insisted he had "not looked to blame anyone".

But he said where "individuals have fallen below the proper standard of carrying out their roles of protecting concertgoers I have said so".

In response to the report, SMG said it was "committed to working with the inquiry to help the families of victims and survivors better understand the events of that evening, as well as look at the lessons learnt".

The arena's operator said it would be reviewing the findings and recommendations and "any additional actions we should take, we will take as we continuously challenge ourselves to be better".

BTP Chief Constable Lucy D'Orsi said the force would be "carefully reviewing the findings", and that it has been examining "procedures, operational planning and training since this dreadful attack took place in 2017".

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Arena victim's mother calls for 'Martyn's law'

The inquiry's report is the first of three being published in the coming months.

A further report will follow on the emergency response and the experience of each of those who died, and finally an analysis of whether the atrocity committed by Abedi could have been prevented.

Analysis: Learning from mistakes of Manchester Arena attack can be its legacy

By Tom Parmenter, north of England correspondent

The responsibility for the Manchester bomb lies with the 22-year old who detonated it and his younger brother who helped build it. That's not in doubt.

The point of understanding what happened and what went wrong is to ensure something meaningful and tangible can come from the horrific night in May 2017 that is seared into the collective memory of this city.

Taken together, the series of security lapses on the night of the attack mean that, in the inquiry chairman's view, it is "highly likely" lives could have been saved.

The suicide bomber would still probably have detonated his bomb - but if the security operation had done its job, he would have been monitored while acting suspiciously and potentially challenged.

Had police officers been in the foyer, as per their orders, it would have been them being alerted by a member of the public rather than poorly trained security teams who had radios that failed them.

Arena management could have closed the doors so that fewer people would have been in the foyer where he ultimately detonated the device at 10:31pm.

The word "if" is used repeatedly throughout today's report.

Sadly nothing changes the hard facts of what happened over four years ago. It is through truly learning from the mistakes that contributed to the 22 deaths, and the appalling injuries people suffered, that can be the legacy of the attack.

It is the least that the victims of the cowardly terrorist deserve.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMihQFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9tYW5jaGVzdGVyLWFyZW5hLWF0dGFjay1zZWN1cml0eS1mYWlsaW5ncy1sZWQtdG8tbWlzc2VkLW9wcG9ydHVuaXRpZXMtdG8tc2F2ZS1saXZlcy1pbnF1aXJ5LWZpbmRzLTEyMzMzOTY10gGJAWh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2FtcC9tYW5jaGVzdGVyLWFyZW5hLWF0dGFjay1zZWN1cml0eS1mYWlsaW5ncy1sZWQtdG8tbWlzc2VkLW9wcG9ydHVuaXRpZXMtdG8tc2F2ZS1saXZlcy1pbnF1aXJ5LWZpbmRzLTEyMzMzOTY1?oc=5

2021-06-17 14:27:29Z
52781673706255

Dominic Cummings claims: Rees-Mogg defends Hancock as 'successful genius' - BBC News

Commons leader Jacob Rees-Mogg has hailed Health Secretary Matt Hancock as a "successful genius" - after he was allegedly branded "hopeless" by the PM.

It comes after Boris Johnson's ex-aide Dominic Cummings released messages critical of the health secretary.

Mr Rees-Mogg dismissed them as "trivia", adding that Mr Hancock's work had made the world safer.

But Labour's leader said the prime minister's border policies showed he was "as hopeless as Hancock".

Sir Keir Starmer added that not imposing stronger controls on arrivals from India had forced the four-week extension of England's Covid restrictions.

On Wednesday, Mr Cummings - who was forced out of Downing Street after an internal power struggle - released a series of WhatsApp exchanges between himself and his former boss, dated to early last year.

In one of them, Mr Johnson purportedly called Mr Hancock "Totally [expletive] hopeless".

In another, he appeared to say his procurement of personal protective equipment had been a "disaster," and that he wanted to hand some of Mr Hancock's duties to Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove.

Downing Street did not deny the authenticity of the messages, but insisted the prime minister had full confidence in the health secretary.

Thangham Debbonaire

In the House of Commons on Thursday, Labour's Thangam Debbonaire asked: "Why did the prime minister keep on as health secretary someone he thought was hopeless in a global health crisis?

"The British people recognise incompetence and waste when they see it. They know what's right and what's not and they know when a minister is hopeless."

But Mr Rees-Mogg replied: "There's a great line from Dr [Samuel] Johnson, that in lapidary inscriptions [engravings in stone] a man is not on oath.

"And I think the same applies to text messages, which are essentially the trivia, the flotsam and jetsam, the ephemera of life, and they're fundamentally unimportant."

He praised the plan agreed at last weekend's G7 summit in Cornwall to distribute one billion Covid vaccines to poorer nations, lauding Mr Hancock's role in arranging the UK's contribution "so successfully".

'Hopeless as Hancock'

He called his cabinet colleague "the brilliant, the one and only successful genius who has been running health over the last 15 months", adding that "he has done so much to make not only the country but the world safer".

But speaking later on Thursday, Sir Keir Starmer criticised the government's decision not to add India to the travel red until 23 April, arguing it had hastened the spread of the Delta variant of the virus first identified there to the UK.

He said the spread of that variant had made the four-week delay to the next stage of England's unlocking - supported by Labour at a vote on Wednesday - "inevitable".

He said the Delta variant "wouldn't be here" if tougher travel rules had instead been applied after 1 April, calling it "the only reason we're not unlocking".

"There's only one reason we've got the Delta variant, and that's because the prime minister failed to secure the border," he added.

"So the prime minister is as hopeless as Hancock."

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTU3NTEzNDE10gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNTc1MTM0MTUuYW1w?oc=5

2021-06-17 13:27:30Z
52781672576361

Dominic Cummings claims: Rees-Mogg defends Hancock as 'successful genius' - BBC News

Commons leader Jacob Rees-Mogg has hailed Health Secretary Matt Hancock as a "successful genius" - after he was allegedly branded "hopeless" by the PM.

It comes after Boris Johnson's ex-aide Dominic Cummings released messages critical of the health secretary.

Mr Rees-Mogg dismissed them as "trivia", adding that Mr Hancock's work had made the world safer.

But Labour's leader said the prime minister's border policies showed he was "as hopeless as Hancock".

Sir Keir Starmer added that not imposing stronger controls on arrivals from India had forced the four-week extension of England's Covid restrictions.

On Wednesday, Mr Cummings - who was forced out of Downing Street after an internal power struggle - released a series of WhatsApp exchanges between himself and his former boss, dated to early last year.

In one of them, Mr Johnson purportedly called Mr Hancock "Totally [expletive] hopeless".

In another, he appeared to say his procurement of personal protective equipment had been a "disaster," and that he wanted to hand some of Mr Hancock's duties to Cabinet Office Minister Michael Gove.

Downing Street did not deny the authenticity of the messages, but insisted the prime minister had full confidence in the health secretary.

Thangham Debbonaire

In the House of Commons on Thursday, Labour's Thangam Debbonaire asked: "Why did the prime minister keep on as health secretary someone he thought was hopeless in a global health crisis?

"The British people recognise incompetence and waste when they see it. They know what's right and what's not and they know when a minister is hopeless."

But Mr Rees-Mogg replied: "There's a great line from Dr [Samuel] Johnson, that in lapidary inscriptions [engravings in stone] a man is not on oath.

"And I think the same applies to text messages, which are essentially the trivia, the flotsam and jetsam, the ephemera of life, and they're fundamentally unimportant."

He praised the plan agreed at last weekend's G7 summit in Cornwall to distribute one billion Covid vaccines to poorer nations, lauding Mr Hancock's role in arranging the UK's contribution "so successfully".

'Hopeless as Hancock'

He called his cabinet colleague "the brilliant, the one and only successful genius who has been running health over the last 15 months", adding that "he has done so much to make not only the country but the world safer".

But speaking later on Thursday, Sir Keir Starmer criticised the government's decision not to add India to the travel red until 23 April, arguing it had hastened the spread of the Delta variant of the virus first identified there to the UK.

He said the spread of that variant had made the four-week delay to the next stage of England's unlocking - supported by Labour at a vote on Wednesday - "inevitable".

He said the Delta variant "wouldn't be here" if tougher travel rules had instead been applied after 1 April, calling it "the only reason we're not unlocking".

"There's only one reason we've got the Delta variant, and that's because the prime minister failed to secure the border," he added.

"So the prime minister is as hopeless as Hancock."

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTU3NTEzNDE10gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNTc1MTM0MTUuYW1w?oc=5

2021-06-17 12:24:24Z
52781672576361

Manchester Arena Inquiry: Bomber 'should have been identified as a threat' - BBC News

Top row (left to right): Alison Howe, Martyn Hett, Lisa Lees, Courtney Boyle, Eilidh MacLeod, Elaine McIver, Georgina Callander, Jane Tweddle - Middle row (left to right): John Atkinson, Kelly Brewster, Liam Curry, Chloe Rutherford, Marcin Klis, Angelika Klis, Megan Hurley, Michelle Kiss - Bottom row (left to right): Nell Jones, Olivia Campbell-Hardy, Philip Tron, Saffie-Rose Roussos, Sorrell Leczkowski, Wendy Fawell
Family handouts

Manchester Arena suicide bomber Salman Abedi should have been identified as a threat on the night of the atrocity by those in charge of security, a public inquiry into the 2017 attack has found.

Inquiry chairman Sir John Saunders found there were missed opportunities to prevent the "devastating impact".

He said it was likely Abedi would have detonated his device if confronted but "the loss of life and injury is highly likely to have been less".

Twenty-two people died in the bombing.

Hundreds more were injured when Manchester-born Abedi, who was of Libyan descent, walked across the foyer of the arena and detonated the bomb at 22: 31 BST on 22 May 2017.

The public inquiry into the attack started in September 2020 and was set up to explore the circumstances leading up to and surrounding the bombing.

'Fobbed off'

The report, which is the first of three to be published by the inquiry, examines security failures relating to the attack.

It has levelled criticism at British Transport Police (BTP), the arena operators SMG, and their contracted security providers, Showsec.

Sir John said two teenage stewards did not react "as robustly and effectively as they should have" when a member of the public, Christopher Wild, raised his concerns about the bomber.

He said Mr Wild was "fobbed off".

The inquiry chairman called this "the most striking missed opportunity".

Presentational grey line

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the fullest version.

Related Internet Links

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiOWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLWVuZ2xhbmQtbWFuY2hlc3Rlci01NzUxMTA3OdIBPWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLWVuZ2xhbmQtbWFuY2hlc3Rlci01NzUxMTA3OS5hbXA?oc=5

2021-06-17 13:16:15Z
52781673706255

‘Nobody asked them!’ Brexiteer silences Coveney as he shreds ‘unconstitutional’ EU deal - Daily Express

Brexit: UK 'can't decide unilaterally' on protocol says Coveney

Critics within the Unionist community are deeply concerned because the agreement requires to adhere to rules and regulations for goods travelling to and from the British mainland, something they regard as having imposed a border down the Irish Sea. posted: “Don’t know how many times this needs to be said before it’s fully accepted as true.

“NI Protocol is a technical trading arrangement to manage the disruption of #Brexit for the island of #Ireland to the greatest extent possible…. It’s not about constitutional matters.”

However, Baron Moylan, the former chairman of the London Legacy Development Corporation, disagreed vehemently.

Responding to Mr Coveney’s tweet, he said: “I don’t know how often this has to be stated: a constitution is about the allocation of decision-making to different arms of the state and the NI Protocol changes who makes decisions about laws there. So it is clearly a constitutional change.”

Baron Moylan told Express.co.uk: “It goes back to the Good Friday Agreement, which says that there shouldn't be a change in Northern Ireland’s constitutional status without a referendum.

Simon Coveney

Simon Coveney, Ireland's Minister of Foreign Affairs (Image: GETTY)

Lord Moylan

Lord Moylan's response to Simon Coveney (Image: Twitter)

“Now, if you look at the Northern Ireland protocol the very first words on the first page say this is not the change in the constitutional status of Northern Ireland, because they're trying to preclude the idea that it needs a referendum.

“In my view, that's simply untrue, but he’s sticking to that, he's saying it is not a constitutional change.

“But I'm saying it is because you're changing now who makes the laws in Northern Ireland and now the EU is a lawmaker in Northern Ireland

“And so I think it is a constitutional change.

JUST IN: EU in a nutshell! German vaccine just 47% effective

Prime Minister Boris Johnson

Prime Minister Boris Johnson (Image: GETTY)

“Whether you need a referendum on the Good Friday Agreement or not ties into a second point that is related, which is that the people of Northern Ireland had never been asked if they want the Protocol.” 

Baron Moylan, who also served as the Prime Minister’s airport adviser when he was Mayor of London, explained: “The best Boris could get was an assembly vote in 2024.”

Under the Good Friday Agreement, such a major change should be introduced with the consent of both communities Baron Moylan said.

However, because such a vote would offer the Unionists a veto, the EU had refused, he pointed out.

DON'T MISS
Boris urged to shrug off EU's 'constraining' system post-Brexit [OPINION]
Britons mock France as fishermen plead for deal [REACTION]
Andrew Neil warns UK to struggle to secure deals with two nations [WATCH]

Baron Moylan

Baron Moylan speaking in Parliament (Image: Parliament TV)

Simon Coveney Leo Varadkar

Simon Coveney and Leo Varadkar in 2016 (Image: GETTY)

He added: “In fact there has been a change to the Good Friday Agreement in the way it works in Northern Ireland to allow for that.

“So I’m saying I do not think that is good enough. First of all it's three years down the road, and normally when you have a new system you vote for it before it starts.

“And secondly, it's the assembly, and maybe it should be a wider vote and so on.

“That the point - it’s the democratic deficit about the Northern Ireland protocol and the way it operates.”

Brexit Express

Brexit in Express front pages (Image: Express)

Baron Moylan argued Mr Coveney’s remarks were characteristic of the “dogmatic” thinking of both Ireland and the EU when it came to the Protocol, and Brexit in general.

He said: “The Irish Government sticks very closely to the EU line, that’s a deliberate choice on that part.

“I'm fairly sure the Irish government does understand the political and community situation in Northern Ireland - but I don't think the EU has much of a clue.

“They think ‘Northern Ireland voted remain so they must be happy to stick to our rules.’

Northern Ireland Protocol

The Northern Ireland Protocol is a cause for concern in the Unionist community (Image: GETT)

I think they have used Northern Ireland as a bargaining chip

Baron Moylan

“I think they have used Northern Ireland as a bargaining chip.”

Speaking today, Mr Coveney also Ireland's Foreign Affairs Minister Simon Coveney has welcomed the announcement that a First Minister and deputy First Minister of Northern Ireland will be nominated later.

Mr Coveney said it will allow the Northern Ireland Executive to continue its "essential work" on behalf of the people of Northern Ireland.

He added: "We look forward to working with the First and deputy First Minister, and all the parties in the Northern Ireland Executive, to the mutual benefit of people North and South, including at the next plenary meeting of the North South Ministerial Council which is planned for Friday in Armagh."

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMigAFodHRwczovL3d3dy5leHByZXNzLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvcG9saXRpY3MvMTQ1MTA5OC9icmV4aXQtbmV3cy1zaW1vbi1jb3ZlbmV5LWlyZWxhbmQtbm9ydGhlcm4taXJlbGFuZC1wcm90b2NvbC1ldS1uZXdzLWxlby12YXJhZGthctIBhAFodHRwczovL3d3dy5leHByZXNzLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvcG9saXRpY3MvMTQ1MTA5OC9icmV4aXQtbmV3cy1zaW1vbi1jb3ZlbmV5LWlyZWxhbmQtbm9ydGhlcm4taXJlbGFuZC1wcm90b2NvbC1ldS1uZXdzLWxlby12YXJhZGthci9hbXA?oc=5

2021-06-17 10:49:00Z
52781674674788

Jeffrey Archer Defends Matt Hancock After Dominic Cummings' Alleged Boris Johnson Texts | GMB - Good Morning Britain

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiK2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNoP3Y9UkFOQU0yLWJJZVnSAQA?oc=5

2021-06-17 09:31:59Z
52781672576361

Novlett Robyn Williams: Metropolitan Police officer convicted of possessing child abuse video wins appeal against sacking - Sky News

A senior police officer who lost her job with the Metropolitan Police has won her appeal against dismissal after she was convicted of possessing a child abuse video on her phone.

A court was told that Novlett Robyn Williams, 56, had been sent the video on WhatsApp by her sister, co-defendant Jennifer Hodge, but she did not view the material.

Jurors at her trial were not convinced by her claim she was unaware of its presence on her phone, however, and she was sentenced in November 2019 to 200 hours of community service.

In March 2020, she was dismissed from the force with immediate effect after a special disciplinary hearing found her conviction amounted to "gross misconduct".

On Wednesday, Williams appealed against the decision to sack her and it was upheld by a panel which decided that she should have been issued with a final written warning rather than being dismissed.

The Police Superintendents' Association said the independent panel found her dismissal from the Met was "unfair" and "unreasonable" and, as a result, her appeal against losing her job was successful.

The trial at the Old Bailey heard that Williams received the video from her 57-year-old sister Hodge, who had originally been sent the clip by her long-term boyfriend, 63-year-old Dido Massivi.

More on Metropolitan Police

Metropolitan Police Superintendent Novlett Robyn Williams (centre) arrives at the Old Bailey in London, where she will be sentenced for possession of an indecent video of a child.
Image: Williams (centre) pictured arriving at the Old Bailey in London in 2019, where she was sentenced for possession of an indecent video of a child

Jurors heard that Williams had an exemplary disciplinary record and was highly regarded for her work at successive Notting Hill Carnivals and commended for her work after the Grenfell Tower disaster.

Among the commendations she received was the Queen's Police Medal for distinguished service in 2003.

Williams said after the appeal verdict: "I am extremely pleased with today's outcome and would like to thank the members of the panel for their decision, Gerard Boyle QC for continually fighting my case, and for the countless people within policing and beyond, including representatives of the Police Superintendents' Association, who have supported me throughout.

"For over a year, before and during the pandemic, I have continued to support local people by working within community initiatives. I am therefore delighted to be able to return to the work I love, serving our communities within London."

Police Superintendents' Association professional standards coordinator Victor Marshall said: "We are pleased that today's panel agreed that her dismissal was unreasonable in light of the complex circumstances surrounding her conviction and we are delighted she will be able to continue to serve the communities of London."

A Metropolitan Police statement said: "We are aware of the outcome of today's police appeals tribunal in which Novlett Robyn Williams appealed her dismissal without notice following her conviction for possessing an indecent image of a child.

"The tribunal determined Ms Williams' dismissal should be replaced with a final written warning.

"We await the full judgment. Once received, we will then consider the ruling and engage with Ms Williams' representatives accordingly."

It is expected the full judgment will be published in about a week's time.

In February, Williams' appeal against her conviction for having a child abuse video on her phone was refused by the Court of Appeal.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMinAFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9ub3ZsZXR0LXJvYnluLXdpbGxpYW1zLW1ldHJvcG9saXRhbi1wb2xpY2Utb2ZmaWNlci1jb252aWN0ZWQtb2YtcG9zc2Vzc2luZy1jaGlsZC1hYnVzZS12aWRlby13aW5zLWFwcGVhbC1hZ2FpbnN0LXNhY2tpbmctMTIzMzQ1ODnSAaABaHR0cHM6Ly9uZXdzLnNreS5jb20vc3RvcnkvYW1wL25vdmxldHQtcm9ieW4td2lsbGlhbXMtbWV0cm9wb2xpdGFuLXBvbGljZS1vZmZpY2VyLWNvbnZpY3RlZC1vZi1wb3NzZXNzaW5nLWNoaWxkLWFidXNlLXZpZGVvLXdpbnMtYXBwZWFsLWFnYWluc3Qtc2Fja2luZy0xMjMzNDU4OQ?oc=5

2021-06-17 09:17:26Z
52781673375166