Senin, 07 Juni 2021

Tory rebels 'cautiously optimistic' as they try to force PM to reverse cuts to the foreign aid budget - Sky News

Conservative Party MPs hope to force Boris Johnson to reverse cuts to the foreign aid budget in a vote this afternoon.

Thirty Tories, including former prime minister Theresa May and four former cabinet ministers, are backing a rebellion against the £4bn reduction.

They will need the support of around 45 Conservatives to defeat the government.

Andrew Mitchell MP, the former international development secretary, said they are "cautiously optimistic" of success in overturning the decision to cut aid from 0.7% of national income to 0.5%.

Fellow Conservative former minister David Davis told Sky News he is "pretty confident" that the rebels are "in winning territory".

He added that cut could "lead to tens of thousands of deaths of small children."

Shadow foreign secretary Lisa Nandy added that the government is making a "real mistake".

More from Politics

But Solicitor General Lucy Frazer said it was "important we support the effort" in the UK at this time in the pandemic.

Aid agencies have warned that the cuts will kill tens of thousands of desperate people who rely on British aid in countries such as Syria, Yemen and South Sudan, beset by a deadly combination of conflict, extreme weather and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Lisa Nandy
Image: Shadow foreign secretary Lisa Nandy called on Boris Johnson to think again and reverse his decision to temporarily cut the international aid budget

Among the programmes expected to be cut are those delivering food aid, clean water and sanitation, education for women and girls, and reproductive health.

Mr Mitchell told Sky News: "There's no question that far more than 100,000 avoidable deaths will take place as a result of these terrible cuts.

"For two decades now, Britain has been a development leader, not just putting its money where its mouth is but corralling others into the right policies to tackle these egregious levels of want and deprivation which disfigure our world.

"And frankly, to go into the G7 conference which Britain is chairing with that record, with every other G7 country maintaining or increasing their level of expenditure… I think it is an error of judgement by the government."

The amendment has been proposed to the Advanced Research and Innovation Agency Bill, an obscure piece of legislation to set up a new agency for "high-risk" science. Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle will decide whether to allow a vote on it.

It would commit the government to reinstating the 0.7% target from next year - from the funding for this agency if it is not met through alternative means.

MPs told Sky News that Chancellor Rishi Sunak had been phoning colleagues on Sunday trying to convince them not to vote for the amendment.

Britain's aid spending was cut by the chancellor last November in what was intended to be a temporary move, but without a vote in parliament. Mr Sunak told MPs at the time that keeping it at the higher level "cannot be justified to the British people".

David Davis makes fresh claims about top level of the SNP in the Commons
Image: Conservative former minister David Davis said he believes the rebels are within "winning territory".

One Tory rebel said: "There is a whiff of disrespect for the House of Commons that the government was so keen to avoid a vote on the cut. We are supposed to be a democracy."

Mr Davis told Sky News: "The simple truth is that this is not necessary, it is less than 1% of the borrowing that Rishi [Sunak] is going in for this year and as a result it doesn't make economic sense.

"And as you have heard from Lisa Nandy and others it will undermine our position - a very, very hard won position with so-called soft power, our respect in the world if you like - it will undermine that too.

"But for me, the issue is about lives, children's lives, and frankly, even if it was an unpopular policy I would still stand up for it.

"I don't want to be a member of a government or a supporter of a government that is effectively deciding to lead to tens of thousands of deaths of small children."

Just under £10bn is to be allocated to departments for foreign aid spending in 2021-22, down from more than £14bn in 2019-20.

Labour's Ms Nandy called on Prime Minister Boris Johnson to change his mind over the matter.

"He (Boris Johnson) could change his mind, he could reverse this, he could just admit that cutting global aid in the middle of a pandemic is the wrong this to do.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

The UK has slashed its aid contributions in South Sudan

"It is short-sighted, it is not in Britain's interest and he could solve this very, very quickly," she told Sky News.

Kirsty McNeill, executive director of policy and campaigns at Save the Children, said: "It's the worst possible time for the UK to be cutting back its support.

"Two thirds of people in South Sudan are food insecure and yet the UK has cut its aid there by a third.

"In Yemen, the world's worst humanitarian catastrophe, where over 90% of children are dependent on humanitarian aid, cuts to UK aid have stood at 60%."

Meanwhile, Ms Frazer also confirmed the chancellor can count on her vote on the matter as "it is really important that we spend money at home at this time of the pandemic".

"Last year we were the third largest donor globally in terms of international aid, so we really do pay a significant amount to help the world generally," she told Sky News.

"And even without the 0.7% this year, we will be investing £10bn - and that is really important.

"But we are in the middle of a pandemic and it is really important that we support the effort here as well."

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

'We have a very generous aid programme'

Polling last year suggested two-thirds of the public backed a cut to foreign aid, due to financial challenges at home.

Richard Holden, Tory MP for North West Durham, said the UK had funded the development of the life-saving AstraZeneca vaccine separately from the aid budget, which would be delivered across the world.

The prime minister will be hosting world leaders at the G7 summit in Carbis Bay, Cornwall later this week.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMigAFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS90b3J5LXJlYmVscy1jYXV0aW91c2x5LW9wdGltaXN0aWMtb2YtZm9yY2luZy1wbS10by1yZXZlcnNlLW9uLWN1dHMtdG8tdGhlLWZvcmVpZ24tYWlkLWJ1ZGdldC0xMjMyNjY5OdIBhAFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9hbXAvdG9yeS1yZWJlbHMtY2F1dGlvdXNseS1vcHRpbWlzdGljLW9mLWZvcmNpbmctcG0tdG8tcmV2ZXJzZS1vbi1jdXRzLXRvLXRoZS1mb3JlaWduLWFpZC1idWRnZXQtMTIzMjY2OTk?oc=5

2021-06-07 07:30:26Z
52781648205016

Tory rebels 'cautiously optimistic' as they try to force PM to reverse cuts to the foreign aid budget - Sky News

Conservative Party MPs hope to force Boris Johnson to reverse cuts to the foreign aid budget in a vote this afternoon.

Thirty Tories, including former prime minister Theresa May and four former cabinet ministers, are backing a rebellion against the £4bn reduction.

They will need the support of around 45 Conservatives to defeat the government.

Andrew Mitchell MP, the former international development secretary, said they are "cautiously optimistic" of success in overturning the decision to cut aid from 0.7% of national income to 0.5%.

Shadow foreign secretary Lisa Nandy said the government is making a "real mistake" over cuts to the foreign aid budget

But Solicitor General Lucy Frazer said it was "important we support the effort" in the UK at this time in the pandemic.

Aid agencies have warned that the cuts will kill tens of thousands of desperate people who rely on British aid in countries such as Syria, Yemen and South Sudan, beset by a deadly combination of conflict, extreme weather and the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.

More from Politics

Among the programmes expected to be cut are those delivering food aid, clean water and sanitation, education for women and girls, and reproductive health.

Mr Mitchell told Sky News: "There's no question that far more than 100,000 avoidable deaths will take place as a result of these terrible cuts.

"For two decades now, Britain has been a development leader, not just putting its money where its mouth is but corralling others into the right policies to tackle these egregious levels of want and deprivation which disfigure our world.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

South Sudan: Inside the school hit by UK aid cuts

"And frankly, to go into the G7 conference which Britain is chairing with that record, with every other G7 country maintaining or increasing their level of expenditure… I think it is an error of judgement by the government."

The amendment has been proposed to the Advanced Research and Innovation Agency Bill, an obscure piece of legislation to set up a new agency for "high-risk" science. Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle will decide whether to allow a vote on it.

It would commit the government to reinstating the 0.7% target from next year - from the funding for this agency if it is not met through alternative means.

MPs told Sky News that Chancellor Rishi Sunak had been phoning colleagues on Sunday trying to convince them not to vote for the amendment.

Britain's aid spending was cut by the chancellor last November in what was intended to be a temporary move, but without a vote in parliament. Mr Sunak told MPs at the time that keeping it at the higher level "cannot be justified to the British people".

One Tory rebel said: "There is a whiff of disrespect for the House of Commons that the government was so keen to avoid a vote on the cut. We are supposed to be a democracy."

Lisa Nandy
Image: Shadow foreign secretary called on Boris Johnson to think again and reverse his decision to temporarily cut the international aid budget

Just under £10bn is to be allocated to departments for foreign aid spending in 2021-22, down from more than £14bn in 2019-20.

Labour's Ms Nandy called on Boris Johnson to change his mind over the matter.

"He (Boris Johnson) could change his mind, he could reverse this, he could just admit that cutting global aid in the middle of a pandemic is the wrong this to do.

"It is short sighted, it is not in Britain's interest and he could solve this very, very quickly," she told Sky News.

Kirsty McNeill, executive director of policy and campaigns at Save the Children, said: "It's the worst possible time for the UK to be cutting back its support.

"Two thirds of people in South Sudan are food insecure and yet the UK has cut its aid there by a third.

"In Yemen, the world's worst humanitarian catastrophe, where over 90% of children are dependent on humanitarian aid, cuts to UK aid have stood at 60%."

Meanwhile, Ms Frazer also confirmed the chancellor can count on her vote on the matter as "it is really important that we spend money at home at this time of the pandemic".

"Last year we were the third largest donor globally in terms of international aid, so we really do pay a significant amount to help the world generally," she told Sky News.

"And even without the 0.7% this year, we will be investing £10bn - and that is really important.

"But we are in the middle of a pandemic and it is really important that we support the effort here as well."

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

'We have a very generous aid programme'

Some smaller aid charities have had their funding wiped out altogether and say the communities they support will struggle to survive.

Morgan Philips, co-director of The Glacier Trust, which helps coffee farmers in rural Nepal adapt to climate change, told Sky News his volunteers had spent hundreds of hours preparing an application for government funding.

They received initial approval only for the Small Charities Challenge Fund to be axed in March this year.

"Those communities are already struggling due to out migration, and the worry is the community comes to an end," he said.

"We have to talk to our NGO partners and say the funding doesn't exist anymore. What does that do to the UK's reputation abroad?"

Polling last year suggested two-thirds of the public backed a cut to foreign aid, due to financial challenges at home.

Richard Holden, Tory MP for North West Durham, said the UK had funded the development of the life-saving AstraZeneca vaccine separately from the aid budget, which would be delivered across the world.

Boris Johnson will be hosting world leaders at the G7 summit in Carbis Bay, Cornwall later this week.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMigAFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS90b3J5LXJlYmVscy1jYXV0aW91c2x5LW9wdGltaXN0aWMtb2YtZm9yY2luZy1wbS10by1yZXZlcnNlLW9uLWN1dHMtdG8tdGhlLWZvcmVpZ24tYWlkLWJ1ZGdldC0xMjMyNjY5OdIBhAFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9hbXAvdG9yeS1yZWJlbHMtY2F1dGlvdXNseS1vcHRpbWlzdGljLW9mLWZvcmNpbmctcG0tdG8tcmV2ZXJzZS1vbi1jdXRzLXRvLXRoZS1mb3JlaWduLWFpZC1idWRnZXQtMTIzMjY2OTk?oc=5

2021-06-07 05:16:15Z
52781648205016

Ex-Border Force boss warns migrant influx is ‘ongoing process’ and UK isn’t ‘coping’ - Express

Tony Smith, former director-general of Border Force, said the Home Office should "stop pretending” it can stop migrants coming into the UK. He also called for a “joint agency” system in place that includes military and police to avert the migrant crisis.

Mr Smith expressed concerns that the UK does not have the capabilities to confront the current inflow of “irregular migration”.

He told the Telegraph: "There doesn’t seem to be a long term masterplan which is about accepting that this is going to be a feature of our lives for the foreseeable future and stop pretending that we are going to be able to stop this.

"I would be pressing for a more concentrated strategic management plan based on the fact that we have not been able to stop the boats.

"That should still be our political ambition, but the plain fact is that without an agreement with the French to take them back, we are not going to be able to do instant returns back to France.

"I would feel more comfortable if, first, we accept this is an ongoing process and, second, we have a joint agency approach that could include military, police and a full range of UK assets to support the defence of our border and management of irregular migration because I don’t think we are coping."

Mr Smith’s remarks come after it was confirmed that more than 1,600 arrived illegally across the Channel in the past month.

Border officers warned that gangs of migrant smugglers are exploiting fine weather to entice more people into tiny boats to make the crossing.

Around 500 people were brought in over the final four days of last month alone.

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMieWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmV4cHJlc3MuY28udWsvbmV3cy91ay8xNDQ2MzY0L21pZ3JhbnQtY3Jpc2lzLWJvcmRlci1mb3JjZS1ib3NzLXdhcm5pbmctYXJteS1jaGFubmVsLWNyb3NzaW5ncy1wcml0aS1wYXRlbC1vbnTSAQA?oc=5

2021-06-07 05:42:00Z
52781648089482

Minggu, 06 Juni 2021

Queen 'delighted' after Harry and Meghan announce birth of baby girl - BBC News

The Queen with the Duke and Duchess of Sussex
PA Media

The Queen is "delighted" after the Duke and Duchess of Sussex announced the birth of their second child, Lilibet "Lili" Diana Mountbatten-Windsor, Buckingham Palace has said.

The Prince of Wales and the Duke of Cambridge also congratulated the couple on social media.

The Queen's 11th great-grandchild was born on Friday at a hospital in Santa Barbara, California.

Lilibet was the Queen's nickname when she was a child.

Buckingham Palace said: "The Queen, the Prince of Wales and the Duchess of Cornwall, and the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge have been informed and are delighted with the news."

Prince Charles, Prince Harry's father, and the Duchess of Cornwall tweeted: "Congratulations to Harry, Meghan and Archie on the arrival of baby Lilibet Diana. Wishing them all well at this special time."

Prince William and the Duchess and Cambridge said: "We are all delighted by the happy news of the arrival of baby Lili."

Prime Minister Boris Johnson sent his "many congratulations" to the couple and Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer welcomed the "wonderful news".

Lilibet was born at 11:40am local time, weighing 7 lbs 11oz.

She is eighth in line to the throne - meaning Prince Andrew, who was born as second in line in 1960, moves down to ninth place.

Lilibet - the Queen's family nickname - was coined when then-Princess Elizabeth was just a toddler and could not pronounce her name properly.

Her grandfather, King George V, would affectionately call her Lilibet, imitating her own attempts to say her name. It soon stuck and she became Lilibet to her family from then on.

Princess Elizabeth sitting in the horse drawn carriage with her grandparents King George V and Queen Mary in 1932
Getty Images

Prince Harry and Meghan said their baby's middle name, Diana, was chosen to honour her "beloved late grandmother", the Princess of Wales.

In a message of thanks on the couple's Archewell website, they said: "On June 4, we were blessed with the arrival of our daughter, Lili.

"She is more than we could have ever imagined, and we remain grateful for the love and prayers we've felt from across the globe.

"Thank you for your continued kindness and support during this very special time for our family."

The message adds that anyone wishing to send gifts is asked to "support or learn more about" organisations working for women and girls.

They have not released any photos of their daughter.

Prince Harry, 36, and Meghan, 39, met on a blind date and married in May 2018 in a ceremony at Windsor Castle. They welcomed their first child, Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor, a year later.

Meghan's friend, Misan Harriman, who took black-and-white photographs of the couple for their pregnancy announcement, tweeted his congratulations: "Lilibet has arrived! Congratulations to my brave friend and her lovely family!"

Harry and Meghan holding their first child when Meghan was pregnant
Misan Harriman/The Duke and Duchess of Sussex

Prince Harry has publicly reflected on his approach to parenthood recently, saying he wanted to "break the cycle" of the "pain and suffering" of his upbringing with his own children.

He and Meghan quit their roles as senior working royals in March 2020. Speaking last month, the duke said moving to the US had not been part of the plan, but he felt he had to put his family and mental health first.

As a result of the move, Lilibet is the most senior royal in the current line of succession to be born overseas.

Like her older brother Archie and most of the Queen's great-grandchildren, she is not eligible to have a royal title.

Under rules laid out more than 100 years ago, she would not be allowed to be a princess nor an HRH until Prince Charles becomes king.

In November, Meghan revealed she had a miscarriage several months earlier, writing about her "almost unbearable grief" in a deeply personal article for the New York Times.

In the piece, she said "despite the staggering commonality of [miscarriages], the conversation remains taboo, riddled with (unwarranted) shame" and went on to commend those who "bravely shared their stories", saying: "When one person speaks truth, it gives license for all of us to do the same."

Banner Image Reading Around the BBC - Blue
Footer - Blue

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiJmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLTU3MzgwMTMz0gEqaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWstNTczODAxMzMuYW1w?oc=5

2021-06-07 03:53:22Z
52781639069305

Coronavirus latest: Singapore lifts allergic reaction restrictions on jabs - Financial Times

The UK population has the highest confidence in Covid-19 vaccines, while Japan and South Korea have the lowest, according to a report based on data from an international survey of 15 countries.

The survey, conducted between March and May, showed the most common reasons for vaccine hesitancy were concerns about side effects and fears over whether jabs have been through enough testing.

Respondents’ other frequent reasons included concerns about not getting the vaccine they would prefer, and worries over whether the vaccines are effective enough.

“This global survey reveals important insight into why people might not put themselves forward to take a Covid-19 vaccine if offered,” said Ara Darzi, a professor at the Institute of Global Health Innovation at Imperial College London.

The YouGov survey recorded findings from more than 68,000 people showed that there is variation across the world but overall, confidence in vaccines is greater than 50 per cent. People in the UK were the most trusting with 87 per cent saying they trusted the vaccines, followed by Israel with 83 per cent. 

South Korea and Japan scored just 47 per cent confidence.

Vaccinated people wait in an Amazon warehouse in Torrazza Piemonte, near Turin
Vaccinated people wait in an Amazon warehouse in Torrazza Piemonte, near Turin © Stefano Guidi/Getty Images

“Our programme has been tracking people’s attitudes towards Covid-19 vaccines since November and it’s encouraging to see that trust has steadily been climbing,” said Sarah Jones, co-project lead from the Institute of Global Health Innovation.

Trust in different vaccine brands also varied, with the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine being the most trusted across all age groups in nine of the 15 countries. Respondents were also invited to record their thoughts about the AstraZeneca/Oxford, Moderna, Sinopharm and Sputnik V jabs.

Americans showed the least trust in specific brands and had the highest proportion of people across all ages who said they didn’t trust any of them.

In the UK the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine was the most trusted by people aged under 65 in March, although confidence has fallen over time across all age groups. 

In most other countries trust in the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine was low, as with the Sputnik V and Sinopharm vaccines. 

The surveys were conducted in Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Norway, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, the UK and the US. 

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiP2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZ0LmNvbS9jb250ZW50LzQwYzYzNTM3LTZiMDItNDJhMy1iNzJhLTQ5ODQ1NzA3NjMxOdIBAA?oc=5

2021-06-07 02:31:43Z
52781645263109

Coronavirus latest: Singapore lifts allergic reaction restrictions on jabs - Financial Times

The UK population has the highest confidence in Covid-19 vaccines, while Japan and South Korea have the lowest, according to a report based on data from an international survey of 15 countries.

The survey, conducted between March and May, showed the most common reasons for vaccine hesitancy were concerns about side effects and fears over whether jabs have been through enough testing.

Respondents’ other frequent reasons included concerns about not getting the vaccine they would prefer, and worries over whether the vaccines are effective enough.

“This global survey reveals important insight into why people might not put themselves forward to take a Covid-19 vaccine if offered,” said Ara Darzi, a professor at the Institute of Global Health Innovation at Imperial College London.

The YouGov survey recorded findings from more than 68,000 people showed that there is variation across the world but overall, confidence in vaccines is greater than 50 per cent. People in the UK were the most trusting with 87 per cent saying they trusted the vaccines, followed by Israel with 83 per cent. 

South Korea and Japan scored just 47 per cent confidence.

Vaccinated people wait in an Amazon warehouse in Torrazza Piemonte, near Turin
Vaccinated people wait in an Amazon warehouse in Torrazza Piemonte, near Turin © Stefano Guidi/Getty Images

“Our programme has been tracking people’s attitudes towards Covid-19 vaccines since November and it’s encouraging to see that trust has steadily been climbing,” said Sarah Jones, co-project lead from the Institute of Global Health Innovation.

Trust in different vaccine brands also varied, with the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine being the most trusted across all age groups in nine of the 15 countries. Respondents were also invited to record their thoughts about the AstraZeneca/Oxford, Moderna, Sinopharm and Sputnik V jabs.

Americans showed the least trust in specific brands and had the highest proportion of people across all ages who said they didn’t trust any of them.

In the UK the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine was the most trusted by people aged under 65 in March, although confidence has fallen over time across all age groups. 

In most other countries trust in the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine was low, as with the Sputnik V and Sinopharm vaccines. 

The surveys were conducted in Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Norway, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, the UK and the US. 

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiP2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZ0LmNvbS9jb250ZW50LzQwYzYzNTM3LTZiMDItNDJhMy1iNzJhLTQ5ODQ1NzA3NjMxOdIBAA?oc=5

2021-06-07 02:15:21Z
52781645263109

Coronavirus latest: Singapore lifts allergic reaction restrictions on jabs - Financial Times

The UK population has the highest confidence in Covid-19 vaccines, while Japan and South Korea have the lowest, according to a report based on data from an international survey of 15 countries.

The survey, conducted between March and May, showed the most common reasons for vaccine hesitancy were concerns about side effects and fears over whether jabs have been through enough testing.

Respondents’ other frequent reasons included concerns about not getting the vaccine they would prefer, and worries over whether the vaccines are effective enough.

“This global survey reveals important insight into why people might not put themselves forward to take a Covid-19 vaccine if offered,” said Ara Darzi, a professor at the Institute of Global Health Innovation at Imperial College London.

The YouGov survey recorded findings from more than 68,000 people showed that there is variation across the world but overall, confidence in vaccines is greater than 50 per cent. People in the UK were the most trusting with 87 per cent saying they trusted the vaccines, followed by Israel with 83 per cent. 

South Korea and Japan scored just 47 per cent confidence.

Vaccinated people wait in an Amazon warehouse in Torrazza Piemonte, near Turin
Vaccinated people wait in an Amazon warehouse in Torrazza Piemonte, near Turin © Stefano Guidi/Getty Images

“Our programme has been tracking people’s attitudes towards Covid-19 vaccines since November and it’s encouraging to see that trust has steadily been climbing,” said Sarah Jones, co-project lead from the Institute of Global Health Innovation.

Trust in different vaccine brands also varied, with the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine being the most trusted across all age groups in nine of the 15 countries. Respondents were also invited to record their thoughts about the AstraZeneca/Oxford, Moderna, Sinopharm and Sputnik V jabs.

Americans showed the least trust in specific brands and had the highest proportion of people across all ages who said they didn’t trust any of them.

In the UK the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine was the most trusted by people aged under 65 in March, although confidence has fallen over time across all age groups. 

In most other countries trust in the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine was low, as with the Sputnik V and Sinopharm vaccines. 

The surveys were conducted in Australia, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Norway, Singapore, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, the UK and the US. 

Adblock test (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiP2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZ0LmNvbS9jb250ZW50LzQwYzYzNTM3LTZiMDItNDJhMy1iNzJhLTQ5ODQ1NzA3NjMxOdIBAA?oc=5

2021-06-07 01:46:17Z
52781645263109