Jumat, 19 Maret 2021

Covid: UK death rate 'no longer Europe's worst' by winter - BBC News

Royal London Hospital, January 2021
Getty Images

The UK death rate during the second wave of the pandemic was not the worst in Europe - but it remained one of the 10 worst-affected countries.

By the end of June 2020, the UK had the highest excess mortality in Europe, according to figures from the ONS.

But by December it had been overtaken by Poland, Spain, Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic and Slovenia.

Nevertheless, the UK had one of the highest excess death rates among people under the age of 65 in 2020 at 7.7%.

Excess mortality is the number of deaths by any cause that happen over and above the average for that time of year.

The UK saw 7% more deaths than normally expected during 2020. Within the UK, England's death rate was 8% above expected levels across the whole year, Scotland's was 6%, Northern Ireland 5% and Wales 4%.

The Office for National Statistics figures cover up to 18 December so do not include deaths from this year when the UK and the rest of Europe experienced a third wave of coronavirus, leading to thousands of Covid-19 deaths. About a third of the UK's Covid deaths have happened since then.

Only Bulgaria recorded a higher rate for under-65s - 12.3% - among the countries analysed by the ONS.

Dr Annie Campbell, from the ONS, said the figures showed the pandemic had not "exclusively" affected the oldest age groups in the UK.

For deaths among all age groups Poland ended 2020 with the highest rate (11.6% above the five-year average), followed by Spain (10.6%) and Belgium (9.7%).

England ranked seventh on this list (7.8%) with the UK eighth (7.2%).

All-cause mortality allows countries to be compared more easily, even if they record Covid-19 deaths in different ways. It also reflects the indirect impact of the pandemic, such as deaths from other causes that might be related to delayed access to treatment.

The figures also take account of the average age of a country's population and the average level of deaths in recent years.

Banner image reading 'more about coronavirus'
Banner

Meanwhile, separate ONS figures suggest infection levels have continued to decrease across England and Wales but have "levelled off" in Northern Ireland and increased in Scotland.

An estimated one in 335 people in the UK had Covid-19 in the week to 13 March, according to the figures.

The ONS results, based on tests from people whether or not they had symptoms, also show:

  • In England about one in 340 people was estimated to have the virus, down from one in 270 the previous week
  • In Wales the figure was one in 430, down from one in 365
  • In Northern Ireland it was one in 315, broadly similar to one in 310 the previous week
  • In Scotland it was one in 275 - up from one in 320.

The falls in England were driven by falls in the West Midlands, the East, South West and London, the ONS said. The rest of England has seen little change in infection rates and there are hints of an increase in the East Midlands.

The ONS said infections among secondary aged children had decreased and "appear to be levelling" for primary aged children.

However, it said the figures were from the first week since schools returned in England and therefore it was too early to say whether this had influenced infection rates.

Graph showing UK virus levels falling according to the Office for National Statistics

On Thursday, the UK recorded 6,303 new cases and 95 deaths within 28 days of a positive test.

It comes as Prime Minister Boris Johnson is to receive his first dose of the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine after reassuring the public it was safe.

Several European countries are to resume using the AstraZeneca jab after the European Medicines Agency confirmed it was "safe and effective".

The regulator reviewed the vaccine amid fears about blood clots, but said it was "not associated" with an increased risk of clots and the benefits outweighed any risks.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiKmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL2hlYWx0aC01NjQ1NjMxMtIBLmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL2FtcC9oZWFsdGgtNTY0NTYzMTI?oc=5

2021-03-19 13:14:56Z
52781445209064

Covid vaccine: PM to have AstraZeneca jab as he urges public to do the same - BBC News

Boris Johnson at a Covid vaccination clinic
PA Media

The prime minister is to receive his first dose of the Oxford-AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine after reassuring the public it was "safe".

Boris Johnson, 56, has urged people to get inoculated and said England's roadmap out of lockdown was "on track".

He said there was "no change" to the plan despite a drop in vaccine supply.

Several European countries are to resume using the AstraZeneca jab after the European Medicines Agency (EMA) confirmed it was "safe and effective".

The regulator reviewed the vaccine amid fears about blood clots, but said it was "not associated" with a higher risk and the benefits outweighed any risks.

Mr Johnson told a Downing Street conference on Thursday that the AstraZeneca jab was safe but "the thing that isn't safe is catching Covid, which is why it is so important that we all get our jabs as soon as our turn comes".

The prime minister was himself treated in hospital for Covid-19 in April 2020 during the first wave of the pandemic.

"The way to ensure this [lockdown easing] happens is to get that jab when your turn comes, so let's get the jab done," he said.

Prof Chris Whitty, chief medical officer for England, said there were "anecdotal reports" of small numbers of people not turning up for vaccine appointments following the controversy over the AstraZeneca jab in Europe.

But he said he expected many of those would decide to get the jab after "a pause for thought", adding that Covid was still a "very dangerous disease".

"People dying, people getting significant blood clotting problems, that's one of the risks of Covid, people having long-term physical and mental effects from Covid," he said.

Mr Johnson said England's progress towards leaving restrictions on daily life was "unchecked" by vaccine supply issues, where fewer doses have arrived from India than initially expected.

There were often delays with vaccine rollout programmes, he said, and he stressed the Indian government had not stopped any exports.

Prof Neil Ferguson, from Imperial College London, said while the delay was "disappointing" he did not think it would have "an enormous effect" on the rollout.

However, he warned the UK needed to keep variants of concern "at bay" until it could update vaccines and roll them out to the whole population.

Prof Ferguson, who is a member of the government's SPI-M modelling group, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme there should be particular concern about cases being imported from France, where infection levels are increasing.

He added that 5-10% of cases in France were the South African variant, which is of concern because it could be more resistant to current vaccines.

But Prof Ferguson suggested that adding France to the "red list" of countries, from which arrivals are required to quarantine in a hotel, would not be "practical" given the amount of essential trade between the UK and France.

Instead he said "a more bespoke arrangement" to mitigate the risks, perhaps including testing of arrivals, would be needed.

Culture Secretary Oliver Dowden said rising infection rates in Europe should act as a "wake-up call" and the travel red list was kept under "regular review".

Banner image reading 'more about coronavirus'
Banner

The European medical regulator had reviewed the AstraZeneca jab after 13 countries in Europe suspended its use over fears about blood clots in a very small number of patients.

France, Germany and Italy, along with Cyprus, Latvia and Lithuania, are to resume use of the jab on Friday while Spain, Portugal and the Netherlands will do so next week.

But Norway, Sweden and Denmark have said they will continue to pause the use of the AstraZeneca vaccine while they conduct their own independent reviews.

Like his UK counterpart, French Prime Minister Jean Castex will receive the AstraZeneca vaccine in an effort to sway a doubtful French public.

Sir Kent Woods, former chairman of the EMA, told BBC Breakfast the pause of the rollout of the AstraZeneca jab in some European countries was "unfortunate" because it could damage public confidence.

Prof Andrew Pollard, director of the Oxford vaccine group, said the EMA findings would help "rebuild confidence" and it was "reassuring" that safety monitoring was taking place.

In the UK, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) also concluded that any link between the jab and clots was unproven.

The MHRA and the EMA say people can have confidence in the vaccine's benefits and should get immunised but anyone with a headache lasting more than four days after vaccination should seek medical advice, as a precaution.

The same advice applies if someone develops unusual bruising.

That is because the regulators have received a very small number of reports of an extremely rare form of blood clot occurring in the brain.

It is this type of clot that triggered some European countries to pause rollout of the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine.

In the UK, five cases of cerebral sinus vein thrombosis (CSVT), among 11 million people who have received the vaccine, occurred in men aged between 19 and 59. One of these was fatal.

The EMA has received an additional 13 reports of CSVT.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has called on countries to continue using the vaccine, and is due to release the results of its own review into the vaccine's safety later on Friday.

Priority group list

Meanwhile, the UK saw 7% more deaths than would be expected in 2020 based on the previous five years, according to new figures from the Office for National Statistics covering up to mid-December.

It experienced one of the worst death rates in Europe in the first half of 2020 but has since been overtaken by Poland, Spain, Belgium, Bulgaria, the Czech Republic and Slovenia.

Banner Image Reading Around the BBC - Blue
Footer - Blue
Banner saying 'Get in touch'

What has been your experience of vaccination? Email haveyoursay@bbc.co.uk.

Or use this form to get in touch:

If you are reading this page and can't see the form you will need to visit the mobile version of the BBC website to submit your comment or send it via email to HaveYourSay@bbc.co.uk. Please include your name, age and location with any comment you send in.

Bottom line for Get in touch request

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiJmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLTU2NDUyNDEy0gEqaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvYW1wL3VrLTU2NDUyNDEy?oc=5

2021-03-19 08:49:01Z
52781444011411

Salmond inquiry: New details emerge as committee finds Sturgeon 'misled parliament' - Sky News

Sky News can reveal further details contained in a report that found Scotland's First Minister Nicola Sturgeon misled parliament.

Holyrood's harassment committee also concluded that it finds it "hard to believe" she didn't know of concerns around Alex Salmond's behaviour before November 2017.

And committee members have included a passage in their report to say they are "concerned" at the length of time it took, in the wake of harassment complaints against Mr Salmond, for Ms Sturgeon to tell her top civil servant about contact with him on the matter.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sturgeon's 'pain and regret' over Salmond case

The harassment committee has reached its conclusions by a majority vote ahead of the publication of its final report next week.

Members have decided that Scotland's first minister misled the committee itself and, as such, misled parliament and potentially breached the ministerial code of conduct.

It has increased pressure on Ms Sturgeon to step down. Her opponents have repeatedly levelled the accusation that, in misleading parliament, she breached the ministerial code.

The code dictates that any minister found to knowingly be in breach should offer their resignation.

More from Alex Salmond

However, Sky News understands that the word "knowingly" was not included in the text agreed by the committee.

Its members decided by a majority that they were misled by the first minister.

She appeared before them earlier this month to give oral evidence and, before that, made a written submission in which she insisted she had not offered to intervene in a government investigation into harassment complaints made against her predecessor.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

'Scotland's leadership has failed'

However, Mr Salmond insisted that she had, during a meeting at her house on 2 April 2018. His account was corroborated by Duncan Hamilton QC, his legal adviser, who was present at the meeting and wrote to the committee that Ms Sturgeon had said: "If it comes to it, I will intervene."

Speaking to Sky News last night, Ms Sturgeon said: "I stand by all of the evidence I gave to the committee, all eight hours' worth of evidence.

"What's been clear is that opposition members of this committee made their minds up about me before I muttered a single word of evidence, their public comments have made that clear.

"So this leak from the committee - very partisan leak - tonight before they've finalised the report is not that surprising."

The committee's finding, passed by a majority, reads:

"The committee notes there is a fundamental contradiction in the evidence in relation to whether, at the meeting on the 2nd April 2018, the first minister did or did not agree to intervene.

"Taking account of the competing versions of the event, the committee believes that she did in fact leave Alex Salmond with the impression that she would, if necessary, intervene.

"This is confirmed by Duncan Hamilton, who was also at the meeting. Her written evidence is, therefore, an inaccurate account of what happened and she has misled the committee on this matter.

"This is a potential breach of the ministerial code under the terms of section 1.3 (c)."

Ms Sturgeon told the Scottish parliament that she first learned of complaints against Mr Salmond at the 2 April 2018 meeting. Sky News subsequently revealed an account by Geoff Aberdein, Mr Salmond's former chief of staff, of a meeting four days earlier on 29 March 2018 that suggested the complaints were discussed then.

Scottish First Minister Nicola Sturgeon
Image: Ms Sturgeon misled the Scottish parliament in her evidence about the investigation into Mr Salmond (below), a committee has found
Ex-leader of the SNP Alex Salmond

On that contradiction the committee found, by majority, that:

"The first minister's failure to recollect the meeting (of the 29th March) and her account is at odds with Alex Salmond.

"The committee accepts there may be differing recollections of this meeting.

"It's not in a position to take a view on whether the first minister's version or Geoff Aberdein's is more persuasive. It notes that the former first minister has the benefit of confirmation."

On the first minister's contact with her predecessor in the wake of complaints being made against him by two female civil servants, the Holyrood committee was "concerned".

Ms Sturgeon had two phone calls and three meetings with Mr Salmond in 2018 after the complaints had been received. Having met Mr Salmond initially on 2 April 2018, it wasn't until June of that year that she told her government's permanent secretary about the contact.

The passage voted by majority in the committee's report reads:

"The committee is concerned it took until the 6th June 2018 for the first minister to inform the permanent secretary of the fact of meetings (with Alex Salmond).

"Given the sensitivity, the committee believes it was inappropriate for the first minister to continue to meet (Alex Salmond) on this topic.

"She should have made the permanent secretary aware as soon as possible after the 2nd April 2018 meeting, at which point she should have confirmed she would cease contact with Alex Salmond."

Committee members were given evidence during their inquiry from civil service unions who expressed concerns of bullying behaviour in 2010 around the office of the then first minister, Mr Salmond.

Their findings state:

"The committee finds it hard to believe that the first minister had no knowledge of any concerns about inappropriate behaviour on the part of Alex Salmond before November 2017.

"If she did have such knowledge, then she should have acted upon it. If she did have such knowledge, she has misled the committee."

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

SNP MP: Salmond inquiry 'horrendous'

Holyrood's harassment committee, comprising 4 SNP MSPs and five members of the opposition, is due to publish its findings, in full, early next week.

Their inquiry has been looking into the Scottish government's mishandling of a 2018 investigation of harassment complaints against Mr Salmond.

He challenged its legality and a court ruled that it was "unlawful" and "tainted by apparent bias". Mr Salmond was subsequently acquitted of sexual assault charges at a criminal trial in March 2020.

The remit of the Holyrood committee has been to consider and report on the actions of the first minister, Scottish government officials and special advisers.

It has examined the development of the government's policy regarding harassment, events surrounding Mr Salmond's judicial review and the handling of complaints as well as matters concerning the ministerial code.

Ms Sturgeon is facing a separate inquiry into whether she breached the ministerial code.

James Hamilton, Ireland's former director of public prosecutions, is due to publish the findings of his investigation in the coming days.

Mr Hamilton is an independent adviser to the Scottish government on the code and has been conducting enquiries following Ms Sturgeon's self-referral amidst questions surrounding what she knew, and when.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMidGh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L3NhbG1vbmQtaW5xdWlyeS1uZXctZGV0YWlscy1lbWVyZ2UtYXMtY29tbWl0dGVlLWZpbmRzLXN0dXJnZW9uLW1pc2xlZC1wYXJsaWFtZW50LTEyMjUwMzA30gF4aHR0cHM6Ly9uZXdzLnNreS5jb20vc3RvcnkvYW1wL3NhbG1vbmQtaW5xdWlyeS1uZXctZGV0YWlscy1lbWVyZ2UtYXMtY29tbWl0dGVlLWZpbmRzLXN0dXJnZW9uLW1pc2xlZC1wYXJsaWFtZW50LTEyMjUwMzA3?oc=5

2021-03-19 08:13:04Z
52781442105037

Scotland's papers: Sturgeon 'under pressure' over Salmond evidence - BBC News

1px transparent line
The Herald
i newspaper
scotsman
Telegraph
Metro
Daily Express
daily record
the sun
daily mail
times
press and journal
national
Daily Star
Courier
Dundee Evening Telegraph
Edinburgh News
EveningExpress

Related Internet Links

The BBC is not responsible for the content of external sites.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXNjb3RsYW5kLTU2NDUyMDc20gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvYW1wL3VrLXNjb3RsYW5kLTU2NDUyMDc2?oc=5

2021-03-19 08:05:29Z
52781442105037

Kamis, 18 Maret 2021

Friday's national newspaper front pages | UK News - sky.com

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

  1. Friday's national newspaper front pages | UK News  sky.com
  2. As it happened: Covid: No change to roadmap out of lockdown, Johnson says  BBC News
  3. Boris Johnson vows 'roadmap to freedom' will NOT be delayed despite AstraZeneca jab supply fears  The Sun
  4. The Guardian view on a UK Covid inquiry: now is the time  The Guardian
  5. Johnson wants to move on from Covid – 125,000 deaths shows why we need an inquiry  The Guardian
  6. View Full coverage on Google News

https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiSmh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2ZyaWRheXMtbmF0aW9uYWwtbmV3c3BhcGVyLWZyb250LXBhZ2VzLTEyMjUwMTk10gEA?oc=5

2021-03-18 22:22:57Z
52781444011411

Sturgeon 'misled parliament' over role in Salmond investigation, committee finds - Sky News

A Scottish parliamentary committee has concluded that First Minister Nicola Sturgeon misled parliament.

Sky News understands that Holyrood's harassment committee has reached the conclusion by a majority vote ahead of the publication of its final report.

Members have decided that Ms Sturgeon misled the committee itself and, as such, misled parliament and potentially breached the ministerial code of conduct.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Sturgeon's 'pain and regret' over Salmond case

It will significantly increase pressure on Ms Sturgeon to step down. Her opponents have repeatedly levelled the accusation that, in misleading parliament, she breached the ministerial code of conduct.

It dictates that any minister found to knowingly be in breach should offer their resignation.

Sky News understands that the word "knowingly" was not included in the text agreed by the committee.

Its members decided by a majority that it was misled by evidence submitted to them by the first minister.

More from Alex Salmond

She appeared before them earlier this month to give oral evidence and, before that, made a written submission in which she insisted she had not offered to intervene in a Scottish government investigation into harassment complaints made against her predecessor, Alex Salmond.

However, Mr Salmond insisted that she had made such an offer during a meeting at her house on 2 April 2018.

Mr Salmond's account was confirmed by Duncan Hamilton QC, his legal adviser, who was present at the meeting and wrote to the committee that Ms Sturgeon had said: "If it comes to it, I will intervene."

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

'Scotland's leadership has failed'

The committee's finding, passed by a majority, reads:

"The committee notes there is a fundamental contradiction in the evidence in relation to whether, at the meeting on the 2nd April 2018, the First Minister did or did not agree to intervene.

"Taking account of the competing versions of the event, the committee believes that she did in fact leave Alex Salmond with the impression that she would, if necessary, intervene.

"This is corroborated by Duncan Hamilton, who was also at the meeting. Her written evidence is, therefore, an inaccurate account of what happened and she has misled the committee on this matter.

"This is a potential breach of the ministerial code under the terms of section 1.3 (c)."

Scottish first minister Nicola Sturgeon
Image: Ms Sturgeon misled the Scottish parliament in her evidence about the investigation into Mr Salmond (below), a committee has found
Alex Salmond

Holyrood's harassment committee, comprising of four SNP MSPs and five members of the opposition, is due to publish its findings, in full, early next week.

Their inquiry has been looking into the Scottish government's mishandling of a 2018 investigation of harassment complaints against Mr Salmond.

He challenged its legality and a court ruled that it was "unlawful" and "tainted by apparent bias". Mr Salmond was subsequently acquitted of sexual assault charges at a criminal trial in March 2020.

The remit of the Holyrood committee has been to consider and report on the actions of the first minister, Scottish government officials, and special advisers.

It has examined the development of the government's policy regarding harassment, events surrounding Mr Salmond's judicial review and the handling of complaints, as well as matters concerning the ministerial code.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

SNP MP: Salmond inquiry 'horrendous'

Ms Sturgeon is facing a separate inquiry into whether she breached the ministerial code.

James Hamilton, Ireland's former director of public prosecutions, is due to publish the findings of his investigation in the coming days.

Mr Hamilton is an independent adviser to the Scottish government on the code and has been conducting enquiries following Ms Sturgeon's self-referral amidst questions surrounding what she knew, and when.

A spokesman for the First Minister said: "The First Minister told the truth to the committee in eight hours of evidence, and stands by that evidence.

"It is clear from past public statements that opposition members of this committee had prejudged the First Minister at the outset of the inquiry and before hearing a word of her evidence, so this partisan and selective briefing - before the committee has actually published its final report - is hardly surprising.

"The question of the First Minister's adherence to the ministerial code is being considered independently by James Hamilton, and we expect to receive and publish his report soon."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMicWh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L3N0dXJnZW9uLW1pc2xlZC1wYXJsaWFtZW50LW92ZXItcm9sZS1pbi1zYWxtb25kLWludmVzdGlnYXRpb24tY29tbWl0dGVlLWZpbmRzLTEyMjQ5ODE30gF1aHR0cHM6Ly9uZXdzLnNreS5jb20vc3RvcnkvYW1wL3N0dXJnZW9uLW1pc2xlZC1wYXJsaWFtZW50LW92ZXItcm9sZS1pbi1zYWxtb25kLWludmVzdGlnYXRpb24tY29tbWl0dGVlLWZpbmRzLTEyMjQ5ODE3?oc=5

2021-03-18 19:41:15Z
52781442105037

BREAKING: PM says 'no change to the roadmap' - Sky News

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiK2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNoP3Y9WkRGMUhVdlpOdVHSAQA?oc=5

2021-03-18 17:50:43Z
52781438959839