Rabu, 17 Maret 2021

Stuart Lubbock: Murder arrest over death in Michael Barrymore pool - BBC News

Stuart Lubbock
.

A 50-year-old man has been arrested on suspicion of the indecent assault and murder of Stuart Lubbock at the home of Michael Barrymore.

Mr Lubbock, 31, was found dead in the TV presenter's pool in Roydon, Essex, in March 2001.

The man was arrested in Cheshire and is being questioned in custody, Essex Police said.

Mr Lubbock had been attending a party at the home of Mr Barrymore, 68, with eight other people.

A post-mortem examination found Mr Lubbock had suffered "horrific" injuries prior to his death, police said.

Alcohol, ecstasy and cocaine were found in his bloodstream.

No-one has ever been charged with any offence in relation to the death.

Terry Lubbock
PA Media

Mr Lubbock, a butcher from Harlow, was described by neighbours at the time of his death as a "pleasant, sociable" man.

Reacting to news of the arrest, Mr Lubbock's father Terry said: "There is just so much going on in my head. I can't get my head around it.

"Of course I'm happy. Of course this is good news. But it's been 20 years. This has nearly killed me."

In February, the 76-year-old from Harlow said he had only months to live after being diagnosed with terminal cancer.

"All I've been living for is to get justice for Stuart," he said.

Michael Barrymore
PA Media

Mr Barrymore and two other men were arrested in 2007 on suspicion of sexual assault and murder, but were later released without charge.

The TV personality, who was known for shows including Strike It Lucky, has always denied involvement in the death.

Speaking last year, he said: "I have had nothing to do with this whatsoever and yet I keep getting bashed and bullied by the media."

Michael Barrymore's Essex home

An inquest into Mr Lubbock's death, in 2002, recorded an open verdict.

Three years ago, the then-attorney general, Jeremy Wright, refused to let Terry Lubbock make a High Court application for a second inquest.

In 2009, the police watchdog published the findings of a review of the investigation into Mr Lubbock's death, concluding that officers missed crucial evidence and did not ensure vital forensic tests were completed until six years later.

Police relaunched an appeal for information about Mr Lubbock's death in February last year.

The appeal coincided with the broadcast of a Channel 4 documentary about the death.

presentational grey line

Timeline: Investigation into Stuart Lubbock's death

  • March 2001: Stuart Lubbock is found dead at Michael Barrymore's home
  • September 2002: An inquest in Epping, Essex, records an open verdict on his death
  • April 2006: Police announce they are reviewing the 31-year-old's death as part of "routine" procedure
  • June 2007: Mr Barrymore and two other men are arrested and questioned on suspicion of seriously sexually assaulting and murdering Mr Lubbock. They are later released without charge
  • February 2009: The Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) publishes the findings of a review of the police investigation, concluding officers missed crucial evidence
  • February 2020: A fresh police appeal coincides with a Channel 4 documentary
  • 17 March 2021: Essex Police announces a man, 50, has been arrested in Cheshire on suspicion of Mr Lubbock's murder and indecent assault
presentational grey line

Find BBC News: East of England on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter. If you have a story suggestion email eastofenglandnews@bbc.co.uk

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiNGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLWVuZ2xhbmQtZXNzZXgtNTY0Mjc3MTDSAThodHRwczovL3d3dy5iYmMuY28udWsvbmV3cy9hbXAvdWstZW5nbGFuZC1lc3NleC01NjQyNzcxMA?oc=5

2021-03-17 11:17:43Z
52781440253939

Everyone aged 50 or over in England can now book a coronavirus vaccination - Sky News

Everyone aged 50 and over in England is now being invited to book a coronavirus vaccination on the NHS website.

It comes after the government announced last month that all over-50s should be offered a coronavirus vaccine by May.

The government is aiming to offer a vaccine to all those in the first nine priority groups by then.

Live COVID updates from the UK and around the world

This includes older care home residents and staff, everyone over 70, all front line NHS and care staff, those who are clinically extremely vulnerable, the over-65s, all those over 16 with underlying health conditions, the over-60s, over-55s and now the over-50s.

The Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) has already recommended that the next phase of COVID vaccinations should continue to prioritise people by age and not their occupation to avoid slowing down the rollout.

People aged 40-49 will be the next in line to get a vaccine after all vulnerable groups and the over-50s are covered.

More from Covid

The committee said this would provide "the greatest benefit in the shortest time".

It added that prioritising occupational groups such as teachers and police could make the rollout more complex and could potentially slow the vaccination programme overall, leaving some vulnerable people at higher risk for longer.

The priority order of vaccinations for phase two will be:

• Everyone aged between 40 and 49
• Everyone aged between 30 and 39
• Everyone aged between 18 and 29

Nearly 25 million people across the UK had received their first doses of a COVID-19 vaccine by Tuesday.

The UK also carried out 53,366 second vaccination jabs on Monday, meaning 1,663,646 people have had a full course of a drug.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson has set the target of vaccinating all UK adults by the end of July.

England is eyeing a return of the rule of six and the resumption of organised sports on 29 March.

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

What are the risks and benefits of vaccines?

Elsewhere, Scotland's First Minister Nicola Sturgeon has said the country's "stay at home" order would be replaced with a "stay local" message on 2 April.

It follows a similar move from the Welsh First Minister Mark Drakeford, with the "stay at home" order changed over the past weekend.

Northern Ireland's lockdown restrictions will be reviewed later this week.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMibmh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2V2ZXJ5b25lLWFnZWQtNTAtb3Itb3Zlci1pbi1lbmdsYW5kLWNhbi1ub3ctYm9vay1hLWNvcm9uYXZpcnVzLXZhY2NpbmF0aW9uLTEyMjQ4NTMz0gFyaHR0cHM6Ly9uZXdzLnNreS5jb20vc3RvcnkvYW1wL2V2ZXJ5b25lLWFnZWQtNTAtb3Itb3Zlci1pbi1lbmdsYW5kLWNhbi1ub3ctYm9vay1hLWNvcm9uYXZpcnVzLXZhY2NpbmF0aW9uLTEyMjQ4NTMz?oc=5

2021-03-17 10:52:30Z
52781440445094

Team Meghan cry double standards in new feud with Royals about couple's revelations to Gayle King - Daily Mail

Team Meghan cry double standards in new feud with Royals about couple's revelations to Gayle King: Omid Scobie equates host's revelation of 'unproductive' family peace talks with William and Charles to briefings by palace sources

  • Sussexes told US TV presenter Gayle King that private talks were 'not productive' and she told her viewers
  • The couple shared details of a phone call with Prince Charles and Prince William and claims of 'evidence'
  • Windsors and senior officials at Buckingham Palace see it as betrayal of trust - Sussexes' friends say it's not 
  • Omid Scobie tweeted: 'Bit confused here, so just want to get this new royal protocol correct. It’s okay when info is leaked to the papers via a palace source but not when Gayle King shares it on TV? Righty-ho then'.
Advertisement

Meghan and Harry's friend has accused the media and Royal aides of double standards after it was reported that the Palace is believed to be unhappy with the couple's decision to reveal the details of their peace talks to US TV host Gayle King.

Omid Scobie said he was 'confused' by criticism of the couple and claimed a 'new royal protocol' had been concocted after the Palace said it would not provide 'running commentary on private conversations'.

The Sussexes had insisted that their explosive interview with Oprah Winfrey would be their 'final word' on royal affairs - but warfare erupted again after the couple told CBS This Morning host Gayle that Harry had finally spoken to his father and brother.  

Hours later, Miss King disclosed on American TV that the talks 'were not productive'. The breakfast show host also suggested that Meghan was unhappy no one in the Royal Family had thought to telephone her. 

And, in a thinly-veiled threat, the presenter said the duchess had 'documents to back up everything she said on Oprah's interview', just as the Queen was seeing her husband Prince Philip for the first time in a month after he was released from hospital.

Omid Scobie, co-author of the Sussexes biography Finding Freedom and a close ally of the couple, said today he was 'confused' by the criticism they have received as their friends again came out to back them as royal insiders accused Harry and Meghan of a betrayal of trust.

Mr Scobie tweeted: 'Bit confused here, so just want to get this new royal protocol correct. It’s okay when info is leaked to the papers via a palace source but not when Gayle King shares it on TV? Righty-ho then'.

But critics have accused the Sussexes of double standards, with one replying to Mr Scobie's tweet: 'The point is that private phone calls are openly discussed with personal media friends. This is the very reason Meghan cut off her family'. 

Prince William's wife Kate put on a brave face this morning amid more turmoil caused by her brother-in-law and sister-in-law's interview with Oprah. 

Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge driving in West London today as it emerged that Prince Harry has spoken to his brother William and father Charles

Catherine, Duchess of Cambridge driving in West London today as it emerged that Prince Harry has spoken to his brother William and father Charles

Harry and Meghan have prompted fresh outrage after sharing private conversations with Prince Charles and Prince William with US journalist Gayle King.
Speaking on CBS This Morning, Gayle King said: 'Meghan has documents to back up everything that she said on Oprah’s interview. Everything'

Harry and Meghan have prompted fresh outrage after sharing private conversations with Prince Charles and Prince William with US journalist Gayle King. Speaking on CBS This Morning, Miss King said: 'Meghan has documents to back up everything that she said on Oprah's interview. Everything'

Omid Scobie, a journalist friend of the couple, defended their decision to brief another ally in the media about talks with Harry's family

Omid Scobie, a journalist friend of the couple, defended their decision to brief another ally in the media about talks with Harry's family

HOW GAYLE STIRRED UP A STORM

'Harry has talked to his brother and he has talked to his father too. The word I was given was that those conversations were not productive but they are glad that they have at least started a conversation.

What is still upsetting to them is that the Palace keeps saying they want to work it out privately, but yet they believe these false stories are coming out that are very disparaging against Meghan still.

No one in the Royal Family has talked to Meghan yet at this particular time.

It's frustrating for them to see that it's a racial conversation about the Royal Family when all they wanted all along was for the royals to intervene and tell the Press to stop with the unfair, inaccurate, false stories that definitely have a racial slant.

They both want to move forward with this and they both want healing in this family. At the end of the day, that is Harry's family.

Meghan has documents to back up everything that she said on Oprah's interview. Everything.

Anyone who's worked with her [Meghan] will tell you exactly who she is, she's really a sweet caring person.

No one has acknowledged 'Houston, we have a problem here'. That's really all they [Harry and Meghan] want. They want a conversation.'

 

Advertisement

Another wrote: 'Omid - I don’t think it was a very clever savvy move to disclose something like this via Gayle King. It’s a poor move which benefits no one'. 

Miss King, who attended Meghan's baby shower in New York in 2019 and is Miss Winfrey's closest friend, decided to speak out on her prime-time morning show on CBS, the same channel that broadcast the Oprah interview. 

The fact the Sussexes chose to reveal sensitive discussions between senior members of the Royal Family met with an icy response from Buckingham Palace.

'None of the households – the Queen, the Prince of Wales and the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge – will be giving a running commentary on private conversations,' said a senior royal source.

It was clear, however, that both the Windsors and senior officials see it as a severe betrayal of trust and unhelpful to attempts to rebuild bridges.

Prince William, when he was questioned by a TV reporter on a public engagement last Thursday, said he had not yet spoken to his younger brother, but vowed he would.

He also insisted the Royal Family were not racists after Meghan claimed one member had raised 'concerns' about 'how dark' her baby's skin would be, and suggested there was an attempt to deprive Archie of a title and security because he was of mixed race.

The duchess also said she had been given so little support by the Palace that she suffered suicidal thoughts.

Harry said he felt 'really let down' by his father, accused him of cutting him off financially and refusing to take his calls, while also revealing the gulf with William.

The Queen responded to the Oprah interview with a deeply personal message saying that while 'some recollections vary', the issues raised, particularly that of race, were 'concerning' and would be taken seriously.

Significantly, however, she emphasised that from now on the difficulties would be addressed by the family privately.

There have been a handful of stories published in the UK media reporting that Charles and William felt hurt by what Harry had said, but with very little detail on what was taking place behind the scenes. 

Prince William is pictured driving outside Kensington Palace in London on Tuesday, after it was revealed he had spoken with Harry over the weekend

Prince William is pictured driving outside Kensington Palace in London on Tuesday, after it was revealed he had spoken with Harry over the weekend

Gayle King revealed Prince Harry had spoken to his father, Prince Charles, and his brother, Prince William, over the weekend, but talks did not help repair a rift within the royal family

Gayle King revealed Prince Harry had spoken to his father, Prince Charles, and his brother, Prince William, over the weekend, but talks did not help repair a rift within the royal family 

How Harry and Meghan's Oprah interview has caused a royal crisis 

  • February 15 – It is confirmed Harry and Meghan will be interviewed by Oprah Winfrey on CBS in March, in which they will discuss Megxit and other issues.
  • February 16 – Harry's grandfather the Duke of Edinburgh is admitted to hospital in London
  • February 19 – Harry and Meghan are stripped of their prestigious patronages as the couple confirmed Megxit has become permanent.
  • February 26 – Harry says the 'toxic' atmosphere created by the British press forced him and his family to leave the UK, in an interview with James Corden
  • March 1 – A preview clip of the Oprah interview shows Harry saying his biggest fear is that 'history would repeat itself' in a reference to his mother's death, while the host is also seen asking Meghan if she was 'silent or silenced', but her answer is not revealed. 
  • March 3 – A spokesman for Meghan says she is 'saddened' by a report in The Times that she faced a bullying complaint while at Kensington Palace.
  • March 7 – Meghan and Harry's explosive interview with Oprah Winfrey airs in the US. The Sussexes laid bare their brief lives as a working royal couple, alleging a member of the family made a racist comment about their son, and how the duchess had suicidal thoughts but her approaches to the monarchy for help were turned down.
  • March 8  – The fallout from the interview continues and the couple's chat with Oprah airs in the UK on ITV.
  • March 9 – Buckingham Palace issues a statement, saying the Queen is 'saddened' to hear the full extent of the challenges faced by the Sussexes and the issues raised around race are 'concerning'.
  • March 11 - Prince William insists the royal family are 'not a racist family' while visiting a school in London. 
  • March 16 - Gayle King reveals Harry has spoken to his brother Prince William and their father Prince Charles. 
Advertisement

Harry was accused of 'embarrassing' hypocrisy this week for speaking to CBS, which caused outrage in 2004 by showing a photograph of his mother dying in a 1997 car crash in Paris.

Miss King told viewers she had called Harry and Meghan at their £10million California home 'over the weekend' to discuss the fall-out from the interview and revealed they had told her details of their intimate conversations.

She said: 'Well I'm not trying to break news, but I did actually call them to see how they were feeling, and it's true, Harry has talked to his brother and he has talked to his father too.

'The word I was given was that those conversations were not productive. But they are glad that they have at least started a conversation.'

Miss King also claimed the couple were unhappy that 'the Palace' had allegedly been leaking what they believed were untrue stories to the media.

She added: 'And I think what is still upsetting to them is the Palace keep saying they want to work it out privately, but yet, they believe these false stories are coming out that are very disparaging against Meghan, still.'

She made clear that the duchess was unhappy that no one in the family had called her. 'No one in the Royal Family has talked to Meghan yet, at this particular time,' she said.

The Sussexes effectively accused the Royal Family and Buckingham Palace of institutional racism in their interview with Miss Winfrey.

But Miss King claimed they felt 'frustrated' that much of the coverage had focused on this – when they had apparently wanted only to provoke the monarchy into taking action against the media, which they believe has a racist agenda against Meghan.

'It's frustrating for them to see that it's a racial conversation about the Royal Family when all they wanted all along was for the royals to intervene and tell the Press to stop with the unfair, inaccurate, false stories that definitely have a racial slant,' Miss King said. 

'And until you can acknowledge that, I think it's going to be hard to move forward.' 

She also raised the issue of the investigation launched earlier this month by Buckingham Palace into how claims of bullying against Meghan lodged by a senior member of staff were handled. 

She said: 'Anyone who has worked with her will tell you exactly who she is. You know, she's really a very sweet, caring person.' 

There was no immediate indication from the couple's team of PR representatives – either in London or California – as to whether Miss King was speaking at their request.

Piers Morgan's replacement Ben Shephard calls for the Royals to 'share their truth' with Harry and Meghan - sparking mockery from GMB co-star Susanna Reid for 'sounding like a Californian therapist'

ITV presenter Ben Shephard was mocked by his Good Morning Britain co-hosts today for urging the Royal Family and the Duke and Duchess of Sussex to 'share their truth' and 'hopefully start healing' after their talks were leaked.

Shephard, who added that it was important for everyone 'to be honest with each other', was accused by Susanna Reid of 'sounding like a Californian therapist' while Ranvir Singh joked that he needed to get his 'teeth whitened'.

Shephard, 46, who is standing in for Piers Morgan who resigned last week, told the programme: 'It feels like this is the sort of thing that's not going to be sorted out in one phone call. We don't know how much is going on either.

'But if there's been such a hugely seismic moment within a family that has been suddenly thrown, very personal things have been thrown into the spotlight, it's not going to be sorted out quickly.

'It's going to take a while for everybody to be able to share their truth and be able to be honest with each other and hopefully start healing, because that's what we all want.'

Reid then told him: 'You sound like a Californian therapist, Ben.' Shephard replied: 'Maybe I should be.' Reid added: 'Speaking a bit of truth and healing.' And Singh joked: 'You need a bit of tan, Ben... get your teeth whitened.' 

The language used by Shephard has strong similarities to the words from Meghan and Harry during their bombshell interview with Oprah Winfrey which first aired on CBS on March 7 and then on ITV the following night.

Meghan used the word 'truth' seven times during the interview, while Oprah told her she was speaking 'your truth' - and the Duchess also talked about giving an 'honest' answer relating to the row over Archie's potential skin tone. 

The word 'healing' was used by Gayle King yesterday when she spoke of Harry's talks with Prince Charles and William - and, during the Oprah chat, Harry said of his relationship with William: 'Time heals all things, hopefully.'

Shephard's choice of words was also in stark contrast to the language of Morgan who quit Good Morning Britain last week after he refused to apologise for casting doubts on comments made by Meghan in the interview.

His remarks on the programme sparked more than 41,000 complaints to the media regulator Ofcom, which also had a complaint on behalf of the Duchess of Sussex herself, who had earlier also sent a formal complaint to ITV. 

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex in conversation with Oprah Winfrey in an interview first aired on CBS on March 7

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex in conversation with Oprah Winfrey in an interview first aired on CBS on March 7

ITV presenter Ben Shephard (left) mocked by his Good Morning Britain co-host Susanna Reid (right) on today's show on ITV

ITV presenter Ben Shephard (left) mocked by his Good Morning Britain co-host Susanna Reid (right) on today's show on ITV

Also today, British chat show host Trisha Goddard told Good Morning Britain: 'Beyond them being a Royal Family they're a family, and this is the part I'm concentrating on.

'And I've said all along when they did that interview what I heard was absolute pain and anguish - and they might not have got all the details right and what have you but the message was we are in pain.

Piers Morgan calls on Britons to 'stand up for our Queen' as he lays into Harry and Meghan for trying to paint the royals as 'a bunch of heartless racists' 

Former GMB host Piers Morgan is pictured in London last week

Former GMB host Piers Morgan is pictured in London last week

Piers Morgan has called on Britons to 'stand up for our Queen' while accusing Harry and Meghan of leading a campaign to paint the Royal Family as a 'bunch of heartless racists'.

The former GMB host took to Twitter to slam the Duke and Duchess of Sussex a week after resigning from his presenter role for refusing to apologise for comments he made about the couple's controversial interview with Oprah.

He took aim at the couple again last night, writing: 'There's a very deliberate & malicious campaign being perpetrated by the Duke and Duchess of Sussex to smear, defame and trash Britain, our Monarchy & the Royal Family as a bunch of heartless racists. It's disgusting. Time to stand up for our Queen.'

It is the latest chapter in the fallout from Harry and Meghan's explosive interview with Oprah where the couple suggested that the Royal family was racist, claiming that one unnamed member was concerned over how dark their son Archie's skin would be. 

Speaking after the bombshell interview aired, Morgan said he did not believe the duchess's remarks in her interview with Oprah, during which she spoke about her mental health and having suicidal thoughts.

He then stormed off set after GMB weatherman Alex Beresford took exception to his comments about Meghan. Shortly afterwards, he left his role as presenter after refusing to apologise for his remarks.

Advertisement

'Now the Royal Family - a family - needs time to react to that. I'm reminded of something that the Duke of Edinburgh and Prince Charles apparently were having a conversation back in the days of Princess Diana.

'And apparently the Duke of Edinburgh said to Prince Charles I wish you and Diana would just speak, just talk.

'And Prince Charles said, well here's the problem, every time I do it ends up on the front page of a certain tabloid.

'So if a family feels that everything they're going to say is going to end up as a headline, they're naturally going to be more reticent and perhaps less honest, and maybe more sparing with the communication.'

It comes as Harry and Meghan revealed deeply private family conversations to their journalist friend Gayle King, saying that the prince had finally spoken to his father and brother following the interview.

Hours later, Miss King disclosed on CBS yesterday that the talks 'were not productive'. The breakfast show host also suggested that Meghan was unhappy no one in the Royal Family had thought to telephone her. 

And, in a thinly veiled threat, the presenter said the duchess had 'documents to back up everything she said on Oprah's interview'.

The fact the Sussexes chose to reveal sensitive discussions between senior members of the Royal Family met with an icy response from Buckingham Palace.

'None of the households [the Queen, the Prince of Wales and the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge] will be giving a running commentary on private conversations,' said a senior royal source.

It was clear, however, that both the Windsors and senior officials see it as a severe betrayal of trust and unhelpful to attempts to rebuild bridges.

Prince William, when he was questioned by a TV reporter on a public engagement last Thursday, said he had not yet spoken to his younger brother, but vowed he would.

He also insisted the Royal Family were not racists after Meghan claimed one member had raised 'concerns' about 'how dark' her baby's skin would be, and suggested there was an attempt to deprive Archie of a title and security because he was of mixed race.

The duchess also said she had been given so little support by the Palace that she suffered suicidal thoughts.

Harry said he felt 'really let down' by his father, accused him of cutting him off financially and refusing to take his calls, while also revealing the gulf with William.

The Queen responded to the Oprah interview with a deeply personal message saying that while 'some recollections vary', the issues raised, particularly that of race, were 'concerning' and would be taken seriously. 

Significantly, however, she emphasised that from now on the difficulties would be addressed by the family privately. 

 

How on earth will lobbing yet more grenades help heal the rift?

COMMENT BY STEPHEN GLOVER

Only nine days ago, Meghan and Harry launched several bazookas in the direction of the Royal Family with the assiduous assistance of Oprah Winfrey, firstly on CBS in America and then on ITV.

Tens of millions of people watched as Meghan alleged that an unidentified member of the Royal Family was racist, while Harry accused his father both of financial meanness and refusing to take his calls. Poor Prince William was said by Harry to be 'trapped'.

As family spats go, this was a humdinger. Many people on the receiving end of such public insults from close relatives might prefer not to talk to them for a fair while.

But, to their credit, Prince Charles and Prince William did not sit roasting. They appear to have picked up the telephone over the weekend to speak with hot-headed Harry. It seems they both love and care for him.

And what was their reward? CBS presenter Gayle King – a close friend of Meghan, as well as of Oprah Winfrey – informed the world yesterday that Harry had spoken on the phone with the Prince of Wales and the Duke of Cambridge, jeopardising the peace process as she spilled the beans.

Ms King boasted she had talked to the Sussexes, and got from them the 'word that these conversations were not productive'. 

According to her, it was 'frustrating' for Meghan and Harry that everyone was talking about the charge of royal racism.

All they had ever wanted was for the 'royals to intervene and tell the Press to stop with the unfair, inaccurate, false stories that definitely have a racial slant'. It appears that neither Charles nor William was keen to take up the cudgels on their behalf.

I suppose we should consider the possibility that Gayle King is an out-and-out fantasist who imagines the thoughts whirling through Meghan's mind. 

But it seems most unlikely. Apart from anything else, the Sussexes have not contradicted her account.

No, she was speaking as Meghan's spokeswoman – and Harry's too, I fear – in what almost amounts to an infringement of privacy by a couple who are forever complaining about media intrusion. 

Yet once again they have spoon-fed an American broadcaster.

Appearances can be deceptive, but if Prince William's glum face yesterday was any guide, he was seriously cheesed off by the Sussexes' breach of confidentiality. One can understand his feelings.

Why has Meghan, with Harry presumably at her side, chosen to lob another grenade at the Royal Family just as Charles and William were recovering from the last assault?

For her calculated intervention will surely make the resumption of peace talks between the two sides more difficult. It could widen the gulf, and increase a justifiable sense of betrayal in royal circles.

Meghan is evidently an intelligent woman, who is well aware of the likely consequences of Ms King acting as her mouthpiece. 

If she is prepared to risk the further souring of relations with the Royal Family, one can only assume it is because she has another motive.

Basking in the approval of millions of Americans after her Oprah Winfrey interview, and now an international celebrity in her own right, she is evidently prepared to go on undermining the Royal Family until or unless it comes to heel.

Her request for its help in her self-serving war against the Press is manifestly absurd. 

She – I should say Gayle King – accuses the Press of still running 'unfair, inaccurate, false stories that definitely have a racial slant' without (as usual) citing a single instance.

The truth is that in Meghan's view any criticism of her must be racist. 

This is a wild and ridiculous assertion – which does not prevent it from being shared by her uncritical admirers.

Gayle King 'was speaking as Meghan's spokeswoman – and Harry's too, I fear,' writes STEPHEN GLOVER

Gayle King 'was speaking as Meghan's spokeswoman – and Harry's too, I fear,' writes STEPHEN GLOVER

How will this end? It seems increasingly unlikely that the wounds Meghan has caused, and continues to cause, will easily be healed. 

She gives no indication that she wants to heal them.

From her spokeswoman Gayle King she received this implausible encomium. 

'You know, she's really a very sweet, caring person. And, as I say, Meghan has documents to back up everything that she said on Oprah's interview. Everything.'

That is certainly good to know. 

We await proof of her contention that she was married in secret three days before their wedding in Windsor. 

Documents confirming 'several conversations' when she was pregnant about 'how dark [her baby's] skin will be when he's born' will also be fascinating.

There is, of course, one person who can help restore Meghan's sense of proportion, tighten her grip on reality, and rebuild bridges with the Royal Family. And that is her husband.

Harry can't want this increasingly messy and unpleasant estrangement from those he still loves. 

I don't believe he can look forward to living as a celebrity, albeit one junior to his wife, in a foreign country, forsaken by his family.

There were wise words yesterday from former First Lady, Michelle Obama. 

She spoke of the importance of public service, and insisted that 'there's nothing more important than family'.

Yes, wise words. But will Meghan – and Harry in particular – listen? I fear this story may have the unstoppable momentum of tragedy. Prince Charles and Prince William were right to pick up the phone. If they get the same treatment again, next time could be the last time.

'Public service is not about us... it's about the people we serve': Michelle Obama takes thinly veiled swipe at Meghan's interview but adds she was 'NOT surprised' by claims of Royal Family racism 

Michelle Obama told NBC that racism claims didn't shock her

Michelle Obama told NBC that racism claims didn't shock her

Michelle Obama reacted to Meghan Markle and Prince Harry's Oprah Winfrey interview this morning by saying that she personally chose to focus on the people she 'serves' rather than herself while in public service in what appeared to be a thinly veiled swipe at the couple.

Mrs Obama was asked by Jenna Bush Hager what she thought of Meghan's comments in a segment that aired on NBC today. 'When you watched Meghan Markle speak out, what went through your mind?' Ms Bush Hager asked.

Mrs Obama replied: 'Public service it's a bright, sharp, hot spotlight and most people don't understand it nor should they. The thing that I always keep in mind is that none of this is about us, in public service, it's about the people that we serve.

'I always try to push the light back out and focus it on the folks that we're actually here to serve.'

Ms Bush Hager then said: 'But what about when she talked about the fact that she experienced racism? I mean I feel like that was heartbreaking to hear that she felt like she was in her own family, her own family, thought differently of her.'

Mrs Obama, who met most of the Royal Family when serving as First Lady, replied: 'Race isn't a new construct in this world, for people of color. So it wasn't a complete surprise to, sort of, hear her feelings and have them articulated.

She went on: 'The thing that hope for and the thing that I think about is that this first and foremost is a family and I pray for forgiveness and healing for them so they can use his as a teachable moment for them all.'

Mrs Obama's choice of words refers back to the war of words between Harry and Meghan and Buckingham Palace in February when the Palace said the pair were permanently stepping back from a life of 'public service' and not returning to work.

The couple responded with their own statement saying: 'We can all live a life of service. Service is universal.'

Advertisement

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMihQFodHRwczovL3d3dy5kYWlseW1haWwuY28udWsvbmV3cy9hcnRpY2xlLTkzNzA5MTUvVGVhbS1NZWdoYW4tY3J5LWRvdWJsZS1zdGFuZGFyZHMtbmV3LWZldWQtUm95YWxzLWNvdXBsZXMtcmV2ZWxhdGlvbnMtR2F5bGUtS2luZy5odG1s0gGJAWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmRhaWx5bWFpbC5jby51ay9uZXdzL2FydGljbGUtOTM3MDkxNS9hbXAvVGVhbS1NZWdoYW4tY3J5LWRvdWJsZS1zdGFuZGFyZHMtbmV3LWZldWQtUm95YWxzLWNvdXBsZXMtcmV2ZWxhdGlvbnMtR2F5bGUtS2luZy5odG1s?oc=5

2021-03-17 08:47:19Z
52781438760645

Sarah Everard: Officer 'sent meme of guide to abduction and murder' - Metro.co.uk

Sarah Everard meme
The officer has been removed from duty over the sick joke (Picture: PA)

A police officer guarding the site where Sarah Everard’s remains were found allegedly sent a sick meme about her kidnap and murder to seven colleagues.  

The Met PC is said to have shared a parody of the Highway Code showing a guide of the six stages from abduction to murder.  

The meme, obtained by the Daily Mail, reportedly shows an officer directing traffic and holding a hand up which reads: ‘Stop single girl’.  

He then gives signals for different twisted actions, which ends in the murder and disposal of the body.  

The officer allegedly sent the image over WhatsApp on Thursday, a day after Ms Everard’s body was found in the woodland he was guarding in Ashford, Kent.  

Advertisement

Advertisement

Sickened colleagues reported him and he was immediately moved off the inquiry and placed on restricted duties with no direct involvement with the public. 

Meme 'cop sent to seven officers' from Sarah Everard crime scene
The officer is said to have shared a parody of the Highway Code showing a guide to abduction and murder

Scotland Yard said an investigation had been launched and that the incident had been referred to the Independent Office for Police Conduct. 

The force confirmed on Monday than a cordon officer had been removed from duty for  allegedly sharing an ‘inappropriate graphic’ but declined to give details about the image.  

They said the graphic did not contain photographic images, pictures of Ms Everard, or any other material obtained from or related to the investigation into her murder.  

Last June, two Met officers were arrested for allegedly sharing selfies on WhatsApp of the bodies of murdered sisters Bibaa Henry, 46, and Nicole Smallman, 27, while guarding their murder scene in Wembley. 

Sarah Everard
Sarah Everard’s body was found in woodland in Ashford, Kent
Metropolitan Police officers continue their search near The Rope Walk in Sandwich, Kent, after a body found hidden in woodland at Ashford was identified as that of 33-year-old Sarah Everard.
The officer sent the meme while guarding the search site in Kent (Picture: PA)

The meme sent by the officer on the Sarah Everard case was described by one source as ‘unpalatable’. 

Assistant Commissioner Nick Ephgrave, said: ‘The MPS expects its officers to behave professionally at all times and this includes how they use social media. I take allegations that any officer or officers have failed to observe these standards very seriously and have referred this matter to the IOPC.’ 

Serving Met Police officer Wayne Couzens, 48, is charged with the kidnap and murder of Ms Everard, who disappeared while walking home from a friend’s in Clapham, south-west London, on March 3. 

He has been remanded in custody until a plea hearing in July and is likely to face trial in autumn.

Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.

For more stories like this, check our news page.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiaWh0dHBzOi8vbWV0cm8uY28udWsvMjAyMS8wMy8xNy9zYXJhaC1ldmVyYXJkLW9mZmljZXItc2VudC1tZW1lLW9mLWd1aWRlLXRvLWFiZHVjdGlvbi1hbmQtbXVyZGVyLTE0MjU3MDg1L9IBbWh0dHBzOi8vbWV0cm8uY28udWsvMjAyMS8wMy8xNy9zYXJhaC1ldmVyYXJkLW9mZmljZXItc2VudC1tZW1lLW9mLWd1aWRlLXRvLWFiZHVjdGlvbi1hbmQtbXVyZGVyLTE0MjU3MDg1L2FtcC8?oc=5

2021-03-17 07:39:00Z
52781425496647

US fires warning shot at Johnson on Northern Ireland - Financial Times

Boris Johnson is coming under pressure from Washington to end his stand-off with Brussels over Northern Ireland, as Joe Biden prepares to hold St Patrick’s day talks with Irish premier Micheál Martin.

On the eve of the talks, Washington lawmakers published a resolution warning they would oppose any UK-US trade deal unless the British prime minister upheld the terms of the 1998 Good Friday peace agreement.

Meanwhile, Martin has said he hopes the US president, who declared last year “I’m Irish”, will use his influence to calm post-Brexit tensions between the UK and the EU and to secure the “right outcomes” in Northern Ireland.

“We want to see a continuation of the president’s interest in Ireland and support for the peace process and the Good Friday Agreement and also of upholding the Brexit agreement itself,” Martin told CBS ahead of his virtual talks with Biden.

The EU this week started legal action against Britain after Johnson authorised a unilateral easing of rules governing trade between Great Britain and Northern Ireland, allegedly in breach of the UK’s Brexit treaty with the bloc.

Johnson denies that Britain acted unlawfully and said he was acting to smooth trade across the Irish Sea, by extending “grace periods” that ease the impact of Brexit red tape on Northern Irish businesses.

But some in Brussels fear Johnson secretly wants to rip up the Northern Ireland protocol, which sets up controls at Irish Sea ports to check goods that might enter the EU single market over the open land border on the island of Ireland.

While that would please pro-UK unionist politicians in Northern Ireland, who dislike any border between the region and Great Britain, it would alarm nationalists, the Irish government and Biden, because it would raise the spectre of possible controls on the island of Ireland.

Neither the EU nor Dublin would accept such controls. The cross party resolution by US senators said the reintroduction of “barriers, checkpoints or personnel on the island of Ireland” would “threaten the successes of the Good Friday Agreement”.

The resolution added that any new or amended trade deals between the US and UK should take into account whether the conditions of the Good Friday Agreement are met.

Johnson has insisted he stands by the Northern Ireland protocol, which he negotiated as part of his 2019 Brexit deal to avoid a hard border on the island of Ireland. He has said it has to operate in the interests of both communities in the region.

The UK government has accused Brussels of dragging its feet in finding solutions to friction on the Irish Sea border — for example in trade involving supermarket goods — such that London has had to act unilaterally.

Lord Peter Mandelson, former Northern Ireland secretary, warned in a letter to the Financial Times that unless the Northern Ireland dispute was solved it could broaden into a corrosive, wider breakdown in relations between London and Brussels.

“The alternative of continuing the present stand off will not only threaten stability in Northern Ireland but the economic and security interests of the UK and EU as a whole for the foreseeable future,” he wrote.

Lord John Kerr, former UK ambassador to Washington and Brussels, said he expected Biden to discreetly send “emissaries” to the Johnson government to urge him to make the Northern Ireland protocol work.

“I would expect the private message to be: ‘Don’t you think this is rather dangerous?’” added Kerr. He said Northern Ireland could be “the leading edge” for a wider “tit-for-tat” dispute between Britain and the EU.

Lord Chris Patten, former Tory party chairman, said Lord David Frost, the UK minister for EU relations, had made things worse through heavy-handed work on the Northern Ireland question.

“This requires diplomacy which doesn’t assume that the best way to do origami is with a blowtorch,” he added.

Frost announced the extension of the grace periods for the flow of certain goods across the Irish Sea and only telephoned his EU counterpart, Maros Sefcovic, later. “Diplomacy is obviously not something that interests David Frost,” said Patten.

British officials admitted that Johnson’s appointment of the abrasive Frost, previously the UK’s chief Brexit negotiator, to his sensitive new role was seen in Brussels as “an aggressive move”, but insisted that was not the intention.

They said the unilateral move to extend the grace periods was notified at official level to Brussels in advance. “It wasn’t an attempt to dial things up,” added one official. “We want a normal relationship and make sure the situation is as normal as it can be.”

Another UK official said there had been no representations from the White House about the row over the Northern Ireland protocol.


“ 

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiP2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZ0LmNvbS9jb250ZW50LzJlMTFhNWRiLWRlYzAtNDFkZi1hOGM1LWQ4Y2JjYjAzYzE4M9IBP2h0dHBzOi8vYW1wLmZ0LmNvbS9jb250ZW50LzJlMTFhNWRiLWRlYzAtNDFkZi1hOGM1LWQ4Y2JjYjAzYzE4Mw?oc=5

2021-03-17 04:00:29Z
52781439767766

Sarah Everard vigil: More than half of people support Met Police handling of event - survey - Sky News

More than half of people have backed the Metropolitan Police over its handling of the vigil held for Sarah Everard last weekend, according to a survey.

Four people were arrested for public order and coronavirus regulation breaches during Saturday's vigil - with accusations police were heavy handed.

The research, commissioned by the crime and justice consultancy, Crest Advisory, showed 56% of men supported the tactics, compared with 50% of women.

Slightly more Londoners backed the police's handling of the event (44%) than disagreed with it (38%) - but nearly half of young adults aged 18-24 (46%) thought officers should not have intervened in the way they did.

Police were seen trying to disperse crowds at the vigil. The official event was cancelled, but hundreds showed up in defiance.
Image: Police were seen trying to disperse crowds at the vigil.

Asked who was viewed as being most responsible for the scuffles which took place between officers and people attending the event, 43% of respondents said "members of the public", with 29% blaming the police.

Just 9% said they blamed the government, which had introduced the coronavirus laws restricting gatherings

Women and Londoners were more evenly split on who was to blame, while young people aged 18-24 (39%) and Labour voters (42%) were more likely to say the police were mainly responsible.

The survey, of 1,672 adults, also questioned people about new government plans to allow the police to impose stricter conditions on protests after the pandemic, in order to prevent noise and serious disruption.

Opinion was sharply divided, with 38% saying they "strongly" or "slightly" supported them, and 36% saying they were opposed.

Harvey Redgrave, chief executive of Crest Advisory, said: "Today's poll shows the police retain widespread public consent for their approach to the pandemic, despite the negative headlines of the last few days."

People hold placards during a protest at the Trafalgar Square, following the kidnap and murder of Sarah Everard, in London, Britain March 14, 2021. REUTERS/Henry Nicholls
Image: There are concerns that the bill will limit people's ability to protest

Addressing the poll findings about the new Bill, Mr Redgrave added: "The government's new proposals on the policing of protest do not appear to have clear majority consent, which will fuel fears that the legislation is likely to put the police in an increasingly awkward position."

Ms Everard disappeared on 3 March while walking back to her home in Brixton, south London.

Her body was found a week later in woodland in Ashford, Kent and was identified through dental records.

Serving Metropolitan Police officer Wayne Couzens, 48, will face trial on 25 October, charged with the kidnap and murder of Ms Everard.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMifGh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L3NhcmFoLWV2ZXJhcmQtdmlnaWwtbW9yZS10aGFuLWhhbGYtb2YtcGVvcGxlLXN1cHBvcnQtbWV0LXBvbGljZS1oYW5kbGluZy1vZi1ldmVudC1zdXJ2ZXktMTIyNDgzNjXSAYABaHR0cHM6Ly9uZXdzLnNreS5jb20vc3RvcnkvYW1wL3NhcmFoLWV2ZXJhcmQtdmlnaWwtbW9yZS10aGFuLWhhbGYtb2YtcGVvcGxlLXN1cHBvcnQtbWV0LXBvbGljZS1oYW5kbGluZy1vZi1ldmVudC1zdXJ2ZXktMTIyNDgzNjU?oc=5

2021-03-17 03:07:04Z
52781425496647

Selasa, 16 Maret 2021

UK defence review: A return to hard power? - Sky News

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiK2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNoP3Y9N2wtQlo2YkFXeTDSAQA?oc=5

2021-03-16 21:21:34Z
52781433636367