Jumat, 05 Maret 2021

COVID-19: 1% pay rise for NHS staff 'the most' the government can afford, says minister Nadine Dorries - Sky News

A 1% pay rise for NHS workers is "the most" the government can afford due to the economic cost of the COVID crisis, a health minister has told Sky News.

The government is facing a furious backlash after calling for healthcare staff in England to be restricted to a pay rise of 1%.

But Nadine Dorries said it "would be wrong to say a single person in the government does not appreciate the effort" of NHS staff, as she defended the government not recommending a larger pay increase.

Live COVID updates from the UK and across the world

Medical workers move a patient between ambulances outside the Royal London Hospital
Image: The government has said NHS staff in England should be restricted to a 1% pay rise

"Of course, we recognise the sacrifice and the commitment and the vocation of nurses and all health workers over the past year," the minister said.

"We've all been touched by, or personally experienced, help by NHS workers.

"But I think it is important to note that the priority of the government has been about protecting people's livelihoods, about continuing the furlough scheme, about fighting the pandemic, and we've put huge effort into that.

More from Covid-19

"We did not want nurses to go unrecognised - or doctors - and no other public sector employee is receiving a pay rise, there has been a pay freeze.

"But the 1% offer is the most we think we can afford, which we have put forward to the pay review body."

The Royal College of Nursing, who have called for a 12.5% pay increase for nurses, said a 1% pay rise would amount to only an extra £3.50 a week in take home pay for an experienced nurse.

Inflation is currently at 0.9%, but other unions pointed to forecast inflation of 1.5% this year to claim a 1% pay rise for NHS staff would actually amount to a real terms pay cut.

Labour branded an under-inflation pay rise as "the ultimate kick in teeth to our NHS heroes who have done so much to keep us safe over the past year".

Ms Dorries, a former nurse, admitted "everybody in an ideal world would love to see nurses paid far more".

But she stressed there had been "huge borrowing and cost to the government" due to the coronavirus pandemic.

"Nurses have had a 12% increase in pay over the last three years, the average nurse's salary is around, quite rightly, £34,000 per annum," she added.

"This time last year we were just looking in the face of this global pandemic.

"And we all know what the last year has held and what we've had to go through; that has been a huge amount of expense on fighting the pandemic."

In its submission to the NHS pay review body, the Department for Health and Social Care (DHSC) said the total NHS budget was based on a headline pay award of 1% for staff.

Suggesting that any larger pay award could require cuts to services, the DHSC document added: "Anything higher would require re-prioritisation."

And it said that maintaining "world-class patient care" requires "the right balance between pay and staff numbers through systems of reward that are affordable and fit for purpose".

In his spending review last year, Chancellor Rishi Sunak froze pay for most public sector workers outside the NHS.

A government spokesperson said: "Over one million NHS staff continue to benefit from multi-year pay deals agreed with trade unions, which have delivered a pay rise of over 12% for newly qualified nurses and will increase junior doctors' pay scales by 8.2%.

"Pay rises in the rest of the public sector will be paused this year due to the challenging economic environment, but we will continue to provide pay rises for NHS workers.

"The independent pay review bodies will report in late spring and we will consider their recommendations carefully when we receive them."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMihQFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9jb3ZpZC0xOS0xLXBheS1yaXNlLWZvci1uaHMtc3RhZmYtdGhlLW1vc3QtdGhlLWdvdmVybm1lbnQtY2FuLWFmZm9yZC1zYXlzLW1pbmlzdGVyLW5hZGluZS1kb3JyaWVzLTEyMjM2MzU30gGJAWh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2FtcC9jb3ZpZC0xOS0xLXBheS1yaXNlLWZvci1uaHMtc3RhZmYtdGhlLW1vc3QtdGhlLWdvdmVybm1lbnQtY2FuLWFmZm9yZC1zYXlzLW1pbmlzdGVyLW5hZGluZS1kb3JyaWVzLTEyMjM2MzU3?oc=5

2021-03-05 08:44:26Z
52781417690094

Harry and Meghan: Royal Family accused of 'double standards' over decision to investigate bullying claims - Sky News

The Royal Family has been accused of having "double standards" over its investigation into bullying claims against the Duchess of Sussex.

In an interview with Sky News, the co-author of Harry and Meghan biography Finding Freedom questioned why the palace had ordered an investigation into the duchess but had not done so with Prince Andrew.

The Queen's son was friends with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and has himself been accused by one woman of sexual abuse. The duke has categorically denied the claims and said he was unaware of Epstein's criminal activities at the time.

Buckingham Palace revealed on Wednesday it would be investigating allegations of bullying against the duchess during her time as a working royal, after The Times newspaper revealed claims she had "destroyed" one member of staff and another was left in tears.

Carolyn Durand is the co-author of the biography, released last summer, billed as Harry and Meghan's side of the story, despite the couple's spokesperson insisting they were not interviewed for it. The authors said they had spoken to people very close to the couple for the book.

She told Sky News: "There's been a lot of double standards that we're talking about.

"Why is there an investigation into this bullying but there's not been an investigation into Prince Andrew and the allegations surrounding Jeffrey Epstein and the women who have made allegations?

More from Duchess Of Sussex

"Why hasn't he been urged to cooperate with US authorities? Why were Prince Harry's military honours stripped [after he stepped down as a working royal] but Prince Andrew's haven't been?"

She added the "double standards" were something Meghan had "really struggled with" and "her friends were concerned about her".

Harry and Meghan have said they are the victims of a calculated smear campaign, while their lawyer said the claims against Meghan are based on "misleading and harmful misinformation".

Please use Chrome browser for a more accessible video player

Meghan accuses palace of 'perpetuating falsehoods'

Tensions have risen between the couple and the Royal Family after it was revealed Harry and Meghan would be giving a wide-ranging interview to Oprah Winfrey - going against the Windsors' long-held mantra of "never complain, never explain".

Short clips released from the interview show the duchess saying she could not be expected to "just be silent" if the Royal Family is playing an "active role" in "perpetuating falsehoods" about her.

Prince Harry also talks about his fears of "history repeating itself", apparently in reference to how his mother Princess Diana was treated by the press and the Royal Family.

Meghan Markle visits the Terrence Higgins Trust World AIDS Day charity fair at Nottingham Contemporary with her fiancee Britain's Prince Harry, in Nottingham
Meghan Markle visits the Terrence Higgins Trust World AIDS Day charity fair at Nottingham Contemporary with her fiancee Britain's Prince Harry, in Nottingham, December 1, 2017. REUTERS/Adrian Dennis/Pool
Image: Meghan has said she could not be expected to 'just be silent'

Describing Meghan's experience with the UK media, Ms Durand said: "It was devastating to her to be attacked in many respects, and also with her mother being attacked."

She also referenced a Daily Mail headline which had described Meghan as "(almost) Straight Outta Compton", commenting: "We can't overstate how much that must have been hurtful to her."

Ms Durand also said there were "genuine concerns" over information about the couple being leaked to the media from within the institution, including the news they would be stepping back from their roles.

Harry and Meghan stepped down as senior royals to pursue a new life in the US last year.

Their interview with Oprah Winfrey is set to air this Sunday.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiemh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L3JveWFsLWZhbWlseS1hY2N1c2VkLW9mLWRvdWJsZS1zdGFuZGFyZHMtYnktaW52ZXN0aWdhdGluZy1tZWdoYW4tYnV0LW5vdC1wcmluY2UtYW5kcmV3LTEyMjM2Mjcy0gF-aHR0cHM6Ly9uZXdzLnNreS5jb20vc3RvcnkvYW1wL3JveWFsLWZhbWlseS1hY2N1c2VkLW9mLWRvdWJsZS1zdGFuZGFyZHMtYnktaW52ZXN0aWdhdGluZy1tZWdoYW4tYnV0LW5vdC1wcmluY2UtYW5kcmV3LTEyMjM2Mjcy?oc=5

2021-03-05 07:14:42Z
52781415449045

Kamis, 04 Maret 2021

Nurses' union anger over 'pitiful' 1% NHS pay rise - BBC News

NHS staff
PA Media

The government can expect a "backlash" if it goes ahead with a proposed 1% pay rise for NHS staff in England next year, a nursing union has warned.

The health department has made the recommendation in a submission to the independent panel that advises on NHS salaries.

The Royal College of Nursing called the suggested rise "pitiful" and said nurses should be getting 12.5% more.

NHS staff have been excluded from a pay freeze for most public sector workers.

The NHS Pay Review Body is due to recommend salary levels for health service staff before early May, before ministers then make a final decision.

In its submission, the health department said awarding NHS staff a "headline" pay increase of more than 1% "would require re-prioritisation".

Health department officials said the Covid pandemic had placed a "huge strain" on NHS finances, whilst the economic outlook "remains uncertain".

They added that this increase was still above the CPI rate of inflation, whilst some staff would see a higher rise under a previously agreed three-year deal.

Some 1.3 million public sector workers will see a pay freeze next year, while those earning less than £24,000 guaranteed a pay rise of at least £250.

Carrie Symonds and Boris Johnson
PA Media

Speaking on BBC's Question Time, Business Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng said he was sure the pay round "has been discussed and established at the right level".

"No one is doubting that the NHS hasn't been absolutely first class in this pandemic. What I am suggesting is that the whole economy has been under pressure," he added.

But Labour said a 1% increase for NHS staff was "the ultimate kick in teeth to our NHS heroes who have done so much to keep us safe over the past year".

The party's shadow health secretary Jonathan Ashworth said staff "deserve a fair pay rise," adding the proposal was "an absolute insult".

2px presentational grey line
Analysis box by Hugh Pym, health editor

NHS pay in England has been out of the news since 2018 when a three year deal was agreed and welcomed by unions.

But the issue is firmly back on the agenda with a new deal needed for the upcoming financial year.

This is just the start of the process.

The government has made its submission to the NHS Pay Review Body. But the fact that ministers think a 1% pay rise is reasonable has angered health unions.

They see it as scant reward for the huge efforts of staff during the pandemic.

Government sources say that inflation is so low that 1% still represents a real terms increase and that public finances are constrained.

This is shaping up to be a tense few months with pay added to the many difficult issues facing the NHS.

2px presentational grey line

RCN Chief Executive Dame Donna Kinnair said the government was "dangerously out of touch with nursing staff, NHS workers and the public".

"Nursing staff would feel they are being punished and made to pay for the cost of the pandemic. It is a political decision to underfund and undervalue nursing staff.

"With the time remaining before the Pay Review Body recommendation, the government can expect a backlash from a million NHS workers. Taxpayers are supportive of a significant and fair pay rise for NHS workers - this year of all years."

One nurse, Carmel O'Boyle, said she was "disgusted".

"We just want something that reflects the work that we do. We want a fair wage and I don't think the government understands at all what the nursing workforce does," she said.

"I understand it is a very difficult year for the whole world... but this is a political decision," she added.

The British Medical Association (BMA) said the recommendation was "a kick in the teeth".

Its chair of council, Dr Chaand Nagpaul, accused the government of a "total dereliction" of its "moral duty and obligation to a workforce that is keeping the NHS on its feet and patients alive".

He said: "Throughout the pandemic, doctors have cared for more critically ill patients than was ever thought possible and worked round the clock despite suffering from extreme stress and exhaustion.

"The government should demonstrate that it recognises the contribution of a workforce that has literally kept this country alive for the past 10 months."

A government spokesperson said they would "consider carefully" the recommendations made by the NHS Pay Review Body when it reports in the spring.

The government "will continue to provide pay rises for NHS workers", despite the wider freeze on pay in the rest of the public sector, the spokesperson said.

They added multi-year pay deals had delivered a pay rise of over 12% for newly qualified nurses, and will increase junior doctors' pay scales by 8.2%.

2px presentational grey line

How is public sector pay awarded?

  • Pay awards for approximately 45% of the public sector - including the armed forces, the police, teachers, the senior civil service and the NHS - are decided by government ministers based on the recommendation of eight Pay Review Bodies
  • Pay Review Bodies are independent, non-departmental public bodies who issue annual reports based on remits set by ministers
  • Pay for NHS staff was exempted from the public sector pay "pause" announced by the chancellor for 2021-22
2px presentational grey line
Banner saying 'Get in touch'

If you are an NHS worker, what are your views about your pay? Email: haveyoursay@bbc.co.uk.

Please include a contact number if you are willing to speak to a BBC TV journalist. You can also get in touch in the following ways:

If you are reading this page and can't see the form you will need to visit the mobile version of the BBC website to submit your question or comment or you can email us at HaveYourSay@bbc.co.uk. Please include your name, age and location with any submission.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTU2Mjg1MDg30gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvYW1wL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTU2Mjg1MDg3?oc=5

2021-03-04 22:54:25Z
52781417690094

1% NHS pay offer during pandemic is “worst kind of insult” say unions - BBC News - BBC News

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

  1. 1% NHS pay offer during pandemic is “worst kind of insult” say unions - BBC News  BBC News
  2. Recommended 1% pay rise for NHS staff labelled 'pitiful' by nursing union  Sky News
  3. Unions attack 'pitiful' 1% pay rise proposed for NHS staff  The Guardian
  4. Nurses' union anger over 'pitiful' 1% NHS pay rise  BBC News
  5. NHS workers get 'ultimate kick in teeth’ with ‘pitiful’ 1% pay rise  Metro.co.uk
  6. View Full coverage on Google News

https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiK2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNoP3Y9TUFzLWJqVWpCejjSAQA?oc=5

2021-03-04 22:21:22Z
52781417690094

Recommended 1% pay rise for NHS staff labelled 'pitiful' by nursing union - Sky News

A recommended 1% pay rise for NHS staff has been called "pitiful and bitterly disappointing" by nursing union leaders who said the government was "dangerously out of touch" with health workers.

The figure, which covers 2021 and 2022, is contained in a Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) document for the NHS Pay Review Body.

A section read: "The government announced a pause in public sector pay rises for all workforces, with an exception for employees with basic full-time equivalent salaries of £24,000 or under and for the NHS.

"In settling the DHSC and NHS budget, the government assumed a headline pay award of 1% for NHS staff. Anything higher would require re-prioritisation."

The UK Sepsis Trust estimates that 20,000 people will get sepsis within a year of being discharged from hospital with Covid
Image: Nursing leaders have hit out at the government. File pic: istock

The Royal College of Nursing (RCN) said a pay award "as poor as this" would mean only an extra £3.50 per week take home pay for an experienced nurse.

"Nursing staff would feel they are being punished and made to pay for the cost of the pandemic. It is a political decision to underfund and undervalue nursing staff," said the RCN's chief executive, Dame Donna Kinnair.

She called the 1% figure "pitiful and bitterly disappointing" and the government was "dangerously out of touch with nursing staff, NHS workers and the public".

More from Covid-19

She added that "it is not a done deal but the government has revealed its hand for the first time" and "can expect a backlash from a million NHS workers".

"Taxpayers are supportive of a significant and fair pay rise for NHS workers - this year of all years. Nursing deserves a 12.5% increase."

Chancellor Rishi Sunak delivers the budget to the House of Commons.
Image: Chancellor Rishi Sunak has 'shamefully insulted every single member of NHS staff', said Labour's Jonathan Ashworth

Sara Gorton, head of health at the Unison union, said: "No wonder the chancellor had nothing to say about the NHS yesterday. A 1% pay rise is the worst kind of insult the government could give health workers who've given their absolute everything over the past year.

"The public will be horrified. Staff will think it's some kind of joke."

Labour's shadow health secretary, Jonathan Ashworth, said: "A pay cut for NHS staff is the ultimate kick in the teeth to our NHS heroes who have done so much to keep us safe over the past year.

"Rishi Sunak's promised to be open and honest with the public yet shamefully insults every single member of NHS staff sneaking out this announcement and failing to include any mention of NHS pay in the budget."

Subscribe to the Daily podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker

A government spokesperson said: "Over one million NHS staff continue to benefit from multi-year pay deals agreed with trade unions, which have delivered a pay rise of over 12% for newly qualified nurses and will increase junior doctors' pay scales by 8.2%.

"Pay rises in the rest of the public sector will be paused this year due to the challenging economic environment, but we will continue to provide pay rises for NHS workers, on top of a £513m investment in professional development and increased recruitment.

"That's with record numbers of doctors and 10,600 more nurses working in our NHS, and with nursing university applications up by over a third.

"The independent pay review bodies will report in late spring and we will consider their recommendations carefully when we receive them."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiamh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L3JlY29tbWVuZGVkLTEtcGF5LXJpc2UtZm9yLW5ocy1zdGFmZi1sYWJlbGxlZC1waXRpZnVsLWJ5LW51cnNpbmctdW5pb24tMTIyMzU5ODbSAW5odHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9hbXAvcmVjb21tZW5kZWQtMS1wYXktcmlzZS1mb3ItbmhzLXN0YWZmLWxhYmVsbGVkLXBpdGlmdWwtYnktbnVyc2luZy11bmlvbi0xMjIzNTk4Ng?oc=5

2021-03-04 18:22:30Z
52781417690094

Towns Fund: How were the winners chosen? - BBC News

The town of Stocksbridge
Getty Images

The 45 towns in England that will share just over £1bn from the Towns Fund were announced in Wednesday's Budget.

There has been some criticism of the towns chosen.

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer said: "If you end up with a list of 45 areas where the funding is going in and 'by coincidence' 40 of them are where there is a Conservative MP, I think people would be saying, 'What's going on here? This looks fishy.'"

But Prime Minister Boris Johnson said: "The criteria is entirely objective, looking at data, poverty, employment."

And the government wanted to level up the country in "a completely impartial way".

Chancellor Rishi Sunak, meanwhile, said: "The formula for the grant payments for the new fund is based on an index of economic need."

But that is certainly not the only factor.

Picking a shortlist

BBC News analysis found 56 constituencies would benefit, as some of the 45 towns cover multiple constituencies.

Of those, 47 have Conservative MPs, including 14 gained from Labour at the 2019 election.

The other nine have Labour MPs.

The Conservatives tend to do better in towns, though, with Labour support generally stronger in cities.

Sir Keir has called on the government to publish the full criteria.

But we already know quite a lot about why the towns were chosen.

The first step was to pick a shortlist of 101 towns, which would be invited to apply for £25m, or £50m in exceptional circumstances.

Ranking towns

Following concern about the lack of transparency in that process, the National Audit Office (NAO) published a report setting out how the shortlist had been compiled.

Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) officials took a ranking of English towns by an Office for National Statistics (ONS) index of deprivation and then further ranked the 541 most deprived, about half of the total, using a formula based on:

  • income deprivation
  • skills deprivation
  • productivity (the amount produced per hour of work)
  • exposure to Brexit
  • exposure to economic shocks
  • level of private investment
  • eligibility for other government funding, which could be combined with Towns Fund money

The first four of those criteria were judged on official statistics and the last three on the judgement of officials.

Another factor was towns in more deprived areas were more likely to be shortlisted.

Setting priorities

The towns were then divided into priority groups:

  • high
  • medium
  • low

But the 40 high-priority towns did not necessarily have the highest scores based on the formula - some adjustments were made to ensure the most deprived areas in each region of England were included.

There were 318 medium-priority towns and 183 low.

The officials recommended ministers shortlist:

  • all 40 high priority
  • 60 of the medium
  • none of the low

They also suggested the 15 biggest towns should be excluded because they could also be eligible for city funding.

But the ministers ignored the advice on the biggest towns, putting 10 of the 15 on the shortlist.

And the final shortlist comprised:

  • all 40 high priority
  • 49 of the medium
  • 12 of the low

In choosing these 12 low-priority towns, ministers used criteria other than scores devised by civil servants, including:

  • being on the coast
  • poor transport links or a good geographical spread of towns across a region
  • potential for investment or growth
Town of Southport
Getty Images

Officials concluded the shortlist met Treasury rules for managing public money.

But it is clear there was considerable divergence from the formula devised by the civil servants.

We do not know exactly how the 45 winning towns were chosen from the 101 invited to apply.

But there were:

  • 19 of the high priority
  • 21 of the medium
  • five of the low

And the five low-priority towns, Cheadle, Leyland, Morley, Southport and Stocksbridge are all in constituencies with a Conservative MP.

The most striking choice was Cheadle.

It had the seventh lowest score on the MHCLG officials' list.

But ministers said it was primed for investment because of recent transport improvements in the area, as well as being strategically located between Stockport and Manchester Airport and having strong motorway links.

In a report on the process, the Public Accounts Committee of MPs said they were "not convinced by the rationales for selecting some towns and not others".

It added that: "The justification offered by ministers for selecting individual towns are vague and based on sweeping assumptions."

Presentational grey line
Reality Check branding
Presentational grey line

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiI2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzLzU2MjgzMTk50gEnaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvYW1wLzU2MjgzMTk5?oc=5

2021-03-04 17:42:49Z
CBMiI2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzLzU2MjgzMTk50gEnaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvYW1wLzU2MjgzMTk5

Sunak's alternative Budget 2021 | Comment - The Times and The Sunday Times

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

  1. Sunak's alternative Budget 2021 | Comment  The Times and The Sunday Times
  2. Budget 2021: 10 ways Rishi Sunak's speech affects you  BBC News
  3. Sunak defends plan to cut universal credit later this year  Guardian News
  4. Sunak is an arsonist posing as a firefighter. It's Labour's job to expose the truth  The Guardian
  5. What’s wrong with a 35pc tax burden? It’s still low by European standards  Telegraph.co.uk
  6. View Full coverage on Google News

https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiK2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNoP3Y9MTJFT0VFQ0xBM1HSAQA?oc=5

2021-03-04 14:44:44Z
52781409622088