Kamis, 04 Maret 2021

Brexit: EU negotiating 'with partner it can't trust', says Coveney - BBC News

Larne
PA Media

The EU is "negotiating with a partner it simply can't trust" in post-Brexit talks, Ireland's foreign minister has said.

On Wednesday, the UK said it would unilaterally extend grace periods for Irish Sea border checks, a move the EU said was a breach of international law.

Simon Coveney said he preferred "engagement", but the UK government was driving the EU towards legal action.

The grace periods mean procedures and checks are not yet fully applied.

Northern Ireland has remained a part of the EU's single market for goods so products arriving from GB undergo EU import procedures.

The first of these periods will expire at the end of March, but the UK has said it will be extended until October.

Mr Coveney said progress was being made on the Northern Ireland Protocol and the timing of the UK's move could not be worse.

Headshot Simon Coveney, wearing glasses with a green background in the middle distance
PA Media

"That is why the EU is now looking at legal options and legal action which means a much more formalised and rigid negotiation process as opposed to a process of partnership where you try to solve the problems together," he told RTÉ's Morning Ireland programme.

Conservative MP Simon Hoare, the chairman of the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee, said the UK needed to be alert to Mr Coveney's comments as it was important to maintain trust.

"If we go into these joint committees with an atmosphere of mistrust, my fear is... they won't be as fruitful as they could be and certainly the mood music is going to be in a minor key rather than in a major key," he told BBC Radio Foyle.

"You don't want to be moving house and then find in the first week that you move in that you're having a boundaries dispute with your neighbour."

Mr Coveney's party leader Leo Varadkar, who is Ireland's tánaiste (deputy prime minister), said the UK's actions were neither the way a friend, nor "a respectable, honourable country", should behave.

Northern Ireland Secretary Brandon Lewis said the UK was "taking several temporary operational steps to avoid disruptive cliff edges", and was continuing engagement with the EU through the Joint Committee, the body which facilitates ongoing negotiations between the EU and the UK.

"These recognise that appropriate time must be provided for businesses to implement new requirements, and support the effective flow of goods between Great Britain and Northern Ireland," he said.

'Within the UK's remit'

DUP MP Sir Jeffrey Donaldson said the EU's recent move to trigger Article 16 showed "very clearly that it remains within their remit to take unilateral action to protect the EU's single market".

"Under the Northern Ireland Protocol, the UK Government has the same power - to act unilaterally to protect the integrity of the UK internal market and trade between Northern Ireland and Great Britain," he told the BBC's Good Morning Ulster programme.

The EU reversed its Article 16 move within hours of taking the action, following condemnation from Belfast, London and Dublin.

European Commission Vice President Maroš Šefčovič later described the move as a mistake which had been made in the "intensity of the moment" of trying to secure Covid-19 vaccines.

Presentational grey line
Analysis box by John Campbell, NI economic and business editor

The move by the UK government to unilaterally extend grace periods for Irish Sea border checks put Ireland in an uncomfortable position.

Mr Coveney said Ireland was lobbying at the EU level to obtain easements on trade between GB and Northern Ireland.

Other Irish MEPs have written to the European Commission calling for an extension.

But there will be other member states who will be reluctant to offer any concessions if the UK is going to ride rough-shod over the process.

So what could be the end game?

The two sides will continue negotiating. The EU says it is looking at legal avenues open to it under both the withdrawal agreement and the wider UK-EU agreement.

However, the UK may question what practical steps the EU will really take if grace periods are extended.

The UK statement on Wednesday indicated the extra time gained by an extension of the grace period could be used to develop systems to ease trade between GB and NI in the long term.

The UK was also at pains to say it is not walking away from the protocol, it is simply finding ways to implement it.

Presentational grey line

On Wednesday, Mr Šefčovič said the UK's move to extend grace periods amounted to "a violation of the relevant substantive provisions" of the NI Protocol.

He said the EU would respond in accordance with the "legal means" established by the protocol and the wider Brexit deal.

Following a call on Wednesday evening between Mr Šefčovič and Lord Frost, the Cabinet Office minister with responsibility for EU relations, a UK government spokesperson said "official-level notification" of the move was made to the commission earlier this week.

Lord Frost had underlined the extension was needed for "operational reasons" and such measures were "well precedented in other international trade arrangements, and that they were entirely consistent with our intention to discharge our obligations under the Protocol in good faith", said a government spokesman.

Further guidance would be provided later this week on a grace period for parcel movements from Britain to Northern Ireland, he added.

That is due to to end on 1 April, meaning all parcels would need customs declarations.

2px presentational grey line

What is the Northern Ireland Protocol?

The Northern Ireland Protocol is part of the Brexit deal which prevents a hardening of the land border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.

It does that by keeping Northern Ireland in the EU single market for goods.

That has created a new trade border with Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK.

Unionists oppose the protocol, arguing that it has damaged internal trade from GB to NI and poses a risk to the future of the UK union.

But anti-Brexit parties in NI say that it must be implemented in full, and that issues should be worked out through joint UK-EU processes.

2px presentational grey line

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiLmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy93b3JsZC1ldXJvcGUtNTYyNzgxMjXSATJodHRwczovL3d3dy5iYmMuY29tL25ld3MvYW1wL3dvcmxkLWV1cm9wZS01NjI3ODEyNQ?oc=5

2021-03-04 11:17:39Z
52781417096531

Budget 2021: 'Scrooge Sunak not levelling with people' on cuts - BBC News

A volunteer packs and prepares food parcels at the Tottenham food bank at Tottenham Town Hall on 21 January 2021 in London, England.
Getty Images

Public spending cuts in Rishi Sunak's Budget mean the chancellor "isn't really levelling with people", the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) think tank has warned.

The Treasury said the cuts, worth £4bn, were "a purely mechanical change", but Paul Johnson of the IFS said they were set to cause more pain.

At the same time, big tax rises were "screeching U-turns", Mr Johnson said.

"Santa Sunak" was now looking more like "Scrooge Sunak", he added.

Meanwhile, "pressure will mount" on Mr Sunak not to cut universal credit by £20 a week after September, Mr Johnson said.

He said that going for such a "cliff-edge reduction" was "remarkable".

'Two Budgets'

In his post-Budget analysis, Mr Johnson highlighted freezes in income tax allowances and rises in corporation tax.

The corporation tax rise to 25% would take the UK "well up the international league table" for revenues, he said, but it was "50-50 at best" whether it would actually happen without additional concessions.

"This was, of course, a tale of two Budgets," said Mr Johnson in response to Mr Sunak's economic plans.

"By the end of the forecast period, we are looking at a fiscal tightening of over £30bn relative to previous plans.

"Take account of the cuts to planned spending announced in the autumn and Santa Sunak, purveyor of billions today, looks more like Scrooge Sunak, cutting spending and raising taxes to the tune of nearly £50bn relative to his pre-pandemic plans of March 2020."

The income tax allowance freezes were set to raise about £9bn, while the corporation tax changes could see revenues rise by more than £17bn by 2025, Mr Johnson said.

He was sceptical that the plans to cut a further £4bn from public spending could be delivered, saying they would cause "additional pain" if they went ahead.

"Now these are not firm plans, but they are the basis for the future public finance estimates. They are a very shaky basis," Mr Johnson said.

"This isn't just a mechanical change and presenting it as such means the chancellor isn't really levelling with people about the choices the government is making to repair the public finances."

Mr Johnson also criticised Mr Sunak's universal credit changes.

"It is, by the way, remarkable that while the chancellor felt the need for a gradual phase out of furlough, business rates support, stamp duty reductions and VAT reductions, he is still set on a cliff-edge reduction in [universal credit] such that incomes of some of the poorest families will fall by over £80 between one month and the next.

"Whatever the case for cutting generosity into the longer term, if you're going to do so, the case for doing it gradually rather than all at once looks unanswerable."

In a BBC interview, the chancellor rejected suggestions that he should have tapered the ending of the £20-a-week universal credit increase in order to minimise its effect on families.

"We have extended it generously and in full, but it's important to remember that it's one of many things that we're doing to support people," Mr Sunak said.

These included increases in the National Living Wage and offering help with council tax payments, he added.

Child with dirty hand
Getty Images

Earlier, the government came under fire from campaigners for doing too little in the Budget to address inequality.

The Joseph Rowntree Foundation and the Resolution Foundation said the cut in universal credit would bring the incomes of benefit recipients down to levels not seen since the early 1990s.

It would also pull half a million people into poverty, just as unemployment was expected to peak.

Mr Sunak's decision to spend even larger sums to support the economic recovery now and put off raising taxes until later was broadly welcomed in the Resolution Foundation's analysis of the Budget.

But it noted that while GDP is set to grow this year by 4%, that might not feed through to better living standards, with wages by the middle of the decade set to remain £1,200 a year - or 4.3% - below where they would have been without the coronavirus pandemic.

Austerity would drag on for some, it added, with day-to-day spending on government departments such as transport and local government set to fall in real terms next year and remain almost a quarter lower than a decade ago.

The Joseph Rowntree Foundation, an anti-poverty charity, said the universal credit changes meant single recipients of it would see their incomes cut by £20 a week, just as the furlough scheme is ended and unemployment was expected to rise to its peak, the foundation said.

It predicted that would pull half a million people into poverty, including 200,000 children, adding that the Budget was silent on helping 700,000 households who have fallen behind on rent because of the pandemic and are now at risk of eviction.

Responding to the Resolution Foundation's analysis, Mr Sunak told the BBC that it had hailed his decision to freeze income tax thresholds as a "progressive measure" and "a fair way to do what we need to do".

Budget banner top
Budget banner bottom
Banner saying 'Get in touch'

Are you receiving universal credit? Share your experiences by emailing haveyoursay@bbc.co.uk.

Please include a contact number if you are willing to speak to a BBC journalist. You can also get in touch in the following ways:

If you are reading this page and can't see the form you will need to visit the mobile version of the BBC website to submit your question or comment or you can email us at HaveYourSay@bbc.co.uk. Please include your name, age and location with any submission.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiLGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL2J1c2luZXNzLTU2Mjc2OTUz0gEwaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvYW1wL2J1c2luZXNzLTU2Mjc2OTUz?oc=5

2021-03-04 11:07:56Z
52781409622088

Meghan 'rowed with Palace staff over freebie designer clothes' - Metro.co.uk

composite image of Meghan Markle in designer clothing
Meghan is said to have rowed with aides about ‘freebie’ designer clothes (Picture: Getty)

Meghan Markle clashed with royal aides over wearing designer dresses, according to reports.

It comes as Buckingham Palace launched a bullying investigation into the Duchess of Sussex, around historic claims made against her when she was a working royal.

She strongly denies all the allegations against her, which arose amid heightened tensions between the couple and the rest of the royal family – and ahead of a highly anticipated interview with Oprah Winfrey early next week. She has also accused the family of ‘perpetuating falsehoods’.

Meghan, who is pregnant and expecting a second child with Prince Harry this year, wore designer labels while she was a working royal.

One unnamed source told The Sun: ‘As an actress it was perfectly acceptable to take freebies sent by fashion chains and designer labels.

Advertisement

Advertisement

‘But Meghan had to be told it was not the done thing when you are a member of the royal family.’

It comes after The Times reported that one of Meghan’s closest advisers, Jason Knauf, had made bullying allegations against her.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle on their wedding day
Prince Harry and his wife Meghan at Windsor Castle on their wedding day (Picture: Getty Images)

The paper reported claims that Meghan had driven out two personal assistants and undermined the confidence of a third — allegations which she denies.

Now it is being suggested that some of the rows were sparked by arguments around her clothing.

The royal family are said to be focused on the health of hospitalised Prince Philip, 99.

But Buckingham Palace said it was ‘very concerned’ about the allegations and would look into them.

Elon's latest Starship blew up after landing (SpaceX) SpaceX's latest Starship prototype performed a perfect touchdown, then exploded

In a statement in said that the royal household has a dignity at work policy and ‘does not and will not tolerate bullying or harassment in the workplace’.

The Duke and Duchess partly left the country because of what they saw as unfair treatment by the British media and refuse to co-operate with a number of tabloid newspapers, including The Sun.

It is unclear if they deny the allegations around designer clothing in the paper and a spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Metro.co.uk.

But responding to the bullying allegations generally in a statement earlier this week, a spokesman for the Sussexes said: ‘Let’s just call this what it is — a calculated smear campaign based on misleading and harmful misinformation. We are disappointed to see this defamatory portrayal of The Duchess of Sussex given credibility by a media outlet.

Advertisement

Advertisement

‘It’s no coincidence that distorted several-year-old accusations aimed at undermining The Duchess are being briefed to the British media shortly before she and The Duke are due to speak openly and honestly about their experience of recent years.’

He continued: ‘In a detailed legal letter of rebuttal to The Times, we have addressed these defamatory claims in full, including spurious allegations regarding the use of gifts loaned to The Duchess by the Crown.

‘The Duchess is saddened by this latest attack on her character, particularly as someone who has been the target of bullying herself and is deeply committed to supporting those who have experienced pain and trauma.

‘She is determined to continue her work building compassion around the world and will keep striving to set an example for doing what is right and doing what is good.’

Buckingham Palace declined to comment.

Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.

For more stories like this, check our news page.

MORE : Prince Philip’s treatment ‘is hurting him’ but he’s ‘improving’, Camilla reveals

Advertisement

Advertisement

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiZWh0dHBzOi8vbWV0cm8uY28udWsvMjAyMS8wMy8wNC9tZWdoYW4tcm93ZWQtd2l0aC1wYWxhY2Utc3RhZmYtb3Zlci1mcmVlYmllLWRlc2lnbmVyLWNsb3RoZXMtMTQxODQ3ODMv0gFpaHR0cHM6Ly9tZXRyby5jby51ay8yMDIxLzAzLzA0L21lZ2hhbi1yb3dlZC13aXRoLXBhbGFjZS1zdGFmZi1vdmVyLWZyZWViaWUtZGVzaWduZXItY2xvdGhlcy0xNDE4NDc4My9hbXAv?oc=5

2021-03-04 10:06:00Z
52781415449045

Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh, has had 'successful procedure' for pre-existing heart condition, palace says - Sky News

Prince Philip has had a "successful procedure" for a pre-existing heart condition.

Buckingham Palace said: "The Duke of Edinburgh yesterday underwent a successful procedure for a pre-existing heart condition at St Bartholomew's Hospital.

"His Royal Highness will remain in hospital for treatment, rest and recuperation for a number of days."

The Duke of Edinburgh, who turns 100 in June, is being treated at St Bartholomew's Hospital in London.

He was moved there by ambulance from the King Edward VII's Hospital on Monday.

Philip, the nation's longest-serving consort, has spent 16 nights in hospital - his longest ever stay.

He was initially admitted to the private King Edward VII's Hospital on 16 February as a precautionary measure after feeling unwell. The exact reason for his initial admission was not disclosed, but it was not related to coronavirus.

More from Prince Philip

The Prince of Wales arriving at the King Edward VII Hospital in London where the Duke of Edinburgh was admitted on Tuesday evening as a precautionary measure after feeling unwell. Picture date: Saturday February 20, 2021.
Image: The Prince of Wales made a 200-mile round trip to visit his father in hospital

Four days later, he was visited by his eldest son the Prince of Wales, who made a 200-mile round trip and stayed for around 30 minutes.

The duke has spent most of lockdown residing at Windsor Castle with the Queen for their safety, alongside a reduced household of staff dubbed HMS Bubble.

During a visit to a vaccination centre in London on Wednesday, the Duchess of Cornwall said Philip had "slightly improved".

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMib2h0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L3ByaW5jZS1waGlsaXAtaGFzLWhhZC1zdWNjZXNzZnVsLXByb2NlZHVyZS1mb3ItcHJlLWV4aXN0aW5nLWhlYXJ0LWNvbmRpdGlvbi0xMjIzNTQ1MNIBc2h0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2FtcC9wcmluY2UtcGhpbGlwLWhhcy1oYWQtc3VjY2Vzc2Z1bC1wcm9jZWR1cmUtZm9yLXByZS1leGlzdGluZy1oZWFydC1jb25kaXRpb24tMTIyMzU0NTA?oc=5

2021-03-04 09:33:45Z
52781415164433

Rishi Sunak plans 'mean that inequality will worsen' - BBC News

A volunteer packs and prepares food parcels at the Tottenham food bank at Tottenham Town Hall on 21 January 2021 in London, England.
Getty Images

The government has come under fire from campaigners for doing too little in the Budget to address inequality.

The Joseph Rowntree Foundation and the Resolution Foundation criticised the chancellor's decision to cut universal credit in six months' time.

They said it would bring the incomes of benefit recipients down to levels not seen since the early 1990s.

It would also pull half a million people into poverty, just as unemployment was expected to peak.

Rishi Sunak's decision to spend even larger sums to support the economic recovery now and put off raising taxes until later is broadly welcomed in the Resolution Foundation's overnight analysis of Wednesday's Budget.

But it noted that while GDP is set to grow this year by 4%, that might not feed through to better living standards, with wages by the middle of the decade set to remain £1,200 a year - or 4.3% - below where they would have been without the coronavirus pandemic.

Austerity would drag on for some, it added, with day-to-day spending on government departments such as transport and local government set to fall in real terms next year and remain almost a quarter lower than a decade ago.

The Joseph Rowntree Foundation, an anti-poverty charity, criticised a decision to extend a £20-a-week uplift to universal credit by only six months.

That meant single recipients of it would see their incomes cut by £20 a week, just as the furlough scheme is ended and unemployment was expected to rise to its peak, the foundation said.

It predicts that will pull half a million people into poverty, including 200,000 children, adding that the Budget was silent on helping 700,000 households who have fallen behind on rent because of the pandemic and are now at risk of eviction.

Responding to the Resolution Foundation's analysis, Mr Sunak told the BBC that it had hailed his decision to freeze income tax thresholds as a "progressive measure" and "a fair way to do what we need to do".

On universal credit, the chancellor rejected suggestions that he should have tapered the ending of the £20-a-week increase in order to minimise its effect on families.

"We have extended it generously and in full, but it's important to remember that it's one of many things that we're doing to support people," he said.

These included increases in the National Living Wage and offering help with council tax payments, he added.

Budget banner top
Budget banner bottom
Banner saying 'Get in touch'

Are you receiving universal credit? Share your experiences by emailing haveyoursay@bbc.co.uk.

Please include a contact number if you are willing to speak to a BBC journalist. You can also get in touch in the following ways:

If you are reading this page and can't see the form you will need to visit the mobile version of the BBC website to submit your question or comment or you can email us at HaveYourSay@bbc.co.uk. Please include your name, age and location with any submission.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiLGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL2J1c2luZXNzLTU2Mjc2OTUz0gEwaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvYW1wL2J1c2luZXNzLTU2Mjc2OTUz?oc=5

2021-03-04 08:38:46Z
52781409622088

Meghan tells Oprah she cannot be 'silent' if Royal Family is 'perpetuating falsehoods' - Sky News

The Duchess of Sussex has said she could not be expected to "just be silent" if the Royal Family is playing an "active role" in "perpetuating falsehoods" about her.

Meghan made the remarks in a second teaser clip for her heavily anticipated TV interview with Oprah Winfrey - which will be aired on Sunday 7 March in the US before being shown in the UK the next day.

Harry and Meghan are expected to lift the lid on their short period as working royals together before stepping back from their duties to pursue a new life in America.

The duchess says she is not afraid of the consequences of speaking out during the 30-second clip, before adding that "a lot... has been lost already".

Winfrey asks Meghan: "How do you feel about the Palace hearing you speak your truth today?"

She replies: "I don't know how they could expect that, after all of this time, we would still just be silent if there is an active role that The Firm is playing in perpetuating falsehoods about us.

"And, if that comes with risk of losing things, I mean, I ... there is a lot that has been lost already."

CBS has shared the clip after Buckingham Palace said it had launched an investigation into claims the duchess bullied former royal staff.

Meghan and Harry will not be part of the process and it is understood the palace hopes to start the investigation soon.

FILE - In this Tuesday, July 10, 2018 file photo Britain's Queen Elizabeth II, and Meghan the Duchess of Sussex and Prince Harry watch a flypast of Royal Air Force aircraft pass over Buckingham Palace in London. Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are to no longer use their HRH titles and will repay ..2.4 million of taxpayer's money spent on renovating their Berkshire home, Buckingham Palace announced Saturday, Jan. 18. 2020. (AP Photo/Matt Dunham, File)
Image: Buckingham Palace is investigating bullying claims against Meghan

Past and present employees are to be invited to speak in confidence about their experiences of working for Meghan, after it was alleged she drove out two personal assistants and staff were "humiliated" on several occasions.

The Times newspaper has reported the duchess "destroyed" one member of staff and another was left in tears before she departed.

There has long been speculation about the atmosphere in the Sussex household after a number of staff left.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have said they are the victims of a calculated smear campaign following the allegations.

Lawyers for the couple have said the claims are based on "misleading and harmful misinformation".

They also said Harry and Meghan believed staff were comfortable and happy.

Oprah Winfrey at Harry and Meghan's wedding in May 2018
Image: Oprah Winfrey at Harry and Meghan's wedding in May 2018

However, Jason Knauf, the Sussexes' former communications secretary, made a bullying complaint in October 2018 in an apparent attempt to force Buckingham Palace to protect staff.

A source suggested the attitude to the allegations was more about making them "go away" rather than "addressing" them, with the paper claiming Mr Knauf's complaint was never progressed.

The Times newspaper has chronicled what it describes as "turmoil" within palace walls.

They claim a number of sources said Meghan wanted to be a "victim" so her "unbearable experience" would convince Harry they had to leave to the UK - something her lawyers have denied.

The monarchy's "men in grey suits" have been accused of being aware of the alleged actions of the duchess and of doing "absolutely nothing to protect people".

Subscribe to the Daily podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker

Buckingham Palace said in a statement: "We are clearly very concerned about allegations in The Times following claims made by former staff of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

"Accordingly our HR team will look into the circumstances outlined in the article. Members of staff involved at the time, including those who have left the household, will be invited to participate to see if lessons can be learned.

"The royal household has had a dignity at work policy in place for a number of years and does not and will not tolerate bullying or harassment in the workplace."

Meghan's spokesman said: "The duchess is saddened by this latest attack on her character, particularly as someone who has been the target of bullying herself and is deeply committed to supporting those who have experienced pain and trauma.

"She is determined to continue her work building compassion around the world and will keep striving to set an example for doing what is right and doing what is good."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMib2h0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L21lZ2hhbi1zYXlzLXNoZS1jYW5ub3QtYmUtc2lsZW50LWlmLXJveWFsLWZhbWlseS1pcy1wZXJwZXR1YXRpbmctZmFsc2Vob29kcy0xMjIzNTMyMNIBc2h0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2FtcC9tZWdoYW4tc2F5cy1zaGUtY2Fubm90LWJlLXNpbGVudC1pZi1yb3lhbC1mYW1pbHktaXMtcGVycGV0dWF0aW5nLWZhbHNlaG9vZHMtMTIyMzUzMjA?oc=5

2021-03-04 06:56:15Z
52781415449045

Rabu, 03 Maret 2021

Buckingham Palace to investigate Meghan 'bullying' allegations - ITV News

Video report by ITV News Royal Editor Chris Ship


Buckingham Palace has said it will investigate the allegations of bullying made against the Duchess of Sussex.

The Times newspaper has reported allegations that during her time as a working royal, Meghan drove out two personal assistants and staff were “humiliated” on several occasions. Underlying Meghan’s actions, the paper claims, was the view of a number of sources that she wanted to be a “victim” so her “unbearable experience” would convince Harry they had to leave the UK – something her lawyers have denied. The monarchy’s “men in grey suits” have been accused of being aware of the alleged actions of the duchess and of doing “absolutely nothing to protect people”.


Times journalist Valentine Low, who first reported the story, gave his thoughts to ITV News earlier on Wednesday

Buckingham Palace said in a statement: “We are clearly very concerned about allegations in The Times following claims made by former staff of The Duke and Duchess of Sussex. “Accordingly our HR team will look into the circumstances outlined in the article. Members of staff involved at the time, including those who have left the Household, will be invited to participate to see if lessons can be learned.


“The Royal Household has had a Dignity at Work policy in place for a number of years and does not and will not tolerate bullying or harassment in the workplace.”

After the allegations emerged in The Times, a spokesperson for Harry and Meghan said: "The Duchess is saddened by this latest attack on her character particularly as someone who has been the target of bullying herself and is deeply committed to supporting those who have experienced this pain and trauma".


Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiYGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lml0di5jb20vbmV3cy8yMDIxLTAzLTAzL2J1Y2tpbmdoYW0tcGFsYWNlLXRvLWludmVzdGlnYXRlLW1lZ2hhbi1idWxseWluZy1hbGxlZ2F0aW9uc9IBAA?oc=5

2021-03-03 23:10:00Z
52781415449045