Selasa, 10 November 2020

GCSE and A-level exams in Wales cancelled for 2021 - BBC News

Pupils in classroom
Getty Images

Wales' GCSE, AS and A-level exams in summer 2021 are to be cancelled, with grades based on classroom assessments.

Education Minister Kirsty Williams said it was impossible to guarantee a level playing field for exams due to the ongoing impact of the Covid pandemic.

Head teachers would work on a "national approach" to ensure consistency, she said.

Assessments will be done under teacher supervision, and will begin in the second half of the spring term.

They will be externally set and marked but delivered within the classroom.

1px transparent line

She added cancelling exams would also give time for teaching to continue through the summer term.

Teachers would have flexibility on when to take the assessments, within the "context of results timelines".

However one teaching union questioned whether the announcement would mean ending up with "exams by stealth".

Why have the exams been cancelled?

Confirming the decision, Ms Williams said: "The wellbeing of learners and ensuring fairness across the system is central in our decision making process.

"We remain optimistic that the public heath situation will improve, but the primary reason for my decision is down to fairness; the time learners will spend in schools and colleges will vary hugely and, in this situation, it is impossible to guarantee a level playing field for exams to take place.

"We have consulted with universities across the UK and they have confirmed that they are used to accepting many different types of qualifications."

Ms Williams said it remained a "highly challenging year" but the announcement would remove pressures from learners and provide "clear time for teaching and learning".

What do students think?

Cerys Harris
Cerys Harris

A-level student Cerys Harris, 17, from Rhyl, has already had four weeks of self-isolation this term because of cases in her "bubble".

She wants to go to start a degree next September in England.

Although the education minister has said universities across the UK have confirmed they are "used to accepting many different types of qualifications", Cerys said she did not feel reassured, and was looking forward to more detail as to how the system is going to work.

"I've taken from [the announcement] that exams are cancelled, but it's not very straightforward," she told BBC Wales.

Fellow Rhyl A-level student Jonathon Dawes, who studies at Coleg Cambria and is also a member of the Welsh Youth Parliament, said he welcomed the decision, but was looking forward to getting more detail.

"I'm looking forward to more guidance coming out to make sure it's as fair and transparent as possible, to make sure pupils get the grades they deserve and it's not different from school to school."

'The right decision for young people'

Exam regulator Qualifications Wales, which advised the minister on her decision, said: "We recognise this has been a difficult decision and there are no easy answers. We are considering the decision and what it could mean in practice.

"In the meantime, we will provide advice to the Independent Design and Delivery Advisory Group."

  • 'I don't want exams to go ahead next year'
  • 'Scrap exams for 2021 after Covid disruption'

Children's Commissioner Sally Holland said Ms Williams had made the right decision.

She said: "This should be a year of learning, not worry. Young people should now rest assured that the decision will enable them to work towards their qualifications."

Her words were echoed by Eithne Hughes, director of the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL) Cymru, who said it would maximise "fairness" for students.

""This is the right decision for our young people," she added.

"It recognises the fact that they will have been affected to differing extents by the impact of the pandemic and it allows for as much teaching time as possible to catch-up with lost learning."

But the head of the school leaders' union NAHT raised concerns of ending up with "exams by stealth".

Ruth Davies said: "It has been announced that pupils will still be given externally set and marked tests, just in the classroom.

"We can't see how that isn't an exam. There is an awful lot of detail still to be determined, and we await further clarification, but we are worried we will end up with exams in all but name."

Who was consulted over the decision?

The 2020 exams were cancelled following the start of the first lockdown and results were eventually based on teacher-predicted grades.

Ms Williams said her decision for the 2021 exams came after she considered detailed advice from Qualifications Wales on available options as well as interim findings of a review of the 2020 exam process.

She also spoke to students, school and college leaders, universities and the children's commissioner.

She said: "In line with the recommendations of both Qualifications Wales and the Independent Review, there will be no exams for GCSE or AS level learners next year.

"A-level students will also not be required to sit exams."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiLGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXdhbGVzLTU0ODg4Mzc20gEwaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvYW1wL3VrLXdhbGVzLTU0ODg4Mzc2?oc=5

2020-11-10 12:31:00Z
52781179025712

GCSE and A-level exams in Wales cancelled for 2021 - BBC News

Pupils in classroom
Getty Images

Wales' GCSE, AS and A-level exams in summer 2021 are to be cancelled, with grades based on classroom assessments.

Education Minister Kirsty Williams said it was impossible to guarantee a level playing field for exams due to the ongoing impact of the Covid pandemic.

Head teachers would work on a "national approach" to ensure consistency, she said.

Assessments will be done under teacher supervision, and will begin in the second half of the spring term.

They will be externally set and marked but delivered within the classroom.

1px transparent line

She added cancelling exams would also give time for teaching to continue through the summer term.

Teachers would have flexibility on when to take the assessments, within the "context of results timelines".

However one teaching union questioned whether the announcement would mean ending up with "exams by stealth".

Who was consulted over the decision?

Ms Williams said she had considered detailed advice from the exam regulator Qualifications Wales on available options as well as interim findings of a review of the 2020 exam process.

She also spoke to students, school and college leaders, universities and the children's commissioner.

The 2020 exams were cancelled following the start of the first lockdown and results were eventually based on teacher-predicted grades.

Confirming the decision, Ms Williams said: "The well-being of learners and ensuring fairness across the system is central in our decision making process.

"In line with the recommendations of both Qualifications Wales and the Independent Review, there will be no exams for GCSE or AS level learners next year.

"A-level students will also not be required to sit exams.

"We remain optimistic that the public heath situation will improve, but the primary reason for my decision is down to fairness; the time learners will spend in schools and colleges will vary hugely and, in this situation, it is impossible to guarantee a level playing field for exams to take place.

"We have consulted with universities across the UK and they have confirmed that they are used to accepting many different types of qualifications."

Ms Williams said it remained a highly challenging year, adding: "What I have announced today sets a course which removes pressures from learners and provides clear time for teaching and learning.

"I now look to our schools, colleges, qualifications bodies, and the wider education sector to work cooperatively and collaboratively through the year to support our learners and enable them to progress with confidence."

'The right decision for young people'

Qualifications Wales, which advised the minister on her decision, said: "We recognise this has been a difficult decision and there are no easy answers. We are considering the decision and what it could mean in practice.

"In the meantime, we will provide advice to the Independent Design and Delivery Advisory Group."

Children's Commissioner Sally Holland said Ms Williams had made the right decision.

She said: "This should be a year of learning, not worry. Young people should now rest assured that the decision will enable them to work towards their qualifications."

Her words were echoed by Eithne Hughes, director of the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL) Cymru, who said it would maximise "fairness" for students.

""This is the right decision for our young people," she added.

"It recognises the fact that they will have been affected to differing extents by the impact of the pandemic and it allows for as much teaching time as possible to catch-up with lost learning."

But the head of the school leaders' union NAHT raised concerns of ending up with "exams by stealth".

Ruth Davies said: ""It has been announced that pupils will still be given externally set and marked tests, just in the classroom.

"We can't see how that isn't an exam. There is an awful lot of detail still to be determined, and we await further clarification, but we are worried we will end up with exams in all but name."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiKmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy91ay13YWxlcy01NDg4ODM3NtIBLmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy9hbXAvdWstd2FsZXMtNTQ4ODgzNzY?oc=5

2020-11-10 12:13:00Z
52781179025712

Chester hospital baby deaths probe: Nurse Lucy Letby rearrested - BBC News

Lucy Letby
SWNS

A nurse has been rearrested on suspicion of murdering eight babies and the attempted murder of another nine at the Countess of Chester Hospital.

Lucy Letby was previously arrested in July 2018 and June last year as part of an investigation into deaths at the hospital's neo-natal unit.

Cheshire Police has said it is investigating the deaths of 17 infants between 2015 and 2016.

Ms Letby, originally from Hereford, remains in custody.

The force said its investigation was "extremely challenging" but "very much active and ongoing".

Det Insp Paul Hughes said: "Parents of all the babies have been kept fully updated on this latest development and they are continuing to be supported throughout the process by specially trained officers.

"This is an extremely difficult time for all the families and it is important to remember that, at the heart of this, there are a number of bereaved families seeking answers as to what happened to their children."

Countess of Chester Hospital
Dennis Turner/Geograph

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiOWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLWVuZ2xhbmQtbWVyc2V5c2lkZS01NDg4NjIxM9IBPWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL2FtcC91ay1lbmdsYW5kLW1lcnNleXNpZGUtNTQ4ODYyMTM?oc=5

2020-11-10 10:14:00Z
52781179863699

Nurse is re-arrested on suspicion of murdering eight babies and trying to kill another nine - Daily Mail

Nurse is re-arrested on suspicion of murdering eight babies and trying to kill another nine at the Countess of Chester hospital neonatal unit

  • Lucy Letby was previously arrested in 2018 and 2019 and is in custody again
  • Cheshire Police said today she was helping officers with their enquiries
  • The investigation into the tragedies has been running for more than three years 

A healthcare professional has been re-arrested on suspicion of murdering eight babies and trying to kill another nine at a neonatal unit. 

The woman, arrested on Tuesday, is understood to be nurse Lucy Letby, who was previously arrested in 2018 and 2019 over the tragedies at the Countess of Chester Hospital.

Detective Chief Inspector Paul Hughes, of Cheshire Police, said: 'In July 2018, a healthcare professional was arrested on suspicion of murder in relation to the deaths of eight babies and the attempted murder of six babies at the neonatal unit at the Countess of Chester Hospital. She was subsequently bailed pending further inquiries.

'In June 2019, the healthcare professional was re-arrested on suspicion of murder in relation to the deaths of eight babies and the attempted murder of six babies. She was also arrested in connection with the attempted murder of three additional babies.

'Today, as part of our ongoing inquiries, the healthcare professional has been re-arrested on suspicion of murder in relation to the deaths of eight babies and the attempted murder of nine babies.

'The woman is currently in custody helping officers with their inquiries.' 

Lucy Letby, pictured, has been re-arrested on suspicion of murdering eight babies and trying to kill another nine at the Countess of Chester Hospital neo-natal unit

Lucy Letby, pictured, has been re-arrested on suspicion of murdering eight babies and trying to kill another nine at the Countess of Chester Hospital neo-natal unit

Detectives launched an investigation into infant deaths at the hospital in May 2017, initially looking at the deaths of 15 babies between June 2015 and June 2016.

The probe later widened to the deaths of 17 babies and 16 non-fatal collapses between March 2015 and July 2016.

Following her previous arrests, Letby's home in the Blacon area of Chester was searched by police.

In a 2013 interview with the Chester and District Standard newspaper, the nurse, originally from Hereford, said she cared for babies requiring various levels of support.

She had worked at the unit as a student nurse during three years of training before qualifying as a children's nurse at the University of Chester in 2011.

Letby said she started working at the unit after graduating.

DCI Hughes added: 'Parents of all the babies have been kept fully updated on this latest development and they are continuing to be supported throughout the process by specially trained officers.

'This is an extremely difficult time for all the families and it is important to remember that, at the heart of this, there are a number of bereaved families seeking answers as to what happened to their children.  

A police car outside the Women & Children's Bulding at the Countess of Chester hospital when Letby was re-arrested in 2019

A police car outside the Women & Children's Bulding at the Countess of Chester hospital when Letby was re-arrested in 2019

'Due to the nature of this investigation it is extremely challenging but it is important to remember that, despite the passage of time, it is very much active and ongoing. There are no set timescales and we remain committed to carrying out a thorough investigation.

'We fully appreciate that it continues to have a big impact on all those involved - including the families of the babies, staff and patients at the hospital as well as members of the public.'

Anyone with information should contact the investigation team at at operation.hummingbird@cheshire.pnn.police.uk or call police on 101 or anonymously, via Crimestoppers, on 0800 555 111. 

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMidmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmRhaWx5bWFpbC5jby51ay9uZXdzL2FydGljbGUtODkzMzAyOS9OdXJzZS1hcnJlc3RlZC1zdXNwaWNpb24tbXVyZGVyaW5nLWVpZ2h0LWJhYmllcy10cnlpbmcta2lsbC1uaW5lLmh0bWzSAXpodHRwczovL3d3dy5kYWlseW1haWwuY28udWsvbmV3cy9hcnRpY2xlLTg5MzMwMjkvYW1wL051cnNlLWFycmVzdGVkLXN1c3BpY2lvbi1tdXJkZXJpbmctZWlnaHQtYmFiaWVzLXRyeWluZy1raWxsLW5pbmUuaHRtbA?oc=5

2020-11-10 09:51:00Z
52781179863699

We WON'T back down! Legal loophole means House of Lords CAN block Brexit bill, says Adonis - Express

The House of Lords voted against certain clauses of the UK Internal Market Bill on Monday and will do so again if those elements remain. Bills often 'ping-pong' back and forth between the Lords and the Commons before eventually being passed due to the Salisbury Convention. This convention means Lords cannot oppose any Government legislation which was promised in an election manifesto.

But one Lord has claimed because Mr Johnson's proposal was not explicitly detailed in the 2019 manifesto, peers are within their right to block the bill even if it returns to the Lords from the Commons.

Within the election manifesto, Mr Johnson pledged to ‘get Brexit done’ and pump money back into the UK following the completion of the process.

Critics argue the context of the Internal Markets Bill was not included in the manifesto pledge.

Following the vote, arch-Remainer and Labour peer, Lord Adonis said: “I’m virtually certain the House of Lords won’t now back down in its rejection of the key breaches of international law in the Internal Market Bill.

“Ken Clarke and Michael Howard both said as much yesterday, leading 44 Tory rebels as part of the majority of 268 against Johnson.

“Under the ‘Salisbury convention’ the Lords must ultimately pass measures in the government’s election manifesto.

“But in this case Johnson’s proposal was not in his manifesto.

“Rather, the opposite was promised in his manifesto!

JUST IN: POLL: Should House of Lords be DISBANDED after yet another vote

In a further tweet, Lord Adonis claimed the UK Government must now revert its policy in order to deal with the economic crisis “engulfing” the country.

He said: “The right immediate policy on Brexit, in the economic crisis now engulfing us, is this: we should seek, during a further extension, to renegotiate the Withdrawal Agreement to remain in the Customs Union and retain as full access to the Single Market as possible.”

In particular, the Internal Market Bill violates requirements on state aid and customs-exit declarations within the withdrawal agreement.

It is for this reason, that notable peers such as Lord Michael Howard and Lord Ken Clarke voted against the legislation.

Lord Howard said: “What ministers have done is make the case that circumstances make it expedient to break international law.”

Indeed, former Tory Prime Minister, Sir John Major insisted the legislation had damaged the reputation of the country.

In a speech to Middle Temple, one of the professional associations for barristers, said it also risks peace in Northern Ireland.

He said: “This action is unprecedented in all our history — and for good reason

“It has damaged our reputation around the world.

“Lawyers everywhere are incredulous that the UK — often seen as the very cradle of the rule of law — could give themselves the power to break the law.”

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiemh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmV4cHJlc3MuY28udWsvbmV3cy91ay8xMzU4MzA2L0JyZXhpdC1uZXdzLWhvdXNlLW9mLWxvcmRzLWJvcmlzLWpvaG5zb24taW50ZXJuYWwtbWFya2V0LWJpbGwtbG9yZC1hZG9uaXMtcmVtYWlu0gF-aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZXhwcmVzcy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLzEzNTgzMDYvQnJleGl0LW5ld3MtaG91c2Utb2YtbG9yZHMtYm9yaXMtam9obnNvbi1pbnRlcm5hbC1tYXJrZXQtYmlsbC1sb3JkLWFkb25pcy1yZW1haW4vYW1w?oc=5

2020-11-10 09:24:00Z
52781179768508

POLL: Should House of Lords be DISBANDED after yet another Brexit-blocking vote? - Express

It marks just the latest instance of the House - made up of unelected peers - blocking a key Brexit policy after being passed in the Commons. Combined with eye-watering daily allowances and archaic traditions, the vote will increase calls for the House of Lords to be reformed or even disbanded completely. Do you think the House of Lords should be scrapped?

On Monday night, the House of Lords voted 433 to 165 on the first amendment and then in the second relating to the Northern Ireland Protocol, 407 to 148 to strip key pieces of legislation from the Internal Market Bill.

The UK Government has stated the bill is essential in maintaining the integrity of the internal market and is a safety net if negotiations with the EU breakdown.

Despite voting against the legislation, when in the Commons, the legislation was passed by MPs by 340 votes to 256.

The peers voted to remove key clauses within the bill which would allow the UK Government to break certain elements of the withdrawal agreement – which was signed in October.

Ahead of Monday’s vote, the legislation was widely expected to be blocked in the Upper House with Tory peers such as former leader, Lord Michael Howard claiming he would vote against it.

Due to the elements within the withdrawal agreement relating to customs-exit declarations and state aid, peers declared the legislation as breaking international law.

Although the peers voted to remove key pieces of the Internal Market Bill, a spokesman for No10 stated the clauses will be re-tabled when it returns to the Commons in the coming weeks.

They said following the vote last night: “We are disappointed that the House of Lords has voted to remove clauses from the UK Internal Market Bill, which was backed in the House of Commons by 340 votes to 256 and delivers on a clear Conservative manifesto commitment.

JUST IN: Boris fires final warning to EU as talks on brink

The EU has demanded the Government remove the legislation and has even sent a legal notice to the UK to do so.

Amid the controversy over the legislation, DUP and Sinn Fein leaders sent a letter to the EU Commission warning of additional checks on food entering Northern Ireland.

Under the Northern Ireland Protocol, food and animal-derived products entering the country from Great Britain will be subject to EU food safety requirements.

Due to these checks, the leaders claimed the threat to crucial food supplies is "unacceptable”.

Writing to EU Commission Vice President, Maros Sefcovic, the leaders said: “Last week, there was a meeting that included representatives from our main supermarkets here.

"These representatives have emphasised how critical the current situation is, with a real threat to the continuity of the supply of existing food and other products to our market unless these issues are urgently addressed and solutions found.

"This is an unacceptable situation for us to be in, especially so late in the process."

This is not the first time the peers have moved to vote against the Government.

In October, peers rejected sections of the UK Internal Market Bill 395 to 169, a majority of 226.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMib2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmV4cHJlc3MuY28udWsvbmV3cy91ay8xMzU4MjY3L0JyZXhpdC1uZXdzLWJvcmlzLWpvaG5zb24tdWstaW50ZXJuYWwtbWFya2V0LWJpbGwtaG91c2Utb2YtbG9yZHMtdm90ZdIBc2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmV4cHJlc3MuY28udWsvbmV3cy91ay8xMzU4MjY3L0JyZXhpdC1uZXdzLWJvcmlzLWpvaG5zb24tdWstaW50ZXJuYWwtbWFya2V0LWJpbGwtaG91c2Utb2YtbG9yZHMtdm90ZS9hbXA?oc=5

2020-11-10 07:58:00Z
52781179768508

Brexit Britain ready to go it ALONE! Boris fires final warning to EU as talks on brink - Express

Britain will sever ties with the European Union on December 31 unless a deal can be struck by the middle of this month.

But Downing Street again highlighted the "significant gaps" that remain between the two sides with fishing rights a key stumbling block.

The Prime Minister's official spokesman said: "The PM would like us to do a deal, and that's what we have been working to achieve, and we will carry on working to find solutions that fully respect the UK's sovereignty.

"But, equally, people should get ready for January 1 with arrangements which are more like Australia's."

 

Australia does not have a comprehensive trade deal with the European Union and trading with the bloc under such terms would involve the imposition of tariffs.

The spokesman added: "Time is now very short and any agreement needs to be in place before the end of  the transition period."

If no deal was reached Mr Johnson remained "confident we will be ready",  he said.

As talks in London intensified EU chief negotiator Michel Barnier dangled the threat of crippling trade tariffs over British exporters unless Mr Johnson caves in over fishing rights.

 

The Frenchman is understood to have told close allies that British hauliers and airlines could have access blocked to the EU single market if European fishermen are not granted “fair access to British waters”.

According to sources, Mr Barnier told the meeting: "I'm pitting one against the other. European access to British waters and British access to the single market."

Mr Barnier has recently found himself under increasing pressure from EU governments, led by France’s Emmanuel Macron, to stick with the bloc’s intransigent fishing demands.

EU hardliners want to maintain the same level of access for European boats to Britain’s coastal waters after Brexit.

But Mr Barnier has urged capitals to give him the flexibility in order to find a “compromise” position acceptable to Downing Street.

 

Environment Secretary George Eustice yesterday hinted at a possible compromise if Brussels agrees to recognise the UK’s independent coastal status.

He said Downing Street was “not giving ground” on reclaiming control of Britain’s fishing grounds but suggested EU fleets could be granted access on a multi-annual basis.

Mr Johnson’s negotiating strategy was drawn into question by his predecessor, Sir John Major, last night.

Speaking via a recorded message to the Middle Temple’s 2020 Lecture Series, Sir John said: “We were promised a comprehensive trade deal with the EU. We were told this would be ‘the easiest deal in history’ because ‘we hold all the cards’.

“Apparently not. As the politics changed, the promises were ditched. We can now look forward to a flimsy, barebones deal – or no deal at all. This is a wretched betrayal of what our electors were led to believe. It now seems that on 1 January next year, Brexit may be even more brutal than anyone expected.”

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiYGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmV4cHJlc3MuY28udWsvbmV3cy91ay8xMzU4MjUyL0JyZXhpdC1sYXRlc3QtYm9yaXMtam9obnNvbi1ldS10cmFkZS10YWxrcy1icmV4aXQtbmV3c9IBZGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmV4cHJlc3MuY28udWsvbmV3cy91ay8xMzU4MjUyL0JyZXhpdC1sYXRlc3QtYm9yaXMtam9obnNvbi1ldS10cmFkZS10YWxrcy1icmV4aXQtbmV3cy9hbXA?oc=5

2020-11-10 07:21:00Z
52781172893453