Minggu, 20 September 2020

Chris Whitty will warn Britain is at 'a critical point in pandemic' - Daily Mail

Chris Whitty will warn Britain is at 'a critical point in pandemic' and faces 'very challenging winter' in TV address TOMORROW before Boris Johnson reveals new crackdown measures this week with pubs that break the rules being shut down on the SPOT

  • Professor Chris Whitty will warn the nation is at 'a critical point in the pandemic'
  • Pubs that break coronavirus guidelines and rules could be shut down on the spot
  • New Government plans will encourage police to perform spot checks on venues
  • Last night Downing Street warned the country is 'in the last chance saloon'

The UK is at a 'critical point' in the coronavirus pandemic, Professor Chris Whitty will warn in an address to the nation tomorrow as the Prime Minister lays out new measures to control a second devastating wave of coronavirus.

In a televised briefing on Monday, the chief medical officer for England will say the country faces a 'very challenging winter', with the current trend heading in 'the wrong direction'. 

His stark warning calling for tougher controls comes after Boris Johnson yesterday held talks with Professor Whitty and chief scientific adviser Sir Patrick Vallance as he draws up a virus battle plan for the next six months.

It is thought the Prime Minister could announce new measures in a press conference as early as Tuesday. 

The new measures comes after the Mail revealed that pubs that break the rules will be shut down on the spot in a planned new crackdown. 

Bars and restaurants that allow big groups to gather or fail to collect customers' details will be served with orders forcing them to close immediately. Pictured: People hit the town last night in Nottingham

Bars and restaurants that allow big groups to gather or fail to collect customers' details will be served with orders forcing them to close immediately. Pictured: People hit the town last night in Nottingham

Local authorities and the police will be encouraged to perform spot checks to ensure venues are meeting the requirements. Pictured: a group of girls walk through Birmingham City Centre last night

Local authorities and the police will be encouraged to perform spot checks to ensure venues are meeting the requirements. Pictured: a group of girls walk through Birmingham City Centre last night

Professor Chris Whitty will say the country faces a 'very challenging winter' during his TV announcement

Professor Chris Whitty will say the country faces a 'very challenging winter' during his TV announcement

During his address, Professor Whitty, who will appear alongside the Government's chief scientific adviser Sir Patrick Vallance, will explain how the virus is spreading in the UK and the potential scenarios that could unfold as winter approaches.

They will draw on data from other countries such as Spain and France, which are experiencing a second surge, to underline how their experience could be replicated in the UK.

Professor Whitty is expected to say: 'The trend in the UK is heading in the wrong direction and we are at a critical point in the pandemic.

London 'next for lockdown' 

London is on the brink of lockdown, with millions of commuters set to be ordered to work from home.

Ministers will decide today whether to impose a lockdown on the capital, with Mayor Sadiq Khan pressing for 'fast action'.

Mr Khan believes the city is just days behind the disease hotspots in the North West and North East of England and said a new lockdown is 'increasingly likely'.

But London's infection rate of 25 cases per 100,000 people is significantly lower than the national average of 34 and no areas of the capital are on Public Health England's 'watchlist'.

Advertisement

'We are looking at the data to see how to manage the spread of the virus ahead of a very challenging winter period.'

The warning comes as it was revealed that bars and restaurants that allow big groups to gather or fail to collect customers' details will be served with orders forcing them to close immediately.

Local authorities and the police will be encouraged to perform spot checks to ensure venues are meeting the requirements.

Downing Street last night warned the country is 'in the last chance saloon' with the prospect of more restrictive national measures, such as curfews, being imposed within days if people do not start following the rules.       

Possible measures include forcing bars and restaurants to shut at 10pm each night, as has already happened in places such as Bolton and Newcastle. There may also be a ban on socialising with people from other households.

The Government is preparing to launch a major offensive to enforce the rules that are currently in place in a bid to minimise the need for further restrictions.

Mr Hancock yesterday warned: 'We will come down hard on people who do the wrong thing.'

Senior Government officials have become concerned at scenes of drinkers crammed into bars or standing on the street outside in large groups.

They also fear that many places are not collecting the details of customers needed by the NHS Test and Trace service to contact the necessary people if outbreaks are identified in a venue. 

On Sunday, another 3,899 lab-confirmed cases of coronavirus in the UK were announced, while a further 18 people died within 28 days of testing positive, bringing the UK total to 41,777. 

The latest figures came after the Government announced that anyone in England refusing to obey an order to self-isolate could face a fine of up to £10,000.

Following the rising figures, Health Secretary Matt Hancock refused to rule out a second national lockdown in England if people failed to follow the social distancing rules. 

Mr Hancock said that with hospital admissions for the disease doubling 'every eight days or so', further action was needed to prevent more deaths.

'This country faces a tipping point,' he told BBC One's The Andrew Marr Show.

'If everybody follows the rules - and we will be increasingly stringent on the people who are not following the rules - then we can avoid further national lockdowns.

'But we of course have to be prepared to take action if that's what's necessary.'

Mr Johnson has been desperate to avoid another nationwide lockdown amid concerns about the economic damage it will inflict just as activity was beginning to pick up again.

However, as of Tuesday, about 13.5 million people across the UK will be facing some form of local restrictions as the authorities grapple with the disease. 

Mr Hancock said he was 'very worried' about the latest data which suggested Britain could be on the same path as Spain and France - where deaths and hospitalisations are increasing - without effective action. 

Boris Johnson yesterday held talks with Professor Whitty and chief scientific adviser Sir Patrick Vallance

Boris Johnson yesterday held talks with Professor Whitty and chief scientific adviser Sir Patrick Vallance 

'I am very worried about this second wave. We have seen in other countries around Europe how it can absolutely shoot through the roof,' he said.

'When the case rate shoots up, the next thing that happens is the numbers going into hospital shoot up.

'Sadly, we have seen that rise, it is doubling every eight days or so - people going into hospital, then, with a lag, you see the number of people dying sadly rise.'

Among the measures being considered by ministers is a temporary two-week 'circuit break', with tighter restrictions across England in an attempt to break the chain of transmission.

Earlier today, London Mayor Sadiq Khan also pressed ministers to extend the controls to the capital, which he believes may be just 'two or three days' behind the hotspots of the North West and North East of England. 

However, the Government is facing resistance from some senior Conservative MPs concerned that ministers are taking increasingly stringent powers with little or no parliamentary scrutiny. 

Sir Graham Brady, chairman of the powerful Tory backbench 1922 Committee, said he will table an amendment which would require the Government to put any new measures to a vote of MPs. 

He indicated that he would take the opportunity to seek to amend the legislation when the Government comes to renew the emergency powers in the Coronavirus Act 2020. 

Under the latest rules, from September 28 people in England will have a duty to self isolate for 14 days if they test positive for coronavirus, or they are instructed to do by NHS Test and Trace because they have been in contact with someone with the disease.

Fines for non-compliance will start at £1,000, rising to £10,000 for repeat offenders in the most 'egregious' cases.

People on benefits will be eligible for a one-off support payment of £500 if they face a loss of earnings as a result of being required to quarantine. 

Sir Keir Starmer said Labour would support the measures but warned that a second national lockdown was becoming more likely because the Test and Trace programme was in a state of 'near collapse'.

'Because the Government's now effectively lost control of testing, it doesn't necessarily know where the virus is.

'So if I was the prime minister, I would apologise for the fact that testing is all over the place,' he told Sky News's Sophy Ridge on Sunday programme. 

Since Friday, local authorities in England have had the power to issue fines of up to £4,000 on businesses that allow in groups of more than six people or fail to keep a record of those served. 

But the Mail understands the Government is considering going further by giving councils the ability to take swift action by ordering immediate closure of premises.

Ministers are also looking at tightening the law so people are banned from ordering at the bar or counter. Retailers will be asked to encourage customers to comply with the requirement to wear a face covering in shops. 

The Mail understands the Government is considering going further by giving councils the ability to take swift action by ordering immediate closure of premises. Pictured: Revellers hit the town on Saturday night in Newcastle

The Mail understands the Government is considering going further by giving councils the ability to take swift action by ordering immediate closure of premises. Pictured: Revellers hit the town on Saturday night in Newcastle

Mr Hancock (pictured) said that there was a danger the numbers could ‘shoot through the roof’ unless effective action was taken to halt the spread of the virus

Mr Hancock (pictured) said that there was a danger the numbers could 'shoot through the roof' unless effective action was taken to halt the spread of the virus

A Cabinet minister said: 'People have been registering in pubs as Donald Duck and providing made-up phone numbers, or not giving any contact details at all. So a crackdown is needed.' 

From next week people will face fines of up to £10,000 if they refuse an order to self-isolate. Professor Whitty and Sir Patrick will present data on countries experiencing a second wave, such as France and Spain, and how this could be replicated here. 

A Downing Street source said: 'Infection rates are going up, we are in the grip of a second Covid wave and we're now in the last chance saloon.'

They said Professor Whitty and Sir Patrick 'will today set out the latest data and the stark reality we're now facing'.

Mr Hancock said that there was a danger the numbers could 'shoot through the roof' unless effective action was taken to halt the spread of the virus.

Appearing on Sky's Sophy Ridge on Sunday programme, he said 'people have got more relaxed over the summer' but 'now is the moment when everybody needs to get back' to following the rules.

Another 18 deaths were reported among people who had tested positive for coronavirus in the past 28 days. Last night there were 1,141 patients in England's hospitals, up from 1,048 the day before and 661 a week ago.

Nearly a third of these patients are in the North West, while just 157 are in London.

Back in April, there were almost 5,000 coronavirus patients in London hospitals alone, and 20,000 across the UK. 

Hancock: I'd shop neighbour 

Matt Hancock has told Britons to alert the police about neighbours who refuse to self-isolate – and said he would too.

The Health Secretary's call came only days after Prime Minister Boris Johnson said he disliked 'sneak culture'.

Mr Hancock declared he would report rule-breakers to the authorities himself in a move which could see them fined up to £10,000 under stringent new rules in England.

Matt Hancock (pictured) has told Britons to alert the police about neighbours who refuse to self-isolate – and said he would too

Matt Hancock (pictured) has told Britons to alert the police about neighbours who refuse to self-isolate – and said he would too

His comments came when he was asked on Times Radio if the public should tell on people refusing to self-isolate. 'Yes, because the number asked to self-isolate as a proportion of the population as a whole is relatively small and it's so important,' said Mr Hancock.

'These are people who have been in close contact with somebody who had a positive result or themselves have had a positive test.'

Mr Hancock was also asked by Andrew Marr on his BBC show if he would snitch on a neighbour to police himself.

The Health Secretary replied: 'Yes. And for the self-isolation part, that is absolutely necessary because that is how we break the chains of transmission.'

Mr Marr suggested it was 'confused messaging' from the Government after Mr Johnson's comments.

Mr Hancock replied: 'We're extremely clear that people must follow the rules and if they don't then we are bringing in this more stringent enforcement.'

Advertisement

A 'circuit breaker' lockdown would be madness

Commentary By Dr Renee Hoenderkamp

Of all the muddled, panicky, flip-flop responses by the Government to the Covid-19 pandemic, the introduction of a so-called 'circuit breaker' lockdown this week would be the worst yet.

Shutting down the country for two weeks will turn a dangerous situation into a disaster.

It's precisely the wrong thing to do, at exactly the wrong time.

Six months ago, when the coronavirus took hold in Britain, the Prime Minister imposed a draconian lockdown that forced people to stay indoors. I warned at the time that this policy would have a devastating long-term effect on general healthcare – especially mental health – and it saddens me deeply that I was proved right.

Six months ago, when the coronavirus took hold in Britain, the Prime Minister (pictured) imposed a draconian lockdown that forced people to stay indoors

Six months ago, when the coronavirus took hold in Britain, the Prime Minister (pictured) imposed a draconian lockdown that forced people to stay indoors

What I did not foresee, back in March, was how Covid-19 would be channelled by the lockdown into the very places that sheltered Britain's most vulnerable people: our care homes.

Segments of the population that were at minimal risk – the young and generally healthy – were the ones most protected against infection. The ones most at risk were left to bear the brunt and the results were unutterably horrific.

A lockdown that we were promised would not last more than a few weeks limped on for the whole summer. We didn't really emerge until this month, when the schools reopened.

And what happened? Exactly what anyone could predict – the disease re-emerged too. Of course it did, because it had never gone away. It had been circulating at a low level, waiting to surge back among a population with no degree of immunity. Now we are experiencing levels of rising infection similar to what we saw in February, at the start of the crisis.

But here's the awful difference: it's now late September and winter is on its way. With winter come flu and pneumonia, and as every GP knows, they are killers.

Britain does not shut down for flu every year. In fact, we barely talk about it. Some people have vaccines, others don’t bother – in seven of the past ten years, the jab has proved less than 50 per cent effective. Pictured: A sign for a coronavirus testing station in Manchester

Britain does not shut down for flu every year. In fact, we barely talk about it. Some people have vaccines, others don't bother – in seven of the past ten years, the jab has proved less than 50 per cent effective. Pictured: A sign for a coronavirus testing station in Manchester

Already, they are taking hold. Two weeks ago, according to the Office for National Statistics, 991 deaths were attributed to flu and pneumonia, Covid-19 or both over a seven-day period.

Yet in the same period, the ONS data showed only 78 official deaths of patients who tested positive for Covid-19 within the past month (though this doesn't mean the virus caused all the deaths).

These figures show that flu and pneumonia are currently roughly ten times as deadly... and according to the ONS, flu season hasn't even started yet.

The peak months are regarded as October to May, hitting the worst patch after Christmas. Britain does not shut down for flu every year. In fact, we barely talk about it. Some people have vaccines, others don't bother – in seven of the past ten years, the jab has proved less than 50 per cent effective.

Developing a reliable flu vaccine relies on predicting which particular strains of flu are most likely to appear the following winter so can be very off-target, yet this failure is almost never discussed in the media. It certainly is not the cause of national panic.

To be considering a country-wide lockdown to control Covid-19, when flu and pneumonia are currently so much more virulent, is sheer insanity. The dire effects on general and mental health which we suffered over the summer will simply be compounded.

Since there is little feasible chance of a safe and effective vaccine any time soon, we should have been striving for mass immunity among the healthy population. Pictured: A Coronavirus testing centre in Leicester

Since there is little feasible chance of a safe and effective vaccine any time soon, we should have been striving for mass immunity among the healthy population. Pictured: A Coronavirus testing centre in Leicester

And in two weeks' time, or whenever we disconnect the 'circuit breaker', the coronavirus will surge back. This time, we will be facing its effects during the flu season, when many more people will be compromised by flu and even less able to fight Covid-19.

The optimum time for dealing with this novel coronavirus has already passed. Since there is little feasible chance of a safe and effective vaccine any time soon, we should have been striving for mass immunity among the healthy population.

If the majority of people who are unlikely to suffer much ill effect could catch the infection, and get over it safely, they would be much less likely to transmit it to the vulnerable during the winter.

This strategy goes by the ugly name of herd immunity, an unfeeling name for the most compassionate policy.

I am certainly not belittling the severity of Covid-19. It is more contagious than common flu and it attacks the body in more varied ways. This is a scary disease. But we cannot fight it with fear.

We can’t wait for a vaccine, and we can’t hide from the virus. Trying to eradicate an endemic disease with a short ‘circuit breaker’ lockdown is unscientific nonsense (stock image)

We can't wait for a vaccine, and we can't hide from the virus. Trying to eradicate an endemic disease with a short 'circuit breaker' lockdown is unscientific nonsense (stock image)

We also cannot fight it at the moment with a vaccine. There isn't one, and I must admit that I would be wary of any inoculation that hasn't been thoroughly tested. I am ardently pro-vaccine, and I've made certain that my toddler got every jab going. But before they can be deemed safe, all drugs need to be properly evaluated, and that takes time.

We must not rush the job just because it's politically expedient. And yet the Government appears to be doing just that.

The only safe, humane response is to shield the vulnerable and encourage the rest of the population to build up collective immunity.

We can't wait for a vaccine, and we can't hide from the virus. Trying to eradicate an endemic disease with a short 'circuit breaker' lockdown is unscientific nonsense.

Instead, we need to look after the people at most risk, by ringfencing their jobs and paying their bills while they self-isolate.

Nobody should have to fear losing their employment or defaulting on their mortgage. The cost of this, while significant, would be minimal compared with the expense of the furlough scheme.

And while they stay safe, the rest of us need to get back into the real world and learn to live with the virus. It's here, and it's not going away. Our best defence is collective immunity. Accept it, and let's get on with our lives.

Dr Hoenderkamp is an NHS GP

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiemh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmRhaWx5bWFpbC5jby51ay9uZXdzL2FydGljbGUtODc1MzUxOS9Eb3duaW5nLVN0cmVldC10aHJlYXRlbnMtc2h1dC1iYXJzLWxldC1wZW9wbGUtZG9udC1jdXN0b21lcnMtZGV0YWlscy5odG1s0gF-aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZGFpbHltYWlsLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvYXJ0aWNsZS04NzUzNTE5L2FtcC9Eb3duaW5nLVN0cmVldC10aHJlYXRlbnMtc2h1dC1iYXJzLWxldC1wZW9wbGUtZG9udC1jdXN0b21lcnMtZGV0YWlscy5odG1s?oc=5

2020-09-20 21:02:23Z
CAIiECZGt96pnJ24Hx4ig-k2_9cqGQgEKhAIACoHCAowzuOICzCZ4ocDMKmaowY

Boris Johnson accused of jetting off abroad while UK reels from Covid second wave - Express

The Prime Minister is accused of travelling abroad during the weekend of September 12 and 13. An official statement from the local airport in Perugia, from September 17, claims that Mr Johnson was in Perugia “over the past few days”. Italian newspaper La Repubblica and publication Umbria24 claim airport sources told them that Mr Johnson travelled to Perugia” and he landed in Perugia "on Friday, September 11, at 2pm". La Republblica added a Number 10 spokesman said: "This claim is wrong."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMifGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmV4cHJlc3MuY28udWsvbmV3cy91ay8xMzM3OTcwL2JvcmlzLWpvaG5zb24tbmV3cy1JdGFseS1QZXJ1Z2lhLWNvcm9uYXZpcnVzLXNlY29uZC13YXZlLVVLLUNPVklELTE5LWRlYXRocy1sYXRlc3TSAYABaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZXhwcmVzcy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLzEzMzc5NzAvYm9yaXMtam9obnNvbi1uZXdzLUl0YWx5LVBlcnVnaWEtY29yb25hdmlydXMtc2Vjb25kLXdhdmUtVUstQ09WSUQtMTktZGVhdGhzLWxhdGVzdC9hbXA?oc=5

2020-09-20 21:27:00Z
CAIiEIEYMPD31GWzZHbC-ZWf0ysqGQgEKhAIACoHCAow9935CjCe0eYCMLXxzAU

Coronavirus: 'Critical point' in pandemic as UK infection rate heading in wrong direction, says chief medical officer - Sky News

England's chief medical officer, Professor Chris Whitty, has warned the rate of COVID-19 infections in the UK is "heading in the wrong direction".

On Monday, Professor Whitty and chief scientific adviser Sir Patrick Vallance will deliver a televised briefing on the latest coronavirus data.

According to Downing Street, they will explain how the coronavirus is currently spreading and set out "potential scenarios" for the months ahead.

They will not be joined by Prime Minister Boris Johnson or any members of the cabinet and will not take questions from journalists.

In a statement ahead of the briefing, Professor Whitty said the country was at "a critical point in the pandemic".

"We are looking at the data to see how to manage the spread of the virus ahead of a very challenging winter period," he added.

It comes as the health secretary warned the country was at a "tipping point" where "more restrictive measures" could be brought in to slow the spread of COVID-19.

More from Covid-19

During an interview on Sophy Ridge On Sunday, Matt Hancock said "people have got more relaxed over the summer" but "now is the moment when everybody needs to get back" to following the rules.

Crowd in Cirencester Market.
Is the UK ready for another lockdown?

He said he was "worried" too many people are breaching self-isolation guidance, leading to the government making it illegal in England.

Asked if he would report on his neighbours for breaking any of the emergency COVID-19 laws, Mr Hancock said: "Yes - and everybody should... Everybody has got a part to play in this."

Shoppers, some wearing a face mask or covering, walk past an electronic billboard displaying a UK Government advert advising the public to take precautions to mitigate the spread of COVID-19, in Newcastle city centre, north-east England, on September 17, 2020. - The British government on Thursday announced new restrictions for northeast England, the latest region to see a surge in coronavirus cases as Prime Minister Boris Johnson warned of a "second hump" in nationwide transmission. Residents in
The country has reached a 'tipping point'

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer said ministers had "lost control of the testing system".

He told Sophy Ridge: "If I was the prime minister, I would apologise for the fact that testing is all over the place and instead of using the summer to prepare for the autumn, which is what we said should happen, we're in this position just when we need testing to be at its very best, it's near collapse."

One option being considered by ministers is a short two-week lockdown that would see additional rules around household interactions and restrictions on the hospitality and leisure sectors, but not involve school closures.

Described as a "circuit break", the aim would be to impose tighter restrictions across England to curb the chain of transmission before it accelerates further.

A woman handing out leaflets promoting the new NHS Covid-19 app in Liverpool.
Image: Another lockdown has been described as a 'circuit break'

But Professor Carl Heneghan, of the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine at Oxford University, questioned whether the time was right for new restrictions.

"As we look at the data, COVID is operating in a seasonal way," he told Sophy Ridge. "So what we have to do now is slow down. This is a long winter," he added.

Professor Carl Heneghan says there is no evidence of a second wave of coronavirus
New lockdown 'should take place in winter'

Professor Heneghan continued: "We need it in the mid-winter when we might run into problems... it would be more explainable to people why we are doing it then than now, there's no evidence right now of what is called a 'second wave'.

"We cannot afford to go now with harsh measures because the impact on the economy here is going to be significant.

"If we go now it is too early."

The government is also facing resistance from some senior Conservative MPs who are threatening to rebel against further restrictions if they are not subject to greater parliamentary scrutiny.

:: Subscribe to the Daily podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker

Meanwhile, there have been another 3,899 lab-confirmed cases of coronavirus in the UK in the latest 24-hour period. Overall, 394,257 cases have been confirmed.

The government also said a further 18 people had died within 28 days of testing positive for COVID-19. This brings the UK total to 41,777.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMilQFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9jb3JvbmF2aXJ1cy1jcml0aWNhbC1wb2ludC1pbi1wYW5kZW1pYy1hcy11ay1pbmZlY3Rpb24tcmF0ZS1oZWFkaW5nLWluLXdyb25nLWRpcmVjdGlvbi1zYXlzLWNoaWVmLW1lZGljYWwtb2ZmaWNlci0xMjA3NzQ4MtIBmQFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9hbXAvY29yb25hdmlydXMtY3JpdGljYWwtcG9pbnQtaW4tcGFuZGVtaWMtYXMtdWstaW5mZWN0aW9uLXJhdGUtaGVhZGluZy1pbi13cm9uZy1kaXJlY3Rpb24tc2F5cy1jaGllZi1tZWRpY2FsLW9mZmljZXItMTIwNzc0ODI?oc=5

2020-09-20 21:01:17Z
52781072910965

Coronavirus: London 'catching up' with Covid-19 hotspots - BBC News

Related Topics
  • Coronavirus pandemic
People walk along Camden High Street, amid the coronavirus disease
image copyrightReuters

London is "catching up" with Covid-19 hotspots in northern England, Mayor Sadiq Khan's office has said.

Data from a few days ago suggested London was two weeks behind those areas, but now it is said to show the gap has closed to two or three days.

Mr Khan said he would meet council leaders on Monday and then recommend counter measures to ministers.

Health Secretary Matt Hancock has said he would not rule out new restrictions in London to slow the virus's spread.

"The situation is clearly worsening," a spokesperson for Mr Khan said.

"Sadiq will meet council leaders tomorrow and any London-specific measures will be recommended to ministers following that.

People sit on steps at Piccadilly Circus, amid the coronavirus disease
image copyrightReuters

"The mayor wants fast action as we cannot risk a delay, as happened in March.

"It is better for both health and business to move too early than too late."

Measures in place in north-east and north-west England include a ban on meeting with other households or support bubbles in private homes and gardens, not socialising with those outside your household in public venues and using public transport only for essential purposes.

Pubs, restaurants and cafes are table service only and all leisure venues must shut at 22:00 BST. Care homes are closed to non-essential visitors except in end-of-life circumstances.

Mr Khan is also said to be looking at the possibility of asking those who are able to work from home to do so, which is in opposition to the government's policy of urging people to get back into offices.

A mayoral source told the Press Association: "It's clear that cases in London are only moving in one direction, we are now just days behind hotspots in the North West and North East. We can't afford more delay.

"Introducing new measures now will help slow the spread of the virus and potentially prevent the need for a fuller lockdown like we saw in March, which could seriously damage the economy once again."

Mr Hancock, who said he had spoken with the mayor over the weekend, told Times Radio he would not rule out advising people to work from home from some point next week.

Related Topics

More on this story

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiNWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLWVuZ2xhbmQtbG9uZG9uLTU0MjE4NTY20gE5aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvYW1wL3VrLWVuZ2xhbmQtbG9uZG9uLTU0MjE4NTY2?oc=5

2020-09-20 19:08:00Z
52781069316100

Keir Starmer squirms as Andrew Marr rips into Labour leader over furlough demand - Daily Express

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer was forced to defend the party's stance on extending the furlough scheme. While speaking to BBC's Andrew Marr, Sir Keir demanded that the scheme be extended to certain industries and jobs. Mr Marr argued this could cost more money as jobs that would otherwise cease to exist would be take up resources that could be spent elsewhere.

Mr Marr also demanded the Labour leader to clearly announce how much money Labour was proposing to be spent on extending the furlough scheme and for how long.

Mr Marr said: "One area you said the Government have got it wrong is on the furlough scheme.

"You want Furlough to be extended in all sorts of areas.

"How much more are you prepared to spend on furlough?"

DON'T MISS: BBC's Andrew Marr erupts after Starmer dodges Brexit questions

"It has cost £34 billion so far."

Sir Keir praised the initial furlough scheme but defended his stance it should be continued.

He said: "It has been a welcomed scheme and it has probably kept many businesses in business.

"But the idea of ending it all at the same time for all businesses and all sectors irrespective of the position they find themselves in doesn't make sense."

Growing frustrated, Mr Marr again pushed the Labour leader for a more detailed answer.

The BBC host demanded an answer to which sectors Sir Keir wanted to continue to receive furlough and for how long.

"But there is a cost to not doing it.

"The costs is that if otherwise good businesses go under and jobs are lost, we will have mass unemployment.

"That is a huge cost, a monetary cost, a societal cost and it leaves deep scars for years."

Mr Marr hit back that this could create a group of "zombie businesses" that would trap resources.

He said: "The problem with your policy is it allows businesses that would otherwise go under to keep going and keeps people stuck in those jobs.

"The OECD has talked about zombie jobs and zombie businesses.

"They say supporting jobs and companies as you say means trapping resources in non-productive firms and jobs."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMieGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmV4cHJlc3MuY28udWsvbmV3cy9wb2xpdGljcy8xMzM3ODkxL0tlaXItU3Rhcm1lci1BbmRyZXctTWFyci1sYWJvdXItcGFydHktZnVybG91Z2gtc2NoZW1lLWV4dGVuZC1uZXdzLWxhdGVzdNIBfGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmV4cHJlc3MuY28udWsvbmV3cy9wb2xpdGljcy8xMzM3ODkxL0tlaXItU3Rhcm1lci1BbmRyZXctTWFyci1sYWJvdXItcGFydHktZnVybG91Z2gtc2NoZW1lLWV4dGVuZC1uZXdzLWxhdGVzdC9hbXA?oc=5

2020-09-20 16:33:00Z
52781067525177

FinCEN Files: All you need to know about the documents leak - BBC News

Leaked documents involving about $2tn of transactions have revealed how some of the world's biggest banks have allowed criminals to move dirty money around the world.

They also show how Russian oligarchs have used banks to avoid sanctions that were supposed to stop them getting their money into the West.

It's the latest in a string of leaks over the past five years that have exposed secret deals, money laundering and financial crime.

What are the FinCEN files?

The FinCEN files are more than 2,500 documents, most of which were files that banks sent to the US authorities between 2000 and 2017. They raise concerns about what their clients might be doing.

These documents are some of the international banking system's most closely guarded secrets.

Banks use them to report suspicious behaviour but they are not proof of wrongdoing or crime.

They were leaked to Buzzfeed News and shared with a group that brings together investigative journalists from around the world, which distributed them to 108 news organisations in 88 countries, including the BBC's Panorama programme.

Hundreds of journalists have been sifting through the dense, technical documentation, uncovering some of the activities that banks would prefer the public not to know about.

A big pile of papers

Getty

FinCEN FilesSource: ICIJ

Two acronyms you need to know

FinCEN is the US Financial Crimes Investigation Network. These are the people at the US Treasury who combat financial crime. Concerns about transactions made in US dollars need to be sent to FinCEN, even if they took place outside the US.

Suspicious activity reports, or SARs, are an example of how those concerns are recorded. A bank must fill in one of these reports if it is worried one of its clients might be up to no good. The report is sent to the authorities.

Why does this matter?

If you are planning to profit from a criminal enterprise, one of the most important things to have in place is a way of laundering the money.

Laundering money is the process of taking dirty money - the proceeds of crimes such as drug dealing or corruption - and getting it into an account at a respected bank where it will not be linked with the crime.

The same process is needed if you are a Russian oligarch whom Western countries have taken sanctions against to stop you getting your money into the West.

Banks are supposed to make sure they don't help clients to launder money or move it around in ways that break the rules.

By law, they have to know who their clients are - it's not enough to file SARs and keep taking dirty money from clients while expecting the authorities to deal with the problem. If they have evidence of criminal activity they should stop moving the cash.

Fergus Shiel from the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) said the leaked files were an "insight into what banks know about the vast flows of dirty money across the globe".

He said the documents also highlighted the extraordinarily large amounts of money involved. The documents in the FinCEN files cover about $2tn of transactions and they are only a tiny proportion of the SARs submitted over the period.

What has been revealed?

  • HSBC allowed fraudsters to move millions of dollars of stolen money around the world, even after it learned from US investigators the scheme was a scam.
  • JP Morgan allowed a company to move more than $1bn through a London account without knowing who owned it. The bank later discovered the company might be owned by a mobster on the FBI's 10 Most Wanted list.
  • Evidence that one of Russian President Vladimir Putin's closest associates used Barclays Bank in London to avoid sanctions which were meant to stop him using financial services in the West. Some of the cash was used to buy works of art.
  • The UK is called a "higher risk jurisdiction" like Cyprus, according to the intelligence division of FinCEN. That's because of the number of UK registered companies that appear in the SARs. Over 3,000 UK companies are named in the FinCEN files - more than any other country.
  • The United Arab Emirates' central bank failed to act on warnings about a local firm which was helping Iran evade sanctions.
  • Deutsche Bank moved money launderers' dirty money for organised crime, terrorists and drug traffickers. More details (BuzzFeed News)
  • Standard Chartered moved cash for Arab Bank for more than a decade after clients' accounts at the Jordanian bank had been used in funding terrorism.

Why is this leak different?

There have been a number of big leaks of financial information in recent years, including:

The FinCEN papers are different because they are not just documents from one or two companies - they come from a number of banks.

They highlight a range of potentially suspicious activity involving companies and individuals and also raise questions about why the banks which had noticed this activity did not always act on their concerns.

FinCEN said the leak could impact on US national security, compromise investigations, and threaten the safety of institutions and individuals who file the reports.

But last week it announced proposals to overhaul its anti-money laundering programmes.

The UK has also unveiled plans to reform its register of company information to clamp down on fraud and money laundering.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiJmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLTU0MjI2MTA30gEqaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvYW1wL3VrLTU0MjI2MTA3?oc=5

2020-09-20 17:01:06Z
CBMiJmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLTU0MjI2MTA30gEqaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvYW1wL3VrLTU0MjI2MTA3

Coronavirus: Five things we learnt from this week's Sophy Ridge on Sunday - Sky News

The health secretary Matt Hancock has refused to rule out further "national action" and revealed talks are ongoing about possible London measures.

Here are five things we learnt from this week's Sophy Ridge on Sunday.

The UK is at a "tipping point" as coronavirus cases surge and Mr Hancock has said "national action" cannot be ruled out.

Mr Hancock told Sophy Ridge on Sunday: "The nation faces a tipping point and we have a choice and the choice is either that everybody follows the rules, or we will have to take more measures.

"And I don't want to see more measures, more restrictive measures, but unfortunately, if people don't follow the rules, that's how the virus spreads".

It's a stark warning from a government that has tiptoed between making clear it is desperate to avoid another full lockdown, and to stress it won't take the option off the table.

The UK has "seen in the data that some people who need to self-isolate" aren't doing so, something the health secretary was on the programme to warn against.

More from Boris Johnson

Asked if he would report someone breaking the rules (now putting them in line for a £10,000 fine), he said: "Yes, and everybody should."

"This is a really difficult moment," Mr Hancock added, and said that "in terms of a national action, of course we don't rule that out but everybody wants to avoid it".

With London's mayor Sadiq Khan calling for restrictions in the capital, he also confirmed he had "had discussions" with City Hall and further meetings would take place.

Labour leader calls for Boris Johnson to apologise

Sir Keir Starmer said "the government has now effectively lost control of testing" and Boris Johnson should apologise.

Labour's leader told Sophy Ridge: "I don't think a national lockdown is inevitable, although I think it's more likely because testing is all over the place.

"One of the concerns I have, is that because the government has now effectively lost control of testing, it doesn't necessarily know where the virus is.

"So if I was the prime minister, I would apologise for the fact that testing is all over the place. I would apologise, I would make fixing testing my first priority."

As case numbers spike, Sir Keir called for the daily coronavirus briefings to be brought back, saying: "I think the prime minister needs to reinstate the daily briefings, press briefings, so that everybody knows that's going on."

The Labour leader's approach of "constructive opposition" has clearly paid off as his party pulled level in the polls with the Conservatives this week. But apart from providing a leader billed as more competent, what exactly Mr Starmer wants for the country has yet to be defined.

A national lockdown is too early

Coronavirus cases may be on the rise, but as for a lockdown, "if we go now, it's too early", according to Oxford's Carl Heneghan.

The idea of a two-week 'circuit break' over an extended half-term holiday has been suggested, but the Oxford professor of evidence-based medicine said "there's no evidence right now of what's called a second wave" and any action should be delayed to December.

Mr Heneghan warned: "What we have to do now is slow down. This is a long winter, we cannot afford to go now with harsh measures.

"We have to understand the context of respiratory infections", the professor added, saying appointments for respiratory infections will go up "four-fold in a good year", between now and January and "in a bad year they'll go up eight-fold, as it gets colder, as we're inside more, there will be more coughs and colds".

"Therefore there may come a point in the winter when actually there is a need for restrictive measures.

"If I was talking about what the prime minister is talking about, a cycle break, I'd be looking at the Christmas break right now to extend it."

Care homes are just not ready

Care home bosses are "extremely concerned" about government policy that would allow people infected with coronavirus into facilities, according to Nadra Ahmed of the National Care Association (NCA).

"I have seen some correspondence from providers who have actually written to say they feel like they are being asked to take people," she said, adding: "We are really concerned, because we need those negative tests and then we need to test them again whilst they are in our service, so we need to have all that available to us."

Responding to figures showing outbreaks in care homes had surged from 35 two weeks ago to 228 last week, she said the virus was "beginning to move into" the sector.

With fears of untested visitors, the NCA chair said: "We are really concerned that the exposure is still there and we need to shut it all down. That's the thing, this is a shielded group of people and I think that needs to be taken much more seriously than it is at this moment in time."

You thought it was safe to go back in the water

COVID-19 may in the headlines but it's not the only thing in politics this week. Sir Keir Starmer "needs to listen to the left" or he will "steer the ship onto the rocks", Len McCluskey has warned.

The Corbyn-allied Unite general secretary said: "I'm not worried at the moment but of course, we will review the situation. My belief is that if he sticks to the kind of progressive, ambitious alternatives that have been developed under Labour in the last five years, then I think he will be our prime minister."

Asked what might happen if Sir Keir did not, he replied: "I think he'll be in trouble. He needs to listen to the left because without the left within our movement, he will I'm afraid, steer the ship onto the rocks."

It is a shot across Sir Keir's bows from the outgoing head of one of the most powerful Labour-supporting unions and a supporter of now-sacked rival Rebecca Long-Bailey for the party leadership.

:: Listen to Sophy Ridge on Sunday on Apple podcasts, Google podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker

Labour under Mr Starmer has made recent nods to the Corbyn era, including suggesting the pledge to end tuition fees will be kept, but has been careful not to commit itself to many specific policies.

Along with a jab at new slogan "A New Leadership" as "a bit meaningless although it's a statement of fact", Mr McCluskey's words are a reminder that the unions have their own opinions on what defines the Starmer era.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMia2h0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2Nvcm9uYXZpcnVzLWZpdmUtdGhpbmdzLXdlLWxlYXJudC1mcm9tLXRoaXMtd2Vla3Mtc29waHktcmlkZ2Utb24tc3VuZGF5LTEyMDc3MTQ50gFvaHR0cHM6Ly9uZXdzLnNreS5jb20vc3RvcnkvYW1wL2Nvcm9uYXZpcnVzLWZpdmUtdGhpbmdzLXdlLWxlYXJudC1mcm9tLXRoaXMtd2Vla3Mtc29waHktcmlkZ2Utb24tc3VuZGF5LTEyMDc3MTQ5?oc=5

2020-09-20 15:28:42Z
52781067525177