Senin, 14 September 2020

Brexit plea: MPs urged to show UK is 'not villain in EU exit negotiations' - Daily Express

Paul Goodman, who was MP for Wycombe between 2001 and 2010, urged those voting on the bill to pass it, despite outrage among some politicians over claims it breaks international law. Prime Minister Boris Johnson and his Brexit team have reviewed aspects of the withdrawal agreement, particularly surrounding Northern Ireland, should the EU and UK fail to reach a future trade deal. The move sparked fury with the likes of former Attorney General Geoffrey Cox claiming he would vote against the Government's bill, before accusing Mr Johnson of causing "unconscionable" damage to the UK's reputation across the world.

The new bill, if passed, would counteract the pact agreed by Brussels and the UK earlier this year, leading critics such as Northern Ireland Secretary Brandon Lewis to say the move would "break international law" in a "specific and limited way".

The current withdrawal agreement, now an international treaty, enshrined the Northern Ireland Protocol.

This was created to ensure there would be no hard border returning across Ireland and Northern Ireland.

But the Government's proposal would go against that pledge, which saw tensions erupt across the political spectrum.

Yet, ConservativeHome editor Mr Goodman argues that it would be more beneficial for MPs to approve the bill as it was the "least bad way forward" for the UK.

He wrote for the website: "We believe that the UK should not be the first party in a dispute to break international law – let alone present itself in that light.

"So the least bad way forward now is for MPs to vote for amendments which would guarantee all MPs rather than some a vote on any triggering of the contested clauses."

Mr Goodman argued that by passing the amendments, the UK would be sending a message to "three audiences".

JUST IN: Tony Blair sparks furious reaction over bid to stop Boris' Brexit Bill

He continued: "First, to the courts: that any triggering would be the intention of the whole legislature.

"Second, to the Government: that it has bungled by casting the UK as a villain – and that, worse, its pre-election predecessor cocked up the state aid part of the negotiation, leaving us open to the European Courts of Justice (ECJ).

"Finally, to the EU. There can be no doubt that, if the negotiation collapses, and the Government then asserts that the EU has acted illegally, this Commons, with its Conservative majority of 80, would then swiftly vote to implement the contested clauses of this Bill."

The ex-MP added: "In sum, we believe that countries will sometimes be accused of breaking international law. If the UK eventually finds itself in that position by triggering these clauses, so be it.

DON'T MISS:
When taking Brexit moral highground hurts British we should avoid it  [COMMENT]
EU’s negotiating strategy dubbed ‘ridiculous’ from day one of talks [INSIGHT]
BBC's Victoria Derbyshire in fiery clash with Swayne over Brexit Bill [VIDEO]

"But it has been baffling to see the Government playing into the hands of the EU by casting itself as a law-breaker when its own version of events suggests it isn’t."

Other MPs have staked their claims as to why the changes needed to be made to the agreement.

The UK left the EU on January 31, and is currently in the midst of negotiating a future trade deal with the bloc, which will come into effect on December 31.

However, five former Prime Ministers condemned the Government's decision, with the likes of Sir John Major and Tony Blair accusing Mr Johnson of "embarrassing the UK".

They alleged that the Government's actions were "shameful", and wrote in the Sunday Times that it was "irresponsible, wrong in principle and dangerous in practice".

The EU also waded into the row, as Brussels warned the UK it may face legal action if it does not override the new elements proposed by September 30.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMihgFodHRwczovL3d3dy5leHByZXNzLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvcG9saXRpY3MvMTMzNTMzMi9icmV4aXQtbmV3cy1ldS10cmFkZS1kZWFsLWJvcmlzLWpvaG5zb24tdG9yeS1wYXJ0eS1VSy1wb2xpdGljcy1sYXRlc3QtcGF1bC1nb29kbWFuLXNwdNIBigFodHRwczovL3d3dy5leHByZXNzLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvcG9saXRpY3MvMTMzNTMzMi9icmV4aXQtbmV3cy1ldS10cmFkZS1kZWFsLWJvcmlzLWpvaG5zb24tdG9yeS1wYXJ0eS1VSy1wb2xpdGljcy1sYXRlc3QtcGF1bC1nb29kbWFuLXNwdC9hbXA?oc=5

2020-09-14 12:26:54Z
52781062222382

Coronavirus: Report your neighbours to police if they break rule of six, says minister - Sky News

People in England who see their neighbours flouting the new "rule of six" are being encouraged to contact police by the government.

Social gatherings of more than six people are now illegal in England from today.

People face fines of up to £3,200 if they do not abide by the new measure, which aims to curb an increase in COVID-19 cases.

A total of 3,330 confirmed coronavirus cases were recorded in the UK on Sunday - the first time since May that cases have been above 3,000 on three consecutive days.

As the new rule came into force, policing minister Kit Malthouse said concerned neighbours should ring the non-emergency police phone number to report violations of the restriction.

"We are in discussions about what reporting mechanisms there might be but there is obviously the non-emergency number that people can ring and report issues they wish to," he told the BBC Radio 4's Today programme.

"Certainly during the initial stage of lockdown, we did see a surge in those reports coming through to the police.

More from Covid-19

"If people are concerned, if they do think there is contravention then that option is open to them."

:: Subscribe to Sophy Ridge on Sunday on Apple podcasts, Google podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker

Pressed on whether that would involve reporting a gathering of seven or more in a neighbour's garden, Mr Malthouse said: "It is open to neighbours to do exactly that through the non-emergency number and if they are concerned and they do see that kind of thing, then absolutely they should think about it."

Asked to clarify whether residents should be concerned about local breaches of law in neighbouring properties and report them to the police, he replied: "Yes."

Regulations enabling the enforcement of the rule were published late on Sunday night, around 30 minutes before they came into effect.

Home Secretary Priti Patel said the new rule was "easier to understand and easier for the police to enforce".

Writing in The Sun newspaper, Ms Patel said the police "will be able to disperse gatherings of more than six people and fine individuals involved £100, doubling up to a maximum of £3,200 for repeat offenders".

"They will continue to hand down £10,000 fines for people hosting raves or other large unlawful events," she added.

"I know that, as part of our national effort, the law-abiding majority will stick to these new rules.

"But there will be a small minority who do not and the police have the necessary powers to take action against them.

"This disease is deadly and that is why it is right that the police enforce where people break the rules."

Downing Street suggested police would not immediately start imposing fines on people who break the "rule of six" restrictions.

The Prime Minister's official spokesman said: "What you would expect to happen is for the police to be out today encouraging people to follow the new rules but in the coming days, if we see people continuing to flout the new rules, it is right that people could face a fine.

"The regulations are in place to help to stop the spread of the virus, to protect the NHS and to ultimately save lives."

Asked whether people should report neighbours who breach coronavirus rules, the spokesman said: "What we want people to be focused on is following the new rules and ensuring that they, themselves, help again as they have in the past to slow the spread of the virus.

"What you have seen in recent weeks is some egregious flouting of the rules, such as the holding of large illegal parties, and members of the public have been contacting the police about those because they have been concerned about the risk to public health."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMieGh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2Nvcm9uYXZpcnVzLXJlcG9ydC15b3VyLW5laWdoYm91cnMtdG8tcG9saWNlLWlmLXRoZXktYnJlYWstcnVsZS1vZi1zaXgtc2F5cy1taW5pc3Rlci0xMjA3MTY3ONIBfGh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2FtcC9jb3JvbmF2aXJ1cy1yZXBvcnQteW91ci1uZWlnaGJvdXJzLXRvLXBvbGljZS1pZi10aGV5LWJyZWFrLXJ1bGUtb2Ytc2l4LXNheXMtbWluaXN0ZXItMTIwNzE2Nzg?oc=5

2020-09-14 12:22:30Z
52781061913318

Coronavirus: Report your neighbours to police if they break rule of six, says minister - Sky News

People in England who see their neighbours flouting the new "rule of six" are being encouraged to contact police by the government.

Social gatherings of more than six people are now illegal in England from today.

People face fines of up to £3,200 if they do not abide by the new measure, which aims to curb an increase in COVID-19 cases.

A total of 3,330 confirmed coronavirus cases were recorded in the UK on Sunday - the first time since May that cases have been above 3,000 on three consecutive days.

As the new rule came into force, policing minister Kit Malthouse said concerned neighbours should ring the non-emergency police phone number to report violations of the restriction.

"We are in discussions about what reporting mechanisms there might be but there is obviously the non-emergency number that people can ring and report issues they wish to," he told the BBC Radio 4's Today programme.

"Certainly during the initial stage of lockdown, we did see a surge in those reports coming through to the police.

More from Covid-19

"If people are concerned, if they do think there is contravention then that option is open to them."

:: Subscribe to Sophy Ridge on Sunday on Apple podcasts, Google podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker

Pressed on whether that would involve reporting a gathering of seven or more in a neighbour's garden, Mr Malthouse said: "It is open to neighbours to do exactly that through the non-emergency number and if they are concerned and they do see that kind of thing, then absolutely they should think about it."

Asked to clarify whether residents should be concerned about local breaches of law in neighbouring properties and report them to the police, he replied: "Yes."

Regulations enabling the enforcement of the rule were published late on Sunday night, around 30 minutes before they came into effect.

Home Secretary Priti Patel said the new rule was "easier to understand and easier for the police to enforce".

Writing in The Sun newspaper, Ms Patel said the police "will be able to disperse gatherings of more than six people and fine individuals involved £100, doubling up to a maximum of £3,200 for repeat offenders".

"They will continue to hand down £10,000 fines for people hosting raves or other large unlawful events," she added.

"I know that, as part of our national effort, the law-abiding majority will stick to these new rules.

"But there will be a small minority who do not and the police have the necessary powers to take action against them.

"This disease is deadly and that is why it is right that the police enforce where people break the rules."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMieGh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2Nvcm9uYXZpcnVzLXJlcG9ydC15b3VyLW5laWdoYm91cnMtdG8tcG9saWNlLWlmLXRoZXktYnJlYWstcnVsZS1vZi1zaXgtc2F5cy1taW5pc3Rlci0xMjA3MTY3ONIBfGh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2FtcC9jb3JvbmF2aXJ1cy1yZXBvcnQteW91ci1uZWlnaGJvdXJzLXRvLXBvbGljZS1pZi10aGV5LWJyZWFrLXJ1bGUtb2Ytc2l4LXNheXMtbWluaXN0ZXItMTIwNzE2Nzg?oc=5

2020-09-14 11:14:44Z
52781061913318

Keir Starmer goes into self-isolation after doing LBC phone-in - Daily Mail

Keir Starmer goes into self-isolation as member of household shows Covid symptoms - hours after Labour leader was in the LBC studios

  • Keir Starmer is self-isolating after a member of household showed symptoms 
  • Labour leader went into quarantine hours after doing a phone-in on LBC radio
  • Party said member of household has had a coronavirus test and result pending

Keir Starmer declared he is going into quarantine today after a member of his household showed coronavirus-type symptoms.

The Labour leader announced he is going into self-isolation hours after taking a phone-in in the LBC radio studios. 

The party has informed the radio station about the situation, but it is not yet clear whether presenter Nick Ferrari or other staff will need to quarantine.

Sir Keir lives with wife Victoria and their son and daughter, thought to be aged 10 and eight respectively, in north London. 

Boris Johnson's spokesman said he had called Sir Keir and passed on his best wishes. 'The PM gave his best wishes to Sir Keir and his family,' the spoksman said.  

Sir Keir Starmer sat relatively close to presenter Nick Ferrari in the radio studios today before he went into quarantine

Sir Keir Starmer sat relatively close to presenter Nick Ferrari in the radio studios today before he went into quarantine

Labour leader Keir Starmer announced he is going into self-isolation hours after taking a phone-in in the LBC radio studios

Labour leader Keir Starmer announced he is going into self-isolation hours after taking a phone-in in the LBC radio studios

Aides said Sir Keir has not shown any signs of the disease himself - although he did cough during the appearance - but will not be speaking in the Commons debate on Brexit later, when he was due to face off against Mr Johnson. 

A Labour spokesman said: 'This morning Keir Starmer was advised to self isolate after a member of his household showed possible symptoms of the coronavirus. The member of his household has now had a test.  

'In line with NHS guidelines, Keir will self-isolate while awaiting the results of the test and further advice from medical professionals.'

Is is understood Victoria works for the NHS, and her trust's policy to keep staff on duty is that they and their families can go straight to the hospital for a test if they display symptoms. 

Sources insisted the Starmer family had used the NHS rather than a private test, and received 'no special favours'. 

Sir Keir sat relatively close to presenter Nick Ferrari in the radio studios today before he went into quarantine. 

Commons Leader Jacob Rees-Mogg went into self-isolation last week after one of his six children started showing coronavirus symptoms.

Deputy chief whip Stuart Andrew stood in for Mr Rees-Mogg at business questions on Thursday.  

However, Mr Rees-Mogg has now been given the all clear and is back at work in Parliament. 

During the phone-in, Sir Keir said he supported the Government's new 'Rule of Six' restrictions which came into force today.

Commons Leader Jacob Rees-Mogg went into self-isolation last week after one of his six children started showing coronavirus symptoms - although he has now been given the all clear

Commons Leader Jacob Rees-Mogg went into self-isolation last week after one of his six children started showing coronavirus symptoms - although he has now been given the all clear

He said: 'I do support the 'rule of six'.

'I think you need something simple, easily understood and I think the Government was slow back in February and March to appreciate the problem it was about the face and we can't repeat that error again, so I do support the 'rule of six'.

'We've publicly come out in support of it and I will say, as I said to the Prime Minister I would, as the leader of the Opposition I say to everybody, please follow the Government advice, please follow these rules.'

He added: 'You can make the argument of why not five or why not six or seven – you have to go with a number backed by the science and they say six and I think we should abide by that rule.'

Sir Keir said ministers' 'side of the bargain' was to improve NHS Test and Trace and to ensure more people were self-isolating now that fresh social restrictions had been put in place.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiaWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmRhaWx5bWFpbC5jby51ay9uZXdzL2FydGljbGUtODczMDY1My9LZWlyLVN0YXJtZXItZ29lcy1zZWxmLWlzb2xhdGlvbi1kb2luZy1MQkMtcGhvbmUtaW4uaHRtbNIBbWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmRhaWx5bWFpbC5jby51ay9uZXdzL2FydGljbGUtODczMDY1My9hbXAvS2Vpci1TdGFybWVyLWdvZXMtc2VsZi1pc29sYXRpb24tZG9pbmctTEJDLXBob25lLWluLmh0bWw?oc=5

2020-09-14 12:13:41Z
52781060750589

Fifth ex-PM speaks out against post-Brexit bill - BBC News

Media playback is unsupported on your device

David Cameron has become the fifth former prime minister to criticise a new bill attempting to override the Brexit withdrawal agreement.

The Internal Market Bill will come before MPs later, with the government calling it an "insurance policy".

Mr Cameron said he had "misgivings" over it and breaking an international treaty should be the "final resort".

Former Tory PMs Theresa May and Sir John Major, and Labour's Tony Blair and Gordon Brown have condemned the plan.

Earlier, Policing Minister Kit Malthouse called it a "practical" step.

He echoed comments made by Justice Secretary Robert Buckland on Sunday, who said the bill was there just in case the UK and EU do not agree a post-Brexit trade deal.

Boris Johnson was expected to speak to reporters at an event later, but No 10 confirmed it had been cancelled due to urgent parliamentary business.

The government is expected to win a vote in the Commons later on the next stage of the bill - which should take place around 22:00 BST (21:00 GMT) - but it is also expected to face more difficulties in later stages, especially when the legislation heads for debate in the Lords.

Former Attorney General Geoffrey Cox has said he will vote against it, accusing Mr Johnson of doing "unconscionable" damage to Britain's international reputation.

A senior government source told the BBC "all options are on the table" in terms of possible action against Tory MPs who do not support the bill.

The PM's special envoy for Freedom of Religion or Belief, Tory MP Rehman Chishti, has resigned over the proposed law, saying: "I have always acted in a manner which respects the rule of law... [and] voting for this bill as it currently stands would be contrary to the values I hold dearest."

Labour's shadow business secretary, Ed Miliband, also called the proposed law "legislative hooliganism".

The UK left the EU on 31 January, having negotiated and signed the withdrawal agreement with the bloc.

The two sides are now in the closing weeks of negotiations for a post-Brexit trade deal before the transition period ends on 31 December - with informal talks taking place in Brussels this week.

A key part of the withdrawal agreement - which is now an international treaty - was the Northern Ireland Protocol, designed to prevent a hard border returning to the island of Ireland.

The Internal Market Bill proposed by the government would override that part of that agreement when it came to goods and would allow the UK to modify or re-interpret "state aid" rules on subsidies for firms in Northern Ireland, in the event of the two sides not agreeing a future trade deal.

Last week, Northern Ireland Secretary Brandon Lewis said the bill would "break international law" in a "specific and limited way", leading to swathes of criticism from all sides of the political spectrum.

Here we go again... a Brexit deadline looms, there's a whole lot of noise about it in Westminster, and the UK and the EU can't agree.

And yes, yet again, there is a swirling soup of jargon every other sentence.

Take a few steps back though, and here is what this all amounts to - how the UK will trade with its nearest neighbours from January next year onwards and how the different parts of the UK will trade with each other.

This matters economically - and matters politically too.

The Brexit process has long exposed the tensions between the UK and Brussels, but don't underestimate the tensions it places on the UK as well.

Those in Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales who have long argued to be unshackled from London, as they see it, argue Brexit is the ultimate case study to illustrate their argument.

And so the government at Westminster's delicate task is to extricate the UK from one union, the EU, while holding together another one, the UK.

All of these rows have that central aim at their core.

Mr Cameron - who called the EU referendum when he was PM - said he had "misgivings about what is being proposed".

Speaking to reporters, he said: "Passing an act of Parliament and then going on to break an international treaty obligation is the very, very last thing you should contemplate. It should be the absolute final resort."

Mr Cameron said the "bigger picture" was about trying to get a trade deal with the EU, urging the government to "keep that context [and] that big prize in mind."

The comments follow stronger criticism by the four other surviving former prime ministers of the UK.

Mrs May, who still sits as an MP in the Commons, said breaking international law would damage "trust" in the UK, while Mr Brown said it would be akin to "self-harm" for the country.

Sir John and Mr Blair - who were both in office during key periods of the Northern Ireland peace process - wrote a joint article in the Sunday Times accusing Mr Johnson of "embarrassing" the UK and urging MPs to reject the "shameful" attempt to override parts of the withdrawal agreement.

'Problem to solve'

Mr Malthouse defended the bill, saying it "solves the problem that we're faced with" over the future of trade with the EU.

He told BBC Breakfast: "What we've done is to say transparently that this is a situation which we think may occur - certainly that's what's being intimated from the EU. It's a problem we have to solve so here's a bill that solves it.

"In the end those people that oppose this bill have to tell us what the resolution is."

On Sunday, Justice Secretary Mr Buckland told the BBC he hoped powers being sought by ministers would never be needed, and that he would resign if the UK ended up breaking international law "in a way I find unacceptable".

But Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer accused government ministers of handing out "misinformation" over the weekend and "spinning" the reasons they were pursuing the new bill.

He told LBC: "[Mr Johnson] is making a mistake reneging on a treaty - that will have reputational damage for the UK.

"I would say to the prime minister, look go away, go back to the drawing board, drop these problems, don't act in this reckless and wrong way and we'll look again at the legislation."

Media playback is unsupported on your device

The bill has split opinion on the Tory backbenches.

MP Sir Desmond Swayne said he would be supporting the bill, praising the government for preparing in case no trade deal is agreed by the end of the year.

He told BBC News: "If the government didn't take precautions against that possibility, it would be utterly negligent. It is right it arm itself with the powers just in case."

But his colleague, and chair of the Justice Select Committee, Sir Bob Neill, said the government and its supporters needed to "calm the language".

He said there was already a mechanism for addressing the government's concerns, but he was willing to "meet them half-way" with an amendment to the bill - only allowing the elements that would break international law to be used if Parliament signs it off.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTU0MTQ1MjAy0gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvYW1wL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTU0MTQ1MjAy?oc=5

2020-09-14 11:15:00Z
52781062222382

Coronavirus: Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer self-isolating after household member showed COVID-19 symptoms - Sky News

Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer is self-isolating after a member of his household displayed possible coronavirus symptoms.

Sir Keir will now be working from home and will not speak in today's House of Commons debate on the government's controversial internal market legislation.

He is understood to have not shown any COVID-19 symptoms himself.

Sir Keir Starmer takes part in an LBC Radio show
Image: The Labour leader took part in an LBC Radio show earlier on Monday

A spokesperson for the Labour leader said: "This morning Keir Starmer was advised to self-isolate after a member of his household showed possible symptoms of the coronavirus.

"The member of his household has now had a test.

"In line with NHS guidelines, Keir will self-isolate while awaiting the results of the test and further advice from medical professionals."

Earlier on Monday morning, Sir Keir took part in a phone-in show on LBC Radio and appeared in the station's studio alongside host Nick Ferrari.

More from Covid-19

The Labour leader is understood to have been alerted to his need to self-isolate shortly after.

Sir Keir's office has contacted LBC to inform them.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMijQFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9jb3JvbmF2aXJ1cy1sYWJvdXItbGVhZGVyLXNpci1rZWlyLXN0YXJtZXItc2VsZi1pc29sYXRpbmctYWZ0ZXItaG91c2Vob2xkLW1lbWJlci1zaG93ZWQtY292aWQtMTktc3ltcHRvbXMtMTIwNzE2OTDSAZEBaHR0cHM6Ly9uZXdzLnNreS5jb20vc3RvcnkvYW1wL2Nvcm9uYXZpcnVzLWxhYm91ci1sZWFkZXItc2lyLWtlaXItc3Rhcm1lci1zZWxmLWlzb2xhdGluZy1hZnRlci1ob3VzZWhvbGQtbWVtYmVyLXNob3dlZC1jb3ZpZC0xOS1zeW1wdG9tcy0xMjA3MTY5MA?oc=5

2020-09-14 10:58:19Z
52781060750589

Fifth ex-PM speaks out against post-Brexit bill - BBC News

Media playback is unsupported on your device

David Cameron has become the fifth former prime minister to criticise a new bill attempting to override the Brexit withdrawal agreement.

The Internal Market Bill will come before MPs later, with the government calling it an "insurance policy".

Mr Cameron said he had "misgivings" over it and breaking an international treaty should be the "final resort".

Former Tory PMs Theresa May and Sir John Major, and Labour's Tony Blair and Gordon Brown have condemned the plan.

Earlier, Policing Minister Kit Malthouse called it a "practical" step.

He echoed comments made by Justice Secretary Robert Buckland on Sunday, who said the bill was there just in case the UK and EU do not agree a post-Brexit trade deal.

Boris Johnson was expected to speak to reporters at an event later, but No 10 confirmed it had been cancelled due to urgent parliamentary business.

The government is expected to win a vote in the Commons later on the next stage of the bill - which should take place around 22:00 BST (21:00 GMT) - but it is also expected to face more difficulties in later stages, especially when the legislation heads for debate in the Lords.

Former Attorney General Geoffrey Cox has said he will vote against it, accusing Mr Johnson of doing "unconscionable" damage to Britain's international reputation.

A senior government source told the BBC "all options are on the table" in terms of possible action against Tory MPs who do not support the bill.

The PM's special envoy for Freedom of Religion or Belief, Tory MP Rehman Chishti, has resigned over the proposed law, saying: "I have always acted in a manner which respects the rule of law... [and] voting for this bill as it currently stands would be contrary to the values I hold dearest."

Labour's shadow business secretary, Ed Miliband, also called the proposed law "legislative hooliganism".

The UK left the EU on 31 January, having negotiated and signed the withdrawal agreement with the bloc.

The two sides are now in the closing weeks of negotiations for a post-Brexit trade deal before the transition period ends on 31 December - with informal talks taking place in Brussels this week.

A key part of the withdrawal agreement - which is now an international treaty - was the Northern Ireland Protocol, designed to prevent a hard border returning to the island of Ireland.

The Internal Market Bill proposed by the government would override that part of that agreement when it came to goods and would allow the UK to modify or re-interpret "state aid" rules on subsidies for firms in Northern Ireland, in the event of the two sides not agreeing a future trade deal.

Last week, Northern Ireland Secretary Brandon Lewis said the bill would "break international law" in a "specific and limited way", leading to swathes of criticism from all sides of the political spectrum.

Here we go again... a Brexit deadline looms, there's a whole lot of noise about it in Westminster, and the UK and the EU can't agree.

And yes, yet again, there is a swirling soup of jargon every other sentence.

Take a few steps back though, and here is what this all amounts to - how the UK will trade with its nearest neighbours from January next year onwards and how the different parts of the UK will trade with each other.

This matters economically - and matters politically too.

The Brexit process has long exposed the tensions between the UK and Brussels, but don't underestimate the tensions it places on the UK as well.

Those in Scotland, Northern Ireland and Wales who have long argued to be unshackled from London, as they see it, argue Brexit is the ultimate case study to illustrate their argument.

And so the government at Westminster's delicate task is to extricate the UK from one union, the EU, while holding together another one, the UK.

All of these rows have that central aim at their core.

Mr Cameron - who called the EU referendum when he was PM - said he had "misgivings about what is being proposed".

Speaking to reporters, he said: "Passing an act of Parliament and then going on to break an international treaty obligation is the very, very last thing you should contemplate. It should be the absolute final resort."

Mr Cameron said the "bigger picture" was about trying to get a trade deal with the EU, urging the government to "keep that context [and] that big prize in mind."

The comments follow stronger criticism by the four other surviving former prime ministers of the UK.

Mrs May, who still sits as an MP in the Commons, said breaking international law would damage "trust" in the UK, while Mr Brown said it would be akin to "self-harm" for the country.

Sir John and Mr Blair - who were both in office during key periods of the Northern Ireland peace process - wrote a joint article in the Sunday Times accusing Mr Johnson of "embarrassing" the UK and urging MPs to reject the "shameful" attempt to override parts of the withdrawal agreement.

'Problem to solve'

Mr Malthouse defended the bill, saying it "solves the problem that we're faced with" over the future of trade with the EU.

He told BBC Breakfast: "What we've done is to say transparently that this is a situation which we think may occur - certainly that's what's being intimated from the EU. It's a problem we have to solve so here's a bill that solves it.

"In the end those people that oppose this bill have to tell us what the resolution is."

On Sunday, Justice Secretary Mr Buckland told the BBC he hoped powers being sought by ministers would never be needed, and that he would resign if the UK ended up breaking international law "in a way I find unacceptable".

But Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer accused government ministers of handing out "misinformation" over the weekend and "spinning" the reasons they were pursuing the new bill.

He told LBC: "[Mr Johnson] is making a mistake reneging on a treaty - that will have reputational damage for the UK.

"I would say to the prime minister, look go away, go back to the drawing board, drop these problems, don't act in this reckless and wrong way and we'll look again at the legislation."

Media playback is unsupported on your device

The bill has split opinion on the Tory backbenches.

MP Sir Desmond Swayne said he would be supporting the bill, praising the government for preparing in case no trade deal is agreed by the end of the year.

He told BBC News: "If the government didn't take precautions against that possibility, it would be utterly negligent. It is right it arm itself with the powers just in case."

But his colleague, and chair of the Justice Select Committee, Sir Bob Neill, said the government and its supporters needed to "calm the language".

He said there was already a mechanism for addressing the government's concerns, but he was willing to "meet them half-way" with an amendment to the bill - only allowing the elements that would break international law to be used if Parliament signs it off.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiL2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTU0MTQ1MjAy0gEzaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvYW1wL3VrLXBvbGl0aWNzLTU0MTQ1MjAy?oc=5

2020-09-14 09:56:15Z
52781062222382