Kamis, 10 September 2020

Brexit: Boris Johnson facing Tory revolt over plans to override Withdrawal Agreement - Sky News

Boris Johnson is facing a potential parliamentary rebellion after angering both Conservative Remainers and Brexiteers by vowing to push ahead with plans to override key elements of the Brexit withdrawal deal.

Despite a demand by the EU to drop proposed legislation - and an accompanying threat of legal action from Brussels if the UK does not back down - the prime minister is ploughing ahead with the move to alter key elements of the UK's Withdrawal Agreement.

Mr Johnson, himself, struck the agreement last year before formally signing the deal in January. But he is now seeking, through the UK Internal Market Bill, to empower ministers to set it aside.

Michael Gove MP
UK will not scrap controversial bill - Gove

The government - which has admitted the bill would break international law if passed - has argued the legislation is "critical" to ensuring the unfettered access for goods from Northern Ireland to the rest of the UK, and to protect the Good Friday Agreement.

But, as well as the fury from European capitals, Mr Johnson has also angered those within his own party ahead of the bill being voted on in the House of Commons.

Unhappy Tory MPs have tabled an amendment to the legislation that would try to block the government from overriding the Withdrawal Agreement without parliament's support.

Sir Bob Neill, who has tabled the amendment with the backing of fellow Tory former ministers Damian Green and Oliver Heald, told Times Radio: "I hope it's at least an indication as a government that really, you need to think very hard and carefully about going down this route.

More from Boris Johnson

"For heaven's sake, try and find some other way."

Sir Bob played down the prospect of Tory rebels, who are reported to number up to 30, losing the Tory whip by voting against the government's proposed legislation.

But he signalled he would be ready to be thrown out the Conservative parliamentary party if necessary.

Tory MP Roger Gale
Tory MP will vote against UK Internal Market Bill

Sir Roger Gale also indicated he is ready to lose the Conservative whip in order to vote against the bill.

"I shall do what I have to do on the basis of principle," he told Sky News.

"And the principle is that this United Kingdom keeps its word internationally."

Last year, Mr Johnson expelled 21 Conservative MPs from the parliamentary party for voting against his Brexit plans.

But it was not just among those Tories who campaigned to Remain in the EU that concerns were being raised about the Internal Market Bill.

Sir Bernard Jenkin, the leader of the European Research Group of Tory eurosceptics, told LBC Radio: "The prime minister should be more mindful of the reputational damage of playing such hardball when there's really no consensus from the country to go about breaking international agreements."

Mr Johnson, who enjoys an 80-strong Commons majority, could also face Tory opposition to his plans in the House of Lords after two senior Conservative peers expressed their displeasure at the prime minister's actions.

:: Subscribe to the All Out Politics podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker

Lord Howard of Lympne became the third former Conservative leader - after Sir John Major and Theresa May - to criticise the government's plans.

The Brexit-backing peer accused the government of damaging the UK's "reputation for probity and respect for the rule of the law".

He told the House of Lords: "How can we reproach Russia or China or Iran when their conduct falls below internationally accepted standards, when we are showing such scant regard for our treaty obligations?"

His fellow Brexiteer Lord Lamont, a former chancellor, warned the legislation would not get through the House of Lords unless there were changes.

"The government are in a terrible mess and in a hole and I don't think it is easy to justify," he told BBC Radio 4's PM programme.

"In a way, this could take us back to square one with a terrible dilemma."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMid2h0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2JyZXhpdC1ib3Jpcy1qb2huc29uLWZhY2luZy10b3J5LXJldm9sdC1vdmVyLXBsYW5zLXRvLW92ZXJyaWRlLXdpdGhkcmF3YWwtYWdyZWVtZW50LTEyMDY4NTQx0gF7aHR0cHM6Ly9uZXdzLnNreS5jb20vc3RvcnkvYW1wL2JyZXhpdC1ib3Jpcy1qb2huc29uLWZhY2luZy10b3J5LXJldm9sdC1vdmVyLXBsYW5zLXRvLW92ZXJyaWRlLXdpdGhkcmF3YWwtYWdyZWVtZW50LTEyMDY4NTQx?oc=5

2020-09-11 02:21:24Z
52781052316363

Harry Dunn death: Anne Sacoolas lawyers say she 'drove on wrong side of road' - BBC News

Harry Dunn
image copyrightJustice4Harry19

Harry Dunn's alleged killer Anne Sacoolas drove on the "wrong side of the road for 20 seconds" before the fatal crash, her lawyers said.

But she was "otherwise driving cautiously and below the speed limit", her legal representatives added.

They have issued a statement detailing the 43-year-old's side of the story.

The American was charged with causing death by dangerous driving after a crash in August 2019 which resulted in 19-year-old Mr Dunn's death.

Ms Sacoolas claimed diplomatic immunity following the collision outside RAF Croughton in Northamptonshire.

She was able to return to her home country, sparking controversy.

Anne Sacoolas
image copyrightAiken Standard Archive

According to her lawyers, Ms Sacoolas "instinctively" began driving on the right-hand side, and could not see Mr Dunn due to "the crest of a small hill".

In a public statement, they said: "Anne did everything she could to assist Harry. After the accident, she ran from her car and tried to help him.

"Anne then saw another motorist approach and flagged her down for more support.

"The other motorist immediately called for the emergency services and Anne made calls to alert the police from the nearby air force base.

"The base police arrived quickly and assisted Harry.

"Tragically, it took over 40 minutes for the ambulance to arrive and nearly two hours passed before Harry was admitted to the hospital.

"Anne did not leave the scene until she was instructed to do so by the UK authorities."

Sacoolas's legal representatives also made an on-the-record statement regarding her position on the prospect of a virtual trial.

They said: "We have been and remain willing to discuss a resolution, including the possibility of virtual proceedings, with the UK authorities.

'The right thing'

Reacting to the suspect's statement and speaking on behalf of Mr Dunn's family, their spokesman Radd Seiger said: "The parents have noted the statement issued this evening on behalf of Mrs Sacoolas.

"Their position is that these issues should not be aired in any form other than a court of law.

"Once again, they invite her to do the right thing and return to the UK to answer to the charges laid against her."

Mr Dunn's alleged killer returned to the US on a commercial flight after the US Embassy "informed the Foreign Office of this decision and instructed Anne to return home".

Ms Sacoolas was charged in December but an extradition request submitted by the Home Office was refused in January.

The US State Department have since said the decision to reject the request was "final".

More on this story

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiP2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLWVuZ2xhbmQtbm9ydGhhbXB0b25zaGlyZS01NDExMjg0MdIBQ2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL2FtcC91ay1lbmdsYW5kLW5vcnRoYW1wdG9uc2hpcmUtNTQxMTI4NDE?oc=5

2020-09-10 23:13:00Z
52781053317729

Professor KAROL SIKORA sees trouble ahead for Boris Johnson's new coronavirus guidance - Daily Mail

This ridiculous rule of 6 poses a real danger - Britain losing its faith in its leaders: KAROL SIKORA says the government has been successful at spreading fear, and not much else

KAROL SIKORA: It is illogical and merely invites ridicule and disobedience from an increasingly sceptical and weary public

KAROL SIKORA: It is illogical and merely invites ridicule and disobedience from an increasingly sceptical and weary public

Expert advisers have deep and very specific areas of knowledge, but can only offer a selective view of the facts – in this case a recent and modest rise in coronavirus infections in young people – to ministers.

The ultimate decision, based on a balanced assessment of the competing opinions, has to be a political one that convinces the public.

And I am afraid that the ‘Hands, Face, Space’ slogan, crowned with the Rule of Six – a ban on gatherings of more than six people indoors or outdoors – fails miserably on that count.

Of course it is much safer for 20 people to meet, socially distanced, in a park than have six people gathered in a crowded living room – but the new restriction makes no provision for this.

It is illogical and merely invites ridicule and disobedience from an increasingly sceptical and weary public who are confused and disillusioned by repeated stop-start initiatives, be it testing or quarantine or a return to the workplace, over the past six months.

And certainly the latest gimmicks do nothing to address the fear factor that holds so many in its grip.

Yet what an opportunity Boris Johnson had to change the mood of the nation on Wednesday night as he addressed us from the Downing Street lectern.

First, he might have saluted school teachers for coming together to end the social isolation of millions of children and kick-start their education again.

What an opportunity Boris Johnson had to change the mood of the nation on Wednesday night as he addressed us from the Downing Street lectern

This is a crucial step forward in safe-guarding the mental health of children whose short lives have been upended in 2020.

Next he should have urged university and college students to start the new term with optimism.

Then he should have acknowledged that uptick in infections (as you’d expect when people start to mingle again) in the healthy young who are largely invulnerable to coronavirus, while emphasising another critical statistic: last week ten times as many people died in England of flu and pneumonia as of Covid.

Fourthly – and I speak as a cancer specialist – I would have rejoiced to hear the Prime Minister acknowledge the tens of thousands of people out there who, because of the impact of Covid-19 on routine NHS screening programmes and the restrictions under which many GP surgeries are operating, are failing to seek diagnosis or treatment for worrying symptoms.

For be in no doubt, these are the next wave of Covid-19’s collateral damage.

I wish Mr Johnson had told the nation to cajole or bully our loved ones to demand to be seen by their GP, via Zoom if necessary – because that really will save lives.

I doubt that the Rule of Six will make any material difference to the reinfection rate, but one thing is absolutely certain. Thousands more people will die in the coming months and years because of undiagnosed cancers, cardiac disorders and other treatable conditions than will succumb directly to Covid-19.

And the lack of urgency – acknowledgement – surrounding this growing crisis makes me truly despair.

The rationale of the initial lockdown was to ‘Protect the NHS’. Well, the NHS coped fine, essentially by shutting itself down to all but Covid admissions, A&E, and maternity care.

But we ignored the human health cost of this, and it will be very high indeed.

Basic modelling predicts at least 30,000 extra cancer deaths as a result of the hobbling of the UK’s diagnostic services. Take prostate cancer: as the Mail reported this week, referrals have halved since lockdown began.

As for routine bread and butter operations, it will take years for the NHS to recover, if ever. Waiting times for knee and hip replacements are the longest in 12 years, with 2.15million patients on the lists.

People eating at tables placed outside on Old Compton St in Soho, London, August 31

People eating at tables placed outside on Old Compton St in Soho, London, August 31

The trends are even more terrifying in cardiac care. Figures suggest a nearly 50 per cent drop in the number of heart attacks in the UK in the first three months of the shutdown.

This would be a jaw-dropping figure if it were true, but unfortunately it is not. What it really means is that thousands of people who suffered symptoms of a heart attack at the milder end of the spectrum were too scared to go to hospital for treatment.

If you are not treated for a mild heart attack, you might convince yourself you’ve recovered, but your heart muscles will have been weakened. You are much more likely to suffer gradual heart failure and sudden death in the next couple of years.

Psychologically, the fundamental problem with the Rule of Six is that it reverses the tide towards the return to normality which, as a nation, we desperately have to cling to. Worst of all, it undermines any effort to get people back to work, particularly via public transport. Any sensible person will wonder how it can be safe to get on a busy bus or train if it is deemed dangerous to gather their extended family in their own home.

And as for the ‘moonshot’ mass population testing plan, well I wish I could get excited about it.

There is one obvious problem here. Even if it can be achieved, testing on this level will throw up hundreds of thousands of false positive results, which would require those people, plus all their contacts, to self-quarantine. This is impractical, and will not happen.

I worry that Boris and his ministers and advisers have squandered so much political capital with policy shifts, U-turns, meaningless slogans and gimmicks that the nation – and especially young people – are beginning to dismiss everything they hear.

People will even stop obeying the sensible rules, like handwashing, wearing a mask in public and keeping a distance. I am currently on holiday in North Wales and I noticed when I went out for curry last night that an implausible number of people had registered under the name of Smith in the restaurant’s test and trace book.

This open defiance, I suspect, will become the norm, and the plan to employ Covid Marshals to enforce restrictions will, I fear, bring the authorities into further ridicule.

This Government has been very successful in the business of spreading fear about Covid, but in not much else.

What people desperately need now is belief that things can, and will, get back to a state of being that they recognise. Above all, they crave that most human of emotion – a sense of hope.

Karol Sikora is professor of medicine at University of Buckingham Medical School and Chief Medical Officer at Rutherford Health.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiiQFodHRwczovL3d3dy5kYWlseW1haWwuY28udWsvZGViYXRlL2FydGljbGUtODcyMDMyMS9Qcm9mZXNzb3ItS0FST0wtU0lLT1JBLXNlZXMtdHJvdWJsZS1haGVhZC1Cb3Jpcy1Kb2huc29ucy1uZXctY29yb25hdmlydXMtZ3VpZGFuY2UuaHRtbNIBjQFodHRwczovL3d3dy5kYWlseW1haWwuY28udWsvZGViYXRlL2FydGljbGUtODcyMDMyMS9hbXAvUHJvZmVzc29yLUtBUk9MLVNJS09SQS1zZWVzLXRyb3VibGUtYWhlYWQtQm9yaXMtSm9obnNvbnMtbmV3LWNvcm9uYXZpcnVzLWd1aWRhbmNlLmh0bWw?oc=5

2020-09-10 21:34:37Z
52781051926856

Brexit: Conservative rebels could yet throw Boris Johnson off track - Sky News

It seems there is no amount of pressure from the European Union that would make Boris Johnson yield over his plans to annul the Withdrawal Agreement.

Via video link, representatives of every one of the EU's 27 countries joined a meeting of the Joint Committee implementing the Northern Ireland Protocol with Michael Gove and Maros Sefcovic, the European Commission's vice-president.

Mr Sefcovic protested. Mr Gove replied that the government would not back down.

Michael Gove MP
UK will not scrap controversial bill

The apoplexy expressed by Europe - and a good deal of other international politicians - was priced in by Downing Street when they did this move.

This is why it is unlikely to have much effect.

More dangerous for Number 10 is the pincer movement from the prime minister's own party, as we head towards votes on the legislation starting on Monday.

Even the revolt on behalf of Tory MPs who voted Remain is proving more tricky since it is led by Theresa May - Mr Johnson's predecessor.

More from Boris Johnson

Friends say she cannot support the legislation.

Conveniently, however, she is understood to be out of the country on a long-planned trip, meaning she will avoid the consequences of failing to back it, which have in the past included being thrown out of the Tory parliamentary party.

Many of the other rebels who once would have sided with Remainers have avoided protesting in public, just telling the chief whip they cannot support what's going on.

More striking, however, is the nature of the revolt amongst Brexiteers.

Lord Howard became the third former Conservative leader - but the first who voted for Brexit - to protest in the most vehement possible way over the plans to ride roughshod over international law.

He was swiftly followed by former Tory chancellor Lord Lamont, another Brexiteer, who said that the plan was impossible to support.

:: Subscribe to the All Out Politics podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker

Sir Bernard Jenkin, of the European Research Group, warned of the consequences of breaking international agreements.

Mr Johnson is at the centre of a pincer movement.

He has a robust 80-strong majority, and the DUP will vote for it. There have not been been any ministerial resignations to date over the issue.

Yet the status and volume of rebels could yet throw the government off track.

Fittingly, Brexit looks like it will be decided on the floor of the House of Commons after all.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiZmh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2JyZXhpdC1jb25zZXJ2YXRpdmUtcmViZWxzLWNvdWxkLXlldC10aHJvdy1ib3Jpcy1qb2huc29uLW9mZi10cmFjay0xMjA2ODQ5MtIBamh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2FtcC9icmV4aXQtY29uc2VydmF0aXZlLXJlYmVscy1jb3VsZC15ZXQtdGhyb3ctYm9yaXMtam9obnNvbi1vZmYtdHJhY2stMTIwNjg0OTI?oc=5

2020-09-10 20:58:22Z
52781052316363

Churchill statue vandalised again as topless climate protesters chain themselves to railings - Sky News

Winston Churchill's statue in Parliament Square has been vandalised with graffiti again.

The words "is a racist" were sprayed on the plinth beneath the statue of the wartime prime minister.

It comes only three months after it was vandalised with similar words during Black Lives Matter protests - forcing it to be boarded up for its own protection.

Winston Churchill statue
Image: The statue was boarded up for a time in June

London's Metropolitan Police said a man had been arrested on suspicion of causing criminal damage on Thursday evening.

Today's graffiti was sprayed amid protests by Extinction Rebellion activists in the capital.

Police made arrests after at least 13 topless women put bike locks round their necks and chained themselves to railings near parliament to highlight the "bare truth" of climate change.

The women locked themselves to the gates with D-locks
Image: The women locked themselves to railings with cycle D-locks

Words including drought, starvation and wildfires were written on their chests and they wore masks with 4C written on them - referencing the temperature increase that many scientists believe will have dire consequences for the planet.

More from Winston Churchill

Sarah Mintram, a teacher who took part in the action, said: "Now we've got your attention. By neglecting to communicate the consequences of a 4C world - war, famine, drought, displacement - the government are failing to protect us."

Officers removed the women and put them into police vans
Image: Officers removed the women and put them into police vans

Police removed the D-locks from the protesters' necks and took them away in four vans as their supporters cheered.

The Met said 648 people had so far been arrested during the climate protests in London this month.

Last week demonstrators delayed the delivery of millions of newspapers when they blocked printworks in Hertfordshire and Merseyside.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMigAFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9jaHVyY2hpbGwtc3RhdHVlLXZhbmRhbGlzZWQtYWdhaW4tYXMtdG9wbGVzcy1jbGltYXRlLXByb3Rlc3RlcnMtY2hhaW4tdGhlbXNlbHZlcy10by1yYWlsaW5ncy0xMjA2ODQzONIBhAFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9hbXAvY2h1cmNoaWxsLXN0YXR1ZS12YW5kYWxpc2VkLWFnYWluLWFzLXRvcGxlc3MtY2xpbWF0ZS1wcm90ZXN0ZXJzLWNoYWluLXRoZW1zZWx2ZXMtdG8tcmFpbGluZ3MtMTIwNjg0Mzg?oc=5

2020-09-10 19:32:02Z
52781052461725

UK will not withdraw legislation despite EU warnings, Gove says - Guardian News

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

  1. UK will not withdraw legislation despite EU warnings, Gove says  Guardian News
  2. Brexit: EU ultimatum to UK over withdrawal deal changes  BBC News
  3. Northern Ireland protocol meaning: What is the NI protocol? Why is it important?  Daily Express
  4. Boris Johnson's 'oven-ready' Brexit had a secret footnote: we'll rehash it later  The Guardian
  5. Britain’s dangerous Brexit brinkmanship  Financial Times
  6. View Full coverage on Google News

https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiK2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnlvdXR1YmUuY29tL3dhdGNoP3Y9cWNtaW1sRkRhQWvSAQA?oc=5

2020-09-10 19:08:32Z
52781052316363

Boris Johnson’s government is right to protect integrity of UK - Financial Times

The writer, a former Conservative cabinet member, is MP for Chingford and Woodford Green

The UK has reached a critical moment in securing its post-Brexit future. This week, Boris Johnson’s government introduced important legislation, the internal market bill, to ensure the maintenance of a free market in goods and services within the four nations of the UK after leaving the EU.

There has been notable concern about the bill’s proposals to restrict the “direct effect” of three parts of our withdrawal agreement with the EU with respect to Northern Ireland. Among other things, the bill would prevent the imposition of EU tariffs on all goods sent from Great Britain to Northern Ireland.

I believe the government is right to do it and the outcry is overwrought.

What critics seem to have forgotten is that the Brexit agreement makes clear that Northern Ireland is part of the UK’s customs territory. Goods should be allowed to flow between Great Britain and Northern Ireland without tariffs unless they are deemed “at risk”. The problem is that the “at risk” category is not defined. 

This gives the EU too much discretion because it could in theory define all UK products as “at risk” if it wishes and levy tariffs on all goods as they cross the Irish Sea. Such a possibility is contrary to the Act of Union that underpins Northern Ireland’s status within the UK and abolishes all customs duties between the constituent parts of the UK.

Introducing customs duties between Great Britain and Northern Ireland would alter the constitutional status of Northern Ireland within the UK. In doing so, it would obviously breach the 1998 Good Friday Agreement that brought peace to Northern Ireland. That settlement states that Northern Ireland’s status cannot be changed without the consent of its people.

Surely, if the EU didn’t intend this — and it has stated constantly that they wish to preserve the peace accord — then it has no reason to object to a UK law that blocks such a prospect.

If, as a cynic might assume, the withdrawal agreement was actually intended to be used to bully the UK, or give advantages to EU goods producers, then it makes it all the more important for the UK to pass a bill to block this blatant attack on our constitutional settlement. 

I am also intrigued by some of the protests about the inviolability of international law — including objections from the EU itself. After all, the EU has also breached international law when it suits. The EU has disregarded a number of adverse rulings by World Trade Organization, including those that involve subsidies to Airbus and an EU/US steel and aluminium dispute

Furthermore, the European Court of Justice has in another case, Portugal vs Council, rejected the application of direct effect to the WTO agreements in EU law, in essence finding against treaty obligations and in favour of the EU domestic law. The EU is being just a bit hypocritical.

The Brexit withdrawal agreement is clear. The parties must negotiate on the future relationship “in good faith and in full respect of their respective legal orders”. I believe the bloc is already in breach of that when it threatens legal action to enforce terms that could jeopardise the UK’s constitutional settlement.

Furthermore, there is an international law principle that treaty powers should be exercised in good faith. I believe the EU’s insistence that it needs the power to impose full tariffs on goods crossing the Irish Sea represents a further example of bad faith.

The UK’s internal market bill should not surprise the EU. After all, the bloc knew full well that Mr Johnson intended to protect the internal UK market. The EU surely must understand the act implementing the withdrawal agreement it signed has a clause saying “nothing in this act derogates from the sovereignty of the Parliament of the United Kingdom”. They will have known this gives the Westminster parliament the power to pass such legislation. 

Of course the Johnson government has the right to ensure our constitutional settlement and sovereignty are protected. It is right to secure trade within the UK and ensure we are ready for the day when Brexit is finally complete later this year.

There would be no point in the UK voting to leave the EU and regain its sovereignty, only to find it stolen away by the back door in Ireland by the EU. No other country worth anything would accept subjecting itself to obeying laws and regulations over which it has no control. Neither should the UK, with its proud history of standing for freedom.

Sovereignty is what British people voted for, not subordination.

 

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiP2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZ0LmNvbS9jb250ZW50LzhjMGEzYmMzLWY4MjMtNDgzNS04ZGQwLTVlMGQzZjk2ZmUyMdIBP2h0dHBzOi8vYW1wLmZ0LmNvbS9jb250ZW50LzhjMGEzYmMzLWY4MjMtNDgzNS04ZGQwLTVlMGQzZjk2ZmUyMQ?oc=5

2020-09-10 18:50:00Z
52781052316363