Jumat, 05 Juni 2020

Boris Johnson offers to accept EU tariffs to win trade deal to break deadlock with Brussels - Daily Mail

Boris Johnson offers to accept EU tariffs as part of Brexit trade deal in attempt to break deadlock in talks with Brussels

  • The UK's chief negotiator David Frost has offered to accept tariffs on goods
  • Michel Barnier hinted bloc will drop demand for UK to follow EU state aid regime
  • Officials have not confirmed which sectors will be allowed to have EU tariffs 

Boris Johnson is ready to accept EU tariffs on some British goods in a bid to break the deadlock in EU trade talks.

The latest round broke up yesterday with both sides saying there had been no significant progress.

But UK sources said the Prime Minister’s chief negotiator David Frost had made a significant new offer.

Under the plan, the UK would accept tariffs on a small number of goods in return for Brussels dropping its demand that Britain continue to follow EU rules.

Boris Johnson is ready to accept EU tariffs on some British goods in a bid to break the deadlock with Brussels in EU trade talks. Pictured: Speaking at the Global Vaccine Summit (GAVI) via Zoom from the White Room of 10 Downing Street in London on Thursday

Boris Johnson is ready to accept EU tariffs on some British goods in a bid to break the deadlock with Brussels in EU trade talks. Pictured: Speaking at the Global Vaccine Summit (GAVI) via Zoom from the White Room of 10 Downing Street in London on Thursday

Officials declined to say which sectors would be involved but pointed out that trade deals often involved tariffs on ‘sensitive agricultural goods’.

Any move to accept tariffs or quotas would be a significant concession for Mr Johnson, who has spoken repeatedly of his ambition to achieve a ‘zero tariff, zero quota’ deal.

The imposition of tariffs on agricultural produce would also hit British farmers and be unpopular with many Tory MPs.

Agricultural tariffs can be high. EU tariffs on lamb, for example, start at 13 per cent and can rise to more than 40 per cent, depending on the cut of meat.

British farmers will be hit by these tariffs if there is no trade deal by the end of the year and had hoped to avoid them through an agreement being struck.

The Prime Minister¿s chief negotiator David Frost (left) had made a significant new offer to accept tariffs on a small number of goods in return for Brussels dropping its demand that Britain continue to follow EU rules. Pictured: With European Union chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier (right) at the start of the first round of post-Brexit trade deal talks between the EU and the United Kingdom on March 2

The Prime Minister’s chief negotiator David Frost (left) had made a significant new offer to accept tariffs on a small number of goods in return for Brussels dropping its demand that Britain continue to follow EU rules. Pictured: With European Union chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier (right) at the start of the first round of post-Brexit trade deal talks between the EU and the United Kingdom on March 2

In a further sign of Mr Johnson’s eagerness to strike a deal, sources said an earlier threat to walk away from the talks this month if no progress had been made has been relaxed in the light of the disruption caused by the pandemic.

Mr Johnson’s decision to allow talks to go beyond June despite there being no deal in sight will be seen as a sign of his desire to get an agreement that avoids further economic problems at the end of this year.

Despite the tough language, there were also signs of movement on the EU side.

Mr Barnier hinted at a possible compromise over the EU’s demand that the UK continue to follow its state aid regime, which has previously been a red line for the bloc.

Mr Frost is seeking to intensify negotiations in the coming weeks, including holding the first face-to-face talks since coronavirus struck.

The Prime Minister will try to inject political momentum into the stalled process this month by holding direct discussions with European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen.

The talks have been disrupted by the pandemic, with two sides forced to conduct negotiations by video link.

Mr Frost yesterday said they were ‘close to reaching the limits of what can be achieved’ remotely. He said there was now a need to ‘intensify and accelerate our work’.

A source declined to put a new deadline on the talks, but added: ‘We are not up for a long negotiation over the next months well into the autumn where nobody knows what is going to happen.

‘October is too late for us to conclude this.’

European Union chief Brexit negotiatorMr Barnier hinted at a possible compromise over the EU¿s demand that the UK continue to follow its state aid regime, which has previously been a red line for the bloc

European Union chief Brexit negotiatorMr Barnier hinted at a possible compromise over the EU’s demand that the UK continue to follow its state aid regime, which has previously been a red line for the bloc

The talks are deadlocked over the issues of fishing rights and the EU’s demand for a ‘level playing field’. Mr Barnier accused the UK of failing to show ‘any true will’ to negotiate on fishing.

But British sources said that Brussels had to recognise that the UK would take full control of its waters from the end of this year and would then decide who fishes there.

The UK has rejected the EU’s demand for a detailed ‘level playing field’, arguing it goes far beyond the scope of a normal free trade agreement and would tie Britain into following the bloc’s laws indefinitely.

The idea to impose tariffs was not immediately welcomed by Brussels. ‘We floated that,’ the official said. ‘It fell slightly on stony ground at the moment but it is still in there in the discussions.

‘Obviously we would rather not go there but if it is what helps make progress, then we are willing to talk about that.

‘We will have to see if we get into those discussions and then see where it settles. We are not at that point yet.’

Mr Barnier yesterday acknowledged the negotiations needed ‘extra political momentum’ as the two sides remained ‘very far’ from agreement in key areas.

He said the ‘door is still open’ for the UK to extend the transition period beyond the end of this year, but this has been ruled out by No 10.

And he warned that failure to reach a deal would result in the imposition of a ‘hard border’ on the island of Ireland, which both sides have pledged to avoid. 

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMigwFodHRwczovL3d3dy5kYWlseW1haWwuY28udWsvbmV3cy9hcnRpY2xlLTgzOTMzMjMvQm9yaXMtSm9obnNvbi1vZmZlcnMtYWNjZXB0LUVVLXRhcmlmZnMtd2luLXRyYWRlLWRlYWwtYnJlYWstZGVhZGxvY2stQnJ1c3NlbHMuaHRtbNIBhwFodHRwczovL3d3dy5kYWlseW1haWwuY28udWsvbmV3cy9hcnRpY2xlLTgzOTMzMjMvYW1wL0JvcmlzLUpvaG5zb24tb2ZmZXJzLWFjY2VwdC1FVS10YXJpZmZzLXdpbi10cmFkZS1kZWFsLWJyZWFrLWRlYWRsb2NrLUJydXNzZWxzLmh0bWw?oc=5

2020-06-06 02:48:30Z
52780832811978

Coronavirus: WHO advises to wear masks in public areas - BBC News

The World Health Organization (WHO) has changed its advice on face masks, saying they should be worn in public to help stop the spread of coronavirus.

The global body said new information showed they could provide "a barrier for potentially infectious droplets".

Some countries around the world already recommend or mandate the wearing of face coverings in public.

The WHO had previously argued there was not enough evidence to say that healthy people should wear masks.

Dr Maria Van Kerkhove, the WHO's technical lead expert on Covid-19, told Reuters news agency the recommendation was for people to wear a "fabric mask - that is, a non-medical mask".

The organisation had always advised that medical face masks should be worn by people who are sick and those caring for them.

Globally, there have been 6.7 million confirmed coronavirus cases and nearly 400,000 deaths since the outbreak began late last year, according to data compiled by Johns Hopkins University.

What is the WHO's advice?

The organisation said its new guidance had been prompted by studies over recent weeks. "We are advising governments to encourage that the general public wear a mask," Dr Van Kerkhove said.

At the same time, the WHO stressed that face masks were just one of a range of tools that could be used to reduce the risk of transmission - and that they should not give people a false sense of protection.

"Masks on their own will not protect you from Covid-19," said WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

Big shift in guidance

This is a big shift in the WHO's guidance on when the public should cover their faces. For months, the organisation's experts stuck to the line that masks would encourage a false sense of security and would deprive medical professionals of badly needed protective equipment.

Those arguments have not gone away but at the same time the WHO acknowledges that new evidence has emerged on the risks of transmission.

It points to recent research that people can be highly infectious in the few days before they show symptoms and that some people catch the virus but never show symptoms at all, as I reported last weekend.

So where distancing is not possible, such as on public transport and in locations as varied as shops and refugee camps, it is suggested that faces are covered with homemade masks to avoid passing on the infection.

Over 60s with underlying health conditions should go further, the WHO said, and wear medical-grade masks to give themselves better protection.

What are the latest key developments globally?

In the UK, the government announced on Friday that hospital visitors and out-patients would be required to wear face coverings, and that hospital staff would have to wear medical masks, even if they were not in a clinical setting.

The guidance will come into force on 15 June, as more businesses open up and more pupils return to school. Also on Friday the UK became the second country to record more than 40,000 coronavirus-related deaths, after the US.

Media playback is unsupported on your device

In other developments around the world:

  • With more than 34,000 deaths, Brazil overtook Italy to become the country with the third-highest death toll worldwide
  • The EU commissioner for home affairs said member states should reopen their internal borders by end of June
  • Portugal will start reopening its beaches later on Saturday
  • Meanwhile in Poland, gyms, swimming pools and amusement parks will be reopened

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiKmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL2hlYWx0aC01Mjk0NTIxMNIBLmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL2FtcC9oZWFsdGgtNTI5NDUyMTA?oc=5

2020-06-06 01:53:38Z
52780825733813

Coronavirus: WHO advises to wear masks in public areas - BBC News

The World Health Organization (WHO) has changed its advice on face masks, saying they should be worn in public to help stop the spread of coronavirus.

The global body said new information showed they could provide "a barrier for potentially infectious droplets".

Some countries around the world already recommend or mandate the wearing of face coverings in public.

The WHO had previously argued there was not enough evidence to say that healthy people should wear masks.

Dr Maria Van Kerkhove, the WHO's technical lead expert on Covid-19, told Reuters news agency the recommendation was for people to wear a "fabric mask - that is, a non-medical mask".

The organisation had always advised that medical face masks should be worn by people who are sick and those caring for them.

Globally, there have been 6.7 million confirmed coronavirus cases and nearly 400,000 deaths since the outbreak began late last year, according to data compiled by Johns Hopkins University.

What is the WHO's advice?

The organisation said its new guidance had been prompted by studies over recent weeks. "We are advising governments to encourage that the general public wear a mask," Dr Van Kerkhove said.

At the same time, the WHO stressed that face masks were just one of a range of tools that could be used to reduce the risk of transmission - and that they should not give people a false sense of protection.

"Masks on their own will not protect you from Covid-19," said WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

Big shift in guidance

This is a big shift in the WHO's guidance on when the public should cover their faces. For months, the organisation's experts stuck to the line that masks would encourage a false sense of security and would deprive medical professionals of badly needed protective equipment.

Those arguments have not gone away but at the same time the WHO acknowledges that new evidence has emerged on the risks of transmission.

It points to recent research that people can be highly infectious in the few days before they show symptoms and that some people catch the virus but never show symptoms at all, as I reported last weekend.

So where distancing is not possible, such as on public transport and in locations as varied as shops and refugee camps, it is suggested that faces are covered with homemade masks to avoid passing on the infection.

Over 60s with underlying health conditions should go further, the WHO said, and wear medical-grade masks to give themselves better protection.

What are the latest key developments globally?

In the UK, the government announced on Friday that hospital visitors and out-patients would be required to wear face coverings, and that hospital staff would have to wear medical masks, even if they were not in a clinical setting.

The guidance will come into force on 15 June, as more businesses open up and more pupils return to school. Also on Friday the UK became the second country to record more than 40,000 coronavirus-related deaths, after the US.

Media playback is unsupported on your device

In other developments around the world:

  • With more than 34,000 deaths, Brazil overtook Italy to become the country with the third-highest death toll worldwide
  • The EU commissioner for home affairs said member states should reopen their internal borders by end of June
  • Portugal will start reopening its beaches later on Saturday
  • Meanwhile in Poland, gyms, swimming pools and amusement parks will be reopened

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiKmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL2hlYWx0aC01Mjk0NTIxMNIBLmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL2FtcC9oZWFsdGgtNTI5NDUyMTA?oc=5

2020-06-06 01:24:44Z
52780825733813

Boris Johnson offers to accept EU tariffs to win trade deal to break deadlock with Brussels - Daily Mail

Boris Johnson offers to accept EU tariffs to win trade deal in Brexit talks in attempt to break deadlock with Brussels

  • The UK's chief negotiator David Frost has offered to accept tariffs on goods
  • Michel Barnier hinted bloc will drop demand for UK to follow EU state aid regime
  • Officials have not confirmed which sectors will be allowed to have EU tariffs 

Boris Johnson is ready to accept EU tariffs on some British goods in a bid to break the deadlock in EU trade talks.

The latest round broke up yesterday with both sides saying there had been no significant progress.

But UK sources said the Prime Minister’s chief negotiator David Frost had made a significant new offer.

Under the plan, the UK would accept tariffs on a small number of goods in return for Brussels dropping its demand that Britain continue to follow EU rules.

Boris Johnson is ready to accept EU tariffs on some British goods in a bid to break the deadlock with Brussels in EU trade talks. Pictured: Speaking at the Global Vaccine Summit (GAVI) via Zoom from the White Room of 10 Downing Street in London on Thursday

Boris Johnson is ready to accept EU tariffs on some British goods in a bid to break the deadlock with Brussels in EU trade talks. Pictured: Speaking at the Global Vaccine Summit (GAVI) via Zoom from the White Room of 10 Downing Street in London on Thursday

Officials declined to say which sectors would be involved but pointed out that trade deals often involved tariffs on ‘sensitive agricultural goods’.

Any move to accept tariffs or quotas would be a significant concession for Mr Johnson, who has spoken repeatedly of his ambition to achieve a ‘zero tariff, zero quota’ deal.

The imposition of tariffs on agricultural produce would also hit British farmers and be unpopular with many Tory MPs.

Agricultural tariffs can be high. EU tariffs on lamb, for example, start at 13 per cent and can rise to more than 40 per cent, depending on the cut of meat.

British farmers will be hit by these tariffs if there is no trade deal by the end of the year and had hoped to avoid them through an agreement being struck.

The Prime Minister¿s chief negotiator David Frost (left) had made a significant new offer to accept tariffs on a small number of goods in return for Brussels dropping its demand that Britain continue to follow EU rules. Pictured: With European Union chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier (right) at the start of the first round of post-Brexit trade deal talks between the EU and the United Kingdom on March 2

The Prime Minister’s chief negotiator David Frost (left) had made a significant new offer to accept tariffs on a small number of goods in return for Brussels dropping its demand that Britain continue to follow EU rules. Pictured: With European Union chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier (right) at the start of the first round of post-Brexit trade deal talks between the EU and the United Kingdom on March 2

In a further sign of Mr Johnson’s eagerness to strike a deal, sources said an earlier threat to walk away from the talks this month if no progress had been made has been relaxed in the light of the disruption caused by the pandemic.

Mr Johnson’s decision to allow talks to go beyond June despite there being no deal in sight will be seen as a sign of his desire to get an agreement that avoids further economic problems at the end of this year.

Despite the tough language, there were also signs of movement on the EU side.

Mr Barnier hinted at a possible compromise over the EU’s demand that the UK continue to follow its state aid regime, which has previously been a red line for the bloc.

Mr Frost is seeking to intensify negotiations in the coming weeks, including holding the first face-to-face talks since coronavirus struck.

The Prime Minister will try to inject political momentum into the stalled process this month by holding direct discussions with European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen.

The talks have been disrupted by the pandemic, with two sides forced to conduct negotiations by video link.

Mr Frost yesterday said they were ‘close to reaching the limits of what can be achieved’ remotely. He said there was now a need to ‘intensify and accelerate our work’.

A source declined to put a new deadline on the talks, but added: ‘We are not up for a long negotiation over the next months well into the autumn where nobody knows what is going to happen.

‘October is too late for us to conclude this.’

European Union chief Brexit negotiatorMr Barnier hinted at a possible compromise over the EU¿s demand that the UK continue to follow its state aid regime, which has previously been a red line for the bloc

European Union chief Brexit negotiatorMr Barnier hinted at a possible compromise over the EU’s demand that the UK continue to follow its state aid regime, which has previously been a red line for the bloc

The talks are deadlocked over the issues of fishing rights and the EU’s demand for a ‘level playing field’. Mr Barnier accused the UK of failing to show ‘any true will’ to negotiate on fishing.

But British sources said that Brussels had to recognise that the UK would take full control of its waters from the end of this year and would then decide who fishes there.

The UK has rejected the EU’s demand for a detailed ‘level playing field’, arguing it goes far beyond the scope of a normal free trade agreement and would tie Britain into following the bloc’s laws indefinitely.

The idea to impose tariffs was not immediately welcomed by Brussels. ‘We floated that,’ the official said. ‘It fell slightly on stony ground at the moment but it is still in there in the discussions.

‘Obviously we would rather not go there but if it is what helps make progress, then we are willing to talk about that.

‘We will have to see if we get into those discussions and then see where it settles. We are not at that point yet.’

Mr Barnier yesterday acknowledged the negotiations needed ‘extra political momentum’ as the two sides remained ‘very far’ from agreement in key areas.

He said the ‘door is still open’ for the UK to extend the transition period beyond the end of this year, but this has been ruled out by No 10.

And he warned that failure to reach a deal would result in the imposition of a ‘hard border’ on the island of Ireland, which both sides have pledged to avoid. 

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMigwFodHRwczovL3d3dy5kYWlseW1haWwuY28udWsvbmV3cy9hcnRpY2xlLTgzOTMzMjMvQm9yaXMtSm9obnNvbi1vZmZlcnMtYWNjZXB0LUVVLXRhcmlmZnMtd2luLXRyYWRlLWRlYWwtYnJlYWstZGVhZGxvY2stQnJ1c3NlbHMuaHRtbNIBhwFodHRwczovL3d3dy5kYWlseW1haWwuY28udWsvbmV3cy9hcnRpY2xlLTgzOTMzMjMvYW1wL0JvcmlzLUpvaG5zb24tb2ZmZXJzLWFjY2VwdC1FVS10YXJpZmZzLXdpbi10cmFkZS1kZWFsLWJyZWFrLWRlYWRsb2NrLUJydXNzZWxzLmh0bWw?oc=5

2020-06-05 23:25:18Z
52780832811978

Coronavirus: WHO advises to wear masks in public areas - BBC News

The World Health Organization (WHO) has changed its advice on face masks, saying they should be worn in public to help stop the spread of coronavirus.

The global body said new information showed they could provide "a barrier for potentially infectious droplets".

Some countries around the world already recommend or mandate the wearing of face coverings in public.

The WHO had previously argued there was not enough evidence to say that healthy people should wear masks.

Dr Maria Van Kerkhove, the WHO's technical lead expert on Covid-19, told Reuters news agency the recommendation was for people to wear a "fabric mask - that is, a non-medical mask".

The organisation had always advised that medical face masks should be worn by people who are sick and those caring for them.

Globally, there have been 6.7 million confirmed coronavirus cases and nearly 400,000 deaths since the outbreak began late last year, according to data compiled by Johns Hopkins University.

What is the WHO's advice?

The organisation said its new guidance had been prompted by studies over recent weeks. "We are advising governments to encourage that the general public wear a mask," Dr Van Kerkhove said.

At the same time, the WHO stressed that face masks were just one of a range of tools that could be used to reduce the risk of transmission - and that they should not give people a false sense of protection.

"Masks on their own will not protect you from Covid-19," said WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus.

Big shift in guidance

This is a big shift in the WHO's guidance on when the public should cover their faces. For months, the organisation's experts stuck to the line that masks would encourage a false sense of security and would deprive medical professionals of badly needed protective equipment.

Those arguments have not gone away but at the same time the WHO acknowledges that new evidence has emerged on the risks of transmission.

It points to recent research that people can be highly infectious in the few days before they show symptoms and that some people catch the virus but never show symptoms at all, as I reported last weekend.

So where distancing is not possible, such as on public transport and in locations as varied as shops and refugee camps, it is suggested that faces are covered with homemade masks to avoid passing on the infection.

Over 60s with underlying health conditions should go further, the WHO said, and wear medical-grade masks to give themselves better protection.

What are the latest key developments globally?

In the UK, the government announced on Friday that hospital visitors and out-patients would be required to wear face coverings, and that hospital staff would have to wear medical masks, even if they were not in a clinical setting.

The guidance will come into force on 15 June, as more businesses open up and more pupils return to school. Also on Friday the UK became the second country to record more than 40,000 coronavirus-related deaths, after the US.

Media playback is unsupported on your device

In other developments around the world:

  • With more than 34,000 deaths, Brazil overtookItaly to become the country with the third-highest death toll worldwide
  • The EU commissioner for home affairs said member states should reopen their internal borders by end of June
  • Portugal will start reopening its beaches later on Saturday
  • Meanwhile in Poland, gyms, swimming pools and amusement parks will be reopened

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiKmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL2hlYWx0aC01Mjk0NTIxMNIBLmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL2FtcC9oZWFsdGgtNTI5NDUyMTA?oc=5

2020-06-05 23:23:41Z
52780825733813

Northwest and Southwest England could face tighter coronavirus lockdowns as cases surge - Express

This figure refers to the average number of people a coronavirus sufferer infects and if it rises above one it means the disease is spreading. Asked about the data at the most recent Government briefing, the Health and Social Care Secretary said the Government was looking to take a more localised approach to prevent further outbreaks. Mr Hancock said: “It is very important that you look at all of these different studies in the round.

“The study you mentioned is an important one but the overall assessment which is brought together by SAGE (Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies) which advises the Chief Medical Officer is what I look at.

“So we referred to the Office for National Statistics (ONS) study that is based on data rather than modelling but what I do is look at all of these different studies and the overall view of SAGE is that the R is between 0.7 and 0.9 and that it is higher in the South West of England and the North West of England but it remains below one in each area.”

But he added: “Now, that doesn't take away from the need to make sure that we spot and crackdown on localised outbreaks when they come.”

In the most recent update, the Government confirmed that there had been a further 357 coronavirus deaths in Britain.

Of these deaths, 343 came in England.

This means the British death toll has hit 40,261.

A leading Cambridge statistician who was not involved in the latest modeling told Mail Online that the findings on the R number were the “opposite of reassuring”.

They added: “No wonder members of SAGE are worried.”

READ MORE: UK economy warning: Britain was ‘already heading into a crisis’

London is the only English region with a higher number of cases.

At a briefing at the end of March, NHS medical director Stephen Powis said: “If we can keep deaths below 20,000 we will have done very well in this epidemic.=

“If it is less than 20,000, that would be a good result though every death is a tragedy, but we should not be complacent about that.”

The Government has announced all hospital staff and visitors will be made to wear face coverings.#

Mr Hancock said further guidance is expected by June 15.

Despite the lockdown beginning to be gradually eased, an ONS study found only 40 percent of adults in employment left the house to go to work in the last week.

Data from the previous week suggested the figure was slightly lower at 36 percent.

Meanwhile, an EU aviation report has placed 13 UK airports on a list of high-risk transport hubs.

They are Birmingham, Doncaster Sheffield, East Midlands, Gatwick, Glasgow, Heathrow, Leeds Bradford, Liverpool John Lennon, London City, Luton, Manchester Airport. Newcastle International and Stansted.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMieWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmV4cHJlc3MuY28udWsvbmV3cy91ay8xMjkyMDkzL1VLLWNvcm9uYXZpcnVzLWxhdGVzdC11cGRhdGVzLU1hdHQtSGFuY29jay1SLW51bWJlci1zb3V0aHdlc3Qtbm9ydGh3ZXN0LUVuZ2xhbmTSAX1odHRwczovL3d3dy5leHByZXNzLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvdWsvMTI5MjA5My9VSy1jb3JvbmF2aXJ1cy1sYXRlc3QtdXBkYXRlcy1NYXR0LUhhbmNvY2stUi1udW1iZXItc291dGh3ZXN0LW5vcnRod2VzdC1FbmdsYW5kL2FtcA?oc=5

2020-06-05 23:19:01Z
52780834019038

Coronavirus: Is the science about rising R rates just too politically inconvenient? - Sky News

Somewhere, under the cover of anonymity, government scientists appear to be muttering about the reliability of some of the more politically inconvenient coronavirus data coming out at the moment. 

This outburst of incognito pontification just so happens to have occurred on the day that no scientist appeared to have a free slot in their diary to take part in the daily coronavirus press conference, despite the clear utility of having a simple scientific explanation of the confusing picture the nation faces.

Curious. More on that later. First, some context.

preview image
Is government cherry-picking positive data?

Earlier, a study by Cambridge University, in conjunction with Public Health England (PHE), revealed that the R value - the number of secondary infections caused by a single infected individual - appears to be rising in England.

In the North West, it was likely to be above one, while in a second study it could be above one in the South West, meaning transmission is increasing in these communities.

It is hard to overstate the political significance of this moment. Politicians have made the R number the benchmark.

On 24 May, Boris Johnson told the nation "we must keep that R below one", health secretary Matt Hancock has pledged "at each step we'll closely monitor the impact on R".

More from Covid-19

And education secretary Gavin Williamson declared: "We can control coronavirus by ensuring the R does not go above one."

Yet now the R rate in England is between 0.7 and 1, and in parts of the country PHE and Britain's top government scientists appear to acknowledge in private it appears to be above one.

Despite this, no lockdown easing measures have been reversed. No sign the government is slowing on its initial timetable for getting the economy going again.

The Cambridge study goes further, attributing the rising R to lifting of lockdown measures, having traced on a timeline the date of the various relaxations with the increase in the infection levels.

The government is hoping that making antibody tests widely available lockdown restrictions can be further eased
Image: The government is hoping that making antibody tests widely available lockdown restrictions can be further eased

"This is probably due to increasing mobility and mixing between households and in public and workplace settings," says the study.

How worried should we be?

Well PHE, which co-authored the Cambridge University study revealing regional R value was above 1 in some areas, appeared intensely relaxed.

Dr Yvonne Doyle, medical director for PHE, said in a statement: "Our estimates show that the regional R numbers have increased although they remain below 1 for most of England - this is to be expected as we gradually move out of lockdown."

This is a significant statement. Firstly, it shows the government has abandoned the precautionary approach - the determination to play down the fact that some areas have infection rates increasing is apparent.

Secondly, it concedes the R rate is rising perilously close to 1 - something that politicians appeared to intimate was a bad thing - and says this is only to be expected.

:: Listen to the All Out Politics podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker

PHE, which is facing much of the blame from senior Conservatives for mistakes during the coronavirus pandemic, is part of Mr Hancock's health department.

So what of the government scientists' mutterings?

In public statements, officials imply this is nothing to worry about.

They now prefer to concentrate on dropping infection levels, even though there is huge discrepancy between the Office for National Statistics infection rate and that estimated by the Cambridge University modelling.

But now in briefings, they appear to go further. One BBC journalist said in a Zoom call with Cambridge scientists that SAGE scientists were saying the entire concept of regional R values was unreliable, and that they should not pay too much attention to them.

The Coastguard is urging people to 'follow the rules', saying 'coronavirus hasn't gone away'
Image: The government is continuing to ease lockdown rules

Apparently, effectively rubbishing an inconvenient study on the day of its release, but not saying so in public standing in front of the TV cameras.

The Cambridge team responded openly, saying they acknowledged the levels of uncertainty around their data but a consistent rise in the infection rates across the regions gave them confidence the data had validity.

How much does this matter? It is too early to say if this is part of a worrying politicisation of government scientists or something more harmless.

But, it is a trend worth keeping an eye on.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMidWh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2Nvcm9uYXZpcnVzLWlzLXRoZS1zY2llbmNlLWFib3V0LXJpc2luZy1yLXJhdGVzLWp1c3QtdG9vLXBvbGl0aWNhbGx5LWluY29udmVuaWVudC0xMjAwMTQwOdIBeWh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2FtcC9jb3JvbmF2aXJ1cy1pcy10aGUtc2NpZW5jZS1hYm91dC1yaXNpbmctci1yYXRlcy1qdXN0LXRvby1wb2xpdGljYWxseS1pbmNvbnZlbmllbnQtMTIwMDE0MDk?oc=5

2020-06-05 21:56:46Z
52780834019038