Selasa, 02 Juni 2020

England will have to wait FOUR WEEKS for lockdown changes under move sneaked out by Matt Hancock - Daily Mail

England will now have to wait FOUR WEEKS for changes to lockdown rules under move sneaked out by Matt Hancock today

  • Health regulations covering lockdown had to be reviewed every 21 days 
  • Hancock announced that was being extended to 28 days in written statement 
  • Told MPs it would allow ministers to make decisions 'at the right time' 
  • Here’s how to help people impacted by Covid-19

Ministers quietly changed the law governing reviews of the coronavirus lockdown today to allow them to take more time to make decisions.

Previously the health regulations under which the strict restrictions were brought in in May and eased slightly at the start of this week had to be reaffirmed every 21 days.

But Matt Hancock announced it was being lengthened by a full week to 28 days at the bottom of a Written Ministerial Statement issued this afternoon.

These are not announced in the House of Commons with an appearance at the dispatch box but instead are placed on the Parliamentary website, with physical copies available in Parliament.

In the statement he wrote: 'To ensure that we are making future decisions about the lockdown at the right time, the maximum review period will change from 21 days to 28 days. 

This will allow decisions to align more closely with the period of time necessary to assess the impact of previous changes on key data feeds, including the R rate. 

Matt Hancock announced the review period was being lengthened by a full week to 28 days at the bottom of a Written Ministerial Statement issued this afternoon, before he took the daily press conference

Matt Hancock announced the review period was being lengthened by a full week to 28 days at the bottom of a Written Ministerial Statement issued this afternoon, before he took the daily press conference

Today tens of thousands of people have been out shopping, eating and sunbathing on the hottest day of the year today, including at Bournemouth Beach (above)

Today tens of thousands of people have been out shopping, eating and sunbathing on the hottest day of the year today, including at Bournemouth Beach (above)

Previously the health regulations under which the strict restrictions were brought in in May and eased slightly at the start of this week had to be reaffirmed every 21 days

Previously the health regulations under which the strict restrictions were brought in in May and eased slightly at the start of this week had to be reaffirmed every 21 days

Britain on track to have NO Covid-19 deaths by the end of June

Britain is on track to have zero Covid-19 deaths by the end of June, a leading expert predicts, as the Department of Health announced 324 more coronavirus victims today.

Professor Carl Heneghan, University of Oxford, said he would expect there to be no 'excess deaths' when Office for National Statistics, which take into account both suspected and confirmed deaths, are published next week.

The weekly death toll in England and Wales has dropped to its lowest levels since the lockdown began, the ONS report today said. A total of 1,983 people in England and Wales died with Covid-19 in the week ending May 22, down 30 per cent in a week and the lowest figure for two months.

Both England and Wales - which suffered 16,000 deaths during the darkest fortnight of the crisis in April - are now en route to how they were before the unprecedented lockdown was imposed on March 23.

Advertisement

'The Government will also keep all the measures under continual review and will account to Parliament on an ongoing basis.'

Under the regulations brought in in March ministers had to formally extend the lockdown every three weeks and have done so until now, although they can ease or tighten the restrictions between these dates.

This means that the laws on  people meeting in groups outdoors were eased as of Monday and new measures from shops to reopen come into effect on June 15. 

Mr Hancock said the last time the extension was made was May 28, meaning the lockdown will officially stay in place until June 26, although there appears close to no chance it will be lifted then.

Today tens of thousands of people have been out shopping, eating and sunbathing on the hottest day of the year.

Police and security were even brought in to manage queues for fast food and flat-pack furniture across the UK.

Retail analyst Springboard told MailOnline they recorded an increase of shoppers in UK high streets of nearly one third yesterday, compared with the bank holiday Monday on May 25. 

Britain's Retail Parks saw a 12 per cent increase from the previous Monday, and a 36 per cent increase in the number of people in shopping centres, according to the data. 

This afternoon, in a further desperate attempt to hit and maintain his daily testing targets, Matt Hancock ordered people to get a Covid-19 test immediately if they feel ill, telling them it's their 'new duty'.

He said: 'It is a duty that we now ask and expect of people. If you have symptoms - that's a fever, a new continuous cough, a change in your sense of taste or smell - if you have one of these symptoms you must get a test. We have more than enough capacity to provide a test for anyone who needs one and we have more than enough capacity to trace all your contacts.'

Earlier today the Health Secretary was taken to task over 'misleading' coronavirus test figures by the UK's top statistician Sir David Norgrove, who accused him of spinning the numbers to make them look better. The exact number of people swabbed in England was listed as 'unavailable' by the Department of Heath for the tenth consecutive day yesterday.

Government sees off revolt by shielding MPs and those who want to carry on voting from home during lockdown 

The government dramatically saw off a revolt over ditching the virtual Commons tonight after hundreds of MPs conducted a chaotic mile-long 'conga' through Parliament to vote.

Amid extraordinary scenes, Speaker Lindsay Hoyle urged politicians to 'keep coming' and berated them for dawdling as they trotted around the estate and filed through a series of pens in Westminster Hall before entering the Commons chamber to confirm their name and whether they wanted to vote 'Aye' or 'Noe'.

Angry MPs took selfies and grumbled as they waited their turn, branding the 44-minute process - three times as long as normal - a 'farce' and saying it would be dark before they finished.

A 'hybrid' system to allow politicians to contribute to proceedings via Zoom while some remain in the chamber has been dropped on the return from recess, along with e-voting.

Leader of the House Mr Rees-Mogg told the Commons this afternoon the 'halfway' arrangements could not continue. 'What was unacceptable for a few short weeks would have proved unsustainable if we had allowed the hybrid proceedings to continue,' he said. 'Voting while enjoying a sunny walk or whilst watching television do democracy an injustice.'

The government saw off an amendment that would have kept electronic voting by 242 to 185, despite a revolt by senior Tories including Greg Clark, Tom Tugendhat and Craig Whittaker.

But MPs across parties with children or staying home for health conditions have been incensed by the new scheme, with one jibing that unlike wealthy Mr Rees-Mogg 'not all of us have live-in nannies'. 

Lib Dem MP Munira Wilson said she was being made to 'put my husband who's on immuno-suppressants at greater risk'.

The independent equality watchdog added its voice to the condemnation this afternoon, saying those shielding were being 'disadvantaged'.

Priti Patel POSTPONES publishing tourist quarantine details amid massive Tory backlash at muddled plans that could see 60% of travel jobs go unless she accepts air-bridge plans

The Government has delayed unveiling its new quarantine plans for new arrivals to Britain as MPs and tourism bosses demanded they be thrown out.

Details of the scheme, which is due to come into force on Monday June 8 were expected to be revealed to MPs today. 

But Downing Street has confirmed that Home Secretary Priti Patel is expected to unveil them tomorrow, fuelling suggestions that some sort of compromise could be on the cards.

It came as Boris Johnson was told to drops the plans to force visitors and returning British nationals to self-isolate for 14 days to avoid a 'catastrophic' hammer blow to the tourism and hospitality industries.

Some 124 chief executive and owners of businesses worth a combined £5billion said today they expect to make up to 60 per cent of their staff redundant if the scheme goes ahead.

The Prime Minister is believed to be backing air bridges to low-infection countries as the government scrambles to head off a huge Tory revolt.  

MPs have also branded the curbs 'ridiculous' and 'pointless' after it emerged people will be allowed to pop out for food, only a fifth face spot checks, and officials will not be allowed to enter their homes. 

The new quarantine rules will allow people subject to the 14-day restrictions to leave their place of isolation for a number of reasons, including shopping for food. 

Travellers will also be able to board public transport from the port or airport to where they will quarantine, although they will be encouraged to use private vehicles instead. 

But the rules will only be in place for an initial three weeks, with the first review on June 29. 

Campaigner  George Morgan-Grenville, the chief executive of tour operator Red Savannah, said: 'By pursuing its quarantine plans without due regard for the economic consequences, the Government is choosing to ignore the devastation it will cause to companies, to employment and to the lives of all those whose jobs will be lost.

'The quarantine measures are a blunt weapon which will bring only economic disaster.' 

Just 23 people used Gatwick Airport in an entire day last week - down from its pre-covid average of 45,000

Just 23 people used Gatwick Airport in an entire day last week - down from its pre-covid average of 45,000

The detail of the proposals is expected to be laid in Parliament by Home Secretary Priti Patel later, although there might well not be a vote.

How UK coronavirus cases compare to 15 popular holiday destinations for Britons  

Tourism bosses and MPs have discussed air bridges to popular tourist destinations and countries who send large numbers of tourist to the UK.

Here is how the UK's coronavoirus cases compare to popular nations. The figures are the daily confirmed cases of coronavirus per million people for each country, as of June 1.

UK - 28.52

SPAIN - 4.30

FRANCE - 3.94

ITALY - 5.87

USA - 59.84

GREECE - 0.19

PORTUGAL - 29.13

NETHERLANDS - 10.80

TURKEY - 9.85

IRELAND - 12.35

GERMANY - 3.98

BELGIUM - 16.82

MEXICO - 24.45

MOROCCO - 0.73

AUSTRALIA - 0.39

NEW ZEALAND - 0

The rules are due to take effect on Monday, but a there are growing signs the measures will be scaled back again when they are reviewed in three weeks. 

The air bridges plan, championed by Transport Secretary Grant Shapps, could see restrictions eased on countries like Australia and Greece with low levels of coronavirus. It offers some hopes of summer holidays for Britons as the nation struggles to get back to normal after months of lockdown. 

Ministers are expected to use a five-point assessment to judge which countries could be prioritised for the agreements. 

The criteria could include the economic and cultural ties to the UK, the infection rate and the level of health screening at departure airports.  

A country's R rate of infection is likely to be the key factor in whether an air bridge agreement is considered.   

The news comes as MPs urged the government to rethink the 14-day quarantine to avoid killing off the airline industry.    

Tory MP Henry Smith, whose Crawley constituency covers Gatwick, said low passengers at the airport last week highlighted the scale of the problem.   

He said: 'It's well-intentioned but it hasn't been thought through.

'It sounds good, to stop people at the borders so we don't get re-infections of Covid-19. But I don't think it is going to be a benefit to public health and will prolong the economic damage.'

Travel industry experts say quarantine, will cost Britain's tourism sector as much as £15billion if it is maintained throughout the summer.

Under the plans, people arriving in the UK from Britain, including citizens returning from abroad, will have to self-isolate for two weeks. 

There are exemptions for groups including lorry drivers, health workers and scientists. 

Spot checks will be carried out on addresses and fines of £1,000 could be imposed on people breaking the rules.

EasyJet says it will resume flights to almost 75% of its network by August 

EasyJet has announced it will resume flying to almost three-quarters of its route network by August.

The airline is also launching what it claims is its 'biggest ever summer sale' with over one million flights to holiday destinations across Europe on offer from £29.99 for travel between July 1 and October 31, 2020.

Onboard, all passengers and crew will be required to wear face masks. 

EasyJet said it plans to fly 50 per cent of its 1,022 routes in July and 75 per cent in August, although flight frequency will be much lower, equating to around 30 per cent of normal July to September capacity.

This will include flying to and from its UK bases across July and August to a selection of destinations for summer holidays.

The airline said that although there will be fewer flights on offer, 'customers will have the choice of flights to domestic, city and beach destinations'.

These include cities such as Paris, Milan and Rome; 'summer sun favourites' the Balearics and Canary Islands; 'lively and culturally rich hotspots' in Italy, Croatia and Portugal and 'even further afield to exotic destinations, Egypt and Morocco'.

The airline has confirmed that some flights will initially resume from June 15 including those from London Gatwick, Bristol, Birmingham, Liverpool, Newcastle, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Inverness and Belfast in the UK.

But according to the Guardian, only a fifth of arrivals will be subject to spot checks. 

People will be able to give more than one address where they will be self-isolating - and will also be allowed to go out to buy food – including for pets – or medicine.

'To get caught, you will either have to be unlucky or stupid,' one source said.  

Like the wider lockdown measures, the plans will be reviewed every three weeks.

Former transport minister Stephen Hammond asked what the point of the quarantine was when it could be dodged relatively easily.

The Tory MP told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that air bridges would be a 'sensible, targeted response' between low-risk countries.

'I think the idea of air bridges are the right way forward,' he added.

'I think, as we've seen across the world, people are taking measures out of the lockdown and this targeted approach would be a much more sensible way to behave.'

The air bridges idea was first floated by Mr Shapps last month, before being played down by No10 sources.

However, sources told the Telegraph that Mr Johnson is now 'personally in favour' of the plan. 

Priti Patel, the home secretary, is thought to remain sceptical. 

Travel companies are offering up to 65 per cent off summer holidays – but tourism experts are warning Britons the trips may not end up going ahead.

The bargain packages are being advertised on booking sites for as early as July in a bid to salvage the season.

It came as last night the holiday dreams of millions of Britons were given a boost after Portugal and Greece said they were ready to welcome back UK tourists within days.

Tui, Britain's biggest tour operator, is cutting three nights all-inclusive at the TUI SUNEO Odessos in Bulgaria on July 10 from £543 per person to £296. And a seven-night trip to Gran Canaria on July 6 has been slashed from £606 to £394.

Travel Zoo is offering two nights in Paris in September for £79 – up to 64 per cent cheaper than usual.

And easyJet Holidays is selling a week-long stay at Anseli Hotel in Rhodes from July 8 for £195 with flights and transfers.

But experts have warned desperate Britons to hold off booking for now.

The Foreign Office still advises against all but essential travel and there will be a two-week quarantine for returning holidaymakers from June 8.

Rory Boland, editor of Which? Travel, said: 'If consumers are keen to book something now they should go into it with their eyes open.

'If the FCO advice is still in place when their holiday is due to take place, they will get a refund, but there's a good chance they will be waiting a long time.

'Holiday providers need to make it clear to their customers that these holidays may not take place.'

The UK quarantine will be reviewed every three weeks. TUI spokesman Liz Edwards said they hope it will be lifted on June 29 in time for summer trips.

She added: 'We believe we will be having summer holidays this year, hopefully from July. We hope the quarantine will be lifted, but air bridges are certainly a possibility.

'Bookings have been really picking up. Spain, Greece, Cyprus are likely to open up first. The Canaries and Balearics are keen to welcome back tourists.'

Airlines are also heavily discounting flights. A Heathrow to Cancun return with Air France in September, which usually sells for around £800, is being advertised for £312.

And return flights from Manchester to Reykjavik with easyJet in November are being sold for £41 (usually £150 plus), and Manchester to Dubrovnik with Jet2 from £30 one-way in late June (usually around £120).

Emma Coulthurst, from TravelSupermarket, said: 'The 14-day quarantine measure makes holidays pretty impractical, although I have heard of some people willing to do it to get a holiday. There is a risk booking now as there is no guarantee the holiday will go ahead.'

Research by TUI revealed the most popular destinations for trips this year are Spain, Greece and Italy followed by Florida and the Caribbean.

And those hoping to go to Greece or Portugal this summer could still get the chance.

Officials in Lisbon believe Britain has coronavirus 'under control' and want quarantine-free travel between the two countries to restart from this Saturday.

Greece's tourism minister Harry Theocharis told the Mail the epidemic was moving 'in the right direction' in the UK and restrictions could be dropped for Britons from June 15.

The interventions increased pressure on Downing Street to re-think its plan for a 'blanket' 14-day quarantine amid a growing backlash from MPs at being denied a vote on the measures.

Ms Patel will today introduce the regulations in Parliament to come into effect from next Monday.

But they will be brought as a statutory instrument, which does not automatically go to a vote. Tory MPs are expecting the government to give a strong signal on air bridges to head off an outright rebellion.

Home Secretary Priti Patel (pictured) will today introduce the regulations in Parliament to come into effect from next Monday

Home Secretary Priti Patel (pictured) will today introduce the regulations in Parliament to come into effect from next Monday

Under the plans, anyone entering the country by plane, train or boat will have to go into quarantine for two weeks.

This will apply to foreign tourists as well as Britons returning from abroad.

However, some people, including medical professionals and lorry drivers, will be exempt.

MPs among a cross-party group of at least 40 who are critical of the plans last night voiced their fury.

They want the Government to leave open the option of creating 'air bridges' – which would allow tourists between two countries to visit without needing to quarantine – to salvage as much of the summer holiday season as possible and help keep the hard-hit tourism industry afloat.

They say, instead of quarantine, arrivals to the UK could be subject to health checks or testing.

Industry chiefs say millions of Britons are desperate for a foreign getaway, but the blanket quarantine policy has all but cancelled summer holidays.

Former Cabinet minister David Davis said: 'Parliament should be properly involved and quite plainly it is not. In this particular case, its very blanket policy could reasonably be amended in a number of ways. 

'For example, our death rate is many, many times than that in Greece. So the idea of quarantining someone coming from Greece who would have a much lower risk of suffering from the disease than someone anywhere else in Britain is plainly not supported by any sort of science.

'The idea of putting in air bridges might be a sensible amendment.'

Former environment secretary Theresa Villiers said: 'I would very much prefer the quarantine rules be targeted on flights from Covid hotspots.

'I appreciate why the Government is bringing in quarantine but I do think that applying it in a blanket way across the board is an over-reaction.'

Sir Graham Brady, chairman of the influential 1922 Committee of Tory backbenchers, said: 'I hope the Government will move swiftly to introduce air bridges and also to introduce a testing regime at airports as quickly as possible.'

Downing Street last night insisted it still intended to push ahead with the policy.

It has stressed quarantine will be reviewed every three weeks and has left open the possibility of striking air bridge deals in future.

But the first review period would not be until June 29. 

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMic2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmRhaWx5bWFpbC5jby51ay9uZXdzL2FydGljbGUtODM4MDg5MS9FbmdsYW5kLXdhaXQtRk9VUi1XRUVLUy1sb2NrZG93bi1jaGFuZ2VzLXNuZWFrZWQtTWF0dC1IYW5jb2NrLmh0bWzSAXdodHRwczovL3d3dy5kYWlseW1haWwuY28udWsvbmV3cy9hcnRpY2xlLTgzODA4OTEvYW1wL0VuZ2xhbmQtd2FpdC1GT1VSLVdFRUtTLWxvY2tkb3duLWNoYW5nZXMtc25lYWtlZC1NYXR0LUhhbmNvY2suaHRtbA?oc=5

2020-06-02 16:58:36Z
52780826084493

Coronavirus: Health Secretary Matt Hancock leads latest COVID-19 briefing - Sky News

Black and Asian ethnic groups up to twice as likely to die with COVID-19, says Public Health England

People from black and Asian ethnic groups are up to twice as likely to die with COVID-19 than those from a white British background, according to a Public Health England report.

People of Bangladeshi ethnicity were found to have around twice the risk of death.

Chinese, Indian, Pakistani, Other Asian, Caribbean and Other Black ethnicities had between 10 and 50% greater risk of dying.

The highest diagnosis rate per 100,000 population was in black ethnic groups (486 in females and 649 in males) and the lowest in white ethnic groups (220 in females and 224 in males).

The report said its findings confirm "the impact of COVID-19 has replicated existing health inequalities and, in some cases, has increased them".

Health Secretary Matt Hancock said coming from a non-white background was a "major risk factor" when it comes to the pandemic.

He welcomed the report and told the Commons: "Black lives matter - as do those of the poorest areas of our country, which have worse health outcomes."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMibGh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2Nvcm9uYXZpcnVzLWhlYWx0aC1zZWNyZXRhcnktbWF0dC1oYW5jb2NrLWxlYWRzLWxhdGVzdC1jb3ZpZC0xOS1icmllZmluZy0xMTk5OTI4MdIBcGh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2FtcC9jb3JvbmF2aXJ1cy1oZWFsdGgtc2VjcmV0YXJ5LW1hdHQtaGFuY29jay1sZWFkcy1sYXRlc3QtY292aWQtMTktYnJpZWZpbmctMTE5OTkyODE?oc=5

2020-06-02 15:31:20Z
CBMibGh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2Nvcm9uYXZpcnVzLWhlYWx0aC1zZWNyZXRhcnktbWF0dC1oYW5jb2NrLWxlYWRzLWxhdGVzdC1jb3ZpZC0xOS1icmllZmluZy0xMTk5OTI4MdIBcGh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2FtcC9jb3JvbmF2aXJ1cy1oZWFsdGgtc2VjcmV0YXJ5LW1hdHQtaGFuY29jay1sZWFkcy1sYXRlc3QtY292aWQtMTktYnJpZWZpbmctMTE5OTkyODE

Matt Hancock criticised by regulator over UK coronavirus testing figures - Financial Times

Matt Hancock received an unusually stern reprimand from the UK’s statistical regulator on Tuesday for exaggerating the number of coronavirus tests being carried out by his health department.

In a letter to the health secretary, David Norgrove, chair of the UK Statistics Authority, described the government’s daily coronavirus testing figures as “far from complete and comprehensible”.

“The aim seems to be to show the largest possible number of tests, even at the expense of understanding,” Sir David wrote.

Mr Hancock and other ministers have hailed the UK’s 200,000 per day Covid-19 testing capacity but have not been able to provide figures for the numbers of people being tested daily.

Many people have been tested more than once and tests have been counted as completed even if they were posted but never returned.

“The testing statistics still fall well short of [the UKSA’s] expectations,” wrote Sir David. “It is not surprising that, given their inadequacy, data on testing are so widely criticised and often mistrusted.”

He added that the figures gave an “artificially low impression” of the proportion of positive test results because they compared a small subset of those testing positive with the total number of tests issued.

He called for the publication of data showing how many people were tested over time, and for much simpler reporting of the number of tests carried out in the UK.

Sir David added that Mr Hancock’s statistics fell short of the national code of conduct for statistics. “The testing figures are presented in a way that is difficult to understand. Many of the key numbers make little sense without recourse to the technical notes, which are themselves sometimes hard to follow,” he said.

He said that the figures failed to help the public understand the epidemic or show how many people were infected, nor did they help the department of health. It was “hard to believe the statistics work to support the testing programme itself,” he said.

Sir David called for a complete overhaul of the reporting of coronavirus testing to help the government with its test, trace and isolate programme and also inform the public how many people were being tested and were found to have the virus.

He said the health department should publish the number of tests and results for key workers, especially in medical fields, and demographic breakdowns by age, sex and region. He added that it needed to answer the questions “How many people in what circumstances are infected? Where do they live?”

To enable a test and trace system to work effectively, the letter continued, the health department should issue a statement of the most important measures it wanted to track and then publish statistics that enabled assessment of the department’s performance.

In Germany, for example, the government’s Robert Koch Institute publishes a detailed daily summary of positive cases, including any concentrated outbreaks in a local area.

Sir David’s letter was the second he had written to Mr Hancock calling for an improvement in publishing data. Replying to the first, the health secretary pledged to engage with the UKSA to improve how testing was reported and said he strongly supported “the clear, open and transparent reporting of statistics on Covid-19 tests”.

The department of health said: “The secretary of state has spoken to Sir David and reiterated the department’s commitment to continuing to work closely with the UKSA to address their concerns.

“We have sought to work closely with the UKSA throughout our response to coronavirus to ensure statistics, which are prepared in very challenging circumstances, are presented in the best way possible.

“Our approach throughout has been to increase transparency around the government’s response to coronavirus.”

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiP2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZ0LmNvbS9jb250ZW50LzJjMzJkNzJmLThiZjMtNGE0Ni04YzJhLTg3ODE3MjFjYzBkYtIBP2h0dHBzOi8vYW1wLmZ0LmNvbS9jb250ZW50LzJjMzJkNzJmLThiZjMtNGE0Ni04YzJhLTg3ODE3MjFjYzBkYg?oc=5

2020-06-02 13:06:45Z
CAIiEL6Cpm6AcOO7tWe_ZmO5Aw8qGAgEKg8IACoHCAow-4fWBzD4z0gw_fCpBg

The new era of quarantine: a muddled set of travel rules - Financial Times

When Hope Ailsa checked in to the luxurious InterContinental Sydney hotel for 14 days of coronavirus quarantine, she soon found she was not about to have anything resembling a holiday.

“We weren’t allowed outside our room,” says the superyacht captain, who returned home from the Philippines in April after Australia brought in some of the earliest and tightest pandemic quarantine rules.

“The windows didn’t open and there was no fresh air. They posted two guards on each floor and if you opened your door they would stare at you and tell you to close it.”

“I was crying,” she says, explaining she is a heavy smoker and had savage withdrawal symptoms until the reception desk ordered nicotine patches. To get through her stay she started running laps of her room, covering about 1km a day, and took up toilet-roll bowling.

Residents of Quezon City, Philippines, as Manila reached 76 days in quarantine, one of world's strictest due to coronavirus © Rolex Dela Pena/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock

Her experience convinced her that two weeks in captivity, even in a five-star hotel overlooking the Opera House, could affect mental health. Yet she still thinks that confining apparently healthy people is necessary. Being free to travel and spread infection would be unfair, she says.

Her support for a practice that dates back to at least the Middle Ages is widely shared. More than 140 countries and territories have brought in quarantine measures since January, according to data compiled by the International SOS medical and security services group, a level experts say is unprecedented.

With little obvious debate and consultation, or even agreement among scientists about when to apply it, governments around the world have decided that isolating arrivals from other countries is an essential response to coronavirus — and, in some cases, could remain so for quite some time.

“We are witnessing a unique moment in history,” says Eugenia Tognotti, professor of history of medicine at Italy’s University of Sassari. “There has never been another time when such a large percentage of the global population has faced quarantine.”

For some public health experts, the speed at which countries have cracked down on people’s movement to stem the spread of the virus has come as a relief.

“I was very happily surprised,” says Dr Rodrigo Rodriguez-Fernandez, a medical director at International SOS. It is hard enough to put a national healthcare policy in place, he says, so the rapid spread of quarantine measures was “really refreshing”.

People waiting to be fed by soldiers running a quarantine camp on the Franco-Italian border during the 1884 cholera epidemic © Hulton Archive/Getty

Yet this new world of confinement has also brought problems. Human rights groups say some governments have used quarantine as a pretext to make arbitrary arrests or boost military action.

Elsewhere, rules have sprung up so haphazardly it has created a confusing hodgepodge of travel rules that have begun to alarm transport and tourism companies.

Authorities have commonly quarantined arriving travellers for 14 days, a period researchers deemed safe for a virus with an average incubation period of about five days. But the rules are by no means uniform.

Quarantine in Myanmar has meant up to 21 days of confinement for some arrivals. Samoa has required 14 days of isolation before you arrive and 14 days after you get there. Some countries put you in a hotel; others let you go home. Some require a test for Covid-19 before arrival, others once you get there.

Gloria Guevara Manzo, chief executive of the World Travel & Tourism Council, says countries must unite and 'learn from the past' © Sebastiao Moreira/EPA

Co-ordination problem

For the travel and tourism industry, which supports an estimated one in 10 jobs worldwide, this jumble of measures is a worrying reminder of what happened after the September 11, 2001 attacks in the US, when countries launched an array of different airport safety rules, many of which lasted until this year.

That lack of alignment after 9/11 is one reason it took the industry five years to recover, says Gloria Guevara Manzo, chief executive of the World Travel & Tourism Council. “We have to learn from the past,” she told a Financial Times conference last month, adding it took only 18 months for the sector to regain its feet after the 2008 financial crisis when there was better co-ordination among countries.

However, more than four months after the first coronavirus quarantine measures were imposed in China, where the outbreak began, co-ordination has been slow internationally and even within individual countries. In the US, Texas began easing its 14-day quarantine rules for out-of-state visitors as early as April but similar restrictions were still in place last week in states such as Alaska.

The disparity is especially acute in Europe, where countries including Italy, Spain and Greece are planning to loosen their quarantine requirements as summer nears — just as the UK, one of the region’s largest economies, introduces them.

Travellers respect social distancing as they wait for saliva sample results in a coronavirus testing facility at the AsiaWorld-Expo in Hong Kong © Laurel Chor/Bloomberg

The UK has bucked international trends throughout the pandemic by failing to impose the quarantine rules, airport testing or tighter border controls that other nations introduced. To the fury of British airlines and hotels, it has now decided that from June 8, arrivals from abroad will have to self-isolate for 14 days or face a £1,000 fine.

There will be exemptions for freight drivers, doctors and others. But the step is “the very last thing the travel industry needs”, according to a letter to the government endorsed by more than 200 travel and hospitality companies. The “unworkable” move would deter foreign visitors and probably spur reciprocal quarantine requirements on British travellers, they said.

Boris Johnson, the prime minister, has said the government did not bring in quarantine earlier because “the scientific advice was very clear that it would make no difference” to the arrival of the epidemic. It was acting now, as infection rates were falling, because it did not want to see a wave of reinfection from abroad, he said.

One scientist who has attended the UK government’s scientific advisory group on emergencies, or Sage, told the FT in April that quarantine would have been economically disastrous for an island nation supplied by thousands of Channel-crossing lorries each day.

This is not the first time Britain has stood out on such matters.

The World Health Organisation was created in 1948 in the wake of a series of 19th-century “international sanitary conferences”. These wrestled with the need to agree on quarantine procedures to stop the spread of diseases, such as cholera, without unduly disrupting international trade.

At the first conference, convened by France in 1851, “maritime nations, notably Britain, wanted to minimise any health regulations that would interfere with the free flow of trade”, says a paper by Charles Clift, senior consulting fellow at the Chatham House think-tank who has studied the history of global health institutions.

The editor of a German medical journal later noted the “surprising concordance between England’s commercial interests and its scientific convictions”, the paper adds.

A passenger in a decontamination tent after arriving at Ninoy Aquino international airport, Manila © Ezra Acayan/Getty

Economic cost

The struggle to preserve both public and financial health has continued ever since, not least when it comes to the current pandemic.

The World Health Organisation has long been wary of curbing the movement of people or goods in a public health emergency, in part because it says such restrictions are often ineffective and can have negative economic effects.

Asked last week if this was still the case, a spokesman pointed to written WHO advice saying travel measures that significantly interfere with international traffic for more than 24 hours “may have a public health rationale at the beginning of the containment phase of an outbreak”, as they can buy time for countries to prepare.

“Such restrictions, however, need to be short in duration, proportionate to the public health risks, and be reconsidered regularly as the situation evolves,” it said.

So why have so many countries ignored this? One possible answer: panic. Covid-19 spread at a much faster rate than most countries expected. The sight of overwhelmed hospitals in developed countries such as Italy may have jolted governments into action.

In many countries, the public welcomed the move. Quarantine has been part of a suite of travel restrictions credited with keeping death rates low in countries such as New Zealand and Australia, which had recorded fewer than 130 Covid-19 deaths between them at the time of writing.

Travellers from Wuhan gather to take buses as they are taken to do 14 days of quarantine after arriving in Beijing  © Kevin Frayer/Getty

At one point, more than two-thirds of Australia’s confirmed Covid-19 cases were returning travellers, according to Brendan Murphy, the country’s chief medical officer. More than 33,800 people have been quarantined in the country since both national and internal state borders began to close in March, mostly in hotels with governments footing the bill.

Things have not always run smoothly. In Perth, a man was jailed after repeatedly sneaking out of his quarantine hotel room. A 70-year-old man in the same city ended up in intensive care after falling ill in hotel quarantine where his wife’s pleas for medical help at first went unanswered.

In New Zealand, anguished relatives have gone to court to overturn quarantine rules that stopped them seeing dying family members.

But the countries’ success in stemming the virus shows that measures such as quarantine work, says Dr Bharat Pankhania, senior clinical lecturer at the University of Exeter’s college of medicine and health.

“It worked. What more do you want?” he told the FT. The UK’s larger population and arrival numbers might have made quarantine harder but not impossible, he added. “Because that was seen as a tall order, they said, ‘can’t be done’. Anything is possible if you want to do it.”

Istanbul airport. Turkey has recently restarted a limited number of domestic flights © Chris McGrath/Getty

An era of travel bubbles?

Some countries have begun to ease their quarantine measures, but for financially stricken airlines the policy has been a source of contention from the start of the pandemic.

“We are concerned about the deployment of such measures of quarantine because it is a major deterrent to air travel,” says Alexandre de Juniac, director-general of the International Air Transport Association.

Instead of quarantine, aviation and tourism companies are pushing for common international standards on how to manage travel, including temperature checks at airports, wearing face masks during transit, social distancing where possible at the airport and increased cleaning of equipment.

The travel industry is also backing quarantine-free “air bridges”, “bubbles” or “travel corridors” set up between countries with low infection rates. Australia and New Zealand have agreed to establish a “Trans-Tasman travel bubble”, while countries including Israel, Greece and Cyprus have discussed a tourism safe zone in the eastern Mediterranean.

John Holland-Kaye, chief executive of London’s Heathrow airport, where average passenger numbers have fallen from about 250,000 a day to almost 6,000, says there are other factors to consider.

“There is no perfect way currently to say that one person has the disease and another one doesn’t, but we can say one country is low-risk and, therefore, we should accept passengers coming in from there. And, reciprocally, they will accept passengers from us if we are seen as low risk,” he told the FT.

“It seems exactly the right kind of approach rather than a blanket 14-day quarantine to any arriving passenger which will stop people flying and hold back the economy,” he said.

Heathrow airport, London. Aviation and tourism companies are pushing for international standards, eg wearing face masks during transit, as an alternative to tougher quarantine measures © Tolga Akmen/AFP/Getty

Heathrow is working with 10 other major hub airports around the world, including Hong Kong, Sydney and San Francisco, to try to establish the same health measures globally, as a way of fast tracking the “air bridge” idea. However, this is ultimately a decision for governments.

Meanwhile, anyone hoping to see an end to quarantine soon cannot ignore the country where the coronavirus outbreak began: China.

It is now more than four months since Wuhan, the city where the virus was first detected, was cordoned off. Mass quarantine later enveloped the entire province of Hubei and its 60m people. Measures were later adopted to safeguard Beijing from exposure to the virus, keeping the capital’s total number of infections to about 500.

How quarantine rules differ across the world

United Kingdom From June 8, residents and visitors will be required to spend 14 days self-isolating in one place, or face a £1,000 fine. People will also be asked to provide contact details and may be fined £100 if they refuse.

Hong Kong On arrival, passengers without symptoms must be tested for Covid-19 and then await the results. People with negative results may be able to leave and go home for 14 days of compulsory quarantine, during which they must check their temperature twice daily and record their health conditions.

Austria Non-citizens coming in by land from neighbouring countries must present a health certificate no more than four days old that confirms a negative test result for the virus. Citizens returning home must undergo a 14-day home quarantine and if a test done during this time is negative, the quarantine can be ended.

Indonesia Arrivals must show a health certificate confirming a negative Covid-19 result from a test taken no more than seven days before arrival. Those who arrive without such a certificate are required to undergo a test and quarantine on arrival, at their own expense, until the test results are received, which can take up to seven days.

Ireland Arrivals from abroad, including returning Irish citizens, must stay indoors and avoid contact with other people for 14 days.

While foreign arrivals to China have drawn to a trickle, internal travellers have been subject to strict but inconsistent quarantine rules.

When Wuhan reopened to travel on April 8, those heading to Beijing found the trip more difficult than advertised. Arrivals were greeted by local officials in hazmat suits who bussed them directly from the train station to their home or government facility.

Some districts allowed returnees to quarantine at home with relatively few restrictions; in some cases a note promising not to set foot outside sufficed. In other districts, officials taped shut the returnees’ doors and put a sensor device outside the door that would alert authorities if it was opened.

Some areas of Beijing refused all residents returning from Wuhan, barred them from going to their homes and forced them to proceed directly to a government facility for a 14-day stint.

Editor’s note

The Financial Times is making key coronavirus coverage free to read to help everyone stay informed. Find the latest here.

Regulations in Beijing have eased in recent weeks. However, in northern China, where a cluster of cases was recently discovered, large cities such as Harbin in Heilongjiang have been locked down and quarantine measures enforced.

Even in the country that first experienced Covid-19 and took some of the most radical steps to quash it, life is still not entirely as it was.

With prospects of a vaccine or proven treatment still unknown, that may remain the case around the world for quite a while to come.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiP2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZ0LmNvbS9jb250ZW50LzRkMGMwNGE2LWFiMTItNGUyZS1iZGMzLTJhZjVmYTRlMTJkN9IBAA?oc=5

2020-06-02 11:49:59Z
CAIiELp1Ibsdg0FCGoen7V6WTgQqGAgEKg8IACoHCAow-4fWBzD4z0gw_fCpBg

The new era of quarantine: a muddled set of travel rules - Financial Times

When Hope Ailsa checked in to the luxurious InterContinental Sydney hotel for 14 days of coronavirus quarantine, she soon found she was not about to have anything resembling a holiday.

“We weren’t allowed outside our room,” says the superyacht captain, who returned home from the Philippines in April after Australia brought in some of the earliest and tightest pandemic quarantine rules.

“The windows didn’t open and there was no fresh air. They posted two guards on each floor and if you opened your door they would stare at you and tell you to close it.”

“I was crying,” she says, explaining she is a heavy smoker and had savage withdrawal symptoms until the reception desk ordered nicotine patches. To get through her stay she started running laps of her room, covering about 1km a day, and took up toilet-roll bowling.

Residents of Quezon City, Philippines, as Manila reached 76 days in quarantine, one of world's strictest due to coronavirus © Rolex Dela Pena/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock

Her experience convinced her that two weeks in captivity, even in a five-star hotel overlooking the Opera House, could affect mental health. Yet she still thinks that confining apparently healthy people is necessary. Being free to travel and spread infection would be unfair, she says.

Her support for a practice that dates back to at least the Middle Ages is widely shared. More than 140 countries and territories have brought in quarantine measures since January, according to data compiled by the International SOS medical and security services group, a level experts say is unprecedented.

With little obvious debate and consultation, or even agreement among scientists about when to apply it, governments around the world have decided that isolating arrivals from other countries is an essential response to coronavirus — and, in some cases, could remain so for quite some time.

“We are witnessing a unique moment in history,” says Eugenia Tognotti, professor of history of medicine at Italy’s University of Sassari. “There has never been another time when such a large percentage of the global population has faced quarantine.”

For some public health experts, the speed at which countries have cracked down on people’s movement to stem the spread of the virus has come as a relief.

“I was very happily surprised,” says Dr Rodrigo Rodriguez-Fernandez, a medical director at International SOS. It is hard enough to put a national healthcare policy in place, he says, so the rapid spread of quarantine measures was “really refreshing”.

People waiting to be fed by soldiers running a quarantine camp on the Franco-Italian border during the 1884 cholera epidemic © Hulton Archive/Getty

Yet this new world of confinement has also brought problems. Human rights groups say some governments have used quarantine as a pretext to make arbitrary arrests or boost military action.

Elsewhere, rules have sprung up so haphazardly it has created a confusing hodgepodge of travel rules that have begun to alarm transport and tourism companies.

Authorities have commonly quarantined arriving travellers for 14 days, a period researchers deemed safe for a virus with an average incubation period of about five days. But the rules are by no means uniform.

Quarantine in Myanmar has meant up to 21 days of confinement for some arrivals. Samoa has required 14 days of isolation before you arrive and 14 days after you get there. Some countries put you in a hotel; others let you go home. Some require a test for Covid-19 before arrival, others once you get there.

Gloria Guevara Manzo, chief executive of the World Travel & Tourism Council, says countries must unite and 'learn from the past' © Sebastiao Moreira/EPA

Co-ordination problem

For the travel and tourism industry, which supports an estimated one in 10 jobs worldwide, this jumble of measures is a worrying reminder of what happened after the September 11, 2001 attacks in the US, when countries launched an array of different airport safety rules, many of which lasted until this year.

That lack of alignment after 9/11 is one reason it took the industry five years to recover, says Gloria Guevara Manzo, chief executive of the World Travel & Tourism Council. “We have to learn from the past,” she told a Financial Times conference last month, adding it took only 18 months for the sector to regain its feet after the 2008 financial crisis when there was better co-ordination among countries.

However, more than four months after the first coronavirus quarantine measures were imposed in China, where the outbreak began, co-ordination has been slow internationally and even within individual countries. In the US, Texas began easing its 14-day quarantine rules for out-of-state visitors as early as April but similar restrictions were still in place last week in states such as Alaska.

The disparity is especially acute in Europe, where countries including Italy, Spain and Greece are planning to loosen their quarantine requirements as summer nears — just as the UK, one of the region’s largest economies, introduces them.

Travellers respect social distancing as they wait for saliva sample results in a coronavirus testing facility at the AsiaWorld-Expo in Hong Kong © Laurel Chor/Bloomberg

The UK has bucked international trends throughout the pandemic by failing to impose the quarantine rules, airport testing or tighter border controls that other nations introduced. To the fury of British airlines and hotels, it has now decided that from June 8, arrivals from abroad will have to self-isolate for 14 days or face a £1,000 fine.

There will be exemptions for freight drivers, doctors and others. But the step is “the very last thing the travel industry needs”, according to a letter to the government endorsed by more than 200 travel and hospitality companies. The “unworkable” move would deter foreign visitors and probably spur reciprocal quarantine requirements on British travellers, they said.

Boris Johnson, the prime minister, has said the government did not bring in quarantine earlier because “the scientific advice was very clear that it would make no difference” to the arrival of the epidemic. It was acting now, as infection rates were falling, because it did not want to see a wave of reinfection from abroad, he said.

One scientist who has attended the UK government’s scientific advisory group on emergencies, or Sage, told the FT in April that quarantine would have been economically disastrous for an island nation supplied by thousands of Channel-crossing lorries each day.

This is not the first time Britain has stood out on such matters.

The World Health Organisation was created in 1948 in the wake of a series of 19th-century “international sanitary conferences”. These wrestled with the need to agree on quarantine procedures to stop the spread of diseases, such as cholera, without unduly disrupting international trade.

At the first conference, convened by France in 1851, “maritime nations, notably Britain, wanted to minimise any health regulations that would interfere with the free flow of trade”, says a paper by Charles Clift, senior consulting fellow at the Chatham House think-tank who has studied the history of global health institutions.

The editor of a German medical journal later noted the “surprising concordance between England’s commercial interests and its scientific convictions”, the paper adds.

A passenger in a decontamination tent after arriving at Ninoy Aquino international airport, Manila © Ezra Acayan/Getty

Economic cost

The struggle to preserve both public and financial health has continued ever since, not least when it comes to the current pandemic.

The World Health Organisation has long been wary of curbing the movement of people or goods in a public health emergency, in part because it says such restrictions are often ineffective and can have negative economic effects.

Asked last week if this was still the case, a spokesman pointed to written WHO advice saying travel measures that significantly interfere with international traffic for more than 24 hours “may have a public health rationale at the beginning of the containment phase of an outbreak”, as they can buy time for countries to prepare.

“Such restrictions, however, need to be short in duration, proportionate to the public health risks, and be reconsidered regularly as the situation evolves,” it said.

So why have so many countries ignored this? One possible answer: panic. Covid-19 spread at a much faster rate than most countries expected. The sight of overwhelmed hospitals in developed countries such as Italy may have jolted governments into action.

In many countries, the public welcomed the move. Quarantine has been part of a suite of travel restrictions credited with keeping death rates low in countries such as New Zealand and Australia, which had recorded fewer than 130 Covid-19 deaths between them at the time of writing.

Travellers from Wuhan gather to take buses as they are taken to do 14 days of quarantine after arriving in Beijing  © Kevin Frayer/Getty

At one point, more than two-thirds of Australia’s confirmed Covid-19 cases were returning travellers, according to Brendan Murphy, the country’s chief medical officer. More than 33,800 people have been quarantined in the country since both national and internal state borders began to close in March, mostly in hotels with governments footing the bill.

Things have not always run smoothly. In Perth, a man was jailed after repeatedly sneaking out of his quarantine hotel room. A 70-year-old man in the same city ended up in intensive care after falling ill in hotel quarantine where his wife’s pleas for medical help at first went unanswered.

In New Zealand, anguished relatives have gone to court to overturn quarantine rules that stopped them seeing dying family members.

But the countries’ success in stemming the virus shows that measures such as quarantine work, says Dr Bharat Pankhania, senior clinical lecturer at the University of Exeter’s college of medicine and health.

“It worked. What more do you want?” he told the FT. The UK’s larger population and arrival numbers might have made quarantine harder but not impossible, he added. “Because that was seen as a tall order, they said, ‘can’t be done’. Anything is possible if you want to do it.”

Istanbul airport. Turkey has recently restarted a limited number of domestic flights © Chris McGrath/Getty

An era of travel bubbles?

Some countries have begun to ease their quarantine measures, but for financially stricken airlines the policy has been a source of contention from the start of the pandemic.

“We are concerned about the deployment of such measures of quarantine because it is a major deterrent to air travel,” says Alexandre de Juniac, director-general of the International Air Transport Association.

Instead of quarantine, aviation and tourism companies are pushing for common international standards on how to manage travel, including temperature checks at airports, wearing face masks during transit, social distancing where possible at the airport and increased cleaning of equipment.

The travel industry is also backing quarantine-free “air bridges”, “bubbles” or “travel corridors” set up between countries with low infection rates. Australia and New Zealand have agreed to establish a “Trans-Tasman travel bubble”, while countries including Israel, Greece and Cyprus have discussed a tourism safe zone in the eastern Mediterranean.

John Holland-Kaye, chief executive of London’s Heathrow airport, where average passenger numbers have fallen from about 250,000 a day to almost 6,000, says there are other factors to consider.

“There is no perfect way currently to say that one person has the disease and another one doesn’t, but we can say one country is low-risk and, therefore, we should accept passengers coming in from there. And, reciprocally, they will accept passengers from us if we are seen as low risk,” he told the FT.

“It seems exactly the right kind of approach rather than a blanket 14-day quarantine to any arriving passenger which will stop people flying and hold back the economy,” he said.

Heathrow airport, London. Aviation and tourism companies are pushing for international standards, eg wearing face masks during transit, as an alternative to tougher quarantine measures © Tolga Akmen/AFP/Getty

Heathrow is working with 10 other major hub airports around the world, including Hong Kong, Sydney and San Francisco, to try to establish the same health measures globally, as a way of fast tracking the “air bridge” idea. However, this is ultimately a decision for governments.

Meanwhile, anyone hoping to see an end to quarantine soon cannot ignore the country where the coronavirus outbreak began: China.

It is now more than four months since Wuhan, the city where the virus was first detected, was cordoned off. Mass quarantine later enveloped the entire province of Hubei and its 60m people. Measures were later adopted to safeguard Beijing from exposure to the virus, keeping the capital’s total number of infections to about 500.

How quarantine rules differ across the world

United Kingdom From June 8, residents and visitors will be required to spend 14 days self-isolating in one place, or face a £1,000 fine. People will also be asked to provide contact details and may be fined £100 if they refuse.

Hong Kong On arrival, passengers without symptoms must be tested for Covid-19 and then await the results. People with negative results may be able to leave and go home for 14 days of compulsory quarantine, during which they must check their temperature twice daily and record their health conditions.

Austria Non-citizens coming in by land from neighbouring countries must present a health certificate no more than four days old that confirms a negative test result for the virus. Citizens returning home must undergo a 14-day home quarantine and if a test done during this time is negative, the quarantine can be ended.

Indonesia Arrivals must show a health certificate confirming a negative Covid-19 result from a test taken no more than seven days before arrival. Those who arrive without such a certificate are required to undergo a test and quarantine on arrival, at their own expense, until the test results are received, which can take up to seven days.

Ireland Arrivals from abroad, including returning Irish citizens, must stay indoors and avoid contact with other people for 14 days.

While foreign arrivals to China have drawn to a trickle, internal travellers have been subject to strict but inconsistent quarantine rules.

When Wuhan reopened to travel on April 8, those heading to Beijing found the trip more difficult than advertised. Arrivals were greeted by local officials in hazmat suits who bussed them directly from the train station to their home or government facility.

Some districts allowed returnees to quarantine at home with relatively few restrictions; in some cases a note promising not to set foot outside sufficed. In other districts, officials taped shut the returnees’ doors and put a sensor device outside the door that would alert authorities if it was opened.

Some areas of Beijing refused all residents returning from Wuhan, barred them from going to their homes and forced them to proceed directly to a government facility for a 14-day stint.

Editor’s note

The Financial Times is making key coronavirus coverage free to read to help everyone stay informed. Find the latest here.

Regulations in Beijing have eased in recent weeks. However, in northern China, where a cluster of cases was recently discovered, large cities such as Harbin in Heilongjiang have been locked down and quarantine measures enforced.

Even in the country that first experienced Covid-19 and took some of the most radical steps to quash it, life is still not entirely as it was.

With prospects of a vaccine or proven treatment still unknown, that may remain the case around the world for quite a while to come.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiP2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZ0LmNvbS9jb250ZW50LzRkMGMwNGE2LWFiMTItNGUyZS1iZGMzLTJhZjVmYTRlMTJkN9IBAA?oc=5

2020-06-02 11:11:05Z
CAIiELp1Ibsdg0FCGoen7V6WTgQqGAgEKg8IACoHCAow-4fWBzD4z0gw_fCpBg

Air bridges WILL be brought in within weeks to save the airline industry - Daily Mail

PM 'will bring in air bridges' to low-infection countries like Australia and Greece to head off huge Tory revolt over 14-day quarantine on UK arrivals - with curbs branded 'pointless' because people can pop out for food and only a fifth face spot checks

  • The air bridges plan will allow people to travel between UK and certain nations
  • It is expected to be put in place from June 29, boosting summer holiday hopes 
  • From Monday, anyone arriving in Britain will have to self-isolate for a fortnight 

Boris Johnson is backing air bridges to low-infection countries as the government scrambles to head off a huge Tory revolt over 14-day quarantine on UK arrivals, it was claimed today. 

The PM is desperately trying to find a way of defusing the row amid warnings that the edict on self-isolation will 'kill' the travel industry.

Underlining the threat aviation already faces from lockdown, it has emerged that just 23 people used Gatwick Airport in an entire day last week - down from its pre-covid average of 45,000. 

MPs have also branded the curbs 'ridiculous' and 'pointless' after it emerged people will be allowed to pop out for food, only a fifth face spot checks, and officials will not be allowed to enter their homes. 

The detail of the proposals is expected to be laid in Parliament by Home Secretary Priti Patel later, although there might well not be a vote.

The rules are due to take effect on Monday, but a there are growing signs the measures will be scaled back again when they are reviewed in three weeks. 

The air bridges plan, championed by Transport Secretary Grant Shapps, could see restrictions eased on countries like Australia and Greece with low levels of coronavirus. It offers some hopes of summer holidays for Britons as the nation struggles to get back to normal after months of lockdown. 

Ministers are expected to use a five-point assessment to judge which countries could be prioritised for the agreements. 

The criteria could include the economic and cultural ties to the UK, the infection rate and the level of health screening at departure airports.  

A country's R rate of infection is likely to be the key factor in whether an air bridge agreement is considered.   

Just 23 people used Gatwick Airport in an entire day last week - down from its pre-covid average of 45,000

Just 23 people used Gatwick Airport in an entire day last week - down from its pre-covid average of 45,000

The news comes as MPs urged the government to rethink the 14-day quarantine to avoid killing off the airline industry.    

Tory MP Henry Smith, whose Crawley constituency covers Gatwick, said low passengers at the airport last week highlighted the scale of the problem.   

He said: 'It's well-intentioned but it hasn't been thought through.

'It sounds good, to stop people at the borders so we don't get re-infections of Covid-19. But I don't think it is going to be a benefit to public health and will prolong the economic damage.'

Travel industry experts say quarantine,will cost Britain's tourism sector as much as £15billion if it is maintained throughout the summer.

Under the plans, people arriving in the UK from Britain, including citizens returning from abroad, will have to self-isolate for two weeks. 

There are exemptions for groups including lorry drivers, health workers and scientists. 

Spot checks will be carried out on addresses and fines of £1,000 could be imposed on people breaking the rules.

But according to the Guardian, only a fifth of arrivals will be subject to spot checks. 

People will be able to give more than one address where they will be self-isolating - and will also be allowed to go out to buy food – including for pets – or medicine.

'To get caught, you will either have to be unlucky or stupid,' one source said.  

Like the wider lockdown measures, the plans will be reviewed every three weeks.

Former transport minister Stephen Hammond asked what the point of the quarantine was when it could be dodged relatively easily.

The Tory MP told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that air bridges would be a 'sensible, targeted response' between low-risk countries.

'I think the idea of air bridges are the right way forward,' he added.

'I think, as we've seen across the world, people are taking measures out of the lockdown and this targeted approach would be a much more sensible way to behave.'

The air bridges idea was first floated by Mr Shapps last month, before being played down by No10 sources.

However, sources told the Telegraph that Mr Johnson is now 'personally in favour' of the plan. 

Priti Patel, the home secretary, is thought to remain sceptical. 

Travel companies are offering up to 65 per cent off summer holidays – but tourism experts are warning Britons the trips may not end up going ahead.

The bargain packages are being advertised on booking sites for as early as July in a bid to salvage the season.

It came as last night the holiday dreams of millions of Britons were given a boost after Portugal and Greece said they were ready to welcome back UK tourists within days.

Tui, Britain's biggest tour operator, is cutting three nights all-inclusive at the TUI SUNEO Odessos in Bulgaria on July 10 from £543 per person to £296. And a seven-night trip to Gran Canaria on July 6 has been slashed from £606 to £394.

Travel Zoo is offering two nights in Paris in September for £79 – up to 64 per cent cheaper than usual.

And easyJet Holidays is selling a week-long stay at Anseli Hotel in Rhodes from July 8 for £195 with flights and transfers.

But experts have warned desperate Britons to hold off booking for now.

The Foreign Office still advises against all but essential travel and there will be a two-week quarantine for returning holidaymakers from June 8.

Rory Boland, editor of Which? Travel, said: 'If consumers are keen to book something now they should go into it with their eyes open.

'If the FCO advice is still in place when their holiday is due to take place, they will get a refund, but there's a good chance they will be waiting a long time.

'Holiday providers need to make it clear to their customers that these holidays may not take place.'

The UK quarantine will be reviewed every three weeks. TUI spokesman Liz Edwards said they hope it will be lifted on June 29 in time for summer trips.

She added: 'We believe we will be having summer holidays this year, hopefully from July. We hope the quarantine will be lifted, but air bridges are certainly a possibility.

'Bookings have been really picking up. Spain, Greece, Cyprus are likely to open up first. The Canaries and Balearics are keen to welcome back tourists.'

Airlines are also heavily discounting flights. A Heathrow to Cancun return with Air France in September, which usually sells for around £800, is being advertised for £312.

And return flights from Manchester to Reykjavik with easyJet in November are being sold for £41 (usually £150 plus), and Manchester to Dubrovnik with Jet2 from £30 one-way in late June (usually around £120).

Emma Coulthurst, from TravelSupermarket, said: 'The 14-day quarantine measure makes holidays pretty impractical, although I have heard of some people willing to do it to get a holiday. There is a risk booking now as there is no guarantee the holiday will go ahead.'

Research by TUI revealed the most popular destinations for trips this year are Spain, Greece and Italy followed by Florida and the Caribbean.

And those hoping to go to Greece or Portugal this summer could still get the chance.

Officials in Lisbon believe Britain has coronavirus 'under control' and want quarantine-free travel between the two countries to restart from this Saturday.

Greece's tourism minister Harry Theocharis told the Mail the epidemic was moving 'in the right direction' in the UK and restrictions could be dropped for Britons from June 15.

The interventions increased pressure on Downing Street to re-think its plan for a 'blanket' 14-day quarantine amid a growing backlash from MPs at being denied a vote on the measures.

Ms Patel will today introduce the regulations in Parliament to come into effect from next Monday.

But they will be brought as a statutory instrument, which does not automatically go to a vote. Tory MPs are expecting the government to give a strong signal on air bridges to head off an outright rebellion.

Home Secretary Priti Patel (pictured) will today introduce the regulations in Parliament to come into effect from next Monday

Home Secretary Priti Patel (pictured) will today introduce the regulations in Parliament to come into effect from next Monday

Under the plans, anyone entering the country by plane, train or boat will have to go into quarantine for two weeks.

This will apply to foreign tourists as well as Britons returning from abroad.

However, some people, including medical professionals and lorry drivers, will be exempt.

MPs among a cross-party group of at least 40 who are critical of the plans last night voiced their fury.

They want the Government to leave open the option of creating 'air bridges' – which would allow tourists between two countries to visit without needing to quarantine – to salvage as much of the summer holiday season as possible and help keep the hard-hit tourism industry afloat.

They say, instead of quarantine, arrivals to the UK could be subject to health checks or testing.

Industry chiefs say millions of Britons are desperate for a foreign getaway, but the blanket quarantine policy has all but cancelled summer holidays.

Former Cabinet minister David Davis said: 'Parliament should be properly involved and quite plainly it is not. In this particular case, its very blanket policy could reasonably be amended in a number of ways. 

'For example, our death rate is many, many times than that in Greece. So the idea of quarantining someone coming from Greece who would have a much lower risk of suffering from the disease than someone anywhere else in Britain is plainly not supported by any sort of science.

'The idea of putting in air bridges might be a sensible amendment.'

Former environment secretary Theresa Villiers said: 'I would very much prefer the quarantine rules be targeted on flights from Covid hotspots.

'I appreciate why the Government is bringing in quarantine but I do think that applying it in a blanket way across the board is an over-reaction.'

Sir Graham Brady, chairman of the influential 1922 Committee of Tory backbenchers, said: 'I hope the Government will move swiftly to introduce air bridges and also to introduce a testing regime at airports as quickly as possible.'

Downing Street last night insisted it still intended to push ahead with the policy.

It has stressed quarantine will be reviewed every three weeks and has left open the possibility of striking air bridge deals in future.

But the first review period would not be until June 29. 

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiZWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmRhaWx5bWFpbC5jby51ay9uZXdzL2FydGljbGUtODM3ODUyOS9BaXItYnJpZGdlcy1icm91Z2h0LXdlZWtzLXNhdmUtYWlybGluZS1pbmR1c3RyeS5odG1s0gFpaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZGFpbHltYWlsLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvYXJ0aWNsZS04Mzc4NTI5L2FtcC9BaXItYnJpZGdlcy1icm91Z2h0LXdlZWtzLXNhdmUtYWlybGluZS1pbmR1c3RyeS5odG1s?oc=5

2020-06-02 10:46:41Z
CAIiEBVI0mQJqjG3lMU1CrMRHAgqGQgEKhAIACoHCAowzuOICzCZ4ocDMKiaowY