Jumat, 01 Mei 2020

Coronavirus: No 10 says face coverings have 'weak but positive effect' in slowing COVID-19 - Sky News

There is evidence face coverings have a "weak but positive effect" in reducing transmission of the coronavirus, Downing Street has said.

A spokesman for Prime Minister Boris Johnson said ministers are still considering what guidance to issue to the public during the COVID-19 lockdown.

Experts have argued coverings are unlikely to prevent someone contracting the coronavirus, but say it may reduce the number of infected people who are not showing symptoms from spreading the virus.

Boris Johnson suggests that the government are looking at the usefulness of face masks
'I do think that face coverings will be useful'

"Ministers are still considering how we move forward with face coverings in terms of the precise advice which we give to the public and once that's ready we will announce it," he said.

"The advice we have received based on the science shows a weak but positive effect in reducing transmission of coronavirus from asymptomatic members of the public where social distancing isn't possible.

"What ministers need to consider is how best to produce advice for the public on the next steps and that work is still ongoing."

It comes after the PM said face coverings will be "useful" when lockdown restrictions are eased to "give people confidence they can go back to work".

More from Covid-19

On Thursday, Mr Johnson said: "What I think SAGE [the government's scientific advisory group] is saying, what I certainly agree with, is that as part of coming out of the lockdown, I do think face coverings will be useful.

"Both for epidemiological reasons but, also, for giving people confidence that they can go back to work.

"You're going to be hearing more about that and that kind of thing next week."

How good are masks at stopping virus spread?

It is understood that ministers are not considering recommending people use medical-quality masks, which could divert supplies away from the NHS.

What kind of materials are advisable to use for such coverings is one of the issues the government is considering.

On Tuesday, the Scottish government issued new advice saying that people should wear face coverings in shops and on public transport.

First Minister Nicola Sturgeon did not make their use mandatory, conceding the evidence over their use is "still limited".

EDINBURGH, SCOTLAND - APRIL 17: Members of the public wear masks as the walk near the Mound during the coronavirus pandemic  on April 17, 2020 in Edinburgh, Scotland. The Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has spread to many countries across the world, claiming over 120,000 lives and infecting over 2 million people. (Photo by Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images)
Scotland endorses COVID-19 face coverings

But she said there were benefits in wearing coverings to reduce transmission from individuals who are not yet displaying symptoms.

Asked that same day whether the recommendation was likely to be adopted across the UK, Health Secretary Matt Hancock said the government's position had not changed and that there was "weak science" supporting the advice.

Professor Angela McLean, the deputy chief scientific adviser, said SAGE had recommended that there is "weak evidence of a small effect" that wearing a mask can stop an infected person spreading the disease.

She told Tuesday's COVID-19 news conference: "The answer is clear that the evidence is weak and the effect is small, and we have passed that on to our colleagues in government with which to make a decision."

:: Listen to the Daily podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker

Cabinet Office minister Michael Gove has also suggested there may be a danger that people would act in a "cavalier" way if told to wear masks.

"The scientific evidence so far says face coverings can have an effect in preventing an individual from spreading the disease to others if they have it and are asymptomatic," he told MPs on Wednesday.

"But there is also a worry that some people may think that wearing a mask protects themselves, as distinct to protecting others, and therefore they may behave in a manner that is slightly more cavalier."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMifWh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2Nvcm9uYXZpcnVzLW5vLTEwLWFkbWl0cy1mYWNlLWNvdmVyaW5ncy1oYXZlLXdlYWstYnV0LXBvc2l0aXZlLWVmZmVjdC1pbi1zbG93aW5nLWNvdmlkLTE5LTExOTgxNzcz0gGBAWh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2FtcC9jb3JvbmF2aXJ1cy1uby0xMC1hZG1pdHMtZmFjZS1jb3ZlcmluZ3MtaGF2ZS13ZWFrLWJ1dC1wb3NpdGl2ZS1lZmZlY3QtaW4tc2xvd2luZy1jb3ZpZC0xOS0xMTk4MTc3Mw?oc=5

2020-05-01 12:21:01Z
52780757781049

Coronavirus UK: Interactive map shows fatalities by postcode - Daily Mail

How many people have died of coronavirus in your area? Interactive map reveals fatalities by postcode - and reveals deaths are TWICE as high in poor areas of England and Wales

  • Most deprived areas suffered 55 coronavirus deaths per 100,000 people compared to 25 in richest areas 
  • Boroughs in London account for all of the top ten worst-hit local authorities, with Newham and Brent worst-hit
  • Hastings, in affluent East Sussex, and Norwich had lowest COVID-19 death rates with less than 10 per 100,000
  • Here’s how to help people impacted by Covid-19
Advertisement

An interactive map which reveals coronavirus deaths by postcode shows that people living in the poorest parts of England and Wales are dying at more than double the rate of those in affluent areas. 

The map, included in the latest Office for National Statistics report, found the most deprived regions suffered 55 deaths per 100,000 people, compared with 25 fatalities per 100,000 in the wealthiest areas.

London, the epicentre of Britain's outbreak, had the highest mortality rate, with 85.7 deaths per 100,000 people - more than double the national average of 36.2 fatalities. One in four of all coronavirus victims live in the capital.

The London boroughs of Newham, Brent and Hackney were the three worst-hit regions in all of the country, suffering 144, 142 and 127 deaths per 100,000, respectively. 

Boroughs in the capital accounted for all of the top ten local authorities with the highest COVID-19 death rates, the report showed.

Hastings, in affluent East Sussex, and Norwich had the lowest COVID-19 death rates – suffering six and five deaths per 100,000, respectively. 

Ethnic minority groups - who are most vulnerable to COVID-19 - make up the majority of residents in Newham (71 per cent) and Brent (64 per cent).  

Whereas the overwhelming majority of residents in Hastings and Norwich are white, with just 9 per cent and 6 per cent coming from minority backgrounds.

A separate report by the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) released today found black and Asian Britons are two-and-a-half times more likely to die from COVID-19 than whites.  

The interactive map breaks down the number of COVID-19 deaths by so-called 'Middle Layer Super Output Areas' (MSOAs) which have an average population of 7,5000. The ONS uses MSOAs to get a more accurate local breakdown of statistics. Some MSOAs may include more than one postcode

Death rates from all causes are higher in poorer areas, the ONS said, but the pandemic appears to be pushing the rates even higher

 Death rates from all causes are higher in poorer areas, the ONS said, but the pandemic appears to be pushing the rates even higher

Boroughs in London accounted for all of the top ten worst hit local authorities, the report showed

Boroughs in London accounted for all of the top ten worst hit local authorities, the report showed

In other coronavirus developments today: 

  • Sixty per cent of Brits would be uncomfortable going out - even if it's safe - as ministers are warned 'stay at home' message has been 'too successful
  • Ministers warn lockdown could stay for MONTHS until new cases drop to the hundreds - as Professor Chris Whitty says a second peak could be worse than the first and eradicating coronavirus is 'technically impossible' 
  • Death rate among black and Asian Brits is more than 2.5 TIMES higher than that of the white population, reveals stark analysis by Institute of Fiscal Studies
  • Ryanair vows to refund 25million customers in six months as the airline slashes 3,000 jobs - while Heathrow sees 97 per cent drop in passengers in last month  
  • Older TV stars have been banned from working on Emmerdale and Coronation Street when they get back up and running

Experts say those living in poverty smoke and drink alcohol more, and are more likely to be obese - all of which increase the likelihood of chronic health conditions.

Patients with pre-existing health troubles struggle to fight off COVID-19 before it becomes life threatening. 

And poor people are also more likely to use public transport more often and live in crowded houses - driving up their chance of catching and spreading the virus.   

The second worst-hit area behind London was the West Midlands, where the death rate is 43.2 per 100,000.  The report analysed 20,283 virus deaths registered in England and Wales from March 1 to April 17.

It also found the fatality rate is six times higher among those living in major cities than in rural areas.  No rural area had a death rate higher than 21.9.

The report found the fatality rate was higher among men in the most deprived areas (76.7 deaths per 100,000 population) than it is for women (39.6).

London , the heart of Britain's outbreak, had the highest mortality rate, with 85.7 deaths per 100,000 people - more than double the national average of 36.2 fatalities. The second worst-hit area was the West Midlands, where the death rate is 43.2 per 100,000, closely followed by the North West (40)

London , the heart of Britain's outbreak, had the highest mortality rate, with 85.7 deaths per 100,000 people - more than double the national average of 36.2 fatalities. The second worst-hit area was the West Midlands, where the death rate is 43.2 per 100,000, closely followed by the North West (40)

The report analysed 20,283 virus deaths registered in England and Wales from March 1 to April 17. It also found the fatality rate is six times higher among those living in major cities than in rural areas. No rural area had a death rate higher than 21.9

The report analysed 20,283 virus deaths registered in England and Wales from March 1 to April 17. It also found the fatality rate is six times higher among those living in major cities than in rural areas. No rural area had a death rate higher than 21.9

TEN AREAS WITH THE HIGHEST COVID-19 DEATH RATE (PER 100,000 PEOPLE)

  1. Newham – 144.3 
  2. Brent – 141.5
  3. Hackney – 127.4
  4. Tower Hamlets – 122.9
  5. Haringey – 119.3
  6. Harrow – 114.7
  7. Southwark – 108.1
  8. Lewisham – 106.4
  9. Lambeth – 104.3
  10. Ealing 103.2  

...AND WHAT % OF THE POPULATION ARE ETHNIC MINORITIES?

Newham – 71%

Brent – 63.7%

Hackney – 45.5%

Tower Hamlets – 54.9%

Haringey – 39.6%

Harrow – 57.8%

Southwark – 45.9%

Lewisham – 46.5%

Lambeth – 43%

Ealing - 51.1%

In Wales, the most deprived regions suffered 44.6 coronavirus deaths per 100,000 population - nearly double the least deprived areas (23.2 deaths).

Death rates from all causes are higher in poorer areas, the ONS said, but the pandemic appears to be pushing the rates even higher.    

Nick Stripe, Head of Health Analysis, Office for National Statistics, said: 'People living in more deprived areas have experienced COVID-19 mortality rates more than double those living in less deprived areas. 

'In contrast, the region with the lowest proportion of COVID-19 deaths was the South West, which saw just over 1 in 10 deaths involving coronavirus. 

'The 11 local authorities with the highest mortality rates were all London boroughs, with Newham, Brent and Hackney suffering the highest rates of COVID-19 related deaths.

TEN AREAS WITH THE LOWEST COVID-19 DEATH RATE (PER 100,000 PEOPLE)

  1. Norwich - 4.9
  2. Hastings - 6.3
  3. Grimsby - 8
  4. Stockton-on-Tees - 8.9
  5. Scunthorpe - 10.5
  6. Plymouth - 10.6 
  7. Weston-super-Mare - 11
  8. Lincoln - 11.3
  9. Worthing - 12.1
  10. Bournemouth - 13.2  

...AND WHAT % OF THE POPULATION ARE ETHNIC MINORITIES?

Norwich – 9.3%

Hastings - 6.4%

Grimsby – 2.6%

Stockton-on-Tees – 5.5%

Scunthorpe – 4.1%

Plymouth – 3.9%

Weston-super-Mare – 5.5%

Lincoln – 3.4%

Worthing – 6.3%

'People living in more deprived areas have experienced COVID-19 mortality rates more than double those living in less deprived areas. 

'General mortality rates are normally higher in more deprived areas, but so far COVID-19 appears to be taking them higher still.'

It comes after an Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) report found the death rate among Black African Britons was three times that of the white British population.

An Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) report found the death rate among Black African Britons was three times that of the white British population.

The IFS said there was 'unlikely' to be a single explanation for the higher fatalities, but noted that minorities were more likely to be key workers. 

Of all working-age Black Africans, a third are employed in these roles – 50 per cent more than the white British population, according to the think-tank.

Meanwhile Pakistani, Indian and Black African men are 90 per cent, 150 per cent and 310 per cent -more likely to work in healthcare than white British men, respectively.

Hospital workers are vulnerable to the virus because they are repeatedly exposed to higher doses of the bug than the general public.

The IFS adds that two-thirds of Bangladeshi men over the age of 60 have a long-term health condition that would put them at particular risk from infection.

Another possible factor behind disproportionately high death rates could be underlying health problems, the report said.

Wwo-thirds of Bangladeshi men over aged 60 have a long-term condition that would put them at particular risk from infection.

Ross Warwick, a research economist at IFS and co-author of the report, said: 'When you account for the fact that most minority groups are relatively young overall, the number of deaths looks disproportionate in most ethnic minority groups.

'There is unlikely to be a single explanation here and different factors may be more important for different groups.

'For instance, while black Africans are particularly likely to be employed in key worker roles which might put them at risk, older Bangladeshis appear vulnerable on the basis of underlying health conditions.'

Professor Tim Cook, honorary professor in anaesthesia at the University of Bristol, said: 'The disproportionately high number of BAME health and social care workers dying from Covid-19 is striking, so I welcome news that NHS England has recommended these individuals to be identified as potentially at greater risk.

'Our analysis showed 60 per cent of healthcare workers who have died from coronavirus were BAME individuals.' 

Far higher numbers of people from black and Asian backgrounds have died from COVID-19 per 100,000 people than white Britons, despite making up much less of the overall population. 'Other whites' include Gypsy and Irish Travellers, and 'other ethnic group' includes Arabs

Far higher numbers of people from black and Asian backgrounds have died from COVID-19 per 100,000 people than white Britons, despite making up much less of the overall population. 'Other whites' include Gypsy and Irish Travellers, and 'other ethnic group' includes Arabs

The IFS report found Pakistani, Indian and black African men are respectively 90 per cent, 150 per cent and 310 per cent more likely to work in healthcare than white British men

The IFS report found Pakistani, Indian and black African men are respectively 90 per cent, 150 per cent and 310 per cent more likely to work in healthcare than white British men 

Why are so many coronavirus victims from ethnic minorities?

Experts say there is unlikely to be one sole reason as to why ethnic minorities are being killed by the virus. 

They could also be more at risk because of their professions, according to Shaomeng Jia, an economics professor at Alabama State University’s College of Business Administration. 

Those working in retail, in supermarkets and in construction - who cannot work from home - were still mingling and risking infection even when the outbreak peaked, she said. 

Meanwhile, health care jobs, including NHS workers and care home staff are exposed to bigger loads of the virus more often, according to Ross Warwick, a research economist at IFS.

Members of ethnic minority communities are twice as likely to be affected by poverty, and are often hit the hardest by chronic diseases.

Those living in poverty smoke and drink alcohol more and are more likely to be obese - all of which increase the likelihood of chronic health conditions.

Patients with pre-existing health troubles struggle to fight off COVID-19 before it causes deadly complications such as pneumonia. 

Impoverished people are also more likely to use public transport more often and live in crowded houses - driving up their chance of catching and spreading the virus.   

The Royal College of Surgeons has said NHS workers from black or ethnic minority groups should be removed from the frontline as more evidence points to them being more vulnerable to the virus.

It comes after charity Oxfam warned the coronavirus pandemic could push half a billion people globally into poverty.

A report from the Nairobi-based charity last month looked at the impact the crisis will have on global poverty by shrinking household incomes and consumption.

The report found the world would be far worse hit than after the 2008 financial crisis.

It said: 'The estimates show that, regardless of the scenario, global poverty could increase for the first time since 1990.' 

The report added this could mean some countries revert to poverty levels last seen three decades ago.

Report authors explored a number of scenarios to assess how poverty levels could change. 

The most serious scenario would result in a 20% squeeze on incomes. 

It would mean the number of people living in extreme poverty - $1.90 a day or less - would rise by a staggering 434 million, to nearly 1.2 billion people worldwide

Women are at much greater risk than men because they are more likely to work in the informal economy with little or no employment rights.

Under the same scenario, those living in higher poverty, $5.50 or less, would jump by 548 million to almost four billion people. 

The report warned:  'Living day to day, the poorest people do not have the ability to take time off work, or to stockpile provisions.' 

It added that more than two billion informal sector workers worldwide had no access to sick pay.

The World Bank said last week that poverty in East Asia and the Pacific region alone could increase by 11 million people if conditions worsened.

Oxfam has proposed a six point action plan that would deliver cash grants and bailouts to people and businesses in need. 

The charity also called for debt cancellation, more International Monetary Fund support, and increased aid. 

Taxing wealth, extraordinary profits, and speculative financial products would help raise the funds needed, Oxfam added.

Calls for debt relief have increased in recent weeks as the fallout from the Covid-19 pandemic has roiled developing nations around the world.  

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiggFodHRwczovL3d3dy5kYWlseW1haWwuY28udWsvbmV3cy9hcnRpY2xlLTgyNzcyNzMvQ29yb25hdmlydXMtZGVhdGhzLVRXSUNFLWhpZ2gtcG9vci1hcmVhcy1FbmdsYW5kLVdhbGVzLU9mZmljaWFsLWZpZ3VyZXMtc2hvdy5odG1s0gGGAWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmRhaWx5bWFpbC5jby51ay9uZXdzL2FydGljbGUtODI3NzI3My9hbXAvQ29yb25hdmlydXMtZGVhdGhzLVRXSUNFLWhpZ2gtcG9vci1hcmVhcy1FbmdsYW5kLVdhbGVzLU9mZmljaWFsLWZpZ3VyZXMtc2hvdy5odG1s?oc=5

2020-05-01 13:25:34Z
52780758940226

Duchess of Sussex: Mail on Sunday wins first round in Meghan privacy case - BBC News

The Mail on Sunday has won the first round of a legal battle against the Duchess of Sussex over the publication of a letter she wrote to her father.

The duchess is suing for breach of privacy and copyright infringement after articles reproduced parts of a letter she sent Thomas Markle.

The publisher denies the allegations.

On Friday it won its bid to have parts of Meghan's claim struck out. Her lawyers said the ruling did not change "the core elements of this case".

What happened at the ruling?

At a hearing held remotely last week, Associated Newspapers - the publishers of the Mail on Sunday, Daily Mail and MailOnline - asked for parts of Meghan's case to be dismissed.

Judge Mr Justice Warby agreed and on Friday struck out parts of Meghan's claim, including her allegations the publisher acted "dishonestly" by leaving out certain parts of the letter.

He also dismissed Meghan's allegations that the publisher deliberately "dug up" issues between Meghan and her father, and that it had an "agenda" of publishing intrusive or offensive stories about her.

Mr Justice Warby said the allegations he struck out do not go to the "heart of the case", and that they may be brought back at a later stage if they are put on a proper legal basis.

What does the ruling mean?

This is a very good day for Associated Newspapers and a very bad one for the Duchess of Sussex and her legal team.

It is however, an early skirmish in what is looking like a long, expensive and brutal legal battle.

The duchess has had parts of her claim for invasion of privacy struck out. Those parts relate to allegations Associated acted with dishonesty and malice, that it deliberately "stirred up" issues between the duchess and her father, and that it had an agenda to paint her in a false and damaging light.

Actions for breach of privacy do not have to include allegations of this kind.

At trial, the case will turn on whether the duchess had a reasonable expectation that the letter written to her father would remain private and there was no overriding public interest in publishing it.

Many lawyers take the view that a letter written to a relative concerning a family relationship is by definition private, no matter who the author is or what rank they hold.

However, Associated argue that the duchess did not expect the letter to remain private, anticipated that it would be published, and that publication was in the public interest. The battle is far from over.

What is the case about?

Meghan is suing Associated Newspapers over five articles, two in the Mail on Sunday and three on MailOnline, which were published in February 2019.

The articles reproduced parts of a handwritten letter she sent to her father Thomas Markle, six months before in August 2018.

The headline in the Mail on Sunday carried the headline: "Revealed: The letter showing true tragedy of Meghan's rift with a father she says has 'broken her heart into a million pieces'."

Meghan claims the letter was "private and confidential" and "detailed her intimate thoughts and feelings about her father's health and her relationship with him at that time".

She is seeking damages for alleged misuse of private information, copyright infringement and breach of the Data Protection Act.

Associated Newspapers wholly denies the allegations and says it will hotly contest the case.

It argues the Duchess of Sussex had no reasonable expectation of privacy and anticipated publication of the letter.

In January, it filed its defence documents which claimed the duchess was more worried about the "unflattering" effect of the publication of the letter, rather than any breach of her data protection rights.

How has Meghan responded to the ruling?

Lawyers for Schillings, the firm representing Meghan, said the ruling did not change "the core elements of this case".

"The duchess's rights were violated; the legal boundaries around privacy were crossed," a spokesperson said.

They said they respect the judge's decision and "the strong case against Associated will continue to focus on the issue of a private, intimate and handwritten letter from a daughter to her father that was published by the Mail on Sunday".

"This gross violation of any person's right to privacy is obvious and unlawful, and the Mail on Sunday should be held to account for their actions."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiJmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jby51ay9uZXdzL3VrLTUyNTAzMzYz0gEqaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuYmJjLmNvLnVrL25ld3MvYW1wL3VrLTUyNTAzMzYz?oc=5

2020-05-01 11:27:59Z
52780755753278

Meghan loses first High Court fight against Mail On Sunday - Sky News

The Duchess of Sussex has lost the first High Court fight against the publishers of The Mail On Sunday.

The case is focused on the newspaper's publication of a letter that Meghan wrote to her estranged father, Thomas Markle.

In a ruling on Friday, Mr Justice Warby struck out parts of the duchess's claim against the Mail on Sunday's publisher, Associated Newspapers, including allegations that it acted "dishonestly" by leaving out certain passages of the letter.

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex arrive at Mansion House in London to attend the Endeavour Fund Awards. PA Photo. Picture date: Thursday March 5, 2020. See PA story ROYAL Sussex. Photo credit should read: Steve Parsons/PA Wire
Image: The Duke and Duchess of Sussex are understood to have listened online to court hearings held last week

The judge also struck out allegations that the publisher deliberately "stirred up" issues between Meghan and her father, and that it had an "agenda" of publishing intrusive or offensive stories about her.

Mr Justice Warby said those allegations should not form part of her case at this stage, because they were "irrelevant" to her claim for misuse of private information, copyright infringement and breach of the Data Protection Act.

However, he said those parts of her case may be revived at a later stage, if they are put on a proper legal basis.

A spokesman for the Duchess of Sussex said the ruling "makes very clear that the core elements of this case do not change and will continue to move forward".

More from Duchess Of Sussex

He added: "Whilst the judge recognises that there is a claim for breach of privacy and copyright, we are surprised to see that his ruling suggests that dishonest behaviour is not relevant."

Meghan is suing Associated Newspapers over five articles, two in the Mail on Sunday and three on MailOnline, which were published in February 2019.

The articles reproduced parts of a handwritten letter she sent to her father Thomas in August 2018.

Thomas Markle fears he will never see his daughter again
Image: The case is focused on the publication of a letter that Meghan wrote to Thomas Markle

A preliminary hearing, in which lawyers for the publisher asked for parts of the Meghan's case to be struck out, was held last week.

The judge sat at the Royal Courts of Justice in London and lawyers and reporters attended remotely.

It is understood that the Meghan and her husband the Duke of Sussex listened online to the parts of the hearing.

The duchess is seeking damages from Associated Newspapers for alleged misuse of private information, copyright infringement and breach of the Data Protection Act.

Meghan has previously said any damages she may be awarded if she wins her case will be donated to an anti-bullying charity.

Associated Newspapers wholly denies the allegations, particularly the claim that the letter was edited in any way that changed its meaning, and says it will hotly contest the case.

Sections of the letter were published in the newspaper and online in February last year, and it was announced in October that the duchess would be taking legal action.

The headline on the main article read: "Revealed: The letter showing true tragedy of Meghan's rift with a father she says has 'broken her heart into a million pieces'".

No date has been set for any further hearing in the case and it is not known when a full trial of the issues is expected to take place.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiXmh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L21lZ2hhbi1sb3Nlcy1maXJzdC1oaWdoLWNvdXJ0LWZpZ2h0LWFnYWluc3QtbWFpbC1vbi1zdW5kYXktMTE5ODE3MjfSAWJodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9hbXAvbWVnaGFuLWxvc2VzLWZpcnN0LWhpZ2gtY291cnQtZmlnaHQtYWdhaW5zdC1tYWlsLW9uLXN1bmRheS0xMTk4MTcyNw?oc=5

2020-05-01 11:13:53Z
52780755753278

Ryanair to axe up to 3,000 jobs as it warns over slow recovery - Financial Times

Ryanair is preparing to cut up to 15 per cent of its 19,000 workforce as it becomes the latest airline to warn that the aviation industry faces a slow recovery from the upheaval wrought by coronavirus. 

Europe’s largest low-cost carrier said it expected it would take at least two years for a return to last year’s levels of passenger demand and pricing, as it laid out plans to cut further costs. 

Michael O’Leary, Ryanair’s outspoken chief executive, said his outlook on the recovery had changed over the past week in light of the €9bn bailout Air France-KLM had won from the French and Dutch governments, and the state aid Lufthansa is expected to receive.

He said the “whole competitive market has now been completely turned on its head”.

“The weakest airlines going into the crisis — Lufthansa, Air France, KLM, Alitalia — who were going to in normal circumstances have to restructure and retrench are now going to be enormously enriched with this state aid doping. I think what we are facing now is that . . . they’ll be able to make life very difficult for the well-run airlines like ourselves, BA and easyJet.”

Mr O’Leary said Ryanair had to respond by downsizing the airline for the next 12 months. “Unless we have materially lower costs for the next 12-24 months, we won’t be able to operate successfully in a market where air fares are going to be materially lower.”

Ryanair intends to axe as many as 3,000 pilot and cabin crew jobs, and introduce pay cuts of up to 20 per cent as well as close a number of aircraft bases around Europe until air travel recovers. Mr O’Leary will extend his 50 per cent pay cut for the remainder of the financial year to March 2021. 

He said it probably should be considering job cuts of up a third of its workforce, and could not rule out further reductions later, but said it was attempting to preserve jobs.

Ryanair’s comments come as any optimism over a speedy recovery for the industry is evaporating, forcing carriers to move from furloughing workers to making redundancies. 

On Tuesday, British Airways revealed plans to axe almost 30 per cent of its 42,000-strong workforce after its parent company IAG warned that it could take several years to return to 2019 traffic levels. SAS, the Scandinavian airline, said it would permanently cut half — 5,000 — of its staff. 

Ryanair on Friday said it expected to carry no more than 50 per cent of its original traffic target of 44.6m passengers between July and September. For the full year, ending March 2021, it is forecasting fewer than 100m passengers — 35 per cent below its original target of 154m. 

In April, May and June, it expects to carry just 150,000 passengers — 99.5 per cent short of its previous target of 42.4m passengers. 

The carrier said it was also reviewing its growth plans and aircraft orders, adding that it was in “active negotiations” with both Boeing and Laudamotion’s A320 lessors to cut the number of planned aircraft deliveries over the next 24 months. 

The market update comes just a week after Mr O’Leary gave a bullish outlook for a recovery in air travel, outlining plans for the airline to resume 80 per cent of flights by September, provided that flying in Europe could restart from early July. However, he admitted that these planes would have low load factors.

On Friday, Mr O’Leary said there was still a chance Ryanair could reach 2019 traffic volumes by next summer but said it would take until 2022 for 2019 pricing levels to return.

He confirmed Ryanair had also filed a legal complaint to the European Commission over its state aid concerns, and said it would launch legal action by the end of the month.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiP2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZ0LmNvbS9jb250ZW50LzBiMzk1NDcxLTEyYWUtNGJjYS1iNGUxLTRjODc1ZTY3ZjRlNNIBP2h0dHBzOi8vYW1wLmZ0LmNvbS9jb250ZW50LzBiMzk1NDcxLTEyYWUtNGJjYS1iNGUxLTRjODc1ZTY3ZjRlNA?oc=5

2020-05-01 09:37:51Z
52780758797202

Lockdown may stay for months until new cases fall below 1,000 a day as chief medic warns 2nd peak could be - The Sun

THE coronavirus lockdown could stay in place for months until the number of new cases falls below 1,000 a day.

There was a leap in the number of new daily cases to 6,032 from 4,076 and ministers want this figure to be in the hundreds before easing any lockdown measures.

⚠️ Read our coronavirus live blog for the latest news & updates

 Britain's coronavirus lockdown could last months - as Professor Chris Whitty warned a second peak could be worse than the first

5

Britain's coronavirus lockdown could last months - as Professor Chris Whitty warned a second peak could be worse than the firstCredit: London News Pictures
 Ministers want the coronavirus daily case rate to be below 1,000 before easing lockdown measures

5

Ministers want the coronavirus daily case rate to be below 1,000 before easing lockdown measuresCredit: PA:Press Association

5

According to the Daily Telegraph, some ministers were concerned after seeing Germany’s infection rate increase after easing its lockdown.

Chief Medical Officer Chris Whitty also hinted a second peak could be worse than the first as the UK death toll topped 26,000.

He also said the eradication of coronavirus is "technically impossible".

Prof Whitty warned a video conference hosted by Gresham College: "Covid-19 is a very long way from finished and eradication is technically impossible for this disease."

The total number of cases in the UK has topped 171,000 and Britain has not experienced a three-figure case rise since March 23.

SECOND PEAK?

It comes after Boris Johnson last night declared the UK has passed its coronavirus peak - as he promised to unveil a masterplan to exit lockdown next week.

The PM’s three-pronged blueprint will reveal how the economy can be restarted, children will be able to return to school and people can travel to work again safely.

Mr Johnson insisted the virus is still too widespread for any relaxation of the tough restrictions, declaring that “dates and times will very much depend on the data”.

And last night, he joined in the Clap for Carers from outside No10. He also:

The latest data yesterday revealed new cases have more than halved since the numeric peak on Good Friday, and the new daily death toll of 674 has also halved since then.

While the toll stands at 26,771, it was still well below the worst-case scenario of 500,000, the PM argued.

The PM also insisted the key to when the lockdown will end will be what effect actions have on the rate of the virus’s transmission — known as R, for reproduction.

It is entirely plausible for a second wave to actually be more severe than the first if it is not mitigated.

Prof Chris Whitty

Prof Whitty echoed Mr Johnson’s statement on the R rate – currently between 0.6 and 0.9 – and said we need to keep it below one to ensure we don’t get another killer outbreak.

He said: “We need to make sure that R does not go back above one. Because if not we will go back to a second wave.

“It is entirely plausible for a second wave to actually be more severe than the first if it is not mitigated.”

He added: “It’s not just in Game of Thrones that winter is always coming...
“The winter is always worse than summer, spring and autumn for health services.”

Give now to The Sun's NHS appeal

BRITAIN’s four million NHS staff are on the frontline in the battle against coronavirus.

But while they are helping save lives, who is there to help them?

The Sun has launched an appeal to raise £1MILLION for NHS workers. The Who Cares Wins Appeal aims to get vital support to staff in their hour of need.

We have teamed up with NHS Charities Together in their urgent Covid-19 Appeal to ensure the money gets to exactly who needs it.

The Sun is donating £50,000 and we would like YOU to help us raise a million pounds, to help THEM. No matter how little you can spare, please donate today here: www.thesun.co.uk/whocareswinsappeal.

Mr Johnson said yesterday: “I can confirm today for the first time that we are past the peak of this disease, and on the downward slope.

“Or rather, we’ve come under what could have been a vast peak, as though we’ve been going through some huge alpine tunnel and we can now see the sunlight and pasture ahead of us.”

“It is vital that we do not now lose control and run slap into a second and even bigger mountain.”

Calling for another huge heave of “collective discipline”, the PM said: “I know we can do it, because we did it, we’ve shown we can do it, in phase one of this disease.

“This country came together in a way few of us have seen in our lifetimes.”

Covid-19’s R rate was at three when the lockdown was ordered on March 23.

If R is higher than one, it means any infected person will pass on the virus to more than one other — and the bug could spread rapidly again in a fresh outbreak.

But if R can be kept under one, the disease should eventually fade away as not enough new people are infected to sustain it.

 Chief Medical Officer Chris Whitty, right, warned a second peak could be worse

5

Chief Medical Officer Chris Whitty, right, warned a second peak could be worseCredit: PA:Press Association
 The PM’s three-pronged blueprint will reveal how the economy can be restarted

5

The PM’s three-pronged blueprint will reveal how the economy can be restartedCredit: crown copyright

CORONAVIRUS CRISIS - STAY IN THE KNOW

Don't miss the latest news and figures - and essential advice for you and your family.

To receive The Sun's Coronavirus newsletter in your inbox every tea time, sign up here.
To follow us on Facebook, simply 'Like' our Coronavirus page.

Get Britain's best-selling newspaper delivered to your smartphone or tablet each day - find out more.

Boris Johnson rules out austerity to balance the books if coronavirus crisis damages the economy

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiSWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRoZXN1bi5jby51ay9uZXdzLzExNTIzODE3L2Nvcm9uYXZpcnVzLWxvY2tkb3duLW1vbnRocy1jYXNlcy_SAU1odHRwczovL3d3dy50aGVzdW4uY28udWsvbmV3cy8xMTUyMzgxNy9jb3JvbmF2aXJ1cy1sb2NrZG93bi1tb250aHMtY2FzZXMvYW1wLw?oc=5

2020-05-01 07:40:18Z
CAIiEEfE5pbRLDmpR8qHnNZa6VoqGQgEKhAIACoHCAow0Ij8CjCRwIgDMOSMzAU

Coronavirus: UK likely to be 'very close' to meeting COVID-19 testing target - Sky News

The government will either meet its coronavirus testing target or be "very close", a minister has told Sky News.

Health Secretary Matt Hancock had pledged that the UK would be conducting 100,000 tests for COVID-19 by the end of April.

Speaking at the government's daily coronavirus press conference, Prime Minister Boris Johnson said 81,611 tests had been carried out on Wednesday.

Health Secretary Matt Hancock MP
Hancock: Aim is 100,000 daily COVID-19 tests

Housing Secretary Robert Jenrick said Thursday's figures would be released later.

"I think we will have either met it or be very close," he told Sky News.

"In that sense the target will have succeeded because it will have galvanised people across government, in the private sector and across the country to build the network that we needed to, which is the foundation of testing, tracking and tracing, which we need in the next phase of fighting the virus."

He added: "This in itself is just a stepping stone.

More from Covid-19

"We need to go beyond 100,000, but we have now seen a very substantial increase in testing in quite a short period of time.

"In that sense, it's been a success. But there's more to be done."

'Probable we won't hit 100k tests'

Cabinet colleague Robert Buckland told Sky News on Thursday it was "probable" that the UK would not meet the target.

However, he did say the milestone would be hit in the "next few days".

NHS Providers, which represents hospitals and NHS trusts in England, has previously said the target is a "red herring" which distracts from shortcomings in the long-term COVID-19 strategy.

Mr Buckland was speaking after the PM led his first daily coronavirus news conference in more than a month following his recovery from COVID-19.

Mr Johnson said the UK was past the peak of infections and promised to set out a "comprehensive plan" next week for how the lockdown could be eased.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMibWh0dHBzOi8vbmV3cy5za3kuY29tL3N0b3J5L2Nvcm9uYXZpcnVzLXVrLWxpa2VseS10by1iZS12ZXJ5LWNsb3NlLXRvLW1lZXRpbmctY292aWQtMTktdGVzdGluZy10YXJnZXQtMTE5ODE1MjnSAXFodHRwczovL25ld3Muc2t5LmNvbS9zdG9yeS9hbXAvY29yb25hdmlydXMtdWstbGlrZWx5LXRvLWJlLXZlcnktY2xvc2UtdG8tbWVldGluZy1jb3ZpZC0xOS10ZXN0aW5nLXRhcmdldC0xMTk4MTUyOQ?oc=5

2020-05-01 06:33:37Z
52780756970704