Minggu, 16 Februari 2020

Storm Dennis strikes UK sparking flood warnings and evacuations - CNN

Storm Dennis has seen flood warnings across large parts of the country as the storm picked up Saturday and lasted into Sunday.
There were wind gusts as high as 91mph (146km/h) and more than half a month's worth of rainfall in some areas, according to a tweet from the Met Office.
Residents in South Wales were evacuated by emergency services.
More heavy rain and "very strong winds" are forecast through Sunday, said the UK's official weather forecaster.
By early Sunday morning there were 198 flood warnings in place across the country, reports PA Media, which mean immediate action must be taken. There were also a further 326 flood alerts, which warn the public to be prepared.
More intense windstorms and floods heading to UK and Europe this weekend
South Wales is one of the worst-hit areas and the situation is said to be "life-threatening." The Met Office has issued a red warning after heavy rainfall raised the risk of flooding.
"The forecast is for very significant levels of rain, especially in the eastern valleys of South Wales," said Jeremy Parr, head of flood and incident risk management for Natural Resources Wales.
"Impacts could be severe overnight, and everyone should take the warnings extremely seriously."
Storm Ciara causes travel disruptions in Europe
High winds are also possible on Sunday in Belgium, Denmark, France and Germany.
British Airways and easyJet grounded flights for safety reasons, with the budget airline confirming 230 cancellations on Saturday, according to PA.
Last weekend Storm Ciara caused hundreds of flights across Europe to be canceled, with two of Europe's busiest airports -- Frankfurt, Germany, and Amsterdam, Netherlands -- each grounding more than 100 flights due to the storm.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiSWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNubi5jb20vMjAyMC8wMi8xNi91ay9zdG9ybS1kZW5uaXMtc3VuZGF5LWludGwtZ2JyL2luZGV4Lmh0bWzSAU1odHRwczovL2FtcC5jbm4uY29tL2Nubi8yMDIwLzAyLzE2L3VrL3N0b3JtLWRlbm5pcy1zdW5kYXktaW50bC1nYnIvaW5kZXguaHRtbA?oc=5

2020-02-16 11:04:00Z
52780606533146

Caroline Flack’s Death Prompts U.K. Petition Demanding Media Inquiry - Variety

A petition calling on the U.K. government to launch an inquiry into British media coverage of public figures has garnered 60,000 signatures overnight.

The death of former “Love Island” host Caroline Flack, one of the country’s most popular TV personalities, spurred the initiative, which asks government to investigate the press following “the maltreatment of those in the public eye including Caroline Flack, (Prince Harry) and Meghan Markle, to name a few.”

“The headlines, harassment and trial by media has to end and they must be held accountable,” reads the petition, which was created by user Joshua Anthony and addressed to Oliver Dowden, the U.K.’s newly installed culture secretary.

Flack was found dead by suicide in her London apartment on Feb. 15. The 40-year-old star was set to face trial on March 4, months after she was arrested and charged with assault in December following a domestic dispute with boyfriend Lewis Burton. Flack, who appeared in court in December, denied all allegations.

The Change.org petition was set up after news broke of Flack’s death on Saturday evening and, at time of publication, is well on its way to reaching its goal of 75,000 signatures. After 10,000 signatures, petitions receive a response from the government, and after crossing 100,000 signatures, petitions are considered for debate in Parliament.

Flack’s boyfriend Burton has spoken out about Flack’s death, saying his “heart is broken” and adding that he was “not allowed to be there this time. I kept asking and asking.” Flack had been banned from any contact with Burton before the trial.

British tabloids such as The Sun are being targeted for negative coverage of Flack in recent months, and The Sun has deleted at least one article about the TV host. The outlet posted a news piece as recently as Friday about a Valentine’s Day card mocking the presenter’s alleged assault of Burton, but that article is no longer available on its website.

“Caroline’s Law” has also been trending on Twitter in the U.K., with users calling for a new law preventing libellous coverage by the press.

A public inquiry known as the Leveson Inquiry was launched in 2011 on the back of the phone hacking scandal that led to the shuttering of the Rupert Murdoch-owned Sunday tabloid News of the World. The inquiry looked to investigate the practices and ethics of the press, and ultimately recommended a new, legally recognized media regulator – the formation of which is still in process.

Tributes have poured in for Flack overnight, with “Miranda” and “Call the Midwife” star Miranda Hunt sharing a post on Twitter discussing media accountability.

“A celebrity status does not mean immunity from feeling and suffering. In fact, it is obviously something that comes with a degree of responsibility and vulnerability. It is not in any circumstances in the public interest to report that someone is looking tired, or fat, or thin, or a mess or ill,” wrote Hart.

“The reality is her death may not change accountability in journalism and the words behind the trolling and the bullying. But I think we can all agree that deep down no one wants anyone to suffer, certainly not to the level that they may take their own life.”

The U.K.’s intense media scrutiny of public figures has been keenly followed and debated in recent months following Meghan Markle’s lawsuit against the Mail on Sunday, which published a letter she wrote to her father, Thomas Markle. The media’s pursuit of Markle and husband Prince Harry contributed to the couple’s divorce from the royal family and relocation to Canada.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMicWh0dHBzOi8vdmFyaWV0eS5jb20vMjAyMC90di9nbG9iYWwvY2Fyb2xpbmUtZmxhY2tzLWRlYXRoLXByb21wdHMtdS1rLXBldGl0aW9uLWRlbWFuZGluZy1tZWRpYS1pbnF1aXJ5LTEyMDM1MDUzMDIv0gF1aHR0cHM6Ly92YXJpZXR5LmNvbS8yMDIwL3R2L2dsb2JhbC9jYXJvbGluZS1mbGFja3MtZGVhdGgtcHJvbXB0cy11LWstcGV0aXRpb24tZGVtYW5kaW5nLW1lZGlhLWlucXVpcnktMTIwMzUwNTMwMi9hbXAv?oc=5

2020-02-16 10:38:00Z
52780610940693

Coronavirus: Couple quarantined on cruise ship criticise UK government - BBC News

A British couple quarantined on a cruise liner off the Japanese port of Yokohama have accused the UK government of ignoring their pleas for help.

The US is to airlift its citizens from the Diamond Princess, which has reported 285 cases of the coronavirus - the biggest cluster outside China.

In a video on Facebook, David Abel said he had little hope of a similar rescue.

The Foreign Office told the Observer it was "working around the clock" to ensure the welfare of Britons onboard.

But Mr Abel, who describes himself as a "staunch Tory", said he had "no confidence" in Prime Minister Boris Johnson.

Speaking during a Facebook live video with his wife, Sally, he said: "When he [Johnson] just says 'keep calm, don't panic' - I'd like to see you in this situation, mate. I really would."

Mr Abel, who has become an unlikely celebrity as a result of his videos, went on to appeal to billionaire Richard Branson for help.

"So, Richard Branson, I want to ask you a question, pal," he said in a video posted on Valentine's Day.

"If you and your family were in this situation, what would you do? And please don't say 'chill out, stay calm', that's not what we want to hear.

"I'm asking, what would it cost to hire one of your smaller planes, put all the Brits on board, no flight attendants, packaged food?

"Take us to Brize Norton, take us straight into the medical facility and let us do our quarantine there by people who can speak our language."

Mr Abel added that his appeal was a reflection of "just how desperate some of the passengers are becoming".

He and his wife have previously said they have been given the option to leave and continue their quarantine ashore if they test negative for the virus, but have chosen to remain on board.

On Saturday, NHS England said all but one of the nine people being treated for the coronavirus in the UK have been discharged from hospital.

Elsewhere, the first coronavirus death outside of Asia was confirmed as having happened in France.

The victim was an 80-year-old man from China's Hubei province, according to French Health Minister Agnès Buzyn.

On Sunday, China announced a drop in new cases of coronavirus for a third consecutive day.

In total more than 68,000 people have been infected in China, with the death toll at 1,665.

Outside of China there have been more than 500 cases in nearly 30 countries. Four people have died - in France, Hong Kong, the Philippines and Japan.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiJGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy91ay01MTUxOTY4N9IBKGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy9hbXAvdWstNTE1MTk2ODc?oc=5

2020-02-16 08:40:42Z
52780605512759

Coronavirus: Couple quarantined on cruise ship criticise UK government - BBC News

A British couple quarantined on a cruise liner off the Japanese port of Yokohama have accused the UK government of ignoring their pleas for help.

The US is to airlift its citizens from the Diamond Princess, which has reported 285 cases of the coronavirus - the biggest cluster outside China.

In a video on Facebook, David Abel said he had little hope of a similar rescue.

The Foreign Office told the Observer it was "working around the clock" to ensure the welfare of Britons onboard.

But Mr Abel, who describes himself as a "staunch Tory", said he had "no confidence" in Prime Minister Boris Johnson.

Speaking during a Facebook live video with his wife, Sally, he said: "When he [Johnson] just says 'keep calm, don't panic' - I'd like to see you in this situation, mate. I really would."

Mr Abel, who has become an unlikely celebrity as a result of his videos, went on to appeal to billionaire Richard Branson for help.

"So, Richard Branson, I want to ask you a question, pal," he said in a video posted on Valentine's Day.

"If you and your family were in this situation, what would you do? And please don't say 'chill out, stay calm', that's not what we want to hear.

"I'm asking, what would it cost to hire one of your smaller planes, put all the Brits on board, no flight attendants, packaged food?

"Take us to Brize Norton, take us straight into the medical facility and let us do our quarantine there by people who can speak our language."

Mr Abel added that his appeal was a reflection of "just how desperate some of the passengers are becoming".

He and his wife have previously said they have been given the option to leave and continue their quarantine ashore if they test negative for the virus, but have chosen to remain on board.

On Saturday, NHS England said all but one of the nine people being treated for the coronavirus in the UK have been discharged from hospital.

Elsewhere, the first coronavirus death outside of Asia was confirmed as having happened in France.

The victim was an 80-year-old man from China's Hubei province, according to French Health Minister Agnès Buzyn.

On Sunday, China announced a drop in new cases of coronavirus for a third consecutive day.

In total more than 68,000 people have been infected in China, with the death toll at 1,665.

Outside of China there have been more than 500 cases in nearly 30 countries. Four people have died - in France, Hong Kong, the Philippines and Japan.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiJGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy91ay01MTUxOTY4N9IBKGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy9hbXAvdWstNTE1MTk2ODc?oc=5

2020-02-16 07:58:52Z
52780605512759

Sabtu, 15 Februari 2020

Huawei row: Australian MPs cancel UK trip amid tensions over leak - BBC News

Senior Australian MPs have cancelled a planned trip to the UK as tensions heighten over the role of Huawei in building Britain's 5G network.

Lawmakers from the intelligence and security committee had been expected to travel to the UK next month.

But the trip has been postponed amid reports of a diplomatic rift.

The decision follows a reported complaint from the UK over leaked details of a high-level meeting where Huawei was discussed.

Australia has banned the Chinese telecommunications giant from building its next-generation 5G mobile internet networks but Britain last month decided the company could continue to play a role in its system, despite pressure and warnings from Washington.

Last week, UK Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab visited Australia, where he met members of the parliament's intelligence committee.

Details of the meeting were later leaked to the Sydeny Morning Herald, which said an MP had rebuked Mr Raab in the meeting over Britain's Huawei decision, saying Australia was very disappointed.

According to Australian media that report prompted a formal complaint from Vicki Treadell, the UK's High Commissioner to Australia, to the heads of two Australian parliamentary committees.

Australia and the UK are both part of the Five Eyes intelligence alliance, which also includes the US, New Zealand and Canada.

Australia's parliament on Saturday confirmed the trip to the UK had been delayed but said it was due to the fact that the counterpart parliamentary committee in the UK was yet to be appointed following December's election.

According to the Sydney Morning Herald, in the meeting with Mr Raab, Anthony Byrne, the deputy chair of Australia's intelligence committee, said that allowing China to build the UK's 5G telecoms infrastructure was equivalent to letting Russia construct it.

"How would you feel if the Russians laid down infrastructure in your own networks? That's how we feel about Huawei," Mr Byrne was quoted as telling Mr Raab.

In a Twitter post at the time, he said the meeting had involved a "full and frank discussion" over 5G and strategic challenges. Ms Treadell was present.

There's been no official response to the reports from the British and Australian governments. The BBC has contacted the UK High Commission in Australia and the Foreign Office in London for comment.

In her letter to Australian MPs, Ms Treadell expressed her disapproval of the leak, ABC News reported.

One unnamed committee member was quoted by the Australian broadcaster as describing Ms Treadell's intervention as "foolish".

Australian Treasurer Josh Frydenberg however sought to scotch suggestions of a rift, saying "our relationship with the United Kingdom couldn't be stronger".

Why is there a row over Huawei?

Australia and other intelligence allies of the UK are concerned about its decision to give the Chinese firm access to communication networks.

Washington has pressured allies to exclude Huawei from 5G networks, arguing that its equipment could allow the Chinese state to spy via "back-doors". The firm strongly rejects that it poses any security threat.

On a visit to the UK last month after Britain's decision, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo said that the Five Eyes partnership would remain in place despite previous warnings from Washington that it could be affected.

Media playback is unsupported on your device

The UK has only given Huawei partial access to its 5G network, banning it from supplying kit to "sensitive parts", known as the core.

Last week, China's ambassador to the UK, Liu Xiaoming, said those opposed to Huawei playing a role in the UK's 5G network were conducting "a witch-hunt".

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiMWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy93b3JsZC1hdXN0cmFsaWEtNTE1MTM4ODbSATVodHRwczovL3d3dy5iYmMuY29tL25ld3MvYW1wL3dvcmxkLWF1c3RyYWxpYS01MTUxMzg4Ng?oc=5

2020-02-15 12:33:29Z
52780610520914

No rest for the 93-year-old. With the royals in turmoil, Britain needs its Queen more than ever - CNN

For the British royal family, that has meant slimming down to reflect more austere times -- as demonstrated by the ever-decreasing numbers appearing on the palace balcony during national celebrations.
The Queen's thinking was that those in the direct line of succession -- Princes Charles, William and George -- would retain the support of their siblings in carrying out their public duties, but not the many cousins that Elizabeth II and her predecessors were able to count on too.
The issue for William is that he is one of only two siblings. Which is why his brother, Prince Harry, was always seen as integral to the monarchy -- the key burden-sharer of his generation.
Who's who in the House of Windsor: Queen Elizabeth II's line of succession
You can imagine the shock then, when earlier this year Harry announced, apparently without notice, that he and his wife Meghan would be stepping back from public duties and setting up a new life in North America.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex's announcement wasn't just a personal loss for the family; it disrupted the entire structure, strategy and brand of the Crown, which is a key pillar of British democracy.
All this at a time when the ageing head of state, Queen Elizabeth II, had been hoping to step back herself at the age of 93, allowing the next generation to pick up more of her duties.
Ultimately, the departure of the Sussexes capped off a seismic 12 months that proved the British monarchy needed its Queen more than ever, firmly dispelling any suggestion that she might soon retire.

A year of royal scandal

The first royal scandal of 2019 came in January when the Queen's husband, the Duke of Edinburgh, was involved in a car crash near Sandringham, the family's estate in Norfolk, eastern England. Prince Philip was unhurt when his Land Rover flipped onto its side, though a woman in the other car was injured.
But when the 98-year-old duke -- who is rarely seen these days following his retirement in 2017 -- was spotted back behind the wheel the following day, there was a media furore.
The situation went from bad to worse when it emerged that the victim had not been immediately contacted by Prince Philip in the days after the crash. An announcement that the elderly royal would give up his driving license followed swiftly -- no doubt following discussions with his wife.
Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip during a State visit by the King and Queen of Spain in London, 2017.
The Queen is mostly based at London's Buckingham Palace during the week. As royal commentator Richard Fitzpatrick explained: "The Queen has been without her 'strength and stay' as [the duke] is based at Wood Farm on the Sandringham Estate [in Norfolk, 100 miles north of London], even though they reportedly speak every day by telephone."
Fitzpatrick added that the absence of the long-time patriarch -- who previously assumed the roles of "modernizer" and "pragmatist" -- had been keenly felt this year.
In the duke's absence, Prince Charles and his son Prince William -- also known by their official titles of the Prince of Wales and Duke of Cambridge -- started accompanying the Queen more to engagements.
It's all part of the inevitable transition to a new monarch. But abdication is dismissed out of hand by aides who point to the Queen's repeated commitments to "life-long service."
Even the idea of a regency -- where she retains the Crown but hands over all official responsibilities to Charles -- appears to be off the agenda.

Sussexes dominate headlines

Meanwhile, another royal clash with the press was brewing.
In March, a CNN investigation revealed the palace had beefed up its social media operation amid a rise in racist online abuse targeting the Duchess of Sussex. It has been devoting more resources to deleting comments targeting the duchess, blocking abusive accounts and filtering out use of the n-word along with gun and knife emojis.
At the extreme end, a far-right teenager who reportedly branded Prince Harry a "race traitor" and suggested he should be shot after his marriage to Meghan. The teen was jailed for more than four years.
Against this backdrop, the couple's battle with the British media escalated.
When the palace revealed that millions of pounds of public money had been used to renovate Frogmore Cottage, the Sussexes' family home near Windsor Castle, newspapers complained they weren't getting fair access to the family, particularly after baby Archie's christening was closed to the media.
Prince Harry and wife Meghan show their new son Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor to Meghan's mother Doria Ragland, Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, in May last year.
The couple was also accused of hypocrisy for using private jets to fly off on holiday, while campaigning on environmental issues.
In response, the pair went on the offensive over what Harry described as a tabloid campaign against Meghan that mirrored the treatment meted out to his mother, Diana, Princess of Wales.
The duchess sued the Mail on Sunday, alleging the tabloid had illegally published a private letter to her father, Thomas Markle. And the duke launched his own legal proceedings against the Daily Mirror and the Sun, over alleged phone-hacking.
All publications deny the couple's claims and have vowed to fight them vigorously.
When the Queen came to the throne in the 1950s, the media was more limited and reverential in tone. Since then, the media landscape has changed dramatically, and the intensified scrutiny on her family has taken a toll on its younger generations -- particularly the Sussexes.
Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex and Queen Elizabeth II at the Queen's Young Leaders Awards Ceremony at Buckingham Palace in June, 2018.
"I never thought that this would be easy, but I thought that it would be fair," the duchess said of her treatment by the media, in a documentary for CNN affiliate ITV News, which aired in October.
"I've really tried to adopt this British sensibility of a stiff upper lip," she said. "I tried, but I think what that does internally is probably really damaging."
Asked how she was feeling, Meghan responded, "Thank you for asking because not many people have asked if I'm okay, but it's a very real thing to be going through behind the scenes."
That comment was seen by some columnists as a slight directed at other royal family members that they haven't offered support. And was compounded by Prince Harry's acknowledgment of tensions with his older brother Prince William, saying they are on "different paths."
After the program aired, a source at Kensington Palace told the BBC that the Duke of Cambridge was "worried" about his brother.
That was followed up by a source close to the Sussexes telling CNN the couple are "single-handedly modernising the monarchy," despite officials around them being "afraid" to harness their power.

Rifts in the family

This flood of leaks and counter-leaks fueled the tabloid narrative of a rift in the family. The rumours appeared to be confirmed when the Sussexes in January announced that they would be stepping back from their senior roles, splitting their time between the UK and North America with the intention of becoming financially independent.
A source told CNN that the Queen had expressly asked Harry to hold off releasing any statements regarding the couple's future. Instead, her grandson blindsided the family by taking the somewhat nuclear option of going public, a move that reportedly "upset" Her Majesty.
Queen appoints Prince William to new role amid royal shakeup
There followed a crisis meeting at The Queen's Sandringham Estate, involving the monarch and Princes Charles, William and Harry.
In a statement issued after their talks, the Queen took on the tone of a grandmother, saying "these are complex matters for my family to resolve."
But she also had the firmness of a leader, making clear that while the Sussexes were still much-loved members of the family, they were no longer part of "the firm," as it is known.

Prince Andrew's disastrous interview

Just months earlier, the Queen's second son Prince Andrew, the Duke of York, also stepped back from public duties -- though this was more an act of damage control, than a lifestyle choice.
It followed a disastrous extended interview with the BBC in November that was designed to clear up speculation about his association with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, but had precisely the opposite effect.
Epstein had allegedly trafficked Virginia Giuffre -- previously known as Virginia Roberts -- when she was 17 years old, forcing her to have sex with his friends, including Prince Andrew.
Prince Charles, Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Andrew during the Queen's annual birthday parade, on June 08, 2019.
While the duke denied having any sexual contact with Giuffre, he didn't appear to regret his relationship with Epstein -- who died by apparent suicide in August -- and failed to express any sympathy for the disgraced banker's victims.
The fallout from the widely criticized interview dominated the tabloids for days, with reporters digging out inconsistencies in the duke's story. The situation descended into farce as pictures of a sweating Prince Andrew were dug out of the archives to undermine his claim that he didn't sweat at the time of the alleged offenses due to a medical condition.
Days later, Prince Andrew said in a statement that he did regret his association with Epstein and sympathize with his victims. But the damage had already been done, and he stepped back from his royal role, following a meeting with the Queen.
Multiple sources have made it clear to CNN that the Queen led on the issue of how to handle Andrew, just as she did during the Sussex crisis.
Despite the duke saying he was willing to help US law enforcement officials with their investigation, authorities later claimed they had received "zero" cooperation from the royal.

Political pressure

Amid all her family woes, the Queen was also tested professionally when Prime Minister Boris Johnson asked her to suspend Parliament for five weeks at the height of the Brexit political deadlock.
She rubber-stamped the request in line with her duty to stay out of politics and to act only on the advice of ministers.
But when the Supreme Court found the prorogation was illegal, it raised the uncomfortable question of whether the Queen had broken the law.
The ruling led to accusations that Johnson's government had deliberately misled the monarch as part of its strategy to secure Brexit -- but regardless, any political manoeuvre involving the Queen is the ultimate faux pas.
Queen Elizabeth II welcomes then-newly elected leader of the Conservative party, Boris Johnson, in Buckingham Palace on July 24, 2019.
Johnson was forced to personally apologize for embarrassing the monarch, according to the Sunday Times. The paper's royal sources revealed that "there was huge disquiet in the Queen's household about Johnson's decision to prorogue parliament."
The Queen famously described 1992 as her "Annus Horribilis," when three of her children endured marital strife and Windsor Castle almost burned down.
If that was the year she was tested personally, then the last 12 months are when she has been tested professionally.
The monarchy is still intact but it needs time to recalibrate. Elizabeth will be hoping that it's allowed the time to do that, without any further disruption.
She remains firmly at the helm. But part of that recalibration continues to be transitioning her heirs into their new roles.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiZmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNubi5jb20vMjAyMC8wMi8xNS9ldXJvcGUvYnJpdGlzaC1yb3lhbC1mYW1pbHktcXVlZW4tZWxpemFiZXRoLXNjYW5kYWwtZ2JyLWludGwvaW5kZXguaHRtbNIBamh0dHBzOi8vYW1wLmNubi5jb20vY25uLzIwMjAvMDIvMTUvZXVyb3BlL2JyaXRpc2gtcm95YWwtZmFtaWx5LXF1ZWVuLWVsaXphYmV0aC1zY2FuZGFsLWdici1pbnRsL2luZGV4Lmh0bWw?oc=5

2020-02-15 10:23:00Z
CAIiEK1kRkGC-8QZkLxN6IrMMKIqGQgEKhAIACoHCAowocv1CjCSptoCMPrTpgU

No rest for the 93-year-old. With the royals in turmoil, Britain needs its Queen more than ever - CNN

For the British royal family, that has meant slimming down to reflect more austere times -- as demonstrated by the ever-decreasing numbers appearing on the palace balcony during national celebrations.
The Queen's thinking was that those in the direct line of succession -- Princes Charles, William and George -- would retain the support of their siblings in carrying out their public duties, but not the many cousins that Elizabeth II and her predecessors were able to count on too.
The issue for William is that he is one of only two siblings. Which is why his brother, Prince Harry, was always seen as integral to the monarchy -- the key burden-sharer of his generation.
Who's who in the House of Windsor: Queen Elizabeth II's line of succession
You can imagine the shock then, when earlier this year Harry announced, apparently without notice, that he and his wife Meghan would be stepping back from public duties and setting up a new life in North America.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex's announcement wasn't just a personal loss for the family; it disrupted the entire structure, strategy and brand of the Crown, which is a key pillar of British democracy.
All this at a time when the ageing head of state, Queen Elizabeth II, had been hoping to step back herself at the age of 93, allowing the next generation to pick up more of her duties.
Ultimately, the departure of the Sussexes capped off a seismic 12 months that proved the British monarchy needed its Queen more than ever, firmly dispelling any suggestion that she might soon retire.

A year of royal scandal

The first royal scandal of 2019 came in January when the Queen's husband, the Duke of Edinburgh, was involved in a car crash near Sandringham, the family's estate in Norfolk, eastern England. Prince Philip was unhurt when his Land Rover flipped onto its side, though a woman in the other car was injured.
But when the 98-year-old duke -- who is rarely seen these days following his retirement in 2017 -- was spotted back behind the wheel the following day, there was a media furore.
The situation went from bad to worse when it emerged that the victim had not been immediately contacted by Prince Philip in the days after the crash. An announcement that the elderly royal would give up his driving license followed swiftly -- no doubt following discussions with his wife.
Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip during a State visit by the King and Queen of Spain in London, 2017.
The Queen is mostly based at London's Buckingham Palace during the week. As royal commentator Richard Fitzpatrick explained: "The Queen has been without her 'strength and stay' as [the duke] is based at Wood Farm on the Sandringham Estate [in Norfolk, 100 miles north of London], even though they reportedly speak every day by telephone."
Fitzpatrick added that the absence of the long-time patriarch -- who previously assumed the roles of "modernizer" and "pragmatist" -- had been keenly felt this year.
In the duke's absence, Prince Charles and his son Prince William -- also known by their official titles of the Prince of Wales and Duke of Cambridge -- started accompanying the Queen more to engagements.
It's all part of the inevitable transition to a new monarch. But abdication is dismissed out of hand by aides who point to the Queen's repeated commitments to "life-long service."
Even the idea of a regency -- where she retains the Crown but hands over all official responsibilities to Charles -- appears to be off the agenda.

Sussexes dominate headlines

Meanwhile, another royal clash with the press was brewing.
In March, a CNN investigation revealed the palace had beefed up its social media operation amid a rise in racist online abuse targeting the Duchess of Sussex. It has been devoting more resources to deleting comments targeting the duchess, blocking abusive accounts and filtering out use of the n-word along with gun and knife emojis.
At the extreme end, a far-right teenager who reportedly branded Prince Harry a "race traitor" and suggested he should be shot after his marriage to Meghan. The teen was jailed for more than four years.
Against this backdrop, the couple's battle with the British media escalated.
When the palace revealed that millions of pounds of public money had been used to renovate Frogmore Cottage, the Sussexes' family home near Windsor Castle, newspapers complained they weren't getting fair access to the family, particularly after baby Archie's christening was closed to the media.
Prince Harry and wife Meghan show their new son Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor to Meghan's mother Doria Ragland, Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, in May last year.
The couple was also accused of hypocrisy for using private jets to fly off on holiday, while campaigning on environmental issues.
In response, the pair went on the offensive over what Harry described as a tabloid campaign against Meghan that mirrored the treatment meted out to his mother, Diana, Princess of Wales.
The duchess sued the Mail on Sunday, alleging the tabloid had illegally published a private letter to her father, Thomas Markle. And the duke launched his own legal proceedings against the Daily Mirror and the Sun, over alleged phone-hacking.
All publications deny the couple's claims and have vowed to fight them vigorously.
When the Queen came to the throne in the 1950s, the media was more limited and reverential in tone. Since then, the media landscape has changed dramatically, and the intensified scrutiny on her family has taken a toll on its younger generations -- particularly the Sussexes.
Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex and Queen Elizabeth II at the Queen's Young Leaders Awards Ceremony at Buckingham Palace in June, 2018.
"I never thought that this would be easy, but I thought that it would be fair," the duchess said of her treatment by the media, in a documentary for CNN affiliate ITV News, which aired in October.
"I've really tried to adopt this British sensibility of a stiff upper lip," she said. "I tried, but I think what that does internally is probably really damaging."
Asked how she was feeling, Meghan responded, "Thank you for asking because not many people have asked if I'm okay, but it's a very real thing to be going through behind the scenes."
That comment was seen by some columnists as a slight directed at other royal family members that they haven't offered support. And was compounded by Prince Harry's acknowledgment of tensions with his older brother Prince William, saying they are on "different paths."
After the program aired, a source at Kensington Palace told the BBC that the Duke of Cambridge was "worried" about his brother.
That was followed up by a source close to the Sussexes telling CNN the couple are "single-handedly modernising the monarchy," despite officials around them being "afraid" to harness their power.

Rifts in the family

This flood of leaks and counter-leaks fueled the tabloid narrative of a rift in the family. The rumours appeared to be confirmed when the Sussexes in January announced that they would be stepping back from their senior roles, splitting their time between the UK and North America with the intention of becoming financially independent.
A source told CNN that the Queen had expressly asked Harry to hold off releasing any statements regarding the couple's future. Instead, her grandson blindsided the family by taking the somewhat nuclear option of going public, a move that reportedly "upset" Her Majesty.
Queen appoints Prince William to new role amid royal shakeup
There followed a crisis meeting at The Queen's Sandringham Estate, involving the monarch and Princes Charles, William and Harry.
In a statement issued after their talks, the Queen took on the tone of a grandmother, saying "these are complex matters for my family to resolve."
But she also had the firmness of a leader, making clear that while the Sussexes were still much-loved members of the family, they were no longer part of "the firm," as it is known.

Prince Andrew's disastrous interview

Just months earlier, the Queen's second son Prince Andrew, the Duke of York, also stepped back from public duties -- though this was more an act of damage control, than a lifestyle choice.
It followed a disastrous extended interview with the BBC in November that was designed to clear up speculation about his association with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, but had precisely the opposite effect.
Epstein had allegedly trafficked Virginia Giuffre -- previously known as Virginia Roberts -- when she was 17 years old, forcing her to have sex with his friends, including Prince Andrew.
Prince Charles, Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Andrew during the Queen's annual birthday parade, on June 08, 2019.
While the duke denied having any sexual contact with Giuffre, he didn't appear to regret his relationship with Epstein -- who died by apparent suicide in August -- and failed to express any sympathy for the disgraced banker's victims.
The fallout from the widely criticized interview dominated the tabloids for days, with reporters digging out inconsistencies in the duke's story. The situation descended into farce as pictures of a sweating Prince Andrew were dug out of the archives to undermine his claim that he didn't sweat at the time of the alleged offenses due to a medical condition.
Days later, Prince Andrew said in a statement that he did regret his association with Epstein and sympathize with his victims. But the damage had already been done, and he stepped back from his royal role, following a meeting with the Queen.
Multiple sources have made it clear to CNN that the Queen led on the issue of how to handle Andrew, just as she did during the Sussex crisis.
Despite the duke saying he was willing to help US law enforcement officials with their investigation, authorities later claimed they had received "zero" cooperation from the royal.

Political pressure

Amid all her family woes, the Queen was also tested professionally when Prime Minister Boris Johnson asked her to suspend Parliament for five weeks at the height of the Brexit political deadlock.
She rubber-stamped the request in line with her duty to stay out of politics and to act only on the advice of ministers.
But when the Supreme Court found the prorogation was illegal, it raised the uncomfortable question of whether the Queen had broken the law.
The ruling led to accusations that Johnson's government had deliberately misled the monarch as part of its strategy to secure Brexit -- but regardless, any political manoeuvre involving the Queen is the ultimate faux pas.
Queen Elizabeth II welcomes then-newly elected leader of the Conservative party, Boris Johnson, in Buckingham Palace on July 24, 2019.
Johnson was forced to personally apologize for embarrassing the monarch, according to the Sunday Times. The paper's royal sources revealed that "there was huge disquiet in the Queen's household about Johnson's decision to prorogue parliament."
The Queen famously described 1992 as her "Annus Horribilis," when three of her children endured marital strife and Windsor Castle almost burned down.
If that was the year she was tested personally, then the last 12 months are when she has been tested professionally.
The monarchy is still intact but it needs time to recalibrate. Elizabeth will be hoping that it's allowed the time to do that, without any further disruption.
She remains firmly at the helm. But part of that recalibration continues to be transitioning her heirs into their new roles.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiZmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNubi5jb20vMjAyMC8wMi8xNS9ldXJvcGUvYnJpdGlzaC1yb3lhbC1mYW1pbHktcXVlZW4tZWxpemFiZXRoLXNjYW5kYWwtZ2JyLWludGwvaW5kZXguaHRtbNIBamh0dHBzOi8vYW1wLmNubi5jb20vY25uLzIwMjAvMDIvMTUvZXVyb3BlL2JyaXRpc2gtcm95YWwtZmFtaWx5LXF1ZWVuLWVsaXphYmV0aC1zY2FuZGFsLWdici1pbnRsL2luZGV4Lmh0bWw?oc=5

2020-02-15 10:03:00Z
CAIiEK1kRkGC-8QZkLxN6IrMMKIqGQgEKhAIACoHCAowocv1CjCSptoCMPrTpgU