Harry and Meghan's new royal arrangement splits opinion in U.K. - NBCNews.com

Buckingham Palace's announcement that Prince Harry and Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, will no longer use their "royal highness" titles or receive public funds for royal duties, appears to have split opinion in the U.K.

With the agreement of Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Charles and Prince William, the pair will be allowed to step back from royal duties and Prince Harry will no longer be required for official military appointments. The pair will also no longer be funded by the British taxpayer.

However, the couple will be allowed to continue to maintain their private patronages and associations.

It follows their announcement earlier this month that they are going to "step back" from their roles as senior members of the royal family and live a more independent life.

Some have dubbed this "Megxit," a play on "Brexit", which refers to the U.K.'s decision to leave the European Union.

Jan. 18, 202001:36

Their decision made the headlines around the world and polarized opinion among British commentators.

“Comparisons are being made to the abdication crisis of 1936, but, of course, Prince Harry was not a future king necessarily,” NBC News royal contributor Camilla Tominey said Sunday, referring to the abdication of King Edward VIII to marry his American lover, Wallis Simpson.

“This separation of powers, this divorce, if you like, from the Royal Family is unprecedented in the modern era.

“In her statement last night, the Queen, like her subjects, concluded that this was not a situation where Harry and Meghan would be able to have their cake and eat it, to be half in and half out.It was basically a case of all or nothing, and clearly the Queen and the Monarchy chose the latter.”

Let our news meet your inbox. The news and stories that matters, delivered weekday mornings.

She added: “It remains to be seen whether they can transcend their previous position and sort of become for brand ambassadors for what it is that they are now selling — themselves.”

Royal author Penny Junor told U.K tabloid The Mail on Sunday that the agreement was “the best possible outcome and an outcome which will actually avoid a catastrophe” for the Royal Family.

'The country was so divided about this and so angry and so upset, so I think it was all a big mess and it was getting nastier by the day," she said.

Praising the fact that the couple would keep hold of their patronages, she added that it was a “clean break for the pair," as they will no longer receive public funds.

“There are no blurred lines. They are starting afresh," she added.

A number of charities also pledged their support for the couple, saying they “felt confident” they will still benefit from their links, even as they step back from royal duties.

In an archive shot, Britain's Queen Elizabeth, Prince Harry and Meghan, the Duchess of Sussex, pose for a picture at in London, Britain.POOL New / Reuters

Elsewhere, Alistair Bruce, a royal commentator for British broadcaster Sky News, called the agreement a “seismic announcement” from the Queen, in which she “brought down the iron fist of monarchical leadership on a problem that needed to be solved.”

He said that although her statement was full of warmth, it represented the Queen drawing a final line and making it clear that no one can be a royal and a private individual at the same time.

"This is an abdication, in a sense, from the Royal Family,” Bruce said, adding that Harry and Meghan "are now free, to a certain extent, to go and follow the dreams that they have to pursue very good works. But no longer part of the royal business.”

Meanwhile, James Cleverly, the chairman of the U.K.’s ruling Conservative Party, also told the channel: “Harry did not choose the life that he was born into."

If the queen was happy, he said, then the public should be too.

Related

But others have taken in the news less favorably.

The new arrangement means that Prince Harry will no longer carry out official military appointments, something that has been an important part of his life after serving two tours in Afghanistan.

As a result, he will stop being Captain General of the Royal Marines — the title he took from his grandfather, the Duke of Edinburgh, after he retired.

"The whole situation is extremely sad and I think it is unfortunate, after his splendid service in the military, that he will now no longer be involved with the military in the U.K.," former First Sea Lord, Lord Alan West, told U.K. broadcaster, ITV News.

Meanwhile, outspoken British TV presenter Piers Morgan, who has repeatedly attacked the couple, laid the blame squarely on Meghan, calling her “a ruthless, social climbing, fame-obsessed piece of work who’s now forced Harry from his country” in a tweet.

Morgan has also commanded the Queen for her "right decision" to tell the Sussexes to "sling their part-time royal hook".

“Meghan/Harry wanted to have their cake and eat it, but the Queen just took the cake back to the royal kitchens,” he tweeted.

Yuliya Talmazan

Yuliya Talmazan is a London-based journalist.

Matt Bradley contributed.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiY2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lm5iY25ld3MuY29tL25ld3Mvd29ybGQvaGFycnktbWVnaGFuLXMtbmV3LXJveWFsLWFycmFuZ2VtZW50LXNwbGl0cy1vcGluaW9uLXUtay1uMTExODUxNtIBLGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lm5iY25ld3MuY29tL25ld3MvYW1wL25jbmExMTE4NTE2?oc=5

2020-01-19 13:20:00Z
52780542675596

Meghan's father accuses daughter of 'cheapening' UK's royal family - Reuters

LONDON (Reuters) - Meghan Markle’s father, Thomas Markle, has accused his daughter of “cheapening” the British royal family, in part of an interview released a day after Buckingham Palace said Prince Harry and his wife would no longer be working members of the monarchy.

The palace announced on Saturday that the couple would no longer use their “Royal Highness” titles and would pay their own way in life. The monarchy had been thrown into turmoil earlier this month when Harry, 35, and his American former actress wife announced that they wanted to reduce their official duties and spend more time in North America.

Thomas Markle, who is estranged from his daughter, told Channel 5 news in a documentary that he believed Meghan, 38, was tossing away “every girl’s dream”.

“It’s disappointing because she actually got every girl’s dream. Every young girl wants to become a princess and she got that and now she’s tossing that away, for, it looks like she’s tossing that away for money,” Markle said.

The interview was filmed after the couple’s announcement that they would step back as senior members of the royal family. Channel 5 released part of the interview on Sunday and said the full documentary would air “in the coming weeks”.

Thomas Markle described the royal family as “one of the greatest long-living institutions ever”, saying that when Meghan married Harry in May 2018 they took an obligation “to be part of the royals and to represent the royals”.

“This is like one of the greatest long-living institutions ever,” he said. “They are destroying it, they are cheapening it, they’re making it shabby ... They are turning it into a Walmart with a crown of it now. It is something that is ridiculous, they shouldn’t be doing this.”

Thomas Markle and his daughter have been estranged since her marriage to Harry.

Earlier this month, the Mail on Sunday newspaper submitted its defense to court action by Meghan over the publication of a private letter she sent to her father.

Thomas Markle said he did not expect Meghan to get in contact.

“I can’t see her reaching out to me, especially now ... or Harry for that matter, but I think both of them are turning into lost souls at this point,” he said.

“I don’t know what they’re looking for. I don’t think they know what they are looking for.”

Reporting by Elizabeth Piper; Editing by Frances Kerry

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMihQFodHRwczovL3d3dy5yZXV0ZXJzLmNvbS9hcnRpY2xlL3VzLWJyaXRhaW4tcm95YWxzLWZhdGhlci9tZWdoYW5zLWZhdGhlci1hY2N1c2VzLWRhdWdodGVyLW9mLWNoZWFwZW5pbmctdWtzLXJveWFsLWZhbWlseS1pZFVTS0JOMVpJMEJS0gE0aHR0cHM6Ly9tb2JpbGUucmV1dGVycy5jb20vYXJ0aWNsZS9hbXAvaWRVU0tCTjFaSTBCUg?oc=5

2020-01-19 11:00:00Z
52780542675596

Grisly details emerge in jailhouse slaying of UK's worst pedophile - New York Post

The UK’s worst pedophile was strangled with a guitar string, choked by pens and condoms, and stabbed during a grisly jailhouse slaying last year, according to a new report detailing his demise.

Richard Huckle was behind bars in Yorkshire for abusing more than 200 Malaysian girls and boys between the ages of 6 months and 12 years when he was killed in October.

“He wasn’t just stabbed. He was strangled with a guitar string,” a source told the Toronto Sun.

Police arrested an unidentified 29-year-old fellow convict in connection with the slaying, according to the paper.

Australian cops busted Huckle, 33,  in 2014 as part of a wider probe into a since-shuttered pedophile website called “The Love Zone.”

Authorities discovered a trove of evidence on Huckle’s computer, including a manual he authored for other pedophiles on how to target vulnerable children.

“If I were to transfer my skills learned from India and tried to use them in the west, I wouldn’t last a month before I found myself in a cell,” Huckle reportedly wrote.

Huckle was handed 22 life sentences in 2016 on 71 sex abuse convictions.

Share this:

Let's block ads! (Why?)

https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiYGh0dHBzOi8vbnlwb3N0LmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzE4L2dyaXNseS1kZXRhaWxzLWVtZXJnZS1pbi1qYWlsaG91c2Utc2xheWluZy1vZi11a3Mtd29yc3QtcGVkb3BoaWxlL9IBZGh0dHBzOi8vbnlwb3N0LmNvbS8yMDIwLzAxLzE4L2dyaXNseS1kZXRhaWxzLWVtZXJnZS1pbi1qYWlsaG91c2Utc2xheWluZy1vZi11a3Mtd29yc3QtcGVkb3BoaWxlL2FtcC8?oc=5

2020-01-18 14:24:00Z
CAIiEBeodVBtY7WdNBkQqLfq6X0qGAgEKg8IACoHCAowhK-LAjD4ySww-9S0BQ

Under pressure from U.S. and China, U.K. faces dilemma on Huawei - NBC News

The United Kingdom’s relationship with the United States is facing another stern test over whether to allow the Chinese telecoms giant Huawei, which the U.S. and others accuse of being a security threat, to manage the roll-out of new broadband technology.

A meeting in London between senior U.S. and British officials this week came at an awkward time for the U.K. as it prepares to leave the European Union, the world’s largest economic bloc, at the end of the month.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s government plans to carve out its own trade relationships as an independent nation, with both the U.S. and China set to be key targets for trade deals.

On Monday, a senior U.S. delegation gave Johnson’s government a warning about the risks of allowing Huawei to build its 5G technology, arguing that doing so could compromise the two nations’ close intelligence-sharing relationship. The U.K. has yet to make a final decision, but an announcement is expected soon.

While details of the meeting were not released by either government, a senior Trump administration official said the U.S. team was in London to “share information about the risks of using Chinese vendors in 5G networks.”

Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s government plans to carve out its own trade relationships as an independent nation, with both the U.S. and China.Ben Stanstall / AFP - Getty Images

Washington has long considered Huawei a threat, fearing that its access to vast amounts of personal data could be used for espionage, and President Donald Trump signed an executive order last May effectively banning it from operating in the U.S.

Matt Pottinger, the U.S. deputy national security adviser, was at the London gathering, along with Rob Blair, an assistant to the president and special representative for international telecommunications policy; and Chris Ford, acting undersecretary of state, the administration official said.

The American team handed over a dossier outlining the risks of using Huawei and the threat to the U.S.-U.K. intelligence sharing relationship, according to multiple press reports. Both countries are members of the Five Eyes intelligence alliance, along with Canada, New Zealand and Australia. Australia and New Zealand have also ruled out using Huawei to build 5G infrastructure.

According to reports in British news outlets, including The Guardian, The Times, Sky News and the Financial Times, the U.S. dossier argued that it would be “nothing short of madness” for the U.K. to proceed with Huawei as the key contractor on 5G.

Huawei dismissed allegations that it could undermine the U.K.’s national security as “unsubstantiated.”

A map showing the rollout points for BT Group Plc's EE 5G network sits on display following a news conference in London on May 22, 2019.Chris Ratcliffe / Bloomberg via Getty Images file

Let our news meet your inbox. The news and stories that matters, delivered weekday mornings.

Stephanie Hare, a British academic and technology expert, said China was making its approach “very clear.”

“If you ban us, we’ll punish you on trade and investment,” she said. “And the U.K. desperately wants to keep China onside because of Brexit. It needs to be making greater deals.”

“At the same time, it also wants a trade deal with the U.S. and it could go to the back of the queue, as Barack Obama famously said, or it could be put front and center,” she added, referring to the former president’s criticism of the Brexit campaign.

5G, or fifth-generation telecom systems that improve on existing 4G connections, will allow internet-connected devices to operate much faster and communicate with other devices more efficiently, potentially opening up opportunities for more automation at home, in the workplace, in retail and in transportation.

Huawei already provides all four of the U.K.’s cellular networks with limited 5G technology, but the company doesn’t yet have access to the core national infrastructure, where customers’ personal details are held.

Some British analysts agree that there are real dangers to Chinese companies being involved in key information infrastructure projects.

“Whatever Huawei says about its ownership is entirely irrelevant,” said Charles Parton, a China expert at the Royal United Services Institute, a London think tank.

“The point is no Chinese company is going to turn down a request from the Chinese government to do something. It’s just not going to happen whatever the Huawei publicity machine says,” he said. “By taking on Huawei you’re putting your faith in the benevolence of the Chinese Communist Party for the next 20 years, because there are going to be many, many upgrades and so on.”

Attendees walk past the Huawei Technologies Co. booth at the MWC Shanghai exhibition in Shanghai, China in June. Qilai Shen / Bloomberg via Getty Images file

While the U.K. has made no final decision on Huawei — which has been involved in the country’s telecoms systems since 2005 — Johnson told BBC News on Wednesday that anyone who disagrees with the company having such a role should come up with an alternative.

“The British public deserve to have access to the best possible technology,” he said. “We want to put in gigabit broadband for everybody. If people oppose one brand or another they have to tell us what is the alternative.”

However, he added, in a reference to U.S. concerns, that he wouldn’t “prejudice our national security or our ability to cooperate with Five Eyes intelligence partners.”

Another senior Trump administration official told NBC News it was a “positive sign” that Johnson was open to alternatives and admitted that the U.K. has a “different philosophy” on the issue than the U.S.

The economic incentive behind 5G is huge. A report released in December by Oxford Economics, a British analysis firm, predicted that the U.K. economy could miss out on up to 11.8 billion pounds ($2.4 billion) by 2035 if it restricts the growth of 5G.

And there is a strong feeling in some parts of the British establishment that the U.S. warnings are overblown and the cost of ditching Huawei would be too high.

An employee walks past a signage for the 5G Park at the Huawei Technologies Co. headquarters in Shenzhen, China.Qilai Shen / Bloomberg via Getty Images file

Andrew Parker, head of the secretive British domestic security agency MI5, told the Financial Times on Monday that he had “no reason today to think” that the U.K. would damage its intelligence relationship with the U.S. if it chooses Huawei.

In any case, if the U.S. fails to convince the U.K. of the risks of working with Huawei, it will be faced with trying to change London’s mind, argues Hare.

“Boris Johnson knows what the alternatives are, he’s had them presented to him. What he’s really saying is that it will cost the UK billions to remove Huawei and it will probably get hit by some sort of retaliation,” she said. “What he’s really saying, the real alternative, is ‘show us the money.’”

Victor Zhang, vice president of Huawei, said in a statement: “Huawei has worked with the U.K.’s telecoms companies for 15 years and looks forward to supplying the best technologies that help companies like BT and Vodafone fulfil the government’s commitment to make gigabit broadband available to all.”

BT and Vodafone are large British telecommunications companies.

“We are confident that the U.K. government will make a decision based upon evidence, as opposed to unsubstantiated allegations,” he said.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiXWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lm5iY25ld3MuY29tL25ld3Mvd29ybGQvdW5kZXItcHJlc3N1cmUtdS1zLWNoaW5hLXUtay1mYWNlcy1kaWxlbW1hLWh1YXdlaS1uMTExODAwNtIBLGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lm5iY25ld3MuY29tL25ld3MvYW1wL25jbmExMTE4MDA2?oc=5

2020-01-18 09:32:00Z
52780555696510

Gas heating is the biggest threat to Britain's climate goal - CNN

Dozens of countries have since followed its lead to achieve "net zero" emissions, and with three decades to go before the deadline, Britain's progress provides a promising blueprint.

Its carbon emissions were 44% below 1990 levels in 2018, with renewable energy now accounting for 33% of its energy mix and coal contributing just over 5%. That is thanks in large part to its success with offshore wind and focus on nuclear energy.

But the Committee on Climate Change, an independent advisory body, warns the country must do more to meet its carbon reduction targets for 2023 to 2027. And climate activists say the government should aim for "net zero" much sooner than 2050.

Heating homes

By far the biggest threat to the United Kingdom's 2050 ambition comes from the way it heats its homes, schools and hospitals.

More than 80% of homes are connected to the gas grid, according to Ian Radley, head of gas operations at National Grid.

While natural gas emits less carbon than coal, Britain's heavy dependence on the fossil fuel is deemed unsustainable. Heat is responsible for around half of all UK CO2 emissions, according to HyDeploy, a consortium that is currently piloting hydrogen as an alternative to gas.

In other words, the UK government's £1.5 billion ($2 billion) investment into reducing emissions from road transport won't be enough to meet its 2050 target if it doesn't also tackle heating.

"The heating story is the one that usually just gets neglected. It's in the box called 'too difficult,'" Dieter Helm, professor of energy policy at Oxford University, told CNN Business. "How are you going to heat your house and do your cooking without natural gas? The answer to that question is at considerable expense."

A 2018 report commissioned by the National Infrastructure Commission, a government agency, found that decarbonizing Britain's heating infrastructure could cost as much as £450 billion ($586 billion).

The total cost of decarbonization could exceed £1 trillion ($1.3 trillion), according to the Committee on Climate Change.

Among the proposed solutions to the domestic heating challenge: stop connecting new homes to the gas grid, while encouraging existing homeowners to move to energy efficient alternatives such as hydrogen boilers.

Repurposing existing infrastructure will be critical. HyDeploy is conducting experiments at the University of Keele to establish how much hydrogen can be blended into the national grid as a replacement to gas, without people needing to buy new heating or cooking appliances. Hydrogen offers many of the benefits of natural gas, without the carbon emissions.

Production versus consumption

For Helm, even if the United Kingdom achieves its target in terms of power production, consumption is what ultimately matters.

"If we reduce carbon emissions in Britain but simply close down our large industries and import the stuff from China instead, then global warming will be worse off," Helm said. "The thing about carbon is it doesn't matter where it's emitted," he added, arguing that a carbon border tax is the only way to encourage all countries to decarbonize and ensure that "the polluter pays wherever the polluter is."

Carbon pricing mechanisms were discussed at December's UN climate summit in Madrid, but no agreement was reached on how to create a global carbon market where, for example, countries could trade greenhouse gas emission credits.

The United Kingdom will host this year's summit in Glasgow in November, and the progress made by major economies will be scrutinized, particularly following the disappointing outcome in Madrid.

The United Kingdom must have "made credible plans" to meet its 2050 target by then, according to Chris Stark, CEO of the Committee on Climate Change.

"The next 12 months are likely to be the most important yet in defining the UK's climate credentials," Stark wrote in a recent blog post.

— John Defterios contributed reporting.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiTWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNubi5jb20vMjAyMC8wMS8xOC9idXNpbmVzcy91ay1uZXQtemVyby1lbWlzc2lvbnMtMjA1MC9pbmRleC5odG1s0gFRaHR0cHM6Ly9hbXAuY25uLmNvbS9jbm4vMjAyMC8wMS8xOC9idXNpbmVzcy91ay1uZXQtemVyby1lbWlzc2lvbnMtMjA1MC9pbmRleC5odG1s?oc=5

2020-01-18 07:55:00Z
CAIiEDzAxIc6ZhS_rS8d-0Eqj8EqGQgEKhAIACoHCAowocv1CjCSptoCMPrTpgU

Countdown clock to illuminate Downing Street on Brexit Day - BBC News

A clock counting down to the moment the UK leaves the EU on 31 January will be projected on to Downing Street as part of government plans to mark Brexit Day.

The clock will tick down to 23:00 GMT, while Prime Minister Boris Johnson will give a "special" address to the nation in the evening, the government said.

A special 50p coin will also enter circulation to mark the occasion.

But the plans do not include Big Ben chiming, after Commons authorities said the cost could not be justified.

A campaign to find the £500,000 needed to make Big Ben ring when the UK leaves the EU has raised more than £200,000, but the House of Commons Commission cast doubt on whether it was permitted to use public donations to cover the costs.

Millionaire businessman Arron Banks and the Leave Means Leave group donated £50,000 to the campaign.

• Big Ben fundraiser given £50,000
• Why are Big Ben's Brexit bongs so costly?

Downing Street has said the prime minister will chair a cabinet meeting in the north of England during the day, to discuss spreading "prosperity and opportunity".

He will then make a special address to the nation in the evening.

Mr Johnson is expected to be one of the first people to receive one of the newly-minted 50p coins, which will bear the motto "peace, prosperity and friendship with all nations".

Buildings around Whitehall will be lit up to mark Brexit, with the government saying that, "in response to public calls, the Union Jack will be flown on all of the flag poles in Parliament Square".

The government says it will use the "significant moment in our history" to "heal divisions, re-unite communities and look forward to the country that we want to build over the next decade."

However, hopes have faded that Big Ben - which is currently out of action due to renovation work going on at the Houses of Parliament - will chime to mark the moment the UK leaves the EU.

Earlier this week, Mr Johnson told BBC Breakfast he wanted the public to raise funds to ensure this can happen.

The House of Commons Commission estimates the cost will be up to £500,000, and it has raised concerns over the "unprecedented approach" of using donations to fund the project.

It says this would involve bringing back the chiming mechanism and installing a temporary floor, resulting in delays to the conservation work.

But the campaign group Stand Up 4 Brexit set up an online appeal to raise the money, collecting more than £200,000 by Friday evening.

'Inflated the figure'

Conservative MP Mark Francois told BBC Radio 4's The World at One that the pro-Brexit Leave Means Leave campaign and Mr Banks had donated £50,000.

He queried whether the cost of getting the bell to ring again was really £500,000, adding that he believed officials had "deliberately inflated the figure" because "they don't want to do it".

It comes as Downing Street has said EU citizens will not automatically be deported if they fail to sign up to the settled status scheme by the 2021.

Under the settlement scheme, EU citizens living in the UK can apply to stay in the country after Brexit.

So far the number of applicants to the scheme has hit more than 2.7 million.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiLWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy91ay1wb2xpdGljcy01MTE0OTUzONIBMWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy9hbXAvdWstcG9saXRpY3MtNTExNDk1Mzg?oc=5

2020-01-18 07:17:49Z
52780553304541

Meghan Markle's UK citizenship application potentially in jeopardy if royal couple moves to Canada: reports - Fox News

Meghan Markle’s application for British citizenship could reportedly be in jeopardy if she and Prince Harry move to Canada as part of their plan to step down as senior royals.

The Duchess of Sussex started the process for citizenship shortly after her marriage to Prince Harry in May 2018, applying as the spouse of a British citizen.

Under Home Office rules, applicants are required not to have spent more than 270 days out of the country in the three years before applying, The Telegraph reported. During their engagement, Prince Harry’s spokesperson promised the duchess would be in compliance with U.K. immigration laws “at all times.”

“She may quickly run into trouble when calculating her permissible absences from the U.K.,” immigration website Free Movement reported.

MEGHAN MARKLE WOULD BE WELCOMED IN HOLLYWOOD WITH OPEN ARMS, EXPERTS SAY: 'WE'D ALL RUN TO THE PHONE'

Immigration lawyer Philip Trott told The Times of London, “There is no harm in being out, as long as you spend most of your time here...The advice we normally give to clients is that most of your time means six months and one day every year."

If Prince Harry managed to obtain an official role while in Canada, their time in the country might qualify for the Crown servant exception to residency, which would still count legally as living in the U.K., according to Free Movement.

In the unlikely event she couldn't obtain citizenship, she might still be allowed to remain in the U.K. indefinitely "at the discretion of the Home Secretary,” Free Movement reported. “There are ultimately no legal constraints on granting any form of immigration status.”

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The duchess' spokesperson said, “There is no change in the fact that she is pursuing the path to British citizenship," according to The Times of London.

Let's block ads! (Why?)

https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMikAFodHRwczovL3d3dy5mb3huZXdzLmNvbS9lbnRlcnRhaW5tZW50L21lZ2hhbi1tYXJrbGVzLWFwcGxpY2F0aW9uLWZvci1icml0aXNoLWNpdGl6ZW5zaGlwLXBvdGVudGlhbGx5LWluLWplb3BhcmR5LWlmLXJveWFsLWNvdXBsZS1tb3Zlcy10by1jYW5hZGHSAZQBaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZm94bmV3cy5jb20vZW50ZXJ0YWlubWVudC9tZWdoYW4tbWFya2xlcy1hcHBsaWNhdGlvbi1mb3ItYnJpdGlzaC1jaXRpemVuc2hpcC1wb3RlbnRpYWxseS1pbi1qZW9wYXJkeS1pZi1yb3lhbC1jb3VwbGUtbW92ZXMtdG8tY2FuYWRhLmFtcA?oc=5

2020-01-17 08:37:14Z
52780542675596