Sabtu, 31 Agustus 2019

These Are the Geekiest UK Cities According to an Infographic - GeekTyrant

Are you a geek in the United Kingdom? Well, you may want to hang out with some other geeks and thanks to the finance blog Onward, you can now know the best places in the UK to meet geeks of similar interests. The blog looked at 20 of the biggest cities in the UK and looked at how friendly they were to different kinds of geeks. The categories of geeks were comic book, video game, board game, convention, book, movie, and music/record geek. They looked at how many hotspots for each category (such as a comic book store, game store, convention, theater, etc.) and put that per 100,000 people. You can check out the infographics below, but the gist is the following list of which cities reign supreme for each category:

  • Comic Book Stores: Londonberry (2.22)

  • Video Game Stores: Lisburn (2.82)

  • Board Game Stores: Aberdeen (1.43)

  • Comic Conventions: Swansea (0.67)

  • Book Stores: Edinburgh (4.76)

  • Cinemas: Londonberry (3.33)

  • Record Stores: Bristol (2.24)

Of course, the data will be a little flawed as I’m sure there are other hotspots such as board game cafes that could’ve been taken into account as well. However, this is still pretty cool to look at. What do UK citizens think?

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://geektyrant.com/news/these-are-the-geekiest-uk-cities-according-to-an-infographic

2019-08-31 13:00:00Z
CBMiWGh0dHBzOi8vZ2Vla3R5cmFudC5jb20vbmV3cy90aGVzZS1hcmUtdGhlLWdlZWtpZXN0LXVrLWNpdGllcy1hY2NvcmRpbmctdG8tYW4taW5mb2dyYXBoaWPSAQA

10 of the UK's best railway cycle paths - The Guardian

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

10 of the UK's best railway cycle paths  The Guardian

Former railway lines up and down the country now offer great, family-friendly off-road cycle trails – and some even go up and down a bit.


https://www.theguardian.com/travel/2019/aug/31/top-10-former-railway-cycle-tracks-uk

2019-08-31 06:00:00Z
CAIiENj6zYW1xysu-mAjeom2A6kqFggEKg4IACoGCAowl6p7MN-zCTCw3Gc

Kamis, 29 Agustus 2019

Trump may regret meddling in UK Brexit negotiations | TheHill - The Hill

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson threw cat among the pigeons Wednesday by asking the queen to prorogue parliament until October 14.

Proroguing (suspending) parliament until October 14 will leave barely three days for a parliamentary Brexit debate before the all-important European Summit on October 17. That summit will be the last chance for the UK to secure a Brexit deal before Johnson’s self-imposed October 31 deadline for the United Kingdom to leave Europe with or without a deal.

Judging by the opposition’s hostile reaction to his bold political move, Johnson’s initiative is likely to usher in a prolonged period of political uncertainty. That will not be good for a weakened UK economy. It also comes at a bad time for the European economy, which already is having to cope with a German economy that is now in recession and an Italy which is in the throes of yet another political crisis.

ADVERTISEMENT

While UK politics is now in the greatest degree of flux, Johnson’s move would seem to have narrowed the its path forward to two seemingly unattractive options.

The first is that the UK will indeed crash out of Europe without a deal on October 31. Heightening that possibility is the unlikelihood that the European Commission will now offer Johnson any substantive changes to the Brexit deal that it negotiated with Johnson's predecessor, Theresa MayTheresa Mary MayBoris Johnson: Brexit chances 'touch and go' Trump promises 'very big trade deal' with Britain post-Brexit Here are the US allies that have been caught in Trump's crosshairs MORE. In particular, it is unlikely to drop its insistence on the Irish backstop, which is one of Johnson’s redlines. Fearing the precedent that it might set for other European Union members, the commission will not want to be seen to be caving in to Johnson’s Brexit brinksmanship.

The second possibility is that next week parliament will either succeed in passing legislation to force Johnson to ask the Europeans for an extension of the October 31 deadline or succeed in bringing down Johnson’s government by a no-confidence vote. It would seem that under either of these two scenarios Johnson would be forced to have early elections.

The Bank of England and the IMF have indicated that if the UK were to crash out of Europe without a deal, within a year or two UK output could be as much as 5 percent below where it otherwise would have been. This view is echoed by most mainstream economic forecasters. It is also basically shared by the UK business community, which is imploring Johnson not to risk a no-deal Brexit.

While forcing Johnson to seek an extension of the October 31 deadline or else by successfully passing a no-confidence vote, parliament might spare the country from the worst-case economic scenario. But it would not be without considerable risks.

ADVERTISEMENT

Early elections might usher in a far-left Jeremy Corbyn government that would take the country back to the failed policies of the 1970s. Alternatively it might see Boris Johnson winning that election on a hard-Brexit platform. That in turn only will have delayed by a few months the UK’s crashing out of Europe with all of its negative consequences.

To its great discredit, the Trump administration has been egging Johnson on to leave Europe without a deal. It has done so by making him the illusory promise of a speedy U.S.-UK free trade deal on the most favorable of terms for the UK.

Sadly, the chances are now high that the Trump administration will get the hard-Brexit that it has been wanting. But the chances are also very high that the Trump administration will come to regret its role in engineering that outcome. It will do so when it sees the immediate damage that a hard-Brexit will do to the UK and the negative spillover effects that a hard UK economic landing will have on a global economy that is already slowing down markedly.

Desmond Lachman is a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. He was formerly a deputy director in the International Monetary Fund's Policy Development and Review Department and the chief emerging market economic strategist at Salomon Smith Barney.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://thehill.com/opinion/international/459189-trump-may-regret-meddling-in-uk-brexit-negotiations

2019-08-29 11:30:12Z
52780365331487

Brexit Is The Latest Blow To The British Pound, Once A Symbol Of Economic Might - NPR

The pound was long the symbol of Britain's economic might. The chaos surrounding the country's 2016 decision to leave the European Union has sent the currency falling sharply. WPA Pool/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption
WPA Pool/Getty Images

The British pound sterling is the oldest currency still in use in the world, dating to the time when Britain was little more than a collection of warring fiefdoms regularly plundered by Vikings.

Since its first use in the eighth century, the pound has survived revolutions and world wars, the industrial age and Thatcherism, and today it remains a powerful reminder of the glory days of the British empire.

But over the years, the pound has lost a lot of its luster, and in the wake of the Brexit turmoil, some economists believe it will only keep losing value.

For Britain, the pound is a rich cultural symbol. Pound notes have been adorned with pictures of the most illustrious figures in British history, including William Shakespeare, Jane Austen, Winston Churchill and Charles Darwin.

The pound's place in British culture became apparent during the debate over the euro in the late 1990s. The nations of Europe were about to give up their francs, deutsche marks and lire in favor of a new currency they hoped would unite the continent in peace and prosperity and solidify its political and economic power.

Tourists would no longer have to exchange money each time they visited a new country. Businesses could trade freely across borders, without worrying about currency fluctuations.

Only Britain balked at the change.

"We will not seek membership of the single currency on 1st January 1999," then-Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown told Parliament.

Today, the U.K.'s decision to stick with the pound — also known as sterling or, more colloquially, the quid — is seen by many economists as a prudent move, one that helped Britain recover faster after the Great Recession.

But Britain's decision was driven as much by culture as economics.

"We're a very proud nation. Used to rule the waves," says British businessman Cliff Franklin, who lives in New York. "And the pound is dear to British people's hearts. And I'm sure it would have been a cultural nightmare to try to get rid of it and go into the euro."

Throughout its history, as Britain's power grew, so too did the importance of its currency.

During the reign of Queen Victoria, Britain became a major commercial and industrial center. British capital financed railroads in India and Australia, shipping ports in Asia and cotton plantations in the United States. The pound itself could be used to buy and sell anywhere on Earth.

"If you go back to the 19th century, the British pound occupied the place in the global economy that the U.S. dollar does today," says Niall Ferguson, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution and the author of The Ascent of Money.

But the 20th century, with its two world wars, saw a slow, gradual decline in Britain's power and a commensurate drop in the value of the pound.

"It's difficult to maintain a dominant currency if you put yourself through a world war as costly and destructive as World War I was for Britain," Ferguson says.

"The empire is no more," says economist Rex McKenzie of Kingston University in London. "The influence of the country has declined, and that is being reflected in the ... exchange rate."

One of the most dramatic chapters in the pound's long decline was known as Black Wednesday.

On Sept. 16, 1992, deep-pocketed investors led by George Soros made huge bets against the pound, ultimately driving down its value. Soros is said to have made more than $1 billion that day.

Before then, the pound was pegged to a basket of European currencies; afterward, the government was forced to let the pound float freely in currency markets.

Having an independent currency was a big advantage after the financial collapse of 2008, giving the Bank of England more flexibility to respond to a fast-moving crisis.

"The problem with the euro was that the policies that helped Germany weren't necessarily the ones that were right for Greece or Spain or Italy or other places," says Dartmouth College economist David Blanchflower.

Having an independent central bank "turned out to be a smart thing, and having a currency that you could depreciate was a really big deal," says Blanchflower, who sat on Britain's equivalent of the Federal Reserve committee that sets interest rates.

Britain has tried often over the years to prop up the pound, with diminishing success.

"My childhood was in some ways scarred by periodic sterling crises," Ferguson says. "I think they were my introduction to economics as a boy growing up in Britain."

Loading...

Don't see the graphic above? Click here.

More recently, the government's chronic inability to come up with a Brexit plan has sent the pound tumbling to a record low against the dollar, notes Simon Johnson, former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund.

When Britain voted to leave the European Union in 2016, the pound was worth nearly $1.50. Since then it has steadily lost value and trades today at just above $1.20. Many economists think it could soon reach parity with the dollar, something that would be unprecedented.

A drop in value is something of a mixed bag for the pound. It makes imported products more expensive inside the country, buy it also helps British companies compete by driving down the price of the goods they sell abroad.

Still, the pound's steady decline underscores the shifting fortunes of Britain itself and its diminished place in a global economy dominated by the United States and, increasingly, China.

How much further can it fall? Johnson doesn't want to hazard a guess. While the British economy is "running at a fairly decent clip right now," he says, confidence in Britain's ability to manage its departure from the European Union is waning.

"It depends, really, on how disruptive the Brexit developments are and precisely how that affects British trade," Johnson says.

Dartmouth's Blanchflower says the ongoing Brexit fiasco could send the pound's value falling below that of the euro or the U.S. dollar, something that's never happened before.

"The chaos that sits around a possible no-deal Brexit is scaring the markets," he says. "And so the pound is falling steadily."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.npr.org/2019/08/29/755014398/like-the-empire-itself-the-british-pound-is-not-what-it-used-to-be

2019-08-29 11:07:00Z
52780367493224

Collapse us if you can, British government dares Brexit opponents - Reuters

LONDON (Reuters) - Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s government on Thursday challenged opponents of Brexit in parliament to collapse the government or change the law if they wanted to thwart Britain’s exit from the European Union.

A pro-Brexit supporter carries a banner during an anti-Brexit protest, outside the Houses of Parliament in London, Britain August 28, 2019. REUTERS/Henry Nicholls

More than three years since the Brexit referendum, the United Kingdom is heading toward its gravest constitutional crisis in decades and a showdown with the EU over Brexit due in just 63 days time.

In his boldest step since becoming prime minister last month, Johnson enraged opponents of a no-deal Brexit on Wednesday by ordering the suspension of parliament for almost a month.

The speaker of the lower house of parliament, John Bercow, said that was a constitutional outrage as it limited the time the 800-year-old heart of English democracy has to debate and shape the course of British history.

But Jacob Rees-Mogg, the Brexit supporter who is in charge of managing government business in parliament, dared opponents to do their worst.

“All these people who are wailing and gnashing of teeth know that there are two ways of doing what they want to do,” Rees-Mogg told the BBC.

“One, is to change the government and the other is to change the law. If they do either of those that will then have an effect.

“If they don’t have either the courage or the gumption to do either of those then we will leave on the 31st of October in accordance with the referendum result.”

Johnson’s move to suspend parliament for longer than usual at one of the most crucial junctures in recent British history was cheered by U.S. President Donald Trump but provoked criticism from some British lawmakers and media.

“Boris Johnson’s suspension of parliament is an affront to democracy,” The Financial Times said in an editorial.

TORTUOUS NEGOTIATIONS

After years of tortuous negotiations and a series of political crises since the United Kingdom voted 52% to 48% to leave the EU in the 2016 referendum, Brexit remains up in the air. Options range from an acrimonious divorce on Oct. 31 and an election to an amicable exit or even another referendum.

In effect, Johnson’s order to suspend parliament forces opponents of a no-deal Brexit in parliament to show their hand and act in as few as four days sitting next month. Parliament returns from its summer holiday on Sept. 3.

An election is likely.

“Boris is obviously preparing for an election,” said Conservative lawmaker Ken Clarke.

“He’s decided that he wants a people versus foreigners election, and a people versus parliament election, and he’s blustering away with ‘making this country the greatest country in the world’, patriotism, Donald Trump-style stuff.”

Johnson is also trying to convince the EU that his threat of a no-deal exit is real.

Britain’s opposition Labour Party will seek an emergency debate on Brexit next week, the party’s trade spokesman Barry Gardiner said, outlining plans which could give them an opening to pass legislation to block a no-deal Brexit.

Slideshow (2 Images)

“On Monday, we will introduce what is known as a Standing Order Section 24 Motion and that would be to try and have an emergency debate,” Gardiner told Sky News.

There is a small majority against a no-deal Brexit in the 650-seat House of Commons though it is unclear if opponents of Johnson within the Conservative Party would collapse his government in a vote of no confidence.

Editing by Janet Lawrence

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu-idUSKCN1VJ0JX

2019-08-29 06:36:00Z
52780365331487

Rabu, 28 Agustus 2019

Boris Johnson asks Queen to suspend UK Parliament ahead of Brexit: Live updates - CNN International

Boris Johnson's decision has sparked outrage because it makes a no-deal Brexit more likely. Experts have been warning that scenario would have major implications, because the UK's membership in the European Union touches on almost every aspect of the country's economy.

Here are some potential problems:

  • Trade disruption

EU membership allows British businesses to trade freely across the bloc, without the need to have extra permits or pay tariffs.

If the UK crashes out without a deal, that link will be severed abruptly and businesses will face extra costs. Business lobby groups say these could be too much for some companies, which may not survive. If companies start collapsing, jobs will disappear and the economy will suffer.

  • Food and medicines shortages

A no-deal Brexit would likely mean new checks at the borders, which could delay imports. For some products border delays could prove catastrophic -- fresh fruit and other foodstuffs could rot while stuck in lorry queues.

Medical supplies coming from Europe could be affected too, because of extra red tape. French drugmaker Sanofi and its Swiss rival Novartis said they would stockpile key medicines ahead of Brexit.

No-deal Brexit could cause food shortages.
No-deal Brexit could cause food shortages. Photo: Anna-Rose Gassot/AFP/Getty Images
  • Recession?

According to the government's own assessment published in November, leaving without a deal would result in the UK economy being 7.7% smaller 15 years after Brexit.

The damage would be even greater if net migration from the European Union substantially dropped, the government said.

  • Farming problems

The UK is a major agricultural exporter and the National Farmers' Union had warned that a no-deal scenario would be devastating for the sector. Up to 65% of Britain's agriculture exports go to the EU.

  • Border delays

A study by Imperial College in London found that two extra minutes spent checking each vehicle, be it at the ferry port in Dover in southern England, or the Eurotunnel terminal nearby, could translate to jams of up to 29 miles.

Read a full overview of the risks of no-deal Brexit here.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnn.com/europe/live-news/brexit-parliament-suspension-gbr-intl/index.html

2019-08-28 19:17:00Z
52780365331487

Brexit shock as UK PM asks Queen to suspend Parliament: Live updates - CNN International

Opponents of a no-deal Brexit just got royally outflanked.

Boris Johnson’s wheeze of getting the Queen to order a five-week suspension of Parliament means his critics have much less time than they thought to prevent the UK leaving the European Union without a deal on October 31.

Before today, their preferred option was to pass a law requiring the government to seek an extension to the Brexit deadline and hold a second referendum, should negotiations with the EU fail to result in a deal.

But with Parliament due to return from its annual summer break on September 3, they now have just four days to engineer the required legislation before Johnson’s suspension takes effect.

That could force them to fall back on Plan B – a vote of no-confidence in the government. The trouble is, for that to succeed, they need Conservative lawmakers to vote against their own party, which was always going to be a tall order.

In any event, a new parliamentary session will begin on October 14 with the traditional State Opening of Parliament and Queen’s Speech, when the monarch reads out a text written by Downing Street that sets out the government’s legislative priorities. That’s typically followed by several days of parliamentary debate. And while Johnson has hitherto been happy to tear up the norms of British political life, this is a tradition that will suit him very well.

An EU Council summit is due to take place on October 17 and 18. If Johnson returns from this event brandishing a new Brexit deal, he will hope to ram it through Parliament in the two weeks left until Brexit day. And after that? A swift general election, riding the wave of Brexit triumph, to cement his authority?

But if negotiations with the EU fail and Johnson sets a path to no-deal, things could look very different. The trouble for his opponents is that, by this point, their room for maneuver would be severely limited.

Even if they could muster enough support to pass a vote of no confidence, UK law sets out a two-week window for a new government to be formed, or a general election to be called. Meanwhile, the Brexit countdown clock would continue to tick.

Opponents of Brexit are already denouncing Johnson’s machinations as a constitutional outrage and are planning a parliamentary showdown next week.

Johnson however, seems very pleased with himself, pointing out that Parliament will be sitting in the run-up to Brexit and the whole affair is perfectly in order, given that his predecessor, Theresa May, had allowed the previous parliamentary session to drag on.

Whatever happens, it’s clear that next week will be very bumpy indeed ­– and, as ever with Brexit, only the rashest of pundits would attempt to predict the outcome with any degree of certainty. Time to buckle up.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnn.com/europe/live-news/brexit-parliament-suspension-gbr-intl/index.html

2019-08-28 10:56:00Z
52780365331487