Kamis, 16 Mei 2019

Huawei role in UK 5G network an unnecessary risk, ex-MI6 chief says - BBC News

Giving the Chinese telecoms firm Huawei a role in building the UK's 5G network poses an unnecessary risk to national security, a former MI6 chief has said.

Sir Richard Dearlove said such a move could give the Chinese government a "potentially advantageous exploitative position" in the UK's telecoms network.

It follows reports last month that the PM is ready to let the firm supply some parts of the UK's 5G infrastructure.

A Huawei spokesman said Sir Richard's warnings were "short on fact".

Sir Richard's intervention comes as US President Donald Trump signed an executive order effectively banning American firms from using foreign telecoms deemed to pose a threat to national security.

Although it does not name Huawei, it is widely considered to be aimed at the firm following repeated warnings by US officials that it could be used by the Chinese state to spy on or sabotage foreign networks.

The company has vehemently denied the allegations and insists it is independent from state control.

'Aggressive intelligence gathering'

In a foreword to a new report by the Henry Jackson Society think tank, Sir Richard said: "The fact that the British government now appears to have decided to place the development of some of its most sensitive critical infrastructure in the hands of a company from the People's Republic of China (PRC) is deeply worrying.

"The PRC uses its sophisticated technical capabilities not only to control its own population (to an extreme and growing degree), but it also conducts remotely aggressive intelligence gathering operations on a global scale.

"No part of the communist Chinese state is ultimately able to operate free of the control exercised by its Communist Party leadership.

"To place the PRC in a potentially advantageous exploitative position in the UK's future telecommunications systems therefore is a risk, however remote it may seem at the moment, we simply do not need to take."

Last month, former defence secretary Gavin Williamson was sacked after details about Huawei's potential involvement in the UK's 5G network - discussed at the National Security Council - were leaked to the Daily Telegraph.

In the paper's report, Mrs May was said to have overridden ministers who had expressed concerns about the plans.

Mr Williamson has strenuously denied leaking the information.

The government has insisted no final decision has been taken on Huawei's involvement in the UK network, although the issue remains highly sensitive in Whitehall.

Sir Richard said the government - which has been seeking to build economic links with China - should not be influenced by fears of economic reprisals by Beijing if Huawei is excluded.

"If Australia can blackball Huawei as its 5G provider, the UK can certainly do the same without undue concern about the consequences," he said.

A Huawei spokesman said: "This report is long on politically motivated insinuation but short on fact.

"It fundamentally misunderstands the nature of modern China, global technology markets and of 5G.

"The isolationist approach they recommend may support an America-first trade agenda but it's hard to see how it's in UK's national interest."

A government spokesman said individual countries were taking "a range of different approaches" to the issue of 5G security.

"There are no universal solutions," the spokesman said.

"Whatever final decision the UK government takes about 5G network infrastructure, the UK is not considering any options that would put our national security communications at risk, within the UK and with our closest allies."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-48297407

2019-05-16 12:27:37Z
CBMiJGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy91ay00ODI5NzQwN9IBKGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy9hbXAvdWstNDgyOTc0MDc

UK government says it will introduce Brexit bill as soon as possible - Reuters

FILE PHOTO: British Prime Minister Theresa May holds a news conference following an extraordinary European Union leaders summit to discuss Brexit, in Brussels, Belgium April 11, 2019. REUTERS/Yves Herman/File Photo

LONDON (Reuters) - The British government will introduce the Brexit Withdrawal Agreement Bill to parliament as soon as possible in order to give lawmakers time to scrutinize it, the leader of the House of Commons Andrea Leadsom said on Thursday.

The government has said parliament will hold its first debate and vote on the bill, which will enact Prime Minister Theresa May’s Brexit deal, in the week beginning June 3. The bill itself could be published as soon as next week however.

“The bill will be introduced as soon as possible to give colleagues the chance to consider the provisions within it,” Leadsom told parliament.

Reporting by Kylie MacLellan; editing by Stephen Addison

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu-bill/uk-government-says-it-will-introduce-brexit-bill-as-soon-as-possible-idUSKCN1SM13L

2019-05-16 11:04:00Z
CBMihQFodHRwczovL3d3dy5yZXV0ZXJzLmNvbS9hcnRpY2xlL3VzLWJyaXRhaW4tZXUtYmlsbC91ay1nb3Zlcm5tZW50LXNheXMtaXQtd2lsbC1pbnRyb2R1Y2UtYnJleGl0LWJpbGwtYXMtc29vbi1hcy1wb3NzaWJsZS1pZFVTS0NOMVNNMTNM0gE0aHR0cHM6Ly9tb2JpbGUucmV1dGVycy5jb20vYXJ0aWNsZS9hbXAvaWRVU0tDTjFTTTEzTA

UK leader under pressure as rivals push for the end of May - Fox News

British Prime Minister Theresa May is facing an uncomfortable meeting with Conservative Party lawmakers who are demanding she quit within weeks.

Executive members of a committee that oversees party leadership contests are meeting May Wednesday. Committee member Geoffrey Clifton-Brown said members wanted May to "set out a timetable to trigger a leadership contest."

Pro-Brexit lawmakers are furious that Britain has not yet left the European Union, almost three years after voters backed Brexit in a referendum. Many blame May for the impasse.

May argues that she struck a divorce deal with the EU, but it has been rejected by Parliament three times.

The prime minister plans to make a fourth attempt next month to get lawmakers' backing for Brexit terms.

Britain is due to leave the EU on Oct. 31.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.foxnews.com/world/uk-leader-under-pressure-as-rivals-push-for-the-end-of-may

2019-05-16 09:27:21Z
CBMiWGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmZveG5ld3MuY29tL3dvcmxkL3VrLWxlYWRlci11bmRlci1wcmVzc3VyZS1hcy1yaXZhbHMtcHVzaC1mb3ItdGhlLWVuZC1vZi1tYXnSAVxodHRwczovL3d3dy5mb3huZXdzLmNvbS93b3JsZC91ay1sZWFkZXItdW5kZXItcHJlc3N1cmUtYXMtcml2YWxzLXB1c2gtZm9yLXRoZS1lbmQtb2YtbWF5LmFtcA

Rabu, 15 Mei 2019

The UK will either cancel Brexit or leave with no deal if MPs block Theresa May's bill, Liam Fox says - Business Insider

Liam FoxTrade Secretary Liam FoxLeon Neal/Getty Images

  • The UK will either cancel Brexit or leave without a deal if MPs block a key piece of legislation next month.
  • That's according to Liam Fox, the Secretary of State for International Trade.
  • Fox on Wednesday urged MPs to back the Withdrawal Agreement Bill next month or risk "democratically" and "economically damaging" outcomes for the UK.
  • The government will lay down the Withdrawal Ageement Bill (WAB) on the week beginning June 3.
  • Theresa May is currently set to lose the vote — and potentially lose her job.

LONDON — The United Kingdom will be forced either to cancel Brexit or leave the European Union without a deal if MPs reject a crucial piece of legislation next month, according to minister Liam Fox.

Speaking at the Institute for Government in Westminster on Wednesday, the Secretary of State for International Trade warned MPs that failing to back the Withdrawal Agreement Bill would leave two potential outcomes.

"There will be an opportunity for MPs to decide, after the local elections and after the European elections, whether they want to vote for Brexit or not," Fox said.

"I think that MPs will need to look and see whether they want to continue down a path that inevitably, I think, takes us to either the potential revocation of Article 50 or leaving without a deal."

He added: "Is that he best course, democratically or economically, for the UK?

"MPs will have to face that decision."

Downing Street announced on Tuesday evening that Theresa May's government would lay a key piece of Brexit legislation called the Withdrawal Agreement Bill — also known as WAB — on the week beginning Monday, June 3.

The bill is not the same as the deal May negotiated, but it must be passed by Parliament for Brexit to be recognised in UK law.

The prime minister, who is widely expected to face another leadership coup in the coming weeks, faces an uphill battle trying to convince the House of Commons majority to back WAB.

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn will instruct his MPs to vote against it unless and until May accepts his proposed changes to the Brexit deal. That appears unlikely, with cross-party talks failing to produce any real progress.

A significant number of Conservative backbench MPs who vehemently oppose May's deal are also set to oppose WAB, as well as the Democratic Unionist Party, and the anti-Brexit opposition parties in the Commons.

The vote is widely seen as a potential make-or-break moment for the embattled prime minister, with swathes of Conservatives MPs keen to oust her and replace her with a leader who campaigned for Brexit. 

Speaking on Wednesday, Fox — one of the Cabinet's leading Brexiteers — warned May not to retain a customs union with the EU after Brexit, as demanded by the Labour Party in the cross-party talks.

This week a number of senior Tories, including ex-Cabinet ministers and current leadership favourites Boris Johnson and Dominic Raab, sent a letter to May warning her that a customs union would be "bad policy and bad politics".

Fox said that staying in a permanent customs union would have a significant negative "impact" on the Department for International Trade, and act as a "major disincentive for other countries to negotiate trade agreements" with the UK.


Got a tip? Email this reporter at apayne@businessinsider.com and send him a direct message on Twitter at @adampayne26.

Our Brexit Insider Facebook group is the best place for up-to-date news and analysis about Britain’s departure from the EU, direct from Business Insider’s political reporters. Join here.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.businessinsider.com/liam-fox-if-mps-block-wab-uk-will-cancel-brexit-or-leave-with-no-deal-2019-5

2019-05-15 10:51:21Z
CAIiEBu_TpqtLenjE8kA4emhEeIqLggEKiUIACIbd3d3LmJ1c2luZXNzaW5zaWRlci5jb20vc2FpKgQICjAMMJzw5wE

UK tabloid talk show canceled after death of guest - go.com

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory/uk-tabloid-talk-show-canceled-death-guest-63046662

2019-05-15 10:37:00Z
CBMiYWh0dHBzOi8vYWJjbmV3cy5nby5jb20vRW50ZXJ0YWlubWVudC93aXJlU3RvcnkvdWstdGFibG9pZC10YWxrLXNob3ctY2FuY2VsZWQtZGVhdGgtZ3Vlc3QtNjMwNDY2NjLSAWVodHRwczovL2FiY25ld3MuZ28uY29tL2FtcC9FbnRlcnRhaW5tZW50L3dpcmVTdG9yeS91ay10YWJsb2lkLXRhbGstc2hvdy1jYW5jZWxlZC1kZWF0aC1ndWVzdC02MzA0NjY2Mg

Glasgow aims to be the UK's first 'net-zero' city - BBC News

Glasgow and Edinburgh are going head-to-head to try to become the UK's first "net zero" city.

Both cities have now unveiled ambitious plans to cut greenhouse emissions to a neutral level.

Glasgow wants to reach the target "well before" 2045, while Edinburgh has set its target to 2030.

Scottish Power is helping Glasgow with its aims and says a "race to zero" is exactly what is needed to effect a significant change.

The company believes if inner cities can achieve the goal, then any location can.

Both bids exceed the Scotland-wide 2045 ambition announced by the Scottish government earlier this month.

Glasgow's plans include mass charging points for electric vehicles.

Glasgow City Council and Scottish Power say they will work on a range of programmes to help the city reach the target, including the power giant investing in electric buses.

Edinburgh's initiative will concentrate on local supply chains being redeveloped for "construction and refurbishment in low carbon design".

A "circular economy" could be created - focusing on local production, low waste and increased recycling. More renewable energy will be generated locally.

Net-zero is the point where the same volume of greenhouse gases is being emitted as is being absorbed through offsetting techniques like forestry.

Scottish Power chief executive Keith Anderson says Scotland was right to put itself at the front of the race to become net-zero.

Speaking on BBC's Good Morning Scotland programme, he said: "If this declaration kick starts a race to zero with other ambitious cities, like Edinburgh, because then we will all be winners.

"The prize is the future of our country and our planet.

"For Scotland to get to net carbon zero by 2045 the cities have to get there first. Edinburgh has announced plans to be more ambitious and we are working very closely with Glasgow council, so let's have some competition.

"A 'race to zero' is a good thing. It is a healthy thing and will create a better environment, cleaner air, so let's go on and start the race."

Climate emergency

The move came after Nicola Sturgeon declared a "climate emergency" at the SNP party conference last month.

A week later the Scottish government said it would legislate to reduce greenhouse emissions to net-zero by 2045.

Advice from the Committee on Climate Change urged Scotland to set the target five years ahead of the UK as a whole because of its potential for planting trees.

Scottish Power said renewable energy capacity had to quadruple and electricity generation needed to double before Scotland could meet the target.

What does net-zero mean?

The terms carbon neutral and net-zero are often used interchangeably but there are differences.

Carbon dioxide (CO2) is the most abundant greenhouse gas but there are others which the Scottish government counts and they are not all carbon-based.

Therefore, some climate change campaigners prefer the term net-zero as it includes not just CO2 and methane but also nitrous oxide, which is emitted during agricultural and industrial activities as well as from fossil fuels.

Simply being carbon neutral would not stop global warming because these other gases are also harmful to the atmosphere.

Perhaps an even better term would be "climate neutral".

Glasgow's plan

Glasgow was the location of Scotland's first low emission zone (LEZ), which intends to phase out the dirtiest buses from the city centre over five years.

The UK's largest onshore wind farm, Whitelee, which is owned by Scottish Power, is on the outskirts of the city.

The focus is now expected to turn to other parts of the city's economy that can be decarbonised, such as transport and heating.

Among the issues they are expected to tackle is that of electric vehicle charging.

More than 70% of the city's residents living in flats are unable to charge electric cars as they have no off-street parking.

Scottish Power says it is planning a charging system where people can rapidly charge their vehicles away from home - at work or at public charging locations.

Sites for these locations are being assessed and the scheme could become a template for other UK cities facing similar problems.

Glasgow City Council leader Susan Aitken said: "We simply have to act now and the Glasgow city government will develop those partnerships necessary to get to where we simply have to be. We need to be a net-zero city. And we need to be the UK's first net-zero city."

Edinburgh's mission

Council heads in the capital have set one of the most ambitious targets globally - 15 years earlier than the Scottish government's ambition.

The council says it faces "tough choices" including replacing conventional gas boilers in properties with carbon neutral alternatives.

It will also become more difficult to access the city centre by car with priority given to cyclists, pedestrians and those using public transport.

Freight hubs could also be set up outside the city - allowing for low carbon alternatives to bring goods into the Capital.

There will be an increase in council and city generation of renewable energy including the "use of council land and property for micro-generation, support local groups to develop renewables projects and encourage innovation in adopting new technologies".

Waste services are also set for an overhaul. The council hopes to develop a new "energy recovery facility" to manage non-recyclable waste.

Council leader Adam McVey said: "We are quite clear the 2030 target should be the target for this organisation and this city - but with a hard limit of 2037.

"I think it's important that this organisation responds to the challenges we all recognise they are incredibly serious. I think it's important that we as a city take our responsibility seriously."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-48269986

2019-05-15 10:30:00Z
CBMiLWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy91ay1zY290bGFuZC00ODI2OTk4NtIBMWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmJiYy5jb20vbmV3cy9hbXAvdWstc2NvdGxhbmQtNDgyNjk5ODY

Brexit: MPs to vote on withdrawal bill in early June - BBC News

Media playback is unsupported on your device

Theresa May is giving MPs another chance to vote on Brexit in early June - whether or not the government and Labour have reached a deal by then.

A vote on the bill that would pave the way for Brexit was "imperative" if the UK was to leave the EU before MPs' summer recess, Downing Street said.

Labour sources say they will not back the bill without a cross-party deal.

If Mrs May's plan is defeated, Number 10 said the UK is set for no deal or for Article 50 to be revoked.

That is because the EU will not grant a further extension beyond 31 October, says BBC assistant political editor Norman Smith.

Attempts to find a cross-party compromise began after the PM's Brexit deal was rejected three times by MPs.

But government sources have told the BBC that there would not be a further attempt if the plan is rejected.

The vote - which will take place when MPs return from half-term recess - would bring the withdrawal agreement into UK law via the Withdrawal Agreement Bill.

The prime minister has negotiated a withdrawal agreement with the EU, which MPs have effectively rejected three times in Commons votes.

Further talks

The prime minister and Mr Corbyn met on Tuesday evening to discuss the ongoing talks.

Number 10 described the discussions as "both useful and constructive".

A spokesman said Mrs May had made clear the government's "determination to bring the talks to a conclusion and deliver on the referendum result to leave the EU".

A Labour party spokesman said Mr Corbyn had "raised doubts over the credibility of government commitments, following statements by Conservative MPs and cabinet ministers seeking to replace the prime minister".

He also said the Labour leader had called for "further movement" from the government and that the prime minister's team had agreed to bring back "further proposals tomorrow".

Bringing the EU Withdrawal Agreement Bill forward would allow the prime minister to push ahead with her ambition of delivering Brexit before the summer - despite the lack of agreement so far in the cross-party talks, said BBC political correspondent Iain Watson.

'What has changed?'

Brexit Secretary Steve Barclay said: "It is now time for Parliament to make a decision, reflecting the manifestos of both the Conservative and Labour parties at the last general election and to deliver Brexit in the way that the public were promised."

In the 2017 general election, the two main parties promised in their manifestos to respect the result of the Brexit referendum.

International Trade Secretary Liam Fox said that if MPs do not vote for the government's Brexit plan next month, then it will "take us to either the potential of revocation of Article 50 or leaving without a deal".

He said MPs will have to decide "if they want to vote for Brexit or not".

Brexiteer and Conservative MP Steve Baker said bringing the bill forward "over the heads" of DUP MPs - on whom the government relies for a majority - would "eradicate the government's majority".

"What is the government thinking?" he asked.

DUP Westminster leader Nigel Dodds said: "If the prime minister brings the withdrawal bill to the Commons for a vote, the question will be, 'What has changed?'.

"Unless she can demonstrate something new that addresses the problem of the backstop, then it is highly likely her deal will go down to defeat once again."

The backstop is the controversial part of the withdrawal deal that aims to ensure an open border on the island of Ireland if the UK leaves the EU without securing an all-encompassing deal.

It's not exactly the same thumbs up or thumbs down that another meaningful vote would be. That is a straightforward yes or no to the divorce deal that the prime minister negotiated with the EU.

This time, it will be the Withdrawal Bill which is a whole tome of new laws that will be needed to take us out of the European Union.

The draft of that bill is still being kept under wraps. Very, very few people have seen it. It's much more detailed than just a vote on the agreement would be.

Of course, that gives people more things to object to.

Although Theresa May might have pleaded in cabinet that people on all sides have to move away from absolutism, and move to a mood of compromise, there's not much sign of it.

As and when that bill actually emerges, that may well - in the words of one cabinet minister - make things worse before they can get better.

What is the Withdrawal Agreement Bill?

The UK needs to pass a law to implement the withdrawal agreement - the part of the PM's Brexit deal which will take the country out of the EU - in UK law.

This is a requirement under the terms of previous Brexit legislation passed last year.

The legislation would make the citizens' rights part of the agreement directly enforceable in UK courts, and set their relationship with the EU's Court of Justice.

It will also allow ministers to make "divorce payments" to the EU foreseen under the current deal, and give effect to the so-called backstop plan for the Irish border.

MPs will be able to vote on amendments to the bill, and this could allow ministers to make good on any compromise they reach with Labour in the cross-party talks.

If the bill is introduced in the first week of June it will come seven days after the European Parliament elections - which Education Secretary Damian Hinds has acknowledged could be "difficult" for the Conservatives.

A state visit by US President Donald Trump and a by-election in Peterborough will also take place that same week.

Please upgrade your browser

Your guide to Brexit jargon

Use the list below or select a button

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-48275827

2019-05-15 02:05:36Z
52780296193105