Sabtu, 31 Agustus 2019

These Are the Geekiest UK Cities According to an Infographic - GeekTyrant

Are you a geek in the United Kingdom? Well, you may want to hang out with some other geeks and thanks to the finance blog Onward, you can now know the best places in the UK to meet geeks of similar interests. The blog looked at 20 of the biggest cities in the UK and looked at how friendly they were to different kinds of geeks. The categories of geeks were comic book, video game, board game, convention, book, movie, and music/record geek. They looked at how many hotspots for each category (such as a comic book store, game store, convention, theater, etc.) and put that per 100,000 people. You can check out the infographics below, but the gist is the following list of which cities reign supreme for each category:

  • Comic Book Stores: Londonberry (2.22)

  • Video Game Stores: Lisburn (2.82)

  • Board Game Stores: Aberdeen (1.43)

  • Comic Conventions: Swansea (0.67)

  • Book Stores: Edinburgh (4.76)

  • Cinemas: Londonberry (3.33)

  • Record Stores: Bristol (2.24)

Of course, the data will be a little flawed as I’m sure there are other hotspots such as board game cafes that could’ve been taken into account as well. However, this is still pretty cool to look at. What do UK citizens think?

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://geektyrant.com/news/these-are-the-geekiest-uk-cities-according-to-an-infographic

2019-08-31 13:00:00Z
CBMiWGh0dHBzOi8vZ2Vla3R5cmFudC5jb20vbmV3cy90aGVzZS1hcmUtdGhlLWdlZWtpZXN0LXVrLWNpdGllcy1hY2NvcmRpbmctdG8tYW4taW5mb2dyYXBoaWPSAQA

10 of the UK's best railway cycle paths - The Guardian

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

10 of the UK's best railway cycle paths  The Guardian

Former railway lines up and down the country now offer great, family-friendly off-road cycle trails – and some even go up and down a bit.


https://www.theguardian.com/travel/2019/aug/31/top-10-former-railway-cycle-tracks-uk

2019-08-31 06:00:00Z
CAIiENj6zYW1xysu-mAjeom2A6kqFggEKg4IACoGCAowl6p7MN-zCTCw3Gc

Kamis, 29 Agustus 2019

Trump may regret meddling in UK Brexit negotiations | TheHill - The Hill

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson threw cat among the pigeons Wednesday by asking the queen to prorogue parliament until October 14.

Proroguing (suspending) parliament until October 14 will leave barely three days for a parliamentary Brexit debate before the all-important European Summit on October 17. That summit will be the last chance for the UK to secure a Brexit deal before Johnson’s self-imposed October 31 deadline for the United Kingdom to leave Europe with or without a deal.

Judging by the opposition’s hostile reaction to his bold political move, Johnson’s initiative is likely to usher in a prolonged period of political uncertainty. That will not be good for a weakened UK economy. It also comes at a bad time for the European economy, which already is having to cope with a German economy that is now in recession and an Italy which is in the throes of yet another political crisis.

ADVERTISEMENT

While UK politics is now in the greatest degree of flux, Johnson’s move would seem to have narrowed the its path forward to two seemingly unattractive options.

The first is that the UK will indeed crash out of Europe without a deal on October 31. Heightening that possibility is the unlikelihood that the European Commission will now offer Johnson any substantive changes to the Brexit deal that it negotiated with Johnson's predecessor, Theresa MayTheresa Mary MayBoris Johnson: Brexit chances 'touch and go' Trump promises 'very big trade deal' with Britain post-Brexit Here are the US allies that have been caught in Trump's crosshairs MORE. In particular, it is unlikely to drop its insistence on the Irish backstop, which is one of Johnson’s redlines. Fearing the precedent that it might set for other European Union members, the commission will not want to be seen to be caving in to Johnson’s Brexit brinksmanship.

The second possibility is that next week parliament will either succeed in passing legislation to force Johnson to ask the Europeans for an extension of the October 31 deadline or succeed in bringing down Johnson’s government by a no-confidence vote. It would seem that under either of these two scenarios Johnson would be forced to have early elections.

The Bank of England and the IMF have indicated that if the UK were to crash out of Europe without a deal, within a year or two UK output could be as much as 5 percent below where it otherwise would have been. This view is echoed by most mainstream economic forecasters. It is also basically shared by the UK business community, which is imploring Johnson not to risk a no-deal Brexit.

While forcing Johnson to seek an extension of the October 31 deadline or else by successfully passing a no-confidence vote, parliament might spare the country from the worst-case economic scenario. But it would not be without considerable risks.

ADVERTISEMENT

Early elections might usher in a far-left Jeremy Corbyn government that would take the country back to the failed policies of the 1970s. Alternatively it might see Boris Johnson winning that election on a hard-Brexit platform. That in turn only will have delayed by a few months the UK’s crashing out of Europe with all of its negative consequences.

To its great discredit, the Trump administration has been egging Johnson on to leave Europe without a deal. It has done so by making him the illusory promise of a speedy U.S.-UK free trade deal on the most favorable of terms for the UK.

Sadly, the chances are now high that the Trump administration will get the hard-Brexit that it has been wanting. But the chances are also very high that the Trump administration will come to regret its role in engineering that outcome. It will do so when it sees the immediate damage that a hard-Brexit will do to the UK and the negative spillover effects that a hard UK economic landing will have on a global economy that is already slowing down markedly.

Desmond Lachman is a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. He was formerly a deputy director in the International Monetary Fund's Policy Development and Review Department and the chief emerging market economic strategist at Salomon Smith Barney.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://thehill.com/opinion/international/459189-trump-may-regret-meddling-in-uk-brexit-negotiations

2019-08-29 11:30:12Z
52780365331487

Brexit Is The Latest Blow To The British Pound, Once A Symbol Of Economic Might - NPR

The pound was long the symbol of Britain's economic might. The chaos surrounding the country's 2016 decision to leave the European Union has sent the currency falling sharply. WPA Pool/Getty Images hide caption

toggle caption
WPA Pool/Getty Images

The British pound sterling is the oldest currency still in use in the world, dating to the time when Britain was little more than a collection of warring fiefdoms regularly plundered by Vikings.

Since its first use in the eighth century, the pound has survived revolutions and world wars, the industrial age and Thatcherism, and today it remains a powerful reminder of the glory days of the British empire.

But over the years, the pound has lost a lot of its luster, and in the wake of the Brexit turmoil, some economists believe it will only keep losing value.

For Britain, the pound is a rich cultural symbol. Pound notes have been adorned with pictures of the most illustrious figures in British history, including William Shakespeare, Jane Austen, Winston Churchill and Charles Darwin.

The pound's place in British culture became apparent during the debate over the euro in the late 1990s. The nations of Europe were about to give up their francs, deutsche marks and lire in favor of a new currency they hoped would unite the continent in peace and prosperity and solidify its political and economic power.

Tourists would no longer have to exchange money each time they visited a new country. Businesses could trade freely across borders, without worrying about currency fluctuations.

Only Britain balked at the change.

"We will not seek membership of the single currency on 1st January 1999," then-Chancellor of the Exchequer Gordon Brown told Parliament.

Today, the U.K.'s decision to stick with the pound — also known as sterling or, more colloquially, the quid — is seen by many economists as a prudent move, one that helped Britain recover faster after the Great Recession.

But Britain's decision was driven as much by culture as economics.

"We're a very proud nation. Used to rule the waves," says British businessman Cliff Franklin, who lives in New York. "And the pound is dear to British people's hearts. And I'm sure it would have been a cultural nightmare to try to get rid of it and go into the euro."

Throughout its history, as Britain's power grew, so too did the importance of its currency.

During the reign of Queen Victoria, Britain became a major commercial and industrial center. British capital financed railroads in India and Australia, shipping ports in Asia and cotton plantations in the United States. The pound itself could be used to buy and sell anywhere on Earth.

"If you go back to the 19th century, the British pound occupied the place in the global economy that the U.S. dollar does today," says Niall Ferguson, a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution and the author of The Ascent of Money.

But the 20th century, with its two world wars, saw a slow, gradual decline in Britain's power and a commensurate drop in the value of the pound.

"It's difficult to maintain a dominant currency if you put yourself through a world war as costly and destructive as World War I was for Britain," Ferguson says.

"The empire is no more," says economist Rex McKenzie of Kingston University in London. "The influence of the country has declined, and that is being reflected in the ... exchange rate."

One of the most dramatic chapters in the pound's long decline was known as Black Wednesday.

On Sept. 16, 1992, deep-pocketed investors led by George Soros made huge bets against the pound, ultimately driving down its value. Soros is said to have made more than $1 billion that day.

Before then, the pound was pegged to a basket of European currencies; afterward, the government was forced to let the pound float freely in currency markets.

Having an independent currency was a big advantage after the financial collapse of 2008, giving the Bank of England more flexibility to respond to a fast-moving crisis.

"The problem with the euro was that the policies that helped Germany weren't necessarily the ones that were right for Greece or Spain or Italy or other places," says Dartmouth College economist David Blanchflower.

Having an independent central bank "turned out to be a smart thing, and having a currency that you could depreciate was a really big deal," says Blanchflower, who sat on Britain's equivalent of the Federal Reserve committee that sets interest rates.

Britain has tried often over the years to prop up the pound, with diminishing success.

"My childhood was in some ways scarred by periodic sterling crises," Ferguson says. "I think they were my introduction to economics as a boy growing up in Britain."

Loading...

Don't see the graphic above? Click here.

More recently, the government's chronic inability to come up with a Brexit plan has sent the pound tumbling to a record low against the dollar, notes Simon Johnson, former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund.

When Britain voted to leave the European Union in 2016, the pound was worth nearly $1.50. Since then it has steadily lost value and trades today at just above $1.20. Many economists think it could soon reach parity with the dollar, something that would be unprecedented.

A drop in value is something of a mixed bag for the pound. It makes imported products more expensive inside the country, buy it also helps British companies compete by driving down the price of the goods they sell abroad.

Still, the pound's steady decline underscores the shifting fortunes of Britain itself and its diminished place in a global economy dominated by the United States and, increasingly, China.

How much further can it fall? Johnson doesn't want to hazard a guess. While the British economy is "running at a fairly decent clip right now," he says, confidence in Britain's ability to manage its departure from the European Union is waning.

"It depends, really, on how disruptive the Brexit developments are and precisely how that affects British trade," Johnson says.

Dartmouth's Blanchflower says the ongoing Brexit fiasco could send the pound's value falling below that of the euro or the U.S. dollar, something that's never happened before.

"The chaos that sits around a possible no-deal Brexit is scaring the markets," he says. "And so the pound is falling steadily."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.npr.org/2019/08/29/755014398/like-the-empire-itself-the-british-pound-is-not-what-it-used-to-be

2019-08-29 11:07:00Z
52780367493224

Collapse us if you can, British government dares Brexit opponents - Reuters

LONDON (Reuters) - Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s government on Thursday challenged opponents of Brexit in parliament to collapse the government or change the law if they wanted to thwart Britain’s exit from the European Union.

A pro-Brexit supporter carries a banner during an anti-Brexit protest, outside the Houses of Parliament in London, Britain August 28, 2019. REUTERS/Henry Nicholls

More than three years since the Brexit referendum, the United Kingdom is heading toward its gravest constitutional crisis in decades and a showdown with the EU over Brexit due in just 63 days time.

In his boldest step since becoming prime minister last month, Johnson enraged opponents of a no-deal Brexit on Wednesday by ordering the suspension of parliament for almost a month.

The speaker of the lower house of parliament, John Bercow, said that was a constitutional outrage as it limited the time the 800-year-old heart of English democracy has to debate and shape the course of British history.

But Jacob Rees-Mogg, the Brexit supporter who is in charge of managing government business in parliament, dared opponents to do their worst.

“All these people who are wailing and gnashing of teeth know that there are two ways of doing what they want to do,” Rees-Mogg told the BBC.

“One, is to change the government and the other is to change the law. If they do either of those that will then have an effect.

“If they don’t have either the courage or the gumption to do either of those then we will leave on the 31st of October in accordance with the referendum result.”

Johnson’s move to suspend parliament for longer than usual at one of the most crucial junctures in recent British history was cheered by U.S. President Donald Trump but provoked criticism from some British lawmakers and media.

“Boris Johnson’s suspension of parliament is an affront to democracy,” The Financial Times said in an editorial.

TORTUOUS NEGOTIATIONS

After years of tortuous negotiations and a series of political crises since the United Kingdom voted 52% to 48% to leave the EU in the 2016 referendum, Brexit remains up in the air. Options range from an acrimonious divorce on Oct. 31 and an election to an amicable exit or even another referendum.

In effect, Johnson’s order to suspend parliament forces opponents of a no-deal Brexit in parliament to show their hand and act in as few as four days sitting next month. Parliament returns from its summer holiday on Sept. 3.

An election is likely.

“Boris is obviously preparing for an election,” said Conservative lawmaker Ken Clarke.

“He’s decided that he wants a people versus foreigners election, and a people versus parliament election, and he’s blustering away with ‘making this country the greatest country in the world’, patriotism, Donald Trump-style stuff.”

Johnson is also trying to convince the EU that his threat of a no-deal exit is real.

Britain’s opposition Labour Party will seek an emergency debate on Brexit next week, the party’s trade spokesman Barry Gardiner said, outlining plans which could give them an opening to pass legislation to block a no-deal Brexit.

Slideshow (2 Images)

“On Monday, we will introduce what is known as a Standing Order Section 24 Motion and that would be to try and have an emergency debate,” Gardiner told Sky News.

There is a small majority against a no-deal Brexit in the 650-seat House of Commons though it is unclear if opponents of Johnson within the Conservative Party would collapse his government in a vote of no confidence.

Editing by Janet Lawrence

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.reuters.com/article/us-britain-eu-idUSKCN1VJ0JX

2019-08-29 06:36:00Z
52780365331487

Rabu, 28 Agustus 2019

Boris Johnson asks Queen to suspend UK Parliament ahead of Brexit: Live updates - CNN International

Boris Johnson's decision has sparked outrage because it makes a no-deal Brexit more likely. Experts have been warning that scenario would have major implications, because the UK's membership in the European Union touches on almost every aspect of the country's economy.

Here are some potential problems:

  • Trade disruption

EU membership allows British businesses to trade freely across the bloc, without the need to have extra permits or pay tariffs.

If the UK crashes out without a deal, that link will be severed abruptly and businesses will face extra costs. Business lobby groups say these could be too much for some companies, which may not survive. If companies start collapsing, jobs will disappear and the economy will suffer.

  • Food and medicines shortages

A no-deal Brexit would likely mean new checks at the borders, which could delay imports. For some products border delays could prove catastrophic -- fresh fruit and other foodstuffs could rot while stuck in lorry queues.

Medical supplies coming from Europe could be affected too, because of extra red tape. French drugmaker Sanofi and its Swiss rival Novartis said they would stockpile key medicines ahead of Brexit.

No-deal Brexit could cause food shortages.
No-deal Brexit could cause food shortages. Photo: Anna-Rose Gassot/AFP/Getty Images
  • Recession?

According to the government's own assessment published in November, leaving without a deal would result in the UK economy being 7.7% smaller 15 years after Brexit.

The damage would be even greater if net migration from the European Union substantially dropped, the government said.

  • Farming problems

The UK is a major agricultural exporter and the National Farmers' Union had warned that a no-deal scenario would be devastating for the sector. Up to 65% of Britain's agriculture exports go to the EU.

  • Border delays

A study by Imperial College in London found that two extra minutes spent checking each vehicle, be it at the ferry port in Dover in southern England, or the Eurotunnel terminal nearby, could translate to jams of up to 29 miles.

Read a full overview of the risks of no-deal Brexit here.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnn.com/europe/live-news/brexit-parliament-suspension-gbr-intl/index.html

2019-08-28 19:17:00Z
52780365331487

Brexit shock as UK PM asks Queen to suspend Parliament: Live updates - CNN International

Opponents of a no-deal Brexit just got royally outflanked.

Boris Johnson’s wheeze of getting the Queen to order a five-week suspension of Parliament means his critics have much less time than they thought to prevent the UK leaving the European Union without a deal on October 31.

Before today, their preferred option was to pass a law requiring the government to seek an extension to the Brexit deadline and hold a second referendum, should negotiations with the EU fail to result in a deal.

But with Parliament due to return from its annual summer break on September 3, they now have just four days to engineer the required legislation before Johnson’s suspension takes effect.

That could force them to fall back on Plan B – a vote of no-confidence in the government. The trouble is, for that to succeed, they need Conservative lawmakers to vote against their own party, which was always going to be a tall order.

In any event, a new parliamentary session will begin on October 14 with the traditional State Opening of Parliament and Queen’s Speech, when the monarch reads out a text written by Downing Street that sets out the government’s legislative priorities. That’s typically followed by several days of parliamentary debate. And while Johnson has hitherto been happy to tear up the norms of British political life, this is a tradition that will suit him very well.

An EU Council summit is due to take place on October 17 and 18. If Johnson returns from this event brandishing a new Brexit deal, he will hope to ram it through Parliament in the two weeks left until Brexit day. And after that? A swift general election, riding the wave of Brexit triumph, to cement his authority?

But if negotiations with the EU fail and Johnson sets a path to no-deal, things could look very different. The trouble for his opponents is that, by this point, their room for maneuver would be severely limited.

Even if they could muster enough support to pass a vote of no confidence, UK law sets out a two-week window for a new government to be formed, or a general election to be called. Meanwhile, the Brexit countdown clock would continue to tick.

Opponents of Brexit are already denouncing Johnson’s machinations as a constitutional outrage and are planning a parliamentary showdown next week.

Johnson however, seems very pleased with himself, pointing out that Parliament will be sitting in the run-up to Brexit and the whole affair is perfectly in order, given that his predecessor, Theresa May, had allowed the previous parliamentary session to drag on.

Whatever happens, it’s clear that next week will be very bumpy indeed ­– and, as ever with Brexit, only the rashest of pundits would attempt to predict the outcome with any degree of certainty. Time to buckle up.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnn.com/europe/live-news/brexit-parliament-suspension-gbr-intl/index.html

2019-08-28 10:56:00Z
52780365331487

Selasa, 27 Agustus 2019

Iran jails two, including UK dual national, for spying for Israel - Aljazeera.com

Iran has jailed two people including a British dual national for 10 years for spying for Israel and another two years for receiving illegal payments, the judiciary said on Tuesday.

Anousheh Ashouri, a woman with British and Iranian citizenship, got 10 years in prison for feeding information to Israel's Mossad spy agency, the judiciary's Mizan Online website quoted judiciary spokesman Gholamhossein Esmaili as saying on Tuesday.

She was also handed a two-year prison sentence for receiving 33,000 euros ($36,600) in illicit funds from Israel and ordered to pay the same amount in fines.

The United Kingdom's Foreign & Commonwealth Office (FCO) said it was supporting the family of Ashouri following the ruling.

"Our Embassy in Tehran continues to request consular access," an FCO spokesman said in a statement.

"The treatment of all dual nationals detained in Iran is a priority and we raise their cases at the most senior levels. We urge Iran to let them be reunited with their families," the spokesman added.

Ali Johari, an Iranian national, was also sentenced to 10 years in prison for various espionage offences, including "widespread connections with Mossad... and meeting with various elements linked to the Zionists," Esmaili said, quoted by the judiciary's website.

Johari had been in contact with operatives in India, Laos and Sri Lanka, among other countries, and also travelled to "occupied lands", the judiciary added.

He had been in the process of "getting citizenship from this country", said Esmaili, in apparent reference to Israel.

Johari also received two years for accepting illicit funds and was ordered to pay that unspecified amount in fines, said Esmaili.

'Cultural infiltration'

Separately on Tuesday, Esmaili also confirmed that an Iranian appeals court had upheld a 10-year jail sentence against British Council employee Aras Amiri for "cultural infiltration", adding the latter was "already serving her term".

"This person... was identified by us because of her cultural infiltration in society through arts and her widespread activities," he added.

London-based Amiri was arrested in Iran in 2018 during a trip to visit relatives in the country.

Mizan Online reported her original sentence on May 13, saying she had "made a straightforward confession" after being arrested by Iranian intelligence and security agencies "more than a year ago".

At the time, Esmaili said she had been tasked with drawing up and managing cultural "infiltration" projects.

Reacting to the May announcement, the FCO said it was "very concerned" by the case.

The British Council is a cultural and educational organisation with branches around the world. 

190513140136500

Funding from the FCO makes up about 15 percent of its overall income.

According to the organisation's website, it is not "physically present" in Iran.

Iranian authorities shut down the British Council more than a decade ago for what Esmaili described as "illegal activities".

British-Iranian tensions

The developments came amid heightened tensions between Iran and Britain, a major US ally, with the pair recently embroiled in a bitter spat over the seizure of two oil tankers.

An Iranian tanker was seized off the British overseas territory of Gibraltar on July 4 on suspicion of shipping oil to Syria in breach of EU sanctions.

That vessel was later released, but Iran continues to hold a British-flagged tanker it seized in the Strait of Hormuz on July 19 for allegedly breaking "international maritime rules".

Tensions had already been strained between the two sides over the fate of British-Iranian mother Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe who was arrested by Iranian authorities in 2016 as she was leaving Tehran.

190826144429638

Zaghari-Ratcliffe, a 41-year-old Thomson Reuters Foundation employee, was later put on trial and is now serving a five-year jail sentence for allegedly trying to topple the Iranian government.

She has frequently denied the sedition charge levelled against her, insisting she was in the country on a family visit with her daughter.    

According to Human Rights Watch (HRW), Iran has arrested at least 14 dual or foreign nationals since 2014, many of whom HRW said had been charged by courts of "cooperating with a 'hostile state'" without sufficient evidence.

"This targeted campaign against foreign and dual nationals sends a threatening message to Iranian expatriates and foreigners interested in working in Iran, that their knowledge and expertise are a liability if they visit the country," HRW's Middle East Director Sarah Leah Whiston said in September 2018.

"Iran's security apparatus has apparently made the despicable decision to use these individuals as bargaining chips to resolve diplomatic disputes," she added.

Iran does not recognise dual nationality and arrests of Iranians accused of espionage has increased since the Islamic Republic's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said last year there had been "infiltration" by Western agents in the country.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2019/08/iran-court-upholds-british-council-employee-10-year-jail-term-190827082404755.html

2019-08-27 10:22:00Z
CBMieWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmFsamF6ZWVyYS5jb20vbmV3cy8yMDE5LzA4L2lyYW4tY291cnQtdXBob2xkcy1icml0aXNoLWNvdW5jaWwtZW1wbG95ZWUtMTAteWVhci1qYWlsLXRlcm0tMTkwODI3MDgyNDA0NzU1Lmh0bWzSAX1odHRwczovL3d3dy5hbGphemVlcmEuY29tL2FtcC9uZXdzLzIwMTkvMDgvaXJhbi1jb3VydC11cGhvbGRzLWJyaXRpc2gtY291bmNpbC1lbXBsb3llZS0xMC15ZWFyLWphaWwtdGVybS0xOTA4MjcwODI0MDQ3NTUuaHRtbA

Senin, 26 Agustus 2019

Five Questions Prince Andrew Still Has To Answer About Jeffrey Epstein - Daily Beast

If you love The Daily Beast’s royal coverage, then we hope you’ll enjoy The Royalist, a members-only series for Beast Inside. Become a member to get it in your inbox on Sunday.

Prince Andrew’s Saturday statement didn’t answer this

Prince Andrew’s strategy for dealing with the fallout of the suicide of his chum, billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, is now becoming clear: minimize, deny, plead ignorance, and avoid answering specific questions.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.thedailybeast.com/five-questions-prince-andrew-still-has-to-answer-about-jeffrey-epstein

2019-08-26 08:32:00Z
52780362917197

Minggu, 25 Agustus 2019

Five Questions Prince Andrew Still Has To Answer About Jeffrey Epstein - Daily Beast

If you love The Daily Beast’s royal coverage, then we hope you’ll enjoy The Royalist, a members-only series for Beast Inside. Become a member to get it in your inbox on Sunday.

Prince Andrew’s Saturday statement didn’t answer this

Prince Andrew’s strategy for dealing with the fallout of the suicide of his chum, billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein is now becoming clear; minimize, deny, plead ignorance, and avoid answering specific questions.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.thedailybeast.com/five-questions-prince-andrew-still-has-to-answer-about-jeffrey-epstein

2019-08-25 12:01:00Z
52780362917197

Trump meets with Britain's Boris Johnson, promises 'very big trade deal' between US, UK after Brexit - Fox News

The U.S. and Britain will work out a “very big trade deal” once the U.K. has left the European Union, President Trump said Sunday morning in France, where Trump and other leaders have gathered for the G-7 summit.

The president also praised new British Prime Minister Boris Johnson on Brexit during their working breakfast on the second day of the summit.

"He needs no advice. He's the right man for the job,” Trump said.

The president appeared to slight former Prime Minister Theresa May – who he had frequently criticized – by adding that Johnson is “a new person.”

TRUMP TALKS UP ‘SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP’ WITH MACRON, HOURS AFTER THREAT TO SLAP TARIFFS ON FRENCH WINE

U.S. President Donald Trump, left, and Britain's Prime Minister Boris Johnson attend a working breakfast at the Hotel du Palais on the sidelines of the G-7 summit in Biarritz, France, Sunday, Aug. 25, 2019. (Associated Press)

U.S. President Donald Trump, left, and Britain's Prime Minister Boris Johnson attend a working breakfast at the Hotel du Palais on the sidelines of the G-7 summit in Biarritz, France, Sunday, Aug. 25, 2019. (Associated Press)

Johnson, meanwhile, congratulated Trump on his handling of the U.S. economy, but added, “just to register a faint, sheeplike note of our view on the trade war, we're in favor of trade peace on the whole."

Johnson had told British reporters before the meeting that he would ask Trump not to escalate the U.S. trade hostilities with China.

Sunday's meeting was their first since Johnson succeeded May as prime minister in July.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Earlier Sunday, Trump told reporters "we're getting along well right now with China,” despite a new round of tariffs on Chinese goods Friday and saying that U.S. businesses are “hereby ordered” to leave China.

In retaliation, China has promised to impose new tariffs on $75 billion in U.S. goods.

The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-says-us-and-uk-will-have-very-big-trade-deal-post-brexit

2019-08-25 08:04:42Z
52780361048022

Sabtu, 24 Agustus 2019

Boris Johnson warns Trump US must compromise to get UK trade deal - BBC News

The US must lift restrictions on UK businesses if it wants a trade deal with the UK, Boris Johnson has said.

Travelling to the G7 summit in Biarritz, France, the PM said there were "very considerable barriers in the US to British businesses".

Mr Johnson said he had already spoken to President Donald Trump about his concerns, adding he would do so again when they meet on Sunday morning.

The prime minister will also hold talks with EU Council President Donald Tusk.

"There are massive opportunities for UK companies to open up, to prise open the American market," Mr Johnson said.

"We intend to seize those opportunities but they are going to require our American friends to compromise and to open up their approach, because currently there are too many restrictions."

Offering an example of a restriction, Mr Johnson said: "Melton Mowbray pork pies, which are sold in Thailand and in Iceland, are currently unable to enter the US market because of, I don't know, some sort of food and drug administration restriction."

He continued: "UK bell peppers cannot get into the US market at all.

"Wine shipments are heavily restricted. If you want to export wine made in England to the US you have to go through a US distributor.

"There is a tax on British micro-breweries in the US that doesn't apply to US micro-breweries in the UK."

Last month, President Trump said talks about a "very substantial" trade deal with the UK were already under way.

He said a bilateral post-Brexit deal could lead to a "three to four, five times" increase in current trade - but provided no details about how that would be achieved.

However, the Speaker of the US House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi, said a UK-US trade deal would not get through Congress if Brexit undermined the Good Friday Agreement.

Ms Pelosi said the UK's exit from the EU could not be allowed to endanger the 1998 Irish peace deal, which the US helped facilitate.

What is a trade deal?

Trade deals involve two or more countries agreeing a set of terms by which they buy and sell goods and services from each other.

Deals are designed to increase trade by eliminating or reducing trade barriers. These barriers might include import or export taxes (tariffs), quotas, or differing regulations on things such as safety or labelling.

Mr Johnson also discussed the possibility of a tax on internet giants, following the French government's decision to approve a digital services tax despite threats of retaliation by the US.

"Frankly, we must do something to tax fairly and properly the online businesses that have such colossal sales in our country," he told reporters. "We must do something to ensure we tax them properly.

"I am open to discussion about how we do that and I am willing to listen to our American friends about the modalities but we must do something to tax them fairly."

Media playback is unsupported on your device

Earlier on Saturday, Mr Johnson and Mr Tusk clashed over who would be responsible for a no-deal Brexit.

Mr Tusk said Mr Johnson risked being remembered as "Mr No Deal" - but the PM responded by saying it was Mr Tusk who would become "Mr No-Deal Brexit".

Mr Johnson has repeatedly stated he would prefer to leave the EU with a deal on 31 October, but insists the backstop - the insurance policy designed to avoid a hard border on the island of Ireland - must be removed from the withdrawal agreement.

"I've made it absolutely clear I don't want no deal, and that we've got to get rid of the backstop from the treaty, and if Mr Tusk doesn't want to go down as Mr No-Deal Brexit, I hope that point will be borne in mind too," Mr Johnson said.

Mr Tusk said the EU would listen to any suggestions from the UK on Brexit - as long as they were "operational, realistic and acceptable to all EU member states".

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-49462613

2019-08-24 21:32:06Z
52780361048022

UK PM Johnson to tell Trump to de-escalate trade tensions - Reuters

BIARRITZ, France (Reuters) - British Prime Minister Boris Johnson said on Saturday he would tell President Donald Trump at this weekend’s G7 summit to pull back from a trade war that is already destabilizing economic growth around the world.

Johnson and Trump are due to meet on Sunday morning for what are expected to be positive talks on their countries’ future bilateral trade relations and Brexit, as well as covering international topics where the two sides do not see eye to eye, like Russia, the Iran nuclear deal and trade policy on China.

Asked if he would be telling Trump he should not escalate the trade war with China, Johnson said “you bet”.

Speaking to reporters on arrival in the southwestern French city of Biarritz, Johnson said one of his priorities for the summit was “clearly the state of global trade. I am very worried about the way it’s going, the growth of protectionism, of tariffs that we’re seeing”.

A year-long trade war between the United States and China, the world’s two largest economies, has roiled financial markets and shaken the global economy. The dispute worsened just ahead of the summit with Washington and Beijing announcing further tariffs.

“Don’t forget that the UK is at risk of being implicated in this,” Johnson said.

“This is not the way to proceed. Apart from everything else, those who support the tariffs are at risk of incurring the blame for the downturn in the global economy, irrespective of whether or not that is true.

“I want to see an opening up of global trade, I want to see a dialing down of tensions and I want to see tariffs come off.”

Reporting by William James; Editing by Andrew Heavens and Frances Kerry

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.reuters.com/article/us-g7-summit-johnson-trump/uk-pm-johnson-to-tell-trump-to-de-escalate-trade-tensions-idUSKCN1VE0HH

2019-08-24 13:39:00Z
52780361048022

Jumat, 23 Agustus 2019

'World's first' solar-powered rail line opens in the UK - Engadget

Sponsored Links

Andrew Aitchison via Getty Images

Some trains in the UK are now running on a rail line powered entirely by a solar farm in what's said to be a world first. Around 100 panels are keeping the signaling and lights up and running on the track near Aldershot in Hampshire, and the project could be a precursor to solar-powered trains on the nation's network.

Several UK train stations already run on solar. Network Rail, which manages most of the railway infrastructure on the British mainland, has earmarked billions of pounds to electrify rail lines, and aims to do so with solar power if the pilot project is successful. The UK government aims to eliminate the use of diesel on the rail network by 2040.

Those behind the solar project told the Guardian the renewable energy could power 20 percent of the Liverpool Merseyrail network and 15 percent of commuter lines in Kent, Sussex and Wessex as well as solar trains in Edinburgh, Glasgow, Nottingham, London and Manchester. Along with being a greener form of power than diesel, the solar farms could supply cheaper power than electricity from the natural grid, which would reduce costs for railways.

The UK wouldn't be the first country to have solar-powered trains. More than 250 are in service in India with panels on their roofs. The subcontinent plans to establish trackside solar farms and Indian Railways hopes to have the first entirely green railway network in 10 years. Meanwhile, some UK trains are being refitted to run on hydrogen tanks and fuel cells.

All products recommended by Engadget are selected by our editorial team, independent of our parent company. Some of our stories include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, we may earn an affiliate commission.
Comment
Comments
Share
41 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share
Save

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.engadget.com/2019/08/23/solar-power-rail-line-uk-renewable/

2019-08-23 17:55:04Z
52780361716593

Taylor Swift (Eventually) Beats Pitchfork - Washington Examiner

The first album written by Taylor Swift that was ever deemed respectable enough for Pitchfork to review was performed by Ryan Adams. The music blog gave the 1989 cover album by the since disgraced rocker a 4/10. No matter that Swift, who earned her first of 32 Grammy nominations over a decade ago, and became the youngest Album of the Year winner while still a teenager, has spent more than half her lifetime becoming one of the most prolific and successful singer-songwriters of all time. It’s only now that Pitchfork has decided that Swift’s career is worth considering as part of a serious canon of modern music.

Pitchfork began with a focus on independent music, and if the site simply ignored pop and country altogether, the absence of Swift from its reviews wouldn't have registered on any cultural Richter scale. But the same year that Pitchfork was reviewing Adams' cover, they reviewed Purpose by Justin Bieber. The Canadian crooner barely even wrote it. If Pitchfork wanted to reward artists who don't just perform but also create their own craft, it made no sense for them to validate Purpose, which required dozens of writers, and not any album by Swift, who's been writing her chart-toppers on her own since her debut album at age 16.

Pitchfork finally came around to reviewing the original 1989 as well as the rest of her oeuvre retrospectively, nearly two years after describing Reputation as "sadly conventional" in its first review of a Swift album. It only took Swift selling as many records as Whitney Houston and the Rolling Stones for them to do it.

"Back then," writes Maura Johnson at the blog of Swift's debut, "she had doubters."

Chief among them, the self-ordained tastemakers of the music industry. Pitchfork seems to have changed its tune on Swift, though, recognizing Joni Mitchell's influence on the singer's dexterous writing and artistic evolution, albeit with slight digs at Swift's "squeaky clean" image.

Swift, of course, would have the last laugh regardless of whether or not Pitchfork decided to cave. The site will be shuttered behind a paywall by the year's end. But still, four years after granting credence to the Adams cover, they finally covered 1989. They gave it a 7.7.

—By Tiana Lowe

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/taylor-swift-eventually-beats-pitchfork

2019-08-23 03:00:00Z
52780359872538

Kamis, 22 Agustus 2019

Keep calm and trust in free-market democracy: Hong Kong shows how America can defeat China - Washington Examiner

In our globalized economy, highly mobile capital works in favor of investors and consumers who value democratic protections. That dooms China's authoritarian model unless Beijing can force the world to submit to its peculiar form of feudal mercantilism.

Just look at Hong Kong.

Multiple reports on Thursday suggest that Alibaba, China's equivalent of Amazon, has suspended its plan to float shares on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange. That's just the tip of the iceberg. The head of Hong Kong-based Cathay Pacific Airways recently resigned, and the head of a subsidiary airline's union, Cathay Dragon, has been forced out. Qantas airlines is reducing flights to the Chinese territory, and Hong Kong's service economy is in free fall. The simple takeaway: Witnessing Hong Kong's battle between individual freedom and state authoritarianism, international businesses are turning away.

That Chinese weakness is America's opportunity. Our countermanding investment model: one that balances democratic protections and the rule-of-law to free-market capitalism is one that can attract those investors now disillusioned by Hong Kong. Defending against Chinese aggression and strengthening an investor-friendly stable economy, we can take advantage from China's economic isolation.

Still not convinced?

Then just look at the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (with my annotation). It has been spiraling downwards since the start of protests in April. Market stabilization has been impossible in face of oscillating protests.

Screen Shot 2019-08-22 at 1.39.22 PM (2).png

Again, this is Beijing caught between reality and ideology.

The reality is that people do not want to kneel in submission to Chinese President Xi Jinping in return for whatever scraps he throws at them. They prefer to earn profits under protection of democratic law. But because Xi's ideology is centered in a long-term project to reshape the world under Chinese rule, he cannot yield to the protesters, which further hurts China's investment appeal.

It's not just absent freedom which makes China weak. It's the very model that Xi pursues. Where free markets allocate capital based on objective assessments of a return, Xi burns capital at the altar of his all-knowing delusion. Xi and his cronies believe they know better than the invisible hand. They are manifestly wrong.

Still, America must not take for granted our great systemic comparative advantage over China. President Trump's cultivation of chaos over the Federal Reserve is extraordinarily misguided. So too is it alarming that Democratic presidential front-runners now deride free markets. We should refocus on that which makes us economically great: freedom matched to capitalism.

If we do, Hong Kong shows that we'll win this new struggle for the 21st century.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/keep-calm-and-trust-in-free-market-democracy-hong-kong-shows-how-america-can-defeat-china

2019-08-22 19:50:00Z
52780359734068

Selasa, 20 Agustus 2019

Britain concerned about consular employee missing in China - ABC News

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/britain-concerned-consular-employee-missing-china-65069966

2019-08-20 09:33:00Z
52780358263352

Minggu, 18 Agustus 2019

Jihadi Jack: IS recruit Jack Letts loses UK citizenship - BBC News

A Muslim convert who joined the Islamic State group as a teenager has had his British citizenship revoked, the BBC understands.

Jack Letts - nicknamed Jihadi Jack in the press - was 18 years old when he left school in Oxfordshire in 2014 to join IS fighters in Raqqa, Syria.

He was jailed after being captured by Kurdish YPG forces while attempting to flee to Turkey in May 2017.

The Home Office said it would not comment on individual cases.

Mr Letts converted to Islam when he was 16 and is a dual UK-Canadian national.

Former defence minister Tobias Ellwood has been critical of the government's decision to revoke Mr Letts' British citizenship.

In a statement, tweeted on Sunday, he said removing the radicalised fighter's citizenship "shunts the responsibility elsewhere" when many fighters were "radicalised here in the UK".

He added that Britain "should be leading calls" on how "foreign fighters face justice and who is ultimately responsible for bringing them to justice".

While the Home Office would not comment on the issue, a spokesman said: "Decisions on depriving a dual national of citizenship are based on substantial advice from officials, lawyers and the intelligence agencies and all available information.

"This power is one way we can counter the terrorist threat posed by some of the most dangerous individuals and keep our country safe."

He dropped out of studying for his A-levels at a school in Oxford in 2014 before moving to Syria and joining the so-called Islamic State - the jihadist terror group which became known worldwide for its brutal mass killings and beheadings.

In an interview with the BBC's Quentin Sommerville, Mr Letts said: "I know I was definitely an enemy of Britain."

After being pressed on why he left the UK to join the jihadist group, he said: "I thought I was leaving something behind and going to something better."

He told ITV News earlier this year that he wanted to return to the UK as he felt British - but understood it was unlikely he would be able to.

"I'm not going to say I'm innocent. I'm not innocent. I deserve what comes to me. But I just want it to be... appropriate... not just haphazard, freestyle punishment in Syria," he said at the time. .

Mr Letts's parents, John, 58, and Sally Lane, 57, were convicted in June this year of funding terrorism after sending their son £223.

The couple were sentenced to 15 months' imprisonment, suspended for 12 months, following an Old Bailey trial.

Under international law, a person can only be stripped of their citizenship by a government if it does not leave them stateless.

The decision to revoke Jack Letts of his citizenship is thought to be one of the last decisions made by Theresa May's government.

It comes after then-Home Secretary Sajid Javid stripped Shamima Begum of her UK citizenship earlier this year.

She was one of three girls from east London who left the UK in February 2015 and travelled to Syria, where she married an Islamic State group fighter.

Mr Javid said Ms Begum could claim Bangladeshi citizenship because of her family background.

But Bangladesh has said she is not a citizen and would not be allowed into the country.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-49385376

2019-08-18 12:40:07Z
52780356220444

Brexit: PM to tell EU leaders to renegotiate deal - BBC News

Boris Johnson will tell EU leaders there needs to be a new Brexit deal when he makes his first trip abroad as PM later this week.

The UK will leave the EU on 31 October with or without a deal, he will insist.

Meanwhile, the Sunday Times has printed leaked government documents warning of food, medicine and fuel shortages in a no-deal scenario.

A No 10 source told the BBC a former minister leaked the dossier to try to influence discussions with EU leaders.

The documents say the cross-government paper on preparations for a no-deal Brexit, codenamed Operation Yellowhammer, reveals the UK could face months of disruption at its ports.

It also states plans to avoid a hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland are unlikely to prove sustainable.

The dossier, reported by the Sunday Times, says leaving the EU without a deal could lead to:

  • Fresh food becoming less available and prices rising
  • A hard Irish border after plans to avoid checks fail, sparking protests
  • Fuel becoming less available and 2,000 jobs being lost if the government sets petrol import tariffs to 0%, potentially causing two oil refineries to close
  • UK patients having to wait longer for medicines, including insulin and flu vaccines
  • A rise in public disorder and community tensions resulting from a shortage of food and drugs
  • Passengers being delayed at EU airports, Eurotunnel and Dover
  • Freight disruption at ports lasting up to three months, caused by customs checks, before traffic flow improves to 50-70% of the current rate

The Downing Street source told the BBC the leaked document "is from when ministers were blocking what needed to be done to get ready to leave and the funds were not available".

Michael Gove, who is responsible for overseeing the devolution consequences of Brexit, said in a tweet that Operation Yellowhammer was "a worst case scenario".

"V significant steps have been taken in the last 3 weeks to accelerate Brexit planning," he added.

Energy Minister Kwasi Kwarteng told Sky News' Sophy Ridge on Sunday: "I think there's a lot of scaremongering around and a lot of people are playing into project fear."

'Completely insane'

But a former head of the British civil service, Lord Bob Kerslake, who described the document as "credible", said the dossier "lays bare the scale of the risks we are facing with no-deal Brexit in almost every area".

"These risks are completely insane for this country to be taking and we have to explore every avenue to avoid them," he told BBC Radio 4's Broadcasting House.

Irish deputy prime minister Simon Coveney said, in a tweet, that Ireland had "always been clear" a hard border in Ireland "must be avoided".

The Irish backstop - the provision in Theresa May's withdrawal agreement that could see Northern Ireland continue to follow some of the same trade rules as the Republic of Ireland and the rest of the EU, thus preventing a hard border - was an "insurance policy" designed to protect the peace process, he said.

Liberal Democrat MP Tom Brake said the leaked documents showed the effects of a no-deal Brexit should be taken more seriously.

"The government have simply, I think, pretended that this wasn't an issue," he said

The government was in "a real pickle", since the "the US has said that if that border is jeopardised, we're not going to get a trade deal with them", he said.

Speaker of the US House of Representatives Nancy Pelosi said, on Wednesday, a US-UK trade deal would not get through Congress if Brexit undermined the Good Friday Agreement.

G7 summit

The leak comes as the prime minister prepares to travel to Berlin to meet German Chancellor Angela Merkel on Wednesday, before going to Paris to meet French President Emmanuel Macron on Thursday.

Mr Johnson is expected to say Parliament cannot and will not change the outcome of the 2016 referendum and insist there must be a new deal to replace Mrs May's withdrawal agreement - defeated three times by MPs - if the UK is to leave the EU with a deal.

However, it is thought their discussions will chiefly focus on issues such as foreign policy, security, trade and the environment, ahead of the G7 summit next weekend.

Boris Johnson had been reluctant to fly to meet European leaders until it seemed a breakthrough was likely.

But - it still doesn't.

When Mr Johnson meets the EU's most powerful leaders - Angela Merkel and Emmanuel Macron - he will repeat his message that the UK is leaving, no matter what, at the end of October.

He will tell them face-to-face for the first time that the only way the UK will sign up to a deal is if the EU thinks again, and replaces the agreement brokered by Mrs May.

But there seems to be little chance of any serious progress in the coming days.

No 10 does not seem particularly optimistic and says it expects both sides will say their piece, then move on to other issues.

Anti-Brexit campaigner Gina Miller said the Government had "unequivocally" accepted it could not shut down Parliament to clear the way for a no-deal Brexit.

She told Sky's Sophy Ridge On Sunday: "What they have said is, unequivocally, they accept that to close down Parliament, to bypass them in terms of Brexit - stopping a no-deal Brexit, in particular - is illegal."

But Ms Miller said she would continue to seek further reassurances that MPs would be able to pass legislation to stop a no-deal Brexit.

Meanwhile, a cross-party group of more than 100 MPs has urged the prime minister to recall Parliament and let it sit permanently until the UK leaves the EU.

In a letter, MPs say the country is "on the brink of an economic crisis".

It continues: "Parliament must be recalled now in August and sit permanently until 31 October, so that the voices of the people can be heard, and that there can be proper scrutiny of your government."

Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has reiterated his call for MPs to work together to stop a no-deal Brexit.

Speaking to the Observer, Mr Corbyn said his plan to be installed as an interim prime minister was the "simplest and most democratic way to stop no deal".

The Labour leader has said, as a caretaker PM, he would delay Brexit, call a snap election, and campaign for another referendum.

But Lib Dem leader Jo Swinson said Mr Corbyn was "divisive" and instead suggested Conservative MP Ken Clarke or former Labour leader Harriet Harman could head a temporary government.

Elsewhere, in a letter seen by the Mail on Sunday, Mr Johnson warned rebel Tory MPs their opposition to a no-deal Brexit was damaging the prospect of getting a new deal.

He said it was "plain as a pikestaff" that the EU will "not compromise as long as they believe there is the faintest possibility that Parliament can block Brexit on 31 October".

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-49385263

2019-08-18 07:04:23Z
52780352760186

Jumat, 16 Agustus 2019

Folk Singer Wants to Reverse Britain's Last Imperial Conquest—a Rock - The Wall Street Journal

Rockall, an uninhabited rock in the Atlantic, is the subject of a song. Photo: Alamy

DERRYBEG, Ireland— Brian Warfield has promised to reverse Britain’s last act of imperial expansion, and claim the Atlantic island of Rockall for Ireland.

Rockall is an 80-foot wide, uninhabitable rock, battered by 50-foot waves. The nearest habitable land, Scotland, is around 230 miles away. Mr. Warfield is a 73-year-old Irish folk musician without a boat.

Tensions between Britain and Ireland are rising over the prospect of a no-deal Brexit. Fans of Mr. Warfield’s band, the Wolfe Tones, want him to make good on the pledge.

Philip Casey, 62, first read about Mr. Warfield’s promise in a newspaper.

“I thought, good on him,” he said, as he waited for the Wolfe Tones to hit the stage.

The U.K. annexed Rockall in 1955, in what London newspapers dubbed the last act of the Empire, to stop the Soviet Union using it to spy on British missile tests.

Though it doesn’t claim the rock as Irish, Dublin has never recognized British sovereignty, saying nobody should own the remote island. Nor has Mr. Warfield and his band, the Wolfe Tones, who first took up the cause in 1976 with the satirical song “Rock on Rockall.”

This June, as the Scottish government ordered Irish boats to stop fishing the squid-rich waters around Rockall, Mr. Warfield told a newspaper: “We’d be prepared to go up there in a trawler ourselves and claim the rock back for Ireland.”

Then the band went on a tour of the U.S. and Mr. Warfield mainly forgot about his promise.

Tommy Byrne and Brian Warfield looked over a song list in Derrybeg, Ireland. Photo: Alistair Macdonald/The Wall Street Journal

Back in his native Ireland, he is discovering that not everybody else has.

“You shouldn’t say you are going to do something, unless you are going to do it,” said Anne Cassidy, who had come to watch the band play in Derrybeg, a village in the northwest coast of Ireland.

But there is the question of finance and logistics, Mr. Warfield said, from his hotel ahead of the show.

Share Your Thoughts

How long could you stay on an 80-foot wide, uninhabited island? Join the conversation below.

The logistics would require the aging musicians to brave gales and rough seas in a journey that could take up to 30 hours from an Irish port.

“It’s essentially just a big rock in the middle of nowhere, covered in bird excrement,” said Englishman Nick Hancock, who spent a record 45 days on Rockall in 2014.

Aside from the waves, the band will have to conquer huge swells at the base of the rock that make it difficult to get close, warns Tom McClean, a Brit who spent 40 days there in the 1980s.

With no place to land, visitors have to swim or leap onto the rock from a boat. Once on, the Wolfe Tones would need to climb 50 feet up the rock to plant the Irish flag. Mr. Hancock is an experienced rock climber and plays rugby. Mr. McClean is a former member of Britain’s elite Special Air Service group.

Englishman Nick Hancock spent a record 45 days on Rockall in 2014. Photo: Getty Images

The Wolfe Tones play golf.

“How can the Wolfe Tones do it? We are just a band,” Tommy Byrne, the 75-year-old guitarist, asked Mr. Warfield, as they settled into comfy chairs and pints of beer. “I’m not saying that I am not up for it, but 40-foot waves?” he said.

Noel Nagle, the band’s 75-year-old whistle player, wasn’t surprised to hear of Mr. Warfield’s promise on his and Mr. Byrne’s behalf.

“I’ve known him for over 50 years, I know what he’s like,” he said. “He’s gung ho.”

Mr. Warfield, who is currently writing a musical about Ireland’s Great Famine, is feeling positive. He posits a drone to get the flag onto Rockall. Mr. Byrne suggests a helicopter.

Calls for the Wolfe Tones to live up to their promise, and the band’s reaction to those demands, come with humor. The episode has also reminded the band members of their own mortality.

Having talked about the trip to Rockall since the 70s, the “Wolfers” know the trip gets harder every year. Meanwhile, the band’s retirement no longer seems distant after 50 years plus of touring.

Politics is forcing the issue. Though Scotland can already claim exclusive fishing rights in the 12 miles off Rockall, champions of Brexit made control of British waters a high-profile issue.

“Rockall is very much British…the Irish will fish the squid and fish there to extinction,” said Mike Park, who used to fish haddock there and is now chief executive of the Scottish White Fish Producers Association Limited.

Brian Warfield, Tommy Byrne and Noel Nagle of the band The Wolfe Tones perform during a cultural festival in 2013. Photo: Jaroslav Ozana/CTK/ZUMA PRESS

In recent decades, the U.K. and Ireland have enjoyed a mainly harmonious relationship. But the sticking point in Britain’s attempts to strike an EU exit deal has been treatment of the border between Ireland and Northern Ireland, raising hackles on both sides.

The Wolfe Tones are sometimes called anti-British, with songs such as the “Rifles of the I.R.A,” about the Irish Republican Army, which was responsible for a string of bombings in the U.K. The band, which began in England, says songs about past injustices don’t imply dislike for Britain as a whole or as it is now.

As the Derrybeg gig approached, the Wolfe Tones concluded that Rockall was worth pursuing.

“With a no-deal Brexit, the Brits will only end up making it even harder for Irish fisherman,” Mr. Nagle said, getting up to leave, but struggling to rise from his seat.

“And you want to go to Rockall?” Mr. Byrne said, putting down his beer.

The group opened to a raucous welcome from a crowd bedecked in the Irish flag. But the night’s loudest cheer went to “Rock on Rockall.”

“Oh the Empire it is finished, no foreign lands to seize, so the greedy eye of England is stirring towards the seas,” Mr. Warfield sang.

“Who’s got a boat to bring the Wolfers out to Rockall?” he shouted

Hands shot up, including Oran Gallagher, standing at the front of the stage.

“No matter the waves, I’ll take him,” the 20-year old said later.

Another boat was also offered that night, according to Mr. Warfield.

Even one-time Rockall residents Mr. McClean and Mr. Hancock believe that, with great determination, the Wolfers can maybe do it. Now in his 80s, Mr. McClean doesn’t rule out a Rockall return himself. His website describes his vessel as “the world’s only giant whale-shaped boat.”

Mr. Hancock remembers moments of great beauty on Rockall, with real whales blowing water and gannets divebombing into the ocean for food.

But, “when the weather is bad, you really don’t want to be there,” he said.

Write to Alistair MacDonald at alistair.macdonald@wsj.com

Copyright ©2019 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.wsj.com/articles/folk-singer-said-hed-reclaim-a-british-rock-for-ireland-fans-wont-let-him-forget-11565973569

2019-08-16 16:39:00Z
CAIiEL6D_nBU8hjvcn0sqPr4GOsqFwgEKg8IACoHCAow1tzJATDnyxUw54IY